{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T13:38:46Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00550494, "turns": 1, "seconds": 22.4, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c16-b9d0-7611-b2e0-8fbc729a57c7\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: beak\nRegistry id: vr.tr.beak\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy model s" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:38:55+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:30:07+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "definition" ], "answering_review": "c6130c17ec2a7d2bb5b5cad642870fede413b1a2e6a684e40a7a837a3e4dabf0" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q31528", "registryId": "vr.tr.beak", "name": "beak", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q31528/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.beak", "name": "beak", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a beak, record its functional condition and biological context, and judge which observations or interventions are appropriate.", "definition": "A beak is a keratinous, toothless rostrum of paired rhamphothecae covering the bony jaws in birds, or an analogous mouthpart in other animals, including keratinous structures in some other vertebrates and structures composed primarily of chitin and protein in cephalopods, with functions including feeding, preening and manipulation depending on the animal.", "scope_statement": "This model owns a biological beak as a distinct mouthpart assembly, including its working surfaces, opposing components, attachment, geometry and condition; it records the bearer and anatomical interpretation without assuming that all structures called beaks share the same construction.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of a biological beak and the anatomical components included in the instance", "Geometry of tips, edges, opposing surfaces and opening", "Material coverings, structural support and attachment where established", "Condition, wear, damage and changes in shape or alignment", "Observed use in feeding, manipulation and other bearer-specific activities", "Observation limits and conditions governing handling or intervention" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The bearer's complete anatomy, health history and behaviour", "Whole-animal diet, nutrition and husbandry plans", "Teeth, lips, tongues and neighbouring tissues except at their interfaces with the beak", "Artificial tools, architectural projections and decorative objects named or shaped like beaks", "Taxonomic classification and evolutionary relationships beyond identifying the beak's anatomical context" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Confirm that the structure is a biological mouthpart rather than a beak-shaped projection elsewhere on a body or manufactured object.", "Identify the structure used as the beak's working tip, edge or opposing surface; a pointed snout alone does not establish that it is a beak.", "Establish from observation or a suitable anatomical reference which coverings and supporting components constitute the beak; do not treat an exposed jaw or tooth as sufficient identification.", "Check the bearer's anatomical context before using bird-specific recognition criteria for another organism.", "Treat 'bill' as a possible alternative name requiring contextual resolution, rather than assuming it identifies a separate kind of mouthpart." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Bearer and anatomical interpretation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Bearer reference, supported taxonomic identification and anatomical reference", "why_it_matters": "Determines which structures, expected forms and functional comparisons apply." }, { "name": "Component completeness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Complete assembly, partial assembly, isolated component, fragment or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a fragment or single opposing component from being assessed as a complete beak." }, { "name": "Attachment context", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Attached to living bearer, attached to remains, detached specimen or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Changes what can be observed and whether an action may affect living tissue." }, { "name": "Landmarked dimensions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Length, width and depth in mm, with landmarks, method and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Supports repeatable shape comparisons without assuming one length convention fits every beak." }, { "name": "Tip and edge profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Described curvature, taper, edge relief and tip form, with image or reference", "why_it_matters": "Helps distinguish normal working geometry from wear or loss of material." }, { "name": "Opposing-component alignment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Expected relation, offset, crossing, unexpected gap or undetermined, relative to an applicable reference", "why_it_matters": "Alignment affects contact and use, but an unusual appearance alone does not establish a defect." }, { "name": "Surface and structural integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Location and extent of wear, cracks, chips, missing material, deformation or obscured areas", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes visible condition from assumptions about underlying damage." }, { "name": "Observed opening", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Gap in mm or angle in degrees, with posture, landmarks and observation conditions", "why_it_matters": "Records usable opening while separating voluntary movement from unobserved mechanical limits." }, { "name": "Demonstrated task performance", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Observed task, success or difficulty, context and observation date; unobserved where applicable", "why_it_matters": "Tests whether appearance corresponds to actual ability to use the beak." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify and document the beak's components and boundaries using bearer-specific anatomical evidence.", "Compare landmarked images and measurements to track changes in tip, edge and alignment.", "Observe how the bearer opens, closes and uses the beak during ordinary activities.", "Map visible damage or obstruction and flag uncertainty requiring qualified assessment.", "Assess whether proposed contact, restraint, sampling or modification is appropriate for the beak's attachment and tissue context.", "Document and preserve a detached beak specimen under an applicable collection protocol." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe beak shapes and functions from ornithological sources.", "Photograph and record beak features of wild birds without disturbing them for identification." ], "must_not": [ "Trim, alter or damage a bird's beak except as a veterinarian directs.", "Handle or capture wild birds to inspect their beaks without a licence.", "Trade in beaks or bills of protected species such as hornbills.", "Feed birds in ways that harm beak health, such as with unsuitable food." ], "requires_human": [ "Approving beak trimming in kept birds." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Beak trimming in farmed poultry causes pain and is contested as a welfare practice.", "Hornbill casques and other beak materials are poached for trade, threatening species." ], "affected_parties": [ "Wild and kept birds", "Bird keepers and farmers", "Conservation communities" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "For a living bird, its keeper or, for wild birds, nobody: protected by wildlife law.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "A hard, horn-like covering on the jaws, without teeth, projecting from the face.", "Shape varies by diet: hooked in raptors, long and thin in waders, short and conical in seed eaters." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Overgrown or damaged beaks can stop a bird from feeding.", "Large-beaked birds can bite and injure handlers." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which covers trade in parts of listed birds." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "A beak is encountered in animal observation, comparative anatomy, veterinary assessment and the study of fossil remains.", "Depending on the species, it supports feeding, grooming, carrying materials, manipulation and defence.", "Its shape and condition help observers interpret feeding adaptations and functional limitations in the animal's biological context." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "pending", "title": "Research in progress", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "" }, { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q31528: beak", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31528", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Beak", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beak", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "beak-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Beak identity and boundaries", "description": "Establish what counts as this beak and which anatomical interpretation applies.", "rationale": "The name alone does not specify construction, component boundaries or an appropriate comparison group.", "layers": [ { "id": "bearer-and-naming", "name": "Bearer and naming", "description": "Connect the beak designation to an identified bearer and evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "anatomical-identification", "name": "Anatomical identification", "description": "Record the basis for identifying this mouthpart as a beak, including unresolved naming.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which organism bears or originally bore this structure, and what evidence supports that identification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "anatomical-identification-q01" }, { "text": "What anatomical usage establishes this structure as a beak, and is 'bill' an alternative name in that usage?", "kind": "definition", "id": "anatomical-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "component-membership", "name": "Component membership", "description": "Set the instance boundary around the beak's identifiable parts.", "findings": [ { "id": "included-beak-components", "name": "Included beak components", "description": "Distinguish the complete assembly from a covering, supporting structure or fragment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this instance include both opposing components, their coverings and their support, or only a specified subset?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "included-beak-components-q01" }, { "text": "Where does the beak end and the neighbouring jaw, facial tissue or other mouthpart begin under the chosen anatomical convention?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "included-beak-components-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "working-geometry-and-construction", "name": "Working geometry and construction", "description": "Describe the surfaces and construction through which the beak contacts and acts on material.", "rationale": "Beak-specific decisions depend on tips, edges and opposing surfaces rather than overall size alone.", "layers": [ { "id": "tips-edges-and-contact", "name": "Tips, edges and contact", "description": "Capture repeatable shape measurements and relations between working surfaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "working-surface-profile", "name": "Working surface profile", "description": "Record tip shape, curvature, edge features and closure geometry against explicit landmarks.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the measured length, width, depth and curvature, and which landmarks and posture define each measurement?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "working-surface-profile-q01" }, { "text": "How do the tips and edges meet, overlap or remain separated during observed closure?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "working-surface-profile-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "covering-support-and-attachment", "name": "Covering, support and attachment", "description": "Identify established material regions and their connection to the bearer.", "findings": [ { "id": "beak-construction-evidence", "name": "Beak construction evidence", "description": "Separate externally visible surfaces from supported claims about internal structure and living tissue.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which coverings, supporting structures and attachment regions are established for this beak by observation or an anatomical source?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "beak-construction-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Where are the boundaries between exposed working material and underlying or adjoining living tissue, and which boundaries remain unknown?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "beak-construction-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "beak-condition-and-change", "name": "Beak condition and change", "description": "Assess visible integrity and changes relative to a suitable baseline.", "rationale": "Wear, growth, damage and normal variation can produce similar appearances but imply different responses.", "layers": [ { "id": "integrity-and-alignment", "name": "Integrity and alignment", "description": "Locate defects and deviations without diagnosing from appearance alone.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-map", "name": "Condition map", "description": "Record affected tips, edges, surfaces and attachment regions with evidence and visibility limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where are cracks, chips, missing material, deformation or surface changes visible, and what is their observable extent?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "condition-map-q01" }, { "text": "What reference supports treating the observed tip relationship or surface appearance as expected variation or a possible abnormality?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "condition-map-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "growth-wear-and-history", "name": "Growth, wear and history", "description": "Track changes while preserving uncertainty about their cause.", "findings": [ { "id": "longitudinal-beak-change", "name": "Longitudinal beak change", "description": "Compare dated observations and distinguish documented events from inferred mechanisms.", "questions": [ { "text": "How have beak dimensions, edge profiles and alignment changed between comparable dated observations?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "longitudinal-beak-change-q01" }, { "text": "What documented growth, wear exposure, injury or intervention could explain the change, and which explanations remain unverified?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "longitudinal-beak-change-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "beak-use-and-intervention", "name": "Beak use and intervention", "description": "Connect demonstrated beak use to decisions about observation, contact and modification.", "rationale": "A beak's appearance does not by itself establish function or justify an intervention.", "layers": [ { "id": "opening-and-task-performance", "name": "Opening and task performance", "description": "Record movement and task outcomes in the bearer's ordinary context.", "findings": [ { "id": "demonstrated-beak-function", "name": "Demonstrated beak function", "description": "Capture observed opening, closure and use without assigning function solely from shape.", "questions": [ { "text": "During which observed activities does the bearer use the beak, and what shows successful contact, grasping or processing?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "demonstrated-beak-function-q01" }, { "text": "What opening, closing or contact difficulties are visible, and under what task and observation conditions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "demonstrated-beak-function-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "contact-and-modification-decisions", "name": "Contact and modification decisions", "description": "Determine prerequisites for actions affecting the beak or its specimen value.", "findings": [ { "id": "beak-action-prerequisites", "name": "Beak action prerequisites", "description": "Link a proposed action to attachment, tissue knowledge, functional evidence and appropriate expertise.", "questions": [ { "text": "Given attachment status and known tissue boundaries, which observations can proceed without forcing the beak open or altering its working surfaces?", "kind": "action", "id": "beak-action-prerequisites-q01" }, { "text": "What qualified assessment, authorization and bearer-specific or specimen-specific protocol are required before restraint, trimming, repair, sampling or preservation?", "kind": "action", "id": "beak-action-prerequisites-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "avian rhamphotheca (upper and lower mandibles)", "tomial-toothed / serrated beak", "hooked raptorial beak", "filter-feeding lamellate beak", "probing / needle beak", "crushing granivorous beak", "cephalopod beak (chitinous jaws)", "chelonian rhamphotheca" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of beak this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend 'beak' to include all biological structures conventionally given that name, or a narrower anatomical group?", "Should the canonical beak instance include its supporting jaw structures, or treat them as related parts whose boundaries vary by bearer?", "Which anatomical sources and measurement conventions should govern each included bearer group?", "What reference evidence distinguishes expected shape, growth and wear from impaired condition across life stages and bearer groups?", "Which validated assessment and intervention protocols apply to each included beak type and attachment context?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 9, "questions": 17 } }