{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:16:59Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094e6-c7f1-7033-82a9-2cf5ff3441da\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: documentary theatre\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: ", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 72.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094e6-c7e2-76a3-8e7a-6afb43917276\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: documentary theatre\nRegistry id: vr.tr.documentary-theatre\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:40:24+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q634138", "registryId": "vr.tr.documentary-theatre", "name": "documentary theatre", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q634138/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.documentary-theatre", "name": "documentary theatre", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise documentary theatre, assess how a production turns documentary material into performance, and identify justified actions concerning evidence, representation and reuse.", "definition": "Documentary theatre is theatre that uses identifiable records of actual people, events or conditions as substantive material for performance, while selecting, arranging and interpreting that material through theatrical means.", "scope_statement": "This model owns documentary theatre as a theatrical practice and creative form, including how particular works and productions select, transform, perform and frame documentary material as accounts of actual people, events or conditions.", "in_scope": [ "A work's documentary claim and the limits it places on that claim", "The provenance, selection and contestation of documents, testimony and other evidentiary material", "Dramaturgical transformations connecting source material to scripts and performances", "The representation of actual people through performers, recordings or self-performance", "Permissions, participant relationships and production-specific safeguards", "Audience-facing disclosure, challenges and corrections to documentary claims" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General theatre production logistics, venue management and technical stagecraft", "Documentary film and other documentary media without a theatrical instance", "Historical fiction whose factual background does not establish a documentary claim", "Archival collection management beyond the materials used by a work", "The complete biographies or histories of represented people and events", "General legal doctrine concerning copyright, privacy or defamation" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Ask whether documentary material is constitutive of the work's account of actuality, rather than merely background research for an invented story.", "Ask what relationship the work asserts between performed statements and identifiable testimony, records or other source material; classify an unexplained relationship as unresolved.", "Distinguish verbatim practice by its stated commitment to source wording; do not require every documentary theatre work to make that commitment.", "Distinguish a documentary theatrical work from a lecture or evidence presentation by examining how it organises performance, roles, bodies, space and spectatorship.", "Do not exclude a work solely because it uses reconstruction, composite characters or invented passages; examine whether those transformations and their relationship to the documentary claim are disclosed." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Documentary claim", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Production's stated claim, such as testimony-based account, archival reconstruction, inquiry or contested interpretation; multiple values permitted", "why_it_matters": "Defines what the audience is being asked to accept and what evidence would support or challenge it." }, { "name": "Source-to-performance traceability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Traceable, partially traceable, untraceable or unassessed, recorded per passage or sequence", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to distinguish documented transformations from unsupported attribution." }, { "name": "Source basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Interviews, official records, correspondence, recordings, journalism, personal archives, other identified material; multiple values permitted", "why_it_matters": "Different materials require different checks on provenance, context and representativeness." }, { "name": "Transformation method", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Quotation, omission, rearrangement, translation, paraphrase, reconstruction, composite construction or invention; recorded per segment", "why_it_matters": "Shows how the performed account differs from its documentary basis." }, { "name": "Speaker-performer relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Source speaker linked to self-performance, another performer, a recording, a composite role or an undisclosed role", "why_it_matters": "Makes attribution and the consequences of embodiment inspectable." }, { "name": "Documentary disclosure", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Explicit before performance, explicit during performance, available in accompanying material, absent or unknown; recorded by disclosure topic", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes what creators know about the construction from what audiences can discover." }, { "name": "Permission and participation conditions", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented, conditional, disputed, absent or unknown, with the permitted uses and affected parties identified", "why_it_matters": "Supports decisions about performing, revising, recording or reusing particular contributions." }, { "name": "Documentary review status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unreviewed, checked against sources, challenged, revised or unresolved; recorded per claim and production version", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the credibility of one passage or version from being assumed for the entire work." } ], "affordances": [ "Map performed passages to documentary sources and identify missing or disputed links.", "Compare source material with a script or performance to expose consequential editing and reconstruction.", "Assess whether audience-facing descriptions match the work's actual documentary methods.", "Identify segments requiring attribution checks, participant consultation or permission review before a specified use.", "Trace how casting, delivery and staging alter the apparent authority or meaning of testimony.", "Prepare a version-specific correction or revision while preserving the history of the documentary claim." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe documentary theatre works, their sources and their creators from cited reviews and archives.", "Distinguish verbatim source material from scenes written or arranged by the company." ], "must_not": [ "Present a theatrical arrangement as an unedited record of events.", "Use real people's words or stories in a script without the consent or legal basis the production requires.", "Reveal the identity of a source who spoke on condition of anonymity.", "Misattribute statements to real people." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing scripts or recordings that include testimony from identifiable living people.", "Staging material about victims of recent violence or ongoing legal cases." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Real people's testimony is used on stage; consent, accuracy and dignity are at stake.", "Selection and arrangement shape public memory of contested events." ], "affected_parties": [ "People whose words are used", "Victims and their families", "Audiences" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The company or author who stages it; sources keep rights in their own words.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Performances often show projected documents, recordings or photographs alongside actors.", "Programmes credit interviews, transcripts or archives as sources.", "Actors may speak directly to the audience as identified real people." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Edited testimony can distort what people said.", "Exposure of participants can lead to harassment or legal claims." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Documentary theatre is encountered in theatres, festivals, schools and community settings where performances examine actual people, events or social conditions.", "Practitioners use interviews, testimony, archives and other records to support public discussion, historical interpretation and accounts of lived experience." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization, provides an international copyright framework relevant to protected texts and dramatic works used in productions." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q634138: documentary theatre", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q634138", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Documentary theatre", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_theatre", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "documentary-contract", "name": "Documentary contract", "description": "The work's account of what is actual, what is constructed and what spectators are invited to believe.", "rationale": "An agent cannot assess documentary adequacy without identifying the particular claim a work makes.", "layers": [ { "id": "claimed-actuality", "name": "Claimed actuality", "description": "The people, events or conditions the work presents as belonging to the actual world.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-and-limits", "name": "Claim and limits", "description": "Record the production's documentary claim, who makes it and any explicit limits on completeness or certainty.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this work claim to document, and where do its creators state that claim?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claim-and-limits-q01" }, { "text": "Which scenes or assertions fall outside that claim through invention, speculation or acknowledged uncertainty?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "claim-and-limits-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "form-boundaries", "name": "Form boundaries", "description": "The relationship between documentary theatre and adjacent theatrical or documentary practices.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-basis", "name": "Classification basis", "description": "Record why documentary theatre is an appropriate classification and whether narrower method labels apply.", "questions": [ { "text": "What makes documentary material structurally necessary to this work rather than background for historical fiction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Does the work claim a verbatim method, and exactly which material and transformations does that claim cover?", "kind": "definition", "id": "classification-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "documentary-evidence", "name": "Documentary evidence", "description": "The provenance, context and selection of the material from which the performance constructs its account.", "rationale": "Documentary authority depends on inspectable relationships to sources, including the limits of those sources.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-lineage", "name": "Source lineage", "description": "The path from a source's creation or collection to the version used in the production.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-identity-and-context", "name": "Source identity and context", "description": "Record source origin, available versions and contextual information needed to interpret an excerpt.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who created or supplied each source, when and under what circumstances?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-identity-and-context-q01" }, { "text": "Which recording, transcript, translation or document version supports each performed excerpt?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-identity-and-context-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "selection-and-disagreement", "name": "Selection and disagreement", "description": "How the production chooses among available accounts and treats gaps or contradictions.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidentiary-selection", "name": "Evidentiary selection", "description": "Record the selection rationale without equating inclusion with truth or omission with irrelevance.", "questions": [ { "text": "How were interviewees and documents selected, and which relevant perspectives were unavailable or excluded?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidentiary-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Where sources conflict, does the performance preserve the disagreement, choose an account or leave the matter unresolved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidentiary-selection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "document-to-dramaturgy", "name": "Document to dramaturgy", "description": "The transformations through which documentary material becomes a theatrical sequence.", "rationale": "Accurate quotation alone cannot establish whether editing, juxtaposition or reconstruction preserves the meaning claimed by a production.", "layers": [ { "id": "textual-transformation", "name": "Textual transformation", "description": "Changes to source wording, attribution and context in the script or performance score.", "findings": [ { "id": "passage-transformation", "name": "Passage transformation", "description": "Record consequential omissions, translations, rearrangements and combinations at the passage level.", "questions": [ { "text": "What changed between the source and the performed passage, including surrounding questions or qualifying language that was removed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "passage-transformation-q01" }, { "text": "Does the transformed passage imply a position, exchange or certainty that its source does not support?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "passage-transformation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "constructed-scenes", "name": "Constructed scenes", "description": "The use of reconstruction, composites and theatrical arrangement to connect documentary fragments.", "findings": [ { "id": "construction-and-inference", "name": "Construction and inference", "description": "Record where theatrical construction supplies actions, relationships or causal connections absent from the sources.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which encounters, characters, timings or causal links are reconstructed or combined rather than directly documented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "construction-and-inference-q01" }, { "text": "What disclosure or revision is needed if spectators could reasonably mistake this construction for a documented occurrence?", "kind": "action", "id": "construction-and-inference-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "embodied-testimony", "name": "Embodied testimony", "description": "How performers and media make documentary voices present, and how represented people participate in that process.", "rationale": "Theatre adds bodies, delivery and relationships that can change the meaning and consequences of documentary material.", "layers": [ { "id": "voice-and-presence", "name": "Voice and presence", "description": "The relationship between an originating speaker and the person or medium presenting that speaker's words.", "findings": [ { "id": "performed-attribution", "name": "Performed attribution", "description": "Record speaker-performer mappings and performance choices affecting the apparent credibility or identity of a voice.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who originally spoke these words, who presents them now, and how is that relationship made legible to spectators?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "performed-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "How do accent, gesture, casting, recorded playback or live delivery frame the speaker as credible, vulnerable, comic or suspect?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "performed-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "participant-relationships", "name": "Participant relationships", "description": "The conditions under which testimony and identifiable lives become performance material.", "findings": [ { "id": "participation-and-reuse", "name": "Participation and reuse", "description": "Record agreements, expectations and unresolved concerns for the specific contribution and proposed use.", "questions": [ { "text": "What was agreed about attribution, anonymity, editing, review, withdrawal and subsequent recording or touring?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "participation-and-reuse-q01" }, { "text": "Which proposed changes or uses require renewed consultation or permission under those documented conditions?", "kind": "action", "id": "participation-and-reuse-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "public-accountability", "name": "Public accountability", "description": "How spectators can understand the documentary method and how a production responds to challenges over time.", "rationale": "A documentary claim remains assessable only when its construction and subsequent changes can be identified.", "layers": [ { "id": "audience-disclosure", "name": "Audience disclosure", "description": "The information available to spectators about sources, transformations and unresolved questions.", "findings": [ { "id": "accessible-method-account", "name": "Accessible method account", "description": "Record which methodological disclosures reach audiences and when they become available.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where can spectators discover the source basis, editing methods and use of invented or composite material?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "accessible-method-account-q01" }, { "text": "Do publicity, programme notes and the performance make compatible claims about authenticity and verbatim accuracy?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "accessible-method-account-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "challenge-and-revision", "name": "Challenge and revision", "description": "Version-specific handling of disputed representations, new evidence and corrections.", "findings": [ { "id": "documentary-change-record", "name": "Documentary change record", "description": "Record challenges and responses against the relevant script, staging or recording rather than treating the work as fixed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documentary claims have been challenged, by whom, on what evidence and in relation to which production version?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documentary-change-record-q01" }, { "text": "What correction, contextual note or performance revision is justified, and how will affected versions and audiences be identified?", "kind": "action", "id": "documentary-change-record-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The listed kinds overlap and do not constitute a universally accepted taxonomy.", "Practitioners differ over how much fictionalization or reconstruction is compatible with the documentary designation.", "Regional examples identify influential traditions, not exclusive practices; legal obligations depend on jurisdiction and source use." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Verbatim theatre", "Tribunal theatre", "Interview-based documentary theatre", "Archival documentary theatre", "Autobiographical documentary performance" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Examining political events, public institutions and contested histories.", "Staging testimony from communities whose experiences receive limited public attention.", "Exploring legal proceedings and questions of accountability.", "Supporting education and public discussion through performances grounded in documentary material.", "Preserving and interpreting oral histories and personal memories." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Editing, juxtaposition or performance choices can misrepresent testimony despite preserving individual quotations.", "Audiences may mistake documentary provenance for impartiality or complete factual accuracy.", "Using personal testimony can compromise privacy, exceed participants' consent or cause renewed distress.", "Unacknowledged reconstruction or invented dialogue can obscure the distinction between evidence and dramatization.", "Uncleared source material or allegations about identifiable people can raise copyright or defamation issues." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "German documentary theatre has a prominent tradition of politically critical work assembled from records and documents, associated with Erwin Piscator and Peter Weiss.", "British practice has a prominent verbatim and tribunal theatre tradition drawing on interviews and proceedings.", "United States practice includes documentary traditions associated with Federal Theatre Project Living Newspapers and later interview-based performance." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Verbatim theatre", "difference": "Verbatim theatre specifically foregrounds the recorded words of actual speakers; documentary theatre can also use archives, images, statistics and other records, and need not reproduce wording exactly." }, { "name": "Historical drama", "difference": "Historical drama depicts the past but may rely extensively on invented dialogue and characters; documentary theatre makes documentary material central to its construction." }, { "name": "Political theatre", "difference": "Political theatre is distinguished by its political subject or purpose; documentary theatre is distinguished by its use of documentary material and need not advance an explicit political programme." }, { "name": "Ethnodrama", "difference": "Ethnodrama dramatizes ethnographic research material; documentary theatre has a broader range of sources and does not require an ethnographic research process." }, { "name": "Documentary film", "difference": "Documentary film organizes documentary material as a moving-image work; documentary theatre organizes it as theatrical performance, which may itself incorporate film." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of documentary theatre this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which scholarly and practitioner definitions should anchor the registry definition, particularly where documentary theatre overlaps with verbatim theatre, testimony theatre and historical reconstruction?", "How should a work be classified when it presents a documentary claim but deliberately obscures, fictionalises or destabilises its apparent sources?", "What traceability can reasonably be required when testimony must remain confidential or an originating archive is inaccessible?", "How should competing accounts from participants, source speakers and creators be represented when they disagree about the meaning or fairness of a performance?", "Which characteristics belong to the enduring work, and which must be reassessed for every staging, tour, translation or recording?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }