{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T10:43:39Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09536-43d4-7010-b898-4f6dd718e31b\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: karve\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.LIV\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 registere", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 63.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09536-43c6-7e50-b349-a5858dbb04e8\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: karve\nRegistry id: vr.tr.karve\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext for " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:53:27+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:36:50+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "definition", "distinguishing_features", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "in_scope", "out_of_scope", "owners", "purpose", "scope_statement", "visual_identification" ], "answering_review": "2655589f5dce481ea2109a98eb3c7a4789989db1863657a62260e688bb9bb648" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q5750449", "registryId": "vr.tr.karve", "name": "karve", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q5750449/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.karve", "name": "karve", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise the karve ship type, explain its construction and historical uses, and distinguish archaeological evidence from interpretations and modern reconstructions.", "definition": "A karve is a type of relatively small Viking Age Scandinavian ship, built with overlapping hull planks and propelled by sail and oars, used for transport and other coastal activities.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the karve as a historical ship type, including hull construction, propulsion, transport roles and evidence for classification, while distinguishing the type from individual vessels and modern reconstructions.", "in_scope": [ "Historical terminology and evidence support identification of the karve ship type.", "Hull form and overlapping plank construction are relevant to the ship's classification.", "Sail and oar propulsion are features of the vessel type.", "Transport roles and coastal use form part of its historical context.", "Archaeological remains, depictions and reconstructions provide evidence of differing certainty." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Caraway and other botanical meanings of karve are outside this ship sense.", "Other historical ship types are outside scope except where comparison clarifies identification.", "Complete shipbuilding procedures and technical construction instructions are outside scope.", "Navigation instructions and decisions about operating a particular vessel are outside scope.", "A modern reconstruction's certification and seaworthiness require assessment beyond its historical type." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The name denotes a Scandinavian ship type rather than the plant called karve in Norwegian.", "Overlapping hull planks are characteristic but do not distinguish a karve from every other Viking Age ship.", "Classification considers hull proportions, size, propulsion and historical context together.", "The type accommodated transport roles and should not be identified solely by an assumed military purpose.", "A reconstruction illustrates an interpretation and does not establish every detail of historical construction." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Botanical identity and nomenclatural authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Provisional Carum carvi L.; accepted-name source, authority, publication date and verification date", "why_it_matters": "Anchors the working interpretation to botanical evidence; Kew lists Carum carvi L., but the registry mapping remains unconfirmed. [Kew Plants of the World Online](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn%3Alsid%3Aipni.org%3Anames%3A839677-1/general-information)" }, { "name": "Subject level", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "taxon | population | individual", "why_it_matters": "Prevents species-level statements from being treated as observations of a particular plant." }, { "name": "Identification confidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unresolved | provisional | verified; supporting characters, identifier and evidence", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent can proceed with propagation or collection recommendations." }, { "name": "Developmental and reproductive stage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "seed | seedling | vegetative rosette | bolting | flowering | immature fruit | mature fruit | senescent", "why_it_matters": "Determines which identification characters are available and which monitoring actions are timely." }, { "name": "Life-history form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "annual | biennial | other documented form | unknown; accession or cultivar evidence", "why_it_matters": "Avoids assuming that every plant follows an identical flowering schedule." }, { "name": "Fruit morphology", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "length and width in mm; curvature, rib pattern and maturity recorded categorically", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison with similar aromatic Apiaceae using observable structures." }, { "name": "Occurrence and establishment", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Coordinates, observation date and population; native | introduced | cultivated | escaped | uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Separates a planted specimen from evidence of a self-maintaining regional population." }, { "name": "Plant condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Vigour, wilting, discoloration, tissue damage and reproductive failure, with observation date", "why_it_matters": "Supports care decisions without converting nonspecific symptoms into unsupported diagnoses." }, { "name": "Conservation assessment", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Assessment body, geographic scope, category, assessment year and source; unknown if unverified", "why_it_matters": "Keeps regional protection and dated conservation assessments distinct from apparent local abundance." } ], "affordances": [ "Resolve the registry label against botanical evidence and flag conflicting interpretations.", "Compare a specimen with a regional identification key and request missing flowering or fruiting evidence.", "Track an identified plant through vegetative growth, flowering and fruit maturation.", "Distinguish cultivated occurrences from apparently self-recruiting populations.", "Choose observation, propagation or collection actions using identity, developmental stage and local constraints.", "Link harvested material to its source plant while handing processing and use to neighbouring models." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the karve as a historical Scandinavian ship type.", "Compare documented vessel features while marking uncertain classifications.", "Explain differences between surviving evidence and reconstructed features." ], "must_not": [ "Present botanical information about caraway as information about the ship type.", "Declare a vessel seaworthy from its appearance or historical classification.", "Present conjectural reconstruction details as established archaeological facts.", "Authorise disturbance or alteration of archaeological remains." ], "requires_human": [ "Decisions about operating or certifying a reconstruction require qualified human assessment.", "Conservation, excavation or alteration of archaeological remains requires authorised specialists." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Archaeological vessels and remains are cultural heritage that can be irreversibly damaged.", "Historical interpretation should make uncertainty and the limits of reconstruction explicit.", "Public demonstrations must account for the safety of crews, passengers and spectators." ], "affected_parties": [ "Researchers and conservators rely on accurate interpretation and preservation.", "Heritage communities and the public have interests in responsible representation.", "Crews, passengers and spectators can be affected by reconstruction safety." ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The responsible custodian stewards an artefact, and the owner or operator stewards a reconstruction, subject to applicable heritage and maritime requirements.", "master_systems": [ "Archaeological collection catalogues document relevant artefacts.", "Heritage records document protected remains and their custodianship.", "Vessel records document individual reconstructions where applicable." ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Depictions and reconstructions commonly show an open wooden hull with overlapping planks.", "A sail rig and positions for rowing are consistent with the type but are not unique identifiers.", "Visual resemblance alone is insufficient to distinguish a karve from related historical vessels." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misclassification can turn uncertain archaeological interpretations into misleading historical claims.", "Appearance or historical type alone cannot establish a reconstruction's seaworthiness.", "Unauthorised handling or alteration can damage archaeological remains.", "Operating a reconstruction without appropriate assessment can expose people to maritime hazards." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "In the supplied ship sense, a karve is a historical Scandinavian vessel associated with coastal travel and transport.", "The type is encountered in maritime archaeology, museum interpretation and reconstructed vessels used to study historical seafaring.", "This ship sense conflicts with the supplied plant definition and requires separate identification before catalogue use." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, adopted by the International Maritime Organization, applies to an operating reconstruction on the high seas and connected waters navigable by seagoing vessels." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q5750449: karve", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5750449", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Karve (ship)", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karve_%28ship%29", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "karve-identity", "name": "Karve identity", "description": "Resolve the undefined registry name and establish the botanical subject.", "rationale": "PHY.LIV supports an organism interpretation but does not prove that karve denotes caraway.", "layers": [ { "id": "name-resolution", "name": "Name resolution", "description": "Connect the registry label to evidence for its intended meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "caraway-working-interpretation", "name": "Caraway working interpretation", "description": "The draft treats karve as Carum carvi provisionally; the original registry source must confirm this mapping.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original registry or Wikidata record supplied the label karve?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "caraway-working-interpretation-q01" }, { "text": "Does that record identify the plant Carum carvi or a different referent?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "caraway-working-interpretation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "taxon-and-subject", "name": "Taxon and subject", "description": "Separate nomenclature from the individual or population under observation.", "findings": [ { "id": "anchored-botanical-subject", "name": "Anchored botanical subject", "description": "A usable record identifies both the taxonomic interpretation and the level at which observations apply.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which accepted-name authority, publication date, GBIF identifier and NCBI taxonomy identifier, if available, support the resolved taxon?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "anchored-botanical-subject-q01" }, { "text": "Is this statement about the species, a geographically delimited population or one tracked plant?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "anchored-botanical-subject-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "caraway-recognition", "name": "Caraway recognition", "description": "Assess the botanical evidence needed to recognise a candidate caraway plant.", "rationale": "Similar foliage and aromatic fruits make identification from names or isolated impressions unreliable.", "layers": [ { "id": "vegetative-evidence", "name": "Vegetative evidence", "description": "Record characters available before flowering.", "findings": [ { "id": "leaf-and-growth-form", "name": "Leaf and growth form", "description": "Vegetative observations support a candidate identification while retaining uncertainty when diagnostic organs are absent.", "questions": [ { "text": "What leaf division, attachment and growth form are visible in the specimen?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "leaf-and-growth-form-q01" }, { "text": "Which locally occurring Apiaceae remain plausible alternatives at this stage?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "leaf-and-growth-form-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "flowers-and-fruits", "name": "Flowers and fruits", "description": "Use reproductive structures to refine identification.", "findings": [ { "id": "reproductive-identification", "name": "Reproductive identification", "description": "Flowering and mature-fruit evidence should be evaluated together against an appropriate botanical key.", "questions": [ { "text": "What umbel structure, flower colour and mature-fruit dimensions, curvature and ribs are recorded?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reproductive-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Which key characters distinguish this specimen from cumin, fennel and relevant local lookalikes?", "kind": "definition", "id": "reproductive-identification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "development-and-recruitment", "name": "Development and recruitment", "description": "Track the plant's developmental trajectory and production of subsequent plants.", "rationale": "A vegetative rosette, flowering plant and newly recruited seedling require different interpretations and actions.", "layers": [ { "id": "seasonal-development", "name": "Seasonal development", "description": "Relate observed stages to accession history and growing conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "observed-life-history", "name": "Observed life history", "description": "Life-history form and flowering timing remain evidence-backed attributes rather than fixed assumptions from the common name.", "questions": [ { "text": "What sowing, emergence, overwintering and flowering dates are known for this plant or accession?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observed-life-history-q01" }, { "text": "Does the observed sequence support an annual or biennial life history, or is it still unresolved?", "kind": "definition", "id": "observed-life-history-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "fruiting-and-establishment", "name": "Fruiting and establishment", "description": "Distinguish flowering, fruit formation, viable propagules and successful recruitment.", "findings": [ { "id": "recruitment-evidence", "name": "Recruitment evidence", "description": "Visible fruit production alone does not establish viability or population replacement.", "questions": [ { "text": "What proportion of observed plants flowered, matured fruit and produced verified seedlings?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recruitment-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Should the next action be fruit-maturity monitoring, a documented germination check or seedling follow-up?", "kind": "action", "id": "recruitment-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "habitat-condition-and-intervention", "name": "Habitat, condition and intervention", "description": "Connect local occurrence and plant condition to justified management decisions.", "rationale": "A garden accession and a wild population differ in provenance, establishment evidence and appropriate intervention.", "layers": [ { "id": "local-population-context", "name": "Local population context", "description": "Record where the plants occur and what supports their local status.", "findings": [ { "id": "habitat-and-origin", "name": "Habitat and origin", "description": "Habitat observations and provenance are recorded separately from claims about native range.", "questions": [ { "text": "What light, soil moisture, drainage, vegetation competition and disturbance are observed at the site?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "habitat-and-origin-q01" }, { "text": "Which regional flora or occurrence history supports classifying this population as native, introduced, cultivated or escaped?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "habitat-and-origin-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "care-and-collection", "name": "Care and collection", "description": "Select proportionate actions for the identified plant and its local population.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-based-intervention", "name": "Evidence-based intervention", "description": "Care or collection decisions use observed condition, identification confidence and applicable population constraints.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observed symptoms justify further diagnosis or a change in care, and what evidence would distinguish competing causes?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-based-intervention-q01" }, { "text": "Before collection or propagation, what identity confirmation, local protection information and population-impact evidence are required?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-based-intervention-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The registry has no recorded sense; confirm that karve denotes the Norwegian plant name.", "Annual and biennial forms are cultivation distinctions, not necessarily formally recognized taxonomic subdivisions.", "Database identifiers, native-range boundaries and conservation assessments are omitted because they cannot be supplied confidently from recall." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Biennial caraway", "Annual caraway" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Botanical nomenclature", "value_or_pattern": "Carum carvi L.", "note": "L. identifies Carl Linnaeus as the author of the botanical name." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, adopted through International Botanical Congresses, governs the botanical name." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Fruits used to flavour bread, cheese and savoury dishes.", "Fruits used to flavour spirits such as aquavit.", "Essential oil extracted for flavouring." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Wild collection requires reliable identification because the Apiaceae family includes poisonous plants with superficially similar features." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Karve is a Norwegian name; caraway is the usual English name.", "The English culinary name black caraway can refer to other plants and should not be treated as an unambiguous synonym." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Cumin", "difference": "Cumin is Cuminum cyminum, a different species in Apiaceae, although both plants supply aromatic spice fruits." }, { "name": "Caraway fruits", "difference": "The spice consists of harvested reproductive structures; Carum carvi denotes the plant species." }, { "name": "Karve vessel", "difference": "Karve also names a historical Scandinavian boat type; the living-organism domain supports the plant interpretation." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of karve this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the original source for vr.tr.karve confirm Carum carvi, and does an existing Vercy world model already own that concept?", "What are the verified nomenclatural publication date, GBIF identifier and NCBI taxonomy identifier for the intended taxon?", "What native range, regional establishment records and dated IUCN or national assessments apply?", "Which annual or biennial forms and reproductive traits are relevant to the intended population, including whether any sex-related distinctions require modelling?", "Which regional identification key and diagnostic characters adequately separate karve from locally relevant Apiaceae lookalikes?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 16, "questions": 24 } }