{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:54:31Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 18.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09576-ec41-7841-abfa-0ab631597eb0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Paris Peace Conference\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 04", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 77.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09576-ec46-7861-993c-ff33f46d1a66\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Paris Peace Conference\nRegistry id: vr.tr.paris-peace-conference\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:43:47+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:32:17+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "definition", "distinguishing_features", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "in_scope", "out_of_scope", "owners", "purpose", "scope_statement", "visual_identification" ], "answering_review": "d1d7cd4aecb0dc2827515ae46b1258a5b4c45755e04d1a1e4719e455f9eb14c3" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q404405", "registryId": "vr.tr.paris-peace-conference", "name": "Paris Peace Conference", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q404405/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.paris-peace-conference", "name": "Paris Peace Conference", "purpose": "Enable an agent to resolve the ambiguous title Paris Peace Conference to the intended subject without treating the disambiguation page as a historical event.", "definition": "A Wikimedia disambiguation page that distinguishes subjects called Paris Peace Conference and directs readers to the corresponding articles.", "scope_statement": "This model covers the Wikimedia disambiguation page titled Paris Peace Conference, its ambiguous title, listed referents and navigation links; the historical conferences are separate subjects.", "in_scope": [ "The page's identity and status as a Wikimedia disambiguation page are in scope.", "The ambiguous title and the subjects listed under it are in scope.", "Labels, descriptive qualifiers and links used to distinguish listed subjects are in scope.", "Uncertainty about which listed subject a user intends is in scope." ], "out_of_scope": [ "The proceedings, participants and outcomes of individual historical conferences belong to their respective subject models.", "Individual treaties and their legal interpretation are outside this page model.", "The subsequent operation of institutions created by peace settlements is outside this page model.", "Complete histories of affected states, territories and communities are outside this page model.", "Participants' biographies and political careers are outside this page model." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify the referent as a disambiguation page rather than a historical conference.", "Use the page's listed subjects and descriptive qualifiers to distinguish possible referents.", "Treat a link to a conference article as a navigation target rather than evidence that the page itself represents that conference.", "Do not resolve the title to a particular conference without supporting context." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Registry referent certainty", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "provisional identification | source-confirmed identification | ambiguous", "why_it_matters": "The registry supplies no definition, so the familiar 1919 identification must remain explicit and revisable." }, { "name": "Conference temporal extent", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Calendar dates with source, precision and inclusion rule", "why_it_matters": "Different boundaries can include continuing negotiations or successor machinery and produce different accounts of what the conference accomplished." }, { "name": "Proceeding authority", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Plenary | restricted council | commission | informal consultation | other documented body", "why_it_matters": "An expert recommendation and a decision by a principal negotiating body carry different evidential weight." }, { "name": "Representation relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Person or delegation → claimed constituency → credentials → recognized role, dated", "why_it_matters": "Speaking about a population does not establish authorization to represent it." }, { "name": "Access to negotiation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Decision participant | consulted | heard by commission | petition submitted | excluded | unestablished, by issue and date", "why_it_matters": "Conference influence cannot be inferred from a single attendance list." }, { "name": "Settlement proposal stage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Submitted | discussed | amended | recommended | agreed | rejected | deferred | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a proposal or negotiating demand from being presented as an adopted peace term." }, { "name": "Territorial claim basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Self-determination | historical title | security | economic access | prior agreement | imperial interest | mixed or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Makes competing justifications comparable without assuming that one principle governed every settlement." }, { "name": "Outcome attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Conference proceeding → decision or recommendation → treaty provision or successor process", "why_it_matters": "Separates what negotiators decided from what later institutions implemented or changed." } ], "affordances": [ "Disambiguate a document's reference to the Paris Peace Conference using date, participants and settlement context.", "Reconstruct an issue's path through petitions, commissions, restricted negotiations and treaty drafting.", "Compare delegations' stated objectives with the provisions they accepted, opposed or left unresolved.", "Identify populations whose interests were discussed and assess the evidence for their representation.", "Link a claimed conference outcome to its proceeding and documentary basis.", "Flag unsupported claims of consensus, implementation or long-term causation." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain that Paris Peace Conference is an ambiguous title.", "Present listed subjects with their available descriptive qualifiers.", "Resolve a reference when the user's context clearly identifies a listed subject." ], "must_not": [ "Treat the disambiguation page as the 1919-1920 conference or any other individual event.", "Merge facts from different linked conferences.", "Invent listed subjects, links or historical evidence.", "Present one national narrative as the only view when describing a linked historical subject.", "Use a linked conference to justify present-day territorial claims or hostility." ], "requires_human": [ "A human must clarify the intended subject when available context cannot resolve the ambiguity." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Accurate disambiguation prevents the misattribution of contested historical claims.", "Descriptions of linked subjects should avoid privileging one national narrative or erasing affected communities." ], "affected_parties": [ "Readers and students depend on accurate navigation.", "Editors and downstream knowledge users depend on distinct subject identities.", "Communities represented in linked historical subjects can be harmed by misattribution." ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The volunteer editors maintaining the disambiguation page.", "master_systems": [ "The relevant Wikimedia project's page record and revision history document the disambiguation page." ] }, "visual_identification": [ "The page presents a title and links to distinct subjects sharing that title.", "A disambiguation notice or page classification can support identification of its navigational role.", "Photographs of delegates and treaty documents identify linked historical subjects rather than the disambiguation page itself." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Treating the page as a historical event assigns facts to the wrong entity.", "Selecting a conference without sufficient context can misdirect readers and downstream agents.", "Combining facts from distinct conferences can produce misleading historical accounts." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "In the supplied disambiguation-page sense, this title helps readers distinguish historical conferences that share the name Paris Peace Conference.", "It supports selecting the intended event before researching its participants, negotiations and settlements.", "The accompanying definition describes the conference following the First World War, which must be distinguished from other events bearing the same title." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "A disambiguation page has no intrinsic applicable technical standard or regulatory classification, and treaties associated with a listed conference do not govern the page itself." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q404405: Paris Peace Conference", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q404405", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Paris Peace Conference", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Peace_Conference", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "conference-identity-and-extent", "name": "Conference identity and extent", "description": "Establish which Paris conference the registry means and what proceedings belong to it.", "rationale": "An undefined registry label must not silently merge different peace conferences or absorb the entire postwar settlement.", "layers": [ { "id": "referent-identification", "name": "Referent identification", "description": "Anchor the entry to a documented historical diplomatic event.", "findings": [ { "id": "postwar-conference-referent", "name": "Postwar conference referent", "description": "Record evidence supporting the provisional 1919 identification and identifiers that distinguish similarly named events.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which originating registry or Wikidata record establishes that this entry denotes the conference following the First World War?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "postwar-conference-referent-q01" }, { "text": "Which dates, participating powers and treaty references distinguish this referent from the 1946 Paris Peace Conference?", "kind": "definition", "id": "postwar-conference-referent-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "proceedings-boundary", "name": "Proceedings boundary", "description": "Determine the temporal and organizational limits of the conference.", "findings": [ { "id": "opening-continuation-and-closure", "name": "Opening, continuation and closure", "description": "Distinguish the opening, principal negotiations, continuing bodies and successor arrangements without choosing an unsupported terminal date.", "questions": [ { "text": "What closing date does each source use, and which institutional event justifies it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "opening-continuation-and-closure-q01" }, { "text": "Which later meetings and treaty negotiations count as conference proceedings rather than successor diplomacy?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "opening-continuation-and-closure-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "representation-and-decision-power", "name": "Representation and decision power", "description": "Record who could speak, submit claims, negotiate and authorize outcomes.", "rationale": "The settlement cannot be understood by treating every delegation or affected population as an equal participant.", "layers": [ { "id": "delegations-and-claimants", "name": "Delegations and claimants", "description": "Distinguish recognized delegations from petitioners and other claimants.", "findings": [ { "id": "credentials-and-access", "name": "Credentials and access", "description": "Track credentials, claimed constituencies and access for states, emerging national movements and colonial petitioners.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who authorized each delegation or petitioner to speak, and how did the conference recognize that claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "credentials-and-access-q01" }, { "text": "For a given issue, were defeated powers and affected populations present, consulted, heard indirectly or excluded?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "credentials-and-access-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "negotiating-bodies", "name": "Negotiating bodies", "description": "Locate authority in plenaries, principal councils and specialist commissions.", "findings": [ { "id": "recommendation-versus-decision", "name": "Recommendation versus decision", "description": "Trace how an issue moved among bodies, including the Councils of Ten and Four where documented, and identify who could settle it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which body considered, recommended and finally approved the position under examination?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "recommendation-versus-decision-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence permits an agent to describe that position as a conference decision rather than a delegation's demand?", "kind": "action", "id": "recommendation-versus-decision-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "territory-peoples-and-empire", "name": "Territory, peoples and empire", "description": "Model the handling of borders, national claims, minorities and former imperial possessions.", "rationale": "Territorial decisions require comparison of rival claims and evidence, including the limits of consultation and self-determination.", "layers": [ { "id": "border-claims", "name": "Border claims", "description": "Connect proposed boundaries to their justifications and supporting material.", "findings": [ { "id": "competing-territorial-criteria", "name": "Competing territorial criteria", "description": "Record how linguistic, demographic, strategic, historical and economic arguments competed in particular territorial cases.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which maps, population estimates and strategic arguments supported rival claims, and who produced them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competing-territorial-criteria-q01" }, { "text": "What territorial unit, census date and population categories underlie each demographic claim?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "competing-territorial-criteria-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "self-determination-and-imperial-rule", "name": "Self-determination and imperial rule", "description": "Examine proposed political status and safeguards for affected populations.", "findings": [ { "id": "consultation-mandates-and-protection", "name": "Consultation, mandates and protection", "description": "Distinguish proposals for independence, plebiscites, minority protections and mandates from arrangements adopted or implemented later.", "questions": [ { "text": "How was self-determination interpreted in this case, and whose preferences were recorded or omitted?", "kind": "definition", "id": "consultation-mandates-and-protection-q01" }, { "text": "Which elements of a mandate, minority guarantee or plebiscite were settled at the conference, and which were assigned elsewhere?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "consultation-mandates-and-protection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "security-reparations-and-international-order", "name": "Security, reparations and international order", "description": "Capture negotiation over restraints, compensation and institutions intended to sustain peace.", "rationale": "These issues linked the immediate settlement to competing expectations about security and economic recovery.", "layers": [ { "id": "security-and-collective-arrangements", "name": "Security and collective arrangements", "description": "Track proposed military restrictions, guarantees and League arrangements.", "findings": [ { "id": "security-bargains", "name": "Security bargains", "description": "Connect specific security demands to proposed enforcement mechanisms and their place in the negotiated settlement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which threats did each delegation invoke to justify disarmament, occupation, guarantees or collective security?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "security-bargains-q01" }, { "text": "Which League provisions or security guarantees were agreed in conference negotiations, and which depended on subsequent acceptance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "security-bargains-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reparation-and-economic-terms", "name": "Reparation and economic terms", "description": "Separate compensation principles, liability language and economic mechanisms.", "findings": [ { "id": "liability-amounts-and-deferrals", "name": "Liability, amounts and deferrals", "description": "Record what negotiators specified about reparations and economic obligations, distinguishing later determinations from conference decisions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which liabilities, payment categories or amounts were actually fixed during the conference, and which were deferred?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "liability-amounts-and-deferrals-q01" }, { "text": "For each financial figure, what currency, valuation date, payment period and documentary status apply?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "liability-amounts-and-deferrals-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "settlement-record-and-interpretation", "name": "Settlement record and interpretation", "description": "Connect negotiation evidence to outputs while preserving uncertainty and competing interpretations.", "rationale": "A historical conference model must prevent draft proposals, treaty provisions and retrospective judgments from becoming interchangeable.", "layers": [ { "id": "proposal-to-settlement", "name": "Proposal to settlement", "description": "Follow revisions and handoffs into treaty instruments and subsequent processes.", "findings": [ { "id": "outcome-lineage", "name": "Outcome lineage", "description": "Link a proposal to amendments, recorded agreement and the relevant final instrument, preserving dissent and deferred matters.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which successive drafts and recorded decisions explain the final wording of the selected settlement provision?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "outcome-lineage-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence is required before an agent labels an outcome agreed, signed, ratified or implemented?", "kind": "action", "id": "outcome-lineage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "documentary-evidence-and-causal-claims", "name": "Documentary evidence and causal claims", "description": "Assess records and later explanations without assuming a complete or neutral archive.", "findings": [ { "id": "record-perspective-and-inference", "name": "Record perspective and inference", "description": "Compare minutes, correspondence, petitions and memoirs; published diplomatic collections provide a starting corpus, not an exhaustive account. Source: [U.S. diplomatic records, Paris Peace Conference, Volume I](https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv01).", "questions": [ { "text": "Who created and selected each record, and which participants or informal negotiations does it leave undocumented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "record-perspective-and-inference-q01" }, { "text": "Which claims about later instability are direct observations, contemporary predictions or retrospective causal interpretations?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "record-perspective-and-inference-q02" }, { "text": "How should an agent report conflicting accounts when the available records cannot resolve them?", "kind": "action", "id": "record-perspective-and-inference-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The name is ambiguous without a date; this description assumes the conference following the First World War.", "The conference opened on 18 January 1919; accounts differ in how they delimit its conclusion and distinguish it from subsequent treaty negotiations.", "The settlement's contribution to later conflict remains debated; it should not be described as a sufficient or inevitable cause of the Second World War." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Paris Peace Conference this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Negotiating peace treaties with the defeated Central Powers, including the Treaty of Versailles with Germany.", "Determining territorial settlements and arrangements for some disputed populations and borders.", "Establishing the League of Nations and its mandate system.", "Negotiating reparations, military restrictions and other obligations imposed on defeated states." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Paris Peace Conference this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Unequal participation limited the settlement's legitimacy: defeated powers were largely excluded from substantive negotiations.", "Selective application of national self-determination left minorities within newly established or enlarged states.", "Colonial interests constrained the independence aspirations of peoples outside Europe.", "Disputes over reparations, security and enforcement weakened the durability of the settlement.", "The United States did not ratify the Treaty of Versailles or join the League of Nations, reducing support for the institutional order the conference helped create." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Paris Peace Conference this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In Europe, negotiations concentrated on borders, security, reparations and the consequences of imperial collapse.", "In former Ottoman territories and former German colonies, settlements included mandates administered by designated powers.", "In East Asia, the Shandong settlement transferred German rights to Japan rather than restoring them directly to China, provoking Chinese opposition." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Paris Peace Conference this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Treaty of Versailles", "difference": "The treaty established peace terms with Germany; the conference was the broader negotiating process that produced several settlements." }, { "name": "League of Nations", "difference": "The League was a continuing international organization; the conference was a diplomatic event that helped establish it." }, { "name": "Paris Peace Conference of 1946", "difference": "The 1946 conference concerned peace settlements after the Second World War with Italy, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria and Finland." }, { "name": "Congress of Vienna", "difference": "The Congress of Vienna negotiated the European settlement after the Napoleonic Wars in 1814-1815." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Paris Peace Conference this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the originating registry record definitively identify the 1919 conference rather than another Paris peace conference?", "Which terminal date and successor-body boundary best fit the registry's intended event granularity?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this conference and require this entry to link to that publication?", "How completely can representation and consultation be reconstructed for colonial petitioners, emerging states and populations affected by disputed borders?", "Which contested assessments of the settlement's consequences should be retained as attributed interpretations, and what evidence distinguishes them?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 26 } }