{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:21:29Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.0, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b3-d655-7bc0-95ed-c64210066bc8\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Candidatus\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: SOC.ORG\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regi", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 81.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094b3-d640-7a42-a537-114f57fb10ea\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Candidatus\nRegistry id: vr.tr.candidatus\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.ORG\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:49:49+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "standards_and_regulation" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q857968", "registryId": "vr.tr.candidatus", "name": "Candidatus", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.ORG" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q857968/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.candidatus", "name": "Candidatus", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, assess and track Candidatus nomenclatural status for prokaryotic names without confusing naming status with biological identity.", "definition": "Candidatus is a Latin designation meaning candidate, used in distinct taxonomic, academic and historical contexts, so the label alone does not identify a particular organisation or institution.", "scope_statement": "Provisionally interpret vr.tr.candidatus as the prokaryotic nomenclatural designation; own its applicability, evidence requirements, code-dependent standing and transitions, pending confirmation of the registry referent because SOC / SOC.ORG does not establish this meaning.", "in_scope": [ "Disambiguation of the registry label and identification of the governing nomenclatural framework", "Conditions for applying Candidatus to a prokaryotic name", "Evidence linking the designation to a described taxon", "Publication, spelling and nomenclatural status under a specified code version", "Changes in designation and relationships to subsequent names" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Candidatus academic degrees and historical personal titles", "Governance and legal identity of nomenclatural organisations", "Complete biological models of individual bacteria or archaea", "Laboratory cultivation and sequencing protocols", "Independent reconstruction of taxonomic classifications" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The designation qualifies a prokaryotic name; it does not itself identify an organism, organisation or academic qualification.", "Candidatus status must be recorded separately from taxonomic rank and the taxon's placement.", "An uncultivated organism or environmental sequence does not by itself establish that a Candidatus name has been proposed.", "The applicable code and date matter: revised ICNP provisions allow pro-valid publication and related pro-statuses, so a blanket assertion that every Candidatus name lacks nomenclatural standing is unsuitable. [ICNP Rules 66-73](https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006638)", "The appearance of Candidatus in a database label is evidence of usage, requiring separate verification of its publication status." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent confirmation", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "prokaryotic designation confirmed | alternative meaning confirmed | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "The undefined registry entry and organisational classification leave the intended meaning uncertain." }, { "name": "Qualified name and rank", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Link to the exact taxon name, its recorded spelling and separately established rank", "why_it_matters": "Prevents treating Candidatus as a genus or rank." }, { "name": "Governing framework", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Nomenclatural code, applicable revision, rule references and assessment date", "why_it_matters": "Determines which requirements and status categories apply." }, { "name": "Publication standing", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Recorded separately by framework: proposed, pro-validly published, validly published, unverified or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates an author's naming proposal from established publication standing." }, { "name": "Cultivation evidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Not reported | cultivation unsuccessful under reported conditions | enrichment or co-culture reported | pure culture reported", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes limited cultivation evidence from an unsupported claim of intrinsic unculturability." }, { "name": "Diagnostic evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to descriptions, sequence accessions, specimens, images and other distinguishing observations", "why_it_matters": "Connects a proposed name to inspectable evidence about its intended taxon." }, { "name": "Nomenclatural history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Dated links to original proposals, corrections, status announcements and successor names", "why_it_matters": "Supports current interpretation while preserving historical usage." } ], "affordances": [ "Disambiguate a Candidatus label before assigning the registry model.", "Check a proposed designation against the applicable nomenclatural rules.", "Link the qualified name to its description and diagnostic evidence.", "Report missing evidence and unresolved standing without assigning an unsupported status.", "Reconcile historical and current names while preserving the cited naming framework.", "Prepare an evidence-backed status update for review without claiming that the agent confers nomenclatural standing." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain the different senses of Candidatus, such as a provisional status in prokaryote naming or a historical academic title.", "Use the term in the form the relevant naming code or institution sets.", "Ask for or use context before linking the label to a particular organism, degree or institution." ], "must_not": [ "Treat Candidatus as the name of a single organisation or institution.", "Present a Candidatus organism name as a validly published species name.", "Award or claim an academic candidate title on a person's behalf without the institution's record.", "Merge records from different senses of the term into one entity." ], "requires_human": [ "Correcting a published name or record where the wrong sense of Candidatus was used." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Confusing provisional and valid names misleads science and medicine.", "Academic titles are earned, so misattributing them misleads the public." ], "affected_parties": [ "Microbiologists and clinicians", "Holders of academic titles", "Database users" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns the label; naming committees and awarding institutions answer for its use in each field.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Ambiguous use of the label causes records from unrelated fields to be merged.", "Provisional organism names can be mistaken for established species." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes, International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q857968: Candidatus", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q857968", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Candidatus", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candidatus", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "designation-and-referent", "name": "Designation and referent", "description": "Establish what Candidatus denotes in this entry and how it qualifies a name.", "rationale": "An undefined label must be disambiguated before a biological nomenclature model can be applied.", "layers": [ { "id": "registry-meaning", "name": "Registry meaning", "description": "Resolve the intended sense and the unexplained organisational classification.", "findings": [ { "id": "originating-concept", "name": "Originating concept", "description": "Identify the upstream concept rather than inferring its identity solely from its label or plane.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which upstream identifier and source description establish the intended meaning of vr.tr.candidatus?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "originating-concept-q01" }, { "text": "Does that evidence identify a prokaryotic designation, an academic title or another referent?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "originating-concept-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "qualified-name", "name": "Qualified name", "description": "Separate the designation from the name and taxonomic rank it accompanies.", "findings": [ { "id": "designation-name-separation", "name": "Designation-name separation", "description": "Preserve the exact published expression while identifying its constituent roles.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exact name is qualified by Candidatus in the cited description?", "kind": "definition", "id": "designation-name-separation-q01" }, { "text": "Which source establishes the taxonomic rank independently of the Candidatus designation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "designation-name-separation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "applicability-and-evidence", "name": "Applicability and evidence", "description": "Assess the basis for applying the designation to a described prokaryotic taxon.", "rationale": "The model must distinguish a supported naming proposal from an unexplained label attached to sequence data.", "layers": [ { "id": "cultivation-context", "name": "Cultivation context", "description": "Record cultivation evidence and the stated reason for using Candidatus.", "findings": [ { "id": "designation-basis", "name": "Designation basis", "description": "Keep reported cultivation limitations distinct from assumptions about what can never be cultured.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reason does the proposing publication give for applying Candidatus?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "designation-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence concern absent cultivation attempts, failed attempts, enrichment, co-culture or an available pure culture?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "designation-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "diagnostic-support", "name": "Diagnostic support", "description": "Connect the name to observations that distinguish its intended taxon.", "findings": [ { "id": "inspectable-description", "name": "Inspectable description", "description": "Identify accessible diagnostic evidence and assess it against the selected rules without inventing universal thresholds.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which sequence accessions, morphological observations, host associations or other diagnostics support the description?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inspectable-description-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence requirements remain unmet under the applicable code version?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "inspectable-description-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "rules-and-publication-standing", "name": "Rules and publication standing", "description": "Determine how a particular naming framework treats the designation and its publication.", "rationale": "Historical and revised rules cannot safely be collapsed into one timeless provisional-status flag.", "layers": [ { "id": "applicable-rule-set", "name": "Applicable rule set", "description": "Anchor the assessment in a named code, revision and effective period.", "findings": [ { "id": "dated-status-assessment", "name": "Dated status assessment", "description": "Record rule-dependent status rather than treating the prefix as sufficient evidence of standing.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which code revision and provisions govern the status being assessed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "dated-status-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Is the assessment describing standing at original publication or standing under subsequently adopted rules?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "dated-status-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "publication-verification", "name": "Publication verification", "description": "Verify the publication events and official records supporting each claimed status.", "findings": [ { "id": "standing-evidence", "name": "Standing evidence", "description": "Separate original proposal, database usage and qualifying nomenclatural publication.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original publication and subsequent list or announcement substantiate the claimed standing?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "standing-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What may the agent report when the name is indexed but qualifying publication evidence has not been verified?", "kind": "action", "id": "standing-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "name-continuity-and-transitions", "name": "Name continuity and transitions", "description": "Track corrections, competing treatments and later changes without erasing earlier usage.", "rationale": "New evidence or nomenclatural action can change a name's treatment while historical records retain the earlier designation.", "layers": [ { "id": "parallel-name-treatment", "name": "Parallel name treatment", "description": "Reconcile variant spellings and names evaluated under different frameworks.", "findings": [ { "id": "cross-framework-identity", "name": "Cross-framework identity", "description": "Require evidence before treating similar names or records under different codes as interchangeable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Are the compared records spelling variants, synonyms, different taxon circumscriptions or names governed by different codes?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cross-framework-identity-q01" }, { "text": "Which description, reference material or explicit nomenclatural treatment supports linking them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "cross-framework-identity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "status-change", "name": "Status change", "description": "Determine when evidence warrants updating the designation or linking a successor name.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-transition", "name": "Supported transition", "description": "Distinguish a biological development such as cultivation from a documented nomenclatural change.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which publication or formal action establishes the transition, and on what date?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-transition-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent update current standing, add a successor-name relation or retain an unresolved transition pending evidence?", "kind": "action", "id": "supported-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The SOC.ORG domain code does not resolve the ambiguity; check the originating registry identifier and description before selecting a sense.", "The uses listed are alternative meanings recalled from general knowledge, not verified attributes of this registry entry.", "No specific organisation, identifier or governing standard can confidently be assigned from the supplied information." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Candidatus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In prokaryotic taxonomy, Candidatus designates provisionally named taxa for which the requirements for conventional nomenclatural standing have not been met.", "In some European academic traditions, candidatus appears in Latin degree titles.", "In late Roman and Byzantine history, candidati refers to a category of imperial guards." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Candidatus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating the taxonomic designation as an organisation.", "Conflating an academic qualification, a historical guard designation and a nomenclatural category because they share the same Latin word." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Candidatus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Candidate", "difference": "The general role of someone seeking selection or qualification does not establish any specialised meaning of Candidatus." }, { "name": "Candidati", "difference": "The historical plural can denote imperial guards; identifying this sense requires historical context." }, { "name": "Prokaryotic taxon", "difference": "A taxon is the biological group being named; Candidatus is a designation applied to its name." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Candidatus this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the upstream registry identifier confirm the prokaryotic designation, and what explains its SOC / SOC.ORG assignment?", "Does an existing Vercy nomenclatural-status model already cover this concept, requiring a link instead of a separate publication?", "Which current ICNP provisions and transitional decisions must govern assessment of older Candidatus proposals?", "How should this catalogue represent parallel ICNP and SeqCode treatments without implying automatic equivalence?", "Which authoritative records should resolve disagreements between original descriptions, subsequent announcements and database labels?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 12, "questions": 20 } }