{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:29:33Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09529-457e-7e12-bf4e-316c55504ed0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Infaq\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 registere", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 69.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09529-4573-7eb3-96f5-6f976046bdb8\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Infaq\nRegistry id: vr.tr.infaq\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext for " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:38:34+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:33:30+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "definition", "distinguishing_features", "purpose", "scope_statement" ], "answering_review": "09da302b2d7d94afb8a087601ef998f41f3e4ebf2bd1db0d542c9dd0bba5a104" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q4272550", "registryId": "vr.tr.infaq", "name": "Infaq", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q4272550/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.infaq", "name": "Infaq", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise Infaq as spending or disbursement, identify its lexical, religious or institutional context, and assess any stated purpose and conditions within that context.", "definition": "Infaq is an Arabic word meaning spending or disbursement generally, with contextual religious uses concerning expenditure approved by Islam and institutional uses concerning particular categories of giving.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the meaning, interpretive boundaries and application criteria of Infaq for vr.tr.infaq as the Arabic word for spending or disbursement, including its contextual religious and institutional uses.", "in_scope": [ "Meanings of Infaq and the contexts in which each meaning applies", "Distinctions and overlaps with zakat, sadaqah, waqf and maintenance expenditure", "Interpretive authority for classifying spending as Infaq", "Contributor intent, contributed wealth and designated benefit", "Conditions governing allocation and evidence of fulfilment" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete zakat liability calculations and recipient rules", "Waqf establishment and endowed-property administration", "General jurisprudence of family maintenance", "Operational models of charities and collection institutions", "Payment processing and general accounting infrastructure", "The whole discipline of Islamic jurisprudence or Islamic economics" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Determine whether the term denotes spending generally, a religious spending concept or a particular institutional donation category; the name alone does not settle its scope.", "In the Indonesian institutional definition presented by BAZNAS, infak concerns wealth given outside zakat for public benefit, as described at https://www.baznas.go.id/faq-baznas.", "Under that same definition, a purely nonmaterial good deed can be sedekah but does not meet the material-wealth criterion for infak, as described at https://www.baznas.go.id/faq-baznas.", "Check whether an apparent donation establishes an enduring endowment or discharges a maintenance obligation before treating it as an ordinary Infaq contribution.", "Require evidence of the applicable interpretation before describing every instance of Infaq as voluntary or imposing zakat-specific eligibility rules." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Interpretive scope", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Broad religious spending concept; institutional donation category; other attributed usage; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a local collection category from silently defining the entire concept." }, { "name": "Defining authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named text, interpreter, institution or jurisdiction, with passage and date where applicable", "why_it_matters": "Makes classification and action conditions attributable and reviewable." }, { "name": "Normative classification", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Required; recommended; permitted; disallowed; disputed; unassessed, under a named interpretation", "why_it_matters": "Records the claimed status of the particular expenditure without inferring it from the label." }, { "name": "Contribution form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Money; goods; other wealth; mixed; unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Supports examination of material contribution and valuation." }, { "name": "Contribution quantity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Amount and currency, or physical quantity and unit; valuation date and method when converted", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to compare what was intended, transferred and applied." }, { "name": "Declared intention", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Expressly declared; indirectly evidenced; unknown; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates recorded statements from inaccessible private motivation." }, { "name": "Designated benefit", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Specified recipient, beneficiary group or purpose, with any allocation conditions", "why_it_matters": "Provides the basis for assessing whether a proposed use matches the contribution." }, { "name": "Fulfilment stage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed; pledged; transferred; allocated; delivered; returned; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a promise or collection receipt from being mistaken for completed benefit." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a claimed Infaq contribution under an explicitly identified interpretation.", "Explain whether a case overlaps with or belongs to a neighbouring giving concept.", "Record intended benefit and contribution conditions before proposing allocation.", "Flag unsupported transfers of zakat rules into an Infaq assessment.", "Compare contribution, allocation and delivery evidence to identify unresolved fulfilment.", "Refer interpretive disputes to a named qualified authority with the missing evidence identified." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the concept of infaq as described in Islamic sources and scholarship, citing them.", "Distinguish infaq from zakat and sadaqah as different traditions and schools do." ], "must_not": [ "Issue religious rulings on what a person must give.", "Use the concept to solicit donations for causes the agent cannot verify.", "Direct giving to groups that fund violence or are sanctioned.", "Mock or misrepresent Islamic charitable practice." ], "requires_human": [ "Making or routing a charitable payment on someone's behalf." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Charitable giving is a religious duty for many; misinformation affects their faith and money.", "Charity fraud exploits generosity and harms both donors and the needy." ], "affected_parties": [ "Muslim donors", "Recipients of charity", "Dependants" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; religious scholars and communities interpret it.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Infaq is encountered in Islamic teaching, household financial responsibilities and charitable giving.", "It is used to discuss spending for religiously approved purposes, including support for dependants and assistance to people in need.", "Its application depends on the purpose of the expenditure and the interpretation used by the community or institution." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Law No 23 of 2011 on Zakat Management, enacted by the Republic of Indonesia, includes provisions for the receipt and distribution of infaq by authorized zakat management bodies." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misrepresentation of a collection's purpose can divert contributions away from intended beneficiaries.", "Pressure to contribute can undermine voluntary consent or leave contributors unable to meet essential household needs.", "Confusing voluntary giving with obligatory expenditure can misstate a person's religious responsibilities.", "Disclosure of contributor or beneficiary information can cause privacy loss or stigmatization." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "Infaq is a concept and practice whose meaning depends on intention and context rather than visible appearance." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q4272550: Infaq", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4272550", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Infaq", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infaq", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meaning-and-boundaries", "name": "Meaning and boundaries", "description": "Identify which meaning of Infaq is intended and how it relates to adjacent concepts.", "rationale": "An agent cannot classify a contribution reliably while switching between broad religious usage and narrower institutional definitions.", "layers": [ { "id": "term-and-context", "name": "Term and context", "description": "Anchor the name to a documented usage.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-infaq-meaning", "name": "Attributed Infaq meaning", "description": "Record the definition used by the relevant speaker or institution, retaining its linguistic and contextual limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does Infaq mean in the source governing this case?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-infaq-meaning-q01" }, { "text": "Which source establishes that meaning, and in what linguistic or institutional context?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-infaq-meaning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "adjacent-giving-concepts", "name": "Adjacent giving concepts", "description": "Make overlap and exclusion explicit rather than assuming mutually exclusive categories.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-boundary", "name": "Classification boundary", "description": "Assess relationships to zakat, sadaqah, waqf and maintenance using the selected interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this case from zakat, waqf or maintenance expenditure?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Does the selected authority allow this case to be described as both Infaq and sadaqah?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretation-and-normative-status", "name": "Interpretation and normative status", "description": "Connect religious classifications to identifiable authorities and case conditions.", "rationale": "The model must preserve disagreement and avoid issuing an unsupported universal ruling.", "layers": [ { "id": "grounds-for-interpretation", "name": "Grounds for interpretation", "description": "Distinguish cited authority from an agent's inference.", "findings": [ { "id": "traceable-interpretive-basis", "name": "Traceable interpretive basis", "description": "Retain the passage, translation or explanation supporting each substantive classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which passage or authoritative explanation supports the proposed classification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "traceable-interpretive-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What limits does that source place on applying its explanation to this case?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "traceable-interpretive-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "case-specific-status", "name": "Case-specific status", "description": "Assess the status of the expenditure in its actual circumstances.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualified-normative-assessment", "name": "Qualified normative assessment", "description": "Record the attributed status, relevant conditions and unresolved disagreement without treating the Infaq label as a ruling.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under the named interpretation, what conditions determine the status of this expenditure?", "kind": "definition", "id": "qualified-normative-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Which unresolved condition or disagreement requires referral before an agent recommends action?", "kind": "action", "id": "qualified-normative-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "intention-and-contributed-wealth", "name": "Intention and contributed wealth", "description": "Describe the contributor's stated purpose and the material contribution being considered.", "rationale": "Assessing Infaq requires connecting an intended act of giving to identifiable wealth without claiming knowledge of private sincerity.", "layers": [ { "id": "declared-giving-intent", "name": "Declared giving intent", "description": "Represent what the contributor has actually stated.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidenced-intention", "name": "Evidenced intention", "description": "Keep declared Infaq designation, intended benefit and unknown motivation distinct.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence records the contributor's designation of this expenditure as Infaq?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidenced-intention-q01" }, { "text": "Which aspects of intention remain unknown and must not be inferred from the payment alone?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidenced-intention-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "wealth-and-disposition", "name": "Wealth and disposition", "description": "Identify what is offered and the contributor's authority to dispose of it.", "findings": [ { "id": "specified-material-contribution", "name": "Specified material contribution", "description": "Record money or goods, their quantity and any unresolved authority to contribute them.", "questions": [ { "text": "What amount or quantity is contributed, using which currency, units and valuation basis?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "specified-material-contribution-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes authority to give this wealth, including any consent required for shared assets?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "specified-material-contribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "benefit-and-allocation", "name": "Benefit and allocation", "description": "Connect the contribution to its intended beneficiaries and permitted uses.", "rationale": "An agent needs case-specific grounds for allocation rather than assuming that any charitable use satisfies the contribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-beneficiaries", "name": "Intended beneficiaries", "description": "Identify who or what is meant to benefit and why that use qualifies.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-benefit-purpose", "name": "Supported benefit purpose", "description": "Record the intended benefit and the criteria supporting it under the selected Infaq interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which recipient, group or purpose is intended to benefit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "supported-benefit-purpose-q01" }, { "text": "What source supports the relevant eligibility criteria without automatically importing zakat categories?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-benefit-purpose-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "allocation-conditions", "name": "Allocation conditions", "description": "Capture instructions affecting how contributed wealth may be used.", "findings": [ { "id": "designated-use-and-variation", "name": "Designated use and variation", "description": "Record purpose restrictions and the authority needed to address an unavailable or changed use.", "questions": [ { "text": "What conditions accompany the contribution concerning purpose, recipient or timing?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "designated-use-and-variation-q01" }, { "text": "If the designated use becomes impossible, who may authorise redirection or return, and on what basis?", "kind": "action", "id": "designated-use-and-variation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "entrustment-and-fulfilment", "name": "Entrustment and fulfilment", "description": "Track whether contributed wealth reaches its designated use, directly or through an intermediary.", "rationale": "Collection, allocation and realised benefit are different states and support different claims about fulfilment.", "layers": [ { "id": "direct-or-mediated-giving", "name": "Direct or mediated giving", "description": "Identify responsibility for receiving and applying the contribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-handling-mandate", "name": "Contribution handling mandate", "description": "Record whether giving is direct or entrusted to an intermediary and what handling conditions apply.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who receives the wealth, and what evidence establishes their mandate to apply it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contribution-handling-mandate-q01" }, { "text": "What agreed basis, if any, permits handling costs to be deducted from this contribution?", "kind": "action", "id": "contribution-handling-mandate-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-of-completion", "name": "Evidence of completion", "description": "Assess material fulfilment while keeping spiritual claims outside empirical verification.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-use-and-unresolved-balance", "name": "Documented use and unresolved balance", "description": "Compare the pledged, received and applied contribution and record remaining uncertainty.", "questions": [ { "text": "How much was pledged, received, applied to the designated use, deducted or returned?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "documented-use-and-unresolved-balance-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports delivery or use, and what remains unverified?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-use-and-unresolved-balance-q02" }, { "text": "What follow-up is justified when the contribution's documented use differs from its conditions?", "kind": "action", "id": "documented-use-and-unresolved-balance-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Infaq is principally a religious and ethical concept and practice, not a standalone discipline; the supplied domain classification should be checked.", "The scope of obligatory spending and its relationship to other categories should be checked against the relevant jurisprudential tradition.", "This description is based on recall; no sources or current jurisdiction-specific rules were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Obligatory spending", "Voluntary spending" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Providing financial support for family members and dependants", "Assisting people experiencing poverty or hardship", "Funding community facilities and public benefit activities", "Collecting and distributing charitable contributions through Islamic organisations" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating voluntary infaq as a substitute for an outstanding zakat obligation", "Diverting contributions from purposes specified by donors", "Assuming that all uses of the term refer exclusively to voluntary charity" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In Indonesian institutional usage, infak commonly denotes contributions accounted for separately from zakat and often presented alongside sedekah.", "Arabic usage of infaq can refer broadly to spending; its religious significance depends on purpose and context." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Zakat", "difference": "Zakat is an obligatory levy governed by specific eligibility, calculation and distribution rules; infaq is a broader spending concept without one universal rate or threshold." }, { "name": "Sadaqah", "difference": "Sadaqah overlaps with charitable infaq but can also encompass nonmaterial acts of kindness; infaq centres on expenditure of wealth or material resources." }, { "name": "Nafaqah", "difference": "Nafaqah denotes maintenance owed to dependants in Islamic jurisprudence; infaq describes spending more broadly." }, { "name": "Waqf", "difference": "Waqf establishes an endowment with rules governing the preservation and use of its assets; infaq does not itself require an endowment." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Infaq this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry's original source identify Infaq as the broad religious concept, a narrower donation category or another referent, and why was it assigned INF.KNW?", "How do relevant Arabic usages and juristic interpretations delimit Infaq in relation to zakat, sadaqah and obligatory maintenance?", "Which interpretations and communities must this model support beyond the Indonesian institutional definition consulted?", "Under each supported interpretation, what rules govern beneficiary eligibility, contribution conditions, handling costs and redirection?", "Which existing Vercy models already cover the concept or its neighbouring forms of giving, and where should this entry link to avoid duplication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 27 } }