← Back to catalogue
Published

Commercial Contract

vr.wm-eco-006 · wm-eco-006-commercial-contract

Give agents the context needed to identify, form, read, operate and close a legally binding commercial agreement between two or more parties as a jointly owned record, independent of storage format.

World Models Society, people and institutions SOC.ECO.CTR

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 13 layers · 30 findings · 115 questions

Identity and Legal Frame What this agreement is, how it is uniquely denoted, what kind of transaction it governs and which law and forum apply to it.

Agreement Identity and Classification

Denotation of the agreement instance and the coded classification that selects the applicable regime and term expectations.

Agreement Record Identity and Instance Boundary

How one agreement is distinguished from another, which identifier is authoritative, and where a framework agreement ends and a call-off begins.

  1. Which identifier is authoritative for this agreement, who issued it, and is it agreed by all parties? identity
  2. Does this record denote one binding agreement, or a framework whose obligations arise only on call-off? definition
  3. How is a specific executed version of this agreement addressed as distinct from the abstract agreement? composition
  4. If no master-system identifier exists, which Dimension minted the surrogate key and under what authority? authority

Subject-Matter Classification and Applicable Regime

Coded classification of what the agreement does, and the declared applicability or exclusion of regimes such as the CISG.

  1. What class of subject matter does the agreement govern, and under which classification scheme is that code drawn? classification
  2. Are all parties acting in the exercise of their trade or profession, so that the commercial-contract scope applies? constraint
  3. Does the CISG or another uniform regime apply to this agreement, and has it been expressly excluded? requirement

Applicable Law and Dispute Forum

The chosen governing law, the mandatory rules it cannot displace, and the forum agreed for disputes together with the form evidence that forum requires.

Governing Law and Mandatory Rules

Which law the parties chose, whether expressly or tacitly, the severability of that choice, and the overriding rules that apply regardless.

  1. Which law did the parties designate to govern the contract, and is the designation express or tacit? decision
  2. Is the choice-of-law term recorded as severable, so that a defect in the main agreement does not invalidate it? constraint
  3. Which overriding mandatory rules or unfair-term controls apply irrespective of the chosen law? requirement
  4. Does the chosen law cover interpretation, performance and remedies, or is the contract split across several laws? composition

Dispute Forum, Escalation and Written-Form Evidence

The agreed forum, escalation ladder and seat, plus the writing evidence an arbitration agreement needs to be enforceable across borders.

  1. Is the agreed forum a national court, an arbitral tribunal, or a staged escalation ending in one of them? decision
  2. What evidence shows the arbitration agreement is in writing as required for cross-border enforcement? evidence
  3. What escalation stage has the dispute reached and when did each stage begin? state
  4. Under what condition does the forum obtain access to the otherwise confidential record? access
Parties, Identity and Authority Who is bound, in what role, on whose behalf, and with what verified power to bind.

Party Positions and Legal Identification

The roles the agreement creates and the verified real-world entities that occupy them.

Party Position and Contractual Role

The abstract positions the agreement creates, their roles, and how liability is shared where several parties occupy one side.

  1. What role does each party position hold, and from which controlled vocabulary is the role code taken? classification
  2. Where several obligors occupy one side, are their duties joint, several, or joint and several? relationship
  3. How is a party position kept distinct from the legal entity that currently occupies it? definition

Legal Identification and Place of Business

The governed identifier for each party, the verification evidence behind it, and the place of business that drives regime applicability.

  1. Which governed global identifier denotes each party, and what is its current registration status? identity
  2. What is each party's relevant place of business, and how was it determined where several exist? spatial
  3. What evidence supports the link between the named party in the text and the identified legal entity? evidence
  4. How is a party's change of name, registration or legal form recorded without breaking the position link? lifecycle

Authority and Representation

The power of the individuals and intermediaries who bind the parties, and the positions of third parties who are affected without signing.

Signing Authority and Capacity

Who executed the agreement for each party, on what basis they were empowered, and what limits bounded that power.

  1. On what basis was each signatory empowered to bind the party, and where is that basis recorded? authority
  2. What monetary, subject-matter or duration limits bound the signatory's authority at execution time? constraint
  3. If authority was exceeded, is the agreement treated as ratified, void, or binding on apparent authority? exception
  4. Was signing authority verified before execution, by whom, and at what observation time? validation

Agents, Guarantors and Third-Party Beneficiaries

Positions held by parties who act for, secure or benefit from the agreement without being principal obligors.

  1. Which non-principal positions exist, and what right or exposure does each carry? relationship
  2. May a named beneficiary enforce a term directly, and can the parties vary it without that beneficiary's consent? requirement
  3. May an obligor perform through a subcontractor, and does the obligor remain liable for that performance? composition
Formation, Execution and Effectiveness How the agreement came into existence, how consent was expressed and evidenced, and when it began to bite.

Consent and Conclusion

The offer, acceptance or conduct that concluded the agreement, and whose standard terms became part of it.

Offer, Acceptance and Incorporated Standard Terms

The communications and conduct that concluded the contract, when and where they took effect, and which standard terms were incorporated when both sides sent their own.

  1. By what act was the contract concluded: acceptance of a definite offer, conduct indicating assent, or an automated exchange? process
  2. At what dispatch and receipt times did the concluding communication take effect, in each party's offset? temporal
  3. Whose standard terms were incorporated, and how was a conflict between competing form sets resolved? constraint
  4. Was the proposal sufficiently definite as to goods, quantity and price for a binding contract to arise? validation

Execution and Effectiveness

The signature or seal evidence attached to the agreed text, and the conditions that had to be met before it took effect.

Execution, Signature Type and Form Requirement

How the agreement was signed or sealed, the assurance level and validation evidence of that signature, and any form requirement it had to satisfy.

  1. Does any applicable rule require this agreement or a clause within it to be in writing or signed? requirement
  2. What signature or seal type was used by each signatory, and at what assurance level? classification
  3. What validation evidence proves the signature was valid at signing time and remains verifiable now? evidence
  4. When and in which offset did each party execute, and which execution completed the agreement? temporal

Conditions Precedent, Effectiveness and Validity Defects

The gap between execution and effect: conditions to be satisfied, approvals to be obtained, and defects that can unwind consent.

  1. Which conditions had to be satisfied or waived before obligations became enforceable, and what is each one's status? state
  2. How does the effective date differ from the execution date, and does any term apply retroactively? temporal
  3. Is any ground of invalidity asserted, such as mistake, fraud, threat or gross disparity, and by whom? exception
  4. If a term is invalid or unenforceable, does the remainder of the agreement survive? constraint
Agreed Text and Commercial Terms The structure of the agreed text, the documents that make it up, and the substantive commercial and protective terms it contains.

Document Structure and Precedence

How provisions are addressed, which documents constitute the contract, how conflicts between them resolve, and which language governs.

Clause Addressability and Structure

Stable identification of individual provisions across versions, their classification and their machine-readable form.

  1. How is a single provision addressed so the reference survives renumbering in a later amended version? identity
  2. What functional class does a provision belong to, and which classification scheme assigns it? classification
  3. What digest fixes the exact wording of a provision as executed? quality
  4. Which machine-readable rule, if any, is asserted to represent this provision, and who asserted it? interoperability

Constituent Documents, Precedence and Authentic Language

Which documents together form the contract, how conflicts between them are ranked, and which language version controls.

  1. Which documents, schedules and incorporated term sets together constitute the contract? composition
  2. In what rank order do the constituent documents prevail when their terms conflict? constraint
  3. Which language version is authentic, and what status do translations have? definition

Interpretation, usages and subsequent conduct

CISG Article 8 interprets statements and conduct first by a party's intent where the other party knew or could not have been unaware of it, otherwise by a reasonable person of the same kind in the same circumstances, having regard to negotiations, practices, usages and subsequent conduct. Article 9 binds parties to agreed usages and established practices and, unless otherwise agreed, to international trade usages they knew or ought to have known. Article 7 requires interpretation of the Convention itself with regard to international character, uniformity and good faith. UNIDROIT Chapter 4 (as part of PICC 2016) supplies complementary interpretation and gap-filling. These materials are evidence for meaning, not a second contract.

  1. For a disputed statement or clause, did the other party know or could it not have been unaware of the speaker's intent, and if not what would a reasonable person of the same kind have understood? evidence
  2. Which agreed usages, established practices between the parties, or widely known international trade usages are implied into the contract unless excluded? relationship
  3. What subsequent conduct of the parties is to be considered in interpretation, and which negotiation records are in the interpretation file rather than in the four corners of the instrument? provenance

Commercial and Protective Terms

Price and payment, delivery and risk, and the warranty, liability, confidentiality and compliance terms that allocate exposure.

Price, Consideration and Payment Terms

How the price is fixed or determined, in what currency, when payment falls due and what follows late payment.

  1. Is the price fixed, indexed, cost-plus, or determined by a mechanism, and what inputs drive it? measurement
  2. When does payment fall due relative to delivery, invoice or acceptance, and over what period? temporal
  3. What interest, charge or suspension right arises on late payment, and from which date does it run? constraint
  4. Is the price treated as restricted, so that it is withheld from non-party projections? privacy

Delivery Terms, Risk Transfer and Conformity

The trade term governing delivery and cost allocation, the point at which risk passes, and the conformity and inspection regime.

  1. Which trade term applies, of which edition, and to which named place or port? classification
  2. At which event and moment does risk in the goods pass from seller to buyer? event
  3. Within what period must the goods or services be examined and non-conformity notified? temporal
  4. Where is the passing of property recorded, given that this model and the uniform sales regime exclude it? composition

Warranty, Liability, Confidentiality and Compliance Terms

Terms that allocate risk and constrain conduct: warranties, liability caps and exclusions, indemnities, confidentiality, intellectual property, data protection and fairness controls.

  1. What ceiling and exclusions limit each party's liability, and which heads of loss are carved out? constraint
  2. What is warranted, for how long, and what is the exclusive remedy for a warranty breach? requirement
  3. What information is confidential, for how long after termination, and which disclosures are permitted? security
  4. Has any term been screened as unilaterally imposed and potentially unfair under applicable controls? validation
Obligations, Performance and Variance What the agreement requires, when it falls due, what actually happened, and how the parties change or end it.

Obligations and Schedule

The duties the agreement creates and the temporal conditions that make them performable or overdue.

Obligation as Deontic Specification

Each duty expressed with its deontic type, bearer, auxiliary party, source clause and the violation and reparation that follow non-compliance.

  1. Is this norm an obligation, a permission, a prohibition or a right, and who bears it? definition
  2. Which provision creates this duty, and does any other provision qualify or defeat it? relationship
  3. What counts as violation of this duty, and what penalty or reparation is chained to it? constraint
  4. What is the current state of the duty: not yet due, due, performed, waived, or violated? state

Milestones, Due Conditions and Cure Periods

The calendar and event conditions that make a duty performable or overdue, together with grace and cure periods.

  1. Is the duty triggered by a fixed date, an elapsed period, or the occurrence of another event? temporal
  2. How long is any grace or cure period, and from which notice or event does it run? process
  3. Is timely performance treated as essential, so that delay alone justifies avoidance? requirement
  4. Which milestones depend on the completion of others, and what happens when an upstream one slips? relationship

Performance and Non-Performance

What was rendered and accepted, and what happens when performance fails, is excused or triggers a remedy.

Performance Record, Measurement and Acceptance

Evidence that a duty was performed, the measured result against agreed criteria, and the counterparty's acceptance or rejection.

  1. What evidence shows that a specific obligation was performed, and who produced it? evidence
  2. Against which agreed metric was performance measured, and what value was observed? measurement
  3. Did the counterparty accept, reject or accept with reservations, and within what period? state
  4. When did performance actually occur, and when was it recorded in the system? temporal

Non-Performance, Excuse and Remedy

Declared failure to perform, its severity, any excuse such as impediment or hardship, and the remedy elected or agreed.

  1. Is the non-performance fundamental, so that avoidance is available, or merely a delay or defect? classification
  2. Is an excuse asserted on grounds of impediment beyond control or of hardship, and with what evidence? exception
  3. Which remedy has the aggrieved party elected: performance, price reduction, damages, or avoidance? decision
  4. How is the claimed loss quantified, and is it capped or liquidated by an agreed term? measurement

Breach, additional time, cure, suspension and anticipatory breach

CISG Article 25 defines fundamental breach as detriment that substantially deprives the other party of what it is entitled to expect, unless the result was not foreseeable. Articles 47 and 63 allow a Nachfrist additional period of reasonable length; during it the fixing party may not resort to inconsistent remedies but keeps damages for delay. Articles 71–72 allow suspension for apparent future non-performance of a substantial part, with immediate notice and a duty to continue if adequate assurance is provided, and avoidance for clear future fundamental breach. Article 73 deals with instalments. LegalRuleML Violation, Suborder, Penalty and Reparation model the deontic consequence of breach. A breach declaration is a party event, not a court judgment; adjudication is a sibling process.

