{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:03:08Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09548-02ae-7700-8422-0b00d2862ea8\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: loss of clerical state\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.PRC\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 04", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09548-02bd-7fa0-9d12-b272c4f8e7d0\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: loss of clerical state\nRegistry id: vr.tr.loss-of-clerical-state\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.PRC\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T11:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:06:58+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q16959693", "registryId": "vr.tr.loss-of-clerical-state", "name": "loss of clerical state", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.PRC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q16959693/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.loss-of-clerical-state", "name": "loss of clerical state", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a legally established loss of clerical state, distinguish it from restrictions on ministry, and determine which consequences and further authorisations require verification.", "definition": "In Catholic canon law, loss of the clerical state is the juridical cessation of a person's status as a cleric through a legally specified procedure, without undoing a valid sacramental ordination.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the process and resulting status transition identified by vr.tr.loss-of-clerical-state in ACT / ACT.PRC, provisionally using Latin Catholic canon law as its reference jurisdiction while leaving cross-tradition coverage unresolved.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of the cleric, applicable ecclesiastical jurisdiction and governing law", "Legal route, competent authority and operative instrument establishing the loss", "Procedural progress, notification, effectiveness and challenges", "Consequences for clerical rights, obligations, offices and ministry", "Separate dispensations, exceptional permissions and subsequent readmission" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Ordination rites and sacramental theology beyond distinctions needed to identify this transition", "Complete investigation and adjudication of underlying misconduct", "Suspension, retirement or removal from a particular office without loss of clerical state", "Departure from a religious institute and release from religious vows as independent processes", "Civil employment, compensation and marriage proceedings", "Excommunication, apostasy and changes of religious affiliation" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An instance requires evidence of a change in clerical status, rather than merely cessation of ministry or loss of employment.", "The Latin Catholic baseline distinguishes a declaration of invalid ordination, penal dismissal and an Apostolic See rescript as routes; loss does not invalidate an ordination validly received. [Canons 290-293](https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann208-329_en.html)", "A request to leave and an effective act granting or imposing loss are different procedural states.", "Celibacy dispensation must be checked separately; canon 291 specifies an exception for declared invalidity of ordination. [Canon 291](https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann208-329_en.html)", "The description 'defrocked' alone does not establish the legal route, effective date or any finding of misconduct." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Applicable canonical framework", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Church, jurisdiction, governing provisions and version applicable at the relevant date", "why_it_matters": "Prevents importing one tradition's rules into another tradition or historical period." }, { "name": "Clerical standing before the transition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Claimed or documented diaconate, presbyterate or episcopate; disputed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification of the subject and research into route-specific requirements." }, { "name": "Legal route", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Declared invalidity of ordination; penal dismissal; Apostolic See rescript; other jurisdiction-specific route; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Separates distinct grounds and procedures without treating every loss as punishment." }, { "name": "Procedural position", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Reported; initiated; pending; instrument issued; effective; challenged; effect unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a pending petition or unverified report from becoming an asserted completed transition." }, { "name": "Operative authority and instrument", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Issuing authority linked to authenticated sentence, decree or rescript and its operative clauses", "why_it_matters": "Provides the evidence against which the claimed change can be checked." }, { "name": "Effective date", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Calendar date with precision and evidentiary basis; unknown if unestablished", "why_it_matters": "Determines which status applies when assessing a subsequent act." }, { "name": "Celibacy obligation assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Continuing; separately dispensed; inapplicable under verified rule; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Keeps an independent obligation from being inferred solely from clerical status." }, { "name": "Subsequent canonical acts", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked dispensations, corrections, review decisions, permissions and readmission instruments", "why_it_matters": "Allows later changes to be assessed without erasing the original transition." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a reported departure against documented routes for loss of clerical state.", "Identify missing instruments or unresolved effectiveness before updating a person's recorded status.", "Construct a chronology separating petition, decision, notification and legal effect.", "Assess a proposed ministry activity against verified restrictions and any applicable exception.", "Route celibacy dispensation and readmission questions to the separately competent authority.", "Produce an evidence-linked status account that separates established effects from unresolved claims." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the canon law on loss of the clerical state, citing the canons.", "Report official decisions that the competent Church authority has published." ], "must_not": [ "Publish or speculate about a named cleric's case beyond official statements.", "Present loss of the clerical state as a finding of guilt where it was granted on request.", "Present Church procedure as a replacement for criminal justice in cases of abuse." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing information about a specific case." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Victims of clerical abuse need accountability, and church process alone does not provide it.", "Clerics who leave on request deserve privacy and should not be presumed guilty." ], "affected_parties": [ "Victims of abuse", "Clerics concerned", "Church communities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The competent Church authority, ultimately the Holy See, decides each case.", "master_systems": [ "Diocesan and Holy See records" ] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Loss of clerical state is encountered in Catholic ecclesiastical administration and canon law when a person's juridical status as a cleric ends.", "It is used to establish consequences for clerical rights, obligations and ministry while distinguishing juridical status from the permanence of valid ordination.", "Individual cases require attention to the applicable Catholic church and the terms of the authoritative decision." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Code of Canon Law, promulgated by Pope John Paul II, governs loss of the clerical state in the Latin Church through canons 290 to 293.", "The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, promulgated by Pope John Paul II, governs loss of the clerical state in Eastern Catholic Churches through canons 394 to 398." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Confusing loss of clerical state with suspension or another restriction can produce incorrect statements about a person's status.", "Assuming that loss of clerical state automatically removes every obligation can lead to incorrect decisions about marriage or ministry.", "Disclosing sensitive case information without appropriate authority can harm privacy and reputation.", "Treating loss of clerical state as proof of misconduct can cause unjustified reputational harm." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "Loss of clerical state is a juridical status that cannot be determined from a person's appearance or clothing." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q16959693: loss of clerical state", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q16959693", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Loss of clerical state", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_clerical_state", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "clerical-status-boundary", "name": "Clerical status boundary", "description": "Identify the particular status being lost and distinguish it from adjacent ecclesiastical changes.", "rationale": "Public descriptions of leaving priesthood often collapse several legally different events.", "layers": [ { "id": "governing-church-and-law", "name": "Governing Church and law", "description": "Establish the ecclesiastical framework in which the claimed loss has meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "jurisdiction-specific-meaning", "name": "Jurisdiction-specific meaning", "description": "Record the authoritative meaning used in the case rather than assuming universal equivalence of laicisation, deposition and defrocking.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which Church and body of law govern this person's claimed loss of clerical state?", "kind": "definition", "id": "jurisdiction-specific-meaning-q01" }, { "text": "Which authoritative text and effective version establish what the case's terminology means?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "jurisdiction-specific-meaning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "status-versus-ministry", "name": "Status versus ministry", "description": "Separate clerical standing, ordination claims and permission to perform particular functions.", "findings": [ { "id": "actual-status-transition", "name": "Actual status transition", "description": "Require an identifiable change of status rather than relying on absence from ministry or an occupational label.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes the person's clerical standing before the alleged transition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "actual-status-transition-q01" }, { "text": "Does the operative act concern clerical state, ordination validity, a particular office or only permission to minister?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "actual-status-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "route-and-competent-authority", "name": "Route and competent authority", "description": "Identify how loss is sought or imposed and who can establish it.", "rationale": "The route determines which grounds, authorities and documents must be examined.", "layers": [ { "id": "basis-of-loss", "name": "Basis of loss", "description": "Distinguish the legal basis from personal motives and public allegations.", "findings": [ { "id": "route-without-inferred-blame", "name": "Route without inferred blame", "description": "Record the instrument's legal basis without treating departure itself as evidence of wrongdoing.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which route does the operative instrument expressly invoke?", "kind": "definition", "id": "route-without-inferred-blame-q01" }, { "text": "Which grounds are established in the instrument, and which remain allegations or explanations supplied elsewhere?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "route-without-inferred-blame-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "authority-and-operative-text", "name": "Authority and operative text", "description": "Connect the claimed transition to an authorised decision and its actual terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "competent-act", "name": "Competent act", "description": "Assess the issuer's competence and distinguish a dispositive act from a recommendation or announcement.", "questions": [ { "text": "What provision establishes the issuing authority's competence for this route and this subject?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competent-act-q01" }, { "text": "Which clause actually declares, grants or imposes loss, and what conditions accompany it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "competent-act-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "procedure-and-effective-transition", "name": "Procedure and effective transition", "description": "Track whether and when the process establishes a change in clerical state.", "rationale": "A requested, announced or challenged loss cannot automatically be treated as effective.", "layers": [ { "id": "case-progression", "name": "Case progression", "description": "Represent the route's documented procedural milestones.", "findings": [ { "id": "petition-to-decision", "name": "Petition to decision", "description": "Maintain separate evidence for initiation, consideration and disposition.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was the process initiated by the cleric, by an ecclesiastical authority or through an ordination-validity challenge?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "petition-to-decision-q01" }, { "text": "What step remains before the claimed route can establish loss of clerical state?", "kind": "action", "id": "petition-to-decision-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "effectiveness-and-review", "name": "Effectiveness and review", "description": "Determine the operative date and the legal significance of any challenge.", "findings": [ { "id": "status-at-a-given-date", "name": "Status at a given date", "description": "Anchor the status assessment to the applicable effectiveness requirements and documented review history.", "questions": [ { "text": "What rule, notification or fulfilled condition establishes the date the loss took effect?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "status-at-a-given-date-q01" }, { "text": "Has a challenge been lodged, and what verified rule determines its effect on the decision's operation?", "kind": "action", "id": "status-at-a-given-date-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequences-and-subsequent-authorisations", "name": "Consequences and subsequent authorisations", "description": "Assess the practical consequences of established loss and any later modification.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish current restrictions from separately granted dispensations or restoration.", "layers": [ { "id": "rights-offices-and-ministry", "name": "Rights, offices and ministry", "description": "Connect established loss to the person's ecclesiastical functions and proposed activities.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequences-for-proposed-acts", "name": "Consequences for proposed acts", "description": "Canon 292 removes clerical rights, offices, functions and delegated power, and prohibits exercising orders subject to canon 976. [Canon 292](https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann208-329_en.html)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented offices, functions and delegated powers are affected in this case?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "consequences-for-proposed-acts-q01" }, { "text": "For the proposed ministry act, which prohibition or exception applies, and are its conditions verified?", "kind": "action", "id": "consequences-for-proposed-acts-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "dispensation-and-readmission", "name": "Dispensation and readmission", "description": "Track additional acts affecting obligations or later clerical standing.", "findings": [ { "id": "independent-later-authorisations", "name": "Independent later authorisations", "description": "Readmission requires an Apostolic See rescript under canon 293; record it separately from the original loss and any celibacy dispensation. [Canon 293](https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib2-cann208-329_en.html)", "questions": [ { "text": "What separate instrument, if any, resolves the person's celibacy obligation and associated conditions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "independent-later-authorisations-q01" }, { "text": "Does a later instrument authorise readmission, and which further appointments or ministry permissions still require verification?", "kind": "action", "id": "independent-later-authorisations-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The unqualified registry label is interpreted here in its Catholic canonical sense; broader interdenominational scope should be checked.", "This account is recalled knowledge, not a review of current canonical texts or procedures.", "Detailed procedural requirements, exceptions concerning sacramental ministry, and Eastern Catholic provisions require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Loss following a judicial sentence or administrative decree declaring ordination invalid", "Dismissal from the clerical state as a lawfully imposed penalty", "Loss through a rescript of the Apostolic See" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Catholic Church: 1983 Code of Canon Law, canons 290-293, governing loss of the clerical state, its consequences, and readmission", "Catholic Church: Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches, governing the corresponding institution in Eastern Catholic churches" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Resolving petitions from clerics seeking to leave the clerical state", "Imposing dismissal in canonical disciplinary proceedings", "Determining the loss of clerical rights, offices, functions, and delegated powers", "Distinguishing permission to exercise ministry from the enduring effects of valid ordination" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating loss of clerical status as erasure of a valid ordination", "Assuming loss of the clerical state automatically dispenses a validly ordained cleric from the obligation of celibacy", "Confusing suspension or removal from an office with loss of the clerical state", "Assuming every loss of clerical state is punitive or establishes misconduct", "Treating canonical dismissal as a substitute for civil investigation or accountability" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Latin Church and Eastern Catholic churches use different codes of canon law; the distinction follows ecclesial jurisdiction rather than national borders", "Other Christian traditions use terms such as deposition or defrocking under their own rules, which are not necessarily equivalent to the Catholic institution" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Suspension", "difference": "Suspension restricts specified clerical acts or powers while the person remains in the clerical state." }, { "name": "Removal from ecclesiastical office", "difference": "Removal ends a particular appointment without necessarily ending clerical status." }, { "name": "Dispensation from celibacy", "difference": "This releases a person from the canonical obligation of celibacy and is legally distinct from loss of clerical status." }, { "name": "Excommunication", "difference": "Excommunication is a canonical censure restricting participation in ecclesial life; it does not itself remove clerical status." }, { "name": "Declaration of invalidity of ordination", "difference": "This determines that ordination was invalid, whereas other routes to loss of clerical state leave valid ordination intact." }, { "name": "Laicization", "difference": "Often used as another name for loss of the clerical state, but can misleadingly suggest that sacramental ordination has been reversed." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of loss of clerical state this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend specifically the Latin Catholic institution, all Catholic Churches or comparable transitions across Christian traditions?", "Which additional procedural norms, special faculties and historical amendments govern each route, especially cases involving bishops?", "What notification, execution and review rules determine effectiveness for each type of sentence, decree or rescript?", "Which restrictions and dispensations arise from general law, and which depend on the terms of an individual instrument?", "How should contested terminology and conflicting public reports be represented when the operative instrument is unavailable?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 23 } }