{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:02:15Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d9-0fce-7420-bc86-bd8fd9c9b865\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: de Havilland Leopard Moth\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 87.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d9-0fbf-75f1-8338-d396ce122ef8\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: de Havilland Leopard Moth\nRegistry id: vr.tr.de-havilland-leopard-moth\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folde" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:51:39+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q825165", "registryId": "vr.tr.de-havilland-leopard-moth", "name": "de Havilland Leopard Moth", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q825165/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.de-havilland-leopard-moth", "name": "de Havilland Leopard Moth", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise the de Havilland DH.85 Leopard Moth aircraft type, assess evidence about an example's configuration and condition, and identify prerequisites for preservation, maintenance or operation.", "definition": "The de Havilland Leopard Moth (D.H.85) is a British three-seat, single-engine, high-wing cabin monoplane introduced in 1933 for private and touring aviation, with predominantly wooden construction and fixed conventional landing gear.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the type-specific recognition criteria, configuration distinctions and assessment questions for de Havilland Leopard Moth, registry vr.tr.de-havilland-leopard-moth, within PHY / PHY.OBJ; individual aircraft supply evidence without becoming separate type definitions.", "in_scope": [ "DH.85 identity and differentiation from other de Havilland Moth aircraft", "Three-seat cabin arrangement and characteristic airframe construction", "Installed propulsion, controls and configuration departures", "Configuration-dependent loading, performance and ground-handling constraints", "Structural preservation, repair provenance and continuing-airworthiness evidence" ], "out_of_scope": [ "General aerodynamic principles shared by powered aeroplanes", "Complete engineering models of Gipsy engines and propellers", "Ownership, registration histories and maintenance logs as independent aircraft records", "Pilot licensing, aerodrome management and airspace rules as standalone models", "Other Moth aircraft types and the biological leopard moth" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Confirm the DH.85 designation through identification records; a Moth name or painted registration alone is insufficient.", "Check for the three-seat high-wing cabin-monoplane configuration described in [NACA Aircraft Circular 186](https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark%3A/67531/metadc279636/m2/1/high_res_d/19930090495.pdf).", "Examine fuselage construction: the wooden box structure is a key distinction from the similar DH.80A Puss Moth. [DH Moth Club](https://www.dhmothclub.co.uk/representative-aircraft-types/dh85-leopard-moth/)", "Compare wing geometry with the Puss Moth: marked taper and sweep are documented Leopard Moth recognition features. [NACA Aircraft Circular 186](https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark%3A/67531/metadc279636/m2/1/high_res_d/19930090495.pdf)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Type identity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "de Havilland DH.85 Leopard Moth; verified, provisional or disputed attribution", "why_it_matters": "Prevents similar Moth aircraft and unidentified restoration projects from inheriting DH.85 assumptions." }, { "name": "Cabin accommodation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Three-seat baseline; record installed seating, restraints and approved occupancy separately", "why_it_matters": "Seat count identifies the design but does not establish permissible loading." }, { "name": "Airframe construction conformity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented baseline, approved repair, approved modification, undocumented departure or unknown", "why_it_matters": "A restored wooden fuselage can resemble the original while differing in materials or structural details." }, { "name": "Engine and propeller installation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Installed engine mark and serial, propeller designation, installation approval and applicable limits", "why_it_matters": "The historical Gipsy Major installation does not establish the configuration of every surviving aircraft." }, { "name": "Aircraft dimensions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Wing span, length and height in m; configuration and documentary source required", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification, hangar allocation and transport planning." }, { "name": "Loading envelope", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Mass in kg; centre of gravity in mm from a stated datum; approved limits and weighing date", "why_it_matters": "Fuel, occupants and restoration changes affect whether a proposed load is acceptable." }, { "name": "Fuel and lubricant provision", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Capacity and usable quantity in L; approved grades linked to the installed engine and fuel system", "why_it_matters": "Historical consumption or fuel descriptions cannot establish current suitability or endurance." }, { "name": "Wood and covering condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Inspection findings for moisture damage, bond integrity, cracking, covering deterioration and inaccessible areas", "why_it_matters": "External appearance alone cannot establish structural condition." }, { "name": "Operational eligibility", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Display only, restoration, ground activity authorised, flight authorised, restricted or unverified; authority and date required", "why_it_matters": "Separates historical completeness and mechanical condition from permission for a particular activity." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a candidate aircraft against DH.85 documentary and physical recognition evidence.", "Compare an example's installed configuration with an evidenced Leopard Moth baseline.", "Identify missing loading, inspection or approval evidence before proposing operation.", "Prepare a specialist inspection or restoration brief for its wooden airframe and installed equipment.", "Assess hangar, display or transport compatibility using verified dimensions and handling instructions.", "Trace DH.85 maintenance requirements to applicable manuals, technical notices and aircraft records." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the type's design and its role in interwar private flying.", "Track maintenance and airworthiness records for the owner of a flying example." ], "must_not": [ "Clear a vintage aircraft to fly without a valid airworthiness review.", "Alter or fabricate maintenance or log book entries.", "Swing a propeller or run an engine without a qualified person in control." ], "requires_human": [ "Any decision to fly or restore a vintage aircraft." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Flying vintage aircraft keeps heritage alive but must not trade safety for authenticity." ], "affected_parties": [ "Pilots and passengers", "Spectators", "Owners and restorers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The registered owner of each example; the civil aviation authority keeps registration records.", "master_systems": [ "National civil aircraft registers" ] }, "visual_identification": [ "A high-wing cabin monoplane with a single nose-mounted inline engine.", "Fixed tailwheel undercarriage and wooden construction with a side-by-side and rear seating cabin." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Wood and glue deterioration in old airframes.", "Hand propeller starting can cause serious injury." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "This historic three-seat cabin aircraft was developed for private flying and touring.", "Surviving examples are encountered in aviation collections, restoration projects and heritage flying, where individual maintenance and configuration records matter." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Annex 7 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, issued by the International Civil Aviation Organization, establishes nationality and registration marking standards implemented through national rules.", "Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, issued by the International Civil Aviation Organization, provides the international airworthiness framework, with the operating eligibility of a historic example determined by its national certification regime." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q825165: de Havilland Leopard Moth", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q825165", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: De Havilland Leopard Moth", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Leopard_Moth", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "dh85-identity", "name": "DH.85 identity", "description": "Establish whether the subject belongs to the Leopard Moth type and how confidently that attribution is supported.", "rationale": "Similar Moth names, restored appearances and replacement components can obscure aircraft identity.", "layers": [ { "id": "documentary-attribution", "name": "Documentary attribution", "description": "Connect the registered type to evidence identifying a particular example.", "findings": [ { "id": "type-and-airframe-evidence", "name": "Type and airframe evidence", "description": "Require agreement between the DH.85 designation, construction identity and supporting records.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which plate, construction record or authoritative aircraft record identifies this example as a DH.85?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "type-and-airframe-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Do conflicting identities or major reconstruction leave its attribution uncertain?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "type-and-airframe-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "physical-recognition", "name": "Physical recognition", "description": "Use a combination of cabin, wing and fuselage evidence to distinguish the type.", "findings": [ { "id": "leopard-versus-puss", "name": "Leopard versus Puss Moth", "description": "Test the wooden box fuselage and characteristic wing geometry alongside the three-seat cabin layout.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which visible or documented features distinguish this aircraft from a DH.80A Puss Moth?", "kind": "definition", "id": "leopard-versus-puss-q01" }, { "text": "Which recognition features have been obscured or altered during restoration?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "leopard-versus-puss-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "wooden-airframe", "name": "Wooden airframe and preservation", "description": "Assess the construction, condition and repair evidence of the Leopard Moth airframe.", "rationale": "The wooden fuselage is both a defining feature and a reason to demand material-specific condition evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "structural-condition", "name": "Structural condition", "description": "Locate evidence about load-bearing wood, joints, covering and attached fittings.", "findings": [ { "id": "wood-and-joint-integrity", "name": "Wood and joint integrity", "description": "Record inspection coverage and unresolved defects without treating an intact finish as proof of soundness.", "questions": [ { "text": "What inspection evidence addresses moisture damage, cracking and bond deterioration in the fuselage and wings?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "wood-and-joint-integrity-q01" }, { "text": "Which structural areas remain inaccessible or insufficiently assessed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "wood-and-joint-integrity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "restoration-conformity", "name": "Restoration conformity", "description": "Connect replacement materials and repairs to applicable DH.85 engineering information.", "findings": [ { "id": "repair-design-basis", "name": "Repair design basis", "description": "Trace repairs to appropriate drawings and schemes; DHSL identifies itself as custodian of surviving DH.85 design and repair data. [DHSL Moths](https://www.dhsupport.com/moth.php)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which DH.85 drawing or accepted repair scheme supports each major structural replacement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "repair-design-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which material substitutions or undocumented repairs require specialist disposition?", "kind": "action", "id": "repair-design-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "propulsion-and-controls", "name": "Propulsion and controls", "description": "Resolve the installed powerplant, supporting systems and control configuration.", "rationale": "Historical type descriptions cannot supply operating assumptions for an aircraft with replacement engines or modified equipment.", "layers": [ { "id": "installed-powerplant", "name": "Installed powerplant", "description": "Identify the engine and propeller as an approved installation rather than by family resemblance.", "findings": [ { "id": "engine-propeller-conformity", "name": "Engine and propeller conformity", "description": "The contemporary description specifies Gipsy Major engines; establish the actual installation separately. [NACA Aircraft Circular 186](https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark%3A/67531/metadc279636/m2/1/high_res_d/19930090495.pdf)", "questions": [ { "text": "What engine mark and propeller are installed, and which records establish their compatibility with this DH.85?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "engine-propeller-conformity-q01" }, { "text": "Which power, speed and service limits apply to that exact installation?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "engine-propeller-conformity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "system-and-control-state", "name": "System and control state", "description": "Resolve fuel, lubrication, starting equipment and flight-control condition using aircraft-specific evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-before-operation", "name": "Configuration before operation", "description": "Establish installed controls and service provisions before selecting procedures or consumables.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which fuel and oil specifications, capacities and system modifications are documented for this example?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-before-operation-q01" }, { "text": "What inspection or functional-check evidence establishes correct control travel, security and system readiness?", "kind": "action", "id": "configuration-before-operation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "touring-and-ground-envelope", "name": "Touring and ground envelope", "description": "Determine the evidence needed to assess loading, flight suitability and movement on the ground.", "rationale": "The Leopard Moth's three-seat touring role must be translated into configuration-specific constraints, not historical performance promises.", "layers": [ { "id": "loading-and-performance", "name": "Loading and performance", "description": "Associate proposed occupancy and fuel with current mass properties and applicable performance information.", "findings": [ { "id": "three-seat-load-assessment", "name": "Three-seat load assessment", "description": "Treat seating capacity, payload and usable fuel as distinct constraints.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the proposed combination of occupants, baggage and fuel satisfy the documented mass and centre-of-gravity envelope?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "three-seat-load-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Which performance evidence applies to this engine, propeller, aircraft configuration and proposed operating conditions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "three-seat-load-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ground-and-storage-fit", "name": "Ground and storage fit", "description": "Establish dimensions, undercarriage configuration and supported handling methods.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-and-hangar-constraints", "name": "Movement and hangar constraints", "description": "Resolve clearances and handling provisions from the actual aircraft and applicable instructions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What measured dimensions and undercarriage or braking configuration govern towing, taxiing and hangar access?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "movement-and-hangar-constraints-q01" }, { "text": "Which instructions establish permitted handling points and any wing-folding or disassembly provisions?", "kind": "action", "id": "movement-and-hangar-constraints-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "continued-airworthiness", "name": "Continued airworthiness and permitted activity", "description": "Connect DH.85 technical evidence and aircraft condition to the prerequisites for a specified activity.", "rationale": "A surviving Leopard Moth may be a display object, restoration project or operational aircraft, each requiring different evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "applicable-technical-record", "name": "Applicable technical record", "description": "Determine which maintenance documents and notices actually apply to the DH.85 configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "moth-notice-applicability", "name": "Moth notice applicability", "description": "DHSL states that information for minority Moth types can occur in the Tiger Moth TNS volume and must be read with the appropriate type manual. [DHSL Moths](https://www.dhsupport.com/moth.php)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which maintenance-manual revision and Moth Technical News Sheets apply to this DH.85?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "moth-notice-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "Which applicable inspections, modifications or life limits remain overdue or unsupported by records?", "kind": "action", "id": "moth-notice-applicability-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "activity-eligibility", "name": "Activity eligibility", "description": "Evaluate documentary and physical prerequisites for display, ground running or flight.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-for-proposed-use", "name": "Evidence for proposed use", "description": "Keep preservation status, maintenance release and jurisdiction-specific authorisation distinct.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which current certificate, permit or other authority covers the proposed activity for this aircraft and jurisdiction?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "evidence-for-proposed-use-q01" }, { "text": "What unresolved defect, document gap or operating restriction prevents that activity from being supported?", "kind": "action", "id": "evidence-for-proposed-use-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This account is based on recall, without consulted sources.", "The nominal power figure refers to the commonly associated Gipsy Major engine; verify the engine installation and rating for a particular airframe.", "The hazards listed are construction- and configuration-related concerns, not claims about documented Leopard Moth accident frequencies." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "de Havilland aircraft type designation", "value_or_pattern": "D.H.85", "note": "Identifies the aircraft design; individual airframes have separate construction numbers and civil registrations." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Private touring and personal transport.", "Club flying and recreational aviation.", "Historic aircraft preservation and demonstration flying." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Seating capacity, including pilot", "typical_range": "3", "unit": "persons" }, { "quantity": "Nominal engine power", "typical_range": "130", "unit": "hp" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Moisture damage, wood deterioration and adhesive-joint degradation in the wooden structure.", "Deterioration of fabric covering through age, weather exposure or inadequate maintenance.", "Loss of directional control or ground looping during takeoff and landing, a hazard associated with conventional landing gear.", "Engine or fuel-system failure requiring a forced landing in a single-engine aircraft." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Airworthiness requirements and operating limitations for surviving aircraft depend on the country of registration and the individual aircraft's approval status." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "de Havilland Puss Moth", "difference": "The D.H.80 Puss Moth is an earlier, separate three-seat high-wing cabin aircraft design; the Leopard Moth is designated D.H.85." }, { "name": "de Havilland Tiger Moth", "difference": "The D.H.82 Tiger Moth is a two-seat open-cockpit biplane trainer, whereas the Leopard Moth is a three-seat cabin monoplane." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of de Havilland Leopard Moth this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative DH.85 manuals and drawings establish baseline dimensions, masses, fuel capacities and operating limits, and how do these vary across production examples?", "Which engine, propeller, brake, starter and electrical modifications are documented as accepted for particular Leopard Moth examples?", "What exact wing-folding or disassembly arrangements and securing inspections apply to the DH.85?", "Which DH.85-specific structural deterioration patterns and inspection requirements are established by technical notices or service evidence?", "Which certification basis and continuing-airworthiness requirements apply in each intended jurisdiction, including restrictions affecting passenger carriage or other proposed uses?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }