{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T09:14:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "missingProviders": [ "Grok" ], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": null, "turns": null, "seconds": 12.3, "error": "Error: Internal error: {\n \"message\": \"API error (status 402 Payment Required): Grok Build usage balance exhausted\",\n \"http_status\": 402\n}", "retried": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 118.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b24-1bbb-76d1-9772-54062b9ac8a9\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: cicer arietinum\nRegistry id: vr.tr.cicer-arietinum\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T11:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:04:45+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:32+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q81375", "registryId": "vr.tr.cicer-arietinum", "name": "cicer arietinum", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q81375/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.cicer-arietinum", "name": "cicer arietinum", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise Cicer arietinum, assess the condition and reproductive potential of its plants and seeds, and determine justified cultivation, propagation, harvest or handling actions.", "definition": "", "scope_statement": "This model owns the organism-level identity, development, condition and action-relevant properties of chickpea under vr.tr.cicer-arietinum, including attached organs and identifiable unprocessed seeds, with explicit links to cultivars, growing environments and material lots.", "in_scope": [ "Evidence identifying a plant or intact seed as Cicer arietinum.", "Cultivar or accession identity and desi, kabuli or other recorded seed type.", "Germination, vegetative development, flowering, pod formation and seed maturity.", "Root condition, nodulation and observed responses to growing conditions.", "Symptoms, damage and diagnostic evidence affecting plant or seed fitness.", "Suitability of identified material for propagation, harvest or transfer to a food, feed or storage model." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Other Cicer species and their independent biological descriptions.", "Field layout, rotations, irrigation infrastructure and whole-farm operations.", "Soil bodies, weather systems and microbial species as independently modelled things.", "Pathogen and pest life cycles, pesticide products and application regulations.", "Processed chickpea foods, recipes, nutritional prescriptions and finished feed formulations.", "Commercial lot ownership, contracts, pricing and certification systems." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Inspect leaves for multiple paired, toothed leaflets and a terminal leaflet; use this combination when separating chickpea from tendril-bearing pulse plants. [Kew botanical descriptions](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:486336-1/general-information)", "Inspect reproductive structures for solitary pea-like flowers and inflated, glandular-hairy pods, usually containing one or two seeds; require the combination rather than seed count alone. [Kew botanical descriptions](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:486336-1/general-information)", "Inspect intact seeds for a curved beak over the hilum and a peripheral groove when distinguishing chickpea from round peas or flattened lentils; incomplete material requires additional evidence. [Kew botanical descriptions](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:486336-1/general-information)", "Treat small angular desi seeds and larger plump kabuli seeds as variation within chickpea, not a species boundary. [Kew cultivar descriptions](https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:486336-1/general-information)", "For suspected wild Cicer relatives, require a documented botanical determination or validated identity test; a chickpea-like seed and a common-name label do not settle species identity." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Identity determination", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unassessed | provisional | supported | disputed; evidence and determiner recorded", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether chickpea-specific expectations can be applied." }, { "name": "Cultivar or accession", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named cultivar or accession linked to its provider record; unknown permitted", "why_it_matters": "Connects the individual to documented maturity, adaptation and resistance claims." }, { "name": "Seed type", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "desi | kabuli | other documented type | mixed sample | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison of seed appearance and intended uses without creating separate species." }, { "name": "Observed developmental stages", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "seed | germinating | vegetative | flowering | pod setting | seed filling | mature | senescent; concurrent stages allowed", "why_it_matters": "Makes stress observations and harvest decisions specific to the organs currently developing." }, { "name": "Flower and pod retention", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Counts and percentages for tagged flowers or pods over a stated interval", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes reproductive initiation from successful seed production." }, { "name": "Root nodulation assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unexamined | no nodules observed | nodules observed | effectiveness assessed; method recorded", "why_it_matters": "Prevents visible nodules from being treated as proof of adequate nitrogen fixation." }, { "name": "Symptom and damage burden", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Affected plants, organs or seeds as a percentage; severity scale and sampling basis recorded", "why_it_matters": "Separates an isolated lesion from a widespread condition requiring intervention." }, { "name": "Seed moisture", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "% water by mass, with wet or dry basis, method and sampling date", "why_it_matters": "Supports maturity, drying and storage assessments using an applicable threshold." }, { "name": "Seed germination", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "% normal seedlings under a stated test protocol and test date", "why_it_matters": "Provides evidence for propagation suitability rather than inferring it from seed appearance." }, { "name": "Seed size", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "g per 100 seeds, with moisture basis and sample definition", "why_it_matters": "Supports within-type comparison and detection of poorly filled or heterogeneous seed samples." }, { "name": "Material treatment history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Linked inoculation, coating, chemical treatment, drying or heating events", "why_it_matters": "Conditions subsequent propagation and food or feed routing decisions." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify and document a chickpea plant or seed sample, escalating uncertain determinations.", "Select and sow seed when identity, germination and treatment records support propagation.", "Assess root nodulation and decide whether further inoculation or nutrition investigation is justified.", "Monitor flowering, pod retention and stress to support stage-specific cultivation decisions.", "Sample symptomatic plants or damaged seeds and refer them for diagnostic testing.", "Harvest, segregate or route seeds to propagation, storage or processing workflows when recorded condition supports the intended use." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Identify chickpea plants and report crop condition for the grower who authorized it.", "Report seed variety and quality from trade documents." ], "must_not": [ "Recommend pesticides beyond label instructions.", "Misrepresent origin, variety or organic status.", "Advise eating raw or undercooked dry chickpeas.", "Omit legumes from allergen advice where relevant." ], "requires_human": [ "Destroying a diseased crop." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Chickpeas are a key protein in many diets and livelihoods.", "Legume allergies can be serious." ], "affected_parties": [ "Consumers", "Smallholder growers", "People with allergies" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The grower who cultivates it.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Small bushy plant with feathery compound leaves.", "Short inflated pods holding one or two round seeds." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Fungal blight in wet weather.", "Pest damage in storage." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Cicer arietinum is cultivated as chickpea in agricultural fields and gardens primarily for its edible seeds.", "Its seeds are encountered as planting material, dried pulses and ingredients for cooked foods or flour.", "Crop assessment considers establishment, flowering, pod development and seed condition when planning cultivation and harvest." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Codex CXS 171-1989, Standard for Certain Pulses, issued by the Codex Alimentarius Commission, covers chickpeas intended for direct human consumption.", "ISPM 12, Phytosanitary Certificates, issued by the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures under the International Plant Protection Convention, governs certification when international consignments require phytosanitary certificates." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q81375: cicer arietinum", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q81375", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Chickpea", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chickpea", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "chickpea-identity-and-lineage", "name": "Chickpea identity and lineage", "description": "Establish what material belongs to Cicer arietinum and which cultivated lineage it represents.", "rationale": "Species identity and cultivar identity support different decisions and must not be inferred from the same weak label.", "layers": [ { "id": "botanical-determination", "name": "Botanical determination", "description": "Evaluate the evidence identifying the observed plant or seed.", "findings": [ { "id": "diagnostic-character-combination", "name": "Diagnostic character combination", "description": "Record observed diagnostic organs, conflicting characters and the limits of the available material.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which leaf, flower, pod or seed characters support the determination as Cicer arietinum?", "kind": "definition", "id": "diagnostic-character-combination-q01" }, { "text": "Which alternative pulse or Cicer species remains plausible, and what additional examination would resolve it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "diagnostic-character-combination-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cultivated-lineage", "name": "Cultivated lineage", "description": "Connect seed appearance and supplier identity to a documented cultivar or accession.", "findings": [ { "id": "cultivar-and-seed-type-evidence", "name": "Cultivar and seed type evidence", "description": "Keep observed seed type separate from verified genetic or accession identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What supplier, accession or multiplication record supports the cultivar identity?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "cultivar-and-seed-type-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does observed seed size, shape and coat appearance support the declared desi, kabuli or other type?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "cultivar-and-seed-type-evidence-q02" }, { "text": "Does variation represent expected cultivar variation, mixed material or unresolved identity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cultivar-and-seed-type-evidence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "establishment-and-reproduction", "name": "Establishment and reproduction", "description": "Track the transition from chickpea seed to established plant and seed-bearing adult.", "rationale": "Emergence, flowering and filled pods provide distinct evidence of reproductive progress.", "layers": [ { "id": "seed-to-established-plant", "name": "Seed to established plant", "description": "Relate seed performance to observed emergence and early survival.", "findings": [ { "id": "germination-and-emergence-gap", "name": "Germination and emergence gap", "description": "Compare tested seed potential with establishment under recorded sowing conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What proportion of the seed sample produced normal seedlings under the recorded germination test?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "germination-and-emergence-gap-q01" }, { "text": "How many sown seeds emerged and survived, at what sowing depth and elapsed time?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "germination-and-emergence-gap-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence would justify resowing rather than waiting or investigating establishment failure?", "kind": "action", "id": "germination-and-emergence-gap-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "flower-to-filled-seed", "name": "Flower to filled seed", "description": "Record overlapping reproductive stages and successful seed formation.", "findings": [ { "id": "reproductive-progress-and-loss", "name": "Reproductive progress and loss", "description": "Distinguish flowers, retained pods, empty pods and filled seeds in dated observations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which flowering, pod-setting and seed-filling stages coexist on the observed plants?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reproductive-progress-and-loss-q01" }, { "text": "What fraction of tagged flowers or pods produced filled seeds over the observation interval?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reproductive-progress-and-loss-q02" }, { "text": "Which cultivar-specific observations establish maturity for the intended harvest?", "kind": "action", "id": "reproductive-progress-and-loss-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "root-symbiosis-and-growing-response", "name": "Root symbiosis and growing response", "description": "Record root function, nodulation and stage-specific responses to the growing environment.", "rationale": "Chickpea assessment needs explicit attention to root symbiosis and environmental stress; drought, heat and salinity are documented production constraints. [ICRISAT](https://cegsb.icrisat.org/improving-chickpea-adaptation-to-environmental-challenges-in-australia-and-india/)", "layers": [ { "id": "nodulation-and-inoculation", "name": "Nodulation and inoculation", "description": "Connect root observations with the history and assessed effectiveness of symbiosis.", "findings": [ { "id": "nodulation-evidence", "name": "Nodulation evidence", "description": "Record nodule observations and keep inferred nitrogen supply distinguishable from measured evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which inoculant identity, application date and handling record are linked to this chickpea material?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "nodulation-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What nodule abundance, distribution and internal appearance were observed using what root sampling method?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "nodulation-evidence-q02" }, { "text": "What further evidence is needed before attributing poor growth to ineffective nitrogen fixation?", "kind": "action", "id": "nodulation-evidence-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "stage-specific-environmental-response", "name": "Stage-specific environmental response", "description": "Relate measured exposure to plant response without assigning universal cultivar limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "stress-exposure-and-response", "name": "Stress exposure and response", "description": "Associate water, temperature and salinity observations with dated developmental and condition records.", "questions": [ { "text": "What root-zone water status, drainage, temperature or salinity exposure coincided with the observed growth or reproductive change?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "stress-exposure-and-response-q01" }, { "text": "Which local trial or cultivar record supports the proposed tolerance limits?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "stress-exposure-and-response-q02" }, { "text": "What evidence supports changing water management or taking protective action at the current developmental stage?", "kind": "action", "id": "stress-exposure-and-response-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "chickpea-health-and-damage", "name": "Chickpea health and damage", "description": "Separate observed injury from supported causal diagnoses and intervention decisions.", "rationale": "Ascochyta blight and Fusarium wilt warrant explicit diagnostic attention in chickpea, while resistance claims need their supporting context. [ICRISAT](https://cegsb.icrisat.org/improving-chickpea-adaptation-to-environmental-challenges-in-australia-and-india/)", "layers": [ { "id": "disease-evidence", "name": "Disease evidence", "description": "Capture lesion, wilt and root symptoms with diagnostic provenance.", "findings": [ { "id": "symptoms-versus-confirmed-cause", "name": "Symptoms versus confirmed cause", "description": "Record suspected Ascochyta blight, Fusarium wilt or other causes without equating symptoms with confirmation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which organs show lesions, wilting or root deterioration, and how widespread and severe are these observations?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "symptoms-versus-confirmed-cause-q01" }, { "text": "Which sample, test and diagnostic report support the suspected cause?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "symptoms-versus-confirmed-cause-q02" }, { "text": "What unresolved alternative cause prevents a treatment or seed-retention decision?", "kind": "action", "id": "symptoms-versus-confirmed-cause-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "feeding-injury-and-intervention", "name": "Feeding injury and intervention", "description": "Assess visible damage to growing tips, pods and seeds alongside evidence of the damaging organism.", "findings": [ { "id": "pod-and-seed-damage-assessment", "name": "Pod and seed damage assessment", "description": "Quantify reproductive damage and link any intervention to identified causes and applicable guidance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What fraction of sampled pods or seeds is damaged, and what organisms or feeding traces were observed?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "pod-and-seed-damage-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Which locally supported threshold and current crop stage justify intervention or continued monitoring?", "kind": "action", "id": "pod-and-seed-damage-assessment-q02" }, { "text": "What follow-up observation would show whether the intervention protected subsequent pod or seed development?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "pod-and-seed-damage-assessment-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "seed-fitness-and-material-routing", "name": "Seed fitness and material routing", "description": "Determine what harvested or retained chickpea material is fit for, preserving biological and treatment evidence.", "rationale": "Seed maturity, propagation fitness and suitability for a downstream use are separate judgements.", "layers": [ { "id": "harvest-and-seed-condition", "name": "Harvest and seed condition", "description": "Assess harvest readiness and the condition of the resulting intact seed.", "findings": [ { "id": "maturity-moisture-and-integrity", "name": "Maturity, moisture and integrity", "description": "Record the seed observations required before harvesting, drying or transferring material into storage.", "questions": [ { "text": "What pod and seed observations support readiness for green-seed harvest or mature dry-seed harvest?", "kind": "definition", "id": "maturity-moisture-and-integrity-q01" }, { "text": "What are the sampled seed moisture, size distribution and proportions of immature, cracked or visibly deteriorated seeds?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "maturity-moisture-and-integrity-q02" }, { "text": "Which intended storage conditions and supported moisture criterion justify transfer or further drying?", "kind": "action", "id": "maturity-moisture-and-integrity-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "propagation-and-use-handoff", "name": "Propagation and use handoff", "description": "Preserve identity and condition evidence when material changes purpose or enters another model.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-use-eligibility", "name": "Intended-use eligibility", "description": "Distinguish evidence supporting sowing from evidence required by food, feed or processing workflows.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do identity, germination, health and treatment records support retaining these seeds for sowing?", "kind": "action", "id": "intended-use-eligibility-q01" }, { "text": "What coating, chemical treatment, heating or handling history constrains the proposed downstream use?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-use-eligibility-q02" }, { "text": "At which processing step should a linked food, feed or material model take ownership while retaining chickpea provenance?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "intended-use-eligibility-q03" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which botanical key and validated tests best distinguish Cicer arietinum from closely related Cicer species when only seeds or immature plants are available?", "Which cultivar-specific phenology scales and local exposure thresholds should govern flowering, pod retention and maturity assessments?", "Which nodulation assessment methods reliably support action decisions across the intended soils and inoculation practices?", "Which regional diagnostic protocols, resistance records and intervention thresholds should support Ascochyta blight, Fusarium wilt and pod-damage decisions?", "Which seed-testing and storage criteria apply to each intended use, and does an existing Vercy world model already own any part of the proposed plant-to-seed boundary?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 10, "questions": 29 } }