{ "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-12T09:28:38Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094f1-a6cf-7b00-a9ca-ca3ef2c6f588\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: emphasis\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 043: 1001 regist", "usd": 0.0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 59.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a094f1-a6dd-75f0-9d39-e4c6937722c8\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: emphasis\nRegistry id: vr.tr.emphasis\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } }, "enrichment": { "pass": 3, "engine": "claude", "producedAt": "2026-10-06T12:00:00Z", "ingestedAt": "2026-10-06T08:39:46+00:00", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "ethics", "failure_modes_and_hazards", "owners" ] }, "revisions": [ { "at": "2026-10-07T11:41:50+00:00", "engine": "codex", "fields": [ "agent_conduct", "definition", "distinguishing_features", "ethics", "in_scope", "out_of_scope", "purpose", "scope_statement" ], "answering_review": "217d73fc2ca505b3d25b1351fe9c792dd2377c5ae70d05135cd4db69cc886677" } ], "gate": { "passed": true, "version": "1.0", "at": "2026-10-07T12:16:35+00:00", "evidence": [ "completeness 1.00", "sense: Wikidata description", "2 live sources", "review by codex: pass" ] } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q920915", "registryId": "vr.tr.emphasis", "name": "emphasis", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q920915/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.emphasis", "name": "emphasis", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify and apply typographic emphasis, distinguish intended from perceived prominence, and judge whether the font styling suits the context and audience.", "definition": "Emphasis is the strengthening of selected words in a text by using a font style, such as italics or bold, that differs from the surrounding text to signal importance, contrast or expressive force.", "scope_statement": "This model owns emphasis achieved by styling selected words differently from surrounding text, including the relationship between the styled words, their context and readers' interpretation.", "in_scope": [ "The emphasised words are considered in relation to the surrounding text and its baseline font style.", "Differences in font style or weight, such as italics or bold, provide typographic emphasis.", "Intended emphasis, visible font differences and readers' interpretations may differ.", "The degree, distribution, appropriateness and revision of font-based emphasis are within scope." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Spoken stress, musical emphasis, gesture and substantive prioritisation are outside this typographic sense.", "General theories of attention, perception and memory are outside scope.", "Typography and visual composition are outside scope except where a different font style strengthens selected words.", "Intrinsic importance, truth, urgency or value independent of typographic prominence is outside scope.", "Complete grammatical models of information structure and focus are outside scope." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Typographic emphasis relates selected words to the baseline font style of their surrounding text.", "An observable font difference does not alone establish an intention to emphasise.", "A font change used only to identify a heading or another text category does not necessarily constitute emphasis.", "Emphasised words receive prominence through a different font style or weight.", "Typographic prominence is separate from endorsement or truth, so an objection, quotation or false claim can receive emphasis." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Emphasis sense", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "communicative prominence | declared importance | enacted priority | mixed | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a highlighted message from being treated as evidence of actual commitment." }, { "name": "Emphasised target", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "word, phrase, proposition, visual element, theme, concern, activity, or objective", "why_it_matters": "Makes explicit what is foregrounded and at what granularity." }, { "name": "Comparison context", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "surrounding elements, competing concerns, prior version, expected delivery, or explicit baseline", "why_it_matters": "Supports judgements of relative prominence." }, { "name": "Emphasis mechanism", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "prosody | formatting | placement | repetition | elaboration | gesture | explicit declaration | preferential treatment | combination", "why_it_matters": "Connects a prominence judgement to inspectable evidence." }, { "name": "Cue contrast", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "cue-specific difference from a stated baseline, such as duration ratio, font-size ratio, repetition count, or space share", "why_it_matters": "Allows comparison without assuming that all mechanisms share one intensity scale." }, { "name": "Intention evidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "explicitly stated | inferred | disputed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Keeps authorial or organisational intent separate from an observer's interpretation." }, { "name": "Audience uptake", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "study-specific prominence rating, selection frequency, or qualitative response, with audience and procedure recorded", "why_it_matters": "Tests whether the intended target is actually perceived as prominent." }, { "name": "Cue alignment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "reinforcing | conflicting | audience-dependent | unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Exposes cases where different mechanisms foreground different targets." } ], "affordances": [ "Annotate the target, extent, mechanism, and baseline of an emphasis instance.", "Compare emphasis across versions, channels, or audiences using explicit criteria.", "Adjust wording, delivery, formatting, placement, or repetition to foreground a chosen target.", "Detect competing cues or widespread highlighting that obscures the intended hierarchy.", "Test intended emphasis against audience interpretation and revise accordingly.", "Distinguish statements of importance from evidence that a concern receives preferential treatment." ], "agent_conduct": { "may": [ "Explain how different font styles create emphasis within text.", "Apply emphasis in text it writes so that the important part is clear to readers." ], "must_not": [ "Use emphasis to make a minor point look major or hide an important condition.", "Strip or shift emphasis when quoting so that the speaker's meaning changes.", "Rely on colour or styling alone for emphasis that people with visual impairments cannot perceive." ], "requires_human": [ "A human must decide how to emphasise warnings or terms in legal or safety notices." ] }, "ethics": { "considerations": [ "Emphasis steers attention, so it can inform honestly or manipulate.", "Fine print and buried terms are a known way to mislead consumers." ], "affected_parties": [ "Readers are affected by typographic emphasis.", "Consumers are affected by emphasis in commercial text.", "People with visual impairments are affected by the accessibility of emphasis." ] }, "owners": { "steward": "Nobody owns it; the author answers for emphasis in a given work.", "master_systems": [] }, "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Misplaced emphasis in instructions can cause people to miss a warning.", "Quoting with altered emphasis can misrepresent what someone said." ], "what_it_is_for": [ "Typographic emphasis appears in printed and digital text to draw attention to selected words or passages.", "It helps readers identify importance, contrast or stress within otherwise continuous text." ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.2, issued by the World Wide Web Consortium, apply to web content and require information conveyed through presentation to be programmatically determinable or available in text." ], "visual_identification": [ "Selected words use a different font style, such as italics, from the surrounding text.", "A locally heavier font weight makes words stand out within the same passage.", "The styling affects a limited span within running text, although appearance alone cannot establish its intended meaning." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikidata", "title": "Wikidata item Q920915: emphasis", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q920915", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "identity and sense of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api" }, { "id": "wikipedia-en", "title": "Wikipedia: Emphasis (typography)", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emphasis_%28typography%29", "url_status": "live", "what_it_supports": "general description of the item", "checked_by": "wikidata-api sitelink" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "sense-and-boundaries", "name": "Sense and boundaries", "description": "Establish which meaning of emphasis applies and how it differs from neighbouring concepts.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish communicative prominence from substantive priority and avoid treating either as intrinsic importance.", "layers": [ { "id": "operative-meaning", "name": "Operative meaning", "description": "Capture the definition used by the relevant speaker, practitioner, or analytical framework.", "findings": [ { "id": "emphasis-definition", "name": "Emphasis definition", "description": "Record the adopted sense and attribute it rather than assuming a single definition across domains.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does emphasis here mean perceptual prominence, rhetorical stress, declared importance, enacted priority, or a combination?", "kind": "definition", "id": "emphasis-definition-q01" }, { "text": "Whose terminology or analytical framework supports this interpretation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "emphasis-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-concepts", "name": "Neighbouring concepts", "description": "Separate emphasis from ordinary stress, mention, salience, and importance.", "findings": [ { "id": "emphasis-boundary-test", "name": "Emphasis boundary test", "description": "Record the evidence that warrants an emphasis label and the alternative explanations still available.", "questions": [ { "text": "What makes this additional prominence rather than ordinary pronunciation, routine formatting, or simple mention?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "emphasis-boundary-test-q01" }, { "text": "Could the same evidence reflect accidental salience, grammatical focus, or importance without deliberate highlighting?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "emphasis-boundary-test-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "target-and-contrast", "name": "Target and contrast", "description": "Identify what receives emphasis and the context that makes its prominence interpretable.", "rationale": "Emphasis judgements become ambiguous when the target, extent, or comparison set is unspecified.", "layers": [ { "id": "target-extent", "name": "Target extent", "description": "Locate the marked element and the meaning or concern it is understood to foreground.", "findings": [ { "id": "marked-and-interpreted-target", "name": "Marked and interpreted target", "description": "Distinguish the physical or textual location of a cue from the proposition, theme, or objective it emphasises.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which exact words, region, gesture, theme, or activity carry the emphasis?", "kind": "definition", "id": "marked-and-interpreted-target-q01" }, { "text": "Does the cue foreground only that element, a larger proposition, or an implied contrast?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "marked-and-interpreted-target-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "contrast-baseline", "name": "Contrast baseline", "description": "Specify what the target stands out against.", "findings": [ { "id": "relative-prominence", "name": "Relative prominence", "description": "Anchor emphasis to surrounding material, competing concerns, or an expected presentation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Against which surrounding elements, alternatives, or ordinary presentation is the target emphasised?", "kind": "definition", "id": "relative-prominence-q01" }, { "text": "What observable difference remains when the target is compared with that baseline?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "relative-prominence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "mechanisms-and-distribution", "name": "Mechanisms and distribution", "description": "Describe the means that produce emphasis and how prominence is distributed across targets.", "rationale": "An agent needs inspectable cues to recognise emphasis and controllable parameters to change it.", "layers": [ { "id": "cue-realisation", "name": "Cue realisation", "description": "Record mechanisms appropriate to the medium or practice.", "findings": [ { "id": "observable-emphasis-cues", "name": "Observable emphasis cues", "description": "Capture cue-specific evidence while keeping communicative signals separate from preferential treatment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which changes in delivery, formatting, placement, repetition, elaboration, gesture, or treatment signal emphasis?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "observable-emphasis-cues-q01" }, { "text": "For a claimed priority, what evidence shows preferential treatment beyond an emphatic declaration?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observable-emphasis-cues-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "prominence-pattern", "name": "Prominence pattern", "description": "Assess the strength, spread, and coordination of emphasis cues.", "findings": [ { "id": "emphasis-hierarchy", "name": "Emphasis hierarchy", "description": "Record whether targets have a discernible prominence ordering and whether cues support the same ordering.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which targets receive the strongest cues, and by what medium-specific comparison?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "emphasis-hierarchy-q01" }, { "text": "Do the cues reinforce a discernible hierarchy, compete for prominence, or mark nearly everything alike?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "emphasis-hierarchy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretation-and-adjustment", "name": "Interpretation and adjustment", "description": "Evaluate intended and perceived emphasis and support purposeful revisions.", "rationale": "A visible or audible cue does not by itself establish audience interpretation or suitability for the intended task.", "layers": [ { "id": "intent-and-uptake", "name": "Intent and uptake", "description": "Separate intended foregrounding from what particular audiences perceive.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-perceived-alignment", "name": "Intended and perceived alignment", "description": "Record evidence for intention and uptake independently, including divergent audience interpretations.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence identifies the intended target and communicative purpose of the emphasis?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-perceived-alignment-q01" }, { "text": "Which target does the relevant audience perceive as prominent, and how was that assessed?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "intended-perceived-alignment-q02" }, { "text": "Does the audience interpret the emphasis as contrast, correction, insistence, importance, irony, or something else?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intended-perceived-alignment-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "revision-and-transfer", "name": "Revision and transfer", "description": "Guide changes and preserve intended prominence across presentations.", "findings": [ { "id": "purposeful-emphasis-revision", "name": "Purposeful emphasis revision", "description": "Specify a revision and a context-appropriate way to check whether it improves the intended foregrounding.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which cue should be added, reduced, moved, or replaced to make the intended target clearer?", "kind": "action", "id": "purposeful-emphasis-revision-q01" }, { "text": "When translating, reformatting, or changing modality, how can the intended prominence remain available to the audience?", "kind": "action", "id": "purposeful-emphasis-revision-q02" }, { "text": "What comparison would show that the revision improves target recognition without introducing an unintended interpretation?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "purposeful-emphasis-revision-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded; this description assumes the broad communicative and compositional concept.", "Linguistics, rhetoric, and visual design use related but nonidentical accounts of emphasis; no single operational definition covers them all.", "Standards are recalled without consultation; acoustic quantities are possible indicators of spoken prominence, not universal measures of emphasis." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Prosodic emphasis in speech", "Typographic emphasis in writing", "Syntactic emphasis through sentence structure", "Rhetorical emphasis through repetition or arrangement", "Visual emphasis in composition" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "WHATWG HTML Living Standard: the em element represents stress emphasis, while strong represents importance, seriousness, or urgency.", "W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2: information conveyed through presentation must be accessible, and color must not be its sole visual means of communication." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Speakers highlight contrasts or corrections through intonation, duration, and intensity.", "Writers and editors use italics and other typographic distinctions to guide interpretation.", "Rhetoric uses repetition, placement, and parallel structure to foreground claims.", "Graphic designers create focal points through contrast, scale, spacing, and placement.", "Interfaces highlight important information and actions through visual hierarchy." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Fundamental frequency associated with spoken prominence", "typical_range": "No universal range; assessed relative to the speaker and surrounding speech", "unit": "Hz" }, { "quantity": "Duration of an emphasized speech segment", "typical_range": "No universal range; compared with an appropriate unstressed or less prominent baseline", "unit": "ms" }, { "quantity": "Relative acoustic intensity", "typical_range": "No universal range; depends on speaker, context, and recording conditions", "unit": "dB" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Emphasizing too many elements weakens the distinctions that guide attention.", "Misplaced emphasis can change the implied contrast or intended interpretation.", "Visual emphasis conveyed only through color can be inaccessible.", "Presentational styling without corresponding semantics can lose meaning in assistive technologies.", "Readers or listeners may mistake prominence for evidence or substantive importance." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Languages differ in how prosody, word order, and grammatical constructions express emphasis.", "Typographic emphasis conventions vary across writing systems and editorial traditions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Salience", "difference": "Salience is perceptual or cognitive noticeability; emphasis concerns prominence given to an element, which may or may not successfully attract attention." }, { "name": "Importance", "difference": "Importance concerns significance or consequence; an element can be emphasized without being substantively important." }, { "name": "Linguistic focus", "difference": "Focus structures information and relevant alternatives; emphasis can express affect or prominence without marking focus." }, { "name": "Lexical stress", "difference": "Lexical stress is part of a word's pronunciation pattern; emphasis is context-dependent and can modify prominence beyond that pattern." }, { "name": "Contrast", "difference": "Contrast is a difference or opposition between elements; emphasis may use contrast to make one element prominent." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of emphasis this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend emphasis to cover both communicative prominence and substantive priority, or a narrower quality?", "Which disciplinary definitions distinguish emphasis from focus, stress, salience, and importance, and where do their boundaries disagree?", "Under which definitions is intention required, and when can unintended but perceived prominence count as emphasis?", "Which measures of perceived emphasis are defensible across media, languages, and audiences without assuming a universal intensity scale?", "What evidence is sufficient to distinguish an organisation's declared emphasis from enacted priority?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }