{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:37:25Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 23.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c2-9f0d-74e1-8c6a-502bbcbfa981\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: child-resistant packaging\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c2-9f0a-7430-b960-51f6972f0699\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: child-resistant packaging\nRegistry id: vr.tr.child-resistant-packaging\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folde" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:48:01+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1741803", "registryId": "vr.tr.child-resistant-packaging", "name": "child-resistant packaging", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1741803/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.child-resistant-packaging", "name": "child-resistant packaging", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify child-resistant packaging, assess whether its access barrier remains effective for its intended contents and users, and determine appropriate handling or replacement.", "definition": "Child-resistant packaging is packaging designed to be significantly difficult for young children to open or obtain a harmful quantity of its contents from, while remaining usable by adults, as assessed under specified test conditions.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the packaging system's child-access barrier, adult opening and reclosure requirements, configuration-specific performance evidence, and conditions that preserve or undermine protection.", "in_scope": [ "The complete package configuration, including container, closure, seals and access-control features", "Opening sequences and mechanisms intended to impede access by young children", "Adult usability, opening instructions and correct reclosure", "Evidence supporting child-resistance claims for a specified package configuration", "Damage, wear, substitution and use conditions that can compromise the barrier" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Toxicity, dosing and clinical management of the packaged contents", "General packaging manufacture and material formulation beyond effects on child resistance", "Household supervision and storage systems beyond their interface with package use", "Tamper evidence and counterfeit detection except where integrated with the access barrier", "Brand, product-line and individual inventory records" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify an access barrier intended to impede young children; a closure that merely prevents leakage does not establish child resistance.", "Distinguish evidence of child-access resistance from a tamper-evident seal that only reveals prior opening.", "Determine whether resistance depends on a particular container-and-closure combination rather than treating a cap alone as the complete system.", "Check whether protection persists through correct reclosure or applies to unopened compartments in a nonreclosable package.", "Separate a supported child-resistance claim from an assumption that the package is impossible for any child to open." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Package format", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Reclosable container; unit-dose blister or strip; pouch; other documented format", "why_it_matters": "The format determines which opening events and remaining contents require protection." }, { "name": "Access-barrier mechanism", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Coordinated push-and-turn; squeeze-and-turn; aligned release; multistep peel or tear; other documented mechanism", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the actions the package requires and the ways its barrier could be bypassed." }, { "name": "Validated component combination", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked container, closure, liner, film, seal and other relevant component specifications", "why_it_matters": "A claim for one assembly should not automatically transfer to substituted components." }, { "name": "Protective engagement state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Engaged; disengaged; partially engaged; damaged; indeterminate; not applicable after opening", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a package capable of providing protection from one currently left accessible." }, { "name": "Opening sequence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Ordered actions, required coordination and permitted aids recorded for the configuration", "why_it_matters": "Supports correct adult operation and assessment of unintended shortcuts." }, { "name": "Opening forces and torques", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "N and N·m, with method, package condition and applicable limits", "why_it_matters": "Helps assess mechanical consistency and usability without substituting for child-resistance testing." }, { "name": "Performance evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Test report linked to protocol edition, tested configuration, participant populations and results", "why_it_matters": "Makes the basis and limits of a child-resistance claim inspectable." }, { "name": "Adult-use performance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Successful opening and, where applicable, reclosure as percentages, with time limits and test population", "why_it_matters": "Protection must be considered alongside intended adults' ability to use the package correctly." }, { "name": "Contents compatibility", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked contents, fill conditions and compatibility evidence", "why_it_matters": "Contents and residues may affect seals, moving parts or material integrity." }, { "name": "Service exposure", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Opening cycles, elapsed service time and relevant environmental exposures in stated units", "why_it_matters": "Connects observed condition to the range covered by durability evidence." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify the opening and reclosure procedure for a documented package configuration.", "Inspect accessible barrier features and record whether protective engagement can be established.", "Compare a package assembly with the configuration covered by its performance evidence.", "Flag damage, substitutions or use conditions that require further assessment or replacement.", "Determine which unopened compartments or remaining contents retain a supported protective barrier.", "Retrieve applicable test evidence and unresolved questions before relying on a child-resistance claim." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Check that medicines and household chemicals are stored in their original child-resistant packaging.", "Remind users to reclose child-resistant closures fully after each use.", "Explain that child-resistant does not mean child-proof." ], "must_not": [ "Advise defeating or removing a child-resistant closure for convenience where children may be present.", "Describe packaging as child-resistant if it has not passed the applicable test.", "Help anyone get around child-resistant packaging to reach a dangerous product meant to be kept from them.", "Encourage moving medicines or chemicals into containers without child-resistant closures." ], "requires_human": [ "Supplying medicines in easy-open packaging to an older or disabled person who requests it." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Child-resistant packaging prevents many childhood poisonings, but only when used and closed properly.", "It must stay usable by older and disabled adults, or they may leave it open." ], "affected_parties": [ "Young children", "Older and disabled adults", "Parents and carers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The manufacturer or packer who selects and tests it; the regulator sets the requirement.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Push-and-turn or squeeze-and-turn caps, often with arrows or instructions moulded in.", "Blister packs with tear-resistant backing that must be peeled before pushing out a dose.", "Bottles of medicines, cleaning products, liquid nicotine or pesticides with a stiff two-action closure." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "A closure left loose or not fully engaged gives no protection.", "Products moved into ordinary containers lose their protection.", "Older adults who cannot open it may leave it unclosed or transfer the contents." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "ISO 8317, Child-resistant packaging - Requirements and testing procedures for reclosable packages, International Organization for Standardization.", "Poison Prevention Packaging Act, administered by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Child-resistant packaging is used for medicines, household chemicals and other contents that could harm young children if accessed.", "It provides an access barrier during distribution, storage and household use while allowing intended adult users to obtain the contents.", "Its protective function depends on package integrity and correct closure, and it does not eliminate the need for secure storage." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1741803: child-resistant packaging", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1741803", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Child-resistant packaging", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child-resistant_packaging", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "protected-access-boundary", "name": "Protected access boundary", "description": "Defines what constitutes the package system and what access its barrier is intended to prevent.", "rationale": "Child resistance concerns access to contents through a complete assembly, not the appearance or label of an isolated component.", "layers": [ { "id": "package-system", "name": "Package system", "description": "Identifies the components that jointly create the access barrier.", "findings": [ { "id": "barrier-component-boundary", "name": "Barrier component boundary", "description": "Record the complete configuration on which the protective claim depends.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which container, closure, liner, seal, film or insert components participate in restricting access?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "barrier-component-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Which configuration identifiers connect this assembly to its supporting evidence?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "barrier-component-boundary-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-endpoint", "name": "Access endpoint", "description": "Defines the protected contents and the event counted as obtaining access.", "findings": [ { "id": "protected-content-access", "name": "Protected content access", "description": "Specify whether the barrier protects a bulk contents space, individual doses or another defined quantity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What opening, extraction or exposure event counts as access under the relevant evidence?", "kind": "definition", "id": "protected-content-access-q01" }, { "text": "After one compartment is opened, which remaining compartments still have independent protection?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "protected-content-access-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "opening-and-reclosure", "name": "Opening and reclosure", "description": "Represents the mechanism, action sequence and protective states encountered during use.", "rationale": "A package can retain all its parts while losing protection through incomplete engagement or an unintended opening path.", "layers": [ { "id": "opening-mechanism", "name": "Opening mechanism", "description": "Describes the coordinated actions and physical barriers involved in intended opening.", "findings": [ { "id": "required-opening-actions", "name": "Required opening actions", "description": "Record the intended sequence and the mechanical conditions needed to complete it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which actions must occur together or in a prescribed order to release the barrier?", "kind": "definition", "id": "required-opening-actions-q01" }, { "text": "What forces, torques or displacements characterize intended opening, and how were they measured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "required-opening-actions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "protective-state-transitions", "name": "Protective state transitions", "description": "Tracks how opening and closing affect protection of the remaining contents.", "findings": [ { "id": "restoring-or-retaining-protection", "name": "Restoring or retaining protection", "description": "Distinguish full engagement, misleading partial closure and irreversible opening.", "questions": [ { "text": "For a reclosable package, what observable check establishes that the child-resistant mechanism has re-engaged?", "kind": "action", "id": "restoring-or-retaining-protection-q01" }, { "text": "Which opening or closing states leave contents accessible despite the package appearing closed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "restoring-or-retaining-protection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "child-resistance-evidence", "name": "Child-resistance evidence", "description": "Organizes the basis, applicability and limits of performance claims.", "rationale": "Child resistance cannot be established from mechanism description or opening force alone.", "layers": [ { "id": "claim-applicability", "name": "Claim applicability", "description": "Connects a claim to its jurisdiction, product context and assessment method.", "findings": [ { "id": "applicable-assessment-basis", "name": "Applicable assessment basis", "description": "Record the exact requirement or voluntary protocol used without assuming universal applicability.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which jurisdiction, contents category and package format determine the applicable requirements?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "applicable-assessment-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which issuing body, protocol title and edition support the stated child-resistance claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "applicable-assessment-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "test-coverage", "name": "Test coverage", "description": "Captures what was tested and the conditions under which results apply.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-specific-results", "name": "Configuration-specific results", "description": "Tie outcomes to tested specimens, participant groups, procedures and acceptance criteria.", "questions": [ { "text": "What child-access and adult-use outcomes were measured against which acceptance criteria?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "configuration-specific-results-q01" }, { "text": "Which report establishes the tested components, conditioning, instructions and opening-attempt procedure?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-specific-results-q02" }, { "text": "Which differences between the tested configuration and the proposed package lack supporting evidence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "configuration-specific-results-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "adult-use-and-instructions", "name": "Adult use and instructions", "description": "Addresses intended adults' ability to open the package and preserve protection afterward.", "rationale": "Difficult or unclear operation can prevent access to needed contents or encourage practices that defeat the barrier.", "layers": [ { "id": "adult-operability", "name": "Adult operability", "description": "Records the physical and perceptual demands of correct use.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-user-capabilities", "name": "Intended user capabilities", "description": "Relate opening and reclosure demands to the adults expected to use the package.", "questions": [ { "text": "What grip, dexterity, coordination and visual demands does the opening sequence impose?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intended-user-capabilities-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence covers opening and correct reclosure by the intended adult population?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-user-capabilities-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-guidance", "name": "Use guidance", "description": "Connects package markings and feedback to correct operation.", "findings": [ { "id": "instructions-and-defeating-workarounds", "name": "Instructions and defeating workarounds", "description": "Record usable instructions and observed practices that remove the protective barrier.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which instructions explain opening, reclosure and verification of engagement for this configuration?", "kind": "action", "id": "instructions-and-defeating-workarounds-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence identifies confusion or workarounds such as leaving the closure loose or transferring contents?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "instructions-and-defeating-workarounds-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "barrier-integrity-through-use", "name": "Barrier integrity through use", "description": "Assesses whether materials, assembly and repeated use preserve the supported protective function.", "rationale": "Wear, contents interaction and component changes can undermine a barrier that initially met its performance criteria.", "layers": [ { "id": "damage-and-degradation", "name": "Damage and degradation", "description": "Identifies deterioration relevant to restricted access.", "findings": [ { "id": "barrier-compromise-indicators", "name": "Barrier compromise indicators", "description": "Record damage and exposure conditions that may affect locking, sealing or compartment separation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which cracks, worn engagement features, punctures, delamination or residues can compromise this mechanism?", "kind": "definition", "id": "barrier-compromise-indicators-q01" }, { "text": "What cycle counts, ageing conditions and contents exposures are covered by durability evidence?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "barrier-compromise-indicators-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "configuration-control-and-disposition", "name": "Configuration control and disposition", "description": "Guides decisions when components, condition or evidence no longer match the supported configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "changes-and-replacement-decisions", "name": "Changes and replacement decisions", "description": "Identify changes requiring assessment and evidence needed to continue relying on protection.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which component substitutions, material changes, refill practices or assembly adjustments require reassessment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "changes-and-replacement-decisions-q01" }, { "text": "What documented criteria require replacement or withdrawal when protective engagement or integrity cannot be established?", "kind": "action", "id": "changes-and-replacement-decisions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This is a recall-based description; no sources were consulted.", "Check current standard editions, jurisdictional requirements and product-specific exemptions before assessing compliance.", "Child resistance belongs to a tested package configuration; mechanism names alone do not establish performance." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Reclosable containers with push-and-turn closures", "Reclosable containers with squeeze-and-turn closures", "Non-reclosable child-resistant blister packs", "Child-resistant unit-dose pouches or sachets", "Reclosable flexible packages with child-resistant opening mechanisms" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "ISO 8317, issued by the International Organization for Standardization: requirements and testing procedures for reclosable child-resistant packaging.", "ISO 28862, issued by the International Organization for Standardization: requirements and testing procedures for non-reclosable child-resistant packaging for non-pharmaceutical products.", "EN 14375, issued by the European Committee for Standardization: requirements and testing for non-reclosable child-resistant packaging for pharmaceutical products.", "ASTM D3475, issued by ASTM International: classification of child-resistant packages.", "United States Poison Prevention Packaging Act and implementing regulations in 16 CFR Part 1700, administered by the Consumer Product Safety Commission." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Packaging medicines to reduce accidental ingestion by children.", "Packaging household chemicals subject to child-resistant packaging requirements.", "Containing liquid nicotine products.", "Packaging certain pesticide products.", "Containing concentrated laundry detergent capsules." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Proportion of children unable to open the package or access the specified contents during a prescribed test", "typical_range": "Acceptance thresholds depend on the applicable standard and test stage.", "unit": "%" }, { "quantity": "Proportion of adults able to open and, where applicable, properly reclose the package during a prescribed test", "typical_range": "Acceptance thresholds depend on the applicable standard and adult test population.", "unit": "%" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Incomplete reclosing leaves the child-resistant mechanism disengaged.", "Wear, damage or manufacturing variation compromises the opening mechanism.", "A mismatched closure and container defeats the performance of the tested package system.", "Adults bypass difficult closures or transfer contents into accessible containers.", "Children can sometimes defeat compliant packaging; child-resistant does not mean childproof." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The United States uses product-specific requirements under the Poison Prevention Packaging Act and related regulations.", "European requirements distinguish pharmaceutical packaging from other hazardous-product packaging and use different standards for reclosable and non-reclosable formats.", "Products requiring child-resistant packaging, exemptions and accepted test methods vary by jurisdiction." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Tamper-evident packaging", "difference": "Provides visible evidence of opening or interference; it need not resist opening by children." }, { "name": "Child-resistant closure", "difference": "Is a component; packaging performance depends on its combination with the container and other relevant package features." }, { "name": "Unit-dose packaging", "difference": "Separates contents into individual doses but is not necessarily child-resistant." }, { "name": "Accessible packaging", "difference": "Emphasizes ease of use; child-resistant packaging must reconcile adult usability with resistance to children's access." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of child-resistant packaging this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which primary standards and regulatory definitions should anchor this model across jurisdictions and package formats?", "How do applicable protocols define child access, participant populations, adult usability and acceptance thresholds?", "What evidence permits performance results to extend across package sizes, component variants, contents and fill levels?", "Which inspection indicators reliably identify lost protection, and which failures require testing beyond visual or manual checks?", "How should the model represent reusable, refillable and convertible closures whose protective mode can change during service?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 29 } }