{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:48:13Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09503-492f-7d61-ab0f-9bdee6edbcae\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fokker F-10\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 reg", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 77.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a09503-4920-7c31-b8f0-0a8d75a909ed\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Fokker F-10\nRegistry id: vr.tr.fokker-f-10\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\n" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:50:36+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "owners" ] }, "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T10:10:33+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q868346", "registryId": "vr.tr.fokker-f-10", "name": "Fokker F-10", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q868346/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.fokker-f-10", "name": "Fokker F-10", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the Fokker F-10 aircraft type, distinguish its configurations, and determine what evidence is needed to assess an associated aircraft or proposed intervention.", "definition": "The Fokker F-10 is a family of American-built, three-engined, high-wing passenger transport aircraft developed from the Fokker F.VII and introduced in the late 1920s, combining a wooden wing with a fabric-covered steel-tube fuselage.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the type-level identity, configuration distinctions, operating constraints, and condition-assessment requirements of vr.tr.fokker-f-10 within PHY / PHY.OBJ; individual aircraft supply evidence to these requirements without becoming separate type definitions.", "in_scope": [ "F-10 identification and the boundary between the base designation and F-10A", "Airframe configuration and wooden-wing assessment requirements", "Three-engine propulsion configuration and associated control dependencies", "Configuration-specific dimensions, loading limits, and performance evidence", "Historical certification, inspection restrictions, and intervention eligibility" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The broader category of trimotor passenger aircraft", "Independent models of related Fokker aircraft types", "Complete maintenance histories and ownership records of individual airframes", "Engine and propeller designs beyond their installation interfaces", "Airline organisations, route networks, and business histories", "The 1931 accident as a separately modelled historical event" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require documentary identification as F-10; the Smithsonian records an aircraft bearing the marking 'Fokker F-Ten', but a painted name alone cannot establish identity. [Smithsonian aircraft photograph](https://www.si.edu/object/npm_A.2008-6)", "Check the three-engine piston-airliner configuration; this excludes single-engine Fokkers but does not uniquely identify an F-10. [Smithsonian F-10A model record](https://www.si.edu/es/object/model-static-fokker-f-10a-tri-motor-pan-american-world-airways%3Anasm_A19791464000)", "Check wooden-wing construction against documentary evidence when distinguishing the F-10 from visually similar trimotors; ICAO identifies wooden structural deterioration in its account of the 1931 F-10 accident. [ICAO historical account](https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/postalhistory/aviation_history_fokker_the_oldest_manufacterer.htm)", "Preserve an explicit F-10A designation rather than silently treating all F-10 records as one technical configuration; the Smithsonian separately identifies F-10A material. [Smithsonian F-10A model record](https://www.si.edu/es/object/model-static-fokker-f-10a-tri-motor-pan-american-world-airways%3Anasm_A19791464000)" ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Documented designation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "F-10; F-10A; F-10 family with variant unresolved; conflicting identification", "why_it_matters": "Controls which specifications may be applied without combining distinct configurations." }, { "name": "Identity evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to manufacturer records, approval documents, serial evidence, and dated photographs", "why_it_matters": "Separates a supported type identification from a caption or livery-based guess." }, { "name": "Installed propulsion configuration", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Engine and propeller models by centre, port, and starboard installation", "why_it_matters": "Three engines alone do not establish power, compatibility, or operating limits." }, { "name": "Rated engine output", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kW per engine, retaining original hp convention, rating conditions, and source", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a rating from one variant or replacement installation being applied to another." }, { "name": "Airframe dimensions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Wingspan, length, and height in m, qualified by variant and configuration", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification, handling, and storage while exposing conflicting specifications." }, { "name": "Loading envelope", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Mass in kg; centre-of-gravity position against the source-defined datum", "why_it_matters": "A passenger count cannot substitute for configuration-specific mass and balance limits." }, { "name": "Documented cabin capacity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Passenger seats and crew positions, counted separately and tied to a dated layout", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes advertised accommodation from an approved or actually installed arrangement." }, { "name": "Wooden-wing evidence state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unassessed; inspection documented; deterioration suspected; deterioration confirmed; repair awaiting acceptance", "why_it_matters": "Makes internal structural uncertainty visible instead of treating exterior appearance as proof of integrity." }, { "name": "Operating evidence envelope", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Speeds in km/h; range and altitude in km or m; associated mass, power, and atmospheric conditions", "why_it_matters": "Keeps performance claims tied to the configuration and conditions under which they were established." }, { "name": "Action eligibility", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unknown; conservation only; handling supported; ground operation supported; flight supported by applicable authority", "why_it_matters": "Separates historical capability from evidence permitting an action on a particular aircraft." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify an archival record or candidate airframe as F-10, F-10A, or unresolved using explicit evidence.", "Compare proposed specifications and flag values mixed across variants or modifications.", "Identify missing evidence for wooden-wing inspection and restoration planning.", "Assess whether a proposed cabin load can be evaluated against a documented loading envelope.", "Route proposed handling, ground operation, or flight to the applicable technical and authority records." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Describe the aircraft, its variants and history from reliable sources.", "Help museums and historians catalogue surviving examples and records." ], "must_not": [ "Present unverified accident causes as fact.", "Publish personal details about accident victims beyond public records.", "Remove parts from wreck or accident sites without legal authority." ], "requires_human": [ "Restoring, flying or selling a surviving historic airframe." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "A fatal crash of this type shaped aviation safety rules; it deserves accurate telling.", "Victims' families deserve respect in historical accounts." ], "affected_parties": [ "Families of accident victims", "Historians", "Museums" ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody now: the type is retired; museums and aviation authorities keep records of surviving aircraft.", "master_systems": [ "National civil aircraft registers" ] }, "what_it_is_for": [ "This aircraft family is encountered in histories of early passenger aviation, archival photographs and technical records from the late 1920s and early 1930s.", "Its principal role was carrying passengers on commercial air routes.", "Identification and assessment require distinguishing variants and separating documented original construction from later repairs or representations." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Air Commerce Act of 1926, enacted by the United States Congress, established the federal framework for aircraft certification and air commerce regulation during this family's operating period." ], "visual_identification": [ "Three propeller engines are arranged with one at the nose and one beneath each side of a high-mounted wing.", "A deep enclosed passenger fuselage beneath a broad wing distinguishes the general configuration from open-cockpit transports.", "Fixed landing gear and a tailwheel distinguish the silhouette from later retractable-gear airliners.", "Archival markings and documented airframe details are needed to distinguish this family from closely related high-wing trimotor transports." ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Deterioration of wooden wing structure or bonded joints can compromise structural integrity.", "Corrosion and fabric deterioration can weaken surviving airframes or conceal damage.", "Incorrect identification of a variant or undocumented modification can lead to unsuitable maintenance or restoration decisions.", "Treating historical specifications as proof of present airworthiness can endanger occupants and people nearby." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q868346: Fokker F-10", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q868346", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Fokker F-10", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_F-10", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "f-10-identity-and-variant", "name": "F-10 identity and variant", "description": "Establish which aircraft designation and configuration a record actually concerns.", "rationale": "F-10 family references, F-10A records, and generic trimotor descriptions must not collapse into one specification.", "layers": [ { "id": "designation-evidence", "name": "Designation evidence", "description": "Connect names and depictions to a supported F-10 identification.", "findings": [ { "id": "f-ten-label-is-evidence-not-proof", "name": "F-Ten marking supports identification", "description": "The Smithsonian describes an aircraft marked Fokker F-Ten; such a marking is an identification clue that requires corroboration. [Smithsonian photograph](https://www.si.edu/object/npm_A.2008-6)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which manufacturer, approval, or serial-linked record establishes that the subject is an F-10?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "f-ten-label-is-evidence-not-proof-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence depict a full-size aircraft, a scale model, or a later reconstruction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "f-ten-label-is-evidence-not-proof-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "variant-applicability", "name": "Variant applicability", "description": "Keep base-type and variant evidence distinguishable within the registry entry.", "findings": [ { "id": "f-10a-needs-explicit-qualification", "name": "F-10A requires explicit qualification", "description": "The Smithsonian identifies F-10A material separately; the precise technical relationship to the base F-10 remains a research requirement. [Smithsonian F-10A record](https://www.si.edu/es/object/model-static-fokker-f-10a-tri-motor-pan-american-world-airways%3Anasm_A19791464000)", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the source use F-10 for the base variant or as a family designation including F-10A?", "kind": "definition", "id": "f-10a-needs-explicit-qualification-q01" }, { "text": "Which documented changes distinguish F-10A dimensions, engines, and approved loading from those of the base F-10?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "f-10a-needs-explicit-qualification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "wooden-wing-and-airframe", "name": "Wooden wing and airframe", "description": "Represent the construction evidence and structural uncertainties central to assessing an F-10.", "rationale": "The type's wooden-wing history makes material condition and internal inspection evidence essential.", "layers": [ { "id": "construction-baseline", "name": "Construction baseline", "description": "Locate the structural elements and establish their documented construction.", "findings": [ { "id": "wooden-structure-requires-material-evidence", "name": "Wooden structure requires material evidence", "description": "ICAO attributes the 1931 F-10 loss to structural failure involving wood deterioration; exact construction and failure mechanisms require more detailed technical records. [ICAO historical account](https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/postalhistory/aviation_history_fokker_the_oldest_manufacterer.htm)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which drawings identify the F-10 wing's primary members, coverings, joints, and attachment interfaces?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "wooden-structure-requires-material-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which wood, adhesive, and protective-finish specifications apply to the particular variant or repair?", "kind": "definition", "id": "wooden-structure-requires-material-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "deterioration-and-repair-evidence", "name": "Deterioration and repair evidence", "description": "Determine what observations can support a structural assessment.", "findings": [ { "id": "internal-wing-condition-must-be-established", "name": "Internal wing condition must be established", "description": "The model should distinguish inspected internal structure from inaccessible or undocumented areas, with repair acceptance recorded separately from repair completion.", "questions": [ { "text": "What inspection evidence addresses moisture exposure, decay, joint separation, and prior repairs in the F-10 wing?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "internal-wing-condition-must-be-established-q01" }, { "text": "Which applicable procedure and qualified assessment establish whether a repaired wing may support the proposed action?", "kind": "action", "id": "internal-wing-condition-must-be-established-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "trimotor-operation-and-loading", "name": "Trimotor operation and loading", "description": "Connect the three-engine installation and cabin arrangement to documented operating limits.", "rationale": "An F-10 assessment requires configuration-specific propulsion and loading evidence rather than generic trimotor capability claims.", "layers": [ { "id": "propulsion-and-controls", "name": "Propulsion and controls", "description": "Identify installed engines, propellers, and the controls and supplies supporting them.", "findings": [ { "id": "three-engines-do-not-establish-capability", "name": "Three engines do not establish capability", "description": "The Smithsonian identifies the F-10A as a three-engine piston airliner; installed equipment and operating documentation must establish actual performance and control behaviour. [Smithsonian F-10A record](https://www.si.edu/es/object/model-static-fokker-f-10a-tri-motor-pan-american-world-airways%3Anasm_A19791464000)", "questions": [ { "text": "Which engine, propeller, fuel, and lubrication specifications apply at each installation position?", "kind": "definition", "id": "three-engines-do-not-establish-capability-q01" }, { "text": "What documentation establishes engine-control arrangements, fuel isolation, and any installed safeguards?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "three-engines-do-not-establish-capability-q02" }, { "text": "Under which documented conditions, if any, is continued flight with an engine inoperative supported?", "kind": "action", "id": "three-engines-do-not-establish-capability-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cabin-load-and-performance", "name": "Cabin load and performance", "description": "Assess passenger accommodation and performance against a single identified configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "capacity-needs-a-loading-context", "name": "Capacity needs a loading context", "description": "The model should require a dated cabin layout, mass statement, and operating conditions before accepting an F-10 capacity or range claim.", "questions": [ { "text": "What passenger, crew, baggage, and fuel arrangement accompanies the quoted capacity?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "capacity-needs-a-loading-context-q01" }, { "text": "Which source establishes permitted mass, centre-of-gravity limits, and performance for that F-10 configuration?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "capacity-needs-a-loading-context-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "approval-history-and-action", "name": "Approval history and action", "description": "Translate dated technical and regulatory evidence into bounded decisions about an F-10.", "rationale": "Historical operation and accident-related restrictions cannot independently establish what may be done with an aircraft today.", "layers": [ { "id": "historical-approval-applicability", "name": "Historical approval applicability", "description": "Associate approvals and restrictions with their issuing authority, date, and affected configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "approval-requires-dated-primary-records", "name": "Approval requires dated primary records", "description": "The draft does not establish an approval number or inspection mandate; those must be recovered from the relevant authority's records before being applied.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original type-approval documents identify the F-10 and F-10A, their issuing body, and approved configurations?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "approval-requires-dated-primary-records-q01" }, { "text": "Which original orders following the 1931 accident changed inspection or operating eligibility, and which aircraft did they cover?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "approval-requires-dated-primary-records-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "intervention-decision", "name": "Intervention decision", "description": "Match a proposed action to configuration, condition, and applicable authorisation evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "historical-design-is-not-action-authority", "name": "Action eligibility requires aircraft-specific evidence", "description": "An F-10 type identification should support evidence gathering, while handling, engine operation, and flight each require their own applicable support.", "questions": [ { "text": "For proposed movement, lifting, or disassembly, which F-10 instructions establish support points and structural prerequisites?", "kind": "action", "id": "historical-design-is-not-action-authority-q01" }, { "text": "For proposed engine operation or flight, which configuration records, inspections, operating documents, and authority decisions remain missing?", "kind": "action", "id": "historical-design-is-not-action-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the aircraft model family, not an individual surviving or registered airframe.", "Variant-specific dimensions, engine models, passenger capacities and military designations should be checked before adding numerical specifications.", "The 1931 crash that killed Knute Rockne involved an F-10A and is associated with wooden-wing structural failure; the precise investigation findings and subsequent regulatory actions require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "F-10", "F-10A" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Manufacturer model designation", "value_or_pattern": "F-10; F-10A", "note": "These designate aircraft models; individual airframes have separate construction numbers and registrations." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Scheduled passenger airline services in the United States.", "Military transport service using designated variants." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Number of piston engines", "typical_range": "3", "unit": "engines" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Deterioration of wooden wing members and adhesive joints can compromise structural integrity.", "Moisture intrusion and concealed damage can make wooden wing condition difficult to assess.", "Engine failure reduces available power and, for an outboard engine, creates asymmetric thrust." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Fokker F.VII", "difference": "The F.VII is the earlier aircraft family from which the larger American F-10 was developed." }, { "name": "Ford Trimotor", "difference": "A separate American three-engined transport family distinguished by its metal construction and corrugated metal exterior." }, { "name": "Fokker F-10A", "difference": "An improved variant within the F-10 family, rather than a separate unrelated aircraft type." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Fokker F-10 this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry's Fokker F-10 designation cover the F-10A within one type family, and does an existing Vercy world model already own that concept?", "What original manufacturer and approval documents establish variant-specific dimensions, engine ratings, seating, loading limits, and performance?", "What do original investigation records establish about the 1931 wing failure, beyond later summaries referring to wood deterioration?", "What were the exact issuing authorities, dates, applicability boundaries, and requirements of historical F-10 approval and inspection orders?", "Which original aircraft, components, or reconstructions survive, and what documentation supports their identity, structural condition, and permissible use?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 15, "questions": 24 } }