{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T11:41:58Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.0127415, "turns": 1, "seconds": 163.3, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 78.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07ba9-fc14-73f2-8f6d-6712d367aadc\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Upanishads\nRegistry id: vr.tr.upanishads\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA V" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:02:28+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q6113985", "registryId": "vr.tr.upanishads", "name": "Upanishads", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q6113985/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.upanishads", "name": "Upanishads", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify Upanishadic texts and collections, assess the evidence for their identity and interpretation, and decide how they may be compared, cited, translated, or reused.", "definition": "The Upanishads are the historically layered concluding (vedānta) stratum of Vedic śruti: Sanskrit texts transmitted inside named recensional schools (śākhās) that treat knowledge of ātman and brahman as the means of liberation, and that later Vedānta systems take as their primary scripture.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the Upanishads as a registered textual corpus, including evidence for membership, work boundaries, textual forms, interpretive differences, and the conditions governing responsible use of particular witnesses and editions.", "in_scope": [ "Corpus membership claims and the authorities or traditions supporting them", "Individual Upanishads, alternate titles, internal divisions, and relationships to collections", "Relationships among manuscripts, recensions, editions, translations, and passages", "Textual evidence for teachings, dialogues, interpretive claims, and disagreements", "Evidence quality and constraints affecting citation, comparison, translation, and reuse" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The complete Vedic corpus beyond relationships needed to identify or contextualise an Upanishad", "Comprehensive models of philosophical schools that interpret Upanishadic texts", "Independent biographies of attributed authors, speakers, commentators, or translators", "Material conservation and ownership histories of manuscript objects beyond relevant provenance links", "Religious institutions, practitioners, and ritual activities as independently managed entities" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An Upanishad membership claim must identify supporting evidence or an explicitly named authority; discussion of similar philosophical themes alone does not establish membership.", "A commentary, translation, or anthology must be distinguishable from the Upanishadic work or passage it presents.", "An individual Upanishad must be distinguishable from a collection bearing an Upanishads title; collection membership must not silently establish universal corpus boundaries.", "Shared titles or overlapping passages must trigger a work-identity check rather than automatic merging of textual forms.", "A claim about the whole corpus must be distinguishable from a teaching attributed to one passage, speaker, text, or interpretive tradition." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Unit represented", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "corpus | collection | work | recension | witness | edition | translation | passage", "why_it_matters": "Determines what identification, comparison, and citation operations are meaningful." }, { "name": "Membership assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported within a named authority | contested | unverified | excluded within a named authority", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from treating one collection or tradition as the undisputed boundary of the Upanishads." }, { "name": "Title correspondence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "attested title, language or script, spelling variant, and proposed corresponding work", "why_it_matters": "Supports discovery while keeping uncertain title matches visible." }, { "name": "Vedic affiliation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "claimed Veda, branch, or enclosing textual context, with evidence and qualification", "why_it_matters": "Helps identify the text and contextualise affiliation without confusing it with independently established composition history." }, { "name": "Textual completeness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "complete relative to a named reference | fragmentary | excerpted | reconstructed | undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Limits conclusions drawn from missing or selectively presented material." }, { "name": "Passage alignment coverage", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "percentage of a declared passage set aligned between specified textual forms, with alignment method", "why_it_matters": "Shows how much of a proposed comparison can be checked directly." }, { "name": "Historical attribution status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "traditional attribution recorded | research attribution supported | disputed | undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Keeps traditional attribution, historical composition claims, and narrative speakers distinct." }, { "name": "Interpretive dependence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "claim linked to passage, textual form, translation, commentator, or interpretive tradition", "why_it_matters": "Makes the basis and limits of an interpretation inspectable." }, { "name": "Reuse assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "permitted for specified use | permission required | restricted | undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Separates the status of an underlying text from that of a particular translation, edition, image, or recording." } ], "affordances": [ "Resolve a title or quotation to candidate Upanishads while retaining ambiguous matches.", "Evaluate corpus membership against a declared collection, authority, or research criterion.", "Align passages across textual forms and expose variants that affect interpretation.", "Compare interpretations with explicit links to passages and interpretive sources.", "Prepare edition-specific citations and clearly labelled translations or paraphrases.", "Determine whether a particular textual resource supports a proposed quotation, publication, or computational use." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Quote and explain the Upanishads, naming the text, recension and translation used.", "Present different traditions of interpretation, such as the schools of Vedanta, fairly." ], "must_not": [ "Mock or trivialize the Upanishads or the communities that hold them sacred.", "Present one sectarian or modern reading as the only meaning.", "Invent verses or attribute quotations to the Upanishads without a source.", "Use the texts to justify caste discrimination or hatred." ], "requires_human": [ "Settling contested questions of authenticity or interpretation in published material." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "The Upanishads are sacred scripture for many Hindus and deserve respect.", "Selective quotation has been used both for nationalism and for exclusion." ], "affected_parties": [ "Hindu communities", "Scholars and students", "Readers of translations" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the texts; living traditions and their teachers transmit them.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misattributed quotations spread widely online.", "Commercial use can misrepresent sacred content." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "These texts are encountered in Hindu scriptural study, oral recitation and philosophical teaching.", "They are used to explore the self, ultimate reality, knowledge and liberation within several interpretive traditions.", "Scholarly work compares recensions, commentaries and translations to investigate their language, transmission and reception." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "ISO 15919, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, provides transliteration conventions applicable to editions written in Devanagari and related Indic scripts." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "recognition": "The textual corpus has no fixed visual appearance that distinguishes it across manuscripts, scripts, printed editions and translations." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "olivelle-1998", "title": "The Early Upanishads: Annotated Text and Translation", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Critical Sanskrit text, translation, dating discussion, recensions, and the scholarly core of the principal Upanishads (Oxford University Press, 1998)." }, { "id": "olivelle-1996", "title": "Upaniṣads (Oxford World's Classics)", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Accessible annotated translations and introduction on canon, chronology, and ātman-brahman teaching (Oxford University Press, 1996)." }, { "id": "radhakrishnan-1953", "title": "The Principal Upanishads", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Standard Indian philosophical edition of the principal texts with commentary in the Vedānta tradition (George Allen & Unwin, 1953)." }, { "id": "deussen-1906", "title": "The Philosophy of the Upanishads", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Classic systematic account of Upanishadic doctrine and its relation to later Vedānta (T. & T. Clark, English ed. 1906)." }, { "id": "britannica-upanishad", "title": "Upanishad", "url": "https://www.britannica.com/topic/Upanishad", "what_it_supports": "Reference overview of the corpus, principal titles, Vedic affiliation, and role in Hindu philosophy (Encyclopaedia Britannica).", "url_status": "blocked" }, { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q6113985: Upanishads", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6113985", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Upanishads", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upanishads", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "corpus-membership-and-identity", "name": "Corpus membership and identity", "description": "Establishes what the registered Upanishads entry includes and how its constituent works are recognised.", "rationale": "An agent needs explicit membership and identity criteria before treating texts as instances of this corpus.", "layers": [ { "id": "membership-authorities", "name": "Membership authorities", "description": "Records the basis and limits of a text's inclusion among the Upanishads.", "findings": [ { "id": "situated-membership", "name": "Situated membership", "description": "Membership is assessed against identified evidence rather than inferred solely from a title or subject.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which collection, catalogue, textual attestation, or tradition identifies this work as an Upanishad?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "situated-membership-q01" }, { "text": "Does that evidence establish membership within one named collection or support a broader claim?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "situated-membership-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-title-boundaries", "name": "Work and title boundaries", "description": "Separates alternate names, distinct works, excerpts, and collection titles.", "findings": [ { "id": "title-to-work-resolution", "name": "Title-to-work resolution", "description": "Title matching remains distinguishable from demonstrated textual identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What incipit, colophon, passage sequence, or catalogue evidence identifies the work behind this title?", "kind": "definition", "id": "title-to-work-resolution-q01" }, { "text": "Do differently titled resources represent the same work, related textual forms, or distinct works?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "title-to-work-resolution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "vedic-context-and-historical-evidence", "name": "Vedic context and historical evidence", "description": "Connects Upanishadic works to their claimed textual settings and qualified historical accounts.", "rationale": "Affiliation, narrative setting, traditional attribution, and historical dating answer different questions and must remain distinguishable.", "layers": [ { "id": "textual-affiliation", "name": "Textual affiliation", "description": "Examines connections to a Veda, branch, or enclosing textual work.", "findings": [ { "id": "affiliation-evidence", "name": "Affiliation evidence", "description": "An affiliation claim carries its supporting source and the kind of relationship asserted.", "questions": [ { "text": "What source supports the claimed Vedic or branch affiliation of this Upanishad?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "affiliation-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Is the relationship textual embedding, transmitted association, or a later classification?", "kind": "definition", "id": "affiliation-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "composition-and-attribution", "name": "Composition and attribution", "description": "Qualifies claims about composition, redaction, attribution, and attestation.", "findings": [ { "id": "historical-claim-separation", "name": "Historical claim separation", "description": "Historical assessments specify which textual stage or attributed role they concern.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the proposed date concern composition, redaction, a surviving witness, or a documented citation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "historical-claim-separation-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports the date or attribution, and which competing assessments remain unresolved?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "historical-claim-separation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "textual-transmission-and-passages", "name": "Textual transmission and passages", "description": "Makes the wording, extent, and location of Upanishadic passages traceable across textual resources.", "rationale": "Recognition and interpretation depend on knowing which text is being read and whether another resource presents the same passage.", "layers": [ { "id": "witnesses-and-editorial-decisions", "name": "Witnesses and editorial decisions", "description": "Distinguishes transmitted readings from editorial reconstruction and incomplete evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "reading-support", "name": "Reading support", "description": "A quoted reading can be traced to a witness or edition and assessed for relevant uncertainty.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which witness or edition supplies this reading, and what textual basis does it disclose?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reading-support-q01" }, { "text": "Are missing passages, conjectural restorations, or variant readings material to the proposed interpretation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reading-support-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "passage-addressing-and-alignment", "name": "Passage addressing and alignment", "description": "Resolves divisions and numbering across editions, recensions, and translations.", "findings": [ { "id": "verifiable-passage-correspondence", "name": "Verifiable passage correspondence", "description": "Passage correspondence is checked through textual content and declared reference conventions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which division and numbering system locates this passage, and what wording disambiguates it?", "kind": "definition", "id": "verifiable-passage-correspondence-q01" }, { "text": "How much of the selected passage corresponds across the compared resources, including omissions or additions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "verifiable-passage-correspondence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "teachings-and-interpretive-accountability", "name": "Teachings and interpretive accountability", "description": "Connects statements about Upanishadic teachings to their textual and interpretive contexts.", "rationale": "An agent must avoid converting a speaker's statement, translation choice, or school's reading into an unqualified doctrine of the entire corpus.", "layers": [ { "id": "speakers-and-teaching-context", "name": "Speakers and teaching context", "description": "Examines the role of dialogue, instruction, objection, and surrounding passages.", "findings": [ { "id": "context-bound-teaching-claims", "name": "Context-bound teaching claims", "description": "A teaching claim specifies who speaks, what is asserted, and the textual extent supporting the reading.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who presents this statement, to whom, and is it instruction, a question, an objection, or a reported position?", "kind": "definition", "id": "context-bound-teaching-claims-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence justifies extending this statement beyond its passage to the work or wider Upanishadic corpus?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "context-bound-teaching-claims-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "terms-translations-and-commentaries", "name": "Terms, translations, and commentaries", "description": "Makes interpretations of terms such as ātman and brahman inspectable at the passage level.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretation-source-links", "name": "Interpretation source links", "description": "Meaning claims retain the wording and interpretive sources on which they depend.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does this translation or commentary interpret the relevant term in this particular passage?", "kind": "definition", "id": "interpretation-source-links-q01" }, { "text": "Which textual, grammatical, or commentarial evidence supports that reading and any recorded alternatives?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "interpretation-source-links-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "citation-translation-and-permitted-use", "name": "Citation, translation, and permitted use", "description": "Governs agent actions involving Upanishadic quotations, translations, excerpts, and digital resources.", "rationale": "Useful action requires accurate attribution, visible interpretive choices, and a resource-specific assessment of reuse conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "faithful-textual-presentation", "name": "Faithful textual presentation", "description": "Preserves distinctions between source wording, translation, paraphrase, and explanatory additions.", "findings": [ { "id": "quotation-and-translation-readiness", "name": "Quotation and translation readiness", "description": "A proposed presentation identifies its source passage and discloses transformations affecting meaning.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can the quotation be verified against a named edition and passage rather than an unattributed saying?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "quotation-and-translation-readiness-q01" }, { "text": "What attribution and labelling are needed for an existing translation, an agent-produced translation, or a paraphrase?", "kind": "action", "id": "quotation-and-translation-readiness-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "resource-access-and-reuse", "name": "Resource access and reuse", "description": "Assesses the conditions applying to the particular edition, translation, scan, or recording being used.", "findings": [ { "id": "use-specific-eligibility", "name": "Use-specific eligibility", "description": "Reuse decisions refer to the selected resource and proposed action rather than the age of the underlying work alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "What licence, rights statement, or access condition applies to this specific resource?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "use-specific-eligibility-q01" }, { "text": "Do the documented conditions support the proposed quotation, redistribution, adaptation, or computational processing?", "kind": "action", "id": "use-specific-eligibility-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Mukhya (principal) Upanishads: the ten, or sometimes thirteen, early texts that carry classical bhāṣya, especially Śaṅkara's", "Early prose Upanishads (notably Bṛhadāraṇyaka and Chāndogya, with Taittirīya, Aitareya, Kauṣītaki)", "Middle-period metrical Upanishads (Katha, Īśā, Muṇḍaka, Praśna, Māṇḍūkya, Śvetāśvatara and close kin)", "Yoga Upanishads", "Sannyāsa Upanishads", "Sectarian theistic Upanishads (Śaiva, Vaiṣṇava, Śākta)", "Minor texts of the South Indian Muktikā list of 108", "Recension-bound versions of the same title (especially Kāṇva vs Mādhyandina of the White Yajurveda)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Wikidata", "value_or_pattern": "Q10125", "note": "Item for the Upanishads as a textual corpus; individual titles have separate Q-ids." }, { "scheme": "Library of Congress Subject Headings", "value_or_pattern": "Upanishads", "note": "Uniform-title / topical heading used in library cataloguing of the corpus and of individual texts." }, { "scheme": "Muktikā canon number", "value_or_pattern": "1-108", "note": "Traditional South Indian serialisation of 108 named Upanishads given in the Muktikā Upaniṣad." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "No ISO, statutory, or intergovernmental standard defines the Upanishads as a class of object.", "Daśopaniṣad (ten principal Upanishads): de facto commentarial canon of Ādi Śaṅkara and of Advaita Vedānta teaching lineages.", "Muktikā list of 108 Upanishads: traditional South Indian Vedānta canon framed in the Muktikā Upaniṣad, not a modern standards body.", "Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (Government of India): the ancient Sanskrit works are in the public domain; modern translations, notes, and critical editions remain copyrightable." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Oral and manuscript transmission inside Vedic pāṭhaśālās and śākhā lineages, including liturgical recitation of texts such as the Īśāvāsya in White Yajurveda practice.", "Root scripture for Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, Dvaita and other Vedānta schools, read with bhāṣya in maṭhas and ashrams.", "University and Indological study of early Indian philosophy, language, and religion.", "Sannyāsa and some upanayana-related instruction, where selected mantras and sannyāsa Upanishads are taught.", "Global print and digital market of translations used in yoga, Vedānta, and comparative-religion teaching." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Texts in a working canon", "typical_range": "10-13 principal; 108 in the Muktikā list", "unit": "named texts" }, { "quantity": "Scholarly date-range of the early core", "typical_range": "c. 800-300 BCE (later sectarian titles continue into the 2nd millennium CE)", "unit": "years (BCE/CE)" }, { "quantity": "Length of the Īśā Upanishad", "typical_range": "17-18", "unit": "verses (mantras)" }, { "quantity": "Extant recensions of the Bṛhadāraṇyaka (and Īśā)", "typical_range": "2 (Kāṇva and Mādhyandina)", "unit": "recensions" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Pseudepigraphic inflation: late works titled 'X-upaniṣad' to claim Vedic śruti authority.", "Anachronism: reading Yoga, Tantric, or sectarian Upanishads as evidence for early Vedic-period doctrine.", "Recension mix-ups (Kāṇva/Mādhyandina) in editions, translations, and citations.", "Manuscript loss, interpolation, and editorial contamination of the Sanskrit text.", "Popular flattening of a layered, school-bound corpus into a single 'Hindu bible'." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "South Indian Advaita maṭhas commonly treat the Muktikā 108 as the closed canon; North Indian and most academic usage means the 10-13 principal texts.", "White Yajurveda recensions: Kāṇva (strong in parts of western and southern India; often the base of modern critical editions) vs Mādhyandina (north/central India).", "Living śākhā recitation vs. the Western book-trade packaging of 'the 108 Upanishads' as a fixed English set.", "Commentarial and manuscript traditions differ across Sanskrit, Tamil Vedānta, and Himalayan/Newar collections." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Vedic Saṃhitās", "difference": "Same śākhā, different genre and layer: mantra hymn collections, not the jñāna prose/verse that closes the fourfold Veda (Saṃhitā-Brāhmaṇa-Āraṇyaka-Upaniṣad)." }, { "name": "Brāhmaṇas", "difference": "Ritual theology of yajña procedure and meaning; Upanishads shift the centre to mokṣa via ātman-brahman knowledge." }, { "name": "Āraṇyakas", "difference": "Forest-book ritual texts in which many early Upanishads are embedded or to which they are appended; the Upanishad is the esoteric-knowledge close, not the whole āraṇyaka." }, { "name": "Bhagavad Gītā", "difference": "Often self-styled an upaniṣad in colophons, but it is Mahābhārata smṛti, not Vedic śruti and not attached to a Vedic śākhā." }, { "name": "Brahmasūtra (Vedānta-sūtra)", "difference": "Bādarāyaṇa's sūtra systematisation of Upanishadic claims, not itself an Upanishad." }, { "name": "Purāṇas", "difference": "Later narrative theistic smṛti in a different register; not śruti and not part of a Vedic recension." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Upanishads this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which membership authorities and collections should anchor the initial corpus coverage, and how should their disagreements be represented?", "Which similarly titled texts require separate work identities, and which are alternate titles or textual forms of one work?", "Which editions and witness catalogues provide a sufficiently documented basis for passage alignment and variant assessment?", "Which historical affiliations, dates, and attributions remain disputed after source review?", "Which translations and interpretive traditions should be represented initially to make consequential disagreements visible?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }