{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:59:42Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d6-ea92-75f1-ae30-ffbf6cee39f8\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Czech Sign Language\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: ", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 75.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d6-ea95-7c52-8707-66ee5ebd577d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Czech Sign Language\nRegistry id: vr.tr.czech-sign-language\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:47:52+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:31+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q5201809", "registryId": "vr.tr.czech-sign-language", "name": "Czech Sign Language", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q5201809/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.czech-sign-language", "name": "Czech Sign Language", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise Czech Sign Language, assess evidence about its use and accessibility, and choose language resources or support appropriate to a particular signing community and task.", "definition": "Czech Sign Language is a natural visual-gestural language used by Deaf communities in Czechia, with its own grammar distinct from spoken Czech.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Czech Sign Language as a natural visual language and living community practice, including its linguistic identity, variation, transmission, documented use, and conditions for appropriate language support.", "in_scope": [ "Language identity, names, identifiers, and boundaries with signed representations of Czech and neighbouring sign languages", "Manual, nonmanual, spatial, and discourse features needed to recognise and describe Czech Sign Language", "Regional, generational, social, and situational variation among users", "Dated evidence about user populations, language acquisition, and intergenerational transmission", "Status and actual provision in education, public services, and interpreting", "Language documentation, annotation, and resource suitability" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Spoken and written Czech as a separate language", "Signed Czech and other manually coded representations of spoken languages as independent systems", "Slovak Sign Language and other neighbouring sign languages", "Hearing diagnoses, audiological treatment, and individual medical records", "Deaf organisations, schools, and interpreting providers as institutional entities", "Video platforms, recognition software, and notation systems as technical products" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify Czech Sign Language through linguistic evidence and community attribution; a Czech location or Czech citizenship does not establish the language being used.", "Distinguish Czech Sign Language from signed Czech by examining grammatical organisation, including nonmanual and spatial patterns, rather than merely recognising individual signs.", "Do not classify a sample as Czech Sign Language solely because it contains fingerspelled Czech words or Czech subtitles.", "Keep Czech Sign Language distinct from Slovak Sign Language unless evidence supports a narrower claim about contact, shared forms, or a particular user's repertoire.", "Treat Czech gloss labels, dictionary entries, and language codes as representations or identifiers, not as complete evidence of natural signing." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Identity and identifier attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Attested name or code, issuing authority, version or date, and scope of designation", "why_it_matters": "Allows resources to be matched without confusing Czech Sign Language with Czech or signed Czech." }, { "name": "Linguistic evidence profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented manual, nonmanual, spatial, and discourse features; evidence context; analysis confidence", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification beyond isolated vocabulary and exposes unsupported grammatical assumptions." }, { "name": "Variety and register attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source-described regional, generational, community, or situational variety; mixed or undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a local or teaching form from being treated as universally appropriate." }, { "name": "Estimated user population", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Persons, with reference year, geography, definition of user, method, and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Separates language-use estimates from hearing-status statistics and historical counts." }, { "name": "Acquisition and transmission conditions", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Source-described access to fluent signing, age of first exposure, acquisition setting, and continuity over time", "why_it_matters": "Shows whether learners can acquire and sustain the language through meaningful interaction." }, { "name": "Legal recognition and service entitlement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Language-to-instrument relationship, jurisdiction, effective date, named beneficiaries, and covered settings", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a documented legal provision from assumptions about universal service availability." }, { "name": "Task-specific language support availability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Available, constrained, unavailable, or unverified for a stated task, place, and date", "why_it_matters": "Connects language recognition to practical decisions about communication support." }, { "name": "Resource fitness", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Language attribution, variety coverage, signer participation, validation, recording completeness, licence, and permitted use", "why_it_matters": "Helps an agent choose resources suitable for learning, translation, analysis, or evaluation." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess whether a labelled resource actually documents Czech Sign Language and record uncertainty when evidence is insufficient.", "Select vocabulary and learning resources appropriate to a user's community, register, and task.", "Compare dated population and transmission evidence without merging incompatible definitions of users.", "Identify documented language-support requirements and verify practical provision for a particular setting.", "Assess whether recordings and annotations support a proposed linguistic or computational use.", "Route ambiguous or consequential language decisions to qualified Czech Sign Language users, researchers, or interpreters." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe Czech Sign Language, its grammar and status from reliable sources.", "Point people to qualified interpreters and Deaf organizations in Czechia." ], "must_not": [ "Confuse it with signed Czech, the system that follows spoken Czech word order.", "Interpret for Deaf people in courts, hospitals or official matters.", "Publish videos of signers without their consent." ], "requires_human": [ "Choosing an automated tool instead of an interpreter for a Deaf person's service." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Deaf people have a right to communicate in their own language.", "Signers are visible in every recording, so publishing them always identifies them." ], "affected_parties": [ "Deaf people in Czechia", "Interpreters", "Deaf children and their families" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The Deaf community that uses it; Czech law recognizes it as a language of the Deaf.", "master_systems": [] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "Czech Sign Language is used for everyday communication, education and cultural participation within Deaf communities in Czechia.", "It is also used in interpreting and accessible public services where users require communication in their own language." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "ISO 639-3, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, identifies Czech Sign Language with the language code cse.", "Act No. 155/1998 Coll. on the communication systems of deaf and deafblind persons, adopted by the Parliament of the Czech Republic and subsequently amended, provides a legal framework for its use." ], "visual_identification": [ "Communication combines manual signs with facial expression, gaze and spatial organization, although these features are shared with other sign languages.", "Natural signing uses its own grammatical organization rather than simply reproducing spoken Czech word order.", "Reliable identification requires recognizable vocabulary and grammatical patterns assessed by someone familiar with the language." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Confusing the language with manually coded Czech can produce inaccurate interpretation and inaccessible services.", "Assuming that sign languages are universal can lead to selection of unsuitable interpreters or resources.", "Obstructed views or poor video framing can remove essential hand, facial and spatial information.", "Unverified automated interpretation can distort meaning in consequential interactions." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q5201809: Czech Sign Language", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5201809", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Czech Sign Language", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_Sign_Language", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "language-identity-and-boundaries", "name": "Language identity and boundaries", "description": "Establishes what counts as Czech Sign Language and how external naming systems refer to it.", "rationale": "Country labels, Czech-language glosses, and manually coded Czech can otherwise produce false language matches.", "layers": [ { "id": "names-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "Records attested names and authority-specific identifiers without equating them with the language itself.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-language-designations", "name": "Attributed language designations", "description": "Require evidence for each Czech or international name and each catalogue designation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which names do Czech Sign Language communities and authoritative linguistic resources use, and in which contexts?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-language-designations-q01" }, { "text": "Which ISO 639, Glottolog, and Ethnologue designations apply, which code levels have no assignment, and what versions were checked?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-language-designations-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-systems", "name": "Neighbouring systems", "description": "Examines boundaries with signed Czech, contact signing, and other sign languages.", "findings": [ { "id": "language-versus-coded-czech", "name": "Language versus coded Czech", "description": "Ground classification in grammatical evidence, usage context, and community attribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence distinguishes Czech Sign Language from signed Czech in the sample or resource under review?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "language-versus-coded-czech-q01" }, { "text": "How should contact signing or material involving Slovak Sign Language be labelled without forcing an unsupported single-language classification?", "kind": "action", "id": "language-versus-coded-czech-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "visual-language-organisation", "name": "Visual language organisation", "description": "Captures the evidence needed to describe Czech Sign Language beyond lists of signs.", "rationale": "Recognition and interpretation require attention to simultaneous visual information and connected discourse.", "layers": [ { "id": "manual-and-nonmanual-patterns", "name": "Manual and nonmanual patterns", "description": "Examines sign formation and the contribution of the face, head, and body.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-form-contrasts", "name": "Documented form contrasts", "description": "Record contrasts supported by Czech Sign Language examples rather than importing analyses from another sign language.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which handshape, orientation, location, movement, and nonmanual contrasts are documented for Czech Sign Language?", "kind": "definition", "id": "documented-form-contrasts-q01" }, { "text": "Which recordings and analyses support distinguishing grammatical nonmanual marking from affect, mouthing, or individual performance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-form-contrasts-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "spatial-grammar-and-discourse", "name": "Spatial grammar and discourse", "description": "Examines how connected signing organises reference, events, perspective, and interaction.", "findings": [ { "id": "context-dependent-interpretation", "name": "Context-dependent interpretation", "description": "Preserve the discourse context needed to interpret spatial and sequential patterns.", "questions": [ { "text": "How do documented Czech Sign Language examples establish and maintain reference, express questions or negation, and represent another person's perspective?", "kind": "definition", "id": "context-dependent-interpretation-q01" }, { "text": "What surrounding video and annotation must be retained before a sign sequence can support a translation or grammatical claim?", "kind": "action", "id": "context-dependent-interpretation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "communities-variation-and-use", "name": "Communities, variation, and use", "description": "Locates Czech Sign Language use in particular communities and periods.", "rationale": "Neither a single population count nor a single dictionary adequately represents a living language community.", "layers": [ { "id": "user-populations", "name": "User populations", "description": "Qualifies estimates by what was counted, where, and when.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-user-estimates", "name": "Dated user estimates", "description": "Keep primary-language users, additional-language users, learners, and hearing-status populations analytically distinct.", "questions": [ { "text": "What dated estimates exist for Czech Sign Language users, and how does each source define and identify a user?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "dated-user-estimates-q01" }, { "text": "Do estimates include hearing signers, learners, or users outside Czechia, and can overlapping groups be separated?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dated-user-estimates-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "varieties-and-registers", "name": "Varieties and registers", "description": "Records variation and the authority behind claims of preferred or standard usage.", "findings": [ { "id": "situated-sign-choices", "name": "Situated sign choices", "description": "Attribute alternative forms to documented communities and contexts without ranking them by default.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which regional, generational, school-associated, or register differences have been documented, and by whom?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "situated-sign-choices-q01" }, { "text": "When a resource recommends a standard or specialist sign, who endorses it and what evidence supports its suitability for the intended users?", "kind": "action", "id": "situated-sign-choices-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "transmission-recognition-and-access", "name": "Transmission, recognition, and access", "description": "Connects language acquisition and institutional recognition to observed opportunities to use Czech Sign Language.", "rationale": "Legal naming, classroom provision, and actual access to fluent communication are separate conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "acquisition-and-education", "name": "Acquisition and education", "description": "Examines access to the language in families, peer networks, and educational settings.", "findings": [ { "id": "meaningful-language-exposure", "name": "Meaningful language exposure", "description": "Distinguish teaching Czech Sign Language, teaching through it, and using signed support for Czech.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence describes when and where children and adult learners gain sustained access to fluent Czech Sign Language users?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "meaningful-language-exposure-q01" }, { "text": "Does a reported educational programme teach through Czech Sign Language, teach it as a subject, or primarily use signed Czech?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "meaningful-language-exposure-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-and-service-provision", "name": "Recognition and service provision", "description": "Records applicable instruments and verifies communication support in concrete settings.", "findings": [ { "id": "entitlement-and-delivery", "name": "Entitlement and delivery", "description": "Attribute legal claims to current instruments and provision claims to dated operational evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which effective legal instruments name Czech Sign Language, and what rights, beneficiaries, and settings do their provisions cover?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "entitlement-and-delivery-q01" }, { "text": "For the intended appointment, lesson, or public service, how can suitable interpreting or direct Czech Sign Language communication be verified and arranged?", "kind": "action", "id": "entitlement-and-delivery-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "documentation-and-resource-use", "name": "Documentation and resource use", "description": "Assesses how Czech Sign Language is recorded, represented, and made usable for particular tasks.", "rationale": "Video, glosses, subtitles, and notation preserve different information and permit different conclusions.", "layers": [ { "id": "representation-and-annotation", "name": "Representation and annotation", "description": "Distinguishes the language from written labels and transcription conventions.", "findings": [ { "id": "representation-limits", "name": "Representation limits", "description": "Record what each notation or annotation preserves and omits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which writing, transcription, fingerspelling, or glossing conventions are actually used in the Czech Sign Language resource, and by which community or project?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "representation-limits-q01" }, { "text": "Which timing, spatial, nonmanual, or interactional information is lost when its signing is reduced to Czech glosses or subtitles?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "representation-limits-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "resource-validation-and-permissions", "name": "Resource validation and permissions", "description": "Evaluates dictionaries, corpora, teaching materials, and datasets for intended use.", "findings": [ { "id": "fit-for-purpose-evidence", "name": "Fit-for-purpose evidence", "description": "Require suitable coverage, community validation, and permissions before relying on or reusing material.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who supplied and validated the signing, which Czech Sign Language varieties and contexts are represented, and how were examples collected?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "fit-for-purpose-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Do recording quality, annotation coverage, participant consent, and licensing support the proposed learning, publication, translation, or model-training use?", "kind": "action", "id": "fit-for-purpose-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No speaker estimate is supplied: any count needs a date, source, method and distinction between native signers and other users.", "Current legal recognition and educational entitlements require checking the applicable Czech legislation.", "Regional variety names, historical relationships and mutual intelligibility with neighbouring sign languages require specialist verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "ISO 639-3", "value_or_pattern": "cse", "note": "Identifies Czech Sign Language; it does not identify spoken Czech or manually coded Czech." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Everyday communication within Deaf communities.", "Education through sign language.", "Interpreting between Czech Sign Language and spoken Czech.", "Signed storytelling, cultural performance and video communication." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating it as Czech vocabulary expressed with the hands obscures its independent grammar.", "Confusing Czech Sign Language with signed Czech can lead to inappropriate teaching or interpreting provision.", "Assuming sign languages are universal can make cross-language communication inaccessible.", "Ignoring facial expression, gaze and body movement loses grammatical and discourse information." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Usage includes regional and generational variation within Czechia; specific varieties and their boundaries require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Czech", "difference": "Czech is a spoken language with a written tradition; Czech Sign Language has an independent visual-gestural grammar." }, { "name": "Signed Czech", "difference": "Signed Czech manually represents Czech and follows its linguistic structure; Czech Sign Language is a natural language with its own grammar." }, { "name": "Slovak Sign Language", "difference": "It is separately identified and associated with Deaf communities in Slovakia; national proximity does not establish linguistic identity or mutual intelligibility." }, { "name": "Fingerspelling", "difference": "Fingerspelling represents letters manually and can be used within signed discourse; it is not a complete sign language." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Czech Sign Language this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which current authoritative identifier records and community-preferred names should anchor this entry, including any absent ISO code assignments?", "What is the strongest dated estimate of Czech Sign Language users, and how does it distinguish language use from hearing status?", "Which regional and generational varieties are adequately documented, and how broadly are proposed standard or specialist forms accepted?", "Which legal provisions currently apply to Czech Sign Language, and where does evidence establish gaps between entitlement and actual provision?", "Which grammatical descriptions, corpora, and dictionaries provide sufficient community validation, coverage, and permissions for the intended agent tasks?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }