{
  "vercy": "1.0-draft",
  "publication": {
    "status": "research-draft",
    "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed",
    "publishableCanonical": false,
    "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:09:41Z",
    "providers": [
      "Codex"
    ],
    "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read",
    "missingProviders": [],
    "pass": 2,
    "cost": {
      "grok": {
        "seconds": 14.7,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0954e-0797-7193-a3c2-ac424df21034\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: margaritasite\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.MAT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 044: 1001 r",
        "usd": 0.0,
        "recall": true
      },
      "codex": {
        "seconds": 67.5,
        "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0954e-079c-7270-88ea-6f49af4e0981\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: margaritasite\nRegistry id: vr.tr.margaritasite\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.MAT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none"
      }
    },
    "enrichment": {
      "pass": 3,
      "engine": "claude",
      "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z",
      "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:55:11+00:00",
      "fields": [
        "agent_conduct",
        "ethics",
        "failure_modes_and_hazards",
        "owners",
        "standards_and_regulation",
        "visual_identification"
      ]
    },
    "gate": {
      "passed": true,
      "version": "1.0",
      "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:29+00:00",
      "evidence": [
        "completeness 1.00",
        "sense: Wikidata description",
        "2 live sources",
        "review by codex: pass"
      ]
    }
  },
  "metaModel": {
    "id": "THING-Q2398230",
    "registryId": "vr.tr.margaritasite",
    "name": "margaritasite",
    "version": "0.1.0-research.1",
    "entryKind": "thing",
    "family": "Thing Registry",
    "domain": [
      "PHY.MAT"
    ],
    "status": "research-draft"
  },
  "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2398230/",
  "model": {
    "registry_id": "vr.tr.margaritasite",
    "name": "margaritasite",
    "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify margaritasite, assess the composition and condition of a specimen, and determine which characterization or handling actions its evidence supports.",
    "definition": "Margaritasite is a rare caesium-bearing hydrated uranyl vanadate mineral related to carnotite.",
    "scope_statement": "This model owns the mineral identity registered as vr.tr.margaritasite in PHY / PHY.MAT, including its cesium-bearing uranyl-vanadate composition, distinction from carnotite, specimen-level identification evidence, hydration state, and handling-relevant measurements.",
    "in_scope": [
      "Mineral-species identification and its evidential confidence",
      "Cesium, potassium, hydronium, uranium, vanadium, and water contributions to the mineral formula",
      "Crystal-phase identification and discrimination from carnotite or mixed phases",
      "Margaritasite abundance, distribution, and condition within a specimen",
      "Locality and analytical provenance",
      "Specimen-specific radiological and contamination measurements"
    ],
    "out_of_scope": [
      "The complete mineralogy and economic assessment of a uranium deposit",
      "Uranium extraction, refining, or fuel manufacture",
      "Carnotite as an independently modeled mineral species",
      "Synthetic cesium uranyl vanadates treated automatically as natural margaritasite",
      "General radiation-protection procedures and jurisdiction-wide transport rules"
    ],
    "distinguishing_features": [
      "Test whether cesium predominates over potassium and hydronium in the relevant composition, rather than identifying every cesium-bearing carnotite-like material as margaritasite; this distinction follows the original description summarized by [USGS](https://www.usgs.gov/publications/margaritasite-a-new-mineral-hydrothermal-origin-pena-blanca-uranium-district-mexico).",
      "Require evidence for a uranyl-vanadate phase consistent with (Cs,K,H3O)2(UO2)2V2O8·nH2O, with n approximately 1 in the original description, rather than merely detecting uranium and cesium in bulk rock.",
      "Check diffraction compatibility with the reported monoclinic P21/a structure, while distinguishing measurements of natural material from reference data for synthetic analogues.",
      "Use spatially resolved composition with phase analysis to distinguish a single mineral phase from carnotite-bearing intergrowths or mixtures; [a 2024 study](https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/14/4/431) reports both mixed Cs-K compositions and nearly pure cesium uranyl vanadate."
    ],
    "characteristics": [
      {
        "name": "Identification status",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "unexamined | provisional | analytically supported | disputed",
        "why_it_matters": "A locality label or visual resemblance alone does not establish margaritasite."
      },
      {
        "name": "Cesium and potassium proportions",
        "kind": "measurement",
        "unit_or_values": "atoms per formula unit, normalization basis, and analytical uncertainty",
        "why_it_matters": "These proportions constrain the distinction from carnotite and reveal compositional variation."
      },
      {
        "name": "Hydronium assignment",
        "kind": "category",
        "unit_or_values": "directly supported | inferred from charge balance | untested",
        "why_it_matters": "An inferred component must not be presented as a directly measured constituent."
      },
      {
        "name": "Water content",
        "kind": "measurement",
        "unit_or_values": "n in ·nH2O and mass %, with temperature, humidity, and method",
        "why_it_matters": "Hydration affects formula interpretation and comparison between specimens and reference phases."
      },
      {
        "name": "Crystal-phase match",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "observed diffraction pattern linked to a cited natural-mineral or synthetic reference",
        "why_it_matters": "Chemical composition alone cannot resolve phase identity or intergrowths."
      },
      {
        "name": "Margaritasite phase fraction",
        "kind": "measurement",
        "unit_or_values": "mass % or volume %, with method and detection limit",
        "why_it_matters": "Whole-specimen composition and activity cannot automatically be assigned to margaritasite."
      },
      {
        "name": "Specimen integrity",
        "kind": "state",
        "unit_or_values": "coherent | friable | loose powder | visibly altered | unassessed",
        "why_it_matters": "Condition affects sampling quality and the potential release of mineral-bearing particles."
      },
      {
        "name": "Radiological characterization",
        "kind": "measurement",
        "unit_or_values": "Bq/g by identified radionuclide; dose rate in µSv/h with distance, geometry, instrument, and date",
        "why_it_matters": "The mineral name and ideal formula do not establish the actual specimen's activity or external dose rate."
      },
      {
        "name": "Collection provenance",
        "kind": "relation",
        "unit_or_values": "specimen linked to locality, collection event, accession, and analytical subsamples",
        "why_it_matters": "It keeps geological attribution and laboratory findings attached to the material actually examined."
      }
    ],
    "affordances": [
      "Assess whether a specimen's chemistry and diffraction support identification as margaritasite.",
      "Select phase-specific analyses to resolve a margaritasite-carnotite ambiguity.",
      "Compare compositions while retaining hydration assumptions and analytical uncertainty.",
      "Map margaritasite-bearing domains before selecting a representative subsample.",
      "Flag missing radiological or contamination evidence before approving a proposed specimen operation."
    ],
    "agent_conduct": {
      "may": [
        "Describe margaritasite and its relation to carnotite from mineralogical sources.",
        "Measure and record a specimen's dose rate for its holder."
      ],
      "must_not": [
        "Advise storing it in living spaces or within reach of children.",
        "Advise crushing it or handling it without gloves and hand washing.",
        "Help ship or sell it without disclosing its radioactivity."
      ],
      "requires_human": [
        "Disposal or cross-border transfer of the specimen."
      ]
    },
    "ethics": {
      "considerations": [
        "It exposes holders to radiation and toxic vanadium.",
        "Rare uranium minerals are easily mislabelled, hiding their hazards."
      ],
      "affected_parties": [
        "Collectors and households",
        "Children",
        "Transport workers"
      ]
    },
    "owners": {
      "steward": "The person or collection that holds a specimen; radiation protection authorities regulate it.",
      "master_systems": []
    },
    "visual_identification": [
      "Yellow powdery or fine crystalline coatings like carnotite.",
      "Confirmed by analysis, since many yellow uranyl vanadates look alike."
    ],
    "failure_modes_and_hazards": [
      "Emits ionizing radiation and releases radon.",
      "Powder is toxic if inhaled or swallowed."
    ],
    "standards_and_regulation": [
      "IAEA Safety Standards SSR-6, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, International Atomic Energy Agency."
    ],
    "what_it_is_for": [
      "Margaritasite is encountered in mineralogical collections and research on uranium-bearing mineral assemblages.",
      "Specimens are studied to characterize hydrated uranyl vanadates and distinguish related minerals through compositional and structural evidence."
    ]
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "wikidata",
      "title": "Wikidata item Q2398230: margaritasite",
      "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2398230",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api"
    },
    {
      "id": "wikipedia-en",
      "title": "Wikipedia: Margaritasite",
      "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaritasite",
      "url_status": "live",
      "what_it_supports": "general description of the item",
      "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink"
    }
  ],
  "structure": {
    "bundles": [
      {
        "id": "species-and-composition",
        "name": "Species and composition",
        "description": "Establish the chemical evidence for naming a phase margaritasite.",
        "rationale": "Cesium occurrence alone is insufficient to distinguish margaritasite from related minerals or mixtures.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "species-boundary",
            "name": "Species boundary",
            "description": "Separate mineral identification from provisional labels and related compositions.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "cesium-dominance-evidence",
                "name": "Cesium-dominance evidence",
                "description": "Record phase-specific cation proportions and the nomenclature authority used to interpret them.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Does the analyzed mineral domain support cesium dominance, and which accepted naming criterion is being applied?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "cesium-dominance-evidence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Were cesium and potassium measured within the same identified phase or only in a bulk specimen?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "cesium-dominance-evidence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "formula-accounting",
            "name": "Formula accounting",
            "description": "Keep measured constituents separate from normalization and charge-balance assumptions.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "constituents-and-assumptions",
                "name": "Constituents and assumptions",
                "description": "Document uranium, vanadium, interlayer constituents, water, and unresolved analytical deficits.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What measured elemental proportions and normalization basis support the proposed margaritasite formula?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "constituents-and-assumptions-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Is hydronium independently supported or inferred, and could impurities explain the apparent deficit?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "constituents-and-assumptions-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "structure-and-hydration",
        "name": "Structure and hydration",
        "description": "Connect crystal-phase evidence with the material's hydration and preparation history.",
        "rationale": "Natural hydrated material must be compared carefully with related phases and synthetic reference structures.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "diffraction-identification",
            "name": "Diffraction identification",
            "description": "Evaluate structural compatibility and competing phase assignments.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "reference-qualified-phase-match",
                "name": "Reference-qualified phase match",
                "description": "Retain the observed pattern, reference origin, matching criteria, and unexplained reflections.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Which observed reflections and refined parameters support margaritasite over the candidate associated phases?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "reference-qualified-phase-match-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Does the comparison reference describe natural margaritasite or a synthetic cesium uranyl-vanadate analogue?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "reference-qualified-phase-match-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "water-and-conditioning",
            "name": "Water and conditioning",
            "description": "Track water content and changes associated with storage or analysis.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "hydration-evidence",
                "name": "Hydration evidence",
                "description": "Record measured hydration without assuming a fixed value for every specimen.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What water content was measured, under which environmental conditions, and how was adsorbed water distinguished from structural water?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "hydration-evidence-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Did drying, vacuum exposure, or heating change the phase before or during characterization?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "hydration-evidence-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "specimen-and-geological-context",
        "name": "Specimen and geological context",
        "description": "Locate margaritasite within a physical specimen and preserve its collection history.",
        "rationale": "A mineral-bearing rock can contain heterogeneous domains whose analyses cannot be pooled without qualification.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "phase-distribution",
            "name": "Phase distribution",
            "description": "Resolve abundance, associated minerals, and compositional variation at the sampling scale.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "intergrowth-and-sampling",
                "name": "Intergrowth and sampling",
                "description": "Distinguish margaritasite domains from adjacent carnotite-like material and matrix.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Are Cs-rich and K-rich measurements from distinct grains, zoning within grains, or unresolved mixtures?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "intergrowth-and-sampling-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Which mapped domain can be sampled to characterize margaritasite with the least interference from associated phases?",
                    "kind": "action",
                    "id": "intergrowth-and-sampling-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "locality-and-history",
            "name": "Locality and history",
            "description": "Separate verified collection evidence from geological interpretations.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "occurrence-attribution",
                "name": "Occurrence attribution",
                "description": "Link the examined specimen to its documented occurrence without treating locality as proof of identity.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Which collection records connect this specimen and its subsamples to the stated deposit and geological setting?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "occurrence-attribution-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What specimen-specific evidence supports a proposed formation or alteration history?",
                    "kind": "provenance",
                    "id": "occurrence-attribution-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "condition-and-operation-evidence",
        "name": "Condition and operation evidence",
        "description": "Record the physical and radiological evidence needed to evaluate proposed work on a uranium-bearing specimen.",
        "rationale": "Actual specimen condition, composition, and measurements determine the handling assessment.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "radiological-state",
            "name": "Radiological state",
            "description": "Keep measured activity and dose rate distinct from estimates based on ideal composition.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "specimen-specific-radiometry",
                "name": "Specimen-specific radiometry",
                "description": "Attach radiological observations to the actual specimen, measurement geometry, and instrument.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "What radionuclide activity or dose-rate measurements exist for this specimen, with what uncertainty and geometry?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "specimen-specific-radiometry-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "Does any activity estimate assume uranium-series equilibrium or a margaritasite fraction that has not been established?",
                    "kind": "boundary",
                    "id": "specimen-specific-radiometry-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          },
          {
            "id": "particle-release-and-intervention",
            "name": "Particle release and intervention",
            "description": "Relate specimen integrity and contamination observations to the proposed operation.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "operation-readiness",
                "name": "Operation readiness",
                "description": "Make missing evidence explicit before sampling, grinding, heating, or transferring material.",
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "text": "Is the margaritasite-bearing material friable or powdery, and what removable-contamination measurements are available?",
                    "kind": "measurement",
                    "id": "operation-readiness-q01"
                  },
                  {
                    "text": "What qualified handling assessment and applicable authorization cover the proposed operation on this specimen?",
                    "kind": "action",
                    "id": "operation-readiness-q02"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment",
        "name": "Evidence and external alignment",
        "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.",
        "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.",
        "layers": [
          {
            "id": "reported-evidence",
            "name": "Reported evidence",
            "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.",
            "findings": [
              {
                "id": "evidence-confidence-notes",
                "name": "Check these first",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Verify the accepted formula, hydration state and caesium-potassium substitution limits before using a precise chemical specification.",
                  "Check current International Mineralogical Association nomenclature and species status.",
                  "No sources were consulted; numerical physical properties and identifier codes are omitted because they cannot be recalled confidently."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of margaritasite this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-identifiers",
                "name": "Identifiers and schemes",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "scheme": "Mineral species name",
                    "value_or_pattern": "margaritasite",
                    "note": "Names a mineral species rather than a commercial chemical grade."
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of margaritasite this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-real-world-use",
                "name": "Real-world use",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Mineralogical research and reference collections.",
                  "Study of uranium-vanadium mineralization and natural caesium incorporation."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of margaritasite this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards",
                "name": "Failure modes and hazards",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  "Its uranium content makes it naturally radioactive.",
                  "Dust or ingested particles can present internal contamination and chemical toxicity hazards."
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of margaritasite this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              },
              {
                "id": "evidence-neighbours",
                "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart",
                "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.",
                "evidence": [
                  {
                    "name": "carnotite",
                    "difference": "Carnotite is a potassium uranyl vanadate; margaritasite is distinguished by its caesium-bearing composition."
                  },
                  {
                    "name": "tyuyamunite",
                    "difference": "Tyuyamunite is a calcium uranyl vanadate with a different composition and hydration state."
                  }
                ],
                "questions": [
                  {
                    "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01",
                    "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of margaritasite this model covers, and on what evidence?",
                    "kind": "provenance"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "openQuestions": [
    "What current mineralogical authority defines the margaritasite-carnotite boundary, particularly where hydronium is inferred rather than measured?",
    "How variable is natural margaritasite's hydration, and which environmental or analytical conditions change its structure?",
    "Which reference diffraction datasets directly characterize natural margaritasite rather than synthetic analogues?",
    "Which occurrences beyond the original locality have independently supported species identifications?",
    "Do authoritative substance identifiers or hazard classifications apply specifically to margaritasite, and how must these be distinguished from classifications of its constituents or host material?"
  ],
  "statistics": {
    "bundles": 5,
    "layers": 9,
    "findings": 13,
    "questions": 21
  }
}
