{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:39:07Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094fb-1981-7ba3-a66a-8e92c3334468\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: fantastic art\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 r", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094fb-198b-7b53-aedb-d6f90beec68f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: fantastic art\nRegistry id: vr.tr.fantastic-art\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:39:39+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q782129", "registryId": "vr.tr.fantastic-art", "name": "fantastic art", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q782129/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.fantastic-art", "name": "fantastic art", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, describe and assess fantastic art through its departures from ordinary reality, visual construction, contextual evidence and conditions of interpretation and reuse.", "definition": "Fantastic art is a broad category of visual art depicting imaginary, supernatural or otherwise improbable beings, spaces and events, often through transformations of recognizable reality.", "scope_statement": "This model owns fantastic art as a visual creative category associated with imagined beings, worlds, events or transformations that exceed ordinary reality, while recording evidence and uncertainty for the classification of individual works.", "in_scope": [ "Evidence for classifying a visual work as fantastic art", "Imagined beings, spaces, events and departures from ordinary reality", "Visual methods that make impossible or extraordinary subjects perceptible", "Relationships to artistic traditions, narrative settings and neighbouring categories", "Work identity, variants and reproductions where they affect the fantastic content", "Interpretive context and permissions relevant to presenting or reusing particular works" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Fantasy literature, music and performance except as sources or adaptations of visual works", "Complete models of Surrealism, science fiction, horror or religious art", "The truth or falsity of religious beliefs and cultural cosmologies", "General artist biographies and institutional histories", "Physical conservation of paintings, sculptures and other carriers", "General copyright administration and digital asset management" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify a depicted being, event, space or transformation that motivates the fantastic classification; unusual technique alone does not establish it.", "Separate a broad fantastic-art classification from documented membership in a named movement such as Surrealism.", "For religious or mythological imagery, record whose interpretation treats the subject as fantastic instead of assuming its makers regarded it as imaginary.", "Distinguish an autonomous visual work from a narrative illustration or production design without excluding either solely because of its function.", "Record whether the extraordinary content suggests fantasy, speculative technology, horror or several categories together rather than treating these labels as interchangeable." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification standing", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "proposed | supported | disputed | unresolved, with attribution and evidence", "why_it_matters": "Allows the agent to distinguish a working interpretation from a documented classification." }, { "name": "Mode of departure from ordinary reality", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "imagined being | impossible anatomy | transformed object | impossible space | supernatural event | invented world | ambiguous anomaly; multiple values allowed", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the particular content that makes the fantastic classification useful." }, { "name": "Reality frame", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "explicit fiction | dream or vision | symbolic scene | culturally situated cosmology | speculative scenario | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the agent from imposing one account of reality on every image." }, { "name": "Visual treatment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "illusionistic | stylised | diagrammatic | abstracted | mixed, with description of its effect", "why_it_matters": "Separates what is depicted from how convincingly or indirectly it is made visible." }, { "name": "Narrative dependence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-contained | source-dependent | shared-world-dependent | indeterminate", "why_it_matters": "Indicates whether recognising the fantastic content requires information beyond the image." }, { "name": "Imagery source relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "links to documented texts, traditions, prior images, commissions or invented settings, with relationship and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Supports attribution without mistaking visual resemblance for established influence." }, { "name": "Version relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "original work | revised composition | adaptation | reproduction | detail | installation view, linked to the relevant work", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a crop, revision or reproduction from silently becoming the authoritative representation." }, { "name": "Intended presentation or reuse", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unassessed | permitted for specified use | permission required | restricted | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Connects a proposed action to the particular image, version and permission evidence." } ], "affordances": [ "Propose a fantastic-art classification with visible evidence, attributed interpretations and uncertainty.", "Describe impossible beings, spaces and events while separating observation from interpretation.", "Compare how works use anatomy, scale, perspective and rendering to construct extraordinary scenes.", "Trace documented relationships to stories, traditions and invented worlds.", "Select a representative version that preserves the features relevant to classification.", "Prepare contextualised descriptions or reuse proposals based on available attribution and permission evidence." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe fantastic art, its history and artists from reliable sources.", "Show works with credit to the artist and within licence terms." ], "must_not": [ "Attribute works to the wrong artist or help pass off forgeries.", "Generate imitations of a living artist's style and sell them as theirs.", "Strip signatures, credits or licence information from images.", "Present disturbing imagery to children or unwilling viewers without warning." ], "requires_human": [ "Authenticating or valuing a work for sale." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Artists' livelihoods depend on credit and control over copies of their work.", "Imaginative art may draw on religious or folk imagery that communities hold sacred." ], "affected_parties": [ "Artists", "Collectors and museums", "Viewers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The artist or rights holder for each work; museums and collectors keep the originals.", "master_systems": [ "Museum and collection catalogues" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "Imaginary or monstrous beings, dream-like spaces or impossible transformations of real things.", "Often rendered with careful realism that makes the impossible look solid." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Forgeries and misattributions distort the market and the historical record." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Fantastic art appears in galleries, illustrated books, public artworks and digital media where imagined beings and impossible environments support visual storytelling.", "It is used to explore mythology, dreams, speculative worlds and symbolic experiences through departures from ordinary reality." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization, provides international copyright protection for qualifying artistic works." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q782129: fantastic art", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q782129", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Fantastic art", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantastic_art", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "category-and-boundaries", "name": "Category and boundaries", "description": "Establishes what fantastic art means for the record and why a work belongs within it.", "rationale": "The category requires an explicit basis because subject matter, movement affiliation and viewer interpretation can produce different classifications.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-evidence", "name": "Classification evidence", "description": "Connects the label to identifiable features and attributed descriptions.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-for-fantastic-classification", "name": "Basis for fantastic classification", "description": "Record the visual feature or contextual statement supporting the label and distinguish documented usage from an agent's proposal.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which depicted feature or documented description supports calling this work fantastic art?", "kind": "definition", "id": "basis-for-fantastic-classification-q01" }, { "text": "Who applied the label, in what context, and does the record preserve their wording?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-for-fantastic-classification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "adjacent-category-boundaries", "name": "Adjacent category boundaries", "description": "Separates overlapping labels without requiring exclusive classification.", "findings": [ { "id": "overlap-with-neighbouring-art", "name": "Overlap with neighbouring art", "description": "Record how the work relates to fantasy illustration, Surrealism, horror, speculative imagery or religious art without equating these categories.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports each neighbouring label independently of the fantastic-art label?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "overlap-with-neighbouring-art-q01" }, { "text": "Does the classification depend on treating a culturally meaningful being or event as imaginary, and whose viewpoint is that?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "overlap-with-neighbouring-art-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "fantastic-content", "name": "Fantastic content", "description": "Records what exceeds ordinary reality and how the depicted world accommodates it.", "rationale": "An agent needs to identify the specific departure from reality rather than rely on a general impression of strangeness.", "layers": [ { "id": "beings-and-transformations", "name": "Beings and transformations", "description": "Describes imagined entities and changes to familiar bodies or objects.", "findings": [ { "id": "entity-and-transformation-description", "name": "Entity and transformation description", "description": "Separate visible anatomy, combinations and transformations from inferred names, powers or symbolic meanings.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which visible features combine, alter or exceed familiar bodies and objects?", "kind": "definition", "id": "entity-and-transformation-description-q01" }, { "text": "Which names, abilities or meanings are documented, and which are inferred only from appearance?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "entity-and-transformation-description-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "world-rules-and-ambiguity", "name": "World rules and ambiguity", "description": "Examines whether the extraordinary is normal within the scene, an intrusion or deliberately unresolved.", "findings": [ { "id": "status-of-the-extraordinary", "name": "Status of the extraordinary", "description": "Record evidence about the scene's reality frame while retaining uncertainty between literal event, dream, allegory and other readings.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the work present its extraordinary elements as ordinary features of an invented world or as disruptions of a familiar one?", "kind": "definition", "id": "status-of-the-extraordinary-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes a depicted event from a dream, metaphor, vision or intentionally ambiguous scene?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "status-of-the-extraordinary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "visual-construction", "name": "Visual construction", "description": "Describes how visual decisions make fantastic content legible, convincing or unstable.", "rationale": "Similar subjects can produce different fantastic effects through rendering, spatial organisation and the relationship between familiar and impossible details.", "layers": [ { "id": "rendering-the-impossible", "name": "Rendering the impossible", "description": "Examines how technique gives perceptible form to extraordinary subjects.", "findings": [ { "id": "credibility-and-stylisation", "name": "Credibility and stylisation", "description": "Record how surface, anatomy, lighting and detail support or interrupt the apparent presence of impossible entities.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which rendering choices make the impossible subject appear materially present, schematic or unstable?", "kind": "definition", "id": "credibility-and-stylisation-q01" }, { "text": "Which relevant details remain visible in the available reproduction, and which require a better image or direct examination?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "credibility-and-stylisation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "space-scale-and-composition", "name": "Space, scale and composition", "description": "Examines spatial contradictions and arrangements that generate the fantastic effect.", "findings": [ { "id": "spatial-departure", "name": "Spatial departure", "description": "Identify altered scale, incompatible viewpoints, impossible architecture or unexpected juxtapositions, distinguishing them from reproduction artefacts.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where do scale, perspective, continuity or placement depart from the scene's apparent physical expectations?", "kind": "definition", "id": "spatial-departure-q01" }, { "text": "Could cropping, lens distortion, installation viewpoint or reproduction quality account for the apparent anomaly?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "spatial-departure-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "sources-and-interpretation", "name": "Sources and interpretation", "description": "Connects fantastic imagery to documented sources and situated readings.", "rationale": "Recognising a motif does not establish its origin, and interpretations can vary across makers, communities and audiences.", "layers": [ { "id": "imagery-lineage", "name": "Imagery lineage", "description": "Tracks documented relationships to prior images, stories and traditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-source-relationship", "name": "Documented source relationship", "description": "Distinguish explicit adaptation, acknowledged influence and proposed resemblance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which text, image, tradition or invented setting is documented as a source for the fantastic imagery?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-source-relationship-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence separates direct adaptation or influence from a resemblance identified by a later viewer?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-source-relationship-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "situated-readings", "name": "Situated readings", "description": "Records interpretations with their speakers and contexts.", "findings": [ { "id": "meaning-and-audience-response", "name": "Meaning and audience response", "description": "Keep maker statements, curatorial interpretations and audience responses distinct, including disagreements about wonder, fear, satire or spiritual significance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who describes the work as wondrous, threatening, satirical, spiritual or otherwise meaningful, and on what basis?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "meaning-and-audience-response-q01" }, { "text": "What contextual explanation should accompany the work to preserve a significant disputed or culturally situated reading?", "kind": "action", "id": "meaning-and-audience-response-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-versions-and-use", "name": "Work, versions and use", "description": "Identifies the visual work being assessed and the conditions for presenting its fantastic imagery.", "rationale": "Revisions, adaptations and reproductions can change the evidence for classification, while reuse decisions depend on the particular work and representation.", "layers": [ { "id": "identity-and-variants", "name": "Identity and variants", "description": "Connects available representations to the underlying work and records meaningful changes.", "findings": [ { "id": "fantastic-content-across-versions", "name": "Fantastic content across versions", "description": "Record whether revisions, crops, recolouring or adaptations alter the beings, atmosphere or spatial anomalies being assessed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the examined object the work itself, a revised composition, an adaptation or a reproduction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "fantastic-content-across-versions-q01" }, { "text": "Which version best supports the classification, and what changes in other versions affect that judgment?", "kind": "action", "id": "fantastic-content-across-versions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "presentation-and-reuse", "name": "Presentation and reuse", "description": "Supports concrete decisions about displaying, describing or adapting the imagery.", "findings": [ { "id": "use-specific-evidence", "name": "Use-specific evidence", "description": "Connect the proposed use to attribution, permission evidence and any documented conditions concerning depicted characters or source material.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence addresses permission for the intended use of this work and its selected reproduction?", "kind": "action", "id": "use-specific-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Are depicted characters or adapted source materials associated with additional documented conditions relevant to that use?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "use-specific-evidence-q02" }, { "text": "What credit and contextual description should accompany this particular representation?", "kind": "action", "id": "use-specific-evidence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense was supplied; this describes the broad visual-art category rather than a particular movement or named collection.", "Listed kinds overlap and do not constitute a standardized taxonomy.", "The distinction between fantastic art and fantasy art is inconsistent across scholarly, museum and commercial usage." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Visionary art", "Grotesque art", "Imaginary landscape", "Fantasy illustration" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Illustration for fantasy literature and book covers", "Concept art for films, animation and games", "Independent painting, drawing, printmaking and sculpture", "Exploration of dreams, imagination and psychological experience" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating a broad descriptive category as a single organized historical movement", "Equating fantastic art exclusively with commercial fantasy illustration", "Classifying religious imagery as fantasy without considering its cultural context", "Confusing an original artwork, its reproduction and the publication containing it" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The boundary between fantastic, sacred, mythological and supernatural imagery varies with cultural context.", "European art-historical uses often emphasize visionary and grotesque traditions; popular fantasy illustration is an overlapping usage." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Fantasy art", "difference": "Often denotes imagery associated with fantasy fiction and invented worlds; fantastic art can encompass a broader historical range of improbable and visionary imagery." }, { "name": "Surrealism", "difference": "Surrealism is a historically situated movement with associated theories and practices; fantastic art is a descriptive category that includes work outside that movement." }, { "name": "Science fiction art", "difference": "Science fiction art frames imagined subjects through speculative science or technology; fantastic art does not require that framing." }, { "name": "Mythological art", "difference": "Mythological art depicts subjects from identifiable myth traditions; fantastic art need not draw on an established narrative tradition." }, { "name": "Abstract art", "difference": "Abstraction concerns the relationship between visual form and representation; fantastic art concerns imagined subject matter, although the categories can overlap." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of fantastic art this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend fantastic art as a broad visual category, a particular historical category or a synonym for fantasy art?", "Which existing Vercy models already cover the category or its neighbouring concepts, and where should this entry link rather than duplicate them?", "Which researched sources can establish the category's boundaries across historical periods and cultural contexts?", "Should nonfigurative works qualify through documented fantastic intent or reception when no extraordinary subject can be identified visually?", "How should the model handle interactive, moving-image and spatial works whose fantastic effects emerge over time or through participation?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 27 } }