{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T08:53:53Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d1-b05d-7e10-8480-beba42be023c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: crew cut\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regist", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 68.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094d1-b051-7462-b842-5900bd70936f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: crew cut\nRegistry id: vr.tr.crew-cut\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:45:39+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners", "visual_identification" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q863338", "registryId": "vr.tr.crew-cut", "name": "crew cut", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q863338/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.crew-cut", "name": "crew cut", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a crew cut, assess how a particular haircut matches the intended form, and identify suitable cutting, styling or maintenance actions.", "definition": "A crew cut is a short haircut in which the upright hair on top generally graduates from greater length at the front to shorter length at the crown, with the sides and back cut short and tapered.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the crew cut as a recognisable haircut form and the decisions specific to creating and maintaining it: a short upright top, typically graduated from a longer front toward a shorter crown, with shorter sides and back.", "in_scope": [ "The top profile, including front-to-crown length graduation", "The relationship between the top, sides and back", "Boundaries with buzz cuts, flat tops and Ivy League cuts", "How hair texture, density and growth direction affect the intended crew-cut form", "The requested finish, cutting constraints and maintenance state" ], "out_of_scope": [ "A general taxonomy of all hairstyles", "The full barbering service, including appointment and payment management", "Clipper, trimmer and scissor specifications", "Diagnosis or treatment of scalp and hair conditions", "Military or institutional grooming policies themselves", "Claims about a wearer's personality, occupation or identity" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The top normally has a deliberate front-to-crown graduation; a uniformly short all-over clipper cut does not establish this feature.", "The front retains enough relative length to contribute to the upper silhouette, while the crown is shorter; exact length thresholds require an agreed reference.", "The sides and back are shorter than the upper front, but a skin fade is optional and cannot by itself identify a crew cut.", "A deliberately level, shelf-like top suggests a flat top; the boundary with variants called flat-top crew cuts needs explicit terminology.", "A longer top intended to lie over or form a sustained side part may approach an Ivy League cut; classification should consider both the requested shape and local naming practice." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Top length profile", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Millimetres of hair length at the front, mid-top and crown, with measurement method recorded", "why_it_matters": "Shows whether the haircut has the graduation central to the intended crew-cut form." }, { "name": "Top silhouette", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Graduated upright profile; level platform; uniform crop; laid-over profile; mixed or uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Helps distinguish a crew cut from neighbouring short haircut forms." }, { "name": "Side and back transition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Scissor taper; clipper taper; fade with specified height; disconnected; other agreed finish", "why_it_matters": "Records a variable finish without treating one fade type as the definition of a crew cut." }, { "name": "Front-to-side length relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Relative lengths at identified front and side reference points", "why_it_matters": "Captures the contrast between the retained upper front and shorter perimeter." }, { "name": "Hair response at target length", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Stands without product; stands with styling; lies down; curls or coils into a different apparent profile; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether the requested silhouette is achievable under the wearer's intended routine." }, { "name": "Growth-pattern constraints", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Location and direction of crown whorls, front growth patterns and other relevant directional changes", "why_it_matters": "Supports length adjustments where a uniform cutting approach would produce unintended protrusions or exposed areas." }, { "name": "Agreement with reference", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Agreed target; achieved; partly achieved with recorded differences; disputed; not assessed", "why_it_matters": "Separates the haircut's name from the specific result the wearer approved." }, { "name": "Maintenance condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Intended profile retained; perimeter grown out; top no longer holds intended shape; uneven growth apparent; reassessment requested", "why_it_matters": "Makes maintenance decisions depend on observed changes rather than an assumed universal interval." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a requested or observed haircut with crew-cut references and flag ambiguous naming.", "Translate a reference into front, crown, side and back targets that a barber can confirm.", "Identify adjustments needed for growth direction, density and the wearer's styling routine.", "Assess the finished haircut for top graduation, transition continuity and agreement with the requested silhouette.", "Recommend which areas need reshaping as the cut grows out.", "Explain the visible consequences of choosing a taper, fade or different amount of front length." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the crew cut and its history and variations.", "Show reference images with credit and the subjects' consent." ], "must_not": [ "Cut a person's hair without their consent.", "Force or pressure a person into a haircut, such as in schools or institutions, without lawful basis.", "Associate the style with a group in a demeaning or stereotyped way.", "Use clippers with a guard that does not match what the person asked for." ], "requires_human": [ "Cutting the hair of a child or a person who cannot consent." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Haircuts can be imposed as control or punishment, which violates dignity.", "Hair is tied to identity, culture and religion." ], "affected_parties": [ "People whose hair is cut", "Children in institutions", "Barbers" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "The person wearing it; nobody else.", "master_systems": [] }, "visual_identification": [ "Very short hair on the sides and back, tapering upward.", "The top is slightly longer, standing upright and shortest at the crown." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Clipper cuts and skin irritation.", "Exposed scalp can sunburn." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "A crew cut is encountered in barbering, personal grooming and settings where a short hairstyle is preferred.", "It provides a compact shape with short sides and back while retaining graduated length across the top.", "Reference images and discussion help establish the intended front length, taper and overall silhouette." ], "facets_not_applicable": { "interfaces": "No universal official standard defines this haircut, while professional hygiene and grooming requirements depend on jurisdiction and setting." } }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q863338: crew cut", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q863338", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Crew cut", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crew_cut", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "crew-cut-identity", "name": "Crew-cut identity", "description": "Establishes what the name denotes for this request and where neighbouring haircut names overlap.", "rationale": "An agent must recognise the intended haircut through its shape rather than accept the label as a complete specification.", "layers": [ { "id": "defining-top-form", "name": "Defining top form", "description": "Examines the short top and its front-to-crown graduation.", "findings": [ { "id": "graduation-and-silhouette", "name": "Graduation and silhouette", "description": "Record both hair lengths and the resulting silhouette; hair length and visible height are not interchangeable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the intended crew cut retain a longer front and shorten toward the crown?", "kind": "definition", "id": "graduation-and-silhouette-q01" }, { "text": "What are the front, mid-top and crown lengths, and how were they measured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "graduation-and-silhouette-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-cut-boundaries", "name": "Neighbouring cut boundaries", "description": "Separates the intended form from similar short cuts while retaining naming uncertainty.", "findings": [ { "id": "reference-over-label", "name": "Reference over label", "description": "Record whether the requested shape is uniformly cropped, graduated, platform-shaped or laid over, and preserve the name used by the wearer or barber.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which visible feature separates this request from a uniform buzz cut, flat top or Ivy League cut?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "reference-over-label-q01" }, { "text": "Who supplied the crew-cut label, and which photograph or description establishes what they mean?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reference-over-label-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "top-and-perimeter-design", "name": "Top and perimeter design", "description": "Turns the chosen crew-cut form into an agreed profile and side-and-back finish.", "rationale": "Recognisably similar crew cuts can differ substantially in front length, transition height and exposed scalp.", "layers": [ { "id": "front-and-crown-targets", "name": "Front and crown targets", "description": "Defines how much length remains at the front and how the top reaches the crown.", "findings": [ { "id": "retained-front-profile", "name": "Retained front profile", "description": "Specify the desired front height and crown coverage using the wearer's hair response, rather than assuming one clipper setting defines the result.", "questions": [ { "text": "How much front length or apparent height should remain relative to the crown?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "retained-front-profile-q01" }, { "text": "Should the front stand naturally, be lightly styled upward, or follow another explicitly agreed profile?", "kind": "action", "id": "retained-front-profile-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "side-and-back-finish", "name": "Side and back finish", "description": "Specifies the perimeter and its connection to the graduated top.", "findings": [ { "id": "transition-and-exposure", "name": "Transition and scalp exposure", "description": "Treat taper or fade choice, transition height and minimum side length as explicit options within the requested crew cut.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where should the shortest side-and-back area end, and how much scalp exposure is wanted?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "transition-and-exposure-q01" }, { "text": "What transition should connect the shorter perimeter to the retained top without an unintended ridge?", "kind": "action", "id": "transition-and-exposure-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "hair-response-and-feasibility", "name": "Hair response and feasibility", "description": "Assesses how the wearer's hair will behave at the proposed crew-cut lengths.", "rationale": "The same nominal lengths can produce different silhouettes and coverage, so the model must connect the target form to observed hair behaviour.", "layers": [ { "id": "texture-and-coverage", "name": "Texture and coverage", "description": "Relates strand behaviour and density to the short upright top and shorter perimeter.", "findings": [ { "id": "length-does-not-fix-appearance", "name": "Length does not fix appearance", "description": "Record how curl, coil, stiffness and density affect apparent height and scalp visibility at the proposed lengths.", "questions": [ { "text": "At the proposed top lengths, does the hair stand, lie down, curl or coil, and under what styling conditions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "length-does-not-fix-appearance-q01" }, { "text": "Which length adjustments would preserve the agreed crew-cut outline and desired coverage?", "kind": "action", "id": "length-does-not-fix-appearance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "directional-growth", "name": "Directional growth", "description": "Examines crown whorls and front growth directions that affect graduation and upright styling.", "findings": [ { "id": "local-length-adjustments", "name": "Local length adjustments", "description": "Identify where the growth pattern calls for a departure from a simple front-to-back length progression.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where do growth directions change, and how do those areas behave when dry at short lengths?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "local-length-adjustments-q01" }, { "text": "Should additional length be retained at the crown or front to avoid an unwanted protrusion or exposed patch?", "kind": "action", "id": "local-length-adjustments-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "execution-and-upkeep", "name": "Execution and upkeep", "description": "Supports approval of the cutting target, inspection of the result and maintenance as the crew cut grows.", "rationale": "A useful model must connect recognition of the style to concrete cutting decisions and observable reasons to reshape it.", "layers": [ { "id": "cutting-target-and-review", "name": "Cutting target and review", "description": "Checks that the wearer-approved lengths and finish produce the intended crew-cut form.", "findings": [ { "id": "approved-lengths-and-finished-shape", "name": "Approved lengths and finished shape", "description": "Confirm the retained front, shortest areas and transition before cutting; review the completed silhouette in its intended everyday styling state.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has the wearer agreed to the front length, shortest perimeter length and any proposed scalp exposure?", "kind": "action", "id": "approved-lengths-and-finished-shape-q01" }, { "text": "Does the dry finished cut show the agreed top graduation and side-and-back transition when viewed from the front, side and rear?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "approved-lengths-and-finished-shape-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "growth-and-restoration", "name": "Growth and restoration", "description": "Tracks changes that weaken the intended crew-cut profile or increase styling effort.", "findings": [ { "id": "maintenance-trigger", "name": "Maintenance trigger", "description": "Base upkeep on the loss of the agreed shape or finish, distinguishing perimeter cleanup from reshaping the top.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has growth changed the front-to-crown silhouette, softened the perimeter transition or increased the effort needed to hold the front?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "maintenance-trigger-q01" }, { "text": "Would restoring this crew cut require only side-and-back work, top reshaping, or a revised target?", "kind": "action", "id": "maintenance-trigger-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Interpreted as the hairstyle; no separate sense was supplied.", "Terminology overlaps across barbers and regions, especially for long crew cuts, Ivy League cuts and flat tops.", "No universal length specification or dedicated identifier is asserted; subtype terminology should be checked before formal classification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Short crew cut", "Long crew cut", "Flat-top crew cut" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Everyday grooming for people seeking a short hairstyle requiring little styling.", "Military and athletic grooming, subject to the requirements of the particular organisation.", "Barbering instruction in tapering and graduating short hair." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "An uneven transition between the top and sides can produce unintended ridges or steps.", "Hair growth direction and crown whorls can prevent the intended upright profile.", "Close clipping can irritate or nick the scalp.", "Inadequately cleaned shared cutting equipment can transmit skin infections." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Barbers differ in how they distinguish a long crew cut from an Ivy League haircut.", "Military associations are common, but a crew cut does not denote one internationally uniform military haircut." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Buzz cut", "difference": "Buzz cut is a broader term for very short, usually clipper-cut hairstyles; a crew cut specifically shapes and graduates the top." }, { "name": "Butch cut", "difference": "A butch cut keeps the top relatively uniform in length, whereas a crew cut generally leaves the front longer than the crown." }, { "name": "Ivy League haircut", "difference": "An Ivy League generally retains enough top and front length for side parting or combing; its boundary with a long crew cut is conventional." }, { "name": "Flat top", "difference": "A flat top is defined by an approximately level upper surface of upright hair; an ordinary crew cut need not create that surface." }, { "name": "High and tight", "difference": "A high and tight emphasises very closely cut sides extending high up the head and a retained top section, rather than the crew cut's graduated top profile." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of crew cut this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which barbering references establish the defining crew-cut profile, and how consistently do they require front-to-crown graduation?", "How do regional and professional naming practices distinguish crew cuts from Ivy League cuts and flat-top crew cuts?", "Are any numerical length ranges sufficiently consistent to aid recognition without excluding accepted variants?", "How should recognition criteria describe crew cuts across straight, wavy, curly and coily hair without treating one texture as the default?", "Does the registry's ACT / ACT.ACT placement intend the haircutting activity, the resulting hairstyle, or both, and is an existing model authoritative for either?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }