{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T11:37:12Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00819128, "turns": 1, "seconds": 131.4, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 94.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07ba4-2cef-71d3-96a3-7b402e5de0ac\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Common Pheasant\nRegistry id: vr.tr.common-pheasant\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:04:04+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:29+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q25432", "registryId": "vr.tr.common-pheasant", "name": "Common Pheasant", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.LIV" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q25432/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.common-pheasant", "name": "Common Pheasant", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a Common Pheasant, assess its condition and ecological circumstances, and determine which observations or interventions are justified.", "definition": "The common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus Linnaeus, 1758) is a large, sexually dimorphic Palearctic galliform (Phasianidae) native from the Caucasus across Central Asia to China, comprising many subspecies separated mainly by male plumage, and the source of the hybrid ring-necked game-farm stocks now widely released or naturalised in Europe, North America, and New Zealand.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the recognition, individual state, life-stage dependencies and action-relevant relationships of Common Pheasant under vr.tr.common-pheasant in PHY / PHY.LIV, provisionally interpreted as Phasianus colchicus; population, habitat and management systems are linked contexts.", "in_scope": [ "Species identification with evidence, confidence and unresolved alternatives", "Sex, life stage, plumage variation and individual recognition", "Locomotion, feeding, body condition and observable impairment", "Breeding activity, nest association and dependent young", "Habitat use, encounter history and wild, captive or released provenance", "Circumstances governing observation, handling, care or management" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Other pheasant species and the wider Phasianidae classification", "Population abundance, demographic trends and conservation assessments", "Farmland, woodland-edge and enclosure design as managed places", "Gamebird enterprises, release programmes and shooting events", "Veterinary disease models, diagnostic protocols and treatments", "Carcasses, meat, feathers and other derived products as separate things" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "For a fully feathered bird, check the long, tapering tail together with a small head, long neck and substantial ground-bird body; retain partridge and grouse alternatives when the tail is obscured or incomplete. [Cornell identification](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/id)", "For an adult male, seek the combined green head, red facial skin and patterned chestnut or golden-brown body; colour alone is insufficient for an atypical bird. [RSPB identification](https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/pheasant)", "For a female, test brown-and-black mottling together with the long pointed tail; brown plumage by itself does not resolve confusion with other female gamebirds. [Cornell identification](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/id)", "For a calling male, compare the recorded crow and associated brief wing-drumming sequence with a verified reference; treat a sound without a located bird as supporting evidence. [Cornell identification](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/id)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Identification assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "supported Common Pheasant identification | provisional | unresolved pheasant | rejected; evidence and taxonomic reference required", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether species-specific interpretations and actions apply." }, { "name": "Sex assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "male | female | undetermined; method and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Changes the interpretation of plumage and breeding behaviour." }, { "name": "Life stage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "embryonic | chick | juvenile | adult | undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Determines which recognition features and dependency expectations are applicable." }, { "name": "Plumage and tail condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "observed colours and patterns; neck-ring appearance; tail completeness; moult evidence; atypical features", "why_it_matters": "Separates identification uncertainty from feather loss or changing plumage." }, { "name": "Body mass", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "g; date, method and life-stage context", "why_it_matters": "Supports condition monitoring when comparable measurements are available." }, { "name": "Locomotor performance", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "walking, running and spontaneous flight observations; impairment present | absent in observation | unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes observed capability from assumptions based on remaining on the ground." }, { "name": "Feeding activity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "food sought, food taken, swallowing observed, observation duration, access constraints", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of feeding opportunity and possible impairment." }, { "name": "Breeding association", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "display territory | mate association | nest | brood; observed role and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Identifies dependencies that an intervention could disrupt." }, { "name": "Origin and management history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "linked hatch, holding, release or recovery records; unknown permitted", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a free-ranging sighting from being treated as proof of wild origin." }, { "name": "Current living context", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "free-ranging | enclosed | temporarily held | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Separates present circumstances from historical origin." }, { "name": "Encounter location", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "place, timestamp, positional uncertainty and observed habitat use", "why_it_matters": "Connects condition and proposed actions to the actual encounter." }, { "name": "Action eligibility", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "per proposed action: supported | prohibited | unresolved; jurisdiction, date and authority reference", "why_it_matters": "Prevents gamebird status or presumed ownership from becoming blanket permission." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify and document a pheasant through photographs, recordings and field observations, retaining unresolved alternatives.", "Reobserve a bird and compare condition or behaviour using individual marks and encounter uncertainty.", "Assess use of feeding, shelter and breeding sites and refer site changes to the responsible habitat model.", "Evaluate whether an apparently isolated chick or impaired adult warrants specialist assessment.", "Support authorised capture, examination, marking or care through an appropriate specialist workflow.", "Evaluate proposed release, relocation or harvest against verified provenance, local authority and the bird's current state." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Report pheasant observations to wildlife recording schemes.", "Describe the species, its native range and introduced populations from conservation sources." ], "must_not": [ "Hunt or help hunt outside the season, area or licence the law allows.", "Keep or rear pheasants in conditions that harm their welfare.", "Release birds where release is restricted to protect native wildlife." ], "requires_human": [ "Releasing reared birds into the wild.", "Culling birds." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Mass release for shooting affects native wildlife and habitats.", "Rearing and shooting raise animal welfare questions." ], "affected_parties": [ "The pheasants", "Native wildlife", "Rural communities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody for wild birds; the keeper for reared birds; game law governs hunting.", "master_systems": [ "Global species assessment and bird population databases" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Males have a long pointed tail, copper body plumage and a red face wattle, often with a white neck ring.", "Females are mottled brown with a shorter tail." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Common pheasants inhabit farmland, grassland edges, scrub and woodland margins within their native and introduced ranges.", "They are encountered in wildlife surveys, game management, captive breeding and assessments of introduced bird populations." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, issued by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, governs the scientific naming of this animal species." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Road crossings and sudden flight can contribute to collisions involving vehicles or nearby equipment.", "Handling wild or captive birds can expose people and other birds to infectious agents.", "Large releases can increase ecological pressure through competition, predation and disease transmission.", "Unnecessary disturbance can cause stress, injury or abandonment of nesting attempts." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "madge-mcgowan-2002", "title": "Pheasants, Partridges and Grouse: A Guide to the Pheasants, Partridges, Quails, Grouse, Guineafowl, Buttonquails and Sandgrouse of the World", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Species limits, subspecies groups, field characters, measurements, and confusion species across Phasianus." }, { "id": "iucn-birdlife-colchicus", "title": "Phasianus colchicus (Common Pheasant) - IUCN Red List assessment", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Global conservation status (Least Concern), native versus introduced range, and principal threats." }, { "id": "cornell-bow-rinphe", "title": "Ring-necked Pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) species account, Birds of the World", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Natural history, biometrics, clutch size, introduced North American populations, and English naming as ring-necked pheasant." }, { "id": "ioc-wbl", "title": "IOC World Bird List - Phasianus colchicus (Common Pheasant)", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Current English and scientific names and the split of Japanese green pheasant (P. versicolor) as a neighbour species." }, { "id": "linnaeus-1758", "title": "Systema Naturae, 10th edition", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Original Linnean description and the type locality tradition for P. colchicus." }, { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q25432: Common Pheasant", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25432", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Common pheasant", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_pheasant", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "pheasant-recognition", "name": "Pheasant Recognition", "description": "Establish whether the encounter belongs to Common Pheasant and how confidently the individual can be described.", "rationale": "Sex, age and atypical appearance can make a single plumage cue misleading.", "layers": [ { "id": "species-assignment", "name": "Species Assignment", "description": "Connect the registry concept to an evidence-supported biological identification.", "findings": [ { "id": "taxonomic-anchor", "name": "Taxonomic Anchor", "description": "Use Phasianus colchicus as the provisional species anchor, recording the adopted authority and version. [RSPB species account](https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/pheasant)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which taxonomic authority and version define Phasianus colchicus for this identification?", "kind": "definition", "id": "taxonomic-anchor-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence support Common Pheasant, or should the record remain an unresolved pheasant identification?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "taxonomic-anchor-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "appearance-and-individuality", "name": "Appearance and Individuality", "description": "Interpret observed features in their sex, age and individual context.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognition-evidence", "name": "Recognition Evidence", "description": "Record visible head, body and tail features, their visibility and alternative explanations; distinguish species identification from recognition of the same individual.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observed features support the sex and life-stage assessment, and which are obscured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recognition-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Could incomplete tail growth, feather loss or atypical plumage explain the apparent mismatch?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recognition-evidence-q02" }, { "text": "What ring, marking or encounter evidence supports treating two sightings as the same bird?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recognition-evidence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "origin-and-living-context", "name": "Origin and Living Context", "description": "Separate where a pheasant came from, where it lives now and who has documented responsibility for it.", "rationale": "Introductions and gamebird releases make location alone an unreliable account of origin. [RSPB species account](https://www.rspb.org.uk/birds-and-wildlife/pheasant)", "layers": [ { "id": "hatch-and-release-history", "name": "Hatch and Release History", "description": "Preserve documentary evidence of rearing, captivity and release.", "findings": [ { "id": "origin-evidence", "name": "Origin Evidence", "description": "Represent origin as an evidence-backed history, allowing unknown origin and uncertain matches to release records.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is there a hatch, breeder, ring or release record that can be matched to this individual?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "origin-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Is captive-reared or wild-hatched origin documented, inferred or unknown?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "origin-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "present-context", "name": "Present Context", "description": "Describe current freedom of movement and relationships to holding sites or local populations.", "findings": [ { "id": "residence-and-responsibility", "name": "Residence and Responsibility", "description": "Keep enclosure status, local occurrence and documented responsibility separate from ancestry and inferred ownership.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the bird currently enclosed, temporarily held or free-ranging, and when was that established?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "residence-and-responsibility-q01" }, { "text": "Which records support a relationship to a keeper, release site or local population?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "residence-and-responsibility-q02" }, { "text": "What remains unresolved about responsibility before a handling or transfer decision?", "kind": "action", "id": "residence-and-responsibility-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-ground-living", "name": "Condition and Ground Living", "description": "Assess functional condition without confusing ordinary ground activity with incapacity.", "rationale": "Pheasants commonly walk or run and may fly when disturbed; failure to observe flight is insufficient evidence of injury. [Cornell identification](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/id)", "layers": [ { "id": "movement-and-injury", "name": "Movement and Injury", "description": "Record spontaneous locomotion and observable physical abnormalities.", "findings": [ { "id": "functional-mobility", "name": "Functional Mobility", "description": "Describe gait, weight-bearing, wing carriage and any spontaneous flight, preserving what was not assessed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the bird bear weight symmetrically and move without a visible limp or persistent wing droop?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "functional-mobility-q01" }, { "text": "Was flight observed spontaneously, or is flight capability simply unknown?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "functional-mobility-q02" }, { "text": "Which observed impairment warrants referral to a qualified wildlife or veterinary service?", "kind": "action", "id": "functional-mobility-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "feeding-and-condition", "name": "Feeding and Condition", "description": "Relate feeding observations to measured condition and access to resources.", "findings": [ { "id": "feeding-function", "name": "Feeding Function", "description": "Record actual food intake and condition evidence without treating a brief absence of feeding as failure to feed.", "questions": [ { "text": "What food was taken and swallowed, over what observation period?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "feeding-function-q01" }, { "text": "Are comparable mass or professionally assessed body-condition observations available?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "feeding-function-q02" }, { "text": "Does the evidence indicate poor access, possible impairment or insufficient observation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "feeding-function-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "breeding-and-dependent-young", "name": "Breeding and Dependent Young", "description": "Represent breeding evidence and dependencies relevant to disturbance or intervention.", "rationale": "Ground nests and mobile chicks require different interpretations of presence, absence and vulnerability. [Cornell life history](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/lifehistory)", "layers": [ { "id": "breeding-evidence", "name": "Breeding Evidence", "description": "Distinguish display, mating association and confirmed nesting.", "findings": [ { "id": "breeding-stage", "name": "Breeding Stage", "description": "Record observed breeding behaviour without converting male display or proximity between birds into proof of an active nest.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports display, courtship, laying, incubation or brood attendance?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "breeding-stage-q01" }, { "text": "Is the nest association directly observed or inferred from nearby pheasant activity?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "breeding-stage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "brood-dependency", "name": "Brood Dependency", "description": "Track young in relation to an attending female and distinguish mobility from independence.", "findings": [ { "id": "chick-attendance", "name": "Chick Attendance", "description": "Chicks leave the nest and feed themselves while following the female; being mobile does not establish independence. [Cornell life history](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/lifehistory)", "questions": [ { "text": "How many chicks and attending adults were observed, with what visibility and observation duration?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "chick-attendance-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes temporary separation from loss of attendance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "chick-attendance-q02" }, { "text": "Could the proposed approach, capture or movement separate the brood?", "kind": "action", "id": "chick-attendance-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "habitat-use-and-exposure", "name": "Habitat Use and Exposure", "description": "Connect the individual to the places and immediate hazards shaping its state.", "rationale": "Feeding areas, concealment and nesting cover can have different values and risks for the same pheasant.", "layers": [ { "id": "functional-habitat", "name": "Functional Habitat", "description": "Record what the bird actually does at a site.", "findings": [ { "id": "resource-use", "name": "Resource Use", "description": "Separate observed feeding, sheltering, roosting and nesting use from suitability inferred from vegetation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which site functions are directly observed for this bird, and at what times?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "resource-use-q01" }, { "text": "Which resources or cover are accessible, and which are separated by barriers?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "resource-use-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "immediate-hazards", "name": "Immediate Hazards", "description": "Describe the bird's exposure to a specific impending or ongoing disturbance.", "findings": [ { "id": "road-and-machinery-exposure", "name": "Road and Machinery Exposure", "description": "Road traffic and agricultural machinery are documented pheasant hazards; record actual proximity and activity before recommending a response. [Cornell life history](https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Ring-necked_Pheasant/lifehistory)", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the bird, associated nest or brood within an active traffic or machinery path?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "road-and-machinery-exposure-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes the timing and severity of the exposure?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "road-and-machinery-exposure-q02" }, { "text": "Which site-level adjustment could reduce exposure without moving the bird?", "kind": "action", "id": "road-and-machinery-exposure-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "pheasant-intervention-decisions", "name": "Pheasant Intervention Decisions", "description": "Determine whether a specific proposed interaction is justified, authorised and assessable.", "rationale": "Observation, rehabilitation, game management and release involve different purposes and cannot share an assumed permission.", "layers": [ { "id": "authority-and-purpose", "name": "Authority and Purpose", "description": "Bind each proposed action to its reason and applicable external rules.", "findings": [ { "id": "action-specific-authority", "name": "Action-Specific Authority", "description": "Require current, location-specific evidence for decisions about capture, keeping, relocation, release or harvest; this draft supplies no jurisdictional permission.", "questions": [ { "text": "What precise action is proposed, for what purpose and at which location and date?", "kind": "action", "id": "action-specific-authority-q01" }, { "text": "Which current authority or documented permission governs that action?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "action-specific-authority-q02" }, { "text": "Does unresolved identity, origin or responsibility prevent the decision from being made?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "action-specific-authority-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "intervention-readiness", "name": "Intervention Readiness", "description": "Connect a permitted action to the bird's condition, dependencies and subsequent assessment.", "findings": [ { "id": "handling-and-release-readiness", "name": "Handling and Release Readiness", "description": "Record the specialist assessment, receiving context and observable outcome criteria needed for a proposed handling, care or release workflow.", "questions": [ { "text": "What assessment supports proceeding given the bird's mobility, feeding state and brood relationships?", "kind": "action", "id": "handling-and-release-readiness-q01" }, { "text": "For transfer or release, which receiving-site and health requirements have been verified?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "handling-and-release-readiness-q02" }, { "text": "What follow-up observations would establish success or trigger reassessment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "handling-and-release-readiness-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Colchian / black-necked pheasant (P. c. colchicus group; no white collar)", "Chinese ring-necked pheasant (P. c. torquatus group; white neck-ring)", "Mongolian pheasant (P. c. mongolicus)", "Korean pheasant (P. c. karpowi)", "Pallas's / Manchurian pheasant (P. c. pallasi)", "Commercial ring-necked hybrid (European and North American hunting-release stock)", "Melanistic mutant (dark game-farm morph)", "White / leucistic ornamental morph" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Linnean binomen", "value_or_pattern": "Phasianus colchicus Linnaeus, 1758", "note": "Type species of Phasianus; authority and year are stable across major checklists." }, { "scheme": "Wikidata", "value_or_pattern": "Q25432", "note": "Item for the common pheasant as a taxon." }, { "scheme": "ITIS TSN", "value_or_pattern": "175905", "note": "Integrated Taxonomic Information System taxonomic serial number." }, { "scheme": "NCBI Taxonomy", "value_or_pattern": "9054", "note": "Taxon ID used in sequence databases." }, { "scheme": "eBird / Clements species code", "value_or_pattern": "rinphe", "note": "North American English name on this checklist is Ring-necked Pheasant." }, { "scheme": "IOC English name", "value_or_pattern": "Common Pheasant", "note": "Contrasts with Green Pheasant for P. versicolor." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "IUCN Red List assessment for Phasianus colchicus, compiled by BirdLife International (currently Least Concern globally).", "EU Birds Directive 2009/147/EC, Annex II - listed as a huntable species where national law allows.", "United Kingdom Game Act 1831 and Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 - gamebird status, close seasons, and related taking rules.", "Defra (UK) Code of Practice for the Welfare of Gamebirds Reared for Sporting Purposes - rearing, transport, and release of farmed pheasants.", "WOAH (OIE) Terrestrial Animal Health Code - farmed pheasants treated as poultry for notifiable diseases such as highly pathogenic avian influenza.", "Subnational hunting codes (US state wildlife agencies, especially the Midwest; equivalent provincial/national game laws elsewhere) set seasons, sex rules, and bag limits." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Released in large numbers for driven and walked-up shooting in Britain, Ireland, and parts of continental Europe.", "Upland gamebird hunted on farmland and prairie in the northern United States and southern Canada (there called ring-necked pheasant).", "Reared on game farms for release and, to a lesser extent, slaughtered for meat and sold as pheasant.", "Kept as an ornamental aviary bird, including white and melanistic colour morphs.", "State bird of South Dakota; a familiar countryside bird and sporting quarry rather than a conservation flagship in most of its introduced range." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Adult male body mass", "typical_range": "0.9-1.5", "unit": "kg" }, { "quantity": "Adult female body mass", "typical_range": "0.7-1.1", "unit": "kg" }, { "quantity": "Adult male total length including tail", "typical_range": "60-89", "unit": "cm" }, { "quantity": "Adult female total length", "typical_range": "50-63", "unit": "cm" }, { "quantity": "Adult male tail length", "typical_range": "35-54", "unit": "cm" }, { "quantity": "Wingspan", "typical_range": "70-90", "unit": "cm" }, { "quantity": "Clutch size", "typical_range": "8-15", "unit": "eggs" }, { "quantity": "Typical wild lifespan", "typical_range": "1-3 (rarely >10)", "unit": "years" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Very high first-year mortality of reared, released birds from predation and weak anti-predator behaviour.", "Vehicle collision (roadkill) on farmland roads.", "Highly pathogenic avian influenza and other poultry pathogens in intensive rearing sheds.", "Lead-shot ingestion and other hunting-related injury.", "Loss of nesting cover (hedgerows, grassland, wetland edge) collapsing wild-breeding populations even where releases continue.", "Genetic swamping of named native subspecies by repeated release of hybrid game-farm stock.", "In some introduced or island settings, additional predation or disturbance pressure on native ground fauna." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "In North American English the established bird is almost always called ring-necked pheasant; in British and IOC usage the species name is common pheasant, and 'pheasant' unqualified usually means this species.", "Native-range practice treats many subspecies as locally distinct (black-necked Colchian birds versus collared Chinese and Mongolian forms); European and American hunting stocks are mixed hybrids that no longer match a single wild subspecies.", "UK and Irish encounter is dominated by annual game-farm release and driven shooting; US prairie management more often targets a self-sustaining or habitat-limited wild population.", "Japan's national bird is the related green pheasant (P. versicolor), not P. colchicus; common pheasant is the introduced or continental form.", "Some jurisdictions treat the bird as a valued game species, others as an introduced or potentially invasive alien." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Green pheasant (Phasianus versicolor)", "difference": "Male is largely iridescent green rather than copper-maroon; native to Japan and treated as a separate species on the IOC list." }, { "name": "Golden pheasant (Chrysolophus pictus)", "difference": "Much smaller; male has a golden crest and a barred orange ruff, not a bare red facial skin and long uniformly tapering pheasant tail of P. colchicus." }, { "name": "Reeve's pheasant (Syrmaticus reevesii)", "difference": "Male has a strongly scaled body and an extremely long white-and-chestnut tail; lacks the common pheasant's red wattle-and-ear-tuft head pattern." }, { "name": "Grey partridge (Perdix perdix)", "difference": "Far smaller, short-tailed, rusty-faced covey bird; no long pointed tail or male copper plumage." }, { "name": "Red junglefowl / feral chicken (Gallus gallus)", "difference": "Cocks have a fleshy comb and arched sickle tail feathers, not a long straight pointed tail and ear tufts." }, { "name": "Lady Amherst's pheasant (Chrysolophus amherstiae)", "difference": "Male shows a black-and-white cape and green mantle; different genus and ornamental rather than standard quarry stock." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Common Pheasant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which taxonomic authority should fix the registry boundary around Phasianus colchicus, particularly for Green Pheasant comparisons and suspected hybrids?", "Which identification criteria reliably cover juveniles, neck-ring variation and atypical captive strains across the intended geographic range?", "Which validated age- and sex-specific condition measures and referral thresholds should govern assessment?", "Which breeding, feeding and habitat expectations remain valid beyond the predominantly North American and UK references reviewed?", "Which jurisdictions and management contexts must the action model support, and which authoritative rules and specialist protocols apply in each?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 13, "findings": 20, "questions": 40 } }