{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:54:16Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d2-1523-7703-903a-4748054ec2c0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Criminal Investigation Department\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: SOC.ORG\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 66.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d2-1520-7d82-86c2-26f8916b1713\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Criminal Investigation Department\nRegistry id: vr.tr.criminal-investigation-department\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.ORG\nRegistry definition: (none recor" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:46:15+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q18197265", "registryId": "vr.tr.criminal-investigation-department", "name": "Criminal Investigation Department", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.ORG" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q18197265/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.criminal-investigation-department", "name": "Criminal Investigation Department", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify a Criminal Investigation Department, assess its investigative capacity and accountability, and determine which actions require referral, authorization or oversight.", "definition": "A Criminal Investigation Department is a police organisational unit, commonly abbreviated CID, assigned responsibility for investigating designated criminal offences within its parent force's jurisdiction.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the organizational identity, criminal investigation mandate, jurisdiction, command arrangements, operational capacity and accountability of a department designated to investigate crime, without assuming a particular country, independent legal personality or set of police powers.", "in_scope": [ "Department identity, parent organization, founding authority and organizational continuity", "Offence remit, territorial jurisdiction and rules for accepting or transferring investigations", "Command structure, investigative roles and decision rights", "Investigative capacity, specialist support and organizational control of evidence", "Oversight, complaints, information access and institutional lifecycle" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Detailed facts, evidence and procedural history of individual criminal cases", "Personal identities and employment histories of individual investigators", "Prosecution decisions, court proceedings and judicial findings", "General patrol, emergency response and public order operations outside the department's mandate", "Police buildings, equipment specifications and forensic methods as independently modeled things" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An identifiable organizational unit must carry the criminal investigation mandate; a building, occupational title or informal group of detectives does not establish a department.", "The designation must be tied to a particular jurisdiction and parent institution; the name alone does not establish a globally uniform organization.", "Its remit must distinguish criminal investigation responsibilities from general policing, intelligence collection and prosecution.", "Its authority must be traceable to applicable instruments and delegations; departmental membership alone does not establish authority to search, arrest or access restricted information.", "Separate legal personality must be established rather than inferred from the word 'Department'; identity may instead depend on its position within a parent police organization." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Organizational designation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Official name, abbreviation, local-language designation and recognized historical names", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes the department from similarly named units and records renaming without inventing a new institution." }, { "name": "Parent and legal identity", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Parent police or governmental body; separate legal personality established, absent or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Locates institutional responsibility and determines which entity holds formal obligations." }, { "name": "Investigative remit", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented offence classes, seriousness thresholds, exclusions and referral conditions", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether a proposed investigation falls within the department's mandate." }, { "name": "Jurisdiction", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Territories, persons or institutions covered, with effective dates and overlapping authorities", "why_it_matters": "Prevents treating competence in one setting as authority in another." }, { "name": "Authority and delegation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Investigative action linked to authorizing instrument, eligible role, approval conditions and validity period", "why_it_matters": "Separates an organizational responsibility from permission to perform a particular action." }, { "name": "Investigative staffing capacity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Authorized and available investigator full-time equivalents, by specialty and reporting date", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of whether assigned investigations can receive appropriate staffing." }, { "name": "Active caseload", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Count of active investigations by case category, age band and reporting date", "why_it_matters": "Makes workload visible while preserving differences in complexity and reporting conventions." }, { "name": "Operational status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Establishing, operational, restricted, reorganizing, merged, dissolved or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Indicates whether responsibilities remain executable and where unfinished obligations move." } ], "affordances": [ "Match a department name to its jurisdiction, parent institution and documented organizational lineage.", "Assess whether a proposed referral fits the recorded investigative remit and identify unresolved jurisdiction questions.", "Identify the documented authority and approval route required for a proposed investigative action.", "Compare recorded staffing, specialist access and caseload to flag capacity gaps for human review.", "Locate the responsible evidence custodian, disclosure authority or complaints channel.", "Trace responsibility for ongoing investigations and retained records after reorganization." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the role of a CID and how members of the public can report crimes to it.", "Help a person find official police contact routes and victim support." ], "must_not": [ "Impersonate detectives or police to obtain information or entry.", "Conduct its own investigations into people or gather evidence covertly for others.", "Publish details of ongoing investigations, suspects or victims.", "Accuse named people of crimes on the basis of rumours." ], "requires_human": [ "Reporting a crime or passing evidence to police." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Criminal investigations affect liberty and reputation; the presumption of innocence must hold.", "Victims and witnesses need protection from exposure." ], "affected_parties": [ "Victims and witnesses", "Suspects", "Officers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The police force it belongs to, under its chief officer and oversight bodies.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Police impersonation is used to defraud and harm people.", "Leaked investigation details endanger witnesses and prejudice trials." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Parliament of the United Kingdom, for units in England and Wales." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "A Criminal Investigation Department operates within a police force to investigate offences assigned to its remit.", "It is encountered in crime reporting, evidence coordination, investigative referrals and liaison with prosecutors or other police units." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "An investigative department is an organizational unit without an intrinsic visual appearance that reliably distinguishes it from other police units." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q18197265: Criminal Investigation Department", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18197265", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Criminal Investigation Department", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Investigation_Department", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "department-identity-and-continuity", "name": "Department identity and continuity", "description": "Establishes which institution the designation identifies and how its identity persists through organizational change.", "rationale": "A CID designation can identify a subordinate unit or a differently constituted body; the name cannot settle institutional identity.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-placement", "name": "Institutional placement", "description": "Locates the department within the relevant policing and governmental structure.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognized-department", "name": "Recognized department", "description": "Record the official designation, establishment record, parent body and any evidence of separate legal personality.", "questions": [ { "text": "What establishes this body as a Criminal Investigation Department rather than an informal investigative team?", "kind": "definition", "id": "recognized-department-q01" }, { "text": "Which official instrument or organizational record identifies its parent body and legal standing?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recognized-department-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "organizational-succession", "name": "Organizational succession", "description": "Tracks changes that affect the continuity of investigative responsibilities.", "findings": [ { "id": "mandate-and-records-transfer", "name": "Mandate and records transfer", "description": "Record renaming, merger or dissolution together with the destination of open investigations, evidence and retained records.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does a reported organizational change preserve this department's identity or establish a successor?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "mandate-and-records-transfer-q01" }, { "text": "Who assumes responsibility for open cases, evidence custody and record access when the department ceases operating?", "kind": "action", "id": "mandate-and-records-transfer-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "investigative-remit-and-jurisdiction", "name": "Investigative remit and jurisdiction", "description": "Defines the investigations the department may accept and its relationship to other competent bodies.", "rationale": "The label CID does not by itself determine offence coverage, territorial reach or priority over other investigators.", "layers": [ { "id": "case-eligibility", "name": "Case eligibility", "description": "Identifies the criteria for assigning criminal investigations to the department.", "findings": [ { "id": "offence-and-referral-boundaries", "name": "Offence and referral boundaries", "description": "Record offence categories, complexity or seriousness thresholds, exclusions and referral requirements.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which alleged offences or investigative circumstances qualify a case for this department?", "kind": "definition", "id": "offence-and-referral-boundaries-q01" }, { "text": "Which matters remain with local investigators or pass to another specialist agency?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "offence-and-referral-boundaries-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "overlapping-competence", "name": "Overlapping competence", "description": "Describes territorial and institutional overlaps affecting investigative responsibility.", "findings": [ { "id": "lead-and-transfer-rules", "name": "Lead and transfer rules", "description": "Record how a lead investigator organization is selected and how cases cross jurisdictional boundaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where does this department's competence end or overlap with another police, national or specialist body?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "lead-and-transfer-rules-q01" }, { "text": "What documented process determines investigative leadership, assistance or transfer when competence overlaps?", "kind": "action", "id": "lead-and-transfer-rules-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "command-and-investigative-authority", "name": "Command and investigative authority", "description": "Connects investigative responsibilities to command roles, permissions and external approvals.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish the ability to assign investigative work from lawful authority to take a specific investigative measure.", "layers": [ { "id": "case-command", "name": "Case command", "description": "Identifies who controls case assignment, supervision and escalation.", "findings": [ { "id": "investigation-decision-rights", "name": "Investigation decision rights", "description": "Record the roles authorized to accept, assign, review, suspend or recommend closure of investigations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which roles may accept a referral, appoint an investigation lead and approve changes in investigative direction?", "kind": "action", "id": "investigation-decision-rights-q01" }, { "text": "Which decisions belong to departmental command, prosecutors, courts or another authority?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "investigation-decision-rights-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "powers-and-approvals", "name": "Powers and approvals", "description": "Captures action-specific authority and the conditions under which personnel may exercise it.", "findings": [ { "id": "authorized-investigative-measures", "name": "Authorized investigative measures", "description": "Record the basis and approval conditions for measures such as searches, arrests, surveillance and restricted data access without presuming that the department possesses them.", "questions": [ { "text": "What current instrument supports each claimed investigative power, and to which personnel does it apply?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authorized-investigative-measures-q01" }, { "text": "What warrant, consent, supervisory approval or other prerequisite must be verified before a proposed measure proceeds?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorized-investigative-measures-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "investigative-capacity-and-evidence-stewardship", "name": "Investigative capacity and evidence stewardship", "description": "Assesses the department's ability to carry investigations and maintain accountable control of investigative material.", "rationale": "Formal competence is insufficient if specialist support is unavailable or responsibility for evidence is unclear.", "layers": [ { "id": "workload-and-specialist-support", "name": "Workload and specialist support", "description": "Relates assigned investigations to available personnel and supporting services.", "findings": [ { "id": "deployable-investigation-capacity", "name": "Deployable investigation capacity", "description": "Record available investigators, relevant competencies, workload and access to forensic, digital and analytical support.", "questions": [ { "text": "How many investigators are available by specialty, and how is their active workload measured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "deployable-investigation-capacity-q01" }, { "text": "Which required capabilities are internal, shared or externally requested, and how is access arranged?", "kind": "action", "id": "deployable-investigation-capacity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-case-information-control", "name": "Evidence and case information control", "description": "Defines departmental responsibility for material received, produced or transferred during investigations.", "findings": [ { "id": "custody-access-and-disclosure", "name": "Custody, access and disclosure", "description": "Record organizational controls for evidence custody, case information access, retention and authorized disclosure; individual evidence histories belong to case models.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which unit is accountable for evidence custody and case records at each organizational handoff?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "custody-access-and-disclosure-q01" }, { "text": "Who may authorize access, disclosure, retention changes or disposal, and what audit record is required?", "kind": "action", "id": "custody-access-and-disclosure-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "investigative-accountability-and-review", "name": "Investigative accountability and review", "description": "Makes investigative quality, rights safeguards and independent scrutiny assessable.", "rationale": "Departmental performance must include the defensibility of investigative conduct and routes for challenge.", "layers": [ { "id": "quality-and-outcome-review", "name": "Quality and outcome review", "description": "Captures how investigative work is reviewed and how reported outcomes are defined.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretable-investigation-performance", "name": "Interpretable investigation performance", "description": "Record review findings and workload or outcome indicators with definitions that distinguish departmental actions from prosecution and court decisions.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are backlog, investigation duration, clearance and case quality defined and measured here?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "interpretable-investigation-performance-q01" }, { "text": "Which reported outcomes are attributable to the department, and which depend on prosecutors, courts or other bodies?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "interpretable-investigation-performance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "safeguards-and-independent-scrutiny", "name": "Safeguards and independent scrutiny", "description": "Identifies controls and escalation routes for alleged misconduct, conflicts of interest and failures to protect affected people.", "findings": [ { "id": "complaints-and-conflict-escalation", "name": "Complaints and conflict escalation", "description": "Record applicable safeguards, complaint recipients and arrangements for investigations involving departmental personnel or compromised independence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented safeguards govern the department's treatment of suspects, victims, witnesses and confidential sources?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "complaints-and-conflict-escalation-q01" }, { "text": "Where must an allegation against department personnel or a conflict affecting an investigation be referred?", "kind": "action", "id": "complaints-and-conflict-escalation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The name does not identify a unique institution; the intended country, parent force and registry entity should be checked first.", "A CID often lacks separate legal personality, so registration identifiers and founding instruments may belong to its parent organisation.", "Mandate, investigative powers, governance and applicable procedural rules require jurisdiction-specific verification; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "National-level criminal investigation department", "State or provincial criminal investigation department", "Local police criminal investigation department" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Organisational abbreviation", "value_or_pattern": "CID", "note": "Widely used but not unique; identifying a particular department requires its jurisdiction and parent police organisation." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Investigating serious or complex offences assigned to the department", "Gathering and assessing evidence and developing investigative leads", "Interviewing witnesses, victims and suspects", "Coordinating forensic examinations and specialist investigative support", "Preparing case files for prosecutorial review or court proceedings" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Evidence contamination, loss or broken chains of custody", "Confirmation bias and premature focus on a suspect", "Coercive interviewing or other violations of procedural rights", "Corruption, political interference or conflicts of interest", "Poor coordination or case backlogs that delay investigations" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In the United Kingdom, CID commonly denotes detective units within individual police forces.", "In India, CID commonly denotes a state-level investigative branch, with responsibilities that vary by state.", "In other jurisdictions using the name, CID may be a national department or a subordinate police unit; the title alone does not establish its powers." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Police force", "difference": "A police force has a broader policing mandate; a CID generally performs an investigative function within it." }, { "name": "Criminal investigation", "difference": "Criminal investigation is an activity or process; a CID is an organisational unit that conducts it." }, { "name": "Detective", "difference": "A detective is a role or individual officer; a CID is a department that may employ detectives." }, { "name": "Forensic science laboratory", "difference": "A forensic laboratory examines evidence using scientific methods; a CID manages investigations and draws on laboratory findings." }, { "name": "Prosecution service", "difference": "A prosecution service conducts prosecutions; a CID primarily investigates alleged offences, although procedural responsibilities vary." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Criminal Investigation Department this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry entry denote the general organizational kind or a particular country's named Criminal Investigation Department?", "Is this concept already covered by an existing Vercy world model that should serve as its single source of truth?", "Which founding instruments and official organizational records establish the relevant department's identity, parent body and jurisdiction?", "Which investigative powers, approval requirements and oversight arrangements actually apply in the intended jurisdiction?", "Which operational measures and public records are available to assess capacity and investigative quality without treating inconsistent case outcome definitions as comparable?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }