{
  "vercy": "1.0-draft",
  "publication": {
    "status": "research-draft",
    "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed",
    "publishableCanonical": false,
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:40:49Z",
    "providers": [
      "Codex"
    ],
    "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read",
    "missingProviders": [],
    "pass": 2,
    "cost": {
      "grok": {
        "seconds": 19.0,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094fc-8e78-7172-8d3b-5526fdb5959c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fescennine Verses\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 10",
        "usd": 0.0,
        "recall": true
      },
      "codex": {
        "seconds": 75.3,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094fc-8e82-7662-bebf-5baffda28804\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fescennine Verses\nRegistry id: vr.tr.fescennine-verses\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entr"
      }
    },
    "enrichment": {
      "pass": 3,
      "engine": "claude",
      "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z",
      "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:47:20+00:00",
      "fields": [
        "agent_conduct",
        "ethics",
        "owners"
      ]
    },
    "gate": {
      "passed": true,
      "version": "1.0",
      "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:28+00:00",
      "evidence": [
        "completeness 1.00",
        "sense: Wikidata description",
        "2 live sources",
        "review by codex: pass"
      ]
    }
  },
  "metaModel": {
    "id": "THING-Q2259405",
    "registryId": "vr.tr.fescennine-verses",
    "name": "Fescennine Verses",
    "version": "0.1.0-research.1",
    "entryKind": "thing",
    "family": "Thing Registry",
    "domain": [
      "INF.MED"
    ],
    "status": "research-draft"
  },
  "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2259405/",
  "model": {
    "registry_id": "vr.tr.fescennine-verses",
    "name": "Fescennine Verses",
    "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify Fescennine verse, assess the evidence for its classification, and distinguish ancient testimony from literary adaptation or modern reconstruction.",
    "definition": "Fescennine verses were an ancient Italian form of ribald, often improvised verse exchange involving personal mockery, associated in Roman tradition with rural festivities and weddings.",
    "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.fescennine-verses as an ancient Italian and Roman verbal performance tradition and creative form, recording its identifying conventions, attributed contexts, evidential limits, and relationships to particular texts and performances.",
    "in_scope": [
      "Criteria for identifying Fescennine verse and distinguishing explicit ancient labels from later scholarly classifications",
      "Evidence for reciprocal taunting, improvisation, and verse delivery",
      "Reported festive and wedding settings and the roles of participants and targets",
      "Relationships among the tradition, surviving testimony, attributed examples, and later adaptations",
      "Uncertainty concerning origins, chronology, social functions, and transmission"
    ],
    "out_of_scope": [
      "Roman satire, satura, and Atellan farce as independent forms",
      "Roman wedding ceremonies and agricultural festivals as complete events",
      "Fescennium as a settlement and Faliscan or Etruscan culture as a whole",
      "Individual poems, translations, editions, manuscripts, and recordings as independently managed works or objects",
      "General histories of Roman theatre and laws governing abusive speech"
    ],
    "distinguishing_features": [
      "Require either an explicit historical Fescennine designation or an argued combination of contextual and formal evidence; obscenity alone is insufficient.",
      "Look for reciprocal verse taunting: Horace associates Fescennine license with alternating rustic mockery. This is evidence from his account, not a mandatory feature of every later use. [Horace, Epistles 2.1.139-155](https://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/satiregenre.html)",
      "Distinguish reported improvised exchanges from formally arranged stage medleys: Livy contrasts Fescennine-like improvisation with subsequent satura performances. [Livy, Book 7 excerpt](https://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/satiregenre.html)",
      "Treat a wedding setting as supporting context rather than a sufficient classification: historical reference literature associates the form with weddings, but not every wedding song is Fescennine. [Smith, Fescennina](https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA%2A/Fescennina.html)",
      "Separate descriptions of the tradition from actual verse examples; a passage discussing Fescennine customs is not itself an instance of Fescennine verse."
    ],
    "characteristics": [
      {
        "name": "Classification basis",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Explicit ancient designation | ancient comparison | scholarly attribution | modern self-description | unresolved",
        "why_it_matters": "Prevents resemblance to abusive or festive poetry from becoming an unsupported identification."
      },
      {
        "name": "Evidence relationship",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Described by | quoted by | exemplified by | imitated by | reconstructed from, linked to a specific passage or artifact",
        "why_it_matters": "Separates testimony about the form from purported examples and later recreations."
      },
      {
        "name": "Exchange structure",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Alternating individuals | alternating groups | one-sided address | unspecified",
        "why_it_matters": "Records whether reciprocal taunting is evidenced rather than assumed."
      },
      {
        "name": "Composition and delivery",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "Reported improvisation | prepared composition | literary simulation | unknown; delivery recorded separately as spoken, sung, or unspecified",
        "why_it_matters": "Keeps composition method distinct from the way verses were delivered."
      },
      {
        "name": "Occasion attribution",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Linked occasion described as harvest festivity, wedding, another named setting, or unknown, with supporting testimony",
        "why_it_matters": "Allows contextual distinctions without making one setting universal."
      },
      {
        "name": "Target and reciprocal standing",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Speaker or group → named or unnamed target; opportunity to reply: attested | inferred | unknown",
        "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation of mutual joking, ceremonial address, and potentially hostile attack."
      },
      {
        "name": "Verbal and metrical evidence",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "Text available for analysis | form described without quotation | disputed attribution | no recoverable wording",
        "why_it_matters": "Prevents assigning a meter or reconstructing language from a generic description."
      },
      {
        "name": "Temporal evidence",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "Date or interval of witness linked separately to the date or interval of the practice it describes; unknown permitted",
        "why_it_matters": "A retrospective account does not establish contemporary documentation of the period it narrates."
      },
      {
        "name": "Interpretive confidence",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "Supported | provisional | disputed | undetermined, assigned to individual claims",
        "why_it_matters": "An accepted identification need not imply settled origins, performance details, or social function."
      }
    ],
    "affordances": [
      "Classify a candidate passage or performance with an explicit evidence trail and confidence assessment.",
      "Compare accounts of Fescennine practice while preserving disagreements about context, form, and chronology.",
      "Link quoted verses and literary adaptations to the tradition without treating them as interchangeable witnesses.",
      "Identify missing evidence before asserting a meter, geographical origin, ritual function, or developmental relationship.",
      "Produce an annotated teaching example or reconstruction that identifies supplied wording and conjectural performance choices."
    ],
    "agent_conduct": {
      "may": [
        "Describe Fescennine verses and their role in Roman festivals and weddings from ancient sources.",
        "Note where ancient testimony is thin or disputed."
      ],
      "must_not": [
        "Use the form to produce mocking verse that targets real, identifiable people.",
        "Present reconstructions as surviving verses.",
        "Produce explicit sexual content under the label of ancient ribaldry."
      ],
      "requires_human": [
        "Publishing satirical verse about a named person."
      ]
    },
    "ethics": {
      "considerations": [
        "Ritual mockery was licensed within its setting; outside it, it can become harassment.",
        "Ancient practices should be described as they were, not invented."
      ],
      "affected_parties": [
        "People targeted by mockery",
        "Readers and students"
      ]
    },
    "owners": {
      "steward": "Nobody owns the form; classicists and libraries keep the ancient sources.",
      "master_systems": []
    },
    "what_it_is_for": [
      "Fescennine verses are encountered in the study of ancient Roman weddings, where mocking or ribald verse exchanges formed part of festive celebration.",
      "They are used in literary and cultural history to examine ritual humor, social license and the relationship between oral performance and surviving written testimony."
    ],
    "failure_modes_and_hazards": [
      "Personal mockery and sexual content can humiliate participants or offend audiences when reproduced without contextual judgment.",
      "Presenting literary adaptations or modern reconstructions as documented ancient wedding performances can mislead audiences about the evidence."
    ],
    "facets_not_applicable": {
      "interfaces": "No specific technical standard, law or official classification governs this historical wedding verse form as such.",
      "recognition": "This historical verse form has no intrinsic visual appearance, and its identification depends on textual and performance context."
    }
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "wikidata",
      "title": "Wikidata item Q2259405: Fescennine Verses",
      "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2259405",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api"
    },
    {
      "id": "wikipedia-en",
      "title": "Wikipedia: Fescennine Verses",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fescennine_Verses",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "general description of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink"
    }
  ],
  "structure": {
    "bundles": [
      {
        "id": "fescennine-identification",
        "name": "Fescennine Identification",
        "description": "Establish why a candidate belongs to this tradition and what kind of relationship it has to it.",
        "rationale": "The label can designate a reported practice, an attributed text, or an imitation; these support different conclusions.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "historical-designation",
            "name": "Historical Designation",
            "description": "Record who applies the Fescennine label and to what.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "designation-evidence",
                "name": "Designation Evidence",
                "description": "A classification should retain the original terminology, its referent, and the passage supporting it.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Does the witness explicitly call the practice or verses Fescennine, compare them to Fescennine verse, or receive that classification from a later interpreter?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "designation-evidence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which passage and edition support the designation, and does the label refer to wording, performance, or social license?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "designation-evidence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "neighbouring-form-boundaries",
            "name": "Neighbouring Form Boundaries",
            "description": "Evaluate overlap with wedding song, invective, satura, and dramatic forms.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "classification-without-conflation",
                "name": "Classification Without Conflation",
                "description": "Shared mockery or festive use should support comparison without automatically establishing identity or descent.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What supports Fescennine classification beyond the candidate being obscene, satirical, or performed at a wedding?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "classification-without-conflation-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Is its relationship to satura, Atellan farce, or literary satire an explicit ancient claim, a modern hypothesis, or merely a resemblance?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "classification-without-conflation-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "verse-exchange-and-delivery",
        "name": "Verse Exchange and Delivery",
        "description": "Describe how taunts are composed, exchanged, and voiced to the extent evidence permits.",
        "rationale": "Reciprocity and reported improvisation help distinguish the tradition, but undocumented performance details must remain unknown.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "responsive-taunting",
            "name": "Responsive Taunting",
            "description": "Capture the organization of speakers, turns, and replies.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "exchange-pattern",
                "name": "Exchange Pattern",
                "description": "Record whether alternating contributions are directly evidenced, described by a witness, or supplied by reconstruction.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Who exchanges verses, and does the evidence distinguish individual speakers from groups?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "exchange-pattern-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Where wording survives, what observable turns, responses, or repeated addresses establish reciprocity?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "exchange-pattern-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "composition-and-voicing",
            "name": "Composition and Voicing",
            "description": "Separate improvisation, textual form, and delivery.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "recoverable-performance-features",
                "name": "Recoverable Performance Features",
                "description": "An agent should assign meter, melody, gesture, or accompaniment only when evidence supports that feature for the candidate.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Is improvisation stated by a source, inferred from the exchange, or simulated by a prepared literary text?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "recoverable-performance-features-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which language, metrical, vocal, or musical features can be established, and which cannot be recovered?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "recoverable-performance-features-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "occasion-and-taunting-license",
        "name": "Occasion and Taunting License",
        "description": "Locate the exchange within its reported occasion and social relationships.",
        "rationale": "The meaning of mockery depends on participants, targets, and setting rather than vocabulary alone.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "festive-setting",
            "name": "Festive Setting",
            "description": "Distinguish the settings claimed for particular practices or examples.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "occasion-specific-context",
                "name": "Occasion-Specific Context",
                "description": "Record harvest and wedding associations separately rather than presenting a single universal performance script.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What occasion does the witness identify, and is it describing a particular event or offering a general origin story?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "occasion-specific-context-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which participants, audience, location, and stage of the occasion are actually specified?",
                    "kind": "definition",
                    "id": "occasion-specific-context-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "license-and-hostility",
            "name": "License and Hostility",
            "description": "Examine how witnesses characterize the limits and purposes of taunting.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "attributed-social-limits",
                "name": "Attributed Social Limits",
                "description": "Horace narrates a shift from festive mockery to harmful abuse and restriction; record this as his account rather than a verified universal sequence. [Horace, Epistles 2.1.139-155](https://www.csun.edu/~hcfll004/satiregenre.html)",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What supports interpreting the exchange as mutual amusement, ceremonial license, humiliation, or hostile attack?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "attributed-social-limits-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "If a restriction or sanction is claimed, which witness states it and how securely is it connected to Fescennine practice?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "attributed-social-limits-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "testimony-transmission-and-reconstruction",
        "name": "Testimony, Transmission, and Reconstruction",
        "description": "Assess what survives and constrain what an agent may infer or recreate.",
        "rationale": "A tradition known through accounts and attributed examples needs explicit separation between historical evidence and supplied content.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "witness-and-example-status",
            "name": "Witness and Example Status",
            "description": "Distinguish descriptions, quotations, literary adaptations, and their transmission.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "evidence-distance",
                "name": "Evidence Distance",
                "description": "Record the witness's date, the period described, and whether transmitted wording purports to reproduce a performance.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Does the passage preserve purported Fescennine wording, describe a custom, or adapt its conventions within another work?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "evidence-distance-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "How far apart are the witness and the practice it describes, and which edition or translation mediates access to the evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "evidence-distance-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "responsible-reconstruction",
            "name": "Responsible Reconstruction",
            "description": "Define how incomplete testimony may inform an explicitly modern example.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "reconstruction-disclosure",
                "name": "Reconstruction Disclosure",
                "description": "A reconstruction should identify its source-supported conventions and its newly supplied wording, meter, staging, and delivery.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Which proposed features derive from identified testimony, and which are modern creative decisions?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "reconstruction-disclosure-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What labels and annotations will prevent the generated example from being mistaken for a surviving ancient text or documented performance?",
                    "kind": "action",
                    "id": "reconstruction-disclosure-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment",
        "name": "Evidence and external alignment",
        "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.",
        "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "reported-evidence",
            "name": "Reported evidence",
            "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "evidence-confidence-notes",
                "name": "Check these first",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "The name's derivation, including proposed connections with Fescennium and fascinum, is disputed.",
                  "Ancient descriptions and later literary adaptations provide limited evidence for early performance practice; a fixed metre or uniform format should not be assumed.",
                  "This describes a traditional creative and performance form, not a single work, edition or surviving manuscript."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Fescennine Verses this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-real-world-use",
                "name": "Real-world use",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Exchanging ritual insults and humorous abuse at communal festivities.",
                  "Providing bawdy entertainment at Roman weddings.",
                  "Serving as a traditional antecedent of Roman dramatic performance in ancient literary accounts."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Fescennine Verses this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards",
                "name": "Failure modes and hazards",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Treating ancient accounts of the form's origins as independently verified history.",
                  "Confusing literary imitations or references with surviving transcripts of improvised performance.",
                  "Assuming that all Roman ritual invective belonged to this specific form."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Fescennine Verses this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-regional-variation",
                "name": "Regional variation",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "The tradition is associated with ancient Italy and its reception in Roman culture; its precise geographical origin is disputed."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Fescennine Verses this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-neighbours",
                "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "name": "Roman satire",
                    "difference": "Roman literary satire is a distinct authored genre; Fescennine verses are associated principally with festive and ritual verse abuse."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Epithalamium",
                    "difference": "An epithalamium is a wedding song or poem; Fescennine wedding verses are distinguished by their ribald mockery, and the Fescennine tradition also extends beyond weddings."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "Atellan farce",
                    "difference": "Atellan farce is a theatrical form with stock characters, whereas Fescennine verses are characterized by exchanges of verse mockery."
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Fescennine Verses this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "openQuestions": [
    "Which surviving passages qualify as examples of Fescennine verse rather than descriptions, allusions, or literary adaptations?",
    "How should the competing derivations from Fescennium and fascinum be evaluated, and can either establish geographical origin or ritual purpose?",
    "How consistently do reciprocity, improvisation, and particular metrical practices characterize the evidence across periods and settings?",
    "What historical relationship, if any, can be established among Fescennine exchanges, wedding invective, satura, and later Roman drama beyond ancient developmental narratives?",
    "Which claims about protective or fertility functions and legal suppression survive scrutiny of their primary witnesses and modern scholarship?"
  ],
  "statistics": {
    "bundles": 5,
    "layers": 9,
    "findings": 13,
    "questions": 21
  }
}
