{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:41:49Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 24.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09534-42a5-71a1-839a-e80fb182e711\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Joseon white porcelain\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 04", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 84.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09534-42a9-7f10-9903-2f782db988e6\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Joseon white porcelain\nRegistry id: vr.tr.joseon-white-porcelain\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:39:29+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:30+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q4215713", "registryId": "vr.tr.joseon-white-porcelain", "name": "Joseon white porcelain", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q4215713/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.joseon-white-porcelain", "name": "Joseon white porcelain", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognize Joseon white porcelain, evaluate evidence for its attribution and condition, and determine appropriate cataloguing, interpretation, and care actions.", "definition": "Joseon white porcelain is the Korean ceramic tradition of high-fired, vitrified white-bodied wares with a transparent glaze, made during the Joseon dynasty for courtly, ritual and everyday use, including both undecorated and painted objects.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the identification and interpretation of the historical Korean ceramic tradition registered as vr.tr.joseon-white-porcelain, including criteria for relating individual objects to it; it provisionally includes decorated white-bodied porcelain while keeping the tradition distinct from its physical examples and later revivals.", "in_scope": [ "Evidence that a ceramic belongs to historical Joseon white-porcelain production", "White porcelain body, glaze, forming traces, and decorative variants", "Vessel forms and evidence for domestic, court, ritual, or scholarly use", "Kiln, production-period, and patronage attribution with explicit uncertainty", "Object-specific condition and interventions that affect interpretation or handling", "Relationships among the tradition, vessel types, individual objects, and later adaptations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Porcelain chemistry and manufacture independent of the Joseon tradition", "Buncheong and Goryeo celadon as separate ceramic traditions", "Chinese and Japanese porcelain traditions beyond attribution comparisons", "Modern moon jars and other revivals as historical Joseon production", "Complete institutional histories of kilns, museums, and collecting organizations", "Image licensing, ownership law, and market valuation beyond links to relevant records" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Inspect the ceramic body separately from the white surface: white slip over a relatively coarse gray body supports buncheong attribution rather than white porcelain. [The Met: Joseon Buncheong Ware](https://www.metmuseum.org/pt/essays/joseon-buncheong-ware-between-celadon-and-porcelain)", "Require converging evidence for Korean production and a Joseon-period date; whiteness, simplicity, or a Korean-looking silhouette alone cannot distinguish a historical example from an import or revival.", "Do not equate white porcelain with an undecorated surface: museum classifications include white porcelain painted in underglaze cobalt blue and iron brown. [British Museum: Storage jar](https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_1913-1007-1)", "Treat moon jar as a vessel subtype rather than a synonym for the whole tradition; the catalogue also includes forms such as dishes. [British Museum: Moon jar](https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/object/A_1999-0302-1) [The Met: Dish](https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/72499)", "Separate court-kiln attribution from tradition membership: Joseon porcelain production also involved regional kilns. [The Met: Joseon Buncheong Ware](https://www.metmuseum.org/pt/essays/joseon-buncheong-ware-between-celadon-and-porcelain)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Tradition attribution", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported; provisional; disputed; rejected; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a catalogue label or visual resemblance from becoming an unquestioned authentication." }, { "name": "Production interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "earliest and latest proposed year CE, with dating method and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Supports historical membership and comparison without inventing a precise production year." }, { "name": "Body and surface classification", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "white porcelain body; white-slipped nonporcelain body; other; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Addresses the principal material confusion with white-surfaced buncheong." }, { "name": "Glaze appearance", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "observed hue, transparency, gloss, and surface variation under recorded lighting", "why_it_matters": "Makes comparisons repeatable while distinguishing observation from inferred glaze composition." }, { "name": "Decoration", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "undecorated; cobalt-blue painting; iron-brown painting; other identified technique; mixed; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents decorated white-bodied examples from being excluded solely because they are not plain." }, { "name": "Vessel form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "jar; moon jar candidate; bottle; bowl; dish; other documented form; fragment of unresolved form", "why_it_matters": "Locates an example within the tradition without making one iconic form universal." }, { "name": "Dimensions and profile", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "height, maximum diameter, rim diameter, and foot diameter in mm; ratios dimensionless", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison