{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T09:14:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "missingProviders": [ "Grok" ], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": null, "turns": null, "seconds": 14.5, "error": "Error: Internal error: {\n \"message\": \"API error (status 402 Payment Required): Grok Build usage balance exhausted\",\n \"http_status\": 402\n}", "retried": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 82.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b24-aa22-7d72-8e69-0c74fad011ab\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: ice age\nRegistry id: vr.tr.ice-age\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy m" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:07:20+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:31+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q49367", "registryId": "vr.tr.ice-age", "name": "ice age", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q49367/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.ice-age", "name": "ice age", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a proposed ice age, assess the evidence and uncertainty defining it, and decide which classifications, comparisons and revisions are justified.", "definition": "", "scope_statement": "This model owns the representation of an ice age as a geological climate interval characterised by persistent, extensive continental ice, including its identification, temporal boundaries, spatial expression, supporting evidence and relationship to shorter glacial fluctuations.", "in_scope": [ "The operational meaning of ice age used by a particular classification", "The interval's proposed onset, termination, duration and internal phases", "The distribution and persistence of continental ice and associated climate conditions", "Evidence, dating methods and uncertainty supporting identification and reconstruction", "Proposed causes, feedbacks and competing interpretations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Detailed geometry and flow mechanics of an individual glacier or ice sheet", "The complete geological history of a basin, formation or outcrop", "Individual proxy samples and laboratory procedures as independently managed research objects", "Short-lived cold weather, seasonal freezing and local snow cover", "Complete evolutionary, archaeological or human settlement histories", "Modern climate policy and interventions" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An ice-age classification requires evidence of persistent continental glaciation at geological scale; a cold temperature estimate alone does not establish it.", "The model distinguishes the enclosing ice age from a glacial phase or glacial maximum within it, even when everyday language uses the same name for both.", "A local glacier advance does not establish an ice age without evidence connecting it to a broader, sustained glacial climate regime.", "An interglacial does not automatically terminate an enclosing ice age; termination must be evaluated against the explicitly adopted ice-persistence criterion.", "A proposed ice age must have a traceable geological interpretation and chronology, rather than being identified solely by a popular name or historical cold episode." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification convention", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Explicit cited definition; broad icehouse interval, narrower glacial interval, or unresolved usage", "why_it_matters": "Prevents comparisons between intervals called ice ages under incompatible definitions." }, { "name": "Temporal bounds", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Onset and termination estimates in years, ka or Ma before a stated reference, with uncertainty; ongoing where applicable", "why_it_matters": "Supports chronological placement without treating estimated boundaries as exact dates." }, { "name": "Continental ice persistence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Supported continuous presence, supported intermittent presence, unresolved continuity, or unsupported; specify reconstruction resolution", "why_it_matters": "Tests whether the interval satisfies the adopted definition across its proposed duration." }, { "name": "Reconstructed ice extent", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Area in square kilometres or bounded geographic and palaeolatitudinal coverage, by time slice and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes local glaciation from geographically extensive conditions and captures advances and retreats." }, { "name": "Climate reconstruction", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Temperature in degrees Celsius or anomaly relative to a named baseline, with geographic coverage, method and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Allows climate comparisons while separating regional proxies from global estimates." }, { "name": "Phase relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Contains glacial phase, contains interglacial phase, overlaps regional glaciation, or has disputed correlation", "why_it_matters": "Preserves the distinction between the broad interval and its uneven regional or shorter temporal expressions." }, { "name": "Evidential standing", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed, supported, disputed, or superseded under stated review criteria", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent may present the identification as supported or must retain competing interpretations." } ], "affordances": [ "Evaluate whether a candidate interval meets an explicitly selected ice-age definition.", "Compare proposed ice ages using compatible temporal scales, reconstructions and uncertainty.", "Attach geological evidence to the specific claims about ice presence, timing and extent that it supports.", "Relate glacial and interglacial phases to an enclosing interval without conflating their boundaries.", "Identify observations or dating work that could discriminate between competing reconstructions.", "Revise or qualify an identification when new evidence changes its boundaries, extent or interpretation." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the scientific concept of an ice age and its evidence, citing geological and climate sources.", "Distinguish ice ages from glacial periods within them and from the popular use of the term.", "Report dated boundaries of ice ages from recognized stratigraphic authorities." ], "must_not": [ "Present past ice ages as evidence that current climate change is natural, against the scientific consensus.", "Invent dates, temperatures or ice extents not supported by published data.", "Misattribute findings to researchers or bodies that did not make them." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing revised chronologies or boundaries as authoritative." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Ice age science informs understanding of climate change; distortion of it misleads public decisions.", "Indigenous oral histories of ice and sea-level change deserve respectful treatment." ], "affected_parties": [ "Students and the public", "Climate researchers", "Policy makers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the concept; stratigraphic commissions curate formal time boundaries.", "master_systems": [ "International chronostratigraphic chart" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Landscapes with moraines, erratic boulders, U-shaped valleys and striated bedrock left by former ice.", "Records of ice-age climate in ice cores and ocean sediment layers." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misreading natural climate cycles as excusing present warming leads to harmful policy.", "Dating errors can propagate through many studies that rely on a shared chronology." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "International Chronostratigraphic Chart, International Commission on Stratigraphy." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "An ice age is used in geology and paleoclimatology to describe a prolonged interval of Earth's history with extensive persistent ice sheets and glaciers.", "The concept supports interpretation of sedimentary records, landforms and evidence of past climate.", "An ice age can contain both colder glacial intervals and warmer interglacial intervals, so it does not mean continuously uniform cold." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q49367: ice age", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49367", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Ice age", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "ice-age-identification", "name": "Ice-age identification", "description": "Establishes which geological climate phenomenon the name denotes and what qualifies it as an ice age.", "rationale": "Ice age can denote intervals at different temporal scales, so recognition depends on an explicit classification convention.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-threshold", "name": "Classification threshold", "description": "Makes the required scale and persistence of continental glaciation explicit.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualifying-glacial-regime", "name": "Qualifying glacial regime", "description": "Records the adopted criterion for distinguishing an ice age from isolated or temporary glaciation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What definition specifies the required persistence and geographic scale of continental ice?", "kind": "definition", "id": "qualifying-glacial-regime-q01" }, { "text": "Which observations establish that this interval meets that definition rather than merely recording regional cooling?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualifying-glacial-regime-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "names-and-nesting", "name": "Names and nesting", "description": "Separates the enclosing interval from similarly named phases and regional episodes.", "findings": [ { "id": "referent-and-phase-relations", "name": "Referent and phase relations", "description": "Records what each attested name refers to and how narrower glacial intervals relate to it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does each source use ice age for the enclosing climate regime, an individual glacial phase or another interval?", "kind": "definition", "id": "referent-and-phase-relations-q01" }, { "text": "Which named glaciations and interglacials fall within the proposed interval, and which relationships remain disputed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "referent-and-phase-relations-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "glacial-chronology", "name": "Glacial chronology", "description": "Represents the dating and temporal structure of the proposed ice age.", "rationale": "Ice-age onset and termination are reconstructed from records that may differ in resolution and regional timing.", "layers": [ { "id": "onset-and-termination", "name": "Onset and termination", "description": "Defines the events or criteria used to place the interval's outer boundaries.", "findings": [ { "id": "boundary-age-estimates", "name": "Boundary age estimates", "description": "Records proposed boundary ages with their dating basis, uncertainty and geographic applicability.", "questions": [ { "text": "What dated evidence constrains onset and termination, and what uncertainty accompanies each estimate?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "boundary-age-estimates-q01" }, { "text": "Do the proposed boundaries mark a global regime change, a regional event or a convention selected for correlation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "boundary-age-estimates-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "internal-temporal-structure", "name": "Internal temporal structure", "description": "Represents advances, retreats and possible interruptions without assuming a uniform frozen interval.", "findings": [ { "id": "phase-sequence-and-continuity", "name": "Phase sequence and continuity", "description": "Records the sequence of reconstructed phases and the evidence for ice persistence between them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which glacial advances, retreats and warmer phases can be resolved, and at what temporal resolution?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "phase-sequence-and-continuity-q01" }, { "text": "Where do gaps in the record prevent a conclusion about continuous continental ice presence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "phase-sequence-and-continuity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "ice-and-climate-expression", "name": "Ice and climate expression", "description": "Reconstructs where continental ice existed and how climate conditions varied during the interval.", "rationale": "The label alone cannot establish ice coverage, severity or whether regional records describe comparable conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "continental-ice-distribution", "name": "Continental ice distribution", "description": "Locates reconstructed ice bodies in the geography appropriate to each time slice.", "findings": [ { "id": "extent-and-palaeogeography", "name": "Extent and palaeogeography", "description": "Records minimum supported ice coverage, inferred limits and the palaeogeographic reconstruction used.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where is continental glaciation directly evidenced, and where is its extent inferred?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "extent-and-palaeogeography-q01" }, { "text": "Which palaeogeographic reconstruction places those observations, and how uncertain are their palaeolatitudes?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "extent-and-palaeogeography-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "climate-and-ocean-context", "name": "Climate and ocean context", "description": "Places ice reconstructions alongside temperature and sea-level evidence at compatible scales.", "findings": [ { "id": "reconstructed-climate-conditions", "name": "Reconstructed climate conditions", "description": "Records what temperature and sea-level reconstructions contribute without treating either as an unambiguous measure of ice volume.", "questions": [ { "text": "What temperature and sea-level estimates exist for matching time slices, with what baselines and uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reconstructed-climate-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "How are local effects and non-glacial influences separated from signals attributed to continental ice?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reconstructed-climate-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "geological-evidence-and-correlation", "name": "Geological evidence and correlation", "description": "Connects ice-age interpretations to inspected records and evaluates agreement between them.", "rationale": "A plausible glacial interpretation needs evidence of glaciation, defensible dating and justified correlation across sites.", "layers": [ { "id": "glacial-evidence-diagnostics", "name": "Glacial evidence diagnostics", "description": "Assesses whether observations support glacial processes and what alternative explanations remain.", "findings": [ { "id": "observations-and-alternative-origins", "name": "Observations and alternative origins", "description": "Separates observed deposits, landforms or proxy signals from their interpretation as evidence of continental glaciation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which inspected sources document the observations used to infer glaciation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observations-and-alternative-origins-q01" }, { "text": "What alternative depositional processes, reworking or proxy ambiguities must be excluded or retained?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "observations-and-alternative-origins-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cross-record-correlation", "name": "Cross-record correlation", "description": "Evaluates whether geographically separated records support the same interval and phases.", "findings": [ { "id": "synchrony-and-record-independence", "name": "Synchrony and record independence", "description": "Records correlation methods and distinguishes independent agreement from shared chronological assumptions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What dating or stratigraphic evidence supports correlating these records within their age uncertainties?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "synchrony-and-record-independence-q01" }, { "text": "Which apparent agreements depend on shared age models or an assumption that the glacial events were synchronous?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "synchrony-and-record-independence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "explanation-and-reassessment", "name": "Explanation and reassessment", "description": "Tracks hypotheses for the glacial regime and the evidence needed to update its interpretation.", "rationale": "Recognising an ice age does not establish its cause, and agents need explicit grounds for retaining or revising claims.", "layers": [ { "id": "drivers-and-feedbacks", "name": "Drivers and feedbacks", "description": "Separates proposed initiating conditions, sustaining feedbacks and controls on shorter fluctuations.", "findings": [ { "id": "causal-hypothesis-support", "name": "Causal hypothesis support", "description": "Records competing explanations and the observations or modelling assumptions on which they depend.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which hypotheses address onset, persistence, internal fluctuations and termination respectively?", "kind": "definition", "id": "causal-hypothesis-support-q01" }, { "text": "What inspected evidence supports each hypothesis, and which links depend primarily on model assumptions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "causal-hypothesis-support-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-revision", "name": "Classification revision", "description": "Defines justified responses to new evidence or unresolved disagreement.", "findings": [ { "id": "revision-and-research-triggers", "name": "Revision and research triggers", "description": "Records what would justify changing the interval's classification, boundaries or reconstruction.", "questions": [ { "text": "What new observation would justify revising the proposed onset, termination, ice extent or ice-age classification?", "kind": "action", "id": "revision-and-research-triggers-q01" }, { "text": "Which targeted dating, field observation or proxy comparison would best distinguish the remaining interpretations?", "kind": "action", "id": "revision-and-research-triggers-q02" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which scientific definition should govern the registry entry, and how should narrower everyday uses of ice age be represented?", "What evidence of duration, geographic extent and ice persistence is sufficient for classification across geological periods with very different record quality?", "How should globally framed boundaries be assigned when regional glaciations begin or end at different times?", "When does an apparent interruption justify separate ice ages rather than phases within one enclosing interval?", "Which reviewed sources and correlation frameworks should anchor the first populated model, especially where proposed ancient glaciations remain disputed?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 10, "questions": 20 } }