Extraction Operation
Describe and inspect one bounded natural-resource extraction campaign through authority evidence, observed work, outputs, conditions and residual duties.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
7 bundles · 14 layers · 14 findings · 56 questions
Identity and boundary Operation-specific context for identity and boundary.
Campaign identity
One bounded extraction campaign or operating episode has its own identity. A mine, well, vessel, permit or reporting period cannot alone distinguish repeated operations.
Campaign identity
One bounded extraction campaign or operating episode has its own identity. A mine, well, vessel, permit or reporting period cannot alone distinguish repeated operations.
- Which master identifier distinguishes this campaign from other episodes at the same asset? identity
- Which extraction profile and resource class describe the episode? classification
- What rule fixes the campaign boundary and separates extraction from exploration or processing? definition
- Who maintains this record and who actually operated during each responsibility interval? ownership
Resource and footprint
Link the resource and place masters; retain the operation-specific footprint or track and its evidence. Planned areas, actual disturbance and resource estimates are distinct.
Resource and footprint
Link the resource and place masters; retain the operation-specific footprint or track and its evidence. Planned areas, actual disturbance and resource estimates are distinct.
- Which site, well, harvest compartment or fishing area did the episode use? spatial
- Which independently maintained stock or deposit assessment is relevant without being treated as extracted output? relationship
- How does the observed footprint differ from the approved or planned area? measurement
- How are uncertain positions and crossings between management areas represented? exception
Authority and operating limits Operation-specific context for authority and operating limits.
Applicable authority evidence
Record the claimed legal or customary basis, competent authority and applicable conditions by reference. Evidence may describe unauthorized or disputed extraction without authorizing it.
Applicable authority evidence
Record the claimed legal or customary basis, competent authority and applicable conditions by reference. Evidence may describe unauthorized or disputed extraction without authorizing it.
- Which instruments or customary tenure evidence are claimed to permit this extraction? authority
- Which authority revision and validity interval applied when extraction occurred? temporal
- Which community, tenure or access claims remain unresolved for the affected area? constraint
- What evidence records an absent, suspended or contested authority basis? exception
Limit and accounting basis
A cap is optional and profile-specific: quantity, area, effort or other conditions may apply. Store local operands and external rule references; shared allocation and legal compliance decisions remain external.
Limit and accounting basis
A cap is optional and profile-specific: quantity, area, effort or other conditions may apply. Store local operands and external rule references; shared allocation and legal compliance decisions remain external.
- Which limits apply to this campaign and which are explicitly not applicable? requirement
- What resource, unit, period and allocation basis make output comparable to each limit? measurement
- Which other campaigns share the same allowance and authoritative accounting ledger? composition
- What prevents provisional, duplicate or late output records from being treated as final utilization? validation
Plan and observed execution Operation-specific context for plan and observed execution.
Plan and capability references
Pin the approved plan and selected method category at policy level. Equipment capability, worker competency and readiness reviews are external evidence, not permission inferred from possession of equipment.
Plan and capability references
Pin the approved plan and selected method category at policy level. Equipment capability, worker competency and readiness reviews are external evidence, not permission inferred from possession of equipment.
- Which approved plan revision and method category were intended for this episode? process
- Which assets, teams and competency records are associated with the plan? relationship
- Which prerequisites and stop conditions are required by the applicable safety and environmental profile? constraint
- Who approved a material change of plan and what evidence records its scope? decision
Execution intervals and exceptions
Record proposed, underway, interrupted, ceased and cancelled states as local profile terms with supporting evidence. Cancellation before work, interruption and completed extraction have different meanings.
Execution intervals and exceptions
Record proposed, underway, interrupted, ceased and cancelled states as local profile terms with supporting evidence. Cancellation before work, interruption and completed extraction have different meanings.
- Which evidenced state describes the campaign and which transitions are still disputed? lifecycle
- When did work start, pause, resume and cease relative to the planned interval? temporal
- Which observed interruption or deviation changed the execution record? event
- What external decision supports resumption after a stop condition? authority
Outputs and measurement Operation-specific context for outputs and measurement.
Measured and estimated removals
Preserve observation provenance and the resource-specific measurement basis. Estimates, corrected observations and actual measurements remain distinguishable; a report is not automatically verified.
Measured and estimated removals
Preserve observation provenance and the resource-specific measurement basis. Estimates, corrected observations and actual measurements remain distinguishable; a report is not automatically verified.
- What quantity or effort was observed and on which unit and reference basis? measurement
- Which method, conditions, uncertainty and calibration or sampling evidence qualify the value? quality
- Who produced the observation and which source revision supports it? provenance
- How are estimates, missing observations, zero output and corrections distinguished? exception
Output attribution and handoff
Connect output categories to separately mastered lots, landings and downstream records. Removal, retained product, discards, losses and sales are not interchangeable totals; sector profiles define categories.
Output attribution and handoff
Connect output categories to separately mastered lots, landings and downstream records. Removal, retained product, discards, losses and sales are not interchangeable totals; sector profiles define categories.
- Which outputs are retained product, incidental catch, discards, waste or loss under this profile? classification
- Which lot or stream allocations connect this episode to commingled or split outputs? composition
- Which receipt or transfer evidence links extraction to landing, custody or downstream processing? relationship
- Which discrepancies or overlapping categories prevent a reconciled output total? validation
Conditions and adverse outcomes Operation-specific context for conditions and adverse outcomes.
Environmental and community condition evidence
Bind condition references to evidence of effects on the affected area or community. Baseline and impact assertions need dates and evaluation context; no causal or sustainable-use conclusion follows from a single reading.
Environmental and community condition evidence
Bind condition references to evidence of effects on the affected area or community. Baseline and impact assertions need dates and evaluation context; no causal or sustainable-use conclusion follows from a single reading.
- Which environmental and community obligations apply to the campaign footprint? requirement
- Which baseline and monitoring observations support the reported condition status? evidence
- Which exceedance, complaint or unexpected effect remains unresolved? exception
- What limitations prevent the available observations from proving compliance or causation? quality
Safety and incident linkage
Keep hazards, controls, stop-work evidence and incident links at policy level. Incident investigation, emergency response and equipment control remain owned by qualified external systems.
Safety and incident linkage
Keep hazards, controls, stop-work evidence and incident links at policy level. Incident investigation, emergency response and equipment control remain owned by qualified external systems.
- Which hazard review and control-verification records cover the current plan revision? security
- Which role can stop work and which authority evaluates readiness to resume? authority
- Which incident or near-miss records are linked to this campaign? event
- Which worker or reporter details require restricted handling while preserving necessary safety evidence? privacy
Cessation and residual duties Operation-specific context for cessation and residual duties.
Restoration and financial assurance references
Where applicable, link restoration, rehabilitation, monitoring or decommissioning obligations and supporting assurance instruments. These are not universal or necessarily owed only after cessation.
Restoration and financial assurance references
Where applicable, link restoration, rehabilitation, monitoring or decommissioning obligations and supporting assurance instruments. These are not universal or necessarily owed only after cessation.
- Which restoration or aftercare obligations are triggered and which have an explicit non-applicability basis? requirement
- What milestones and monitoring periods survive the end of extraction? temporal
- Who remains responsible after an operator change or abandonment? ownership
- Which financial assurance reference covers the applicable duty and what coverage is uncertain? relationship
Closure evidence and acceptance
Cessation, completion of remedial work, acceptance of a duty and release of assurance are separate assertions. The local record links decisions without issuing them or extinguishing liability.
Closure evidence and acceptance
Cessation, completion of remedial work, acceptance of a duty and release of assurance are separate assertions. The local record links decisions without issuing them or extinguishing liability.
- Which extraction work has ceased and which residual duties remain open? state
- What work and observation records support a claimed restoration outcome? evidence
- Which competent reviewer accepted a specific duty and what qualifications remain? decision
- What evidence distinguishes partial acceptance, later failure and reopening from final release? exception
Reporting and record assurance Operation-specific context for reporting and record assurance.
Reporting and disclosure evidence
Keep the reporting obligation, submitted revision, acknowledgement and acceptance distinct. Recipient-specific disclosure is governed; neither all data nor all regulator views have a universal exclusion list.
Reporting and disclosure evidence
Keep the reporting obligation, submitted revision, acknowledgement and acceptance distinct. Recipient-specific disclosure is governed; neither all data nor all regulator views have a universal exclusion list.
- Which returns are required for which recipient, period and applicable reporting profile? requirement
- Which revision was prepared, submitted, acknowledged or rejected? state
- What purpose and authority govern the fields visible to each recipient? access
- Which mapping preserves local units, categories and identifiers in a required reporting format? interoperability
Lineage, correction and disposal
Maintain source-linked assertions with explicit uncertainty, controlled correction and retention dependencies. These record-governance choices are proposed locally; provenance vocabulary does not mandate retention durations.
Lineage, correction and disposal
Maintain source-linked assertions with explicit uncertainty, controlled correction and retention dependencies. These record-governance choices are proposed locally; provenance vocabulary does not mandate retention durations.
- Which source, actor and derivation chain support each material assertion? provenance
- How are conflicting observations and superseded assertions preserved without double counting? validation
- Which retention rule or hold controls disposal of this campaign record and its sensitive payloads? retention
- What identifiers and loss annotations allow a recipient to trace an exported assertion back to its source? interoperability
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- World Models
- Category
- Activities and processes
- Entry kind
- entity
- Navigation path
- NAV.ACT.EXT
- Domain
- ACT.EXT
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- extractionoperationact.ext
- Also called
- K10
What it is Filled
A persistent campaign record for mining, drilling, logging or fishing, including planned, incomplete, disputed and unauthorized episodes. The model represents evidence and local status; it neither controls physical extraction nor certifies legality or sustainability.
In scope
- Campaign identity, classification, boundary, footprint and actor references
- Applicable authority, plan, limit and condition bindings
- Execution intervals, output observations and downstream linkage
- Safety and environmental evidence links, reporting, cessation and residual-duty acceptance references
Out of scope
- Master rights, licences, resource or reserve estimation, site and equipment lifecycle
- Issuing permissions, operating machinery, emergency response, enforcement or legal determinations
- Aquaculture and cultivation cycles, downstream processing, sales or royalty accounting
- Executing restoration, releasing financial assurance or publishing private records
Why it exists Filled
Describe and inspect one bounded natural-resource extraction campaign through authority evidence, observed work, outputs, conditions and residual duties.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- Unlike WM-ACT-002: Candidate reconciliation of legacy K2 EXTEND: a campaign can contain several acts and is not necessarily one atomic act. Pin act references; do not inherit an unverified schema.
- Unlike WM-ACT-010: Downstream production runs master processing and transformation; only output handoff references live here.
- Unlike WM-EAR-004: Mineral deposits and assessments are resource-owned; legacy P5 is not a site model. Only applicable mining or drilling resource references live here.
- Unlike WM-BLT-008: Candidate managed site reference where applicable; mobile fishing operations may instead reference geographic areas. Site lifecycle is external.
- Unlike WM-POL-014: Candidate legal rights and entitlement reference; physical extraction authority is separate from permission to read data.
- Unlike WM-XCT-001: Candidate stewardship binding for the record, distinct from title to land or natural resources; no generic ownership machinery duplicated.
- Unlike WM-XCT-002: Candidate data-access policy binding only. A legacy S2 data permission is not an extraction licence.
- Unlike https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/: Conceptual activity, entity, agent and derivation mapping only; executable mappings and conformance fixtures are deferred.
- Unlike Legacy K10 and unreviewed supplement: Reconcile as non-authoritative inputs. Reject universal commons tenure, mandatory quota or restoration, permit-plus-site identity, prevention of recording unauthorized activity and wildcard conformance. Campaign is a persistent entity, not necessarily one atomic act.
Note: Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Deleting a local record never cancels a permit, incident, liability or restoration duty
- Deny by default; grant least-privilege access by campaign, purpose and recipient, with separate sensitive evidence controls.
May
- Register campaign evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Create a local evidence record for an asserted campaign, including incomplete or unauthorized cases.
- Bind external authority and plan: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Pin applicable authority, plan and limit revisions without altering their masters.
- Record output observation: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Append a measured, estimated or corrected observation with sector-specific units and evidence.
- Prepare output reconciliation: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Prepare a local arithmetic comparison from pinned compatible observations and allocation evidence.
- Link condition or incident evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate an external assessment, stop notice, complaint or incident with the affected interval.
- Record cessation and acceptance evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach cessation, remedial work and acceptance decisions as separately qualified assertions.
- Prepare controlled return: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Construct a local reporting projection with traceable source revisions and loss annotations.
Note: Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.
Moral aspects Derived, awaiting review
- Legal applicability, community rights, trade sensitivity and worker privacy require qualified profile review
- Authorized records system executes disposal; preserve only lawful minimal tombstones and dependency links, not perpetual personal data
Note: Sentences mentioning harm, privacy, consent or similar, collected from the specification.
Owners Filled
Steward
Owner designated by the adopting Dimension; no fixed commercial owner
Roles
- Record steward
- Maintain identity, boundary and revisions
- Evidence recorder
- Attribute observations and disclose gaps
- Qualified profile reviewer
- Review sector, jurisdiction, safety and measurement applicability
- Authority liaison
- Link external decisions without issuing them locally
- Disclosure and records custodian
- Apply access, retention and lawful disposition rules
Links to other meta-models Filled
aligned
- WM-ACT-002 - Candidate reconciliation of legacy K2 EXTEND: a campaign can contain several acts and is not necessarily one atomic act. Pin act references; do not inherit an unverified schema.
- https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ - Conceptual activity, entity, agent and derivation mapping only; executable mappings and conformance fixtures are deferred.
references
- WM-ACT-010 - Downstream production runs master processing and transformation; only output handoff references live here.
- WM-EAR-004 - Mineral deposits and assessments are resource-owned; legacy P5 is not a site model. Only applicable mining or drilling resource references live here.
- WM-BLT-008 - Candidate managed site reference where applicable; mobile fishing operations may instead reference geographic areas. Site lifecycle is external.
- WM-POL-014 - Candidate legal rights and entitlement reference; physical extraction authority is separate from permission to read data.
- WM-XCT-001 - Candidate stewardship binding for the record, distinct from title to land or natural resources; no generic ownership machinery duplicated.
- WM-XCT-002 - Candidate data-access policy binding only. A legacy S2 data permission is not an extraction licence.
neighbor
- WM-ACT-002 - Candidate reconciliation of legacy K2 EXTEND: a campaign can contain several acts and is not necessarily one atomic act. Pin act references; do not inherit an unverified schema.
- WM-ACT-010 - Downstream production runs master processing and transformation; only output handoff references live here.
- WM-EAR-004 - Mineral deposits and assessments are resource-owned; legacy P5 is not a site model. Only applicable mining or drilling resource references live here.
- WM-BLT-008 - Candidate managed site reference where applicable; mobile fishing operations may instead reference geographic areas. Site lifecycle is external.
- WM-POL-014 - Candidate legal rights and entitlement reference; physical extraction authority is separate from permission to read data.
- WM-XCT-001 - Candidate stewardship binding for the record, distinct from title to land or natural resources; no generic ownership machinery duplicated.
- WM-XCT-002 - Candidate data-access policy binding only. A legacy S2 data permission is not an extraction licence.
- https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ - Conceptual activity, entity, agent and derivation mapping only; executable mappings and conformance fixtures are deferred.
- Legacy K10 and unreviewed supplement - Reconcile as non-authoritative inputs. Reject universal commons tenure, mandatory quota or restoration, permit-plus-site identity, prevention of recording unauthorized activity and wildcard conformance. Campaign is a persistent entity, not necessarily one atomic act.
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Authoritative master-system identifier with namespace
- Governed global identifier or IRI
- UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension
Direct properties not applicable Not applicable
Not applicable
Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.
Recognition optional Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- Register campaign evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Create a local evidence record for an asserted campaign, including incomplete or unauthorized cases.
- Bind external authority and plan: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Pin applicable authority, plan and limit revisions without altering their masters.
- Record output observation: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Append a measured, estimated or corrected observation with sector-specific units and evidence.
- Prepare output reconciliation: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Prepare a local arithmetic comparison from pinned compatible observations and allocation evidence.
- Link condition or incident evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate an external assessment, stop notice, complaint or incident with the affected interval.
- Record cessation and acceptance evidence: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach cessation, remedial work and acceptance decisions as separately qualified assertions.
- Prepare controlled return: Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Construct a local reporting projection with traceable source revisions and loss annotations.
Hazards and failure modes optional Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Derived, awaiting review
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
Context of use required Filled
- FAO materials inform a voluntary international pattern; fisheries and forest rules require local profiles.
- Mining guidance covers selected US public-land and Nevada examples; offshore guidance is US-specific. No worldwide legal applicability is inferred.
- Safety kit summaries and catalogue pages are not full normative implementations.
Sources Filled
- Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Forest management planning - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Mining and Minerals - Bonding - Bureau of Land Management
- Nevada - Mining and Minerals - Bureau of Land Management
- Production Information - Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
- Safety and Environmental Management Systems - SEMS - Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
- On-line resource kit: mining - International Labour Organization
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium
Open questions
- Verify admitted source versions and applicability; resolve deferred UNFC and CRIRSCO leads before adding any alignment or conformance claim.
- Develop qualified sector profiles and executable fixtures for repeated campaigns, unauthorized evidence, shared limits, uncertain measurements, commingled outputs, operator changes, partial restoration acceptance and lawful disposal.
- Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion.
- Executable nested schemas, acceptance fixtures and unit/category mappings are not implemented.
- Detailed onshore drilling, artisanal and subsistence practices, indigenous rights processes, protected species and resource-specific controls require specialist profiles.
- UNFC full text retrieval failed; CRIRSCO was not reviewed. Neither wildcard legacy import is admitted as a conformance claim.
- No independent external provider review; source currency and direct HTTP status remain unverified.
- Global resource or reserve estimates, ecosystem regeneration models, royalty accounting, commodity custody, enforcement, incident response and financial assurance execution are delegated.
Machine files
Provenance
world-models research · reviewable-draft
Built from: models/wm-act-012-extraction-operation/spec.yaml