{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T11:47:41Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09570-a25e-74c3-8822-fba0992c446a\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 79.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09570-a253-7381-ba5a-54450ddf410d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China\nRegistry id: vr.tr.organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners-in-china\nPlane / domain: AC" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:44:31+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q847865", "registryId": "vr.tr.organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners-in-china", "name": "Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q847865/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.organ-harvesting-from-falun-gong-practitioners-in-china", "name": "Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China", "purpose": "Enable an agent to assess and document claims of non-consensual organ procurement from Falun Gong practitioners in China, distinguish evidentiary confidence from legal determinations, and identify justified protective or investigative actions.", "definition": "Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China refers to the reported non-consensual removal of organs from detained practitioners for transplantation, including allegations and independent tribunal findings that practitioners have been killed to obtain their organs.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the alleged practice and its documented or disputed instances, specifically the relationship between Falun Gong practitioner identity, coercive custody or control, organ procurement, and transplantation in China; it does not presume that every allegation establishes an event or that an established event establishes a nationwide pattern.", "in_scope": [ "Identification of alleged victims as Falun Gong practitioners and the evidentiary basis for that identification.", "Consent, coercion, detention, and circumstances surrounding alleged organ removal.", "Evidence supporting or challenging particular incidents and broader patterns.", "Alleged relationships among custodial institutions, procurement personnel, transplant facilities, intermediaries, and recipients.", "Attributed institutional assessments, responses, unresolved disputes, and protective actions." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Falun Gong beliefs, practices, and organisational history beyond what is needed to establish the relevant identity.", "Persecution of Falun Gong that has no evidenced connection to organ procurement.", "China's transplant system as a whole, except where it supplies relevant context or evidence.", "Organ trafficking involving other populations, except as explicitly distinguished comparative evidence.", "Clinical transplantation techniques and instructions for removing organs.", "General international criminal law doctrine independent of a specific attributed assessment." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The claim specifically identifies Falun Gong practitioners as organ sources; evidence about unidentified prisoners or other groups alone does not establish this connection.", "The alleged conduct concerns organ procurement without valid consent, rather than detention, medical examination, disappearance, or religious persecution alone.", "The alleged procurement has a specific geographical or institutional connection to China; a recipient's nationality alone is insufficient.", "The model distinguishes organs allegedly removed while a person was alive from procurement after death and records whether procurement allegedly caused death.", "A case-specific allegation, an estimate of prevalence, and a formal institutional determination remain separate assertions with separate evidentiary requirements." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Practitioner identification basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "self-identification; family or witness attribution; documentary identification; authority attribution; unknown; disputed", "why_it_matters": "The connection to Falun Gong is essential to the registered thing and must not be inferred from detention alone." }, { "name": "Incident time and location", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "linked alleged event, date or interval, custodial site, procurement site, and transplant site, each with uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Separating places and dates permits corroboration without assuming that custody, procurement, and transplantation occurred together." }, { "name": "Custody and consent assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "custody established, alleged, disputed, or unknown; consent independently substantiated, alleged, absent, invalidated by coercion, disputed, or unknown", "why_it_matters": "A consent record and a finding of voluntary consent are different assessments, particularly where the person was under coercive control." }, { "name": "Procurement and death relationship", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "removal allegedly caused death; removal allegedly preceded death; procurement allegedly followed death; sequence unknown or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Different sequences require different evidence and must not be collapsed into a single description." }, { "name": "Evidence independence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "original observation; independently corroborating source; derivative account; shared underlying source; dependency unknown", "why_it_matters": "Repeated publication of one account must not be counted as multiple independent confirmations." }, { "name": "Quantitative claim", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "people, organs, procedures, or facilities within a stated period and geography, with method, range, and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Victim counts, organ counts, and transplant counts are not interchangeable, and estimates require explicit assumptions." }, { "name": "Actor involvement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "alleged or established custody, examination, procurement, transplantation, brokerage, payment, oversight, or knowledge", "why_it_matters": "Institutional association alone does not establish participation, knowledge, or individual responsibility." }, { "name": "Assessment status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unassessed allegation; substantiated to a specified standard; unresolved; contradicted; withdrawn; formally determined by a named body", "why_it_matters": "An agent needs to preserve the assessor, date, scope, and evidentiary standard behind every conclusion." } ], "affordances": [ "Construct a source-linked incident account separating practitioner identification, custody, consent, procurement, and death claims.", "Compare competing accounts and trace apparently corroborating publications to their underlying evidence.", "Evaluate whether transplant statistics or institutional records support a Falun Gong-specific inference and expose assumptions that remain unverified.", "Map alleged institutional participation without converting proximity or association into established responsibility.", "Prepare a redacted evidence summary or preservation plan that protects witnesses and distinguishes allegations from determinations.", "Identify proportionate investigative, safeguarding, or transplant due-diligence steps supported by the available evidence." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Report allegations, findings and official responses with their sources and dates.", "Distinguish established findings from allegations and denials." ], "must_not": [ "Deny or minimize credible evidence of abuse or present allegations as proven without basis.", "Spread hostility against Chinese people or Falun Gong practitioners.", "Reveal the identities of witnesses or victims who could be endangered.", "Assist in any trade in organs." ], "requires_human": [ "Publishing claims about named individuals or institutions." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Forced organ removal would be a grave violation of human rights and medical ethics.", "Witnesses and families face retaliation, so their safety matters." ], "affected_parties": [ "Detained practitioners", "Families of victims", "Transplant patients and clinicians" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns it; responsibility lies with those who carried out or enabled the practice.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Not a visible thing; known through testimony, investigations and tribunal reports." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misinformation on either side harms victims and public trust.", "Witnesses can face retaliation." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "WHO Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Transplantation, World Health Organization.", "Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism, The Transplantation Society and International Society of Nephrology." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "This controversy is examined in human rights investigations, transplant ethics discussions and assessments of detention practices in China.", "Documentation distinguishes reported experiences, independently corroborated evidence, tribunal findings and determinations by courts with jurisdiction.", "It informs scrutiny of organ procurement consent, transplant tourism and institutional responsibility for preventing abusive transplantation practices." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q847865: Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q847865", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Forced organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_organ_harvesting_from_Falun_Gong_practitioners_in_China", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "practitioner-identity-and-case-boundaries", "name": "Practitioner identity and case boundaries", "description": "Establishes what qualifies as a claim about organ procurement from Falun Gong practitioners in China.", "rationale": "Evidence about persecution or transplant abuse in general cannot automatically establish the specific registered practice.", "layers": [ { "id": "falun-gong-identification", "name": "Falun Gong identification", "description": "Examines how alleged victims are identified and how identity relates to alleged targeting.", "findings": [ { "id": "identity-and-targeting-basis", "name": "Identity and targeting basis", "description": "Record practitioner identification separately from the claim that this identity motivated selection for organ procurement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who identifies the alleged victim as a Falun Gong practitioner, and on what firsthand or documentary basis?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "identity-and-targeting-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence connects practitioner identity to selection for organ procurement rather than only to detention or other mistreatment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "identity-and-targeting-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "incident-and-pattern-scope", "name": "Incident and pattern scope", "description": "Separates individual allegations from claims about recurring or coordinated practice.", "findings": [ { "id": "unit-of-allegation", "name": "Unit of allegation", "description": "Define the people, period, locations, and conduct covered by each assertion before assessing its truth.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this assertion concern an identifiable person, an institution, a regional pattern, or a nationwide practice?", "kind": "definition", "id": "unit-of-allegation-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence supports extending a particular incident to the broader population, period, or institutional network claimed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "unit-of-allegation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "custody-consent-and-procurement", "name": "Custody, consent, and procurement", "description": "Examines the alleged transition from coercive control to organ removal and its relationship to death.", "rationale": "The model must establish the alleged abusive conduct without treating detention or medical testing as proof of procurement.", "layers": [ { "id": "coercive-control-and-consent", "name": "Coercive control and consent", "description": "Assesses the person's freedom and the evidentiary basis for claims about authorisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "consent-under-custody", "name": "Consent under custody", "description": "Record custody conditions, purported consent, and evidence bearing on voluntariness and authenticity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes who controlled the person before the alleged procurement and whether refusal was possible?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "consent-under-custody-q01" }, { "text": "If consent is asserted, who supplied the record and what independent evidence establishes its authenticity, scope, and voluntariness?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "consent-under-custody-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "examination-removal-and-death", "name": "Examination, removal, and death", "description": "Distinguishes possible preparatory activity from organ procurement and establishes the alleged sequence.", "findings": [ { "id": "procurement-sequence", "name": "Procurement sequence", "description": "Assess medical examinations, alleged removal, transplantation, and death as distinct claims requiring explicit links.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence links reported blood tests or organ examinations to procurement rather than to another stated or plausible purpose?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "procurement-sequence-q01" }, { "text": "What supports the claimed removal of a particular organ and the sequence between removal, death determination, and transplantation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "procurement-sequence-q02" }, { "text": "Which parts of the alleged sequence remain inferred because medical records, remains, or direct witnesses are unavailable?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "procurement-sequence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-scale-assessment", "name": "Evidence and scale assessment", "description": "Evaluates source independence, contrary evidence, and the assumptions behind estimates.", "rationale": "The model needs to distinguish supported claims from repetition and distinguish transplant-system observations from victim-group attribution.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-lineage-and-corroboration", "name": "Source lineage and corroboration", "description": "Tracks how testimony, records, recordings, and published assessments relate to their original evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "independent-evidence-chain", "name": "Independent evidence chain", "description": "Record access to original material, authentication, translation, dependencies, contradictions, and opportunities for verification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which claims derive from direct observation or original records, and which repeat the same underlying testimony or investigation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "independent-evidence-chain-q01" }, { "text": "How were recordings, documents, translations, and witness accounts authenticated, and what material challenges their interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "independent-evidence-chain-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "transplant-data-and-victim-estimates", "name": "Transplant data and victim estimates", "description": "Tests quantitative arguments involving transplant activity and alleged Falun Gong victimisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "group-specific-estimation", "name": "Group-specific estimation", "description": "Keep observed quantities, estimated quantities, and assumptions assigning organs to Falun Gong practitioners explicit.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the units, period, coverage, missing data, and uncertainty of any transplant-volume or victim estimate?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "group-specific-estimation-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports attributing an estimated share of transplants specifically to Falun Gong practitioners?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "group-specific-estimation-q02" }, { "text": "How does the estimate change when assumptions about facility capacity, donor sources, multiple organs per donor, and duplicate reporting change?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "group-specific-estimation-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutional-links-and-responsibility", "name": "Institutional links and responsibility", "description": "Examines alleged operational relationships and distinguishes involvement from authority or knowledge.", "rationale": "Claims about organised procurement require evidence connecting specific functions and actors, rather than guilt by institutional association.", "layers": [ { "id": "custody-to-transplant-links", "name": "Custody-to-transplant links", "description": "Maps alleged transfers of people, information, organs, and payments across institutions.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-functional-connections", "name": "Documented functional connections", "description": "Record each alleged connection between custodial sites, medical personnel, transplant facilities, and intermediaries with its own evidentiary status.", "questions": [ { "text": "What records or testimony connect a specific custodial institution to a specific procurement or transplant facility?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-functional-connections-q01" }, { "text": "Do alleged transfers, compatibility records, scheduling communications, or payments establish an operational link, and where does the chain remain incomplete?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-functional-connections-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "knowledge-direction-and-benefit", "name": "Knowledge, direction, and benefit", "description": "Separates alleged participation, awareness, coordination, and financial benefit.", "findings": [ { "id": "actor-specific-responsibility", "name": "Actor-specific responsibility", "description": "Assess what each named actor allegedly did or knew without deriving individual responsibility solely from position or affiliation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports the allegation that a particular actor knew the organ source or the absence of valid consent?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "actor-specific-responsibility-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes evidence of local participation from evidence of direction, authorisation, or coordination at a broader level?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "actor-specific-responsibility-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessments-protection-and-review", "name": "Assessments, protection, and review", "description": "Records attributed conclusions and supports responses calibrated to evidence, uncertainty, and witness exposure.", "rationale": "An agent must preserve the status of contested conclusions while enabling justified investigation and protection.", "layers": [ { "id": "attributed-determinations-and-responses", "name": "Attributed determinations and responses", "description": "Distinguishes investigative findings, advocacy claims, official responses, and legal assessments by their authority and method.", "findings": [ { "id": "assessment-authority-and-standard", "name": "Assessment authority and standard", "description": "Record each assessing body's mandate, evidence access, standard, conclusion, date, and treatment of contrary material.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which body made the assessment, under what mandate and evidentiary standard, and with access to which underlying materials?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "assessment-authority-and-standard-q01" }, { "text": "What specific allegations do official denials or alternative accounts address, and what independently checkable evidence accompanies them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "assessment-authority-and-standard-q02" }, { "text": "Does a proposed legal characterisation reflect a named body's determination, an analyst's argument, or an unresolved question?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "assessment-authority-and-standard-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "protective-action-and-reassessment", "name": "Protective action and reassessment", "description": "Connects uncertainty to evidence preservation, confidentiality, due diligence, and conditions for updating conclusions.", "findings": [ { "id": "proportionate-next-steps", "name": "Proportionate next steps", "description": "Identify justified actions while limiting disclosure of victim, witness, and family information.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence-preservation, referral, or transplant-source due-diligence action is justified by the current assessment?", "kind": "action", "id": "proportionate-next-steps-q01" }, { "text": "Which identifying details require restriction because disclosure could expose practitioners, witnesses, or relatives to harm?", "kind": "action", "id": "proportionate-next-steps-q02" }, { "text": "What new records, independent access, or corroboration would materially strengthen, narrow, or overturn the assessment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "proportionate-next-steps-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The independent China Tribunal concluded that forced organ harvesting occurred and that Falun Gong practitioners were a principal source; it was a nongovernmental people's tribunal, not a state or international criminal court.", "UN human-rights experts have expressed concern about reports of forced organ harvesting involving detained minorities, including Falun Gong practitioners; those communications should not be represented as judicial determinations.", "Victim totals, institutional responsibility, geographic extent and continuation over time require source-specific verification; no numerical estimate is asserted here." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "World Health Organization Guiding Principles on Human Cell, Tissue and Organ Transplantation address consent, organ commercialization, transparency and traceability.", "World Medical Association Statement on Organ and Tissue Donation opposes procuring transplant organs from executed prisoners.", "The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism sets professional ethical principles against organ trafficking and transplant tourism; it is not itself binding law." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Human-rights investigations into the treatment of detained Falun Gong practitioners.", "Assessment of organ-source transparency and consent in transplantation.", "Ethical scrutiny of transplant tourism and international transplantation collaborations.", "Legislative and policy debates concerning forced organ harvesting." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Non-consensual organ removal can cause death, permanent disability and severe suffering.", "Detention and coercion undermine the possibility of freely given donor consent.", "Opaque donor records can prevent verification of organ provenance and accountability.", "Extrapolating victim totals from transplant capacity, waiting times or testimony without validated assumptions can produce unreliable estimates.", "Conflating allegations, corroborated observations, tribunal conclusions and government statements can misrepresent the strength of particular claims." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Chinese authorities deny harvesting organs from Falun Gong practitioners; investigators and human-rights advocates dispute those denials.", "Evidence and allegations concern particular detention facilities, hospitals and periods within China; they do not establish identical practices at every institution." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Forced organ harvesting", "difference": "The broader category concerns non-consensual organ procurement from any population; this entry specifically concerns Falun Gong practitioners in China." }, { "name": "Organ trafficking", "difference": "Organ trafficking encompasses illicit procurement and transactions involving organs; it does not necessarily involve Falun Gong practitioners or killing donors." }, { "name": "Organ procurement from executed prisoners", "difference": "This concerns organs taken following execution; the allegations here include prisoners of conscience killed specifically to supply organs." }, { "name": "Persecution of Falun Gong", "difference": "Persecution encompasses detention, coercion and other abuses; organ harvesting is a specific alleged and investigated practice within that broader subject." }, { "name": "Transplant tourism", "difference": "This concerns travel for transplantation under ethically problematic conditions; travel alone does not establish that organs came from Falun Gong practitioners." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Organ harvesting from Falun Gong practitioners in China this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which individual allegations can be independently corroborated across practitioner identity, custody, lack of valid consent, and actual organ procurement?", "What evidence can distinguish organs sourced from Falun Gong practitioners from other sources in aggregate transplant data?", "What defensible bounds, if any, can be placed on the number of affected people and the geographical and temporal extent of the practice?", "What evidence establishes institutional coordination or higher-level knowledge beyond particular facilities or individuals?", "What independently verifiable evidence can establish continuation, cessation, or change over time, and how should restricted access affect confidence?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 30 } }