{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:22:26Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 23.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b4-d02c-7b91-b672-55113e9e52c2\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: capacity utilization\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.PRC\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043:", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 74.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b4-d03a-7b40-ae0c-fe6e34bec1f0\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: capacity utilization\nRegistry id: vr.tr.capacity-utilization\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.PRC\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into thi" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T11:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:13:40+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1597271", "registryId": "vr.tr.capacity-utilization", "name": "capacity utilization", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.PRC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1597271/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.capacity-utilization", "name": "capacity utilization", "purpose": "Enable an agent to interpret capacity utilization, assess how fully a productive system is being used, and identify justified operational responses under an explicit capacity definition.", "definition": "Capacity utilization is the ratio of actual output to a specified measure of productive capacity over the same period, with the result depending on whether capacity means an engineering maximum, sustainable practical output, or an economically defined output level.", "scope_statement": "This model owns capacity utilization as a time-bounded relationship between productive activity and a stated capacity benchmark for a defined resource, process, facility, or aggregate within ACT / ACT.PRC.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of utilization and the capacity benchmarks they depend on", "Actual output or productive resource use within a specified measurement boundary", "Calculation, estimation, aggregation, and comparability of utilization measures", "Interpretation of spare capacity, overload, and constraints", "Decisions supported by utilization evidence and the limits of that evidence" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Physical design and engineering specifications of productive assets", "Complete production scheduling and resource allocation models", "Overall equipment effectiveness and its separate availability, performance, and quality components", "Labor productivity, profitability, and production efficiency as independent measures", "Demand forecasting and investment appraisal beyond their relationship to utilization" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A utilization measure relates observed activity to a capacity benchmark; an output total alone does not qualify.", "Its denominator must identify a productive boundary, time basis, and operating assumptions; an unexplained percentage cannot establish utilization.", "Output-based utilization and occupied-time utilization can differ because occupied resources may produce at different rates or perform nonproductive work.", "High utilization does not by itself demonstrate efficiency, profitability, or acceptable service performance.", "A change in utilization can result from changed activity, changed capacity, or revised assumptions; it need not indicate a change in demand." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Productive boundary", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Specified resource, work center, process, facility, enterprise, or sector", "why_it_matters": "Determines which activity and capacity belong in the same comparison." }, { "name": "Utilization operationalization", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Output divided by output capacity; productive time divided by available time; occupied time divided by available time; other explicitly defined method", "why_it_matters": "Measures with the same label may answer different operational questions." }, { "name": "Capacity benchmark", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Design or nameplate; maximum sustainable; effective under stated conditions; scheduled or available; other source-defined benchmark", "why_it_matters": "The chosen benchmark determines what full utilization means." }, { "name": "Reference interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Start and end timestamps, duration, and calendar or shift basis", "why_it_matters": "Activity and capacity must refer to compatible intervals." }, { "name": "Observed activity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Output units per interval, productive resource-hours, occupied resource-hours, or explicitly normalized equivalents", "why_it_matters": "Makes the numerator inspectable, including treatment of rejects and rework." }, { "name": "Reference capacity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Output units per matching interval or resource-hours available in that interval", "why_it_matters": "Makes the denominator inspectable and exposes changes in operating assumptions." }, { "name": "Utilization value", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Dimensionless ratio or percentage, accompanied by its calculation method", "why_it_matters": "Summarizes use relative to the benchmark; values above 100% require interpretation rather than automatic rejection." }, { "name": "Capacity conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Product mix, staffing, shifts, maintenance allowance, input availability, and applicable operating constraints", "why_it_matters": "Capacity estimates may cease to apply when these conditions change." }, { "name": "Evidence status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Measured, estimated, reported, revised, disputed, or unavailable, with uncertainty where supported", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an estimate or survey response from being treated as an exact observation." } ], "affordances": [ "Calculate utilization when activity and capacity share compatible units, boundaries, and intervals.", "Compare periods or productive units after checking benchmark and method compatibility.", "Separate numerator changes from denominator changes when explaining a utilization movement.", "Investigate whether apparent spare capacity is usable under the required product mix and constraints.", "Evaluate scheduling, maintenance, demand-management, or expansion scenarios against utilization evidence.", "Flag unsupported interpretations, including equating high utilization with good performance." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Compute and report capacity utilization with the definition of capacity stated.", "Use official statistics with their source and date." ], "must_not": [ "Compare figures that use different definitions of capacity as if they were alike.", "Present a utilization target as a reason to overwork staff or skip maintenance.", "Fabricate or adjust published figures." ], "requires_human": [ "Decisions on staffing cuts or plant closures based on utilization figures." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Pushing utilization too high can harm workers' health and safety and machine reliability." ], "affected_parties": [ "Workers", "Managers and investors", "Users of economic statistics" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The organization measuring it; national statistics offices publish economy-wide figures.", "master_systems": [ "National statistics office releases" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Expressed as a percentage of capacity in a period.", "Appears in industrial surveys and operational dashboards." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misleading figures from inconsistent capacity definitions.", "Overloading people and equipment to meet a target." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Capacity utilization is used in factories, utilities and other productive systems to compare actual output with a defined production capacity.", "Managers use it to assess spare capacity and support scheduling or investment decisions, while economists use aggregate measures to study production conditions.", "Comparisons require compatible capacity definitions, reporting periods and output measures." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No single standard or regulation governs capacity utilization across all economic applications, so the reporting framework must supply its definition." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1597271: capacity utilization", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1597271", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Capacity utilization", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacity_utilization", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "utilization-meaning", "name": "Utilization meaning", "description": "Establishes which interpretation of capacity utilization an observation represents.", "rationale": "Capacity utilization is not interpretable until the activity measure and capacity convention are explicit.", "layers": [ { "id": "operational-definition", "name": "Operational definition", "description": "Separates output-based, productive-time, and occupancy-based interpretations.", "findings": [ { "id": "activity-to-capacity-relationship", "name": "Activity-to-capacity relationship", "description": "Record the operational definition, its adopting source or organization, and the question it is intended to answer.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does utilization mean output relative to output capacity, productive time relative to available time, or occupancy relative to availability?", "kind": "definition", "id": "activity-to-capacity-relationship-q01" }, { "text": "Which organization or methodology supplies this definition, and how does it differ from other definitions used for this system?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "activity-to-capacity-relationship-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "productive-system-boundary", "name": "Productive system boundary", "description": "Identifies the productive unit and the activities included in its utilization.", "findings": [ { "id": "included-resources-and-work", "name": "Included resources and work", "description": "Record the resources, production stages, and work categories covered by the observation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this value describe a machine, a work center, an entire process, a facility, or an aggregate of producers?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "included-resources-and-work-q01" }, { "text": "Are outsourced production, shared resources, setup, and rework included consistently in both activity and capacity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "included-resources-and-work-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "capacity-denominator", "name": "Capacity denominator", "description": "Makes the reference capacity and its operating assumptions explicit.", "rationale": "A utilization percentage can change meaning substantially when its capacity benchmark changes.", "layers": [ { "id": "benchmark-selection", "name": "Benchmark selection", "description": "Identifies what the denominator treats as full capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "reference-capacity-convention", "name": "Reference capacity convention", "description": "Record the benchmark definition, estimation method, and allowances that shape the denominator.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the denominator nameplate capacity, sustainable output, effective capacity, or capacity available under a specified schedule?", "kind": "definition", "id": "reference-capacity-convention-q01" }, { "text": "How was reference capacity established, and which maintenance, downtime, staffing, and shift allowances were applied?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reference-capacity-convention-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conditional-and-changing-capacity", "name": "Conditional and changing capacity", "description": "Tracks capacity dependence on product mix and operating conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "capacity-validity-conditions", "name": "Capacity validity conditions", "description": "Record the conditions under which the denominator applies and changes that require its revision.", "questions": [ { "text": "For which product mix, staffing level, input conditions, and operating restrictions is this capacity estimate valid?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "capacity-validity-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "Did additions, retirements, maintenance outages, or changed shifts alter capacity during the interval, and how were those changes incorporated?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "capacity-validity-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "activity-and-calculation", "name": "Activity and calculation", "description": "Establishes the observed activity and the calculation connecting it to capacity.", "rationale": "A reproducible utilization value requires compatible quantities and explicit treatment of production records.", "layers": [ { "id": "numerator-construction", "name": "Numerator construction", "description": "Specifies how output or resource use becomes the activity measure.", "findings": [ { "id": "counted-production-or-time", "name": "Counted production or time", "description": "Record the activity evidence, counting rules, and conversions used in the numerator.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the numerator count gross output, acceptable output, productive hours, or occupied hours, and how does it treat rejects and rework?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "counted-production-or-time-q01" }, { "text": "Which production records, meters, time logs, or survey responses support the activity value?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "counted-production-or-time-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ratio-integrity", "name": "Ratio integrity", "description": "Checks mathematical compatibility and exceptional observations.", "findings": [ { "id": "compatible-and-interpretable-ratio", "name": "Compatible and interpretable ratio", "description": "Record the formula, unit alignment, interval alignment, and handling of invalid or exceptional denominators.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do numerator and denominator use the same output equivalents or time units and cover the same reference interval?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "compatible-and-interpretable-ratio-q01" }, { "text": "If capacity is zero or unknown, or utilization exceeds 100%, should the result be withheld, qualified, or investigated for benchmark mismatch?", "kind": "action", "id": "compatible-and-interpretable-ratio-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "comparison-and-aggregation", "name": "Comparison and aggregation", "description": "Governs interpretation across periods, productive units, and reporting levels.", "rationale": "Local ratios can become misleading when combined or compared without preserving their denominator conventions.", "layers": [ { "id": "comparable-observations", "name": "Comparable observations", "description": "Identifies methodological and operational breaks in comparisons.", "findings": [ { "id": "comparison-basis", "name": "Comparison basis", "description": "Record which observations are comparable and which adjustments or qualifications are required.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do the compared observations use equivalent capacity definitions, product-mix assumptions, shift calendars, and output measures?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "comparison-basis-q01" }, { "text": "How much of the observed change comes from activity, capacity revisions, seasonal adjustment, or a change in reporting method?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "comparison-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "aggregate-construction", "name": "Aggregate construction", "description": "Explains how multiple utilization observations produce a reported aggregate.", "findings": [ { "id": "weighting-and-hidden-variation", "name": "Weighting and hidden variation", "description": "Record aggregation weights, population coverage, and variation concealed by a single aggregate value.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is aggregate utilization calculated from compatible summed quantities or from weighted individual rates, and what justifies the weights?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "weighting-and-hidden-variation-q01" }, { "text": "Which overloaded resources, idle facilities, or excluded producers are hidden by the aggregate?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "weighting-and-hidden-variation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "operational-interpretation-and-response", "name": "Operational interpretation and response", "description": "Connects utilization evidence to feasible operational choices without treating the percentage as a complete diagnosis.", "rationale": "The same utilization value can imply different actions depending on bottlenecks, demand, variability, and operating constraints.", "layers": [ { "id": "usable-headroom-and-constraints", "name": "Usable headroom and constraints", "description": "Distinguishes apparent unused capacity from capacity available for the required work.", "findings": [ { "id": "recoverable-spare-capacity", "name": "Recoverable spare capacity", "description": "Record whether the gap to reference capacity is accessible and what prevents its use.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can apparent spare capacity produce the required product or service with available labor, inputs, tooling, and downstream capacity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recoverable-spare-capacity-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes low demand from downtime, input shortages, scheduling losses, or a bottleneck elsewhere?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recoverable-spare-capacity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "decision-conditions", "name": "Decision conditions", "description": "Defines when utilization supports intervention and what additional evidence is needed.", "findings": [ { "id": "utilization-informed-intervention", "name": "Utilization-informed intervention", "description": "Record proposed actions, their operating assumptions, and performance measures needed to evaluate them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Given demand variability, queues, maintenance needs, and service commitments, what evidence supports the proposed utilization target?", "kind": "action", "id": "utilization-informed-intervention-q01" }, { "text": "Would rescheduling, maintenance, an added shift, demand management, or additional capacity address the diagnosed constraint, and how would the outcome be evaluated?", "kind": "action", "id": "utilization-informed-intervention-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded; this description assumes the production and operations concept rather than storage, network, or computing resource utilization.", "Engineering, sustainable, and economic capacity definitions are not interchangeable; a researcher should establish the intended denominator before selecting an operational measure.", "Institutional examples are recalled without source checking; exact methodologies and coverage should be verified before publication." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Engineering or nameplate capacity utilization", "Practical or sustainable capacity utilization", "Economically defined capacity utilization", "Survey-reported capacity utilization" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Manufacturers use it to assess spare capacity and plan production, shifts, maintenance, and investment.", "Central banks and economic analysts monitor industrial utilization as evidence of production slack and potential supply pressure.", "Operations managers compare utilization across facilities or production lines when their capacity definitions are comparable.", "Economic researchers use it to study business cycles, investment, and productivity." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Output-based capacity utilization", "typical_range": "Usually 0-100%; values above 100% can occur when output exceeds the rated or estimated capacity benchmark.", "unit": "%" }, { "quantity": "Unused capacity share", "typical_range": "Usually 0-100%, calculated as 100% minus utilization under the same capacity definition.", "unit": "%" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Comparing ratios based on different assumptions about shifts, maintenance, product mix, or sustainable operating conditions.", "Treating capacity as fixed despite equipment changes, staffing constraints, input shortages, or changing production methods.", "Using an aggregate utilization rate that conceals bottlenecks in individual processes.", "Pursuing very high utilization in variable production or service systems without allowing for longer queues, maintenance, and disruption.", "Interpreting low utilization as technical inefficiency when it may reflect weak demand, seasonality, or deliberately retained reserve capacity." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The US Federal Reserve publishes industrial capacity utilization estimates using a sustainable maximum output concept.", "European Commission business surveys collect manufacturers' assessments of capacity utilization; these survey measures are not automatically equivalent to output-to-capacity estimates.", "Coverage, aggregation, seasonal adjustment, and capacity definitions differ across national statistical systems." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Capacity", "difference": "Capacity is the output capability used as the denominator; utilization expresses how much of that capability is used." }, { "name": "Production output", "difference": "Output is an amount produced during a period; utilization relates that amount to capacity for the same period." }, { "name": "Productivity", "difference": "Productivity relates output to inputs consumed, whereas capacity utilization relates output to available productive capacity." }, { "name": "Efficiency", "difference": "Efficiency evaluates performance against an input-output or cost benchmark; high capacity utilization alone does not establish efficient production." }, { "name": "Equipment availability", "difference": "Availability measures whether equipment is able to operate during a specified time; available equipment may remain idle and therefore underutilized." }, { "name": "Overall equipment effectiveness", "difference": "Overall equipment effectiveness combines availability, performance, and quality relative to planned production time; it does not directly measure output against total productive capacity." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of capacity utilization this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend capacity utilization primarily as an industrial output statistic, an operational resource-use measure, or a concept encompassing both?", "Which authoritative methodologies should anchor the distinctions among design, sustainable, effective, and scheduled capacity?", "How should heterogeneous products and services be converted into comparable activity and capacity quantities without hiding product-mix effects?", "Which aggregation and uncertainty methods are appropriate for linking facility observations to enterprise or sector utilization?", "What domain-specific evidence can justify utilization targets while accounting for queues, resilience, maintenance, and service commitments?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }