{
  "vercy": "1.0-draft",
  "publication": {
    "status": "research-draft",
    "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed",
    "publishableCanonical": false,
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:43:23Z",
    "providers": [
      "Codex"
    ],
    "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read",
    "missingProviders": [],
    "pass": 2,
    "cost": {
      "grok": {
        "seconds": 24.1,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09535-e590-7f40-aa78-7117ec71ffb7\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: kapok\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.LIV\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 registere",
        "usd": 0.0,
        "recall": true
      },
      "codex": {
        "seconds": 71.6,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09535-e580-7493-9ef9-f3865489b9f5\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: kapok\nRegistry id: vr.tr.kapok\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext for "
      }
    },
    "enrichment": {
      "pass": 3,
      "engine": "claude",
      "producedAt": "2026-10-06T13:00:00Z",
      "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:56:58+00:00",
      "fields": [
        "agent_conduct",
        "ethics",
        "failure_modes_and_hazards",
        "owners",
        "visual_identification"
      ]
    }
  },
  "metaModel": {
    "id": "THING-Q1728687",
    "registryId": "vr.tr.kapok",
    "name": "kapok",
    "version": "0.1.0-research.1",
    "entryKind": "thing",
    "family": "Thing Registry",
    "domain": [
      "PHY.LIV"
    ],
    "status": "research-draft"
  },
  "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1728687/",
  "model": {
    "registry_id": "vr.tr.kapok",
    "name": "kapok",
    "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise kapok as a living tree, assess its condition and ecological context, and choose appropriate identification, care, harvesting or conservation actions.",
    "definition": "Kapok, interpreted here as the organism Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn. in the family Malvaceae, is a large tropical tree whose capsules contain seeds surrounded by lightweight, silky fibres.",
    "scope_statement": "This model provisionally treats vr.tr.kapok as the kapok tree commonly associated with Ceiba pentandra, owning the distinction between taxon, population and individual while leaving the registry's exact taxonomic intent open for verification.",
    "in_scope": [
      "Taxonomic identity and the use of kapok as a common name",
      "Recognition of living trees through vegetative and reproductive features",
      "Individual development, reproductive state and health",
      "Population occurrence, habitat, establishment and ecological interactions",
      "Care, propagation, seed collection and fruit harvesting from living trees"
    ],
    "out_of_scope": [
      "Extracted kapok fibre as a traded or engineered material",
      "Kapok-filled textiles, insulation and buoyancy products",
      "Processed timber, seed oil and other manufactured derivatives",
      "Other trees called kapok unless the registry explicitly includes them",
      "Land ownership, forestry businesses and harvesting equipment as independent entities"
    ],
    "distinguishing_features": [
      "Resolve the common name against a botanical identification; a label saying kapok alone cannot distinguish Ceiba pentandra from other trees sharing the name.",
      "For a candidate Ceiba pentandra, examine palmately compound leaves together with reproductive structures; leaf arrangement alone is insufficient.",
      "Check whether mature capsules contain seeds surrounded by floss, and document capsule and seed features to distinguish other floss-producing trees.",
      "Use trunk prickles and basal buttressing as supporting observations whose expression depends on age and growing conditions, rather than mandatory identification tests.",
      "Distinguish a rooted living tree, a taxonomic record and a detached fibre lot before applying condition assessments or deciding actions."
    ],
    "characteristics": [
      {
        "name": "Botanical identity",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Accepted scientific name, authority and date; unresolved identification permitted",
        "why_it_matters": "The common name may refer to different trees, so species-dependent guidance requires a resolved identity."
      },
      {
        "name": "Biological subject level",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Taxon | population | individual | attached organ | detached biological sample",
        "why_it_matters": "Prevents species-level conservation information from being mistaken for an individual tree's condition."
      },
      {
        "name": "Identification evidence",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Links to photographs, specimens, determinations and taxonomic references",
        "why_it_matters": "Makes an identification reviewable when flowers or fruits were unavailable."
      },
      {
        "name": "Leaf and reproductive morphology",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Observed leaflet arrangement and count; flower, capsule, seed and floss descriptions",
        "why_it_matters": "Supports separation from other trees bearing similar leaves or seed floss."
      },
      {
        "name": "Tree dimensions",
        "kind": "measurement",
        "unit_or_values": "Height and crown spread in m; trunk diameter in cm with measurement height and buttress treatment",
        "why_it_matters": "Supports growth and space assessments without treating measurements taken across buttresses as directly comparable."
      },
      {
        "name": "Developmental and seasonal state",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "Seedling | juvenile | reproductive adult; leaf, flower and fruit stages with observation dates",
        "why_it_matters": "Separates developmental limitations from seasonal absence of leaves or reproductive structures."
      },
      {
        "name": "Occurrence and establishment context",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Location linked to habitat, planting history and evidence of wild recruitment",
        "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a planted specimen from a self-replacing population."
      },
      {
        "name": "Individual condition",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "Observed crown vitality, wounds, decay indicators, root disturbance and reproductive performance",
        "why_it_matters": "Connects care decisions to the actual tree rather than to the reputation of the species."
      },
      {
        "name": "Conservation assessment context",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Assessment body, taxon, geographic scope, category and assessment year; unknown if unverified",
        "why_it_matters": "Keeps global taxon assessments separate from local population vulnerability."
      }
    ],
    "affordances": [
      "Identify a candidate kapok tree and request missing botanical evidence.",
      "Monitor growth, seasonal development and individual condition.",
      "Assess a planting site's space and habitat constraints against verified requirements.",
      "Plan propagation or seed collection using verified identity and reproductive timing.",
      "Evaluate fruit harvesting in relation to tree condition and local recruitment.",
      "Refer uncertain identity, structural defects or population decline for specialist assessment."
    ],
    "agent_conduct": {
      "may": [
        "Identify kapok trees and report their range, uses and status from botanical sources.",
        "Advise on harvesting fibre from pods on trees the agent is authorized to work with."
      ],
      "must_not": [
        "Fell or damage kapok trees that are protected or sacred without permission.",
        "Present kapok fibre products as tested or fire-safe without evidence.",
        "Leave people standing beneath trees during pod fall or high winds.",
        "Misstate product fibre content as kapok."
      ],
      "requires_human": [
        "Felling a large or culturally significant kapok tree."
      ]
    },
    "ethics": {
      "considerations": [
        "The tree is sacred in several cultures, including in Maya tradition.",
        "Large trees provide habitat and shade that communities value."
      ],
      "affected_parties": [
        "Local and Indigenous communities",
        "Wildlife",
        "Fibre harvesters"
      ]
    },
    "owners": {
      "steward": "The landholder where it grows; protected or sacred trees are held in common by their communities.",
      "master_systems": [
        "Herbaria and national plant databases"
      ]
    },
    "visual_identification": [
      "A very tall tree with a broad crown and large buttress roots.",
      "Young trunks often covered in conical spines.",
      "Hanging pods that split to release fluffy white fibre around the seeds."
    ],
    "failure_modes_and_hazards": [
      "Fibre is highly flammable.",
      "Falling pods and branches from tall trees.",
      "Spines on the trunk causing injuries."
    ],
    "what_it_is_for": [
      "Kapok fibre is collected from seed capsules and used as lightweight filling in cushions, pillows and other padded articles.",
      "It is also encountered in buoyant filling materials and research on insulation or absorbent materials."
    ],
    "standards_and_regulation": [
      "ISO 6938, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, provides generic names and definitions for natural fibres including kapok.",
      "Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011, issued by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, specifies textile fibre names and composition labelling requirements for textile products within its scope."
    ]
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "wikidata",
      "title": "Wikidata item Q1728687: kapok",
      "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1728687",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api"
    },
    {
      "id": "wikipedia-en",
      "title": "Wikipedia: Kapok fibre",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapok_fibre",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "general description of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink"
    }
  ],
  "structure": {
    "bundles": [
      {
        "id": "kapok-identity-and-boundaries",
        "name": "Kapok identity and boundaries",
        "description": "Resolve what kapok denotes and which biological subject an observation concerns.",
        "rationale": "Kapok can name a tree or its fibre, while the living-organism registry placement does not establish a species identity.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "common-name-resolution",
            "name": "Common-name resolution",
            "description": "Connect the registry name to a supported botanical concept.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "supported-kapok-determination",
                "name": "Supported kapok determination",
                "description": "Treat Ceiba pentandra as a candidate interpretation until registry provenance and botanical references establish the intended taxon.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Does the originating registry record identify Ceiba pentandra, another taxon, or kapok fibre?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "supported-kapok-determination-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which consulted authority supplies the accepted name, authorship, date and corresponding GBIF and NCBI identifiers?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "supported-kapok-determination-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "biological-subject-boundary",
            "name": "Biological subject boundary",
            "description": "Separate taxonomic claims from population, individual and product observations.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "tree-taxon-and-fibre-separation",
                "name": "Tree, taxon and fibre separation",
                "description": "Assign each observation to its biological subject and transfer processed-material properties to a neighbouring material model.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Is this record about the kapok taxon, a local population, one tree or detached seed floss?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "tree-taxon-and-fibre-separation-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "At what point does collected kapok become a fibre lot whose grading and processing belong to a material model?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "tree-taxon-and-fibre-separation-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "kapok-recognition-and-form",
        "name": "Kapok recognition and form",
        "description": "Organise the botanical observations needed to recognise a candidate kapok tree.",
        "rationale": "Floss production, buttressing or prickles alone do not provide a sufficiently reliable identification.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "vegetative-recognition",
            "name": "Vegetative recognition",
            "description": "Examine leaves and trunk form while accounting for age and seasonal state.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "leaf-and-trunk-evidence",
