{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:47:40Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09502-c4e5-7793-a375-123442501967\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fokker A.I\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regi", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 78.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09502-c4f5-7051-9455-e7de2b8960e4\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fokker A.I\nRegistry id: vr.tr.fokker-a-i\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:54:05+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:30+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q3747025", "registryId": "vr.tr.fokker-a-i", "name": "Fokker A.I", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q3747025/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.fokker-a-i", "name": "Fokker A.I", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the Fokker A.I aircraft type, distinguish documented configurations, and assess what evidence is needed before interpreting, conserving or operating a represented aircraft.", "definition": "The Fokker A.I was an unarmed, two-seat, single-engine reconnaissance monoplane developed from the Fokker M.5 design and used by German military aviation during the early First World War.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the type-level identity and configuration boundaries of Fokker A.I, registry entry vr.tr.fokker-a-i in PHY / PHY.OBJ, including its relationship to the manufacturer designation M.8; individual aircraft supply evidence without becoming separate type definitions.", "in_scope": [ "Military and manufacturer designation correspondence", "Recognition features and differences from neighbouring Fokker monoplanes", "Airframe, propulsion and flight-control configurations", "Reconnaissance and training equipment and crew arrangements", "Configuration-dependent performance and loading evidence", "Type-specific conservation and operational assessment requirements" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete histories and maintenance logs of individual airframes", "The Fokker company and its entire aircraft catalogue", "Independent models of Oberursel engines and their internal components", "General aviation mechanics and pilot training", "First World War campaigns and reconnaissance doctrine", "Replicas treated as original production aircraft" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require evidence connecting the A.I designation to M.8; an A.I inscription without manufacturer or service context is insufficient.", "Check the documented two-seat shoulder-wing configuration against photographs and drawings rather than identifying every early Fokker monoplane as A.I.", "Inspect the observation opening between wing and fuselage as a supporting recognition feature. [Fokker History M.8](https://www.fokker-history.com/en-gb/m-8)", "Distinguish a reconnaissance configuration from an armed Eindecker by airframe identity and equipment evidence; a visible weapon alone does not establish a different type.", "Resolve Fokker-built and Halberstadt-associated records through builder and designation evidence rather than treating their similar names as automatic synonyms." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Designation correspondence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Registry identity ↔ manufacturer designation ↔ service designation, qualified by issuer and date", "why_it_matters": "Prevents confusion between M.8, A.I and similarly designated aircraft from other manufacturers." }, { "name": "Crew and seating arrangement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Seat count, seat positions, occupant roles and installed controls", "why_it_matters": "Supports recognition and separates reconnaissance accommodation from claimed training adaptations." }, { "name": "Observation geometry", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Wing position, fuselage openings and documented downward sightlines", "why_it_matters": "Connects the aircraft's configuration to its observation function." }, { "name": "Installed powerplant", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Engine designation, cylinder count, rotary architecture, propeller and installation evidence", "why_it_matters": "Prevents specifications from another Fokker monoplane or a later replica being transferred to A.I." }, { "name": "Engine power", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kW with original hp or PS notation, rating conditions and source retained", "why_it_matters": "Published engine claims require both configuration attribution and careful unit interpretation." }, { "name": "Airframe dimensions and loading", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Span and length in m; wing area in m²; empty and loaded mass in kg", "why_it_matters": "Enables comparison only when the measured configuration and mass definitions are known." }, { "name": "Documented performance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Speed in km/h, endurance in h and altitude in m, with load and test conditions", "why_it_matters": "Separates historical performance claims from usable operating limits." }, { "name": "Representation and assessment state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documentary record, original material, restored aircraft or replica; condition and operating authorization separately recorded", "why_it_matters": "An accurate appearance does not establish historical authenticity or fitness for flight." } ], "affordances": [ "Match an aircraft record or photograph to A.I using designation and configuration evidence.", "Compare a claimed A.I configuration with documented M.8 features.", "Identify performance figures imported from a neighbouring aircraft or incompatible engine installation.", "Assess whether an interpretation of reconnaissance, training or weapon carriage is supported.", "Specify evidence and inspections needed for conservation, display or an operational assessment." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify photographs or remains as this early reconnaissance monoplane.", "Describe its development from an earlier design and its early wartime use from historical sources." ], "must_not": [ "Present related designs as the same type without evidence.", "Invent service details where records are thin.", "Misuse its history to glorify war." ], "requires_human": [ "Attributing artefacts or remains to this type." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Early military aviation was dangerous for its crews; history should respect them.", "Accurate attribution protects the historical record." ], "affected_parties": [ "Historians and museums", "Descendants of aircrew" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The museum or owner of any surviving example or remains; the state for items in public collections.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Single-engine monoplane with a shoulder or mid wing and wire bracing.", "Two open seats and no armament.", "Early First World War markings in photographs." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Wing-warping control and fragile structure limited safety.", "Unarmed reconnaissance left crews exposed." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "This aircraft type is encountered in studies of early First World War military reconnaissance and the development of aviation.", "Archival photographs, technical records and scale representations support identification and comparison with related contemporary monoplanes.", "Historical documentation informs interpretation and any reconstruction or conservation work." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No specific applicable standard, law or official classification is established here for the historical aircraft model without a jurisdiction, surviving airframe or intended activity." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q3747025: Fokker A.I", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3747025", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Fokker A.I", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_A.I", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-production-boundaries", "name": "Identity and production boundaries", "description": "Establish what counts as Fokker A.I and how alternate labels relate to this registry entry.", "rationale": "Early aircraft designations can overlap across manufacturers, services and retrospective accounts.", "layers": [ { "id": "designation-mapping", "name": "Designation mapping", "description": "Connect registry, manufacturer and military names through attributable records.", "findings": [ { "id": "ai-m8-correspondence", "name": "A.I and M.8 correspondence", "description": "The historical overview associates M.8 with A-1; exact designation spelling and official application require record-level verification. [Fokker History M.8](https://www.fokker-history.com/en-gb/m-8)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which manufacturer or military documents explicitly connect Fokker A.I with M.8?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "ai-m8-correspondence-q01" }, { "text": "Which A.I, A-I and A-1 spellings are official designations, and which are editorial normalizations?", "kind": "definition", "id": "ai-m8-correspondence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "builder-and-neighbour-boundaries", "name": "Builder and neighbour boundaries", "description": "Separate licensed production, related designs and individual examples.", "findings": [ { "id": "licensed-and-related-airframes", "name": "Licensed and related airframes", "description": "Record claimed licensed production and design relationships without assuming that every related designation is interchangeable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What records establish the relationship between Halberstadt A.I production and Fokker M.8?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "licensed-and-related-airframes-q01" }, { "text": "Which documented structural changes distinguish A.I from M.5-derived neighbours and subsequent A-series aircraft?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "licensed-and-related-airframes-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "airframe-and-observation", "name": "Airframe and observation", "description": "Describe recognition geometry, crew accommodation and the configuration needed for ground observation.", "rationale": "The A.I's observation role must be connected to physical arrangements rather than inferred from its classification alone.", "layers": [ { "id": "recognition-geometry", "name": "Recognition geometry", "description": "Capture the external features that support or contradict identification.", "findings": [ { "id": "wing-and-fuselage-evidence", "name": "Wing and fuselage evidence", "description": "Treat wing placement, observation openings, bracing, tail outline and undercarriage as a combined identification test.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dated drawings or identified photographs establish the A.I wing, tail and undercarriage geometry?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "wing-and-fuselage-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What span, length and wing area belong to each documented configuration?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "wing-and-fuselage-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "crew-and-mission-fit", "name": "Crew and mission fit", "description": "Relate seating and installed equipment to observation and other documented uses.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-and-training-arrangements", "name": "Observation and training arrangements", "description": "Distinguish crew accommodation, sightlines, training controls and carried equipment from unsupported role labels.", "questions": [ { "text": "How were pilot and observer positioned, and what evidence establishes their downward visibility?", "kind": "definition", "id": "observation-and-training-arrangements-q01" }, { "text": "Which training controls, cameras, communication devices or carried weapons are documented for identified A.I examples?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observation-and-training-arrangements-q02" }, { "text": "When does an equipment change remain an A.I configuration rather than justify a separate type relationship?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "observation-and-training-arrangements-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "propulsion-controls-and-performance", "name": "Propulsion, controls and performance", "description": "Bind propulsion and handling claims to the configuration that produced them.", "rationale": "Similar early Fokker airframes invite accidental transfer of engine ratings, control arrangements and performance figures.", "layers": [ { "id": "engine-and-control-installation", "name": "Engine and control installation", "description": "Identify the installed engine and the mechanisms through which the pilot controls the aircraft.", "findings": [ { "id": "rotary-installation-and-control-paths", "name": "Rotary installation and control paths", "description": "The overview identifies a seven-cylinder Oberursel rotary installation; fuel, lubrication, ignition and flight-control details need installation-specific evidence. [Fokker History M.8](https://www.fokker-history.com/en-gb/m-8)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which engine and propeller combinations are documented, and what original units accompany their power ratings?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "rotary-installation-and-control-paths-q01" }, { "text": "Do A.I drawings establish wing warping or another lateral-control mechanism, and how are the pitch and yaw controls connected?", "kind": "definition", "id": "rotary-installation-and-control-paths-q02" }, { "text": "Which fuel, oil and ignition controls or safeguards are actually documented for the installation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "rotary-installation-and-control-paths-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "loading-and-performance-evidence", "name": "Loading and performance evidence", "description": "Keep measured results, estimates and operating limits distinct.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-qualified-envelope", "name": "Configuration-qualified envelope", "description": "Associate each mass, speed, endurance and climb claim with engine, crew, fuel load and evidence quality.", "questions": [ { "text": "What empty mass, loaded mass and fuel capacity are supported, and how did the source define them?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "configuration-qualified-envelope-q01" }, { "text": "Which speed, endurance or climb figures derive from tests rather than later compilations?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-qualified-envelope-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence would be required before using a historical performance figure in an assessment of a surviving aircraft or replica?", "kind": "action", "id": "configuration-qualified-envelope-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "material-condition-and-permitted-use", "name": "Material condition and permitted use", "description": "Connect A.I-specific construction evidence to conservation and possible operation.", "rationale": "A historical type description cannot establish the structural integrity, authenticity or operating eligibility of a present-day representation.", "layers": [ { "id": "construction-and-deterioration", "name": "Construction and deterioration", "description": "Establish original materials and assembly methods before assessing repairs or degradation.", "findings": [ { "id": "airframe-and-engine-inspection-basis", "name": "Airframe and engine inspection basis", "description": "Determine which structural joints, covering, bracing, control components and rotary-engine systems require assessment using verified construction evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original drawings or examinations establish materials and joining methods in the A.I fuselage, wings and tail?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "airframe-and-engine-inspection-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What deterioration and repair evidence must be checked in the documented structure, bracing and control system before moving or displaying an example?", "kind": "action", "id": "airframe-and-engine-inspection-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "authenticity-and-use-decisions", "name": "Authenticity and use decisions", "description": "Separate historical fidelity, mechanical condition and authorization for a proposed activity.", "findings": [ { "id": "original-restoration-and-replica-status", "name": "Original, restoration and replica status", "description": "Identify substitutions and reconstruction evidence, then assess display, engine running or flight against the actual aircraft and applicable requirements.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which parts and dimensions are original, reconstructed from evidence or modern substitutions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "original-restoration-and-replica-status-q01" }, { "text": "What technical assessment and jurisdiction-specific authorization apply to the proposed display, engine run or flight?", "kind": "action", "id": "original-restoration-and-replica-status-q02" }, { "text": "Which historical acceptance requirements can be documented without presenting them as current certification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "original-restoration-and-replica-status-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This is a recall-based description; no sources were consulted.", "Check the precise correspondence among M.5L, military designations and individual production configurations before assigning specifications.", "Dimensions, engine ratings, production totals and service dates are omitted because they require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Fokker A.I this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "German military aircraft type designation", "value_or_pattern": "Fokker A.I", "note": "The A category denoted unarmed monoplanes; the Roman numeral distinguished the manufacturer's type within that category." }, { "scheme": "Fokker manufacturer designation", "value_or_pattern": "M.5L", "note": "Associated with the long-span version of the M.5 design adopted as the A.I." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Fokker A.I this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Military aerial reconnaissance during the early First World War.", "Observation flights carrying a pilot and an observer." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Fokker A.I this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Engine failure could force an emergency landing.", "Damage to external wing-bracing wires could compromise structural integrity.", "Failure or maladjustment of the wing-warping controls could impair lateral control.", "Its unarmed configuration left it vulnerable to armed enemy aircraft." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Fokker A.I this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Fokker M.5", "difference": "The M.5 is the underlying manufacturer design family; A.I identifies the military type associated with its long-span version." }, { "name": "Fokker E.I", "difference": "The E.I was a single-seat armed fighter with a synchronized machine gun; the A.I was an unarmed two-seat reconnaissance aircraft." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Fokker A.I this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "What primary documentation fixes the A.I/M.8 designation boundary and the precise relationship to Halberstadt A.I production?", "Which engine ratings and installations are authentic, and do conflicting published figures reflect variants, unit conventions or errors?", "What original drawings establish the lateral-control mechanism, structural materials, dimensions and loading limits?", "Which reconnaissance, training and weapon-carriage configurations are documented modifications rather than retrospective descriptions?", "Do any original airframes or substantial components survive, and what evidence distinguishes them from reconstructions and replicas?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 25 } }