{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:32:58Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0952c-4cb9-76e1-b6cb-f5594a3a9707\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: iodine pit\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regi", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 75.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0952c-4cb9-7ed3-b2cc-3dffaae6425c\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: iodine pit\nRegistry id: vr.tr.iodine-pit\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:39:39+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q15649597", "registryId": "vr.tr.iodine-pit", "name": "iodine pit", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q15649597/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.iodine-pit", "name": "iodine pit", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise an iodine-pit episode, assess its evolving xenon-related reactivity deficit, and identify what evidence is needed to judge restart constraints.", "definition": "An iodine pit is a transient interval after a nuclear reactor shutdown or substantial power reduction in which xenon-135, produced by decay of accumulated iodine-135, introduces enough negative reactivity to prevent restart or the intended power increase with the available reactivity.", "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.iodine-pit as a reactor-physics phenomenon: transient xenon-135 poisoning associated with iodine-135 decay following a power reduction or shutdown, including the narrower condition of xenon-precluded restart; it records which meaning each application adopts.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions distinguishing the xenon transient from the interval in which xenon prevents restart", "Power and neutron-flux history establishing the initial iodine and xenon inventories", "Evolution of iodine-135, xenon-135 and their contribution to reactivity", "Episode onset, peak poisoning, recovery and restart-preclusion interval", "Evidence, uncertainty and reactor-specific applicability of an iodine-pit assessment" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General reactor design, licensing and operating procedures", "Complete nuclear properties of iodine and xenon isotopes", "Radioiodine releases, iodine spiking and thyroid protection", "Other fission-product poisons and long-term fuel depletion", "Detailed spatial xenon-oscillation models", "Plant-wide restart authorisation and equipment readiness" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify iodine-135 feeding xenon-135 as the relevant precursor-absorber relationship; elemental iodine toxicity does not establish an iodine pit.", "Establish a transient following a power reduction or shutdown rather than merely the presence of equilibrium xenon poisoning.", "For the restart-preclusion meaning, demonstrate that the xenon penalty exceeds the applicable available reactivity; a xenon concentration peak alone is insufficient.", "Separate a whole-core reactivity depression from spatial xenon oscillations, while allowing both phenomena to coexist.", "Distinguish xenon-driven restart restriction from restrictions caused by other poisons, equipment conditions or operating requirements." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Definition adopted", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "post-reduction xenon transient | xenon-precluded restart interval | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines what qualifies as an instance and when the episode begins and ends." }, { "name": "Host core and configuration", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "reference to reactor, core loading, cycle state and dated configuration", "why_it_matters": "Connects the episode to the conditions governing its reactivity significance." }, { "name": "Preceding power and flux history", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "time series in MW thermal or percent rated power, and neutrons/cm²/s where available", "why_it_matters": "Supports estimation of the inventories present when power changes." }, { "name": "Elapsed time from initiating change", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "hours from a specified timestamp", "why_it_matters": "Provides a common time origin for observations and forecasts." }, { "name": "Iodine-135 and xenon-135 inventories", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "atoms or atoms/cm³, with spatial basis and estimation uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Represents the precursor supply and neutron-absorbing inventory separately." }, { "name": "Xenon reactivity contribution", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "pcm or Δk/k, with sign convention and reference state", "why_it_matters": "Expresses the poisoning effect in terms comparable with the core reactivity assessment." }, { "name": "Restart reactivity balance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "pcm or Δk/k relative to the stated restart criterion", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes significant poisoning from poisoning that actually precludes restart." }, { "name": "Episode phase", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "building | near peak | recovering | resolved under adopted criterion | indeterminate", "why_it_matters": "Records the trajectory without equating falling xenon with permission to restart." }, { "name": "Predicted preclusion interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "start and end timestamps or hours after initiating change, with uncertainty bounds", "why_it_matters": "Makes the expected restriction conditional on an explicit model and criterion." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a reported event against an explicitly selected iodine-pit definition.", "Assemble the power history and inventory estimates needed for a qualified transient assessment.", "Compare observed trends with predicted xenon buildup and recovery.", "Estimate a conditional restart-preclusion interval using a validated reactor-specific analysis.", "Flag missing evidence or competing causes of a reactivity deficit.", "Refer the assessment to the applicable operating procedure and responsible reactor personnel." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the iodine pit and xenon poisoning in general terms from reactor physics sources.", "Report reactor status to licensed operators on systems the agent is authorized to read." ], "must_not": [ "Act on reactor controls, interlocks or safety systems without licensed operator authority.", "Advise operators to bypass safety limits to overcome reduced reactivity.", "Present simulated or estimated reactivity figures as measured values.", "Hide or downplay abnormal reactor behaviour in reports to operators or regulators." ], "requires_human": [ "Any decision to restart or raise power after a shutdown or power reduction.", "Any change to reactor operating procedures." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Pushing a reactor against xenon effects contributed to a major nuclear accident; safety culture must come first.", "Nuclear incidents harm people and land far beyond the plant." ], "affected_parties": [ "Plant workers", "Nearby communities", "The wider public and environment" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The licensed operator of the reactor, under the oversight of the national nuclear regulator.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Attempts to force a restart can leave a reactor in an unstable state.", "Uneven xenon distribution can cause power oscillations in large cores." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "IAEA Safety Standards for the operation of nuclear power plants, International Atomic Energy Agency." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "An iodine pit is encountered in nuclear reactor operation after shutdown or a substantial reduction in power when xenon-135 temporarily limits available reactivity.", "The concept is used in reactor physics assessments and operating reviews to explain why a planned restart or power increase may be temporarily unavailable." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "An iodine pit has no directly visible identifying features and must be established from reactor operating history, measurements and reactor physics analysis." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q15649597: iodine pit", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15649597", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Iodine pit", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodine_pit", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meaning-and-instance-boundary", "name": "Meaning and instance boundary", "description": "Define what the iodine-pit label denotes in this application.", "rationale": "A transient poisoning episode and an actual restart prohibition require different instance criteria.", "layers": [ { "id": "terminology-and-authority", "name": "Terminology and authority", "description": "Record the meaning used by a reference, facility or analyst.", "findings": [ { "id": "adopted-iodine-pit-definition", "name": "Adopted iodine-pit definition", "description": "Record whether the term denotes the broader transient or specifically xenon-precluded startup. The latter and xenon dead time are defined in the [DOE reactor theory handbook, Xenon section](https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/NNPTC/RD/doe_rx_theory_v2.pdf).", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this application require demonstrated restart preclusion before calling an episode an iodine pit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "adopted-iodine-pit-definition-q01" }, { "text": "Which reference or facility terminology establishes that usage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "adopted-iodine-pit-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "episode-membership", "name": "Episode membership", "description": "Identify the reactor occurrence and exclude superficially similar conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualifying-reactivity-transient", "name": "Qualifying reactivity transient", "description": "Require an identified host core, initiating power change and evidence linking the assessed deficit to xenon.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which core and power-change event identify this occurrence?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "qualifying-reactivity-transient-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this occurrence from equilibrium xenon poisoning or a non-xenon restart restriction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualifying-reactivity-transient-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "precursor-inventory-and-trigger", "name": "Precursor inventory and trigger", "description": "Capture the history and physical mechanism needed to explain the episode.", "rationale": "The label alone cannot establish the starting inventories or subsequent trajectory.", "layers": [ { "id": "initial-inventory-basis", "name": "Initial inventory basis", "description": "Establish the state immediately before the initiating change.", "findings": [ { "id": "power-history-reconstruction", "name": "Power history reconstruction", "description": "Record the preceding operating history and whether equilibrium inventories are justified or merely assumed.", "questions": [ { "text": "What power and flux history supports the initial iodine-135 and xenon-135 estimates?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "power-history-reconstruction-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports or rejects an equilibrium assumption at the initiating time?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "power-history-reconstruction-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "production-and-removal-balance", "name": "Production and removal balance", "description": "Represent the competing processes controlling xenon inventory.", "findings": [ { "id": "iodine-fed-xenon-buildup", "name": "Iodine-fed xenon buildup", "description": "Iodine-135 decay supplies xenon-135; xenon removal involves decay and neutron absorption. Power reduction changes this balance. See the [DOE reactor theory handbook, Xenon section](https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/NNPTC/RD/doe_rx_theory_v2.pdf).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which production and removal terms are represented in the episode calculation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "iodine-fed-xenon-buildup-q01" }, { "text": "Does the estimated post-change balance support rising xenon for this particular history?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "iodine-fed-xenon-buildup-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "reactivity-deficit-and-preclusion", "name": "Reactivity deficit and preclusion", "description": "Connect the xenon inventory to the core's ability to meet a defined restart criterion.", "rationale": "Inventory and poisoning magnitude do not independently establish restart preclusion.", "layers": [ { "id": "xenon-worth", "name": "Xenon worth", "description": "Translate the assessed xenon distribution into its reactivity contribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "inventory-to-reactivity-assessment", "name": "Inventory-to-reactivity assessment", "description": "Record the calculation basis, reference condition and uncertainty of the xenon penalty.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reactor-specific analysis converts the inventory estimate into xenon reactivity worth?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inventory-to-reactivity-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "What sign convention, reference state and uncertainty accompany the reported worth?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "inventory-to-reactivity-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "preclusion-criterion", "name": "Preclusion criterion", "description": "Determine whether the assessed xenon penalty prevents restart under the specified conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "available-reactivity-comparison", "name": "Available reactivity comparison", "description": "Xenon-precluded startup occurs when available positive reactivity cannot counteract xenon poisoning; this is distinct from poisoning alone. See the [DOE reactor theory handbook, page 39](https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/NNPTC/RD/doe_rx_theory_v2.pdf).", "questions": [ { "text": "What available-reactivity assessment and operating constraints define the comparison?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "available-reactivity-comparison-q01" }, { "text": "Does the comparison establish preclusion, non-preclusion or an unresolved result within uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "available-reactivity-comparison-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "trajectory-and-recovery", "name": "Trajectory and recovery", "description": "Track the episode over time and distinguish its different milestones.", "rationale": "Peak xenon, greatest reactivity deficit and the end of restart preclusion need explicit definitions.", "layers": [ { "id": "transient-milestones", "name": "Transient milestones", "description": "Record the initiating event and assessed progression.", "findings": [ { "id": "onset-peak-and-trend", "name": "Onset, peak and trend", "description": "Maintain separate timestamps for the initiating power change, poisoning peak and any preclusion boundaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which milestones are observed and which are predicted?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "onset-peak-and-trend-q01" }, { "text": "Does the reported peak refer to xenon concentration, xenon worth or total reactivity deficit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "onset-peak-and-trend-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conditional-recovery", "name": "Conditional recovery", "description": "Specify the conditions under which the episode is considered resolved.", "findings": [ { "id": "recovery-threshold-and-forecast", "name": "Recovery threshold and forecast", "description": "Record the adopted recovery threshold and forecast assumptions without assigning a universal waiting period.", "questions": [ { "text": "What threshold ends this episode under the adopted definition?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recovery-threshold-and-forecast-q01" }, { "text": "What future power history and configuration are assumed by the predicted recovery interval?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recovery-threshold-and-forecast-q02" }, { "text": "Which new observation or configuration change requires the forecast to be reassessed?", "kind": "action", "id": "recovery-threshold-and-forecast-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-validity-and-use", "name": "Assessment validity and use", "description": "Establish whether the available evidence supports using an iodine-pit assessment for the host reactor.", "rationale": "A plausible generic explanation cannot substitute for a validated assessment of a particular core.", "layers": [ { "id": "evidence-and-applicability", "name": "Evidence and applicability", "description": "Identify inference limits and distinguish xenon effects from other contributions.", "findings": [ { "id": "validated-episode-assessment", "name": "Validated episode assessment", "description": "Record data provenance, calculation validation and whether spatial effects or competing reactivity changes undermine a whole-core interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observations independently support the inferred xenon transient?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "validated-episode-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Could temperature changes, other poisons or spatial flux redistribution materially alter the interpretation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "validated-episode-assessment-q02" }, { "text": "What validation supports applying this calculation method to the identified core?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "validated-episode-assessment-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "decision-interface", "name": "Decision interface", "description": "Connect assessment results to the process that owns operational decisions.", "findings": [ { "id": "restart-assessment-handoff", "name": "Restart assessment handoff", "description": "Present the xenon-related conclusion, uncertainty and validity conditions to the responsible operating process; recovery is one input to restart readiness.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which procedure and responsible role review the xenon assessment before a restart decision?", "kind": "action", "id": "restart-assessment-handoff-q01" }, { "text": "What unresolved evidence prevents a reliable conclusion about xenon preclusion?", "kind": "action", "id": "restart-assessment-handoff-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The name is interpreted in its nuclear reactor physics sense because no registry sense was supplied.", "Usage overlaps with 'xenon pit' and 'xenon dead time'; a researcher should check whether the intended source distinguishes these terms.", "The depth and duration depend on reactor design, operating history and available reactivity; no universal waiting period is asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of iodine pit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Explaining temporary restrictions on reactor restart following shutdown.", "Accounting for xenon poisoning when planning reactor power changes.", "Teaching the coupled production, decay and neutron absorption of iodine-135 and xenon-135." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of iodine pit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Iodine-135 radioactive half-life", "typical_range": "Approximately 6.6", "unit": "hours" }, { "quantity": "Xenon-135 radioactive half-life", "typical_range": "Approximately 9.1", "unit": "hours" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of iodine pit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "An unplanned shutdown can be followed by temporary inability to restart because xenon absorption exceeds available excess reactivity.", "Incorrect prediction of iodine and xenon inventories can undermine power manoeuvring plans.", "As xenon subsequently decays, its negative reactivity diminishes and must be accounted for in reactor control." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of iodine pit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Xenon poisoning", "difference": "Xenon poisoning is neutron absorption by xenon-135 generally; an iodine pit is the transient condition in which this poisoning prevents the intended reactor operation." }, { "name": "Iodine-135", "difference": "Iodine-135 is the radioactive precursor supplying xenon-135; the iodine pit is a reactor operating condition, not a substance or physical cavity." }, { "name": "Xenon oscillation", "difference": "A xenon oscillation involves changing spatial distributions of xenon and neutron flux; an iodine pit concerns a temporary reactivity deficit." }, { "name": "Samarium poisoning", "difference": "Samarium poisoning principally involves neutron absorption by stable samarium-149 and does not disappear through radioactive decay in the way xenon-135 poisoning does." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of iodine pit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend iodine pit to cover every post-reduction xenon transient or only the interval of xenon-precluded restart?", "Which authoritative references establish the relationship among iodine pit, xenon pit, xenon poisoning and xenon dead time across reactor communities?", "What reactor-specific evidence and uncertainty criteria are sufficient to classify an episode as confirmed rather than predicted?", "When is a whole-core assessment adequate, and when must this model link to a spatial xenon model?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this phenomenon, requiring this registry entry to link to that publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 27 } }