# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T13:53:07Z", "synthesisSha256": "8ba86ddcdda0ff7462859825c910665372109fbcff2003f4752ee048e62c9889", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-ACT-001", "registryId": "vr.wm-act-001", "name": "Function / Capability", "version": "1.0.0-reviewable-draft", "previousVersions": [ { "version": "0.2.0-legacy", "url": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/blob/feat/mega-model-registry/models/activity-work/K1-function-and-capability.md" } ], "entryKind": "aggregate", "family": "World Models", "category": "Activities and processes", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "ACT.CAP" ], "tags": [ "function", "capability", "act.cap" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-act-001-function-capability/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-act-001", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-act-001", "model_id": "WM-ACT-001", "name": "Function / Capability", "entry_kind": "aggregate", "purpose": "Describe a function and the context-qualified capability claims about bearers that may realize it, with evidence, capacity and explicit limits.", "scope_statement": "One governed function/capability dossier, identified independently of its revisions, contains one function description and separately identified capability specifications, bearer attributions and capacity statements relevant to that function. Function is the intended behavior or result; capability is the ability claimed to realize it. A dossier can exist without a bearer claim. The aggregate is a local proposed boundary, not an external standard class.", "in_scope": [ "Stable dossier identity and versioned function input, output, intended effect and limitation descriptions.", "Capability realization alternatives, bearer-specific claims, evidence links, conditional proficiency and capacity declarations.", "Local status, comparison records, disclosure projections and revision traceability for these records." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Skill and competency scheme definitions, canonical proficiency scales and their mapping governance belong to WM-PER-009 and scheme authorities.", "Person, organization, asset and software master data; assessment execution, credential issuance and revocation systems.", "Actual acts, workflow execution, scheduling, reservations, task assignment, permission enforcement, hiring decisions and service delivery.", "Domain-specific operating instructions for hazardous or controlled activities; this model records only policy constraints and qualified authority references." ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-PER-009 Skill / Competency Definition", "distinction": "Reference pinned skill concepts and scale definitions when a human competency profile applies. Do not recreate the legacy skill taxonomy or infer bearer proficiency from an occupation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-ACT-002 Act; WM-ACT-003 Process / Workflow; WM-ACT-009 Method / Procedure", "distinction": "Function is a behavior description, capability is conditional potential, and an act is an occurrence. Link method and performance records without executing or owning them.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-ACT-034 Assessment / Evaluation", "distinction": "Assessment outcomes can support a claim; local acceptance records do not conduct an assessment or certify competence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-PER-001 Person; WM-ORG-001 Organization; adopting asset or software master", "distinction": "Bearer identity and configuration are external. Collective capability is not inherited from every member, and membership alone supplies no realization evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-ACT-008 Plan / Schedule; WM-ACT-004 Service Definition", "distinction": "Conditional capacity declarations are neither reservations nor promises to deliver a service. Available time and contractual commitments remain externally mastered.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "neighbor": "Credential, authority and access systems", "distinction": "Issuer, bearer, local custodian and relying party are distinct roles. A capability claim or accessible endpoint grants no permission to act. Local withdrawal does not revoke an external credential.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "ESCO skills pillar", "organization": "European Commission", "url": "https://esco.ec.europa.eu/en/about-esco/escopedia/escopedia/skills-pillar", "version_or_date": "Undated explanatory page accessed 2026-10-06; dataset release not imported", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Skill and knowledge concepts, scheme identifiers and occupational links support definition references, not proof that a particular bearer is capable." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "O*NET Content Model", "organization": "U.S. Department of Labor", "url": "https://www.onetcenter.org/content.html", "version_or_date": "Live content-model overview accessed 2026-10-06; no database release imported", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Distinguishes worker abilities, skills, work activities, context and licensing. Occupational descriptors cannot establish individual competence." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Semantic Sensor Network Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-vocab-ssn-20171019/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2017-10-19, section 5.1 systems module", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Conditional system capabilities and operating properties ground the machine profile. Generalizing this conditional pattern to other bearers is a local design proposal." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2009-08-18, sections 4, 8 and 10", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Concept schemes and qualified mapping relations inform external definition binding; similarity is not instance identity or operational substitutability." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2013-04-30, sections 3 and 4", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Entity, activity, agent, derivation and revision relations inform evidence provenance. Attribution of a record to its author differs from a capability attributed to a bearer." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/REC-vc-data-model-2.0-20250515/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2025-05-15, sections 2, 4.8, 4.10, 5.1 and 8.9", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Issuer, subject, validity and status separate claim authenticity from claim truth; privacy guidance informs disclosure policy. No credential verification implementation is provided." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Web of Things Thing Description 1.1", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/REC-wot-thing-description11-20231205/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2023-12-05, sections 5.3.1.4, 5.3.1.6 and security vocabulary", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Action affordances distinguish interface descriptions, inputs, outputs and behavior hints from execution and security. The model uses conceptual alignment only." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", "organization": "Internet Engineering Task Force", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339", "version_or_date": "July 2002, section 5.6; update applicability remains a profile review item", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T13:51:43Z", "relevance": "Timestamp grammar supports seconds and explicit time offsets. Interval boundaries, recurring calendars and unknown dates require additional local policy." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "act-cap-definition-bundle", "name": "Definition and binding", "description": "Keep the function description separate from the capabilities and schemes that can realize it.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates definition and binding from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-identity-layer", "name": "Dossier identity", "description": "A stable dossier has one function scope and separately identified subordinate records.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-identity-finding", "name": "Dossier identity", "description": "Proposed local context: A stable dossier has one function scope and separately identified subordinate records.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-identity-q01", "kind": "identity", "text": "Which authoritative identifier and revision identify this dossier and its function description?", "answer_data": [ "master namespace", "dossier ID", "function ID", "revision ID" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-identity-q02", "kind": "definition", "text": "What intended behavior or result makes this a function description rather than an occurrence?", "answer_data": [ "purpose", "boundary", "expected outcome", "excluded act IDs" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-identity-q03", "kind": "classification", "text": "Which bearer classes and domain profile does this function scope permit?", "answer_data": [ "person/organization/system class", "profile reference", "scope exclusions" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-identity-q04", "kind": "lifecycle", "text": "When does a changed function meaning require a successor dossier instead of a compatible revision?", "answer_data": [ "identity policy", "breaking change criteria", "successor link" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-identity-data-dossier-key", "name": "Dossier key", "description": "Authoritative master identifier; never synthesized from name, level and date.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-identity-data-function-contract", "name": "Function description", "description": "Own function ID and revision, purpose, expected inputs, outputs and domain scope.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-identity-artifact", "name": "Function scope record", "description": "Versioned local representation of dossier identity. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-binding-layer", "name": "Capability and skill binding", "description": "Link capability specifications to the function; skill and scale masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-binding-finding", "name": "Capability and skill binding", "description": "Proposed local context: Link capability specifications to the function; skill and scale masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-binding-q01", "kind": "relationship", "text": "Which capability specification is claimed to realize this function, and is the link necessary, sufficient or only proposed?", "answer_data": [ "capability ID and revision", "realization role", "conditions", "review status" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-binding-q02", "kind": "interoperability", "text": "Which scheme concept, version and language are referenced for an applicable human skill?", "answer_data": [ "WM-PER-009 binding", "scheme URI", "release", "concept URI", "language" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-binding-q03", "kind": "quality", "text": "What information is lost when a broader, narrower or close external concept is used?", "answer_data": [ "mapping reference", "relation type", "loss notes", "use restrictions" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-binding-q04", "kind": "exception", "text": "How is a capability represented when no suitable external skill concept exists?", "answer_data": [ "local capability specification", "scope note", "unmapped status", "review request" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-binding-data-capability-link", "name": "Capability realization link", "description": "Separately identified capability specification and qualified function relation; this can remain a proposal without any bearer attribution.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-binding-data-skill-binding", "name": "Skill definition binding", "description": "Versioned external concept and mapping references; local labels are display aliases only.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-binding-artifact", "name": "Definition binding record", "description": "Versioned local representation of capability and skill binding. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-claims-bundle", "name": "Bearer claims", "description": "State who claims which bearer can realize the function without merging the bearer and issuer.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates bearer claims from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-attribution-layer", "name": "Claim attribution", "description": "Each attribution has its own identity, author, bearer, capability revision and evidential state.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-attribution-finding", "name": "Claim attribution", "description": "Proposed local context: Each attribution has its own identity, author, bearer, capability revision and evidential state.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-attribution-q01", "kind": "identity", "text": "Which claim identifier links exactly which bearer to which capability revision?", "answer_data": [ "claim ID", "bearer master reference", "capability revision", "claim scope" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-attribution-q02", "kind": "provenance", "text": "Is this claim self-declared, assessed, inferred or imported, and who made it?", "answer_data": [ "claim basis", "asserting party", "source record", "derivation method" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-attribution-q03", "kind": "ownership", "text": "Who stewards the local claim and who controls correction of its external evidence?", "answer_data": [ "custodian role", "bearer rights channel", "issuer authority", "correction route" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-attribution-q04", "kind": "evidence", "text": "What supports, contradicts or leaves this capability attribution unknown?", "answer_data": [ "evidence references", "contrary evidence", "acceptance status", "unknown reason" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-attribution-data-attribution", "name": "Attribution record", "description": "Independent claim ID, bearer reference, capability reference, asserting role, evidence status and scope; separate competing claims are retained.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-attribution-artifact", "name": "Capability attribution record", "description": "Versioned local representation of claim attribution. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-qualification-layer", "name": "Proficiency and acceptance", "description": "Scale-based competence and quantitative system performance are different kinds of claim.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-qualification-finding", "name": "Proficiency and acceptance", "description": "Proposed local context: Scale-based competence and quantitative system performance are different kinds of claim.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-qualification-q01", "kind": "measurement", "text": "Which applicable proficiency scale and descriptor qualify the claim, or why is a scale inapplicable?", "answer_data": [ "external scale reference", "version", "level", "descriptor", "not-applicable reason" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-qualification-q02", "kind": "constraint", "text": "Under which task conditions and assessment scope can this qualification be relied on?", "answer_data": [ "task scope", "assessment reference", "conditions", "limitations" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-qualification-q03", "kind": "validation", "text": "What acceptance rule distinguishes claimed, supported, disputed and unknown ability?", "answer_data": [ "profile rule revision", "evidence sufficiency", "acceptance status", "reviewer role" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-qualification-q04", "kind": "exception", "text": "How is a claim handled when scales disagree or have no validated conversion?", "answer_data": [ "original values", "incomparability reason", "mapping evidence", "review route" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-qualification-data-qualification", "name": "Qualification statement", "description": "Scale binding or explicit inapplicability, level or descriptor, method reference, limitations and acceptance status. No mandatory universal numeric score.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-qualification-artifact", "name": "Qualification basis record", "description": "Versioned local representation of proficiency and acceptance. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-conditions-bundle", "name": "Operating conditions and capacity", "description": "Represent where and when a claim applies without scheduling or authorizing work.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates operating conditions and capacity from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-envelope-layer", "name": "Operating envelope", "description": "Conditions, resources and configuration bound realization claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-envelope-finding", "name": "Operating envelope", "description": "Proposed local context: Conditions, resources and configuration bound realization claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-envelope-q01", "kind": "requirement", "text": "Which resources, configuration and preconditions are necessary for the claimed capability?", "answer_data": [ "resource master references", "configuration revision", "preconditions", "unknown prerequisites" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-envelope-q02", "kind": "spatial", "text": "Which location or environmental conditions bound the capability statement?", "answer_data": [ "location reference", "environment range", "units", "condition profile" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-envelope-q03", "kind": "measurement", "text": "What observable criterion and uncertainty establish whether the operating envelope holds?", "answer_data": [ "observable", "method reference", "tolerance", "uncertainty", "observation time" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-envelope-q04", "kind": "security", "text": "Which separate authorization and hazard policy checks are required before anyone may exercise the capability?", "answer_data": [ "policy references", "qualified authority", "prohibited contexts", "external authorization status" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-envelope-data-envelope", "name": "Condition envelope", "description": "Capability and bearer/configuration scope, required resources, environment ranges, observation basis and restriction references.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-envelope-artifact", "name": "Operating envelope record", "description": "Versioned local representation of operating envelope. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-capacity-layer", "name": "Capacity and availability", "description": "A declared rate or window is evidence-qualified and never silently becomes a booking.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-capacity-finding", "name": "Capacity and availability", "description": "Proposed local context: A declared rate or window is evidence-qualified and never silently becomes a booking.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-capacity-q01", "kind": "measurement", "text": "What quantity per period or concurrent volume is declared, with which units and quality conditions?", "answer_data": [ "quantity", "unit", "denominator interval", "concurrency limit", "quality threshold" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-capacity-q02", "kind": "temporal", "text": "For which effective window and observation time is this capacity declaration applicable?", "answer_data": [ "effective start/end", "boundary convention", "observation time", "calendar reference" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-capacity-q03", "kind": "quality", "text": "Is the capacity measured, estimated, theoretical or committed elsewhere, and what supports that status?", "answer_data": [ "capacity kind", "evidence reference", "uncertainty", "external commitment reference" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-capacity-q04", "kind": "constraint", "text": "Which shared resource or existing commitment prevents capacity statements from being added together?", "answer_data": [ "resource pool reference", "overlap constraints", "external allocation snapshot", "unknown availability" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-capacity-data-capacity", "name": "Capacity statement", "description": "Independently identified quantity/rate, units, quality conditions, capacity kind, effective window and shared-resource limitations.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-capacity-artifact", "name": "Capacity declaration", "description": "Versioned local representation of capacity and availability. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-realization-bundle", "name": "Realization and effects", "description": "Describe realization alternatives and potential consequences without executing a plan.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates realization and effects from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-layer", "name": "Composition and alternatives", "description": "Requirements combine through explicit all-of or any-of relations, not an implicit sum of abilities.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-finding", "name": "Composition and alternatives", "description": "Proposed local context: Requirements combine through explicit all-of or any-of relations, not an implicit sum of abilities.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-q01", "kind": "composition", "text": "Which capabilities or resources are jointly required and which are alternatives for this function?", "answer_data": [ "dependency IDs", "all-of/any-of expression", "configuration scope", "evidence references" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-q02", "kind": "relationship", "text": "What evidence supports a collective bearer claim beyond the abilities of its members?", "answer_data": [ "collective bearer reference", "integration evidence", "member role references", "scope" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-q03", "kind": "validation", "text": "How are dependency cycles, unresolved references and incompatible alternatives reported?", "answer_data": [ "graph check result", "unresolved IDs", "cycle witness", "compatibility reasons" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-q04", "kind": "process", "text": "Which method or workflow reference describes realization while retaining its own execution ownership?", "answer_data": [ "method reference", "workflow version", "responsible external master", "binding status" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-data-dependency", "name": "Realization dependency", "description": "Qualified all-of/any-of requirements with stable endpoint references; aggregation and collective sufficiency are proposed and require domain evidence.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-dependencies-artifact", "name": "Realization dependency map", "description": "Versioned local representation of composition and alternatives. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-effects-layer", "name": "Behavior and effect limits", "description": "Input/output descriptions and affordance hints do not prove successful execution or reversibility.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-effects-finding", "name": "Behavior and effect limits", "description": "Proposed local context: Input/output descriptions and affordance hints do not prove successful execution or reversibility.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-effects-q01", "kind": "definition", "text": "What inputs and outputs describe the function at the required granularity?", "answer_data": [ "input schema reference", "output schema reference", "units", "error shape" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-effects-q02", "kind": "state", "text": "Which expected effect or state transition is described and which remains an untested claim?", "answer_data": [ "pre-state", "expected post-state", "effect basis", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-effects-q03", "kind": "constraint", "text": "Which effects are reversible, compensable, irreversible or unknown under the stated profile?", "answer_data": [ "effect classification", "compensation reference", "limits", "authority requirements" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-effects-q04", "kind": "exception", "text": "Which failure modes and missing prerequisites must be disclosed with the affordance?", "answer_data": [ "failure categories", "exception conditions", "hazard policy reference", "unknown behavior" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-effects-data-behavior", "name": "Behavior description", "description": "Function-level inputs, outputs, preconditions, effects and failure categories; endpoint bindings are references only. Interface safe/idempotent hints are not physical safety certification.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-effects-artifact", "name": "Function effect contract", "description": "Versioned local representation of behavior and effect limits. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-assurance-bundle", "name": "Evidence and validity", "description": "Preserve evidence origin, contradictory observations and time-qualified acceptance.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates evidence and validity from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-evidence-layer", "name": "Evidence provenance", "description": "Link evidence to the exact claim; source attribution is not a claim of truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-evidence-finding", "name": "Evidence provenance", "description": "Proposed local context: Link evidence to the exact claim; source attribution is not a claim of truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-evidence-q01", "kind": "evidence", "text": "Which assessment, credential or observed act supports this specific claim and scope?", "answer_data": [ "evidence master ID", "claim ID", "scope correspondence", "evidence type" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-evidence-q02", "kind": "provenance", "text": "How was each evidence item obtained and transformed before use here?", "answer_data": [ "issuer", "source locator", "derivation chain", "digest", "retrieval time" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-evidence-q03", "kind": "validation", "text": "What was checked for authenticity, status and substantive relevance, and what was not checked?", "answer_data": [ "verification report reference", "check time", "verifier role", "unchecked aspects" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-evidence-q04", "kind": "quality", "text": "Which contrary observations or sampling limitations prevent generalizing the evidence?", "answer_data": [ "contrary act references", "sample conditions", "selection limitations", "review disposition" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-evidence-data-evidence", "name": "Evidence link", "description": "Evidence master identity, claim binding, provenance, integrity and separately recorded authenticity, status and relevance checks.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-evidence-artifact", "name": "Claim evidence index", "description": "Versioned local representation of evidence provenance. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-validity-layer", "name": "Claim lifecycle and time", "description": "Revision, withdrawal, expiry and knowledge about ability must not collapse into one state.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-validity-finding", "name": "Claim lifecycle and time", "description": "Proposed local context: Revision, withdrawal, expiry and knowledge about ability must not collapse into one state.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-validity-q01", "kind": "temporal", "text": "What effective interval, issue time and recording time belong to the claim revision?", "answer_data": [ "valid from/until", "issue time", "recorded time", "offset", "unknown boundary" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-validity-q02", "kind": "lifecycle", "text": "Which role and evidence authorize suspension, correction, supersession or withdrawal of this local claim?", "answer_data": [ "transition", "reason", "authorizing role", "evidence", "prior revision" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-validity-q03", "kind": "state", "text": "How does credential expiry or unavailable status affect reliance without asserting that actual ability disappeared?", "answer_data": [ "credential status", "status freshness", "reliance decision", "ability unknown state" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-validity-q04", "kind": "event", "text": "Which observed change triggers reassessment without automatically fabricating a new result?", "answer_data": [ "configuration change reference", "new contrary evidence", "reassessment request", "pending state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-validity-data-validity", "name": "Claim revision status", "description": "Per-claim history with effective/recorded times, transition authority and separate credential status, reliance state and ability claim.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-validity-artifact", "name": "Claim revision ledger", "description": "Versioned local representation of claim lifecycle and time. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-reliance-bundle", "name": "Reliance and stewardship", "description": "Create bounded comparisons and disclosure views under role-specific authority.", "rationale": "This proposed grouping separates reliance and stewardship from neighboring concerns and externally mastered processes.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "act-cap-matching-layer", "name": "Requirement comparison", "description": "Comparison is a reviewable local record; absent evidence is not proof of inability.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-matching-finding", "name": "Requirement comparison", "description": "Proposed local context: Comparison is a reviewable local record; absent evidence is not proof of inability.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-matching-q01", "kind": "requirement", "text": "Which external requirement and version is compared against the capability claim?", "answer_data": [ "requirement reference", "task/service owner", "criteria", "required context" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-matching-q02", "kind": "decision", "text": "Which criteria are met, unmet, unknown or incomparable, and on what evidence?", "answer_data": [ "criterion-level results", "claim revisions", "rule revision", "explanation" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-matching-q03", "kind": "interoperability", "text": "What approved mapping and unit or scale conversion permits this particular comparison?", "answer_data": [ "mapping master reference", "conversion basis", "loss report", "unmapped fields" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-matching-q04", "kind": "authority", "text": "Who reviews a comparison before a consequential assignment or decision in the external system?", "answer_data": [ "review role", "decision authority reference", "appeal route", "no-assignment marker" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-matching-data-comparison", "name": "Comparison record", "description": "External requirement binding, per-criterion evidence and four-state result. Not a universal ranking, assignment or decision engine.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-matching-artifact", "name": "Capability comparison report", "description": "Versioned local representation of requirement comparison. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-layer", "name": "Disclosure and disposition", "description": "Protected bearer claims and evidence need purpose-limited views and record-specific retention.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-finding", "name": "Disclosure and disposition", "description": "Proposed local context: Protected bearer claims and evidence need purpose-limited views and record-specific retention.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-q01", "kind": "access", "text": "Which recipient and purpose may access the function, claim and supporting artifact separately?", "answer_data": [ "recipient role", "purpose", "scope grants", "expiry", "redacted fields" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-q02", "kind": "privacy", "text": "Which minimal view answers the request without exposing unnecessary bearer or assessor data?", "answer_data": [ "projection fields", "pseudonymous reference", "disclosure basis", "correlation risk" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-q03", "kind": "retention", "text": "Which retention rule and hold determine when local claim payloads and evidence links may be disposed of?", "answer_data": [ "record category", "policy reference", "hold status", "disposition authority", "tombstone scope" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-q04", "kind": "ownership", "text": "How can a bearer dispute an attribution while preserving the issuer record and a traceable correction outcome?", "answer_data": [ "dispute reference", "issuer correction route", "local restriction", "resolution reference" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-data-disclosure", "name": "Disclosure and retention binding", "description": "Recipient/purpose policy bindings, redaction rules, retention schedule and dispute route for the dossier; external evidence remains under its own master.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "act-cap-disclosure-artifact", "name": "Disclosure and retention profile", "description": "Versioned local representation of disclosure and disposition. Record explicit unknowns and external master references; this is a candidate artifact, not an implemented schema.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable review projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system ID first; otherwise governed IRI, then assigned UUID/ULID. Artifact ID is separate from dossier, revision, source locator and content digest; time is metadata.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "act-cap-fn-register", "name": "Register dossier revision", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Create the local function/capability description with subordinate IDs and explicit gaps.", "inputs": [ "function scope", "capability links", "master identities", "policy revision" ], "outputs": [ "draft revision or refusal reasons" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized dossier steward", "No conflicting identifier; required scope fields supplied" ], "effects": [ "Creates only a local draft; does not attribute a capability to a bearer" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-fn-attribute", "name": "Record capability attribution", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record a sourced assertion with issuer and bearer separated.", "inputs": [ "claim source", "bearer reference", "capability revision", "evidence state" ], "outputs": [ "claim revision or refusal reasons" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized claim writer", "Claim basis explicit; external references resolve or are marked unresolved" ], "effects": [ "Adds local claim without certifying ability or issuing a credential" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-fn-link-evidence", "name": "Link and qualify evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach evidence references and existing verification outcomes to a scoped claim.", "inputs": [ "claim revision", "evidence reference", "check report", "contrary material" ], "outputs": [ "qualified evidence link or refusal reasons" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized evidence role", "Claim revision current; evidence access allowed" ], "effects": [ "Records provenance and check limitations; does not run an assessment or infer truth from a signature" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-fn-declare-capacity", "name": "Record capacity declaration", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Store a conditional rate or availability statement with measurement basis.", "inputs": [ "claim revision", "capacity quantity and units", "effective window", "conditions and shared resources" ], "outputs": [ "capacity revision or refusal reasons" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized capacity declarer", "Denominator, quality conditions and evidence kind explicit; current revision matches" ], "effects": [ "Changes local capacity declaration; does not allocate resources or accept work" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-fn-compare", "name": "Prepare bounded comparison", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record a criterion-level comparison for review using authorized pinned evidence.", "inputs": [ "requirement reference", "claim revisions", "approved mapping/rules", "use context" ], "outputs": [ "met/unmet/unknown/incomparable results with explanations, or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized purpose and read scope", "Pinned rule set exists; missing or incompatible inputs produce unknown or incomparable" ], "effects": [ "Creates reviewable report only; does not rank people or make an external assignment" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "act-cap-fn-revise", "name": "Record local claim transition", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Apply a permitted revision or local withdrawal without changing the external issuer record.", "inputs": [ "claim ID and expected revision", "requested transition", "reason and authority evidence" ], "outputs": [ "new local revision or concurrency/authority refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized transition role", "Expected revision matches; retention and holds evaluated" ], "effects": [ "Supersedes local reliance state with traceable history; never revokes external credentials or erases other masters" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-PER-009", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Skill and competency concept, scale and mapping definitions remain with their scheme master; optional human profile binding.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "WM-PER-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Bearer identity for person attributions; no copied person lifecycle or protected-trait inference.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Organization bearer and issuer references with independent collective-capability evidence.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Observed act evidence; own execution, event identity and effects remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-003", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Workflow realization description only; no process orchestration.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-009", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Applicable method and prerequisites only; no procedure execution.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-034", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Assessment result and method evidence, without owning assessment lifecycle.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-008", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: External calendar and commitment evidence; declarations are not reservations.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "WM-ACT-004", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Service definition requiring or realizing the function; no service commitment inferred.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-vocab-ssn-20171019/", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Conditional system capability pattern for applicable machine profiles only; no universal equivalence.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2023/REC-wot-thing-description11-20231205/", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Action affordance concept and effect hints where an interface binding exists; no execution permission.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/REC-vc-data-model-2.0-20250515/", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Proposed binding: Optional credential evidence carrier; proof/status validation is external and does not prove capability.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Identify the accountable dossier steward, bearer reference authorities and claim issuers by role and master IDs.", "Declare adopting domain, namespace, profile version, access basis and applicable retention policy.", "Pin definition, scale, evidence and external model bindings before operational use; expose unresolved bindings." ], "namespace_guidance": "Use governed dossier, function, capability and claim namespaces with distinct IDs. Source URLs, labels, dates and content hashes are not interchangeable with identity.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-act-001", "WM-PER-009", "WM-ACT-002", "WM-ACT-034" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve one function scope per dossier, separate function/capability/claim/evidence IDs and explicit unknowns.", "Normalize units only with recorded conversion and original values; retain scheme version and language." ], "patch_rules": [ "Require writer authority and expected revision; create a new revision with reason and source evidence.", "Breaking changes in function meaning require successor identity and migration review; do not rewrite issuer evidence." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "A concept mapping does not establish interchangeable bearers or comparable levels.", "Old comparisons retain pinned inputs; updated claims require fresh evaluation under the external decision process." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "Assigned UUID or ULID in the adopting Dimension" ], "timestamp_rule": "Use RFC 3339 timestamps with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Separate effective/event time, issue time and observation/ingestion time. Preserve unknown times; interval and recurring-calendar semantics require a profile.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use stable dossier and artifact IDs plus separate revision IDs. Serial artifacts include evidence links, claims and capacity declarations. Dates may appear in display labels but never serve as identity.", "integrity_rule": "Record content digest, algorithm, provenance and authorized revision link. A matching digest verifies bytes only, not competence, currency or authority." }, "policies": [ "All semantic structures and operations here are proposed local design; sources anchor distinctions and alignment, not compliance certification.", "Ability, authority, availability, obligation and willingness are separate; do not derive one from another.", "Do not infer individual ability from occupational averages, protected traits, group membership or a credential alone.", "Use human review under the adopting policy for consequential decisions and contested evidence; preserve explanation and correction routes.", "Hazardous domains remain at policy and restriction level. No operational instructions or automatic permission are provided." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve dossier and source revisions under recipient/purpose scope. Redact protected bearer and assessor details; indicate withheld or stale evidence without treating it as absence." ], "create": [ "Require authorized steward, stable ID, function scope and governing profile. Bearer attributions remain absent until an actual claim and source are recorded." ], "update": [ "Use compare-and-swap revision checks, retain contrary evidence and append correction provenance. Recompute no external state." ], "delete": [ "Retire or supersede local records under the adopting retention/disposition policy. Apply active holds, authorized payload deletion and minimal lawful tombstones; do not retain personal payloads indefinitely for history.", "The adopting storage/disposition service executes deletion. Referenced credential, person, organization, assessment and act masters retain their own lifecycle; local deletion cannot revoke or erase them." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Dossier steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own the local function boundary, revision policy and reference bindings." ] }, { "name": "Claim issuer", "responsibilities": [ "Assert or correct only claims within evidenced authority; distinguish self-declaration from assessment." ] }, { "name": "Bearer or representative", "responsibilities": [ "Provide authorized statements, request restricted views and dispute errors without silently rewriting issuer evidence." ] }, { "name": "Evidence reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Record scope, provenance, limitations and contradictory evidence; separate authenticity from substantive reliance." ] }, { "name": "Relying reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Use authorized views, document comparison purpose and route consequential decisions to their owner." ] }, { "name": "Access and retention administrator", "responsibilities": [ "Enforce scoped access and authorized disposition through external services." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny bearer-level claims and evidence access unless a role and purpose grant applies. Public function descriptions require an explicit publication decision; a public descriptor does not expose evidence.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Record authorized exception basis, approving role, scope, expiry and audit reference; exceptions do not override external issuer control." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Log reading of protected evidence and all claim, mapping, status and disclosure changes in the adopting audit system.", "Keep decision inputs and reason references sufficient for review subject to lawful minimization and retention." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Adopting Dimension owner and access policies", "AGENTS.md", "Pinned specification and publication holds", "Bound external definitions and authorized evidence" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed aggregate for one function/capability dossier with separately identified definitions, bearer claims and conditional capacity. Local no-tools self-audit completed. Skill schemes and external executions remain reference-owned. Reviewable draft only; source verification, domain profiles, executable conformance and independent review remain open.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Dossier, function, capability, claim and artifact IDs are distinct; revisions and dates are not identity." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Draft, corrected, disputed, suspended, withdrawn and superseded local records; external credential transitions are delegated." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Function realization, bearer claims, collective dependencies and external definitions use qualified references." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Effective, issue and recorded times remain distinct; recurring calendars are externally bound." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidence identity, derivation and verification limitations attach to exact claim revisions." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Steward, issuer, bearer, assessor and relying roles have different authority; no universal ownership claim." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema passes are distinct from executable instance schemas, mapping tests and domain assessments, which remain to be implemented." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Recipient/purpose restrictions and minimal projections apply down to artifacts." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local payload disposition and minimal lawful history follow external retention execution; issuer records are not erased here." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual ESCO, O*NET, SKOS, SSN, PROV-O, credential and WoT alignments require version-pinned bindings and fixtures." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Function purpose, input/output shape, effect claims, conditions and capacity are direct abstract-record properties." }, { "dimension": "physical properties", "status": "not-applicable", "notes": "The dossier itself has no mass, size or material. Bearer and environmental measurements are referenced with units, method, conditions, time and uncertainty." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Definition, attribution, evidence and actual performance are distinguishable; observed acts do not prove unrestricted potential." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and possible actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Realization alternatives, preconditions, effects, reversibility, failure modes and policy hazards are described without execution." }, { "dimension": "independent review", "status": "gap", "notes": "Claude and Grok skipped under the owner waiver; separate local Codex audit is not external review." }, { "dimension": "source verification", "status": "gap", "notes": "Eight official documents were accessible through the web tool with selected sections reviewed; direct HTTP status and current applicability were not measured." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Nested instance schemas, concrete adapter bindings, executable comparison rules and domain acceptance fixtures.", "Empirical models of skill decay, calibrated proficiency conversion, team sufficiency and shared-resource capacity aggregation.", "Qualified review of employment, licensing, privacy, accessibility, safety and sector-specific reliance policy in each adopting jurisdiction.", "Verification of current source versions, licensing and complete domain applicability; restoration of independent review." ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "ESCO and O*NET are illustrative European and United States occupational resources; neither supplies universal function definitions or bearer certifications.", "SSN and WoT apply to system/interface profiles. Applying their distinctions to human and organizational claims is a local abstraction, not normative equivalence." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "A valid credential about a bearer can support an authentic claim whose substantive competence remains unknown.", "Expiry changes evidential reliance, not a proven fact that the bearer lost ability.", "Two claims with the same bearer, capability, level and day can remain distinct issuer assertions.", "A high occupational requirement score cannot be copied as a personal proficiency score.", "Two nominal capacities sharing a resource cannot be summed without an external allocation model.", "An accessible action affordance, idempotence hint or capability record grants no permission and proves no physical safety.", "A hidden or absent assessment yields unknown rather than incapable; incompatible scales yield incomparable.", "Withdrawal of a public profile does not revoke issuer evidence; retention history does not authorize perpetual personal data storage." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "aggregate", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "A single dossier identifies one function scope while preserving separately identified capability specifications, bearer attributions, capacity statements and evidence links. Function, ability and occurrence are explicitly distinct. The root may have no bearer claims; person, organization, skill-scheme and execution masters remain external. The registry standalone-mm value is a registry-plane label." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Aggregate boundary", "disposition": "accepted as proposed", "rationale": "One function scope per dossier and independent subordinate identities prevent the root from silently becoming an untyped mixture of function, bearer and event. Cross-function capability reuse remains reference-based." }, { "concept": "Legacy skill-definition overlap", "disposition": "delegated", "rationale": "The registered K1 split and WM-PER-009 purpose are reconciled by external skill, scale and mapping references. Wildcard taxonomy imports and inherited conformance assertions are rejected." }, { "concept": "Stable claim identity", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Independent claim IDs avoid collapsing different issuers or revised levels on the same day. Dates, labels, hashes and source locators remain metadata rather than authoritative identity." }, { "concept": "Bearer, issuer and steward authority", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Profile control does not authorize changing issuer evidence. Dispute and correction routes coexist with local disclosure restrictions and separately mastered credential status." }, { "concept": "Proficiency and occupational descriptions", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "A human scale is optional and profile-specific. Occupational descriptors cannot establish a person's ability; machine performance is not forced into a human proficiency score." }, { "concept": "Operating envelope and capacity", "disposition": "accepted with limits", "rationale": "Units, conditions, time and evidential kind qualify declarations. Shared-resource limits prevent unsupported addition. Declarations confer neither a reservation nor authority to perform work." }, { "concept": "Collective realization and dependencies", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "All-of and any-of dependencies are explicit proposed descriptions. Collective sufficiency requires its own evidence; a group's ability is not deduced from membership or individual skills alone." }, { "concept": "Effects and affordances", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Expected effects and interface hints remain descriptions. They are not observations, permissions, guaranteed success, physical safety certification or proof of reversibility." }, { "concept": "Evidence provenance and truth", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Evidence authorship, authenticity, current issuer status and relevance are distinct. A verified credential or digest does not certify the substantive capability claim." }, { "concept": "Expiry and claim transitions", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Local reliance state, credential status and actual ability are distinct. Expiry or inaccessible evidence can make reliance unknown without proving that ability ceased to exist." }, { "concept": "Requirement comparison", "disposition": "accepted as local record", "rationale": "Met, unmet, unknown and incomparable outcomes retain explicit grounds and pinned inputs. The comparison operation does not make consequential external decisions or authorize assignments." }, { "concept": "Disclosure and retention", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "Recipient and purpose scopes constrain views. Authorized payload disposition and minimal lawful history avoid perpetual personal-data retention; external masters retain their own lifecycles." }, { "concept": "Instance validation and proposed operations", "disposition": "deferred for runtime", "rationale": "Candidate fields and six local operation contracts are useful research structure, but nested schemas, adapters, rule engines and conformance fixtures are not implemented or certified." }, { "concept": "Source verification and independence", "disposition": "limited and held", "rationale": "Selected official browser readings support the design anchors. No direct HTTP measurements or external provider results exist. The no-tools phase is a local self-audit and cannot satisfy independent review." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner override and single-provider waiver. This local Codex no-tools self-audit is not an independent second-provider review.", "Source and version verification is incomplete. Eight official documents were accessed through the web tool and selected sections reviewed. Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox block; no HTTP status was measured. Coordinator check_sources.py is prepared, but transport success alone will not close substantive, current-version or licensing review.", "Adopting profiles require qualified review of human and organizational competence, team sufficiency, machine operating conditions, shared-resource capacity, employment, privacy, licensing, accessibility and domain safety. No universal proficiency conversion, decay rule, authority or legal-compliance claim is supplied.", "Nested instance schemas, version-pinned neighbor bindings, comparison rules, adapters and executable conformance fixtures remain incomplete. All six local operations are proposed and unimplemented; no assessment, capacity allocation, credential verification or external execution is certified.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Complete outside-sandbox transport checks and source version, licensing and substantive applicability review without treating HTTP 200 as a substantive verification result.", "Build domain profiles and adversarial fixtures for bearer-free dossiers, contested issuer claims, stale evidence, incomparable scales, shared-resource capacity and collective ability.", "Implement and validate nested schemas and pinned mappings, including separate provenance authorship and capability-bearer relations.", "Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 8, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 48, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }