# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-06T12:55:08Z", "synthesisSha256": "24c55bf7f49f8e9153b29b1745b2d913d6a0f3316a9053053a6e74a40e34bb07", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-DAT-007", "registryId": "vr.wm-dat-007", "name": "Data Quality Assessment", "version": "0.3.0-research.1", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "aggregate", "family": "World Models", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "INF.DAT.QLT" ], "tags": [ "data", "quality", "assessment", "inf.dat.qlt" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/publications/wm-dat-007-data-quality-assessment", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-dat-007", "model_id": "WM-DAT-007", "name": "Data Quality Assessment", "entry_kind": "aggregate", "purpose": "Represent one governed, reproducible assessment that qualifies data quality for a declared subject, version, population, purpose and time without treating quality as a universal intrinsic property.", "scope_statement": "Owns assessment identity, version and lifecycle; assessed subject and version bindings; consumer, use case, purpose and fitness criteria; quality framework, categories, dimensions, metrics, rules, thresholds and requirements; plan, population, sample, method, tool and execution references; observations, measurements, violations, scores, uncertainty and purpose-qualified verdicts; evidence, provenance, review, conflicts, annotations, exceptions, issue and remediation references, access, retention, audit and projections. Dataset, data product, contract, schema, pipeline, run, metric registry, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external where authoritative.", "in_scope": [ "Assessment identity, subject and version, purpose, audience, quality model, metrics, rules, thresholds, plan, sampling, methods and execution evidence", "Observations, results, uncertainty, violations, scores, fitness verdicts, evidence, review, conflicts, exceptions, lifecycle, issue and remediation references, access, records and projections" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Owning Dataset, Data Product, Data Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Audit or Records masters", "Treating a pass, score, green dashboard, completed run or certificate as proof of universal correctness, completeness, fitness, safety, compliance or absence of harm", "Autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or physical records disposition" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-DAT-001 Dataset", "distinction": "The unified parent signal and incoming candidate relation identify the assessed dataset and version. The assessment owns source-qualified quality definitions and assertions; it does not own dataset identity, contents or lifecycle.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-DAT-004 Data Schema / Data Contract", "distinction": "A contract or schema owns agreed structure and obligations. This assessment binds a version and records whether bounded rules were evaluated, not the contract lifecycle itself.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-DAT-005 Data Pipeline and WM-ACT-053 Data Processing Job / Pipeline Run", "distinction": "Pipelines own reusable transformations and runs own executions. The assessment references exact runs, inputs and logs while owning the interpretation and verdict for its declared purpose.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] }, { "neighbor": "Issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records", "distinction": "These masters retain independent authority and lifecycles. The assessment stores non-owning references, review evidence, qualified annotations and successor corrections.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-012", "SRC-014" ] }, { "neighbor": "DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN NQAF, OECD QFS, NIST RDaF, QUDT, OWL-Time and RFC 3339", "distinction": "These vocabularies and frameworks have distinct scopes and normative force. Every mapping is version-pinned, profile-qualified and loss-declaring.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Data on the Web Best Practices Data Quality Vocabulary", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/", "version_or_date": "W3C Working Group Note 15 December 2016", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines quality dimensions, metrics, measurements, annotations, certificates, policies and provenance." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Data Catalog Vocabulary DCAT Version 3", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 22 August 2024", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines dataset, distribution, data service, version and catalog projections." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Data on the Web Best Practices", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 31 January 2017", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Grounds quality metadata, version, provenance, feedback and testable publication outcomes." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "PROV-O The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 30 April 2013", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines entity, activity, agent, attribution, derivation, revision and temporal provenance." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Shapes Constraint Language SHACL", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 20 July 2017", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines immutable-input graph validation, reports, focus nodes, severities and constraint provenance." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "JSON Schema Draft 2020-12", "organization": "JSON Schema Project", "url": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12", "version_or_date": "Published 16 June 2022", "source_type": "schema", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines versioned validation vocabularies, bundling and output profiles for JSON." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Semantic Sensor Network Ontology 2023 Edition", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn-2023/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 5 December 2024", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines observation, procedure, feature, property, sample, result and result-quality semantics." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "Data quality model", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standard/35736.html", "version_or_date": "ISO/IEC 25012:2008 confirmed 3 January 2025", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Public metadata defines structured-data quality and stakeholder-dependent characteristics." }, { "id": "SRC-009", "title": "Measurement of data quality", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standard/35749.html", "version_or_date": "ISO/IEC 25024:2015 confirmed 2022", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Public metadata defines measures, target entities and application guidance." }, { "id": "SRC-010", "title": "Information and data quality Concepts and measuring", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/obp/ui?_escaped_fragment_=iso%3Astd%3Aiso%3A8000%3A-8%3Aed-1%3Av1%3Aen", "version_or_date": "ISO 8000-8:2015", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Public preview grounds fundamental data-quality and measurement concepts." }, { "id": "SRC-011", "title": "Geographic information Data quality Part 1 General requirements", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standard/78900.html", "version_or_date": "ISO 19157-1:2023", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Public metadata provides a bounded producer and user geospatial quality-assessment profile." }, { "id": "SRC-012", "title": "United Nations National Quality Assurance Frameworks Manual for Official Statistics", "organization": "United Nations Statistics Division", "url": "https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/50th-session/documents/BG-Item3d-NQAF-Manual-E.pdf", "version_or_date": "15 February 2019", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Provides an official-statistics quality assurance and lifecycle profile." }, { "id": "SRC-013", "title": "Quality Framework and Guidelines for OECD Statistical Activities", "organization": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "url": "https://one.oecd.org/document/STD/QFS%282011%291/en/pdf", "version_or_date": "2011 revision published January 2012", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines relevance, accuracy, credibility, timeliness, accessibility, interpretability and coherence for statistical activities." }, { "id": "SRC-014", "title": "NIST Research Data Framework Version 2.0", "organization": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "url": "https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/1500-18/NIST.SP.1500-18r2.html", "version_or_date": "NIST SP 1500-18r2 February 2024", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Frames research-data lifecycle and fit-for-purpose quality assessment." }, { "id": "SRC-015", "title": "Quantities Units Dimensions and Types Schema", "organization": "QUDT.org", "url": "https://www.qudt.org/doc/2026/01/DOC_SCHEMA-QUDT.html", "version_or_date": "QUDT 3.1.10 15 January 2026", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines quantity values, units, scales, dimensions and uncertainty projections." }, { "id": "SRC-016", "title": "Time Ontology in OWL", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 19 October 2017", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines instants, intervals, durations, temporal reference systems and relations." }, { "id": "SRC-017", "title": "Date and Time on the Internet Timestamps", "organization": "Internet Engineering Task Force", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339/", "version_or_date": "RFC 3339 July 2002", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T12:54:00Z", "relevance": "Defines interoperable timestamps with seconds and explicit UTC relationship." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "assessment-identity-scope-subject-and-purpose", "name": "Assessment identity, scope, subject and purpose", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for assessment identity, scope, subject and purpose.", "rationale": "One quality assessment has an attributable identity, bounded subject and declared fitness purpose.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "layers": [ { "id": "assessment-root-version-state-and-authority", "name": "Assessment root, version, state and authority", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for assessment root, version, state and authority.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status", "name": "Assessment identity, type, version, current head and status", "description": "Records assessment identity, type, version, current head and status as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessment identity, type, version, current head and status?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessment identity, type, version, current head and status, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessment identity, type, version, current head and status?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-data", "name": "Assessment identity, type, version, current head and status data", "description": "Typed assessment data for assessment identity, type, version, current head and status, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status-record", "name": "Assessment identity, type, version, current head and status record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for assessment identity, type, version, current head and status.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for assessment-identity-type-version-current-head-and-status; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability", "name": "Issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability", "description": "Records issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-data", "name": "Issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability data", "description": "Typed assessment data for issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability-record", "name": "Issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for issuer, owner, assessor, sponsor, authority and accountability.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for issuer-owner-assessor-sponsor-authority-and-accountability; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "subject-population-purpose-and-decision-context", "name": "Subject, population, purpose and decision context", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for subject, population, purpose and decision context.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample", "name": "Assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample", "description": "Records assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-data", "name": "Assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample data", "description": "Typed assessment data for assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample-record", "name": "Assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for assessed subject, version, distribution, partition, population and sample.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for assessed-subject-version-distribution-partition-population-and-sample; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion", "name": "Consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion", "description": "Records consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-data", "name": "Consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion data", "description": "Typed assessment data for consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion-record", "name": "Consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for consumer, use case, decision, purpose, fitness criteria and exclusion.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for consumer-use-case-decision-purpose-fitness-criteria-and-exclusion; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "quality-model-dimensions-metrics-rules-and-requirements", "name": "Quality model, dimensions, metrics, rules and requirements", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for quality model, dimensions, metrics, rules and requirements.", "rationale": "Versioned definitions make every quality claim interpretable and challengeable.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "layers": [ { "id": "framework-category-dimension-and-metric-definition", "name": "Framework, category, dimension and metric definition", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for framework, category, dimension and metric definition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope", "name": "Quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope", "description": "Records quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-data", "name": "Quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope data", "description": "Typed assessment data for quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope-record", "name": "Quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for quality framework, profile, category, dimension, version and scope.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for quality-framework-profile-category-dimension-version-and-scope; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation", "name": "Metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation", "description": "Records metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-data", "name": "Metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation data", "description": "Typed assessment data for metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation-record", "name": "Metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for metric definition, indicator, formula, direction, scale, unit and aggregation.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for metric-definition-indicator-formula-direction-scale-unit-and-aggregation; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "rules-thresholds-tolerances-and-requirements", "name": "Rules, thresholds, tolerances and requirements", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for rules, thresholds, tolerances and requirements.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ], "findings": [ { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy", "name": "Rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy", "description": "Records rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ], "questions": [ { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-data", "name": "Rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy data", "description": "Typed assessment data for rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy-record", "name": "Rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for rule, constraint, applicability, threshold, tolerance, severity and unknown policy.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for rule-constraint-applicability-threshold-tolerance-severity-and-unknown-policy; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping", "name": "Requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping", "description": "Records requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ], "questions": [ { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-data", "name": "Requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping data", "description": "Typed assessment data for requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping-record", "name": "Requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for requirement, contract, standard, baseline, target and conformance mapping.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for requirement-contract-standard-baseline-target-and-conformance-mapping; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-plan-method-sampling-and-execution", "name": "Assessment plan, method, sampling and execution", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for assessment plan, method, sampling and execution.", "rationale": "Reproducible methods bind exact subject versions, sampling assumptions and execution evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "layers": [ { "id": "campaign-window-trigger-and-sampling-design", "name": "Campaign, window, trigger and sampling design", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for campaign, window, trigger and sampling design.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "findings": [ { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window", "name": "Assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window", "description": "Records assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-data", "name": "Assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window data", "description": "Typed assessment data for assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window-record", "name": "Assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for assessment plan, campaign, frequency, trigger, reference period and time window.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for assessment-plan-campaign-frequency-trigger-reference-period-and-time-window; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness", "name": "Population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness", "description": "Records population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-data", "name": "Population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness data", "description": "Typed assessment data for population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness-record", "name": "Population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for population, frame, sample, stratum, coverage, weight, bias and representativeness.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for population-frame-sample-stratum-coverage-weight-bias-and-representativeness; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "procedure-tool-inputs-and-run-evidence", "name": "Procedure, tool, inputs and run evidence", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for procedure, tool, inputs and run evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition", "name": "Method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition", "description": "Records method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-data", "name": "Method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition data", "description": "Typed assessment data for method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition-record", "name": "Method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for method, procedure, query, code, tool, version, parameter and precondition.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for method-procedure-query-code-tool-version-parameter-and-precondition; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility", "name": "Execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility", "description": "Records execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-data", "name": "Execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility data", "description": "Typed assessment data for execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility-record", "name": "Execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for execution run, engine, environment, input snapshot, log and reproducibility.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for execution-run-engine-environment-input-snapshot-log-and-reproducibility; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-measurements-results-verdicts-and-fitness", "name": "Observations, measurements, results, verdicts and fitness", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for observations, measurements, results, verdicts and fitness.", "rationale": "Atomic observations remain separate from aggregate scores and purpose-qualified decisions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ], "layers": [ { "id": "observations-values-uncertainty-and-rule-results", "name": "Observations, values, uncertainty and rule results", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for observations, values, uncertainty and rule results.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ], "findings": [ { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time", "name": "Observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time", "description": "Records observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ], "questions": [ { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-data", "name": "Observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time data", "description": "Typed assessment data for observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time-record", "name": "Observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for observation, feature, property, procedure, result, phenomenon time and result time.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for observation-feature-property-procedure-result-phenomenon-time-and-result-time; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit", "name": "Measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit", "description": "Records measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ], "questions": [ { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-data", "name": "Measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit data", "description": "Typed assessment data for measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit-record", "name": "Measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for measurement value, unit, scale, distribution, uncertainty, confidence and limit.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for measurement-value-unit-scale-distribution-uncertainty-confidence-and-limit; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "violations-aggregation-score-and-fitness-decision", "name": "Violations, aggregation, score and fitness decision", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for violations, aggregation, score and fitness decision.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope", "name": "Rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope", "description": "Records rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-data", "name": "Rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope data", "description": "Typed assessment data for rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope-record", "name": "Rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for rule evaluation, pass, fail, warning, unknown, not run, violation and affected scope.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for rule-evaluation-pass-fail-warning-unknown-not-run-violation-and-affected-scope; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use", "name": "Aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use", "description": "Records aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-data", "name": "Aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use data", "description": "Typed assessment data for aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use-record", "name": "Aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for aggregate score, weight, ranking, verdict, fitness, limitation and decision use.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for aggregate-score-weight-ranking-verdict-fitness-limitation-and-decision-use; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-provenance-feedback-issues-and-remediation", "name": "Evidence, provenance, feedback, issues and remediation", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for evidence, provenance, feedback, issues and remediation.", "rationale": "Conflicting assessments and improvement work retain independent sources and authority.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "layers": [ { "id": "evidence-provenance-review-and-annotation", "name": "Evidence, provenance, review and annotation", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for evidence, provenance, review and annotation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody", "name": "Source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody", "description": "Records source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-data", "name": "Source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody data", "description": "Typed assessment data for source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody-record", "name": "Source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for source, evidence, artifact, digest, derivation, revision and chain of custody.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for source-evidence-artifact-digest-derivation-revision-and-chain-of-custody; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence", "name": "Assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence", "description": "Records assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-data", "name": "Assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence data", "description": "Typed assessment data for assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence-record", "name": "Assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for assessor, reviewer, annotation, feedback, certificate, conflict and confidence.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for assessor-reviewer-annotation-feedback-certificate-conflict-and-confidence; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "defects-causes-actions-and-reassessment", "name": "Defects, causes, actions and reassessment", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for defects, causes, actions and reassessment.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference", "name": "Anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference", "description": "Records anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-data", "name": "Anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference data", "description": "Typed assessment data for anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference-record", "name": "Anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for anomaly, defect, issue, root cause, impact, priority, owner and status reference.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for anomaly-defect-issue-root-cause-impact-priority-owner-and-status-reference; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness", "name": "Remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness", "description": "Records remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-data", "name": "Remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness data", "description": "Typed assessment data for remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness-record", "name": "Remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for remediation, corrective action, waiver, retest, verification and effectiveness.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for remediation-corrective-action-waiver-retest-verification-and-effectiveness; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "governance-lifecycle-access-records-and-projections", "name": "Governance, lifecycle, access, records and projections", "description": "Groups governed data-quality context for governance, lifecycle, access, records and projections.", "rationale": "Append-only governance protects qualified claims and declares every projection loss.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "layers": [ { "id": "approval-publication-expiry-exception-and-records", "name": "Approval, publication, expiry, exception and records", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for approval, publication, expiry, exception and records.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "findings": [ { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked", "name": "Draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked", "description": "Records draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-data", "name": "Draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked data", "description": "Typed assessment data for draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked-record", "name": "Draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for draft, reviewed, approved, published, expired, superseded, withdrawn and revoked.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for draft-reviewed-approved-published-expired-superseded-withdrawn-and-revoked; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold", "name": "Exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold", "description": "Records exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ], "questions": [ { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-data", "name": "Exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold data", "description": "Typed assessment data for exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold-record", "name": "Exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for exception, waiver, acceptance, risk, debt, access, privacy, retention and legal hold.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for exception-waiver-acceptance-risk-debt-access-privacy-retention-and-legal-hold; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "audit-correction-interoperability-and-projection-loss", "name": "Audit, correction, interoperability and projection loss", "description": "Groups source-qualified assessment context for audit, correction, interoperability and projection loss.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "findings": [ { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time", "name": "Audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time", "description": "Records audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-data", "name": "Audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time data", "description": "Typed assessment data for audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time-record", "name": "Audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for audit event, correction, successor, observed, recorded, ingested and knowledge time.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for audit-event-correction-successor-observed-recorded-ingested-and-knowledge-time; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection", "name": "DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time projection", "description": "Records dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection as source-qualified assessment context while subject, dataset, contract, execution, issue, remediation, certificate, audit and records masters remain external.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q01", "text": "What stable identity, assessment version, typed value and explicit unknown establish dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "assessment, subject and external master identifiers", "typed value, unit, scale, schema or profile", "unknown, unavailable, disputed and not-applicable states" ] }, { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q02", "text": "Who defined, measured, asserted, reviewed, approved or may rely on dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection, for which purpose and under what authority?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "actor, agent, role, organization and contact", "purpose, stakeholder, authority, policy and access", "conflict, exception, escalation and accountability" ] }, { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-q03", "text": "Which phenomenon, reference, execution, result, effective, published, recorded, ingested and knowledge times, evidence and uncertainty qualify dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "distinct subject, observation and assessment times", "method, evidence, confidence, uncertainty and limitation", "successor, correction, retention and audit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-data", "name": "DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time projection data", "description": "Typed assessment data for dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection, qualified by subject version, purpose, method, source, authority, time, uncertainty and provenance.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection-record", "name": "DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time projection record", "description": "Immutable or successor-versioned assessment evidence for dqv, dcat, prov, shacl, json schema, ssn, iso, un, oecd, nist, qudt and time projection.", "media_or_form": [ "logical data-quality assessment assertion", "definition, observation, result, verdict, evidence, exception, correction or projection record" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Assessment ID plus independent subject-version, definition, observation, result, verdict or artifact ID for dqv-dcat-prov-shacl-json-schema-ssn-iso-un-oecd-nist-qudt-time-projection; title, date, URL, score and digest never identify the assessment alone.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "register-assessment", "name": "Register a data quality assessment", "description": "Governed operation to register a data quality assessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment mandate", "owner", "initial subject reference" ], "outputs": [ "stable assessment head" ], "preconditions": [ "identity, namespace, authority, subject and duplicate checks pass" ], "effects": [ "a versioned assessment exists without mutating the subject" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "bind-subject-purpose-and-audience", "name": "Bind the assessed subject, purpose and audience", "description": "Governed operation to bind the assessed subject, purpose and audience without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment", "subject and version", "consumer use case" ], "outputs": [ "version-qualified scope and fitness criteria" ], "preconditions": [ "subject identity, version, population, purpose, decision and exclusion checks pass" ], "effects": [ "fitness stays purpose-qualified and the subject master remains external" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-011", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "select-quality-model-metrics-and-rules", "name": "Select a quality model, metrics and rules", "description": "Governed operation to select a quality model, metrics and rules without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment scope", "framework profiles", "requirements or contracts" ], "outputs": [ "versioned assessment specification" ], "preconditions": [ "dimension, metric, formula, unit, threshold, tolerance, severity and applicability checks pass" ], "effects": [ "definitions are frozen for the assessment version" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010" ] }, { "id": "define-plan-window-and-sampling", "name": "Define the plan, time window and sampling design", "description": "Governed operation to define the plan, time window and sampling design without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment specification", "subject population", "sampling assumptions" ], "outputs": [ "approved assessment plan" ], "preconditions": [ "population, frame, coverage, strata, weights, bias, reference period and trigger checks pass" ], "effects": [ "sampling limitations and excluded populations remain visible" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016" ] }, { "id": "bind-method-tool-and-execution", "name": "Bind method, tool and execution evidence", "description": "Governed operation to bind method, tool and execution evidence without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment plan", "procedure and executable references", "run and input snapshot" ], "outputs": [ "reproducibility binding" ], "preconditions": [ "method, version, digest, parameters, environment, inputs, authority and log checks pass" ], "effects": [ "the assessment references but does not autonomously execute or own the run" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "record-observations-and-measurements", "name": "Record observations and measurements", "description": "Governed operation to record observations and measurements without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment", "run evidence", "atomic results" ], "outputs": [ "source-qualified observations" ], "preconditions": [ "feature, property, procedure, subject version, value, unit, time and uncertainty checks pass" ], "effects": [ "atomic observations remain distinct from aggregate verdicts" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-016" ] }, { "id": "evaluate-rules-and-derive-verdict", "name": "Evaluate rules and derive a fitness verdict", "description": "Governed operation to evaluate rules and derive a fitness verdict without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment specification", "observations", "aggregation policy" ], "outputs": [ "violations, scores and qualified verdict" ], "preconditions": [ "not-run, unknown, failure, weighting, uncertainty, limitation and reviewer checks pass" ], "effects": [ "the verdict applies only to the declared subject, version, purpose, population and time" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "review-approve-publish-or-withdraw", "name": "Review, approve, publish or withdraw an assessment", "description": "Governed operation to review, approve, publish or withdraw an assessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment head", "review evidence", "authorized decision" ], "outputs": [ "successor lifecycle assertion" ], "preconditions": [ "expected revision, independence, conflict, evidence, access and publication checks pass" ], "effects": [ "issued versions remain immutable and later changes create successors" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-012", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "link-issues-remediation-and-reassessment", "name": "Link issues, remediation and reassessment", "description": "Governed operation to link issues, remediation and reassessment without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment findings", "external issue and action references", "retest evidence" ], "outputs": [ "non-owning improvement and effectiveness view" ], "preconditions": [ "identity, owner, authority, status, due date, verification and residual-risk checks pass" ], "effects": [ "issue closure and remediation execution remain external and are not inferred" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] }, { "id": "query-project-correct-retain-and-audit", "name": "Query, project, correct, retain and audit", "description": "Governed operation to query, project, correct, retain and audit without autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or records disposition.", "inputs": [ "assessment", "target view", "access and records policy" ], "outputs": [ "filtered projection, successor correction or audit event" ], "preconditions": [ "purpose, authority, minimization, mapping, loss, hold and retention checks pass" ], "effects": [ "restricted data stays protected and corrections never rewrite issued evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-DAT-001 Dataset", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Represent the unfrozen parent and incoming candidate composition boundary without ownership, mutation or cascade authority.", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-008", "SRC-014" ] }, { "target": "WM-DAT-004 Data Schema / Data Contract", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve authoritative structural and contractual requirements without absorbing their lifecycle.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009" ] }, { "target": "WM-DAT-005 Data Pipeline and WM-ACT-053 Data Processing Job / Pipeline Run", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve reusable processing and exact executions without acquiring execution authority.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-009", "SRC-014" ] }, { "target": "Data Product, Metric Registry, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Evidence, Audit and Records models", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve authoritative definitions, actions, attestations and evidence without changing their ownership.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] }, { "target": "DQV, DCAT 3, PROV-O, SHACL, JSON Schema 2020-12, SSN 2023, ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8, ISO 19157-1, UN NQAF, OECD QFS, NIST RDaF, QUDT 3.1.10, OWL-Time and RFC 3339", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project version-pinned quality, catalog, provenance, validation, observation, measurement, statistical, research-data, unit and time views with declared loss.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Dimension owner, namespace authority, data governance mandate and accountable data product owner", "Authoritative Dataset, Data Product, Data Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Metric, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Audit and Records registries", "Approved quality framework, sampling, measurement, validation, threshold, fitness, security, privacy, access, retention and interoperability profiles", "Role, delegation, independence, review, exception, publication, correction, issue, remediation, reassessment and agent-operation policies" ], "namespace_guidance": "Mint assessment, version, subject binding, framework, metric, rule, observation, result, verdict, exception, correction and projection IDs; preserve every external master identifier.", "registry_links": [ "https://ver.cy/models/", "https://ver.cy/model-agent-protocol.md" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Canonicalize one assessment by authoritative assessment identifier and issuer namespace, never by subject title, score, date, dashboard URL or report digest alone.", "Keep metric definition, rule, measurement activity, observation, result, aggregate score, verdict, certificate, issue and remediation action independently identifiable." ], "patch_rules": [ "Extensions declare subject type, purpose, framework, dimension, metric, rule, sampling, uncertainty, verdict, privacy, retention and interoperability effects.", "Published assessment versions and source evidence are immutable; changes create linked successors with reason, impact and review.", "Never silently change subject version, population, purpose, metric formula, unit, threshold, sampling design, weighting, uncertainty, verdict or evidence." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Ignore additive fields only when assessment and subject identity, purpose, definitions, values, units, methods, authority, time, uncertainty, access and provenance survive.", "Every projection pins standard, vocabulary, schema, quality-framework and mapping versions and declares information loss." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier for each assessment, version, definition, observation, result, verdict or projection, qualified by issuer, namespace and record kind.", "Governed globally resolvable assessment IRI.", "Dimension UUID or ULID when neither preceding identifier exists." ], "timestamp_rule": "Use RFC 3339 timestamps with seconds and explicit offset or Z; distinguish phenomenon, reference-period, execution, result, assessed, effective, published, corrected, recorded, ingested and knowledge times whenever they differ.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use {assessment-id}--{assessment-version}--{definition-observation-result-verdict-or-artifact-id}--{artifact-kind}--{revision-id}.", "integrity_rule": "Store digest, media type, record kind, assessment and subject scope, framework and method versions, actor, event and knowledge times, confidentiality marking and provenance." }, "policies": [ "The assessment owns its governed case, definitions, observations, results, verdicts and version lineage but not Dataset, Data Product, Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Audit or Records masters.", "Quality is fitness for a declared purpose, stakeholder, subject version, population and time; conflicting assessments may coexist with independent provenance.", "Pass, conformance, score, dashboard color, run completion, certificate and remediation status are distinct assertions and never imply universal fitness or absence of harm.", "Agents cannot autonomously mutate production data or contracts, execute pipelines, change thresholds, widen access, issue certification, close issues, execute remediation, publish assessments or dispose records without delegated authority." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve current head, subject and purpose, framework, metrics, rules, plan, sampling, methods, observations, results, verdicts, evidence, conflicts, issues, remediation references, lifecycle and projection loss under the permitted view." ], "create": [ "Bind stable assessment identity, issuer, subject and version, purpose, consumer, framework, definitions, plan, method, source authority and initial state before results." ], "update": [ "Append successor definitions, observations, results, verdicts, reviews, exceptions, corrections and lifecycle assertions with reason, authority, expected revision, event time and knowledge time." ], "delete": [ "Apply legal hold, reproducibility, privacy, security and adopting-Dimension records policy; withdraw or tombstone only the assessment view without cascading to subject, run, issue, evidence or records masters, and let authoritative systems execute physical disposition." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Data product owner", "responsibilities": [ "Own assessment purpose, consumer outcomes, risk acceptance and accountable use of quality evidence." ] }, { "name": "Data steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own subject semantics, quality framework, requirements, definitions, classifications and retention profiles." ] }, { "name": "Quality analyst and metric author", "responsibilities": [ "Define metrics, rules, methods, sampling, thresholds, aggregation, uncertainty and limitations." ] }, { "name": "Assessment operator", "responsibilities": [ "Bind inputs, tools, runs, observations, logs and reproducibility evidence without changing authoritative data." ] }, { "name": "Independent reviewer and approval authority", "responsibilities": [ "Review scope, methods, evidence, conflicts, verdicts, exceptions and publication decisions within mandate." ] }, { "name": "Subject owner and remediation coordinator", "responsibilities": [ "Receive findings, link external issues and actions, and provide retest evidence without rewriting assessments." ] }, { "name": "Privacy, security and records steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own protected access, minimization, disclosure, legal hold, retention, disposition, audit and projection policy." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny personal or sensitive source data, proprietary rules or logic, credentials, row-level violations, protected evidence and unpublished verdicts unless a purpose-bound policy permits the minimum necessary view.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Declared operations, safety, incident, remediation, privacy, legal, audit or subject-rights access must cite authority, scope, purpose and time limit and must be logged." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Log actor, agent, role, purpose, assessment and version, subject binding, operation, authority, policy, RFC 3339 time, affected metrics or records, source revision and outcome without unnecessary protected-data duplication." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Read Dimension data governance, namespace, dataset, product, contract, quality, security, privacy, access, retention, issue, remediation and agent policies.", "Read this assessment and linked subject, framework, metric, run, issue, remediation, certificate, evidence, audit and records models before mutation." ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "WM-DAT-007 covers one governed data-quality assessment from identity, subject and purpose through quality models, metrics, rules, sampling, methods, observations, results, purpose-qualified verdicts, evidence, conflicts, issues, remediation references, lifecycle, access, records and projections. Domain-specific profiles, restricted standard clauses and independent external review remain deferred.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Identity is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "classification and direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Classification and direct properties is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Recognition and observation is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and possible actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Capabilities and possible actions is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "composition", "status": "covered", "notes": "Composition is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Lifecycle is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Relationships is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Temporal is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "spatial", "status": "covered", "notes": "Spatial is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Provenance is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "ownership and stewardship", "status": "covered", "notes": "Ownership and stewardship is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "validation and quality", "status": "covered", "notes": "Validation and quality is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "access and privacy", "status": "covered", "notes": "Access and privacy is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Retention and deletion is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "covered", "notes": "Interoperability is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." }, { "dimension": "authority and ethics", "status": "covered", "notes": "Authority and ethics is explicit; domain, jurisdiction, subject type, quality framework, method, restricted ISO clauses and independent external review remain held where applicable." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Claude and Grok each timed out on one bounded attempt; no independent external result was admitted.", "The WM-DAT-001 parent signal and candidate incoming COMPOSE relation are not approved frozen composition edges.", "Domain-specific metric catalogues, thresholds, sampling methods, uncertainty models, fitness decision rules and certification schemes require separate profiles.", "ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8 and ISO 19157-1 are used only from public metadata or preview text; access-restricted clauses were not inferred." ], "conflicts": [ "Metric definition, rule, measurement activity, observation, result, assessment, verdict, certificate, issue and remediation action are not interchangeable identities.", "Conformance to one rule or schema is not proof of fitness for another purpose, population, time, consumer or risk decision.", "Missing, unknown, not applicable, not measured, not run, passed, failed, warned, accepted and waived require distinct states." ], "regional_assumptions": [ "Quality requirements, evidentiary weight, certification, privacy, access, retention and disclosure depend on domain, jurisdiction and organization.", "UN and OECD sources are official-statistics profiles; NIST RDaF is a research-data profile and none is universal.", "W3C, JSON Schema, ISO, QUDT and RFC sources are versioned profiles and mappings are not assumed binding, lossless or universally applicable." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Reject an assessment without stable identity, issuer, subject and version, purpose, consumer, framework, method, reference period, source authority, lifecycle and current head.", "Reject silent overwrites of subject scope, population, metric formula, unit, threshold, sampling design, weighting, uncertainty, verdict or evidence.", "Reject autonomous production-data mutation, contract change, pipeline execution, threshold change, access expansion, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication or disposition.", "Reject universal correctness, completeness, fitness, safety or absence of harm inferred only from a pass, score, dashboard color, run completion or certificate.", "Reject a projection that collapses metric, rule, observation, result, assessment, verdict, certificate, issue and remediation identities or hides information loss." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "aggregate", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "The root is a versioned assessment aggregate containing definitions, observations, results, verdicts and review history. It remains distinct from the assessed subject, validation run, metric registry, certificate, issue and remediation action." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Quality as fitness for purpose", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Every verdict binds a subject version, population, consumer, use case, decision, time and limits; no universal quality state is asserted." }, { "concept": "WM-DAT-001 parent and candidate composition", "disposition": "accepted-as-unapproved-reference", "rationale": "The Dataset signal identifies the assessed subject, but the incoming candidate COMPOSE edge is not approved and grants no ownership, mutation or cascade authority." }, { "concept": "Definition, observation and decision identities", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Metric, rule, measurement activity, observation, result, score, verdict, certificate, issue and remediation action remain distinct." }, { "concept": "Contract and schema conformance", "disposition": "accepted-with-scope-hold", "rationale": "A validation result applies only to its exact schema, shape, rule set, subject version and execution; conformance is not universal fitness." }, { "concept": "Sampling and uncertainty", "disposition": "accepted-with-method-hold", "rationale": "Population, frame, sample, strata, coverage, weights, bias, reference period, missingness and uncertainty must be explicit before aggregation." }, { "concept": "Missing and exception states", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Unknown, unavailable, not applicable, not measured, not run, warning, failure, accepted and waived states cannot be collapsed." }, { "concept": "Issue and remediation lifecycle", "disposition": "accepted-external", "rationale": "The assessment links findings, issue and action identities but does not execute remediation, close issues or infer effectiveness from status." }, { "concept": "Certification and publication authority", "disposition": "accepted-with-mandatory-hold", "rationale": "Review, certification, publication, withdrawal, risk acceptance and access decisions require accountable authority." }, { "concept": "ISO source access", "disposition": "accepted-with-limited-claim", "rationale": "ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8 and ISO 19157-1 support only public metadata or preview claims; inaccessible clauses are not inferred." }, { "concept": "Interoperability projections", "disposition": "accepted-with-validation-hold", "rationale": "DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time mappings pin versions and declare loss." }, { "concept": "Single-provider waiver and no-tools audit", "disposition": "accepted-with-mandatory-hold", "rationale": "One bounded Claude Sonnet and one bounded Grok attempt each timed out after 120 seconds. Codex separately audits the frozen validated result and comparison locally without tools or new research facts; assurance remains reviewable-draft." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Absence-of-external-review hold: one Claude Sonnet and one Grok attempt for WM-DAT-007 each timed out after 120 seconds; no external research result was admitted.", "Relation hold: the WM-DAT-001 parent signal and incoming candidate COMPOSE relation are not approved frozen composition edges and grant no ownership, mutation or cascade behavior.", "Purpose hold: fitness, importance, thresholds, weighting, aggregation and acceptance depend on the declared consumer, use case, decision, subject version, population and time.", "Method hold: sampling frame, coverage, bias, missingness, reference values, measurement error, uncertainty and reproducibility require domain-qualified methods.", "Conformance hold: passing a schema, shape, rule or validation run does not prove universal correctness, completeness, quality, safety or absence of harm.", "Authority hold: production-data mutation, contract changes, pipeline execution, threshold changes, access widening, certification, issue closure, remediation execution, publication and records disposition require delegated authority.", "Privacy hold: personal or sensitive source data, row-level violations, proprietary rules, protected evidence and unpublished verdicts require purpose-bound access and minimization.", "Restricted-source hold: ISO/IEC 25012, ISO/IEC 25024, ISO 8000-8 and ISO 19157-1 were used only at public metadata or preview level; access-restricted clauses were not inspected or inferred.", "Interoperability hold: DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT, OWL-Time and RFC projections require release pins, conformance tests and information-loss declarations.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Approve or reject the WM-DAT-001 composition relation and register Data Product, Data Contract, Schema, Pipeline, Run, Metric Registry, Issue, Remediation, Certificate, Evidence, Audit and Records edges.", "Create domain, subject-type, quality-framework, sampling, metric, uncertainty, verdict, certification, privacy, jurisdiction and organizational profiles.", "Conformance-test metric formulas, units, thresholds, aggregation, missing-state behavior, uncertainty and reproducibility against concrete engines and reference datasets.", "Validate organization-specific access, row-level evidence, data-subject rights, publication, risk acceptance, legal hold, retention and disposition policies.", "Test version-pinned DQV, DCAT, PROV, SHACL, JSON Schema, SSN, ISO, UN, OECD, NIST, QUDT and time mappings and obtain independent external review before canonical promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 17, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 24, "questions": 72, "artifacts": 24, "functions": 10 } }