{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:31:42Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0952b-7cbc-7b93-b573-eca327dfdb03\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: International Territorial Level\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.PLC\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n#", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 53.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0952b-7cad-7281-901e-1cefa5aa1571\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: International Territorial Level\nRegistry id: vr.tr.international-territorial-level\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.PLC\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:43:04+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:33:30+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "definition", "distinguishing_features", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "in_scope", "owners", "purpose", "scope_statement" ], "answering_review": "6f3c210b14e189e24cc0a5b10df431b83fbf0e78b2121dad3672beb50029f50a" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q4391979", "registryId": "vr.tr.international-territorial-level", "name": "International Territorial Level", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.PLC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q4391979/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.international-territorial-level", "name": "International Territorial Level", "purpose": "Help an AI agent recognise, interpret and apply the United Kingdom's International Territorial Level classification while preserving the levels, territorial units and version that give statistical results their geographic meaning.", "definition": "International Territorial Level (ITL) is the United Kingdom's hierarchical geographic classification system for territorial units used in producing and comparing regional statistics.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the United Kingdom's International Territorial Level classification system, including its hierarchy, territorial unit identifiers, geographic coverage, versions and relationships to other statistical geographies.", "in_scope": [ "The model covers the meaning and statistical purpose of the United Kingdom's ITL classification.", "The model covers ITL levels and the assignment of territorial units within the hierarchy.", "The model covers unit names, codes, boundaries and geographic coverage.", "The model covers relationships and documented correspondences with other statistical and administrative geographies.", "The model covers classification revisions and their implications for comparisons over time." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Individual countries and their complete territorial descriptions", "International organisations and their institutional operations", "Treaties and their complete legal provisions", "Populations, economies and other statistics aggregated over territories", "Physical landforms and ecosystems crossing national borders" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "International Territorial Level names a specific United Kingdom classification system rather than a generic scale spanning several countries.", "Its hierarchy groups territorial units for regional statistical reporting and comparison.", "An ITL unit's level, code and classification version are needed to interpret its geographic identity reliably.", "Statistical classification does not by itself confer administrative status or legal authority on a territorial unit.", "Correspondence with NUTS or other geographic classifications requires documented mappings rather than an assumption that their units are interchangeable." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Territorial framework", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named classification framework, issuing body and version; unresolved if unidentified", "why_it_matters": "The level has interpretable meaning only within a framework or an explicitly stated working interpretation." }, { "name": "International qualification rule", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Framework-defined criterion, such as grouping national territories or delineating a cross-border area", "why_it_matters": "Determines which territorial units qualify without relying on their names." }, { "name": "Position among territorial levels", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Broader, narrower, equivalent, overlapping or incomparable relative to named levels", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from assuming a universal territorial hierarchy." }, { "name": "Extent construction", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Whole-territory aggregation, partial-territory delineation, explicit boundary or unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Explains how assigned units acquire geographic coverage and whether member-country boundaries suffice." }, { "name": "Assignment validity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed, current, superseded or unresolved, with effective dates where available", "why_it_matters": "Keeps historical territorial arrangements distinct from current assignments." }, { "name": "Boundary and membership perspective", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Publishing authority or claimant, source version and treatment of contested territories", "why_it_matters": "Makes disagreements attributable instead of presenting one assignment as universally accepted." } ], "affordances": [ "Evaluate whether a territorial unit meets a documented international-level classification rule.", "Explain how an international level relates to national and other geographic levels in a particular framework.", "Construct a dated coverage view from sourced territorial assignments.", "Compare competing classifications and identify overlapping or missing coverage.", "Check whether a proposed territorial aggregation is supported by the framework's membership and boundary rules." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain and use the United Kingdom's ITL classification with the applicable classification source and version identified.", "Distinguish ITL levels and units from other statistical or administrative geographies.", "Use documented correspondences to relate ITL units to other geographic classifications." ], "must_not": [ "Present ITL as a generic grouping of countries or as a body with legal authority.", "Compare figures across different ITL boundaries or versions without disclosing and addressing their geographic differences.", "Imply that statistical classification establishes sovereignty or administrative jurisdiction." ], "requires_human": [ "Choosing territorial aggregations in reports used for policy requires human review." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "The choice of ITL level and classification version can affect policy comparisons and resource-allocation interpretations.", "Aggregated figures can hide inequalities within ITL areas." ], "affected_parties": [ "Residents of the classified areas are affected by how regional statistics inform decisions.", "Researchers and planners depend on accurate geographic classification." ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The Office for National Statistics maintains the United Kingdom's ITL classification.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misleading comparisons can result when ITL boundaries, codes or versions differ between datasets.", "Treating ITL as a multinational geographic scale can lead to incorrect territorial assignments and statistical interpretation." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "International Territorial Levels divide the United Kingdom into geographic units for producing and comparing regional statistics.", "Analysts use the hierarchy to group statistical observations at different regional scales, recording the classification version when boundaries change.", "In this sense, the term denotes subdivisions within the United Kingdom rather than a grouping of multiple countries." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The International Territorial Level classification, maintained by the Office for National Statistics, defines the United Kingdom statistical hierarchy at ITL levels 1, 2 and 3." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "This statistical classification has no inherent visible form and must be identified through its labels, codes and documented boundaries." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q4391979: International Territorial Level", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4391979", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: International Territorial Level", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Territorial_Level", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "international-level-meaning", "name": "International Level Meaning", "description": "Establishes what the registered term denotes and how international status is determined.", "rationale": "Without a recorded definition, the term could refer to a classification level, a geographic scale or a specific framework category.", "layers": [ { "id": "term-and-framework", "name": "Term and Framework", "description": "Anchors the level to the vocabulary and framework in which it is used.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-level-concept", "name": "Intended Level Concept", "description": "Record evidence establishing whether the term denotes a territorial classification level and preserve the original terminology.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which registry source defines International Territorial Level, and does it describe a level, a scale or a territorial unit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intended-level-concept-q01" }, { "text": "Which framework, language and issuing body supply the term and any accepted alternative names?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-level-concept-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "international-qualification", "name": "International Qualification", "description": "Makes the criterion for international territorial classification explicit.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-rule", "name": "Qualification Rule", "description": "Capture the framework's actual test for international classification without substituting organisational membership or presumed sovereignty.", "questions": [ { "text": "What territorial relationship must exist for a unit to qualify at this level?", "kind": "definition", "id": "qualification-rule-q01" }, { "text": "Can the level include portions of countries, dependent territories or areas outside national jurisdiction, and under which explicit rule?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualification-rule-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "territorial-level-relations", "name": "Territorial Level Relations", "description": "Positions the international level among neighbouring classifications and relates levels across frameworks.", "rationale": "An international level need not occupy the same position or have the same meaning in every territorial system.", "layers": [ { "id": "within-framework-position", "name": "Within-Framework Position", "description": "Records the level's relationships to national and broader geographic categories.", "findings": [ { "id": "hierarchy-and-overlap", "name": "Hierarchy and Overlap", "description": "Establish whether the framework defines a strict hierarchy, overlapping categories or another relationship among territorial levels.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which levels are explicitly broader or narrower than the international level in this framework?", "kind": "definition", "id": "hierarchy-and-overlap-q01" }, { "text": "Must each national territory belong to exactly one international-level unit, or can assignments overlap or be absent?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "hierarchy-and-overlap-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cross-framework-comparison", "name": "Cross-Framework Comparison", "description": "Examines whether apparently similar level names support equivalent assignments.", "findings": [ { "id": "international-and-neighbouring-scales", "name": "International and Neighbouring Scales", "description": "Keep international, supranational, transnational, continental and global classifications distinct until their rules justify a mapping.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does this framework distinguish international from supranational, transnational, continental and global?", "kind": "definition", "id": "international-and-neighbouring-scales-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence permits an agent to translate an assignment at this level into a category in another framework?", "kind": "action", "id": "international-and-neighbouring-scales-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "assigned-territories-and-extent", "name": "Assigned Territories and Extent", "description": "Connects the classification level to its assigned territorial units and their geographic coverage.", "rationale": "The level itself should not be given a single polygon; coverage belongs to the units assigned to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "territorial-unit-assignment", "name": "Territorial Unit Assignment", "description": "Identifies units classified at the level and the membership rules supporting each assignment.", "findings": [ { "id": "assignment-evidence", "name": "Assignment Evidence", "description": "Record sourced examples and assignment criteria, distinguishing a territorial grouping from an institution with a similar name.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which territorial units are explicitly assigned to this level, and what source supports each assignment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "assignment-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does each unit include entire national territories, selected portions or another explicitly defined spatial combination?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "assignment-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "coverage-representation", "name": "Coverage Representation", "description": "Specifies how assigned units' extents can be represented and compared.", "findings": [ { "id": "extent-derivation", "name": "Extent Derivation", "description": "Describe how a unit's coverage is obtained, including territorial inclusions, exclusions and any spatial representation used.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the extent supplied by a boundary publisher or derived from member territories, and how are overseas areas, enclaves and maritime areas treated?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "extent-derivation-q01" }, { "text": "If coverage is mapped or measured, which boundary version, coordinate reference system and resolution support the result?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "extent-derivation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "territorial-change-and-use", "name": "Territorial Change and Use", "description": "Preserves temporal and viewpoint differences and constrains what agents may infer from classification.", "rationale": "Membership and boundary changes can alter coverage, while international classification alone cannot establish jurisdiction or valid aggregation.", "layers": [ { "id": "dated-and-contested-assignments", "name": "Dated and Contested Assignments", "description": "Maintains dated assignments and attributable alternatives where territorial inclusion is contested.", "findings": [ { "id": "assignment-history-and-perspective", "name": "Assignment History and Perspective", "description": "Track effective dates and publishing perspectives so historical changes and competing territorial claims remain distinguishable.", "questions": [ { "text": "When did a unit's assignment or membership take effect, and which source distinguishes effective dates from publication dates?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "assignment-history-and-perspective-q01" }, { "text": "Where sources disagree about territorial inclusion, which authority or claimant supports each alternative?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "assignment-history-and-perspective-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "permitted-inferences", "name": "Permitted Inferences", "description": "Determines which geographic, statistical and authority-related conclusions the classification supports.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-use-conditions", "name": "Classification Use Conditions", "description": "Require separate evidence for jurisdiction and check territorial compatibility before combining data across assigned units.", "questions": [ { "text": "Before aggregating observations at this level, how should an agent check reference dates, overlapping coverage and unassigned territories?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-use-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "What separate evidence is required before an agent attributes governing authority or jurisdiction to an international-level territorial grouping?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-use-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The label has no supplied sense; the definition assumes a geographic classification level above the national level.", "Check the originating registry record for a specialized meaning before assigning formal varieties or identifiers.", "M49 is a relevant statistical classification, not evidence that this exact label is a formally standardized category." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The United Nations Statistics Division's M49 classification provides country or area codes and geographic groupings relevant to international statistical aggregation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Aggregating statistics across countries within a defined geographic grouping.", "Specifying the geographic scope of cross-border planning or analysis.", "Organizing geographic information above the national scale." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating a geographic scale as if it were a territory with its own government.", "Assuming that international geographic groupings have universally agreed membership.", "Comparing aggregates whose territorial coverage or reference dates differ.", "Presenting disputed territorial inclusion without identifying the authority or convention used." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Geographic, statistical and institutional groupings can cover different sets of countries despite using similar regional names." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "National territorial level", "difference": "Uses an individual country as the geographic reference rather than a grouping spanning countries." }, { "name": "Supranational organization", "difference": "Is an institution with members and defined powers; an international territorial level is a geographic scale." }, { "name": "International waters", "difference": "Concerns maritime jurisdiction rather than a level of geographic aggregation." }, { "name": "Transboundary region", "difference": "Is a particular region crossing a border, potentially covering only parts of countries, rather than the abstract scale at which regions are classified." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of International Territorial Level this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "What original registry or Wikidata source establishes the intended meaning of International Territorial Level?", "Does the term name a general geographic scale or a level in a particular territorial classification framework?", "Which sourced examples establish its inclusion rules, especially for partial national territories and areas outside national jurisdiction?", "How does the originating framework distinguish international from supranational, continental and global levels?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, making a registry link preferable to a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }