{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:56:04Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 15.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09541-7fd8-7da3-9ca3-233591e5fc4e\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Lestovka\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 044: 1001 regist", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 72.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09541-7fcd-7710-99df-8c5f88e4f506\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Lestovka\nRegistry id: vr.tr.lestovka\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:54:52+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:27+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1897783", "registryId": "vr.tr.lestovka", "name": "Lestovka", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1897783/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.lestovka", "name": "Lestovka", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a lestovka, interpret its prayer-counting structure, assess its usability, and select handling appropriate to its construction and religious context.", "definition": "A lestovka is a traditional Russian Orthodox prayer counter, especially associated with Old Believers, consisting of a flexible loop of raised steps, commonly made from folded and sewn leather, with paired triangular flaps at its base.", "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.lestovka as a kind of physical prayer ladder associated with Russian Old Believer practice, including its construction, counting layout, condition, and links to documented traditions of use.", "in_scope": [ "Looped prayer band with tactile steps and associated terminal flaps", "Step counts, grouping, separators, and traversal landmarks", "Materials, assembly, ornament, and evidence of repair", "Relationships to community-specific prayer rules and symbolism", "Physical suitability for counting, handling, and preservation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Prayer ropes and rosaries as broader object families", "The text and theology of the Jesus Prayer", "Old Believer denominations and their institutional histories", "Prayer services, bows, and prostrations as activities", "Individual makers, workshops, and museum collections" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Look for a band with successive tactile rungs or steps, rather than identifying it solely from strung beads or knotted cord.", "Examine the loop junction for triangular flaps called lapostki; record missing or altered flaps before rejecting identification.", "Check for differentiated ordinary steps, larger separators, and terminal groups; total count alone is insufficient.", "Compare construction and attribution with documented lestovki: leather is characteristic, but cloth examples also occur. [Russian Oldbeliever Church](https://en.rpsc.ru/publications/theology-and-culture/lestovka/)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Construction material", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "leather; cloth; mixed; other identified material; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification and determines which handling or repair methods require assessment." }, { "name": "Step inventory", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "count of ordinary steps, enlarged separators, and terminal steps, recorded separately", "why_it_matters": "Prevents different counting conventions from appearing to describe different objects." }, { "name": "Ordered counting layout", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "ordered sequence of step groups, separators, smooth intervals, and junction", "why_it_matters": "Determines which prayer counts can be followed by touch." }, { "name": "Lapostki assembly", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "triangular flap components and paired assemblies counted separately; absent; incomplete; obscured", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes physical components from descriptions that count assembled pairs." }, { "name": "Loop circumference", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "mm, measured without stretching", "why_it_matters": "Documents handling size and supports comparison between examples." }, { "name": "Tactile distinguishability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "clear; partly obscured; indistinguishable; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Indicates whether steps and section boundaries remain usable for counting." }, { "name": "Structural integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "intact; loose stitching; split band; damaged steps; detached flaps; multiple defects; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Guides whether manipulation or repair assessment is appropriate." }, { "name": "Attributed prayer tradition", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "named community or documented rule, with evidence and attribution confidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps instructions for use attached to their actual religious context." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a probable lestovka from its step band, junction, and documented context.", "Map its tactile counting sequence without opening stitched components.", "Match its layout to a documented prayer rule selected by the user.", "Assess whether wear prevents reliable counting or safe handling.", "Document missing parts and refer repair decisions to an appropriate maker or conservator.", "Explain attributed symbolism while distinguishing it from observed construction." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify a lestovka and describe its use in Old Believer prayer with respect for that tradition.", "Record a specimen's material, construction and provenance for a museum or owner." ], "must_not": [ "Treat a lestovka as a decorative curiosity in a way that mocks its religious meaning.", "Present a modern or reproduction piece as an old one, or invent its history.", "Assist in removing lestovki from churches or communities without consent.", "Recommend cleaning or repairing an old leather lestovka in ways that damage it." ], "requires_human": [ "Displaying, selling or lending a lestovka that belongs to a religious community.", "Conservation treatment of an old specimen." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "A lestovka is a sacred object for the communities that use it in prayer.", "Old Believers were persecuted, and their objects carry that history." ], "affected_parties": [ "Old Believer communities", "Owners and museums", "Researchers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The person or community who uses it; museums answer for those in their collections.", "master_systems": [ "Museum collection catalogues" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "A flexible loop of stepped, padded leather segments, like a ladder bent into a ring.", "Paired triangular flaps at the joined ends, often decorated or embroidered.", "Hand-sewn leather or fabric, sometimes beaded." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Leather cracking, stitching failure or mould from poor storage.", "Loss of meaning when separated from its community without record." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "A lestovka is used to count repeated prayers in Russian Orthodox devotional practice, especially among Old Believers.", "It is encountered in personal prayer, religious communities and museum collections documenting devotional traditions." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No generally applicable technical standard or official classification specific to this religious prayer counter is identified." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q1897783: Lestovka", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1897783", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Lestovka", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lestovka", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-variants", "name": "Identity and variants", "description": "Establish what qualifies an object as a lestovka and how variants remain within the registered kind.", "rationale": "A prayer-counting function alone cannot distinguish a lestovka from neighbouring devotional objects.", "layers": [ { "id": "physical-recognition", "name": "Physical recognition", "description": "Evaluate the combination of band, steps, and terminal assembly.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognition-evidence", "name": "Recognition evidence", "description": "Record visible identifying features and the evidence supporting the name, including incomplete examples.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which combination of stepped band, loop junction, and lapostki supports identification as a lestovka?", "kind": "definition", "id": "recognition-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Could this instead be a knotted prayer rope, bead rosary, or decorative imitation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recognition-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "variant-attribution", "name": "Variant attribution", "description": "Separate documented variants from damage and uncertain identifications.", "findings": [ { "id": "count-variant", "name": "Count variant", "description": "The church account describes a usual 109-step form and a 150-step variant; record attribution rather than impose one total universally. [Russian Oldbeliever Church](https://en.rpsc.ru/publications/theology-and-culture/lestovka/)", "questions": [ { "text": "What source identifies the name and intended use of this count variant?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "count-variant-q01" }, { "text": "Does an unusual count represent intentional construction, missing steps, or a different counting convention?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "count-variant-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "step-topology", "name": "Step topology", "description": "Represent the ordered tactile structure through which the user counts.", "rationale": "The useful structure is an ordered route with landmarks, not merely a total number of steps.", "layers": [ { "id": "step-classes", "name": "Step classes", "description": "Distinguish countable elements by position and tactile form.", "findings": [ { "id": "separate-counts", "name": "Separate counts", "description": "Inventory ordinary steps, enlarged separators, and junction-adjacent groups independently.", "questions": [ { "text": "How many elements of each step class are physically present?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "separate-counts-q01" }, { "text": "Which elements does the source include when stating the total?", "kind": "definition", "id": "separate-counts-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "traversal-landmarks", "name": "Traversal landmarks", "description": "Locate section boundaries and the transition between successive rounds.", "findings": [ { "id": "ordered-route", "name": "Ordered route", "description": "Map consecutive step groups, smooth intervals, and junction landmarks from an explicitly chosen origin.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the ordered sequence of groups and separators from the lapostki junction?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "ordered-route-q01" }, { "text": "How does the applicable counting practice identify the start, direction, and completion of a round?", "kind": "action", "id": "ordered-route-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "band-and-lapostki-construction", "name": "Band and lapostki construction", "description": "Describe how the stepped loop and its flap assembly are made.", "rationale": "Assembly details distinguish variants and determine what can be inspected without damage.", "layers": [ { "id": "rung-and-loop-assembly", "name": "Rung and loop assembly", "description": "Record the formation and attachment of the tactile steps.", "findings": [ { "id": "construction-evidence", "name": "Construction evidence", "description": "Separate visible materials and stitching from claims about concealed step contents.", "questions": [ { "text": "How are the steps formed and secured to the band?", "kind": "definition", "id": "construction-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What maker record or prior examination establishes any enclosed inserts without opening the object?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "construction-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "flaps-and-ornament", "name": "Flaps and ornament", "description": "Record lapostki components, attachments, and decoration.", "findings": [ { "id": "lapostki-components", "name": "Lapostki components", "description": "Distinguish individual flaps from sewn pairs and document any concealed auxiliary elements only when evidenced.", "questions": [ { "text": "How many individual triangular flaps and assembled pairs can be identified?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "lapostki-components-q01" }, { "text": "Which embroidery, beads, inscriptions, or auxiliary counters are documented as original rather than later additions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "lapostki-components-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "prayer-use-and-meaning", "name": "Prayer use and meaning", "description": "Connect physical counting features to attributed devotional practice and interpretation.", "rationale": "The same physical feature can carry a counting role and a religious meaning that require different evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "rule-to-object-mapping", "name": "Rule-to-object mapping", "description": "Link step classes and completed rounds to an explicitly identified prayer rule.", "findings": [ { "id": "devotional-counting", "name": "Devotional counting", "description": "Lestovki support counting prayers and bows; the specific assignments belong to a documented practice. [Russian Oldbeliever Church](https://en.rpsc.ru/publications/theology-and-culture/lestovka/)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which community or instruction assigns prayers and bows to the ordinary, enlarged, and terminal steps?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "devotional-counting-q01" }, { "text": "Can this object's actual layout support the user's selected rule without changing its prescribed counts?", "kind": "action", "id": "devotional-counting-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attributed-symbolism", "name": "Attributed symbolism", "description": "Keep interpretations attached to their sources and applicable traditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "symbolic-associations", "name": "Symbolic associations", "description": "Record explanations of the ladder, loop, step groups, and triangular flaps as attributed religious interpretations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who attributes a particular meaning to each structural feature?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "symbolic-associations-q01" }, { "text": "Is that interpretation documented for this variant and community, or only for another form?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "symbolic-associations-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "counting-condition-and-care", "name": "Counting condition and care", "description": "Assess deterioration in relation to tactile use and preservation of devotional construction.", "rationale": "A lestovka may retain its appearance while worn steps or weakened stitching make continued handling unsuitable.", "layers": [ { "id": "functional-wear", "name": "Functional wear", "description": "Evaluate whether the counting route remains physically legible and intact.", "findings": [ { "id": "tactile-and-structural-state", "name": "Tactile and structural state", "description": "Record flattened steps, indistinct separators, missing elements, and stressed junction stitching.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which steps or section markers can no longer be distinguished reliably by touch?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "tactile-and-structural-state-q01" }, { "text": "Would further flexing or counting strain a split band, loose step, or lapostki attachment?", "kind": "action", "id": "tactile-and-structural-state-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "care-and-repair-decisions", "name": "Care and repair decisions", "description": "Determine permissible interventions using material evidence and the object's custodial context.", "findings": [ { "id": "preserve-layout-and-contents", "name": "Preserve layout and contents", "description": "Evaluate proposed care or repairs for effects on step order, tactile distinctions, ornament, and possible enclosed material.", "questions": [ { "text": "What handling or repair permissions apply to this devotional or collection object?", "kind": "action", "id": "preserve-layout-and-contents-q01" }, { "text": "Could the proposed intervention alter the count, erase construction evidence, or disturb concealed contents?", "kind": "action", "id": "preserve-layout-and-contents-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This description is recalled knowledge, not source-verified research.", "Check the number and grouping of steps against a documented example before treating any count as universal.", "Symbolic interpretations of the steps and triangular flaps should be checked against the relevant religious community's account." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Lestovka this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Counting repetitions of the Jesus Prayer.", "Keeping count during prayer rules involving bows or prostrations.", "Providing a tactile aid to prayer in private devotion and worship." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Lestovka this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Repeated handling can wear the leather and loosen stitching.", "Moisture and unsuitable storage can cause leather deterioration or mould." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Lestovka this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Especially associated with Russian Old Believer communities, although its use is not confined to them." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Lestovka this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Chotki", "difference": "A chotki typically counts prayers with knots in a cord; a lestovka uses raised steps in a ladder-like band." }, { "name": "Rosary", "difference": "A Catholic rosary typically uses beads grouped into decades for a particular devotional sequence; a lestovka has a stepped construction and belongs to a different prayer tradition." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Lestovka this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which documented variants qualify as lestovki when triangular flaps are absent or the band construction differs substantially?", "How should sources describing 38 versus 40 steps in a section be reconciled through explicit inclusion or exclusion of separators?", "Which descriptions count lapostki as individual flaps and which count sewn pairs?", "How widespread are enclosed prayer-text inserts and auxiliary round counters across periods, makers, and communities?", "Which community-specific handling and repair practices apply to actively used, inherited, and museum-held examples?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }