{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:47:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094cb-ed37-7320-b538-1bc8bb2e142a\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Collegiate assessor\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: ", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 70.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094cb-ed41-7361-bb8a-f8e645c6588e\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Collegiate assessor\nRegistry id: vr.tr.collegiate-assessor\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:45:55+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:29+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q2365856", "registryId": "vr.tr.collegiate-assessor", "name": "Collegiate assessor", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2365856/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.collegiate-assessor", "name": "Collegiate assessor", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise Collegiate assessor as a historical civil rank, assess evidence of its attribution, and interpret its implications within the applicable period.", "definition": "Collegiate assessor was a civil-service rank in class VIII of the Russian Empire's Table of Ranks, indicating an official's hierarchical standing rather than a specific job.", "scope_statement": "Provisionally model vr.tr.collegiate-assessor as the Russian imperial civil rank of class VIII, consistent with the consulted [reference article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collegiate_Assessor); the supplied INF / INF.MED classification and creative-work context remain unresolved registry discrepancies.", "in_scope": [ "The rank's names, translations and identification within the Table of Ranks", "Period-specific conditions for acquiring and holding the rank", "Evidence linking a holder to an award of the rank", "Period-specific precedence, status consequences and rank equivalences", "Distinguishing historical rank attribution from literary representation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete biographies of individual rank holders", "Duties and powers of particular government offices", "The complete Russian imperial civil-service hierarchy", "Independent models of nobility and inheritance", "Literary works, editions and fictional characters mentioning the rank", "Modern educational, tax or professional assessors" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require identification with the Russian civil-service title коллежский асессор, rather than an assessor working at a college.", "Check for class VIII in the civil branch of the Table of Ranks; a similar translated title alone is insufficient.", "Separate possession of the rank from appointment to a particular office or membership of a collegium.", "Treat military equivalence as a dated relationship rather than evidence that the holder served as a military officer.", "Distinguish a documented historical holder from a fictional character described using the same title." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Attested rank designation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Original-script title, transliteration and translated label, each with source and language", "why_it_matters": "Prevents unrelated assessor titles from being merged through translation." }, { "name": "Table of Ranks placement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Civil branch; class VIII; dated reference to the governing rank table", "why_it_matters": "Anchors identity and comparisons within the historical hierarchy." }, { "name": "Applicable rule period", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Governing instrument, jurisdiction, effective interval and calendar convention", "why_it_matters": "Acquisition rules and consequences must be evaluated for the relevant date." }, { "name": "Award evidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented award, contemporary attestation, retrospective attribution, disputed, unknown", "why_it_matters": "Separates evidence of formal conferral from weaker references to a title." }, { "name": "Qualifying service duration", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Years and months, with credited service interval and applicable rule", "why_it_matters": "Supports investigation of eligibility without assuming one service threshold applied throughout the rank's history." }, { "name": "Acquisition route", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented route under a dated rule; ordinary promotion, exceptional award, other, unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents exceptional cases from becoming general promotion rules." }, { "name": "Nobility consequence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Hereditary, personal, no consequence established, disputed; qualified by award date and governing instrument", "why_it_matters": "Keeps status consequences separate from the title and from a holder's pre-existing status." }, { "name": "Attribution context", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Historical administrative record, historical narrative, fictional representation, ambiguous", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether an attribution supports a historical holder relationship or a representation relationship." } ], "affordances": [ "Normalise a documented title to this rank while preserving its original wording.", "Assess whether a dated record supports an individual's possession of the rank.", "Compare acquisition evidence with the rules applicable at the time.", "Explain dated precedence and status consequences with explicit evidence limits.", "Link literary mentions to the rank without creating historical service records.", "Flag the registry's media classification for review against its original source identifier." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the rank and its place in the Table of Ranks from historical sources.", "Identify historical holders from documents with citations." ], "must_not": [ "Confuse the rank with a job or with modern ranks.", "Misattribute ranks to people without evidence.", "Present the hereditary privileges attached to ranks without historical context." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing genealogical claims about families." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Ranks shaped social status and privilege in the Russian Empire.", "Genealogical claims affect families' sense of identity." ], "affected_parties": [ "Descendants", "Historians" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the rank; archives hold service records.", "master_systems": [ "Historical state archives" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Appears in service records, titles and uniforms of the period with class insignia." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misinterpretation of historical documents.", "False genealogical claims." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "The rank appears in Russian imperial service records, appointment documents, biographies and literature.", "It identifies an official's place in the civil hierarchy rather than a particular office or set of duties.", "Historical interpretation uses the date of the record because the privileges associated with rank changed over time." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Table of Ranks, promulgated by Emperor Peter I in 1722, classified Collegiate assessor as a class VIII civil rank in the Russian Empire." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q2365856: Collegiate assessor", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2365856", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Collegiate Assessor", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collegiate_Assessor", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "rank-identity", "name": "Rank identity", "description": "Identify the historical title and resolve its boundary against offices, occupations and works.", "rationale": "The English label and supplied media classification create a material risk of modelling the wrong entity.", "layers": [ { "id": "title-identification", "name": "Title identification", "description": "Connect source wording to the specific civil rank.", "findings": [ { "id": "attested-title-mapping", "name": "Attested title mapping", "description": "Record evidence that an original or translated designation denotes this rank.", "questions": [ { "text": "What original-script designation and source passage identify the title as collegiate assessor?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attested-title-mapping-q01" }, { "text": "Does the translated label denote this rank, an assessor's office, or an unrelated occupation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attested-title-mapping-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "registry-referent", "name": "Registry referent", "description": "Establish what entity the registry entry was intended to name.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-discrepancy", "name": "Classification discrepancy", "description": "Preserve the supplied classification while recording the evidence needed to resolve its conflict with the rank interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original Wikidata identifier or import record supplied this registry label?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "classification-discrepancy-q01" }, { "text": "Does that identifier refer to the historical rank or to a separately identifiable work titled Collegiate assessor?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-discrepancy-q02" }, { "text": "Should the registry classification be corrected, or should this draft be redirected to a verified work?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-discrepancy-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-rank-system", "name": "Historical rank system", "description": "Place collegiate assessor within a dated hierarchy and institutional setting.", "rationale": "Class placement and cross-service comparisons are meaningful only within the applicable historical system.", "layers": [ { "id": "civil-hierarchy", "name": "Civil hierarchy", "description": "Record the rank's class and relationships to neighbouring civil ranks.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-class-placement", "name": "Dated class placement", "description": "Anchor hierarchy relationships in a specified version of the Table of Ranks.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dated table or regulation establishes collegiate assessor's civil class?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-class-placement-q01" }, { "text": "Which civil ranks immediately precede and follow it in that version of the hierarchy?", "kind": "definition", "id": "dated-class-placement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "equivalence-and-office", "name": "Equivalence and office", "description": "Separate comparable rank standing from actual employment and command.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-rank-equivalence", "name": "Bounded rank equivalence", "description": "Represent cross-service equivalence and office relationships without treating them as identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which military or court rank is equivalent for the date and service branch under examination?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bounded-rank-equivalence-q01" }, { "text": "What separate appointment evidence establishes the holder's office and duties?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "bounded-rank-equivalence-q02" }, { "text": "May the source's military-style designation be normalised as a civil-rank reference, or must it remain ambiguous?", "kind": "action", "id": "bounded-rank-equivalence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "acquisition-and-holder-evidence", "name": "Acquisition and holder evidence", "description": "Evaluate promotion conditions and evidence that a person actually held the rank.", "rationale": "Eligibility, formal conferral and later use of a title are distinct claims requiring different evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "promotion-conditions", "name": "Promotion conditions", "description": "Record dated qualifications, credited service and exceptional routes.", "findings": [ { "id": "applicable-acquisition-rule", "name": "Applicable acquisition rule", "description": "Evaluate a proposed acquisition against the rule governing its date and circumstances.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which rule specifies service, education, examination or appointment requirements for this acquisition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "applicable-acquisition-rule-q01" }, { "text": "How much qualifying service is documented under that rule?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "applicable-acquisition-rule-q02" }, { "text": "Does a documented exception apply to this person or jurisdiction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "applicable-acquisition-rule-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conferral-and-tenure", "name": "Conferral and tenure", "description": "Establish the award and distinguish rank possession from active employment.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-rank-possession", "name": "Documented rank possession", "description": "Record the strongest available attestation, its effective date and subsequent changes.", "questions": [ { "text": "What award instrument or service record establishes possession of collegiate assessor rank?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-rank-possession-q01" }, { "text": "Does a later record indicate promotion, loss of rank, retirement with retained title, or merely cessation of an office?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-rank-possession-q02" }, { "text": "Should conflicting dates be reconciled through calendar conversion or retained as an unresolved evidence conflict?", "kind": "action", "id": "documented-rank-possession-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "status-and-representation", "name": "Status and representation", "description": "Interpret consequences of holding the rank and distinguish them from social or literary presentation.", "rationale": "A title can communicate formal standing, claimed prestige or fictional characterisation, and these cannot be inferred interchangeably.", "layers": [ { "id": "rank-consequences", "name": "Rank consequences", "description": "Connect documented awards to period-specific status and precedence rules.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-status-effects", "name": "Dated status effects", "description": "Record only consequences supported for the award's date and circumstances.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which governing instrument establishes the nobility consequence of an award at this date?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-status-effects-q01" }, { "text": "Which consequences arise from this rank rather than pre-existing estate membership or a separate office?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dated-status-effects-q02" }, { "text": "What additional evidence is needed before attributing any consequence to the holder's descendants?", "kind": "action", "id": "dated-status-effects-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "documentary-and-literary-use", "name": "Documentary and literary use", "description": "Interpret titles, forms of address and fictional mentions according to their evidential context.", "findings": [ { "id": "contextual-title-interpretation", "name": "Contextual title interpretation", "description": "Preserve whether a title is an administrative attestation, social styling or fictional description.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the rank asserted by an administrative record, a narrator, a character or the person claiming it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contextual-title-interpretation-q01" }, { "text": "Does the usage support actual rank possession, a claim to standing, or representation of the rank in a work?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "contextual-title-interpretation-q02" }, { "text": "Should the agent create a historical holder link, a fictional representation link, or leave the attribution unresolved?", "kind": "action", "id": "contextual-title-interpretation-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The supplied INF.MED domain suggests a media-related entity and does not fit the historical rank; the intended registry referent needs verification.", "The name is also associated with a musical group; this answer describes the historical rank and should not be transferred to that group.", "Legal privileges attached to the rank changed over time and require date-specific verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Russian Imperial Table of Ranks", "value_or_pattern": "Class VIII", "note": "Identifies the historical civil rank, not an individual officeholder." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Table of Ranks, instituted by Peter I in 1722, established the Russian Empire's hierarchy of civil, military and court ranks." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Classifying civil officials within the Russian imperial administration.", "Recording an official's status in service records and formal forms of address.", "Interpreting social standing in Russian historical documents and literature." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Mistaking the rank for a particular administrative position.", "Assuming that its associated nobility privileges remained unchanged throughout its history." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The title belongs to the Russian imperial system; similarly translated titles in other administrations need not represent equivalent ranks." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Titular councillor", "difference": "A civil rank in class IX, immediately below collegiate assessor." }, { "name": "Court councillor", "difference": "A civil rank in class VII, immediately above collegiate assessor." }, { "name": "Collegiate secretary", "difference": "A separate, lower civil rank in class X." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Collegiate assessor this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the original registry source identify the civil rank, or an otherwise unverified work with the same title, and why was INF / INF.MED assigned?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this rank concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Which primary instruments establish the exact effective periods, calendar conventions and jurisdictional exceptions for acquisition and abolition?", "How did nobility consequences, retained status and descendants' treatment vary across rule changes and individual circumstances?", "Which authoritative records settle changing military equivalences, forms of address and the distinction between rank possession and office appointment?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 29 } }