                "name": "Leaf and trunk evidence",
                "description": "Combine leaf architecture, bark, prickles and buttresses as supporting evidence with explicit uncertainty.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What leaflet arrangement, leaflet count, bark features, prickles and buttresses are visible on this tree?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "leaf-and-trunk-evidence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which locally occurring lookalikes remain possible when only these vegetative features are available?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "leaf-and-trunk-evidence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "reproductive-recognition",
            "name": "Reproductive recognition",
            "description": "Use flowers, capsules, seeds and floss to strengthen or revise the identification.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "capsule-seed-and-floss-evidence",
                "name": "Capsule, seed and floss evidence",
                "description": "Document reproductive structures as a linked set rather than identifying the tree from loose floss.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What flower, capsule, seed and floss features are documented, and were they collected directly from this tree?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "capsule-seed-and-floss-evidence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which reproductive characters in a consulted botanical key distinguish this candidate from other trees called kapok?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "capsule-seed-and-floss-evidence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "kapok-development-and-reproduction",
        "name": "Kapok development and reproduction",
        "description": "Track development, seasonal changes and the production of viable offspring.",
        "rationale": "A tree without leaves, flowers or fruit cannot be assessed correctly without its developmental and seasonal context.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "growth-and-seasonality",
            "name": "Growth and seasonality",
            "description": "Relate dimensions and crown changes to dated observations.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "developmental-state-and-growth",
                "name": "Developmental state and growth",
                "description": "Record life stage and repeated measurements without using size alone as a proxy for age or reproductive maturity.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What evidence places this kapok in the seedling, juvenile or reproductive-adult stage?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "developmental-state-and-growth-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "How have height, crown spread, consistently measured trunk diameter and leaf state changed between dated observations?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "developmental-state-and-growth-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "flowering-fruiting-and-recruitment",
            "name": "Flowering, fruiting and recruitment",
            "description": "Connect reproductive observations to seed viability and seedling establishment.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "reproductive-output-and-establishment",
                "name": "Reproductive output and establishment",
                "description": "Separate flowering, fruit production, viable seed production and successful recruitment.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "When does this population flower and mature capsules, and what evidence establishes floral sexual function or differences between individuals?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "reproductive-output-and-establishment-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Do released seeds produce surviving seedlings, and which observed conditions interrupt that sequence?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "reproductive-output-and-establishment-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "kapok-habitat-and-populations",
        "name": "Kapok habitat and populations",
        "description": "Place kapok occurrences within their environmental and population context.",
        "rationale": "Cultivation can obscure range interpretation, and the survival of a planted adult does not establish habitat suitability for recruitment.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "range-and-establishment",
            "name": "Range and establishment",
            "description": "Distinguish documented native occurrence, introduction and cultivation.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "occurrence-origin-and-habitat",
                "name": "Occurrence origin and habitat",
                "description": "Attach geographic status to evidence and describe the conditions surrounding each occurrence.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What source supports classifying this occurrence as native, introduced, planted or of uncertain origin?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "occurrence-origin-and-habitat-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What soil drainage, water availability, exposure and surrounding vegetation accompany adults and recruits at this location?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "occurrence-origin-and-habitat-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "ecological-interactions",
            "name": "Ecological interactions",
            "description": "Record organisms interacting with kapok and the evidence for their ecological roles.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "visitors-dispersal-and-dependence",
                "name": "Visitors, dispersal and dependence",
                "description": "Distinguish observed flower visitation, seed movement and tree use from demonstrated pollination, dispersal or dependence.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Which animals visit flowers or use the tree, and what evidence supports the role attributed to each?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "visitors-dispersal-and-dependence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What observations connect capsule opening and seed-floss movement with the locations of new seedlings?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "visitors-dispersal-and-dependence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "kapok-condition-and-stewardship",
        "name": "Kapok condition and stewardship",
        "description": "Connect individual condition and population evidence to justified interventions.",
        "rationale": "Tree care and fruit collection must account for a large living tree's condition and its contribution to local reproduction.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "individual-care-and-site-fit",
            "name": "Individual care and site fit",
            "description": "Assess crown, trunk, roots and available growing space before intervention.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "condition-led-intervention",
                "name": "Condition-led intervention",
                "description": "Use observable symptoms and site constraints to select monitoring, care or specialist assessment.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What crown decline, wounds, decay indicators, damaged roots or changes around the buttressed base are present?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "condition-led-intervention-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which verified care action addresses the observed condition, and does the tree's size or defect require specialist assessment?",
                    "kind": "action",
                    "id": "condition-led-intervention-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "harvest-and-conservation",
            "name": "Harvest and conservation",
            "description": "Relate seed or fruit collection to recruitment, permissions and the relevant conservation assessment.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "collection-with-population-context",
                "name": "Collection with population context",
                "description": "Keep individual harvest decisions grounded in local reproductive evidence and correctly scoped conservation information.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Which conservation assessment applies to the confirmed taxon, with what year and geographic scope, and what is known about this local population?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "collection-with-population-context-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What collection method and quantity are justified by permissions, tree condition, seed availability and observed recruitment?",
                    "kind": "action",
                    "id": "collection-with-population-context-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment",
        "name": "Evidence and external alignment",
        "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.",
        "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "reported-evidence",
            "name": "Reported evidence",
            "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "evidence-confidence-notes",
                "name": "Check these first",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "The organism interpretation follows domain PHY.LIV; without a recorded sense, the name could instead denote the commercial fibre.",
                  "Verify native-range boundaries, botanical publication date, database identifiers, and any IUCN assessment category and year before publication.",
                  "This is recalled knowledge, not researched evidence; growth dimensions vary with site and age."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-identifiers",
                "name": "Identifiers and schemes",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "scheme": "Botanical nomenclature",
                    "value_or_pattern": "Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn.",
                    "note": "Scientific species name with botanical author citation; kapok also names the fibre obtained from its fruits."
                  },
                  {
                    "scheme": "GBIF taxon key",
                    "value_or_pattern": "Numeric taxon identifier",
                    "note": "The species-specific value requires verification."
                  },
                  {
                    "scheme": "NCBI Taxonomy",
                    "value_or_pattern": "Numeric Taxonomy ID",
                    "note": "The species-specific value requires verification."
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation",
                "name": "Standards and regulation",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, adopted through International Botanical Congresses, governs the scientific naming of this plant."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-real-world-use",
                "name": "Real-world use",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Fruit fibres are used as stuffing for pillows, cushions and mattresses.",
                  "Buoyant kapok fibre has historically been used in flotation equipment.",
                  "The tree is planted for shade and as an ornamental.",
                  "Its lightweight wood is used for applications including plywood and packaging."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-measurements",
                "name": "Typical measurements",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "quantity": "Mature tree height",
                    "typical_range": "Approximately 20-60, with taller individuals reported",
                    "unit": "m"
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-measurements-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards",
                "name": "Failure modes and hazards",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Trunk and branch prickles can cause puncture injuries.",
                  "Dry harvested fibre is combustible.",
                  "Processing loose fibre can generate irritating airborne dust.",
                  "Large roots and buttresses can conflict with nearby paving and structures."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-regional-variation",
                "name": "Regional variation",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "The species occurs across tropical regions and is cultivated beyond its native range; native and introduced occurrences need to be distinguished.",
                  "Older botanical literature may place the species in Bombacaceae, whereas modern classifications include it in Malvaceae."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-neighbours",
                "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "name": "Kapok fibre",
                    "difference": "The harvested material consists of fruit-associated fibres; it is not the living tree or the species."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Ceiba",
                    "difference": "Ceiba is the genus containing multiple species; Ceiba pentandra is one species within it."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Bombax ceiba",
                    "difference": "A distinct species in another genus that also produces floss-filled fruits and may share silk-cotton vernacular names."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Individual kapok tree",
                    "difference": "An individual is one organism with a particular age and location; the species includes its populations collectively."
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of kapok this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "openQuestions": [
    "Does vr.tr.kapok specifically denote Ceiba pentandra, and what accepted authority, date, GBIF identifier and NCBI taxonomy identifier resolve that interpretation?",
    "Which names sharing kapok must be excluded, and which botanical characters reliably distinguish them at juvenile and non-flowering stages?",
    "What native range is supported by authoritative sources, and where do cultivation and historical introduction leave occurrence status uncertain?",
    "What are the confirmed taxon's reproductive system, regional flowering and fruiting patterns, effective pollinators and seed-establishment requirements?",
    "What IUCN assessment and assessment year apply, and what local evidence supports care, collection and conservation decisions?"
  ],
  "statistics": {
    "bundles": 6,
    "layers": 11,
    "findings": 18,
    "questions": 28
  }
}