of proportions, form assignments, and practical support requirements." }, { "name": "Production attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "links to proposed kiln site, kiln group, workshop, or production region, each with evidence and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps manufacture distinct from findspot, later ownership, and presumed court association." }, { "name": "Historical function", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "links to documented or proposed domestic, court, ritual, scholarly, or other use contexts", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes evidence of actual use from expectations based on vessel shape." }, { "name": "Material integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "intact; fragmentary; cracked; repaired; reconstructed; composite; unresolved, with affected areas", "why_it_matters": "Determines which features remain reliable for attribution and which require handling review." }, { "name": "Inscription or mark", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "links to located images, transcriptions, readings, and proposed functions", "why_it_matters": "Preserves potentially diagnostic evidence without automatically treating a mark as a maker signature." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a candidate with documented Joseon porcelain and buncheong examples and explain a provisional classification.", "Record competing dates and kiln attributions, identifying the evidence needed to resolve them.", "Link a vessel to a form or decorative subtype while preserving its membership in the broader tradition.", "Produce an interpretation that separates observed features, documented use, and later aesthetic readings.", "Flag repairs or unstable features for specialist review before handling, sampling, or display.", "Connect modern adaptations to historical precedents without misclassifying their production period." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe Joseon white porcelain styles and periods from museum and scholarly sources.", "Report an object's provenance and attribution as documented by the holding institution." ], "must_not": [ "Attribute a piece to the Joseon period without expert assessment.", "Help trade or move pieces that may have been looted or illegally exported.", "Handle, clean or restore a piece without the owner's consent and a conservator.", "Present a reproduction as an original." ], "requires_human": [ "Authentication, valuation or sale of a piece.", "Moving a piece across borders." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Joseon porcelain is part of Korean cultural heritage, and many pieces left Korea under contested circumstances.", "False attributions defraud buyers and distort history." ], "affected_parties": [ "Korean communities and heritage bodies", "Collectors and buyers", "Museums" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The owner of each piece; heritage authorities oversee designated objects.", "master_systems": [ "Museum collection records", "National cultural heritage registers" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "White or bluish-white glazed vessels such as jars, bowls and bottles, often with restrained forms.", "Some pieces carry underglaze blue, iron brown or copper red decoration.", "Moon jars, large round jars, are a characteristic form, but attribution needs expert study." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Porcelain is fragile and can be broken by handling or transport.", "Forgeries and reproductions circulate in the market." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, 1970, UNESCO." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Joseon white porcelain was made for court service, ritual practice and everyday activities such as storing, serving and consuming food or drink.", "Surviving objects are encountered in museums, archaeological collections and private collections as evidence of Korean ceramic production and social history.", "Cataloguing and conservation use an object's form, decoration, manufacturing traces, provenance and condition to assess its attribution and care needs." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q4215713: Joseon white porcelain", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4215713", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Joseon white porcelain", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseon_white_porcelain", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "tradition-membership", "name": "Tradition membership", "description": "Determine what the registry concept includes and whether a candidate belongs to it.", "rationale": "A white appearance or a familiar vessel shape cannot independently establish historical Joseon attribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "historical-boundary", "name": "Historical boundary", "description": "Separate historical manufacture from stylistic affiliation and later attribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "period-and-production-evidence", "name": "Period and production evidence", "description": "Record Korean origin and production date as supported claims, allowing uncertainty and distinguishing manufacture from later collection history.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports manufacture in Korea within the historical period used by the source?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "period-and-production-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Could this be an imported vessel, later revival, or reproduction, and what evidence discriminates among those possibilities?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "period-and-production-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "white-porcelain-boundary", "name": "White porcelain boundary", "description": "Define material membership and the treatment of decorated variants.", "findings": [ { "id": "body-before-surface", "name": "Body before surface", "description": "Record body classification independently of apparent whiteness, surface decoration, and catalogue terminology.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does an exposed foot, existing break, or technical examination distinguish a porcelain body from white slip over another ceramic body?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "body-before-surface-q01" }, { "text": "Does the authority assigning the term white porcelain include decorated white-bodied wares, and is that usage consistent with this entry?", "kind": "definition", "id": "body-before-surface-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "fabrication-and-surface", "name": "Fabrication and surface", "description": "Capture the material and making evidence used to compare Joseon porcelain examples.", "rationale": "Body, glaze, forming traces, and decoration can constrain attribution more effectively than a general impression of simplicity.", "layers": [ { "id": "body-glaze-and-forming", "name": "Body, glaze, and forming", "description": "Describe observable construction evidence without treating it as a complete firing recipe.", "findings": [ { "id": "construction-evidence", "name": "Construction evidence", "description": "Record exposed body, glaze coverage, foot treatment, joins, and firing-related deformation; distinguish direct observation from technical inference.", "questions": [ { "text": "What do the foot, interior, and any existing breaks reveal about body, glaze application, and forming?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "construction-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which proposed clay, firing, or construction claims require technical analysis rather than visual inspection?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "construction-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "decoration-and-marks", "name": "Decoration and marks", "description": "Separate decorative technique, subject matter, and inscriptions.", "findings": [ { "id": "surface-evidence", "name": "Surface evidence", "description": "Describe the location and apparent technique of decoration and marks, preserving uncertainty about pigment identity, readings, and later additions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which decoration is demonstrably under the glaze, and what supports identification of its colorant or technique?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "surface-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What supports the reading, date, and proposed function of each inscription or mark?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "surface-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "kilns-and-chronology", "name": "Kilns and chronology", "description": "Connect material evidence to production places, periods, and institutions.", "rationale": "Court association, kiln location, and production date are distinct claims that need independent support.", "layers": [ { "id": "production-place", "name": "Production place", "description": "Assess kiln attribution against archaeological and documentary comparators.", "findings": [ { "id": "kiln-attribution", "name": "Kiln attribution", "description": "Distinguish a named kiln-site attribution from a broader Bunwon, regional, or Korean attribution; avoid upgrading stylistic similarity into documented origin.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which excavated comparators, records, or material analyses support the proposed kiln attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "kiln-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Does Bunwon here identify an administrative production system, a kiln group, or a particular site and phase?", "kind": "definition", "id": "kiln-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "dating-and-patronage", "name": "Dating and patronage", "description": "Keep chronological reasoning separate from assumptions about intended users.", "findings": [ { "id": "date-and-court-association", "name": "Date and court association", "description": "Preserve competing date ranges and distinguish court production, court supply, and later claims of royal ownership.", "questions": [ { "text": "What independently dated contexts or securely dated comparisons constrain the production interval?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "date-and-court-association-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports court manufacture, supply, or ownership beyond whiteness and perceived quality?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "date-and-court-association-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "forms-use-and-meaning", "name": "Forms, use, and meaning", "description": "Relate vessel morphology to historical functions and attributed meanings.", "rationale": "An iconic form or modern aesthetic interpretation must not substitute for evidence about the varied objects within this tradition.", "layers": [ { "id": "vessel-types", "name": "Vessel types", "description": "Identify forms using recorded morphology and explicit typological criteria.", "findings": [ { "id": "moon-jar-and-other-forms", "name": "Moon jar and other forms", "description": "Record the criteria for a moon-jar attribution and retain other forms as equally valid members of the tradition.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which profile, proportion, rim, foot, and construction observations support the assigned vessel type?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "moon-jar-and-other-forms-q01" }, { "text": "What cited typology distinguishes a moon jar from other rounded white porcelain jars?", "kind": "definition", "id": "moon-jar-and-other-forms-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-and-received-meaning", "name": "Historical and received meaning", "description": "Separate evidence of use from cultural interpretation and later reception.", "findings": [ { "id": "use-and-aesthetic-attribution", "name": "Use and aesthetic attribution", "description": "Record proposed functions and readings of whiteness or restraint with their sources, dates, and scope of applicability.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do records, find context, residues, wear, or associated objects support the proposed use of this vessel?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "use-and-aesthetic-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Is an interpretation involving Confucian ideals or aesthetic restraint historically documented, a scholarly inference, or a later reception claim?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "use-and-aesthetic-attribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "integrity-and-responsible-use", "name": "Integrity and responsible use", "description": "Assess how survival, repair, and documentation affect interpretation and permissible intervention.", "rationale": "Restoration can alter the white surface and vessel profile used for attribution, while construction features can affect support and examination.", "layers": [ { "id": "original-and-altered-fabric", "name": "Original and altered fabric", "description": "Separate manufacture-related variation from damage and restoration.", "findings": [ { "id": "surface-and-profile-integrity", "name": "Surface and profile integrity", "description": "Map cracks, fills, overpaint, replaced parts, and possible firing features to the areas used in classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which apparent glaze variations, asymmetries, or seams belong to manufacture, and which reflect damage or repair?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "surface-and-profile-integrity-q01" }, { "text": "Could restored whiteness, a reconstructed rim, or an assembled profile be driving the current attribution?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "surface-and-profile-integrity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "examination-and-interpretation-actions", "name": "Examination and interpretation actions", "description": "Translate evidence gaps and object condition into justified next steps.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-led-next-action", "name": "Evidence-led next action", "description": "Select documentation, specialist comparison, or conservation review according to the unresolved attribution question and the condition of the actual vessel.", "questions": [ { "text": "Would foot and interior photography, examination of an existing break, or comparison with kiln material resolve the uncertainty before sampling is considered?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-led-next-action-q01" }, { "text": "Given the vessel's joins, repairs, and support points, what handling or display restrictions has a qualified examination established?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-led-next-action-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes a historical ceramic tradition and class of physical objects, not an individual authored work, edition or information carrier.", "Exact dating, kiln attribution and distinctions between court and provincial production require object-specific evidence.", "No universal identifier or numerical material specification is asserted; individual objects may have museum accession numbers or heritage designations." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Undecorated white porcelain", "Blue-and-white porcelain painted with cobalt pigment", "Porcelain with underglaze iron-brown decoration", "Porcelain with underglaze copper-red decoration" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Vessels for royal court dining and service", "Vessels for Confucian ancestral rites", "Domestic bowls, dishes, bottles and storage jars", "Scholar's implements, including water droppers and brush holders", "Museum collection, exhibition and study of Korean ceramic history" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Brittle fracture, chipping and impact damage", "Cracking from rapid temperature changes", "Firing defects such as warping, glaze pinholes and cracks", "Glaze crazing and staining of cracks or exposed ceramic body", "Misattribution of later reproductions or heavily restored objects as intact period wares" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The official kiln complex around Gwangju in present-day Gyeonggi Province supplied the court and was a major centre of Joseon white porcelain production.", "Provincial kilns also produced white porcelain, with differences in clay, glaze, firing quality and vessel forms." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Korean white porcelain", "difference": "The broader category includes white porcelain from periods outside Joseon; Joseon white porcelain is distinguished by its historical production context." }, { "name": "Buncheong ware", "difference": "Buncheong generally has a stoneware body covered or decorated with white slip, whereas Joseon white porcelain has a white porcelain body." }, { "name": "Goryeo celadon", "difference": "Goryeo celadon is principally associated with the preceding dynasty and a characteristic greenish glaze, rather than the white-bodied, transparent-glazed Joseon porcelain tradition." }, { "name": "Moon jar", "difference": "A moon jar is a rounded white porcelain jar form strongly associated with Joseon ceramics; it is one form within the tradition, not a synonym for the whole category." }, { "name": "Chinese blue-and-white porcelain", "difference": "Both traditions use cobalt decoration beneath a transparent glaze, but production origin and historical context distinguish Chinese wares from Joseon examples." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Joseon white porcelain this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend the broad white-bodied porcelain tradition, including decorated wares, or only undecorated white ware?", "Which chronological convention should govern late examples around the transition from Joseon to the Korean Empire?", "Which published typologies provide defensible criteria for moon jars and other vessel forms without imposing unsupported dimensional thresholds?", "Which archaeological reference collections and technical studies can distinguish kiln groups and production phases with stated confidence?", "How far can interpretations of whiteness, restraint, and Confucian values be supported for particular periods and user groups rather than generalized across the tradition?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }