# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-07T07:54:01Z", "synthesisSha256": "3858b36460ca8a52d97d85aef737e9ea50d0845d87a12486621b8267a2399114", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-CIV-002", "registryId": "vr.wm-civ-002", "name": "Religion Institution", "version": "0.1.0-reviewable-draft", "previousVersions": [ { "version": "0.2.0-legacy", "url": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/blob/feat/mega-model-registry/models/civilization/D6-religion-and-belief-institutions.md" } ], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "SOC.CIV.REL" ], "tags": [ "religion", "institution", "soc.civ.rel" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-civ-002-religion-institution/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-civ-002", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-civ-002", "model_id": "WM-CIV-002", "name": "Religion Institution", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Describe one enduring religious or belief institution through qualified identity, community authority, practice references and protected stewardship.", "scope_statement": "One self-described organized religious or belief community, congregation, order or institution with persistent identity, whether or not legally registered. The root holds institution-specific assertions and references; it is not a universal tradition taxonomy, a person register, a legal entity master or an observance event.", "in_scope": [ "Institution identity, self-description, legal-status references and evidenced continuity", "Internal governance and religious role assertions, restricted participation links and institutional safeguards", "Attributed tradition and text references, practice and calendar links, site use, resource stewardship and authorized projections" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Determining theological truth, ranking beliefs or inferring personal religion", "Person, legal organization, property, financial account, event and heritage-object master records", "Executing religious rites, appointments, admissions, expulsions, legal registrations, payments or safeguarding investigations", "Universal doctrine taxonomy, calendar computation, legal compliance certification and mandatory public directory inclusion" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-ORG-001 Organization", "distinction": "Reference an administrative or legal body where it exists. The institution can persist without registration or through changes of legal vehicle; do not duplicate organization master governance or execution.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-PER-001 Person", "distinction": "People retain external identity. Affiliation and role links are purpose-limited restricted assertions; attendance, family, dress, donations and names must never be used to infer belief.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-BLT-001 Building / Structure and external site master", "distinction": "Use and sacred designation are qualified links, not property title, geometry, building condition or access authorization. A physical place is optional.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-CIV-005 Social Norm", "distinction": "Cross-reference customs with attributed institutional practice. Religious and secular meanings can overlap; neither model owns all customs.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "neighbor": "Tradition concept, text edition and observance event", "distinction": "Concepts, works, editions, calendar definitions and occurrences have separate identities. A denomination may be an institution, a concept or both via distinct linked records.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Guidelines on the Legal Personality of Religious or Belief Communities", "organization": "OSCE ODIHR and Venice Commission", "url": "https://www.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/9/9/139046.pdf", "version_or_date": "2014", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Parts I-III distinguish community existence, self-definition, organization and legal personality. Human-rights guidance, not a universal registration implementation." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Managing faith charities as trustees", "organization": "Charity Commission for England and Wales", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/faith-based-charities/managing-faith-charities-as-trustees", "version_or_date": "Updated 2021-07-28", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "England and Wales example of governing instruments, distinct trustee and religious roles, resources and safeguarding. No global charity-status or threshold rule is adopted." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "The Organization Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2014-01-16", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Organization, formal organization, role, membership, site and change-event concepts inform optional mappings. They neither establish legal authority nor require a formal entity." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2009-08-18", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Concepts, labels, schemes and mappings support qualified tradition references; taxonomy placement is not organizational identity or theological truth." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Attribution, derivation and activity support traceable assertions. Provenance alone does not establish correctness, consent or authority." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "General Data Protection Regulation - historical EU text", "organization": "European Union", "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2016/679/pdfs/eur_20160679_2016-05-04_en.pdf", "version_or_date": "2016-05-04 historical EU text hosted by UK legislation service", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Articles 5, 6, 9 and 17 inform purpose, lawful basis, sensitive belief data and qualified erasure. Historical EU text, not the current UK amended regime or a verified current EU consolidation." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", "organization": "Internet Engineering Task Force", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html", "version_or_date": "RFC 3339, July 2002, section 5.6", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-07T07:26:35Z", "relevance": "Timestamp syntax with seconds and offset. Religious calendar rules, uncertain dates and local recurrence require separate typed fields and are not decided by this syntax." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "bundle-identity", "name": "Identity and legal context", "description": "Institution-specific identity and legal context with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-identity", "name": "Institution identity", "description": "Keep community identity independent of name, address, legal vehicle and classification. Record disputed identity without merging records by similarity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-identity", "name": "Persistent identity and recognition", "description": "Keep community identity independent of name, address, legal vehicle and classification. Record disputed identity without merging records by similarity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-identity-1", "kind": "identity", "text": "Which enduring institution is this record about, and which authority issued its identifier?", "answer_data": [ "namespace, institutionId, issuer, aliases, reconciliationStatus", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-identity-2", "kind": "evidence", "text": "What evidence establishes this community record without requiring state registration or a worship building?", "answer_data": [ "selfDescriptionRef, sourceRef, observer, observedAt, confidence", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-identity-3", "kind": "relationship", "text": "Which namesakes or predecessor claims must remain distinct until continuity is evidenced?", "answer_data": [ "candidateRef, relationClaim, claimant, evidenceRef, disputeStatus", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-identity-1", "name": "Institution identity answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: namespace, institutionId, issuer, aliases, reconciliationStatus. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-identity-2", "name": "Institution identity answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: selfDescriptionRef, sourceRef, observer, observedAt, confidence. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-identity-3", "name": "Institution identity answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: candidateRef, relationClaim, claimant, evidenceRef, disputeStatus. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-identity", "name": "Institution identity evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-legal", "name": "Legal standing and representation", "description": "Record jurisdiction-specific recognition and representation without making registration, charitable status or legal personality a prerequisite to community existence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-legal", "name": "Qualified legal-status references", "description": "Record jurisdiction-specific recognition and representation without making registration, charitable status or legal personality a prerequisite to community existence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-legal-1", "kind": "classification", "text": "Which legal or administrative bodies, if any, represent this institution in each jurisdiction?", "answer_data": [ "bodyRef, jurisdiction, legalForm, status, applicability, validInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-legal-2", "kind": "authority", "text": "What instrument supports a representative acting for this community and within what limits?", "answer_data": [ "representativeRef, mandateRef, scope, effectiveInterval, reviewStatus", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-legal-3", "kind": "exception", "text": "How are missing, refused, suspended or disputed recognition claims recorded separately from ongoing community activity?", "answer_data": [ "recognitionRef, claimStatus, authorityRef, evidenceRef, communityActivityStatus", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-legal-1", "name": "Legal standing and representation answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: bodyRef, jurisdiction, legalForm, status, applicability, validInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "data-legal-2", "name": "Legal standing and representation answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: representativeRef, mandateRef, scope, effectiveInterval, reviewStatus. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "data-legal-3", "name": "Legal standing and representation answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: recognitionRef, claimStatus, authorityRef, evidenceRef, communityActivityStatus. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-legal", "name": "Legal standing and representation evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-meaning", "name": "Tradition and teaching context", "description": "Institution-specific tradition and teaching context with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-tradition", "name": "Tradition and self-description", "description": "Allow multiple, absent or disputed concept links. Preserve self-description alongside attributed outside classifications without making a single-parent lineage mandatory.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-tradition", "name": "Attributed tradition placement", "description": "Allow multiple, absent or disputed concept links. Preserve self-description alongside attributed outside classifications without making a single-parent lineage mandatory.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-tradition-1", "kind": "classification", "text": "How does the institution describe its tradition or belief orientation in its own terms?", "answer_data": [ "label, language, sourceRef, authorizedSpeaker, validInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-tradition-2", "kind": "relationship", "text": "Which scheme-specific tradition links are self-described and which are external classifications?", "answer_data": [ "conceptIri, schemeVersion, mappingType, assertedBy, claimBasis", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-tradition-3", "kind": "quality", "text": "What competing labels or lineage claims remain unresolved without overwriting the original assertions?", "answer_data": [ "claimRefs, disagreementType, responseRef, reviewState, visibility", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-tradition-1", "name": "Tradition and self-description answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: label, language, sourceRef, authorizedSpeaker, validInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-tradition-2", "name": "Tradition and self-description answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: conceptIri, schemeVersion, mappingType, assertedBy, claimBasis. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-tradition-3", "name": "Tradition and self-description answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: claimRefs, disagreementType, responseRef, reviewState, visibility. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-tradition", "name": "Tradition and self-description evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-texts", "name": "Texts and teaching references", "description": "Link institution-recognized works and editions with language, scope and custodial restrictions. The model does not own text copyright or rule on canon or doctrinal truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-texts", "name": "Attributed doctrinal resources", "description": "Link institution-recognized works and editions with language, scope and custodial restrictions. The model does not own text copyright or rule on canon or doctrinal truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-texts-1", "kind": "composition", "text": "Which texts or teaching resources does this institution recognize and for what purpose?", "answer_data": [ "workRef, editionRef, recognitionClaim, purpose, sourceRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-texts-2", "kind": "provenance", "text": "Who attributes recognition to the institution and to which version or translation does it apply?", "answer_data": [ "attributorRef, mandateRef, edition, language, translationRef, validInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-texts-3", "kind": "access", "text": "Which resource descriptions or excerpts may be shown under documented rights and community restrictions?", "answer_data": [ "rightsRef, custodianRef, permittedUse, recipientScope, redactionRule", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-texts-1", "name": "Texts and teaching references answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: workRef, editionRef, recognitionClaim, purpose, sourceRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-texts-2", "name": "Texts and teaching references answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: attributorRef, mandateRef, edition, language, translationRef, validInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-texts-3", "name": "Texts and teaching references answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: rightsRef, custodianRef, permittedUse, recipientScope, redactionRule. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-texts", "name": "Texts and teaching references evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-authority", "name": "Governance and roles", "description": "Institution-specific governance and roles with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-governance", "name": "Institutional governance", "description": "Reference adopted governance arrangements without assuming a hierarchy, clergy, trustee board or centralized doctrine. Keep authority disputes visible and time-qualified.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-governance", "name": "Decision authority and institutional autonomy", "description": "Reference adopted governance arrangements without assuming a hierarchy, clergy, trustee board or centralized doctrine. Keep authority disputes visible and time-qualified.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-governance-1", "kind": "authority", "text": "Which body or arrangement is authorized to make each class of institutional decision?", "answer_data": [ "governingInstrumentRef, decisionClass, authorizedBodyRef, scope, validInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-governance-2", "kind": "process", "text": "What institution-specific evidence records a decision as adopted, contested or superseded?", "answer_data": [ "decisionRef, adoptionEvidence, participantsRoleRefs, status, supersedesRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-governance-3", "kind": "constraint", "text": "What conflict-of-interest or delegation limits apply to the recorded decision authority?", "answer_data": [ "constraintRef, delegationRef, conflictAssessmentRef, reviewer, accessScope", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-governance-1", "name": "Institutional governance answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: governingInstrumentRef, decisionClass, authorizedBodyRef, scope, validInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-governance-2", "name": "Institutional governance answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: decisionRef, adoptionEvidence, participantsRoleRefs, status, supersedesRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-governance-3", "name": "Institutional governance answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: constraintRef, delegationRef, conflictAssessmentRef, reviewer, accessScope. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-governance", "name": "Institutional governance evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-roles", "name": "Ministry and service roles", "description": "Religious office, employment, legal trusteeship and data access are separate grants. Permit collective roles, vacancies, temporary mandates and competing claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-roles", "name": "Role definition and appointment evidence", "description": "Religious office, employment, legal trusteeship and data access are separate grants. Permit collective roles, vacancies, temporary mandates and competing claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-roles-1", "kind": "definition", "text": "How is this institution-specific role defined without assuming ordination or one permanent holder?", "answer_data": [ "roleId, localTitle, roleDefinitionRef, holderMultiplicity, vacancyStatus", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-roles-2", "kind": "temporal", "text": "Which evidence supports a holder or collective body occupying the role during the claimed interval?", "answer_data": [ "holderRefs, appointmentRef, start, end, timePrecision, disputedIntervals", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-roles-3", "kind": "authority", "text": "Which powers are religious, legal or administrative and which access grants need separate evidence?", "answer_data": [ "powerClass, mandateRef, limit, delegationRef, accessGrantRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-roles-1", "name": "Ministry and service roles answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: roleId, localTitle, roleDefinitionRef, holderMultiplicity, vacancyStatus. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-roles-2", "name": "Ministry and service roles answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: holderRefs, appointmentRef, start, end, timePrecision, disputedIntervals. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-roles-3", "name": "Ministry and service roles answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: powerClass, mandateRef, limit, delegationRef, accessGrantRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-roles", "name": "Ministry and service roles evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-participation", "name": "Participation and disclosure", "description": "Institution-specific participation and disclosure with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-participation", "name": "Participation and affiliation", "description": "Membership, participation, service use and personal belief are distinct. This model permits minimal authorized references, not a population register or inference from indirect behavior.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-participation", "name": "Restricted relationship assertions", "description": "Membership, participation, service use and personal belief are distinct. This model permits minimal authorized references, not a population register or inference from indirect behavior.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-participation-1", "kind": "relationship", "text": "What kind of institution-person relationship is explicitly evidenced without inferring personal belief?", "answer_data": [ "restrictedPersonRef, relationshipType, assertionSource, purpose, evidenceRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-participation-2", "kind": "lifecycle", "text": "How are joining, correction, withdrawal and former relationship status recorded without treating record retention as continuing belief?", "answer_data": [ "relationshipRef, changeRequestRef, effectiveTime, state, residualRetentionBasis", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-participation-3", "kind": "privacy", "text": "What lawful purpose and sensitive-data condition justify retaining each participation reference?", "answer_data": [ "purpose, lawfulBasisRef, sensitiveConditionRef, necessityReview, retentionRule, controllerRole", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-participation-1", "name": "Participation and affiliation answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: restrictedPersonRef, relationshipType, assertionSource, purpose, evidenceRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-participation-2", "name": "Participation and affiliation answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: relationshipRef, changeRequestRef, effectiveTime, state, residualRetentionBasis. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-participation-3", "name": "Participation and affiliation answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: purpose, lawfulBasisRef, sensitiveConditionRef, necessityReview, retentionRule, controllerRole. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-participation", "name": "Participation and affiliation evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-privacy", "name": "Disclosure and subject protection", "description": "Default to restricted data. A community administrator cannot consent for each person. Consent is not the only possible legal processing condition; any other basis requires qualified review.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-privacy", "name": "Separate institutional and personal disclosure authority", "description": "Default to restricted data. A community administrator cannot consent for each person. Consent is not the only possible legal processing condition; any other basis requires qualified review.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-privacy-1", "kind": "access", "text": "Which fields may this recipient see for the documented purpose at this time?", "answer_data": [ "recipientRole, fieldScope, purpose, authorizationRef, expiry, refusalReason", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-privacy-2", "kind": "privacy", "text": "What consent or other reviewed basis supports a proposed personal-data disclosure and its limits?", "answer_data": [ "basisRef, conditionRef, subjectGrantRef, recipientScope, reviewRef, withdrawalEffect", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-privacy-3", "kind": "security", "text": "Which linkage, inference or small-group exposure risks require suppression of an otherwise public projection?", "answer_data": [ "riskAssessmentRef, linkageRisk, fieldSuppression, approverRole, recheckDate", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-privacy-1", "name": "Disclosure and subject protection answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: recipientRole, fieldScope, purpose, authorizationRef, expiry, refusalReason. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-privacy-2", "name": "Disclosure and subject protection answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: basisRef, conditionRef, subjectGrantRef, recipientScope, reviewRef, withdrawalEffect. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-privacy-3", "name": "Disclosure and subject protection answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: riskAssessmentRef, linkageRisk, fieldSuppression, approverRole, recheckDate. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-privacy", "name": "Disclosure and subject protection evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-observance", "name": "Practices and calendars", "description": "Institution-specific practices and calendars with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-practice", "name": "Practices and observance links", "description": "Institutional practices reference their own definitions. Planned services and evidenced occurrences remain separate; neither proves attendance, participant belief or civil legal effect.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-practice", "name": "Practice definition versus occurrence", "description": "Institutional practices reference their own definitions. Planned services and evidenced occurrences remain separate; neither proves attendance, participant belief or civil legal effect.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-practice-1", "kind": "composition", "text": "Which practice definitions are associated with this institution and by whose account?", "answer_data": [ "practiceRef, localName, attributionRef, institutionalScope, validInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-practice-2", "kind": "event", "text": "Which observance occurrence is evidenced and how is it distinguished from a plan or cancellation?", "answer_data": [ "eventRef, plannedState, observedState, occurrenceEvidence, reportedAt", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-practice-3", "kind": "constraint", "text": "Which access, eligibility or civil-effect claims require separate qualified evidence for the observance?", "answer_data": [ "restrictionClaim, basisRef, authorityRef, effectClaimRef, unresolvedReason", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-practice-1", "name": "Practices and observance links answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: practiceRef, localName, attributionRef, institutionalScope, validInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-practice-2", "name": "Practices and observance links answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: eventRef, plannedState, observedState, occurrenceEvidence, reportedAt. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-practice-3", "name": "Practices and observance links answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: restrictionClaim, basisRef, authorityRef, effectClaimRef, unresolvedReason. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-practice", "name": "Practices and observance links evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-calendar", "name": "Observance calendars", "description": "Retain calendar authority, rule version and local variation separately from timestamps. No automatic conversion or scheduling service is implemented.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-calendar", "name": "Local calendar applicability and uncertainty", "description": "Retain calendar authority, rule version and local variation separately from timestamps. No automatic conversion or scheduling service is implemented.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-calendar-1", "kind": "temporal", "text": "Which calendar and local rule determine the proposed observance date?", "answer_data": [ "calendarRef, ruleVersion, authorityRef, locality, datePrecision", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-calendar-2", "kind": "exception", "text": "How are divergent dates, observational uncertainty and changes to a published schedule represented?", "answer_data": [ "variantRef, uncertaintyReason, announcementRef, supersedesRef, status", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-calendar-3", "kind": "validation", "text": "What checks prevent a date-only or sunset-based observance from becoming an invented precise timestamp?", "answer_data": [ "originalDateExpression, localBoundaryRule, zoneRef, conversionEvidence, validationResult", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-calendar-1", "name": "Observance calendars answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: calendarRef, ruleVersion, authorityRef, locality, datePrecision. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-calendar-2", "name": "Observance calendars answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: variantRef, uncertaintyReason, announcementRef, supersedesRef, status. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-calendar-3", "name": "Observance calendars answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: originalDateExpression, localBoundaryRule, zoneRef, conversionEvidence, validationResult. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-calendar", "name": "Observance calendars evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-resources", "name": "Sites and resources", "description": "Institution-specific sites and resources with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-sites", "name": "Sites and access context", "description": "Reference physical or virtual gathering places only when relevant. Institutional use, sacred designation, custody, ownership and public disclosure are different assertions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-sites", "name": "Qualified place and facility use", "description": "Reference physical or virtual gathering places only when relevant. Institutional use, sacred designation, custody, ownership and public disclosure are different assertions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-sites-1", "kind": "spatial", "text": "Which physical or virtual sites does the institution use, if any, during the relevant period?", "answer_data": [ "siteRef, siteKind, useType, interval, locationPrecision", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-sites-2", "kind": "ownership", "text": "What evidence distinguishes site use, custody, legal ownership and sacred designation?", "answer_data": [ "claimType, claimantRef, titleOrAgreementRef, designationRef, validity", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-sites-3", "kind": "security", "text": "Which location or meeting details are approved for disclosure after exposure and access risks are reviewed?", "answer_data": [ "releaseScope, communityAuthorizationRef, riskReview, embargo, reviewerRole", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-sites-1", "name": "Sites and access context answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: siteRef, siteKind, useType, interval, locationPrecision. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-sites-2", "name": "Sites and access context answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: claimType, claimantRef, titleOrAgreementRef, designationRef, validity. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-sites-3", "name": "Sites and access context answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: releaseScope, communityAuthorizationRef, riskReview, embargo, reviewerRole. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-sites", "name": "Sites and access context evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-resources", "name": "Resources and stewardship", "description": "Reference funds, property and support activities without owning account ledgers or payments. Record restrictions and responsible roles; a gift does not establish donor belief.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-resources", "name": "Resource responsibilities and restricted purposes", "description": "Reference funds, property and support activities without owning account ledgers or payments. Record restrictions and responsible roles; a gift does not establish donor belief.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-resources-1", "kind": "composition", "text": "Which resource or support-service masters are linked to the institution and for what purpose?", "answer_data": [ "resourceRef, serviceRef, purpose, stewardRole, externalMaster", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-resources-2", "kind": "requirement", "text": "Which gift restrictions, stewardship duties or reporting obligations apply under the adopted profile?", "answer_data": [ "restrictionRef, profileRef, dutyHolderRole, evidenceRef, reportingInterval", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-resources-3", "kind": "measurement", "text": "How are approved aggregate activity or resource figures defined without exposing individuals or implying faith prevalence?", "answer_data": [ "measureDefinition, period, unit, method, uncertainty, suppressionRule, sourceRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-resources-1", "name": "Resources and stewardship answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: resourceRef, serviceRef, purpose, stewardRole, externalMaster. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-resources-2", "name": "Resources and stewardship answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: restrictionRef, profileRef, dutyHolderRole, evidenceRef, reportingInterval. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-resources-3", "name": "Resources and stewardship answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: measureDefinition, period, unit, method, uncertainty, suppressionRule, sourceRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-resources", "name": "Resources and stewardship evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-continuity", "name": "Safeguards and continuity", "description": "Institution-specific safeguards and continuity with qualified evidence and externally mastered references.", "rationale": "Authored research grouping informed by cited concepts; no cited source mandates this hierarchy.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-safeguards", "name": "Safeguarding and accountability", "description": "Policy-level references identify accountable roles, independent escalation and review. Confidential case details and investigation execution remain in authorized external systems.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-safeguards", "name": "Policy responsibilities and complaint routes", "description": "Policy-level references identify accountable roles, independent escalation and review. Confidential case details and investigation execution remain in authorized external systems.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-safeguards-1", "kind": "requirement", "text": "Which safeguarding and complaint policies cover this institution and who reviews their applicability?", "answer_data": [ "policyRef, profileRef, accountableRole, reviewDate, coverageGap", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-safeguards-2", "kind": "exception", "text": "What route remains available when a concern involves the institution leadership itself?", "answer_data": [ "independentRouteRef, conflictRule, competentAuthorityRef, accessConstraint", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-safeguards-3", "kind": "evidence", "text": "What limited evidence shows policy review, training or referral without exposing a confidential case?", "answer_data": [ "assuranceRef, reviewOutcome, trainingEvidenceRef, referralReceiptRef, restrictedCaseLink", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-safeguards-1", "name": "Safeguarding and accountability answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: policyRef, profileRef, accountableRole, reviewDate, coverageGap. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-safeguards-2", "name": "Safeguarding and accountability answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: independentRouteRef, conflictRule, competentAuthorityRef, accessConstraint. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-safeguards-3", "name": "Safeguarding and accountability answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: assuranceRef, reviewOutcome, trainingEvidenceRef, referralReceiptRef, restrictedCaseLink. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-safeguards", "name": "Safeguarding and accountability evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-continuity", "name": "Continuity and record disposition", "description": "Institution closure, legal dissolution, merger, split and local record retirement are distinct. Retain only justified history; corrections and lawful erasure must reach permitted projections.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-continuity", "name": "Change, succession and controlled record retention", "description": "Institution closure, legal dissolution, merger, split and local record retirement are distinct. Retain only justified history; corrections and lawful erasure must reach permitted projections.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "q-continuity-1", "kind": "lifecycle", "text": "What evidence distinguishes renaming, inactivity, merger, split and cessation of this institution?", "answer_data": [ "changeRef, changeType, priorIds, successorRefs, continuityClaim, evidenceRef", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-continuity-2", "kind": "retention", "text": "Which local records must be retained, corrected, restricted or erased and who executes the approved disposition?", "answer_data": [ "recordScope, retentionBasis, holdRef, disposition, executorRole, minimalTombstone", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] }, { "id": "q-continuity-3", "kind": "interoperability", "text": "Can an authorized export preserve identity, disputed claims and disclosure limits with explicit mapping losses?", "answer_data": [ "projectionRef, targetProfileVersion, mappingVersion, lossReport, recipientAuthorization", "Include evidence, assessment status and explicit unknown or not-applicable reason." ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-continuity-1", "name": "Continuity and record disposition answer group 1", "description": "Proposed nested field group: changeRef, changeType, priorIds, successorRefs, continuityClaim, evidenceRef. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-continuity-2", "name": "Continuity and record disposition answer group 2", "description": "Proposed nested field group: recordScope, retentionBasis, holdRef, disposition, executorRole, minimalTombstone. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-continuity-3", "name": "Continuity and record disposition answer group 3", "description": "Proposed nested field group: projectionRef, targetProfileVersion, mappingVersion, lossReport, recipientAuthorization. Requires a profile-specific instance schema; absence does not establish a negative fact.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-continuity", "name": "Continuity and record disposition evidence register", "description": "Restricted institution-local index of assertions and referenced records; external authoritative records remain separately mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "structured register", "authorized human-readable view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier and namespace first, governed global IRI second, local UUID third. Use opaque entry ID and revision; never names, religious affiliation or dates as identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "resolve-institution", "name": "Resolve institution identity", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Resolve an exact qualified identifier; return ambiguity instead of merging communities by name, location or tradition.", "inputs": [ "namespace", "institution reference" ], "outputs": [ "resolved reference or ambiguity report" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Read-only resolution; no identity or legal-status change" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "record-institution-assertion", "name": "Record institutional assertion", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Append an attributed institutional description or legal-status reference with scope and evidence; do not register an institution or determine doctrinal truth.", "inputs": [ "institution reference", "assertion and evidence", "expected revision" ], "outputs": [ "assertion revision or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Append source-qualified assertion; preserve competing claims" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "link-role-mandate", "name": "Link role mandate evidence", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Reference a documented role mandate without appointing a holder, resolving disputes or granting system access.", "inputs": [ "role definition", "mandate and interval", "expected revision" ], "outputs": [ "role-link revision or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Append qualified role linkage only" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "record-observance-reference", "name": "Record observance reference", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Link a plan or evidenced occurrence; do not conduct rites, create attendance records or infer belief or legal effect.", "inputs": [ "practice reference", "plan or event evidence", "time precision", "expected revision" ], "outputs": [ "observance-link revision or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Append plan or occurrence assertion with explicit status" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "record-continuity-claim", "name": "Record continuity claim", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Append evidence of rename, split, merger or cessation without automatically merging identity or executing dissolution.", "inputs": [ "change evidence", "affected institution references", "expected revision" ], "outputs": [ "continuity claim or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Append qualified change and unresolved succession claims" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "prepare-projection", "name": "Prepare authorized projection", "description": "Proposed operation, not implemented. Build a local recipient-scoped view after authority and exposure checks. Exclude personal affiliation from public directories; refuse loss of mandatory restrictions.", "inputs": [ "recipient and purpose", "authorization and risk review", "mapping version", "institution revision" ], "outputs": [ "local projection and loss report or refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Verified actor role, purpose and access scope for each referenced record", "Evidence and applicable profile supplied; unresolved authority requires refusal", "For mutation, expected revision and idempotency key must match; otherwise refuse" ], "effects": [ "Create local view and access audit reference; no transmission or expanded access" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-ORG-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional legal or administrative body; generic organization operations remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-PER-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Restricted person identity reference only; no personal belief inference or copied person master.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-BLT-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional building master; site use and sacred designation confer neither title nor physical access.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-CIV-005", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional custom reference with institutional meaning; religious and secular customs may overlap.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "External event and calendar masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Definitions and occurrences remain distinct; no calendar engine or event execution is imported.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "External resource and safeguarding case masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Reference limited purpose and stewardship evidence; financial and investigation operations remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "W3C ORG 2014", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Conceptual organization, site, role and change alignment only; executable mappings remain a hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "SKOS 2009", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Concept-scheme and label mapping only; no universal religion taxonomy.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O 2013", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Attribution and derivation alignment only; no certification of truth or authority.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "An accountable institution data steward and separate privacy and safeguarding roles", "Adopting jurisdiction, source versions, governance instrument and legal-profile review", "Purpose-specific access, retention, incident referral and public-release policies" ], "namespace_guidance": "Use an adopting-Dimension namespace plus opaque institution ID. Community names, addresses and tradition labels are mutable attributes, never identity keys.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-civ-002", "Optional neighbor bindings require pinned model versions before integration" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Normalize technical identifiers only; retain original-language names and dated attribution without forcing tradition labels into one scheme.", "Preserve unknown, absent, disputed, not-applicable and withheld as distinct values." ], "patch_rules": [ "Use stable IDs, expected revisions, idempotency and attributable correction reasons.", "Preserve superseded assertion metadata only as permitted by retention and erasure policy." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Changes to identity, cardinality, disclosure scope or meaning require versioned migration review.", "Never broaden access or coerce a multi-tradition or collective-role record into a lossy singular value." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier with namespace", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "UUID or ULID allocated by the adopting Dimension" ], "timestamp_rule": "Use RFC 3339 timestamps with seconds and explicit offset or Z. Separate event time from observation and ingestion time. Preserve date-only values, uncertain intervals and religious calendar expressions separately; never invent clock precision.", "serial_naming_rule": "Institution opaque ID plus opaque entry ID and revision; no personal names, belief labels or dates as identity.", "integrity_rule": "Hash authorized artifact bytes and record source, revision and transformation. A digest proves neither doctrine nor legal authority. Avoid hashes of guessable sensitive values as public identifiers." }, "policies": [ "Personal religion must not be inferred from attendance, donations, language, family, dress, names or location.", "Institution consent does not replace person-level authority. GDPR is a jurisdiction-limited example: review both lawful basis and sensitive-data condition; consent is not a universal sole basis.", "Public directory views omit membership and affiliation. Location, schedule and role disclosure also require an exposure review.", "Community autonomy does not remove applicable safeguarding or lawful reporting duties; exceptions need competent review and minimum disclosure.", "No theological ranking, forced affiliation or bulk believer-list export. Investigations and any dangerous subject stay at policy and reference level." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Apply deny-by-default field and artifact access with recipient purpose and expiry; log minimum access metadata." ], "create": [ "Create one minimal institution record with evidence and opaque identity; registration and physical site are optional." ], "update": [ "Append qualified corrections with expected revision, authority and evidence; never infer appointment, succession or belief from a local update." ], "delete": [ "The adopting-Dimension retention and deletion executor handles approved local payload erasure, restrictions and minimal lawful tombstones after hold review. Delete expired personal payloads from permitted projections as well; no perpetual history mandate.", "Record retirement does not dissolve an institution, withdraw belief or delete external person, organization, case or property masters." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Institution data steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain authorized institutional assertions without claiming control over individual belief." ] }, { "name": "Governance reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Check mandate scope and competing institutional authority claims." ] }, { "name": "Privacy reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Assess lawful purpose, sensitive-data conditions, disclosure and disposition." ] }, { "name": "Safeguarding lead", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain policy references and competent independent referral routes; case access is separate." ] }, { "name": "Read-only reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Inspect permitted evidence and report mapping or validation gaps without mutation." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny by default at field and artifact level; public institution facts require explicit approved projection, and affiliation remains excluded.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Document statutory or safeguarding disclosure basis, necessity, minimum fields, authorized recipient and independent approval where required; do not treat internal autonomy as a veto on lawful reporting." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record actor role, purpose, grant reference, operation, revision and outcome in the adopting audit system; avoid duplicating sensitive payloads.", "Review denied accesses, consent withdrawal effects and export leakage with restricted audit visibility." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Nearest owner and Dimension policies", "AGENTS.md", "spec.yaml and visible holds", "Pinned referenced models and applicable jurisdiction profile" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed structure for one persistent religious or belief institution with qualified external references. A separate frozen local no-tools self-audit supports a reviewable draft only. Legal applicability, community review, current source verification, external review and executable conformance remain incomplete.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Opaque persistent identity independent of legal registration and names." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidence-qualified continuity, split, merge and cessation without executing external changes." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Optional institution, person, concept, site and role references." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Intervals and observation times distinct from calendar rules and date-only values." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Attribution, competing claims and versioned evidence." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Institution stewardship, personal rights and resource title distinguished." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Research schema validation and refusal rules; executable instance conformance deferred." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Purpose-limited field permissions and reviewed public projections." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local disposition and lawful holds with external master boundaries." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual alignments only; executable mappings and neighbor pins untested." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Names, languages, purpose, institutional status and profile-qualified aggregates; physical measurements delegated to sites." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Explicit evidence and self-description; no sensitive affiliation inference." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposed record operations with preconditions and refusal effects; no religious or legal execution." }, { "dimension": "tradition diversity", "status": "gap", "notes": "Non-hierarchical and unregistered cases supported conceptually; community-led cross-tradition validation still needed." }, { "dimension": "independent review", "status": "gap", "notes": "Claude and Grok skipped under waiver; local audit is not independent external review." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Current source versions, legal applicability, translations and republication rights need adopting-profile verification.", "Nested instance schemas, pinned external bindings, operational mappings and adversarial fixtures remain incomplete.", "Community-led review across non-hierarchical, minority, indigenous, digital and transnational institutions is absent.", "Independent external review is waived; source HTTP checks are unattempted because of the owner-reported sandbox restriction." ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "OSCE guidance is a rights-oriented benchmark, not a globally implemented registration law.", "Charity Commission guidance applies to England and Wales; no universal trustee structure, financial threshold or charity status is inferred.", "The GDPR source is a historical EU text, not current UK law or verified current EU consolidation." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "An unregistered community without premises remains representable.", "Shared names, sites or traditions do not merge institution identity.", "Disputed leadership and collective roles cannot silently grant data access.", "Attendance, donations and former membership cannot establish current belief.", "Withdrawal does not universally erase lawful evidence; retention does not establish ongoing affiliation.", "A proposed observance date cannot become evidence that an event happened.", "A split requires explicit predecessor and successor claims, not automatic identity inheritance." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "The root persists as one organized community across names, offices, practices and legal vehicles. Concepts, persons, places, legal bodies and occurrences remain independently identified references. The registry standalone-mm value is a record-plane classification, not a subject-kind enum. Legacy D6 is reconciled as prior broad domain material rather than silently retained as a multi-root aggregate." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Institution identity and legal standing", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The first two findings separate enduring community identity from state recognition, legal personality and representation. An unregistered institution without a building remains representable; legal-body reference is optional." }, { "concept": "Tradition placement and doctrinal texts", "disposition": "accepted with scope limits", "rationale": "Attributed concept and edition links preserve legacy meaning without owning a universal taxonomy or judging theology. Multiple, absent and disputed classifications replace the legacy mandatory single-confession relationship." }, { "concept": "Governance and role holders", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Governance, religious office, legal trusteeship and data access require distinct evidence. Collective roles, vacancies and competing claims are supported; no role linkage function appoints a holder or grants authority." }, { "concept": "Participation and belief", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Relationship assertions are explicitly restricted and purpose-limited. Attendance, gifts, names or former membership cannot establish present belief. The root is not a believer population register." }, { "concept": "Consent-only legacy rule", "disposition": "rejected as universal law", "rationale": "The historical privacy source allows multiple qualified processing conditions. The draft requires reviewed lawful basis and sensitive-data condition while keeping personal disclosure separate from institution authorization. No unrestricted disclosure follows from a not-for-profit condition." }, { "concept": "Observance occurrence and calendar", "disposition": "accepted as reference model", "rationale": "The practice and calendar findings distinguish definition, plan, occurrence and cancellation. Original date expressions and uncertain calendar boundaries are retained; neither a timestamp nor a calendar reference proves performance or legal effect." }, { "concept": "Site and resource ownership", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Use, sacred designation, custody and title are qualified assertions. Resource ledgers and payments remain external. Aggregate figures require definitions and suppression, and donations cannot be used to infer religion." }, { "concept": "Safeguarding and autonomy", "disposition": "accepted at policy level", "rationale": "Policy references, accountable roles and independent complaint routes cover leadership conflicts without copying confidential cases or executing investigations. Institutional autonomy is not treated as a veto on applicable lawful reporting." }, { "concept": "Continuity and deletion", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "Rename, inactivity, split, merger and legal dissolution are distinct from record retirement. Local history is retention-limited; lawful erasure and projection correction remain possible. Neither deletion nor retention establishes current belief." }, { "concept": "Legacy bindings and conformance", "disposition": "qualified and deferred", "rationale": "The frozen relationship ledger is empty. Proposed organization, person, building and norm links are optional candidates. The legacy broad facility alias is not equated with every site, and wildcard imports and legacy conformance labels are not admitted as proof." }, { "concept": "Proposed functions and service layers", "disposition": "accepted as unimplemented proposals", "rationale": "All six operations have purpose, authority, evidence and revision preconditions with refusal outputs. All eight service sections are present; they do not execute rites, appointments, membership changes, payments, registrations or dissolution." }, { "concept": "Five facets and instance validation", "disposition": "covered conceptually; implementation deferred", "rationale": "Identity, direct nonphysical properties, evidence-based recognition, capabilities and context are explicit. Optional object-shaped answer groups are not executable nested schemas; operational acceptance fixtures and pinned mappings remain holds." }, { "concept": "Evidence and geographical breadth", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "Seven documents were accessible through browser text, with only selected sections reviewed. The privacy text is historical EU material and the charity guidance is regional. Direct HTTP checks were unattempted; zero measured successes is not seven failed responses or proof of currency." }, { "concept": "External provider review", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner instruction. This semantic phase is a separate local Codex self-audit of frozen evidence, not independent second-provider review or provider agreement." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver; the separate local Codex no-tools audit is not an independent second-provider review.", "Live source and version verification remains incomplete. Seven documents were browser-accessible for selected-section review, but direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction. No direct response status was measured. The coordinator must run check_sources.py; HTTP success alone does not prove substantive or current-version verification.", "Adopting jurisdiction, current privacy law, charity applicability, translations, licensing, institutional mandates and community-specific practices require qualified legal and community review. The historical EU privacy text and England and Wales guidance are examples, not global or current-law certification.", "Nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor versions, tested ORG/SKOS/PROV-O mappings, calendar bindings and adversarial acceptance fixtures remain incomplete. Cross-tradition and community-led review is required before operational use; no executable conformance is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Verify current versions, retrieval evidence, reuse terms and legal applicability for each adopting jurisdiction and profile.", "Review the proposed boundary with diverse communities, including unregistered, non-hierarchical, indigenous, digital and transnational institutions, without collecting personal affiliation data.", "Develop nested schemas and fixtures for disputed leadership, collective roles, splits, withheld sites, consent withdrawal, legal holds, calendar uncertainty and lossy exports.", "Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 7, "bundles": 7, "layers": 14, "findings": 14, "questions": 42, "artifacts": 14, "functions": 6 } }