{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:40:23Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c4-f66f-78b1-b3e0-d49cf4dbae70\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Cholet\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 register", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 93.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094c4-f67f-7993-88d8-d00e7bbe2e42\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Cholet\nRegistry id: vr.tr.cholet\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext fo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T15:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T10:49:22+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:26+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q17625141", "registryId": "vr.tr.cholet", "name": "Cholet", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q17625141/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.cholet", "name": "Cholet", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, compare and responsibly describe Cholet architecture through documented design features, spatial organisation, cultural interpretations and contested definitions.", "definition": "Cholet is an architectural style developed in Bolivia, chiefly in El Alto, known for colourful multi-storey buildings with ornate facades that combine Andean motifs with modern materials; it is also called neo-Andean architecture.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Cholet as an architectural style and category of practice developed in Bolivia, matching the registry's linked entity [Wikidata Q17625141](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17625141); it records criteria for attributing examples without treating the style, an individual building and its cultural interpretation as interchangeable.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions and attributed uses of Cholet, Neo-Andean architecture and related labels", "Facade, interior and spatial features used to recognise proposed examples", "Relationships between architectural expression, building programme and patronage", "Documented cultural references and interpretations by designers, owners, users and critics", "Authorship, geographical variation and changes to attributed examples" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The French commune of Cholet and its municipal affairs", "Complete biographies or catalogues of individual architects", "Structural engineering, building certification and construction specifications", "Aymara culture or Andean architectural history as a whole", "Property valuation, ownership administration and event-venue operations" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Resolve the referent to the Bolivian architectural category before accepting a name match with Cholet.", "Require documented attribution or an explicit comparison with referenced examples; vivid colour alone does not establish membership.", "Record facade, interior and spatial organisation separately so a decorated frontage does not stand as evidence for an entire building programme.", "Distinguish attribution to the Cholet category from attribution to Freddy Mamani; evidence for one does not establish the other.", "Separate a source's identification of Andean references from an agent's visual resemblance judgment." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Architectural attribution", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "documented; proposed; contested; rejected; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to report confidence and disagreement without inventing a universal definition." }, { "name": "Label and speaker", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "term linked to speaker, source, date and referent", "why_it_matters": "Preserves differences between a designer's preferred terminology and labels applied by others." }, { "name": "Design authorship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "identified designer or workshop; attribution evidence; disputed or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents assigning every proposed Cholet example to the best-known practitioner." }, { "name": "Architectural evidence coverage", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "facade; interior; plans; section; site observation; combinations", "why_it_matters": "Makes clear which parts of a building support its classification." }, { "name": "Vertical programme", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "floor or zone linked to documented commercial, gathering, residential or other use", "why_it_matters": "Supports examination of mixed uses and rooftop residences without assuming a fixed arrangement." }, { "name": "Attributed cultural reference", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "feature linked to stated reference, interpreter and supporting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps reported meanings distinct from speculative readings of geometric ornament." }, { "name": "Documented design phase", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "proposed; under construction; completed; altered; partly removed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents comparisons that silently mix original designs, renderings and later alterations." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess whether a proposed example has sufficient evidence for a Cholet attribution.", "Compare examples by facade composition, interior treatment and spatial programme.", "Explain disagreements over naming or membership with each position attributed.", "Request missing plans, interior documentation or authorship evidence before strengthening a claim.", "Trace documented changes in an example's architectural expression.", "Prepare a design or interpretation brief grounded in specific references and stakeholder accounts." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the cholet style and its typical features from architecture and heritage sources.", "Identify a building as cholet only where its facade and design match documented examples of the style.", "Point to published studies, exhibitions and municipal records about the style in El Alto." ], "must_not": [ "Present the style as folklore or kitsch in a way that demeans the Aymara communities who commission and build it.", "Attribute a specific building to a named architect without a documented source.", "Publish the owners, addresses or family details of private residences without consent.", "Confuse the Bolivian style with the French commune of the same name." ], "requires_human": [ "Any heritage listing, valuation or planning decision about a cholet building." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "The style expresses the identity and success of an Indigenous urban community and deserves respectful description.", "Many cholets are family homes, so attention to them must respect privacy." ], "affected_parties": [ "Aymara families who own and use the buildings", "Builders and architects of El Alto", "Residents of El Alto" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The owner of each building; the municipality keeps building and planning records.", "master_systems": [ "Municipal building and planning records of El Alto" ] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "This architectural style is encountered chiefly in El Alto, Bolivia, in buildings associated with neo-Andean design.", "Buildings often combine commercial premises, event spaces and residential accommodation within a single multi-storey structure.", "The style is discussed in architecture and cultural studies through its spatial arrangements, Andean references and expressions of social identity." ], "visual_identification": [ "Facades often use saturated contrasting colours and large geometric compositions.", "Angular or stepped decorative motifs evoke Andean visual traditions.", "Elaborate event interiors may feature repeated geometric ornament, mirrors and prominent decorative lighting.", "Some buildings have a distinct house-like residence above a larger commercial or event-space base." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Visual ornament alone can lead to incorrect attribution of a building's style, authorship or cultural meaning.", "Assuming that a stylistic label guarantees structural or fire safety can conceal building-specific risks.", "Reductive descriptions can stereotype communities and misrepresent the diversity of Andean architectural practices." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No specific standard or official classification is asserted for this architectural style because applicable building regulations depend on the individual building and jurisdiction." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q17625141: Cholet", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17625141", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Neo-Andean", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Andean", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "cholet-definition-and-naming", "name": "Cholet definition and naming", "description": "Resolve what different sources mean when they classify architecture as Cholet.", "rationale": "The model needs an explicit boundary between a style label, a building type and broader Neo-Andean practice.", "layers": [ { "id": "label-usage", "name": "Label usage", "description": "Record who uses each architectural label and what it denotes.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-definitions", "name": "Attributed definitions", "description": "Maintain source-specific definitions instead of silently making related architectural labels equivalent.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this source use Cholet for a style, a mixed-use building type, a particular body of work or something else?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-definitions-q01" }, { "text": "Who uses this term, when, and do the designer or occupants use the same label?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-definitions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "membership-tests", "name": "Membership tests", "description": "Make acceptance and exclusion criteria inspectable.", "findings": [ { "id": "cholet-attribution-threshold", "name": "Cholet attribution threshold", "description": "Evaluate candidate examples using an attributed definition and evidence rather than name or colour alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented features or explicit attributions support including this example?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cholet-attribution-threshold-q01" }, { "text": "Would the selected definition include a similarly decorated building with a different spatial programme or cultural context?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cholet-attribution-threshold-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "architectural-expression", "name": "Architectural expression", "description": "Describe the exterior and interior evidence used in recognising Cholet examples.", "rationale": "Recognition requires concrete architectural observations while avoiding unsupported interpretations of ornament.", "layers": [ { "id": "facade-composition", "name": "Facade composition", "description": "Inspect the arrangement of colour, geometry, openings, relief and building silhouette.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-exterior-vocabulary", "name": "Documented exterior vocabulary", "description": "Record observable features and compare them with identified reference buildings.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which geometric arrangements, colour relationships, relief elements and roof forms are visible in dated documentation?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "documented-exterior-vocabulary-q01" }, { "text": "Which referenced Cholet examples support the comparison, and which apparent similarities are too general to distinguish the style?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-exterior-vocabulary-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interior-expression", "name": "Interior expression", "description": "Examine interior composition independently of the public frontage.", "findings": [ { "id": "interior-and-exterior-relationship", "name": "Interior and exterior relationship", "description": "Determine whether interior geometry, lighting and decoration support or qualify a facade-based attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "What interior evidence documents ceiling forms, columns, lighting, colour and ornament?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "interior-and-exterior-relationship-q01" }, { "text": "Does the interior continue, reinterpret or depart from the architectural vocabulary visible outside?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "interior-and-exterior-relationship-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "spatial-programme", "name": "Spatial programme", "description": "Examine how proposed Cholet examples combine activities and organise access.", "rationale": "A model must establish whether spatial organisation contributes to attribution instead of reducing Cholet to surface appearance.", "layers": [ { "id": "stacked-uses", "name": "Stacked uses", "description": "Map the actual distribution of commercial, gathering and residential spaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "programme-and-rooftop-dwelling", "name": "Programme and rooftop dwelling", "description": "Test the relevance of mixed uses and a rooftop dwelling without declaring either universally mandatory.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which uses occupy each level, and is a distinct rooftop residence documented?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "programme-and-rooftop-dwelling-q01" }, { "text": "Under the cited definition, does absence of a gathering hall or rooftop residence exclude the example or identify a variant?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "programme-and-rooftop-dwelling-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "public-private-organisation", "name": "Public and private organisation", "description": "Record how building users enter, circulate and share spaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "programme-connections", "name": "Programme connections", "description": "Identify how different uses coexist through entrances, circulation and thresholds.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are visitors, commercial users and residents routed between entrances and occupied levels?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "programme-connections-q01" }, { "text": "Which plans or observations are needed before describing the relationship between gathering spaces and private accommodation?", "kind": "action", "id": "programme-connections-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cultural-meaning-and-reception", "name": "Cultural meaning and reception", "description": "Keep cultural interpretations, patron intentions and critical judgments attributable.", "rationale": "An agent must be able to discuss identity and architectural disagreement without treating a visual motif as proof of ethnicity or shared belief.", "layers": [ { "id": "cultural-reference", "name": "Cultural reference", "description": "Connect claimed Andean references to specific features and testimony.", "findings": [ { "id": "meaning-with-attribution", "name": "Meaning with attribution", "description": "Separate maker explanations, user interpretations and external readings of architectural features.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which particular features are linked to Aymara, Tiwanaku, textile or other references, and by whom?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "meaning-with-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Is the claimed reference supported by maker testimony, historical comparison or only visual resemblance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "meaning-with-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "patronage-and-debate", "name": "Patronage and debate", "description": "Record the intentions and evaluations attached to proposed Cholet architecture.", "findings": [ { "id": "competing-evaluations", "name": "Competing evaluations", "description": "Represent disagreements about architectural value, social meaning and terminology as attributed positions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What do the patron, designer and occupants say the building is intended to express or enable?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competing-evaluations-q01" }, { "text": "Which sources disagree about its architectural value or the appropriateness of the Cholet label, and what criteria do they use?", "kind": "definition", "id": "competing-evaluations-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-variation-and-change", "name": "Authorship, variation and change", "description": "Track differences between practitioners, locations and documented phases of examples.", "rationale": "The category needs room for evidenced variation without assigning all examples to one architect or treating later alterations as original design.", "layers": [ { "id": "design-lineages", "name": "Design lineages", "description": "Distinguish authorship from resemblance and influence.", "findings": [ { "id": "practitioner-and-place-attribution", "name": "Practitioner and place attribution", "description": "Link examples to documented designers and locations while leaving unsupported influence claims unresolved.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence identifies the designer or workshop, including any claimed connection to Freddy Mamani?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "practitioner-and-place-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Which differences between examples in El Alto and elsewhere reflect documented local adaptation rather than assumed imitation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "practitioner-and-place-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "architectural-change", "name": "Architectural change", "description": "Assess how alterations affect the evidence for an example's classification.", "findings": [ { "id": "attribution-through-alteration", "name": "Attribution through alteration", "description": "Compare dated states before revising an attribution or preparing an intervention brief.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which facade, interior or programme features have changed since the earliest documented state?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "attribution-through-alteration-q01" }, { "text": "Before proposing alterations, which attributed features and owner or designer intentions need documentation to assess their significance?", "kind": "action", "id": "attribution-through-alteration-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The ACT.ACT domain and abstract-concept batch context do not clearly support the geographic interpretation; check the originating registry identifier before adopting it.", "The French place name and the Bolivian architectural term must not be merged.", "This response uses recalled knowledge; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Cholet this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "INSEE commune code", "value_or_pattern": "49099", "note": "Identifies the French commune of Cholet." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Cholet this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Municipal administration and geographic reference.", "Historically associated with textile manufacturing." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Cholet this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "cholet", "difference": "In Bolivian architectural usage, a cholet is a type of elaborate building associated with El Alto, rather than the French commune." }, { "name": "Cholet Basket", "difference": "A basketball club named for the city, rather than the city itself." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Cholet this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "When do practitioners and researchers treat Cholet and Neo-Andean architecture as equivalent, and when does Cholet denote a narrower building type?", "Which combinations of architectural features provide defensible membership criteria across examples by different designers?", "How do designers, owners and occupants differ in their acceptance and interpretation of the Cholet label?", "Which proposed cultural references have direct testimony or historical evidence, and which remain outside interpretations?", "Does the registry's ACT / ACT.ACT placement adequately represent an architectural style, or does its classification need review while retaining this entry's identity?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 14, "questions": 24 } }