{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:53:59Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00204102, "turns": 1, "seconds": 22.4, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 92.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c5b-3627-7050-85df-ad9a7678250c\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: African bush elephant\nRegistry id: vr.tr.african-bush-elephant\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into t" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T11:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:03:13+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:30+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q36557", "registryId": "vr.tr.african-bush-elephant", "name": "African bush elephant", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.LIV" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q36557/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.african-bush-elephant", "name": "African bush elephant", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise an African bush elephant, assess its condition and relationships, and determine appropriate observation, protection or authorised intervention.", "definition": "The African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) is the largest living terrestrial mammal, a savanna-and-woodland specialist of sub-Saharan Africa distinguished from the forest elephant by larger body size, more triangular ears, and less densely packed, more curved tusks.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the species-specific recognition criteria, individual states, ecological dependencies and action constraints of African bush elephants (Loxodonta africana) under registry entry vr.tr.african-bush-elephant in PHY / PHY.LIV, with links to population, habitat and management models.", "in_scope": [ "Species attribution and persistent identification of individual elephants.", "Age, sex, physical condition and functional ability.", "Reproductive state, calf dependence and social relationships.", "Movement, seasonal resource access and observed ecological interactions.", "Individual exposure to threats and evidence needed to justify intervention." ], "out_of_scope": [ "African forest elephant and Asian elephant models, except comparative recognition criteria.", "Population census methods, demographic forecasts and species-wide conservation assessments.", "Complete ecosystem, watershed and protected-area models.", "Veterinary treatment protocols, drug dosing and capture procedures.", "Ivory products, trade transactions and wildlife-crime investigations.", "Organisational management plans and jurisdiction-wide legal rules." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Compare ear outline and tusk orientation with African forest elephant: forest elephants generally have more rounded ears and straighter, downward-directed tusks; record multiple visible traits and retain uncertainty when views are poor. [African forest elephant account](https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Loxodonta_cyclotis/)", "Inspect the trunk tip: two finger-like projections support African elephant rather than Asian elephant attribution, but do not distinguish bush from forest elephant. [African bush elephant account](https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Loxodonta_africana/)", "Compare shoulder height and overall build only against age- and sex-appropriate references: larger adult size supports bush rather than forest elephant attribution but is insufficient alone. [African bush elephant account](https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Loxodonta_africana/)", "Check whether the identification explicitly resolves Loxodonta africana rather than using an older, inclusive African-elephant label; the registry entry excludes Loxodonta cyclotis. [Mammal Diversity Database](https://www.mammaldiversity.org/taxon/1000522/)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Species attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Loxodonta africana supported; African elephant unresolved; possible mixed ancestry; alternative species supported", "why_it_matters": "Prevents ambiguous observations and historical names from becoming confident bush-elephant records." }, { "name": "Individual recognition evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to dated ear-pattern, tusk, scar, photographic, tag or genetic evidence", "why_it_matters": "Supports longitudinal assessment without treating similar-looking elephants as the same individual." }, { "name": "Estimated age", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Years or age interval, with estimation method and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Provides context for size, independence, reproduction and physical wear." }, { "name": "Sex assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Female; male; undetermined, with supporting observation", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation of development and reproductive observations without inferring sex from tusks alone." }, { "name": "Shoulder height", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Metres, with measurement or estimation method", "why_it_matters": "Supports growth assessment and size comparison when age, sex and perspective are accounted for." }, { "name": "Body condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Named elephant condition score, score value, assessment date and visibility limitations", "why_it_matters": "Makes changes in condition interpretable without inventing a universal healthy-weight threshold." }, { "name": "Trunk, tusk and locomotor function", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "For each function: no impairment observed; impaired; unassessed, with evidence", "why_it_matters": "Connects visible damage to feeding, drinking and movement capability." }, { "name": "Reproductive condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Pregnancy, lactation or musth assessment, each dated and marked observed, suspected, confirmed or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation of physiological state and planning of encounters or interventions." }, { "name": "Calf and social dependencies", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated links to dependent calves, mother, family associates or bull associates, with relationship confidence", "why_it_matters": "Reveals who could be affected by separation, loss or relocation of an individual." }, { "name": "Resource access", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Water, forage and shade access: available; constrained; unavailable; unknown, with season and location", "why_it_matters": "Relates condition and movement to the resources actually reachable by the elephant." }, { "name": "Movement and passage", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Time-stamped locations, movement segments and links to crossings, barriers or corridors", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of interrupted routes and exposure at roads, fences or settlements." }, { "name": "Human encounter state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Observed behaviour, separation distance in metres, calf presence, escape routes and incident context", "why_it_matters": "Supports encounter-specific decisions without labelling an elephant permanently aggressive." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify or re-identify an elephant through non-invasive observation while retaining uncertainty.", "Track changes in body condition, functional ability and calf dependence across sightings.", "Relate movement to water, forage and barriers to inform habitat-access protection.", "Assess encounter conditions and recommend space, withdrawal or trained responder involvement.", "Flag suspected injury, entrapment or calf separation for qualified assessment.", "Evaluate whether monitoring, sampling or relocation proposals have sufficient evidence, authority and safeguards for the elephant and its associates." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Monitor elephant movements and health for authorized conservation bodies.", "Warn communities and visitors about elephants nearby." ], "must_not": [ "Share elephant locations in ways that help poachers.", "Approach, chase, feed or harass wild elephants.", "Assist in trading ivory or elephant parts outside the law.", "Promote riding or captive shows that harm elephants." ], "requires_human": [ "Responding to elephants raiding crops or entering villages.", "Moving, darting or culling an elephant." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Poaching and habitat loss have cut elephant numbers sharply.", "Farmers living near elephants lose crops and sometimes lives." ], "affected_parties": [ "Elephants", "Rural communities near elephants", "Rangers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody: wild and protected by law; wildlife authorities manage populations.", "master_systems": [ "Species and conservation databases", "Ivory stockpile registers" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Very large grey animal with huge fan-shaped ears and tusks in both sexes.", "Saddle-backed outline and two finger-like tips on the trunk." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Charges and trampling when elephants are disturbed.", "Crop raiding and conflict with farmers." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, CITES Secretariat." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "African bush elephants inhabit savannas, woodlands and other suitable landscapes across parts of sub-Saharan Africa.", "They are encountered in wildlife observation, conservation research, protected area management and interactions between people and wildlife.", "Their feeding, movement and seed dispersal influence vegetation and habitats, making them important subjects of ecosystem monitoring." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "pending", "title": "pending", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "" }, { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q36557: African bush elephant", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q36557", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: African bush elephant", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_bush_elephant", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "recognition-and-identity", "name": "Recognition and identity", "description": "Establish species attribution and continuity of individual identity.", "rationale": "Confusion with forest elephants and misidentification between individuals can invalidate every later assessment.", "layers": [ { "id": "species-boundary", "name": "Species boundary", "description": "Resolve the registered taxon using explicit evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "bush-elephant-attribution", "name": "Bush elephant attribution", "description": "Record the combination of anatomical, locality and specialist evidence supporting attribution, including contradictory observations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which visible ear, tusk, trunk-tip and body traits support bush elephant attribution, and which alternatives remain plausible?", "kind": "definition", "id": "bush-elephant-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Does the supporting record use Loxodonta africana in its current species sense or as an older inclusive African-elephant name?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "bush-elephant-attribution-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence would require leaving this elephant unresolved rather than assigning it to this registry entry?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bush-elephant-attribution-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "individual-continuity", "name": "Individual continuity", "description": "Connect sightings without confusing identity with temporary appearance.", "findings": [ { "id": "ear-tusk-and-scar-matching", "name": "Ear, tusk and scar matching", "description": "Maintain dated recognition evidence that accommodates changing tusks, wounds and visibility.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which ear notches, venation patterns, tusk asymmetries or scars distinguish this elephant in the available photographs?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "ear-tusk-and-scar-matching-q01" }, { "text": "Who matched the sightings, using which images or identifiers, and with what confidence?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "ear-tusk-and-scar-matching-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "body-condition-and-function", "name": "Body condition and function", "description": "Assess development, condition and the ability to perform essential activities.", "rationale": "An elephant's size alone cannot establish its health or ability to feed, drink and travel.", "layers": [ { "id": "development-and-condition", "name": "Development and condition", "description": "Interpret body measurements in the context of age, sex and observation method.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-relative-to-life-stage", "name": "Condition relative to life stage", "description": "Record estimated age, sex, shoulder height and repeatable body-condition observations with uncertainty.", "questions": [ { "text": "How were age, sex and shoulder height assessed, and what uncertainty follows from distance or partial visibility?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "condition-relative-to-life-stage-q01" }, { "text": "Has condition changed under the same elephant-specific scoring method, accounting for season and reproductive state?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "condition-relative-to-life-stage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "feeding-drinking-and-mobility", "name": "Feeding, drinking and mobility", "description": "Link anatomical observations to demonstrated function.", "findings": [ { "id": "essential-function-impairment", "name": "Essential function impairment", "description": "Distinguish observed difficulty using the trunk, processing food or walking from damage that has no demonstrated functional effect.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can the elephant grasp forage, transfer water, chew and bear weight normally in the observed setting?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "essential-function-impairment-q01" }, { "text": "Which signs warrant qualified assessment, and what remains unseen rather than demonstrably normal?", "kind": "action", "id": "essential-function-impairment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "social-and-reproductive-dependencies", "name": "Social and reproductive dependencies", "description": "Represent relationships and reproductive states that affect the elephant and its associates.", "rationale": "An action directed at one elephant may disrupt calf care or established social relationships.", "layers": [ { "id": "family-and-association", "name": "Family and association", "description": "Separate repeated social relationships from momentary proximity.", "findings": [ { "id": "dependent-calves-and-associates", "name": "Dependent calves and associates", "description": "Record nursing, care, repeated association and separation evidence without assuming that the nearest adult is the mother.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observations establish nursing or care dependence between a calf and a particular adult?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dependent-calves-and-associates-q01" }, { "text": "Which associates could be affected if this elephant were absent, isolated or moved?", "kind": "action", "id": "dependent-calves-and-associates-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reproductive-state", "name": "Reproductive state", "description": "Record dated reproductive assessments and their evidential limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "pregnancy-lactation-and-musth", "name": "Pregnancy, lactation and musth", "description": "Keep observed signs separate from confirmed physiological states and encounter-specific behavioural judgments.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observations or examinations support pregnancy, lactation or musth, and when were they made?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "pregnancy-lactation-and-musth-q01" }, { "text": "How should the assessed state affect observation or intervention planning without treating it as proof of aggression?", "kind": "action", "id": "pregnancy-lactation-and-musth-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "seasonal-range-and-resource-use", "name": "Seasonal range and resource use", "description": "Connect elephant movement and activity to accessible resources and landscape constraints.", "rationale": "Condition and movement need interpretation against seasonal water, forage and passage availability.", "layers": [ { "id": "water-and-forage-access", "name": "Water and forage access", "description": "Record resources used and whether the elephant can reach them.", "findings": [ { "id": "seasonal-resource-dependence", "name": "Seasonal resource dependence", "description": "Connect observed drinking and feeding to dated resource conditions rather than fixed species-wide requirements.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which water sources and forage patches has this elephant actually used during the recorded season?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "seasonal-resource-dependence-q01" }, { "text": "Is reduced use explained by resource depletion, blocked access, disturbance or insufficient observation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "seasonal-resource-dependence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "passage-and-landscape-effects", "name": "Passage and landscape effects", "description": "Represent movement constraints and directly evidenced interactions with vegetation.", "findings": [ { "id": "routes-barriers-and-foraging-effects", "name": "Routes, barriers and foraging effects", "description": "Link the elephant to observed crossings, blocked routes and feeding effects while leaving ecosystem-wide conclusions to neighbouring models.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which movement records show successful passage, repeated detours or obstruction at roads and fences?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "routes-barriers-and-foraging-effects-q01" }, { "text": "Which browsing, bark stripping or tree-pushing events were directly attributed to this elephant, and which remain unattributed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "routes-barriers-and-foraging-effects-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "threats-and-permitted-intervention", "name": "Threats and permitted intervention", "description": "Translate observed threats and encounter conditions into justified, authorised responses.", "rationale": "Poaching and habitat loss are established species-level threats, but action requires local evidence and authority. [IUCN African elephant assessment announcement](https://iucn.org/news/species/202103/african-elephant-species-now-endangered-and-critically-endangered-iucn-red-list)", "layers": [ { "id": "encounter-and-threat-assessment", "name": "Encounter and threat assessment", "description": "Assess a particular event without assigning permanent behavioural labels.", "findings": [ { "id": "contextual-encounter-risk", "name": "Contextual encounter risk", "description": "Record elephant behaviour, nearby people, calves, barriers and retreat options alongside evidence of injury or disturbance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What was observed before and during the encounter, including distances, calf positions, elephant movement and available escape routes?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "contextual-encounter-risk-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence support creating space, withdrawing, monitoring remotely or contacting trained responders?", "kind": "action", "id": "contextual-encounter-risk-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "intervention-justification", "name": "Intervention justification", "description": "Connect proposed actions to purpose, authority, welfare dependencies and follow-up.", "findings": [ { "id": "authorised-elephant-intervention", "name": "Authorised elephant intervention", "description": "Record why monitoring, sampling, capture or relocation is proposed and link to current permissions and qualified operational protocols.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which current jurisdiction, permissions and responsible specialists govern the proposed action on this elephant?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authorised-elephant-intervention-q01" }, { "text": "How does the proposal address calf dependence, social separation, reproductive condition and post-action monitoring?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorised-elephant-intervention-q02" }, { "text": "What missing evidence or adverse condition requires deferring or stopping the action?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "authorised-elephant-intervention-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Loxodonta africana africana (southern African bush elephant)", "Loxodonta africana knochenhaueri (East African bush elephant)", "Loxodonta africana oxyotis (East African form, historically used)", "captive/zoo-managed African bush elephant" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of African bush elephant this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which diagnostic evidence and escalation criteria reliably distinguish bush elephants, forest elephants and possible hybrids where appearance or historical records are ambiguous?", "Which age-estimation and body-condition methods are validated across the populations, sexes and life stages this model will cover?", "What duration and quality of observation are sufficient to infer calf independence, persistent social association or meaningful separation?", "Which local seasonal baselines distinguish ordinary movement and resource variation from water stress, nutritional decline or disrupted passage?", "Which jurisdiction-specific authorities, encounter criteria and intervention protocols should be linked for each deployment, and how will their currency be checked?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 11, "questions": 23 } }