  1. Has a party declared a breach, is it fundamental under CISG Article 25, and was the detriment foreseeable to a reasonable person in the same circumstances? classification
  2. Has an additional period of reasonable length been fixed, what is its end time, and has the non-performing party offered cure that must be allowed to run? temporal
  3. Has performance been suspended for apparent future non-performance or avoided for clear future fundamental breach, was notice given, and was adequate assurance provided? process
  4. If the contract is an instalment contract, does the breach justify avoidance of one instalment, of future instalments, or of interdependent past deliveries as well? composition

Change, Communication and Closure

Amendment of the terms, transfer of positions, the formal notices that operate the contract, and the way it ends.

Amendment and Variation

Agreed changes to the terms, the formality they require, the clauses they touch and the version they produce.

  1. Which provisions does the amendment insert, replace or delete, and what new expression results? composition
  2. What formality does the contract require for a variation to be effective, and was it met? requirement
  3. From when does the amendment take effect, and does it apply to obligations already due? temporal
  4. How does a reader of an old clause reference reach the corresponding provision in the amended text? interoperability

Assignment, Novation and Change of Control

Transfer of rights or of a whole position to a successor, the consent it requires, and its effect on the record's continuity.

  1. Is the transfer an assignment of rights, a transfer of obligations, or a novation of the whole position? classification
  2. Whose consent was required for the transfer, and what evidences that consent? authority
  3. Does a change of control of a party trigger a notification duty or a termination right? event
  4. After transfer, does the party position identifier persist while the occupying entity changes? identity

Notices and Formal Communication

The formal messages that operate the contract, the channels and addresses they must use, and the rules that deem them received.

  1. Which channels and addresses are valid for a formal notice under this contract? requirement
  2. When was the notice dispatched and when is it deemed received under the agreed or default rule? temporal
  3. What kind of notice is this, and which contractual consequence does it start? event
  4. What evidence proves delivery of the notice to the designated address? evidence

Termination, Expiry and Survival

How the agreement ends, on what ground, which provisions survive and what wind-down obligations remain.

  1. Did the agreement end by full performance, expiry of term, notice, avoidance for breach, or mutual release? lifecycle
  2. Which provisions survive the end of the agreement, and for how long? constraint
  3. What wind-down duties remain: return or deletion of materials, final accounting, transition assistance? process
  4. What status does the record take after termination, and when does it become eligible for disposition? retention
Record Governance, Evidence and Interoperability How the jointly owned record stays trustworthy, who may see what, how long it is kept, and how it is exchanged without leaking terms.

Provenance and Integrity

Attribution of every assertion in the record and cryptographic fixity of the executed text.

Provenance, Attribution and Text Integrity

Who or what generated each assertion, from which source it was derived, when, and what digest and signature evidence fixes the executed text against later alteration.

  1. Which agent is responsible for each assertion in the record, and on whose behalf did it act? provenance
  2. From which source document or message was each derived value obtained, and by what method? quality
  3. Are the time the contractual fact occurred and the time it entered the record kept distinct throughout? temporal
  4. How is the executed text verified as unaltered, and what happens when verification fails? validation

Access, Retention and Exchange

Confidentiality of the joint record, its disposition over time, and the projections through which it interoperates.

Access, Disclosure and Redaction

Who may read which part of the joint record, under what grant and purpose, and how compelled disclosure is handled.

  1. Which grant permits a reader to see a given bundle, layer, finding or artifact, and for what purpose? access
  2. On what grounds may the record be disclosed to a forum, regulator or auditor without party consent? exception
  3. Which elements must be redacted before disclosure outside the parties, and how is redaction proven complete? privacy
  4. Which facts are joint, so that no single party may change or release them unilaterally? ownership

Retention, Limitation Periods and Disposition

How long the record must be kept, what suspends deletion, and how authorised disposition is carried out and evidenced.

  1. Which event starts the retention clock, and what period applies to each class of element? retention
  2. What limitation period governs claims under this agreement, and does it exceed the retention period? temporal
  3. Is a legal hold or dispute suspending disposition, who imposed it, and when may it be lifted? state
  4. How is a personal-data erasure request reconciled with the duty to preserve executed contractual evidence? exception

External Alignment and Projections

Declared alignments to external vocabularies and the reduced views published to non-parties, with what each view omits.

  1. Which external vocabularies are aligned to this model, and is the claim alignment or tested conformance? interoperability
  2. What does each published projection expose, and which elements does it deliberately omit? composition
  3. Where two aligned standards model the same concept differently, which mapping governs and why? constraint
  4. How current is a published projection, and at what observation time was it generated? temporal

Classifiers Filled

Family
World Models
Category
Society, people and institutions
Entry kind
aggregate
Navigation path
NAV.SOC.ECO.CTR
Domain
SOC.ECO.CTR
Industry
Cross-industry
Tags
commercialcontractsoc.eco.ctr
Also called
O5

What it is Filled

Covers the agreement record itself: its identity and classification, the party positions and their authority, how it was concluded and executed, the structure and terms of the agreed text, the obligations and schedule it creates, the record of performance, non-performance, remedy, change, notice and termination, and the governance of that record (provenance, integrity, access, retention, interoperability). Scope is business-to-business commercial contracting, following the HCCH Principles' scope of parties acting in the exercise of their trade or profession. External legal norms, the real-world identity of the parties, procurement award processes and dispute proceedings are referenced, not duplicated.

In scope

  • Agreement identity, subject-matter classification and the applicable legal regime declaration
  • Party positions, their roles, legal identification and signing authority
  • Formation facts: offer, acceptance, conduct, standard-term incorporation, execution and effectiveness
  • Addressable clause structure, constituent document set, precedence and authentic language
  • Commercial terms: price and payment, delivery and risk transfer, warranty, liability and protective terms
  • Obligations expressed as deontic specifications with bearers, source clauses, violations and reparations
  • Milestones, due conditions, cure periods and performance/acceptance records
  • Non-performance, excuse, remedy, amendment, assignment, notice, termination and survival
  • Record governance: provenance, integrity of the executed text, access, retention, disposition and projections

Out of scope

  • Consumer contracts and employment contracts (excluded by the HCCH Principles' commercial scope)
  • The legal existence, powers and internal governance of the parties themselves (organization/person models)
  • The procurement or tendering process that precedes award
  • Conduct of litigation or arbitration proceedings and the resulting awards
  • Statutory and regulatory norms as such; only their declared applicability to this agreement is in scope
  • Payment execution, settlement instruments and accounting entries
  • Transfer of property/title, which CISG Article 4 expressly leaves to the applicable national law
  • Distributed-ledger execution substrates for smart contracts
  • Tax determination, transfer pricing and customs classification

Why it exists Filled

Give agents the context needed to identify, form, read, operate and close a legally binding commercial agreement between two or more parties as a jointly owned record, independent of storage format.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • A jointly owned record of a legally binding agreement between businesses, not a template or a negotiation draft.
  • Turns clauses into obligations with bearers, conditions, violations and remedies.
  • Covers the whole life of the agreement: formation, performance, change, notice and termination.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Sign, accept or execute an agreement on behalf of a party.
  • Alter the executed text.
  • Interpret a clause as legal advice to a party.
  • Disclose confidential terms beyond the parties and permitted recipients.

Only with a human decision

  • Concluding, amending or terminating an agreement.
  • Invoking remedies or sending formal notices.

May

  • Read terms and obligations within the access granted.
  • Track milestones, due conditions and performance records.
  • Prepare notices and change requests for review.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Unequal bargaining power can hide in standard terms; their incorporation should stay visible.
  • Confidential commercial terms must be protected, but obligations affecting third parties should be traceable.

Who is affected

  • Contracting parties
  • Signatories with authority
  • Third parties affected by performance

Owners Filled

Steward

Declare a jointly owned record package per agreement instance in which each party position holds an equivalent mirror and joint facts change only on jointly evidenced events; unilateral acts such as notices are writable by their sender alone.

Roles

Party record steward
Maintain one party's mirror of the joint record and keep it reconciled with the counterparty's mirror; Escalate divergence between mirrors as a dispute rather than resolving it unilaterally
Authorised representative
Execute, amend, assign or terminate on behalf of a party within recorded authority limits; Ensure the authority instrument relied on is current and evidenced at the time of signing
Contract text custodian
Maintain the clause tree, expression versions, document manifest and precedence order; Preserve superseded expressions and the identifier map that links them
Performance recorder and verifier
Record performance events, measured values and acceptance decisions with event and observation times; Attach evidence and flag deemed acceptance only where an agreed rule exists
Access and disclosure administrator
Issue, scope and expire grants over bundles, layers, findings and artifacts; Apply redaction rules and log every disclosure with purpose and legal basis
Records and retention officer
Apply retention rules, limitation periods and legal holds and block disposition while any is in force; Execute and evidence authorised disposition or redaction

Links to other meta-models Filled

references

  • world.organization (O1) - Resolve the legal entity occupying a party position and its governed identifier; entity existence and powers stay in the organization model.
  • world.person (H1) - Resolve natural persons acting as signatories or agents without duplicating personal data in the contract record.
  • world.charter (O4) - Verify signing capacity and delegated powers against the constitutional documents recorded there.
  • world.priceValuation (C7) - Executed prices may serve as price observations under a contribution agreement; the valuation model reads a projection rather than the terms.
  • world.disputeResolution (A19) - Escalated disputes are heard there; this model holds the clause, the written-form evidence and the escalation state.
  • world.stewardship (S1) and world.accessGrant (S2) - Joint ownership of the record and grants over scoped parts of it are administered by the stewardship and access-grant models.
  • Electronic signature and trust service framework - Resolve signature assurance levels, certificates, time-stamp tokens and trusted-list status used as execution evidence.

composes

  • world.procurement (O7) - An award concluded in the procurement model composes into a new agreement instance here; the tendering documents remain in the procurement model.
  • world.auditTrail (S4) - Adds provenance and audit facets to execution, performance, amendment, notice and access events using a standard agent, activity and entity vocabulary.

extends

  • world.insurance (C8) - An insurance policy is a specialised commercial contract that extends this model with cover, premium and claim structures.

aligned

  • OASIS LegalRuleML Core v1.0 - Align the obligation model to a normative deontic vocabulary for obligations, permissions, prohibitions, violations and reparations.
  • OASIS Akoma Ntoso and its Naming Convention v1.0 - Align clause addressing and versioned expression IRIs to an established legal-document naming convention.
  • OASIS UBL 2.4 and ISO/IEC 19845 - Align exchange projections to interoperable business document types for contracting, ordering and delivery without exposing clause text.
  • CISG and UNIDROIT Principles vocabulary - Align formation, performance, non-performance, excuse and remedy terminology to the recognised international contract-law instruments.
  • ICC Incoterms rules - Bind the delivery term data element to a governed classifier that requires both a rule code and an edition to be interpretable.

neighbor

  • world.procurement (O7) - The tendering, evaluation and award process is owned by the procurement model; UBL separates Tender and Contract Award Notice documents from the resulting contract. Award output composes into a new agreement record here.
  • world.organization (O1) / world.person (H1) - The legal entity and its verified identifier (LEI under ISO 17442) live in the party model; this model holds only the party position, its role and the link plus verification evidence. The registry validation flag 'a contract is not an organization' is upheld.
  • world.disputeResolution (A19) - The arbitration or jurisdiction clause, the escalation state and the written-form evidence required by New York Convention Article II are in scope; the proceeding, award and enforcement action are not.
  • Legislation and regulation models - Overriding mandatory rules and statutory regimes (for example CISG applicability, unfair-term controls under the Data Act) are external norms; this model records only the applicability declaration and any opt-out.
  • Trust service and identity models - Certificate issuance, trusted lists and signature-creation devices belong to the eIDAS trust-service domain; this model records the signature type, assurance level and validation evidence attached to execution.
  • world.insurance (C8) and financial master agreements - Specialised agreement types EXTEND this model with domain terms and lifecycle events; their product-specific economics are not duplicated here.

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Authoritative master-system identifier issued by the system of record for the agreement, such as the contract register number of the register the parties have jointly designated as authoritative, where such an identifier exists and is agreed by all parties
  • Governed global identifier or IRI, such as a FRBR-style Akoma Ntoso expression IRI for the executed text or an ISO 17442 legal entity identifier for a party occupying a position
  • UUID or ULID minted by the adopting Dimension, recorded together with the minting authority and mint time, used only where neither a master-system nor a governed identifier is available

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • A contract record has identified parties with signing authority, an executed text, a governing law declaration and obligations.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Register agreement record: Create the jointly owned record for a new agreement with its identifier, party positions, classification and legal frame.
  • Verify party identity and signing authority: Check each named party against the authoritative registry and confirm the signatory's power to bind within its limits.
  • Record conclusion and execution: Capture the concluding communications or signatures, the effective moment and the signature validation evidence.
  • Build addressable clause tree: Convert the agreed text into a hierarchy of addressable provisions with expression and work identifiers and per-node digests.
  • Derive obligation set: Produce deontic statements with bearers, conditions, violations and reparations traced to source clauses.
  • Evaluate effectiveness and conditions: Determine whether conditions precedent are satisfied or waived and compute the current validity state.
  • Monitor due obligations: Compute which duties are due, overdue or within a cure period from due conditions and recorded events.
  • Record performance and acceptance: Attach evidence that a duty was performed, capture measured results and register the counterparty's acceptance decision.
  • Declare non-performance and elect remedy: Register a breach declaration, any asserted excuse, the remedy elected and its quantification.
  • Apply executed amendment: Produce a new expression of the agreed text from an executed amendment while retaining the superseded expression.
  • Issue and track formal notice: Send a contractual notice through a permitted channel to the designated address and record dispatch, receipt and consequences.
  • Verify record integrity: Re-verify digests, signatures and time stamps over the executed text and dependent artifacts and report divergence.
  • Emit projection to a non-party: Generate a reduced view exposing only the elements a declared projection permits, with its omission list and generation time.
  • Apply retention and disposition: Evaluate retention rules, limitation periods and holds, and carry out authorised disposition or redaction with evidence.
  • Avoid or terminate: End the agreement by notice of avoidance, agreed termination or expiry, releasing future duties while preserving dispute and winding-up clauses and triggering restitution.
  • Declare breach and fix additional time: Record a breach declaration, classify it as fundamental or not, and optionally fix a Nachfrist period or demand adequate assurance.
  • Assign or novate: Transfer rights or, with required consent, obligations, and notify the remaining obligor without purporting to move in rem title.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Acting on a superseded version of the terms.
  • Missed notice deadlines and cure periods.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • Accord Project and OASIS LegalRuleML.
  • UNIDROIT Principles and CISG for terms.

Context of use required Filled

  • Electronic signature and trust-service assurance levels and the essential requirements for data-sharing smart contracts are drawn from European Union instruments and are regional alignments, not universal rules.
  • The Hague choice-of-law principles are non-binding soft law whose adoption varies by jurisdiction; the express-or-tacit choice model may not match a given forum's conflict rules.
  • The uniform sales regime applies only where the parties' places of business are in contracting states or conflict rules lead there, and it may be excluded by agreement, so its applicability is recorded as a declaration rather than assumed.
  • Common-law consideration and privity doctrines and civil-law cause requirements differ from the restatement-style formation model used here; formation validity must be re-tested under the declared governing law.
  • Limitation periods, notice-deeming rules and permitted electronic execution formalities vary by jurisdiction and are treated as configuration rather than as model constants.
  • International sales between CISG Contracting States default to CISG unless excluded; purely domestic US goods sales more often meet UCC Article 2, including the § 2-201 writing rule.
  • Rome I Regulation choice-of-law mechanics in the EU were not fetched; HCCH Principles are used as the cross-border alignment and expressly sit alongside Rome I as a non-binding guide.
  • Article 96 writing reservations (for example historically relevant for some CISG Contracting States) must be checked per party place of business rather than assumed absent.
  • Islamic finance, OHADA uniform acts and PRC Contract/Civil Code particularities are not included and would be regional extensions.
  • Places of business, not nationality, determine CISG internationality (CISG Articles 1(3) and 10).
  • The default operating picture is a B2B commercial agreement, including but not limited to international sales, rather than a consumer, employment or purely domestic consumer-protection regime.
  • Party-mirror joint ownership is the stewardship default: each party holds a full record and joint facts change only by joint events.
  • Where CISG and a domestic writing statute both claim to apply, the model records both rules and the Article 96 reservation state rather than silently preferring one.
  • Event time and observation or ingestion time are stored separately whenever a notice, acceptance or breach declaration is transmitted rather than contemporaneously logged.
  • Alignment to a standard is not a conformance claim for any particular agreement instance.

Sources Filled

  1. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 1980) (CISG) - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  2. UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 - International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT)
  3. LegalRuleML Core Specification Version 1.0 (OASIS Standard) - OASIS Open
  4. Akoma Ntoso Naming Convention Version 1.0 (OASIS Standard) - OASIS Open (LegalDocML TC)
  5. Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts - Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH)
  6. Introducing the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) / ISO 17442 - Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)
  7. eIDAS Regulation - electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (Regulation (EU) No 910/2014) - European Commission (DG CONNECT)
  8. United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts (New York, 2005) - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  9. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures (2001) - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  10. Incoterms(R) Rules - International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
  11. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
  12. RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps - Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
  13. ISO 15489-1:2016 Information and documentation - Records management - Part 1: Concepts and principles - International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
  14. Data Act - Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 - European Commission (DG CONNECT)
  15. Universal Business Language v2.4 approved as a Committee Specification - OASIS Open (UBL TC)
  16. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
  17. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 1980) (CISG) — authentic English text - UNCITRAL
  18. LegalRuleML Core Specification Version 1.0 - OASIS LegalRuleML TC
  19. Akoma Ntoso Version 1.0 Part 1: XML Vocabulary - OASIS LegalDocumentML TC
  20. Uniform Commercial Code § 2-201 Formal Requirements; Statute of Frauds - American Law Institute / Uniform Law Commission
  21. UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996) with additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998 - UNCITRAL

Open questions

  • Fetch UCC Article 2 primary text beyond section 2-201 - specifically 2-207 battle of forms, 2-609 adequate assurance, and the 2-706/2-708/2-712/2-713 damages measures - to test whether the accepted anticipatory-breach finding holds under a second, non-CISG regime.
  • Resolve whether an obligation's source may be a legal norm rather than a clause, so that gap-filled statutory duties (CISG Articles 30, 53, 31, 55, 57-59) can be instantiated without a fabricated provision reference.
  • Ground statutory late-payment interest defaults in a verified primary source, or publish the interest-basis element explicitly as configuration with no jurisdictional default table.
  • Assess the 1974 UN Limitation Convention as amended in 1980 as a distinct time-bar instrument against the base retention and limitation-period questions.
  • Evaluate sector standard forms (ISDA Master, FIDIC, GAFTA, BIMCO) and insurance policies as EXTEND profiles, and confirm the base carries the extension points those profiles would need.
  • Compare eIDAS qualified-signature presumptions, UETA/ESIGN state enactments and the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures reliability test to determine whether a single cross-regional signature assurance scale is defensible.
  • Decide whether set-off, plurality of obligors and transfer of obligations (UNIDROIT Chapters 8, 9, 11) belong in the accepted transfer surface or in a sibling model, since neither provider currently owns set-off.
  • Specify the smart-contract execution substrate boundary: whether self-executing performance is evidence of performance only, or requires its own recorded execution state.
  • Consumer and employment contracts are excluded, so unfair-term regimes specific to consumers are not modelled.
  • Statutory late-payment interest defaults were not grounded in a verified primary source in this pass; the model carries an interest-basis element but no jurisdictional default table.
  • Sector-specific master agreement lifecycles, such as derivatives event models, are treated as EXTEND candidates and are not detailed.
  • Tax determination, customs classification and transfer pricing are out of scope even though they depend on the trade term and price elements.
  • Escrow, retention of title and security interests are referenced only at their boundary with property transfer, which the uniform sales regime excludes.
  • Smart-contract execution semantics on distributed ledgers are referenced through the data-sharing essential-requirements source but not modelled as an execution substrate.
  • Automated clause extraction quality metrics are represented only as a provenance confidence field, with no scoring scheme specified.
  • Multi-tier supply chain flow-down of terms to subcontracts is acknowledged in the third-party finding but not modelled as a propagation mechanism.
  • National validity doctrines (mistake, fraud, duress, unconscionability, illegality, consideration in common law) lack a uniform primary schema because CISG Article 4 excludes validity.
  • UCC Article 2 battle of forms (§ 2-207), adequate assurance (§ 2-609) and remedy catalogue were not fetched as live primary text beyond § 2-201; they are regional competitors to CISG, not canonical nodes.
  • UNIDROIT hardship, set-off, plurality of obligors, assignment chapters and limitation Chapter 10 are aligned from the 2016 instrument as a whole; individual articles beyond formation Chapter 2 were not re-fetched in this run.
  • The 1974 Limitation Convention (as amended 1980) is a related sales time-bar treaty and is not modelled as a first-class bundle.
  • Industry standard forms (ISDA Master, FIDIC, GAFTA, BIMCO) and clickwrap or platform terms of service are profiles, not core findings.
  • Smart-contract bytecode, oracles and on-chain settlement have only UNIDROIT automated-contracting comment support and remain an evidence gap.
  • Supervening sanctions, export controls and COVID-era hardship practice are public-law or factual overlays without a dedicated primary contract schema here.
  • eIDAS qualified-signature levels and UETA state enactments were not fetched; MLES is the cross-border alignment used instead.
  • PECL and the Draft Common Frame of Reference were not fetched live and are not treated as canonical.
  • Data-processing addenda, ESG clauses and modern slavery warranties are emerging clause classes without a governing primary standard in the source set.

Machine files

Provenance

world-models research · reviewable-draft

Built from: models/wm-eco-006-commercial-contract/spec.yaml, ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-eco-006-commercial-contract.json