{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:26:42Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09526-c264-74d1-b520-bc9feb00a15f\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Imprimi potest\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 ", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 62.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09526-c25e-79e1-8b83-61918a50076a\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Imprimi potest\nRegistry id: vr.tr.imprimi-potest\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (no" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:40:34+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:29+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q2672555", "registryId": "vr.tr.imprimi-potest", "name": "Imprimi potest", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2672555/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.imprimi-potest", "name": "Imprimi potest", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognize an Imprimi potest, establish which religious superior authorized which writing, and determine the permission's documented scope and remaining publication requirements.", "definition": "Imprimi potest is an authorization, conventionally expressed in Latin as \"it may be printed,\" given by the competent religious superior for a member of a Catholic religious institute to publish a work, distinct from any required approval by the local ordinary.", "scope_statement": "This model owns vr.tr.imprimi-potest as an ecclesiastical permission and its recorded declaration, provisionally situated in XCT / XCT.QLT; it models the authorization relationship rather than treating the permission as an intrinsic quality of a book.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of a declaration as Imprimi potest", "The issuing major superior's relationship to the author and religious institute", "The writing and version covered by the permission", "Evidence of examination, grant, conditions, and subsequent decisions", "Distinction from other ecclesiastical publication permissions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The complete governance model of a religious institute", "The manuscript's theological argument and substantive doctrinal assessment", "Nihil obstat and imprimatur as independently issued acts", "Copyright licenses, publishing contracts, and civil publication rights", "General certification of a work's factual accuracy or literary quality" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identifies permission from a religious author's major superior to publish religious material; the term's conventional meaning is documented in the [Catholic Culture dictionary](https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/dictionary/index.cfm?id=34129).", "Tests the issuer's capacity in relation to the author's institute, rather than recognizing any cleric's signature as sufficient.", "Separates the superior's permission from a censor's favorable judgment and from the local ordinary's publication authorization.", "Requires an identifiable writing within the grant's scope; a publisher's generic approval statement is insufficient evidence.", "Records an authorization to publish without inferring endorsement of every opinion, factual claim, or proposed use." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Declaration wording", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Exact transcription; explicit Imprimi potest formula; alternative formula requiring interpretation", "why_it_matters": "Preserves the evidence needed to classify the declaration without silently equating different formulas." }, { "name": "Issuing authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named issuer, office, religious institute, and documented competence at grant date", "why_it_matters": "Permission depends on the issuer's authority in relation to the author." }, { "name": "Author's institute relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Author, institute, membership evidence, and relevant date", "why_it_matters": "Establishes why this superior's permission is relevant to this writing." }, { "name": "Authorized textual object", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Title, author, language, manuscript identifier, edition, and revision identifier where available", "why_it_matters": "Prevents permission for one text from being assigned automatically to another." }, { "name": "Grant evidence state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unverified assertion; printed notice located; issuing record located; conflicting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Separates an observed claim of permission from corroborated issuance." }, { "name": "Documented disposition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Requested; granted; refused; subsequently modified; subsequently withdrawn; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports decisions from explicit records without inventing expiry or withdrawal." }, { "name": "Express conditions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Transcribed conditions; expressly unconditional; conditions not established", "why_it_matters": "Determines what must be checked before relying on the grant." }, { "name": "Related ecclesiastical acts", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked censor judgment, nihil obstat, imprimatur, or other required authorization", "why_it_matters": "Keeps distinct acts connected without treating one as a substitute for all others." } ], "affordances": [ "Extract an Imprimi potest notice and link it to its source page and corresponding writing.", "Check the issuing office against the author's institute relationship and applicable rules.", "Compare the proposed publication text with the text identified in the grant.", "Identify missing evidence, unmet conditions, and separate permissions requiring investigation.", "Explain precisely what the documented permission supports and what remains unestablished." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain what an imprimi potest is and how it differs from a nihil obstat and an imprimatur.", "Record the imprimi potest printed in a work with its date and the authorizing superior." ], "must_not": [ "Fabricate or add an imprimi potest to a work that did not receive one.", "Present it as a declaration that a work is free of error or endorsed in all its content.", "Use it to misrepresent an author's standing with their religious order." ], "requires_human": [ "Requesting or issuing such authorization on behalf of a member of a religious institute." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "The authorization belongs to a religious community's own governance and should be described respectfully.", "False claims of approval can mislead readers about a work's standing." ], "affected_parties": [ "Authors who are members of religious institutes", "Readers", "Religious communities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The competent major superior of the religious institute who grants it.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "The Latin words imprimi potest on the copyright page, with the name of a religious superior and a date.", "Often printed together with nihil obstat and imprimatur." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Forged or misattributed approvals deceive readers and communities." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Imprimi potest is encountered in Catholic publishing when a member of a religious institute obtains permission from the competent superior to publish a work.", "It can appear in a book's preliminary pages or accompanying authorization records to document the superior's permission.", "Its scope is assessed alongside any separate ecclesiastical approval required for the work." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Canon 832 of the Code of Canon Law, promulgated by the Holy See, requires members of religious institutes to obtain their major superior's permission according to their constitutions before publishing writings on religion or morals." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q2672555: Imprimi potest", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2672555", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Imprimi potest", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imprimi_potest", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "permission-identity", "name": "Permission identity", "description": "Recognize the superior's permission and distinguish its legal function from neighboring approval terms.", "rationale": "The Latin formula alone cannot establish the complete authorization relationship.", "layers": [ { "id": "formula-and-act", "name": "Formula and act", "description": "Connect the observed wording to a specific permission.", "findings": [ { "id": "declaration-identification", "name": "Declaration identification", "description": "Record the exact notice and evidence that it represents a superior's grant rather than a quotation, template, or editorial assertion.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exact wording identifies this notice as an Imprimi potest?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declaration-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Where is the notice recorded, and is it an issued declaration or merely a reproduction or reference?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "declaration-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighboring-approvals", "name": "Neighboring approvals", "description": "Distinguish permissions and review judgments appearing alongside the declaration.", "findings": [ { "id": "separate-authorization-functions", "name": "Separate authorization functions", "description": "Keep the censor's assessment, the superior's permission, and any local ordinary's authorization as separately evidenced acts.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which accompanying notices are censor judgments, and which are grants by an ecclesiastical authority?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "separate-authorization-functions-q01" }, { "text": "What additional authorization must be investigated before treating publication as permitted?", "kind": "action", "id": "separate-authorization-functions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "superior-and-applicability", "name": "Superior and applicability", "description": "Establish who may grant permission and why the requirement applies to this author and writing.", "rationale": "An authentic signature does not by itself establish the signer's competence for the case.", "layers": [ { "id": "institute-authority", "name": "Institute authority", "description": "Record the author, institute, issuing office, and applicable constitutional provisions.", "findings": [ { "id": "competent-major-superior", "name": "Competent major superior", "description": "Canon 832 requires members of religious institutes to obtain their major superior's permission, according to their constitutions, for writings on religion or morals. [Code of Canon Law, canon 832](https://www.vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib3-cann822-833_en.html)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which records establish the author's institute membership and the issuer's relevant office when permission was granted?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competent-major-superior-q01" }, { "text": "Which provision of the institute's constitutions establishes competence or procedure for this grant?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "competent-major-superior-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-regime", "name": "Subject and governing regime", "description": "Identify the writing's relevant subject and the rules applicable at the time.", "findings": [ { "id": "applicability-basis", "name": "Applicability basis", "description": "Record the grounds for applying the permission requirement; do not project contemporary Latin canon law automatically onto historical or other ecclesial contexts.", "questions": [ { "text": "What aspects of this writing place it within questions of religion or morals?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "applicability-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which dated canonical and institute rules governed this author and grant?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "applicability-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "review-and-grant-evidence", "name": "Review and grant evidence", "description": "Connect examination of the writing to the superior's documented decision.", "rationale": "A favorable review and an actual grant are different evidentiary steps.", "layers": [ { "id": "prior-examination", "name": "Prior examination", "description": "Identify evidence of the assessment supporting the superior's decision.", "findings": [ { "id": "censor-judgment", "name": "Censor judgment", "description": "The 1992 instruction directs the competent religious superior to obtain a prior judgment from at least one trusted censor and satisfy himself that the writing contains nothing harmful to faith or morals. [Instruction, article 17](https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19920330_istruzione-pccs_en.html)", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence identifies the censor's judgment and the text examined?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "censor-judgment-q01" }, { "text": "Were revisions requested, and what evidence connects the revised text to the subsequent grant?", "kind": "action", "id": "censor-judgment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "decision-record", "name": "Decision record", "description": "Capture the grant independently of reviews and printed claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-superior-decision", "name": "Documented superior decision", "description": "Preserve the decision's wording, issuer, date, reference identifier, conditions, and available corroboration.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which issuing record or publication notice supplies the decision, date, and signatory?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-superior-decision-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence establish a grant, a conditional grant, a refusal, or only a request?", "kind": "definition", "id": "documented-superior-decision-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "textual-scope-and-reliance", "name": "Textual scope and reliance", "description": "Determine whether a proposed publication falls within the documented permission.", "rationale": "A permission notice can be reproduced in a context whose connection to the authorized text has not been established.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorized-version", "name": "Authorized version", "description": "Bind the permission to identifiable textual and publication boundaries.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-correspondence", "name": "Version correspondence", "description": "Compare the text proposed for publication with the grant's identified manuscript or edition, flagging translations and revisions for assessment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which manuscript, language, edition, or revision does the grant explicitly identify?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "version-correspondence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes whether the proposed text's changes fall within the permission's scope?", "kind": "action", "id": "version-correspondence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reliance-decision", "name": "Reliance decision", "description": "Assess conditions and later evidence before relying on the permission.", "findings": [ { "id": "permission-use-assessment", "name": "Permission use assessment", "description": "Report whether reliance is supported, conditional, or unresolved, while preserving distinctions between this grant and the full set of publication requirements.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which express conditions remain unmet, and is there evidence of a later modification or withdrawal?", "kind": "action", "id": "permission-use-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "What can the agent conclude from this permission alone, and which conclusions require separate authorization records?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "permission-use-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This account is recalled knowledge, not source-verified research.", "Check the relevant institute's constitutions for the competent authority, procedure, and scope of permission.", "Canon 832 supplies the underlying permission requirement; verify separately whether a particular institute requires the printed formula \"imprimi potest.\"" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Catholic Church, Code of Canon Law (1983), canon 832: members of religious institutes require permission from their major superior, according to their constitutions, to publish writings concerning religion or morals.", "The constitutions of the relevant religious institute govern the superior's permission within the framework of canon law." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Records a religious superior's permission for publication of a member's writing.", "May appear in a Catholic book's preliminary pages alongside the authorizing superior's name and the date.", "Forms part of a publication approval process that may also involve a nihil obstat and an imprimatur." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Mistaking a superior's permission for an imprimatur issued by the competent ecclesiastical ordinary.", "Treating the authorization as a guarantee of factual accuracy or endorsement of every opinion in the work.", "Assuming that permission for one edition automatically covers a revised edition or translation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The cited 1983 Code governs the Latin Church; Eastern Catholic publication requirements must be checked against their own canon law.", "Procedures and the competent superior can vary between religious institutes according to their constitutions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Imprimatur", "difference": "An imprimatur is publication permission granted by the competent ecclesiastical ordinary; imprimi potest records permission from the author's religious superior." }, { "name": "Nihil obstat", "difference": "A nihil obstat records a censor's finding that no obstacle concerning faith or morals was identified; imprimi potest is the superior's authorization to publish." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Imprimi potest this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should the registry's XCT / XCT.QLT placement represent the permission's normative status, or should an authorization-act model elsewhere own the underlying act?", "Which historical and institute-specific uses of Imprimi potest differ from the contemporary Latin canonical framework?", "Under which documented rules may an issuer act through delegation, and what evidence establishes that delegation?", "How do applicable institute rules treat translations, revised editions, digital publication, and reuse of a printed permission notice?", "Which procedures govern modification or withdrawal, and how can later decisions be verified when the original grant survives only in a printed book?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }