{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:29:17Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094f2-06d0-75e1-b9d0-80ceec08a78e\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: encyclopedism\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 r", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 73.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094f2-06de-75c2-85d6-95642a1e93e1\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: encyclopedism\nRegistry id: vr.tr.encyclopedism\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:40:24+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:31+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q5375738", "registryId": "vr.tr.encyclopedism", "name": "encyclopedism", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q5375738/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.encyclopedism", "name": "encyclopedism", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, compare and assess projects or practices of encyclopedism by recording their ambitions for knowledge, organising commitments, editorial practices and acknowledged limits.", "definition": "Encyclopedism is the intellectual aspiration and practice of collecting, organizing, and presenting knowledge comprehensively, often through encyclopedic works and sometimes as part of a broader philosophical or educational program.", "scope_statement": "This model owns encyclopedism as an intellectual orientation and practice of gathering, organising and connecting knowledge across a declared breadth, while keeping competing meanings and historical uses of the term explicit.", "in_scope": [ "Attributed definitions of encyclopedism and the cases each definition admits", "Ambitions for comprehensive knowledge and the boundaries imposed on them", "Schemes for classifying, arranging and connecting fields of knowledge", "Practices of compilation, synthesis, attribution and editorial coordination", "Claims to authority, treatment of disagreement and mechanisms for revision", "Purposes and uses through which an encyclopedic project serves its intended public" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The full bibliographic, textual or technical description of an individual encyclopedia", "Personal erudition or polymathy without an associated encyclopedic orientation or practice", "Knowledge organisation systems considered independently of encyclopedic projects", "The factual content of every discipline represented in a compilation", "General publishing operations unrelated to encyclopedic scope or editorial commitments", "The complete history of an intellectual movement in which encyclopedism is only one component" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Ask whether the undertaking pursues coverage across an articulated range of knowledge; a miscellaneous collection does not establish encyclopedism merely by containing many topics.", "Ask whether selection, arrangement or cross-reference expresses a conception of how knowledge belongs together; alphabetical order alone neither establishes nor excludes encyclopedism.", "Distinguish a person's breadth of learning from a commitment to compiling, connecting or making broad knowledge available.", "Distinguish an encyclopedia as a particular work from encyclopedism as an orientation that may be expressed across works, institutions or practices.", "Do not infer adherence to a particular historical philosophical programme from comprehensive compilation alone; record the evidence connecting the two." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Attributed conception", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Broad intellectual orientation | compilation practice | historical programme | personal learning ideal | disputed or other attributed meaning; multiple values allowed", "why_it_matters": "Prevents distinct uses of encyclopedism from being treated as one settled definition." }, { "name": "Declared knowledge horizon", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Universal aspiration | bounded domain | practical repertoire | other stated horizon | unstated", "why_it_matters": "Makes comprehensiveness assessable against the undertaking's own declared boundaries." }, { "name": "Organising commitments", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Systematic classification | alphabetical access | thematic grouping | cross-reference network | mixed | other documented arrangement", "why_it_matters": "Shows how the project represents relationships between bodies of knowledge." }, { "name": "Knowledge integration", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Compilation | comparative presentation | synthesis | mixed | unclear", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes assembling accounts from reconciling or connecting them." }, { "name": "Coverage against declared plan", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Covered planned topics / total planned topics, with counting rules and assessment date; unknown when no defensible denominator exists", "why_it_matters": "Supports a bounded coverage assessment without pretending to measure all knowledge." }, { "name": "Editorial authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to people, institutions or communities that select, validate and organise contributions", "why_it_matters": "Locates responsibility for inclusion, exclusion and authoritative presentation." }, { "name": "Revision condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Planned | actively compiled | issued with revisions | continuously revised | closed | abandoned | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether gaps and corrections can enter an active editorial process." }, { "name": "Intended knowledge public", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to documented audiences, their languages, assumed preparation and access conditions", "why_it_matters": "Makes claims of general accessibility distinguishable from access for a restricted readership." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a candidate undertaking under an explicitly attributed meaning of encyclopedism and record contrary evidence.", "Compare comprehensive ambitions with documented coverage, omissions and exclusions.", "Trace how classification and cross-references connect or separate fields of knowledge.", "Identify who can select contributions, resolve editorial disputes and authorise revisions.", "Recommend documented additions, corrections or alternative viewpoints within the project's declared remit.", "Explain how an encyclopedic undertaking differs from an encyclopedia artifact, a specialist reference work or personal polymathy." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe encyclopedism, its history and its main works from cited sources.", "Compare encyclopedic projects by scope, method and authorship." ], "must_not": [ "Present an encyclopedia's claims as settled fact without checking sources.", "Copy encyclopedic content in breach of copyright or licence terms.", "Claim completeness for a collection that leaves out whole fields or peoples." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing new encyclopedic content generated by an agent under a public name." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Encyclopedias decide what counts as knowledge and whose knowledge is left out.", "Authority given to reference works makes their errors spread widely." ], "affected_parties": [ "Readers and students", "Contributors", "Communities misrepresented by omission" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the idea; each project's editors answer for its works.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Expressed in multi-volume works or large online collections organized alphabetically or by topic.", "Entries follow a uniform format with headwords and cross-references." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Errors in widely used reference works spread into other sources.", "Bias in what is included shapes public understanding." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Encyclopedism is encountered in intellectual history, educational programmes and projects that seek broad coverage of knowledge.", "It guides choices about subject coverage, classification, cross-references and the relationships between fields.", "The concept helps assess how a knowledge project defines completeness and acknowledges gaps or limits." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No formal standard or regulation directly governs encyclopedism as an intellectual outlook." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q5375738: encyclopedism", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5375738", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Encyclopedism", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedism", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "conceptions-and-boundaries", "name": "Conceptions and boundaries", "description": "Records what encyclopedism means in a particular attribution and why an undertaking qualifies.", "rationale": "The model must distinguish competing uses of the term before assessing instances.", "layers": [ { "id": "attributed-meanings", "name": "Attributed meanings", "description": "Separates participants' descriptions from later analytical classifications.", "findings": [ { "id": "meaning-and-attributor", "name": "Meaning and attributor", "description": "Record the definition being applied, who applies it, its historical setting and whether the label is self-ascribed or retrospective.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who calls this encyclopedism, and what commitments does that use of the term require?", "kind": "definition", "id": "meaning-and-attributor-q01" }, { "text": "Which passage or other evidence supports the attribution, and is it contemporary with the undertaking?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "meaning-and-attributor-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "instance-boundaries", "name": "Instance boundaries", "description": "Tests the difference between encyclopedism and related forms of broad learning or compilation.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-and-counterexamples", "name": "Qualification and counterexamples", "description": "Record evidence for qualification under the chosen definition, including cases that expose its limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "What makes this undertaking encyclopedism rather than merely a large collection, reference work or display of erudition?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "qualification-and-counterexamples-q01" }, { "text": "Would a comprehensive work confined to one discipline qualify under this definition, and why?", "kind": "definition", "id": "qualification-and-counterexamples-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "comprehensiveness-and-selection", "name": "Comprehensiveness and selection", "description": "Makes the ambition to encompass knowledge explicit and distinguishes that ambition from achieved coverage.", "rationale": "Breadth is meaningful only when the knowledge horizon and rules of inclusion can be examined.", "layers": [ { "id": "knowledge-horizon", "name": "Knowledge horizon", "description": "Captures the universe of knowledge the undertaking proposes to encompass.", "findings": [ { "id": "declared-totality", "name": "Declared totality", "description": "Record what counts as the intended whole, including limits of period, language, community, discipline and practical purpose.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does a claim such as all knowledge or comprehensive coverage mean in this undertaking's own terms?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declared-totality-q01" }, { "text": "Which limits are explicitly declared, and which are inferred from the contents?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "declared-totality-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "inclusion-and-omission", "name": "Inclusion and omission", "description": "Distinguishes deliberate exclusions, practical gaps and topics outside the declared remit.", "findings": [ { "id": "coverage-and-selection-rules", "name": "Coverage and selection rules", "description": "Record selection criteria and assess coverage against a documented plan or explicitly justified comparison set.", "questions": [ { "text": "What defensible list of expected topics permits coverage to be assessed without equating it with coverage of all knowledge?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "coverage-and-selection-rules-q01" }, { "text": "Which missing topics reflect editorial exclusion, unfinished work or an external expectation the project never adopted?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "coverage-and-selection-rules-q02" }, { "text": "Which additions would address demonstrated gaps within the undertaking's stated remit?", "kind": "action", "id": "coverage-and-selection-rules-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "architecture-of-knowledge", "name": "Architecture of knowledge", "description": "Records how an encyclopedic undertaking divides knowledge and makes relationships across those divisions available.", "rationale": "An encyclopedic arrangement can express substantive commitments about knowledge as well as support retrieval.", "layers": [ { "id": "divisions-and-order", "name": "Divisions and order", "description": "Examines the relationship between conceptual classification and the order in which material is encountered.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-and-access", "name": "Classification and access", "description": "Record divisions of knowledge, their stated justification and how they relate to the work's access arrangement.", "questions": [ { "text": "What principal divisions of knowledge does the undertaking recognise, and what justifies those divisions?", "kind": "definition", "id": "classification-and-access-q01" }, { "text": "Does the visible ordering express a theory of knowledge, provide convenient access or do both?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-and-access-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "connections-and-synthesis", "name": "Connections and synthesis", "description": "Examines whether contributions remain adjacent accounts or form an explicitly connected treatment.", "findings": [ { "id": "cross-domain-integration", "name": "Cross-domain integration", "description": "Record how cross-references, shared concepts or synthetic discussions relate bodies of knowledge, including contradictory connections.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented links explain relationships between fields rather than merely directing readers to another entry?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "cross-domain-integration-q01" }, { "text": "Where does the undertaking synthesise accounts, preserve incompatible accounts or leave their relationship unspecified?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cross-domain-integration-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "compilation-and-authority", "name": "Compilation and authority", "description": "Records how knowledge is gathered, transformed and authorised for encyclopedic presentation.", "rationale": "Broad coverage does not establish reliability; the model needs evidence of sourcing and editorial judgement.", "layers": [ { "id": "sources-and-transformation", "name": "Sources and transformation", "description": "Traces the route from prior works, testimony or investigation to compiled accounts.", "findings": [ { "id": "compilation-lineage", "name": "Compilation lineage", "description": "Record identifiable sources and distinguish quotation, abridgement, translation, synthesis and original contribution where evidence permits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sources can be traced for a representative account, and how has their content been transformed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "compilation-lineage-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes independent corroboration from several accounts repeating the same earlier source?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "compilation-lineage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "editorial-judgement", "name": "Editorial judgement", "description": "Locates authority over conflicting claims and the presentation of uncertainty.", "findings": [ { "id": "authority-and-disagreement", "name": "Authority and disagreement", "description": "Record who adjudicates contributions, the grounds of authority and whether disagreement remains visible to readers.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who decides between conflicting accounts, and what documented criteria support those decisions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authority-and-disagreement-q01" }, { "text": "How are contested claims, uncertain knowledge and competing schools represented?", "kind": "definition", "id": "authority-and-disagreement-q02" }, { "text": "What editorial response is available when an authoritative-looking account has weak or disputed support?", "kind": "action", "id": "authority-and-disagreement-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "public-purpose-and-renewal", "name": "Public purpose and renewal", "description": "Connects encyclopedic ambitions to intended readers, documented uses and the capacity to revise knowledge.", "rationale": "Assessment requires knowing whom the undertaking serves and how it responds when its represented knowledge changes.", "layers": [ { "id": "readers-and-programme", "name": "Readers and programme", "description": "Separates declared educational or social purposes from demonstrated reception.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-and-intended-effects", "name": "Access and intended effects", "description": "Record the intended public, barriers to access and any attributed educational, cultural or political programme without assuming those intentions were realised.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whom is the undertaking intended to equip with knowledge, and what language, cost or preparation requirements limit that access?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "access-and-intended-effects-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence supports its declared purposes, and which separate evidence shows how readers actually used it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "access-and-intended-effects-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "revision-and-continuity", "name": "Revision and continuity", "description": "Examines how a project maintains or relinquishes its claim to represent a changing body of knowledge.", "findings": [ { "id": "correction-and-expansion", "name": "Correction and expansion", "description": "Record revision mechanisms, their current availability and the relationship between successive editions or continuing versions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What process admits corrections, new fields or changed classifications, and who can initiate it?", "kind": "action", "id": "correction-and-expansion-q01" }, { "text": "When coverage or organising principles change, what makes the result a continuation of the same encyclopedic undertaking?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "correction-and-expansion-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The missing sense leaves unresolved whether this entry denotes encyclopedic activity generally or the French Enlightenment movement specifically.", "Historical varieties are not listed because there is no single settled taxonomy confidently recalled here.", "This account is based on recall; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of encyclopedism this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Guiding the compilation and organization of encyclopedias and other comprehensive reference works.", "Developing classifications that relate different branches of knowledge.", "Supporting educational programs that emphasize breadth across disciplines.", "Providing historians with a concept for comparing projects of knowledge collection and synthesis." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of encyclopedism this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Claims of completeness can conceal omissions and exclusions.", "Classification systems can present culturally specific assumptions as universal.", "Compilation can reproduce errors or inherited authorities without adequate criticism.", "Rapid changes in knowledge can make comprehensive accounts obsolete." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of encyclopedism this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In French intellectual history, encyclopédisme can refer specifically to the Enlightenment movement associated with Diderot, d'Alembert, and the Encyclopédie; broader usage includes encyclopedic projects from other periods.", "Applying the term across intellectual traditions requires care because the boundaries, purposes, and organization of comprehensive knowledge differ." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of encyclopedism this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "encyclopedia", "difference": "An encyclopedia is a reference work; encyclopedism is the aspiration, practice, or intellectual program that can inform its production." }, { "name": "polymathy", "difference": "Polymathy concerns a person's knowledge or competence across multiple fields; encyclopedism concerns comprehensive collection and organization of knowledge." }, { "name": "Enlightenment", "difference": "The Enlightenment is a broader historical formation; encyclopedism is one intellectual tendency associated with it and also occurs outside it." }, { "name": "classification of knowledge", "difference": "Classification establishes categories and relationships among fields; encyclopedism additionally seeks comprehensive collection or presentation of their contents." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of encyclopedism this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which meaning of encyclopedism does vr.tr.encyclopedism intend: an intellectual orientation, a compilation practice, a personal learning ideal or a particular historical programme?", "Which scholarly definitions and disagreements should establish the entry's boundaries, especially for comprehensive works limited to one discipline?", "What evidence should suffice to attribute encyclopedism retrospectively when participants did not use the term?", "How should the model recognise encyclopedic practices across different cultural traditions without assuming one tradition's divisions of knowledge are universal?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept, requiring this registry entry to link to it rather than receive a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 27 } }