{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:25:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b7-b843-7840-a0a9-cfd96858f671\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: castellany\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.PLC\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regi", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 74.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b7-b856-7e82-90d0-7a9fee48a8c1\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: castellany\nRegistry id: vr.tr.castellany\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.PLC\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:43:45+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q2749147", "registryId": "vr.tr.castellany", "name": "castellany", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.PLC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2749147/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.castellany", "name": "castellany", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a castellany as a historically situated castle-associated territory or jurisdiction, assess evidence for its extent and authority, and make qualified comparisons across time.", "definition": "A castellany is a historical territorial jurisdiction centred on a castle and administered by a castellan or equivalent officer on behalf of a lord or ruler.", "scope_statement": "For vr.tr.castellany in PHY / PHY.PLC, this model owns the territorial sense: land or a district associated with a castle and a castellan's jurisdiction; the word can also denote the office or rank, so each occurrence requires sense checking ([Dictionary.com](https://www.dictionary.com/browse/castellany)).", "in_scope": [ "Identification of a particular castellany by historical name, regional terminology and period", "Association with its governing castle or historically attested administrative seat", "Documented settlements, dependencies, boundaries and territorial exceptions", "Territorially applicable powers and obligations, with their holders and dates", "Formation, transfer, subdivision, absorption and survival as a historical place-name", "Evidence supporting or contesting each territorial reconstruction" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The castle's architecture, fabric and conservation condition", "The castellan's biography, rank and office considered independently of the territory", "Complete models of the encompassing kingdom, lordship or administrative system", "Individual estates and property titles except where they establish castellany membership", "Population histories and settlement economies beyond their relationship to the castellany" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A candidate must have evidence of castle-associated territorial or jurisdictional identity; proximity to a castle alone is insufficient.", "A reference to appointment, salary or rank must be checked for the office sense before it identifies a geographic castellany.", "The castle site and the castellany must be distinguishable as seat and associated territory, even where the territory's extent remains unknown.", "A castle owner's estate must not be equated with a castellany without evidence that ownership and the relevant jurisdiction coincide.", "Shared names with a town, parish or later district establish a possible relationship, not identical boundaries or institutional continuity." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Attested territorial designation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Original term, language, spelling, dated occurrence and interpreted sense", "why_it_matters": "Separates territorial references from references to an office and prevents unsupported equivalence between regional terms." }, { "name": "Associated castle or seat", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Identified site or sites, relationship type and validity interval; unknown permitted", "why_it_matters": "Establishes the castle association without assuming that a surviving castle remained the administrative seat throughout." }, { "name": "Attested temporal extent", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Earliest and latest attestations, explicit creation or termination dates where available, and date uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the surviving documentary span from being mistaken for the full lifespan." }, { "name": "Territorial reconstruction", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Settlement list, boundary description, partial geometry, reconstructed polygon or unknown; dated and source-attributed", "why_it_matters": "Allows useful geographic identification without requiring an invented continuous boundary." }, { "name": "Reconstructed area", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "km², with reconstruction date, coordinate reference system, method and uncertainty; unknown permitted", "why_it_matters": "Makes size comparisons conditional on defensible geometry." }, { "name": "Jurisdictional competence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source-attested military, judicial, fiscal or other competence, each with geographic reach and dates", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the label castellany from implying the same powers in every region." }, { "name": "Authority relationships", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Castellan, delegating authority, superior jurisdiction and competing claimant, with dated roles", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes administration, ownership, superior authority and disputed control." }, { "name": "Historical continuity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Attested functioning, reorganised, absorbed, abolished, name-only survival or uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation of later references without assuming the institution still operated." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a historical reference as territorial castellany, castellan's office or unresolved usage.", "Locate an attested castellany through its castle, dependencies and dated geographic evidence.", "Test whether a settlement belonged to the castellany for a specified period and jurisdictional function.", "Compare competing boundary reconstructions while preserving their sources and claimants.", "Trace changes in territorial identity and authority through transfers or administrative reforms.", "Link records to an existing castellany identity or defer merging when continuity is unproven." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe castellanies and their roles in medieval administration from historical sources.", "Identify the castle, territory and period of a particular castellany with citations." ], "must_not": [ "Present a reconstructed boundary as precise when the sources are vague.", "Use historical jurisdictions to support present-day territorial or property claims.", "Attribute deeds to named castellans without evidence." ], "requires_human": [ "Using historical jurisdiction data in legal or heritage disputes." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Medieval jurisdictions involved forced labour and justice over peasants; history should not romanticize them.", "Old boundaries are sometimes invoked in modern disputes." ], "affected_parties": [ "Researchers and students", "Local communities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody now; historical archives hold the records of each castellany.", "master_systems": [ "Historical archives" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Historical maps showing territories grouped around a castle seat." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Anachronistic mapping that misleads modern readers." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q2749147: castellany", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2749147", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Castellania", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castellania", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "territorial-identity", "name": "Territorial identity", "description": "Determine what a castellany reference identifies within its own historical setting.", "rationale": "The same term can refer to territory or office, and translation can conceal regional differences.", "layers": [ { "id": "name-and-sense", "name": "Name and sense", "description": "Resolve dated names and distinguish territorial usage from office terminology.", "findings": [ { "id": "territorial-attestation", "name": "Territorial attestation", "description": "Record evidence that the named castellany denotes a district or territorial jurisdiction.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the passage describe land, dependent settlements or territorial jurisdiction, or only the office of a castellan?", "kind": "definition", "id": "territorial-attestation-q01" }, { "text": "What original spelling, language, document date and passage support this interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "territorial-attestation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "castle-association", "name": "Castle association", "description": "Identify the castle or seat through which this territorial identity is understood.", "findings": [ { "id": "seat-identification", "name": "Seat identification", "description": "Distinguish an attested governing seat from a same-named settlement or a merely nearby fortification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which castle or administrative seat is explicitly associated with this castellany, and during which period?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "seat-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence distinguish the castle site, its immediate estate and the wider castellany?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "seat-identification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "territory-and-dependencies", "name": "Territory and dependencies", "description": "Reconstruct where the castellany extended and which places belonged to it.", "rationale": "A historical jurisdiction may be evidenced by named dependencies rather than a surveyed perimeter.", "layers": [ { "id": "dependent-places", "name": "Dependent places", "description": "Establish membership of villages, estates and other locations without treating every association as territorial inclusion.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-membership", "name": "Dated membership", "description": "Qualify each place's association by date, function and evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which settlements or lands are explicitly included, and is their relationship administrative, judicial, fiscal or military?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dated-membership-q01" }, { "text": "What document and historical place identification support each membership assertion?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-membership-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "extent-reconstruction", "name": "Extent reconstruction", "description": "Represent documented boundaries, gaps, exceptions and competing interpretations.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualified-geography", "name": "Qualified geography", "description": "Keep source-described limits distinct from modern reconstructed geometry.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which limits, exclusions or detached dependencies are attested, and which are inferred by a named claimant or researcher?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualified-geography-q01" }, { "text": "If geometry or area is supplied, what date, coordinate reference system, reconstruction method and uncertainty accompany it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "qualified-geography-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "castle-based-authority", "name": "Castle-based authority", "description": "Describe the powers exercised over the castellany and the relationships authorising them.", "rationale": "Territorial membership becomes meaningful through particular powers whose reach must be established separately.", "layers": [ { "id": "holders-and-superiors", "name": "Holders and superiors", "description": "Identify who administered the castellany and under whose authority.", "findings": [ { "id": "authority-chain", "name": "Authority chain", "description": "Separate the castellan's administrative role from castle ownership and superior territorial authority.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who administered the castellany at the selected date, and what evidence establishes the appointment or entitlement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authority-chain-q01" }, { "text": "Which superior authority or overlapping jurisdiction constrained that administration?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "authority-chain-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "powers-and-obligations", "name": "Powers and obligations", "description": "Establish which functions connected dependent places to the castle administration.", "findings": [ { "id": "functional-reach", "name": "Functional reach", "description": "Record only evidenced powers and obligations, allowing their geographic coverage to differ.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which judicial, fiscal, defensive or maintenance functions are documented for this castellany?", "kind": "definition", "id": "functional-reach-q01" }, { "text": "Did each function apply to the same places and people, or were there exemptions and separate territorial limits?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "functional-reach-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence would justify attributing a particular levy, summons or castle-service obligation to this castellany?", "kind": "action", "id": "functional-reach-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-change-and-resolution", "name": "Historical change and resolution", "description": "Track transformation of the castellany and govern reconciliation of its historical records.", "rationale": "Persistence of a castle or name does not by itself establish continuity of the territorial jurisdiction.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-transitions", "name": "Institutional transitions", "description": "Distinguish first attestation, creation, transfer, reorganisation and termination.", "findings": [ { "id": "continuity-through-change", "name": "Continuity through change", "description": "Assess whether changes preserve the same castellany or establish a predecessor-successor relationship.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dated evidence establishes creation, transfer, subdivision, absorption or abolition, as opposed to first or last surviving mention?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "continuity-through-change-q01" }, { "text": "After a change of holder, seat or territory, what supports treating the castellany as the same entity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "continuity-through-change-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "record-reconciliation", "name": "Record reconciliation", "description": "Connect documentary references, historical gazetteers and modern place identifiers without collapsing distinct entities.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-qualified-linking", "name": "Evidence-qualified linking", "description": "Guide merges and mappings through dated identity evidence while retaining unresolved alternatives.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does a proposed gazetteer or Wikidata identifier identify the castellany itself, its castle, its namesake settlement or a later district?", "kind": "definition", "id": "evidence-qualified-linking-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence permits merging two castellany references, and which conflicting dates or dependencies require keeping them separate?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-qualified-linking-q02" }, { "text": "Which conflicting reconstructions must remain attributed alternatives in the agent's output?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidence-qualified-linking-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded: this answer assumes the historical territorial meaning, consistent with domain PHY.PLC.", "A particular castellany's extent, dates, powers and administrative dependencies require evidence specific to its region and period.", "This is a recall-based description; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of castellany this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Organising the defence and administration of a castle and its dependent territory.", "Defining a district for collecting dues, revenues or services.", "Providing a territorial framework for exercising delegated judicial authority where local institutions assigned that function." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of castellany this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Confusing the territorial jurisdiction with the castle building or the office of castellan.", "Treating boundaries and administrative powers as fixed across different periods.", "Assuming that castellanies in different political systems had identical functions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of castellany this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "French châtellenies varied in their judicial, fiscal and territorial functions across lordships and periods.", "In medieval Poland, castellanies formed territorial districts associated with fortified centres; their development differed from that of western European castle lordships." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of castellany this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "castle", "difference": "A castle is a fortified structure; a castellany is the jurisdiction associated with a castle." }, { "name": "castellan", "difference": "A castellan is an officer or officeholder; a castellany is the territorial jurisdiction administered." }, { "name": "lordship", "difference": "A lordship denotes a lord's authority or domain more broadly and need not be organised around a castle." }, { "name": "manor", "difference": "A manor is an estate and associated tenurial or jurisdictional unit; a castellany is organised around a castle and can encompass multiple estates." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of castellany this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which underlying registry source fixes the intended sense of castellany, given that no definition is recorded?", "Which regional terms, including châtellenie and castellania, are equivalent in which periods, and where do their institutional meanings diverge?", "How should cases be recognised where the castellany name persists after the castle ceases to function as its seat?", "Which historical gazetteers and archival collections provide reliable castellany identities and dated dependency lists?", "What minimum evidence should support a territorial reconstruction when only scattered jurisdictional rights or settlement references survive?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 23 } }