{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:05:13Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0954a-037a-7102-9d5d-af995b206012\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: M1867 Werndl-Holub\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 044: 1", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 62.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0954a-0389-7240-93c2-f19c7832e06c\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: M1867 Werndl-Holub\nRegistry id: vr.tr.m1867-werndl-holub\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this en" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:56:51+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q6713597", "registryId": "vr.tr.m1867-werndl-holub", "name": "M1867 Werndl-Holub", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q6713597/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.m1867-werndl-holub", "name": "M1867 Werndl-Holub", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the M1867 Werndl-Holub rifle pattern, distinguish later alterations, and assess what documentation, conservation or specialist examination a representative specimen requires.", "definition": "The M1867 Werndl-Holub is an Austrian single-shot, black-powder military rifle adopted in 1867, using a manually rotated cylindrical breechblock and an external hammer to fire metallic centerfire cartridges.", "scope_statement": "This model owns registry entry vr.tr.m1867-werndl-holub in PHY / PHY.OBJ as a historical firearm design pattern, including evidence needed to classify specimens against it; individual objects, ammunition and successor patterns remain related entities.", "in_scope": [ "Defining configuration of the M1867 single-shot breechloading rifle", "Werndl-Holub rotating breech mechanism and externally observable identification features", "Evidence distinguishing original M1867 configuration from later conversions or mixed assemblies", "Manufacturer markings, military acceptance evidence and configuration provenance", "Pattern-specific condition observations and conservation constraints" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Independent models of the M1873 and M1873/77 successor patterns", "Cartridge design, ammunition manufacture and loading specifications", "Detailed firing, repair or modification procedures", "Complete biographies of Werndl and Holub or histories of their manufacturers", "Individual specimen ownership, valuation and transaction records" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify a single-shot metallic-cartridge breechloader with a rotating drum breechblock; distinguish its longitudinal rotation axis from the transverse pivot of a conventional rolling-block action.", "Check the original external hammer and lock arrangement against documented M1867 examples; the M1873 revision changed the hammer arrangement. Reference: [Military History Museum](https://ebadatelnavhm.vhu.sk/item/3/5).", "Separate an original M1867 configuration from an M1867/77 alteration using documented conversion evidence rather than the base model name alone.", "Distinguish the Werndl mechanism from the hinged breechblock of a Wänzl conversion; Austrian service provenance alone does not establish the pattern.", "Require agreement between mechanism, lock configuration and markings; an approximate 11 mm calibre or a Werndl catalogue label alone is insufficient." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Pattern attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "M1867 original configuration | M1867/77 conversion | other Werndl pattern | mixed assembly | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents successor patterns and converted specimens from being silently treated as original M1867 rifles." }, { "name": "Breech and lock configuration", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented rotating drum and hammer arrangement, with photographs or drawing references", "why_it_matters": "Mechanism and lock architecture provide stronger identification evidence than a general catalogue name." }, { "name": "Reported chambering", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Verbatim source designation, evidence method and confidence; unknown permitted", "why_it_matters": "Original and altered configurations must be distinguished without treating a reported calibre as proof of ammunition compatibility." }, { "name": "Overall and barrel length", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "mm, with measurement endpoints and accessory inclusion stated", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison with documented rifle configurations and flags shortening or confusion with carbines." }, { "name": "Unloaded specimen mass", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kg, with included sling, bayonet and other accessories declared", "why_it_matters": "Makes physical comparisons meaningful without confusing accessory mass with pattern differences." }, { "name": "Marking attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Transcribed mark linked to its physical location, photograph and supporting manufacturer or acceptance reference", "why_it_matters": "Separates observed inscriptions from inferred production dates or service histories." }, { "name": "Configuration integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "apparently consistent | documented conversion | replacement components | suspected composite | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether a specimen can serve as evidence for the original pattern." }, { "name": "Conservation and examination status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Observed corrosion, stock damage, missing components and alteration evidence; chamber status and specialist assessment recorded separately", "why_it_matters": "Visible completeness does not establish mechanical integrity or safe handling status." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare specimen photographs and markings with documented M1867 reference examples.", "Flag likely M1867/77 conversions, successor patterns or composite assemblies for review.", "Record dimensions and configuration with explicit measurement conventions.", "Prepare a museum catalogue description that separates observation, attribution and uncertainty.", "Identify conservation concerns and request qualified examination before mechanical manipulation.", "Link a specimen to ammunition, bayonet and service-history records without merging those subjects into this model." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify the rifle from markings and documented features for its owner or a museum.", "Report its adoption and service history from historical sources.", "Explain that owning, carrying and transferring it is governed by national law." ], "must_not": [ "Assist anyone to obtain, use or modify it to harm people.", "Help evade firearm or antique weapon rules in any jurisdiction.", "Give instructions to make it fire or to restore a deactivated example.", "Misrepresent a reproduction or composite as an original in a sale." ], "requires_human": [ "Any transfer, export, restoration or destruction of the rifle." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Antique firearms are still weapons; legal status varies by jurisdiction.", "Military antiques recall wars and the soldiers who carried them." ], "affected_parties": [ "Collectors and museums", "Bystanders", "Buyers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The owner or museum that holds it; national firearm or antique weapon rules apply.", "master_systems": [ "National firearm registers where antiques are registered" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Single-shot rifle with an external side hammer.", "Cylindrical breechblock rotating to open the breech.", "Austrian military and maker markings with serials." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Unsafe discharge if an antique is fired.", "Theft and misuse of old weapons.", "Fakes and composites in the collector market." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "This rifle pattern is encountered in military history collections, museum stores and research on nineteenth-century infantry equipment.", "Its configuration and markings support identification, dating and assessment of later alterations when compared with documented specimens." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Object ID documentation standard, promoted by the International Council of Museums, applies to recording identifying features of museum specimens." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q6713597: M1867 Werndl-Holub", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6713597", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Werndl–Holub rifle", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werndl%E2%80%93Holub_rifle", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "pattern-identity", "name": "Pattern identity", "description": "Establishes what qualifies as the registered M1867 pattern.", "rationale": "Werndl names can describe a mechanism family, a specific pattern or a subsequently altered specimen.", "layers": [ { "id": "designation-boundary", "name": "Designation boundary", "description": "Separates the registered pattern from broader family labels.", "findings": [ { "id": "m1867-reference-configuration", "name": "M1867 reference configuration", "description": "Anchor attribution to documented M1867 configuration evidence while retaining the source's exact designation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented configuration defines M1867 for this registry entry?", "kind": "definition", "id": "m1867-reference-configuration-q01" }, { "text": "Does a source's use of Werndl-Holub identify M1867 specifically or the wider rifle family?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "m1867-reference-configuration-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "physical-identification", "name": "Physical identification", "description": "Tests attribution through mechanism and external form.", "findings": [ { "id": "mechanism-and-lock-evidence", "name": "Mechanism and lock evidence", "description": "Record the rotating breechblock and hammer placement together; the documented M1873 hammer revision makes lock arrangement relevant to identification. Reference: [Military History Museum](https://ebadatelnavhm.vhu.sk/item/3/5).", "questions": [ { "text": "Do available views show the characteristic rotating drum breech and the original M1867 hammer arrangement?", "kind": "definition", "id": "mechanism-and-lock-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which additional photographs or reference drawings would resolve confusion with M1873 or a Wänzl conversion?", "kind": "action", "id": "mechanism-and-lock-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "configuration-and-conversion", "name": "Configuration and conversion", "description": "Tracks differences between the initial pattern and later physical alterations.", "rationale": "A specimen retaining an M1867 identity may no longer represent its original chambering or fittings.", "layers": [ { "id": "ammunition-configuration", "name": "Ammunition configuration", "description": "Records chambering claims as evidence-dependent configuration attributes.", "findings": [ { "id": "original-versus-1877-alteration", "name": "Original versus 1877 alteration", "description": "Treat M1867/77 as a documented alteration relationship, with chambering attribution supported independently of the specimen's general name. Reference: [Military History Institute](https://www.vhu.sk/1115-mm-rakusko-uhorska-pechotna-puska-werndl-model-m186777/).", "questions": [ { "text": "What documentary or qualified examination evidence establishes original configuration or an M1867/77 alteration?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "original-versus-1877-alteration-q01" }, { "text": "Is the cartridge designation copied from a catalogue, inferred from markings or established by specialist examination?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "original-versus-1877-alteration-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "form-and-fittings", "name": "Form and fittings", "description": "Compares dimensions and furniture against a specific reference configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "rifle-form-consistency", "name": "Rifle form consistency", "description": "Evaluate barrel length, stock form, sights and bayonet attachment together rather than assuming every Werndl longarm is the same rifle pattern.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the barrel and overall lengths under explicitly stated measurement conventions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "rifle-form-consistency-q01" }, { "text": "Do sights, stock and attachment fittings agree with the attributed configuration or suggest replacement, shortening or another service form?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "rifle-form-consistency-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "manufacture-and-service-evidence", "name": "Manufacture and service evidence", "description": "Connects physical inscriptions and documentary records to pattern attribution.", "rationale": "A manufacturing inscription, acceptance mark and later inventory number support different claims.", "layers": [ { "id": "production-attribution", "name": "Production attribution", "description": "Establishes the evidential meaning of maker and date markings.", "findings": [ { "id": "maker-date-and-number", "name": "Maker, date and number", "description": "Preserve exact inscriptions and locations before interpreting them as manufacturer, production year or serial identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which marks are present on the receiver, barrel, lock and stock, and how are they transcribed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "maker-date-and-number-q01" }, { "text": "Which authoritative reference supports each maker or date interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "maker-date-and-number-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "assembly-and-service-history", "name": "Assembly and service history", "description": "Separates original assembly evidence from later military and collection history.", "findings": [ { "id": "alteration-and-acceptance-trace", "name": "Alteration and acceptance trace", "description": "Record acceptance, issue, repair and collection marks without assuming matching inscriptions prove untouched original assembly.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which marks or records indicate acceptance, conversion, replacement or later collection accession?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "alteration-and-acceptance-trace-q01" }, { "text": "Do component markings and documented chronology support one consistent configuration or leave a composite assembly possible?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "alteration-and-acceptance-trace-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-conservation", "name": "Condition and conservation", "description": "Determines how an attributed M1867 specimen can be documented and preserved.", "rationale": "Wear or intervention around the breech, lock and stock can affect both historical evidence and handling decisions.", "layers": [ { "id": "material-and-mechanical-condition", "name": "Material and mechanical condition", "description": "Records visible deterioration without inferring serviceability.", "findings": [ { "id": "breech-lock-and-stock-condition", "name": "Breech, lock and stock condition", "description": "Document corrosion, cracks, missing parts and apparent alterations around the rotating breech assembly, hammer and adjacent stock.", "questions": [ { "text": "What visible damage or material loss affects the breech assembly, lock mounting and surrounding wood?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "breech-lock-and-stock-condition-q01" }, { "text": "Which observations require qualified examination before any mechanism movement or further handling?", "kind": "action", "id": "breech-lock-and-stock-condition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-preserving-actions", "name": "Evidence-preserving actions", "description": "Connects uncertainty and historical significance to permitted conservation work.", "findings": [ { "id": "handling-and-intervention-record", "name": "Handling and intervention record", "description": "Keep chamber-status verification, any deactivation evidence and conservation authorization separate from pattern identification; preserve marks and original surfaces as historical evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who established the specimen's chamber status and any claimed deactivation, and what record supports that assessment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "handling-and-intervention-record-q01" }, { "text": "Which documentation or conservation actions are authorized while protecting inscriptions, finishes and evidence of conversion?", "kind": "action", "id": "handling-and-intervention-record-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This entry describes a rifle model, not an individual surviving firearm or the entire Werndl-Holub family.", "The original cartridge is commonly designated 11.15×42 mm R and the later cartridge 11.15×58 mm R; verify chambering and conversion status for any particular specimen.", "Variant-specific dimensions, markings and service dates require checking; no sources were consulted for this recall-based description." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Original M1867 rifle", "M1867/77 rifle modified for the later cartridge" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Austrian military model designation", "value_or_pattern": "M1867", "note": "Identifies the adopted rifle model, not an individual firearm." }, { "scheme": "Austrian military modification designation", "value_or_pattern": "M1867/77", "note": "Distinguishes rifles modified for the ammunition introduced in 1877." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Service rifle of the Austro-Hungarian armed forces.", "Later reserve and secondary military service after repeating rifles became standard.", "Museum collections and historical firearms collecting." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Nominal caliber", "typical_range": "11.15", "unit": "mm" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Black-powder fouling and corrosion can impair the bore, chamber and breech mechanism.", "Age-related deterioration or wear can compromise the safety of surviving examples.", "Original and converted rifles have different chamberings; incompatible ammunition presents a serious hazard." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "German-language descriptions commonly use Gewehr M.1867; English-language descriptions commonly use M1867 Werndl-Holub or Werndl rifle." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "M1873 Werndl-Holub", "difference": "A later revised model within the Werndl-Holub family, rather than the original 1867 model." }, { "name": "Wänzl rifle", "difference": "A conversion of earlier muzzle-loading rifles using a hinged breechblock, rather than the Werndl-Holub rotating cylindrical breech." }, { "name": "Remington rolling-block rifle", "difference": "Its breechblock pivots about a transverse axis; the Werndl-Holub breechblock rotates about a longitudinal axis." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of M1867 Werndl-Holub this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend M1867 Werndl-Holub to cover only the original rifle pattern, or also M1867-derived service forms and M1867/77 conversions?", "Which original military specification or museum reference establishes baseline dimensions, sight configuration and fittings for the intended pattern?", "How should differing nominal calibre and cartridge designations in reference catalogues be reconciled for original and converted examples?", "Which acceptance and conversion marks reliably distinguish official alterations from later replacement parts or collector restoration?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this precise pattern, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 16, "questions": 24 } }