← Back to catalogue
Published

Offer / Quote

vr.wm-eco-021 · wm-eco-021-offer-quote

Represent one governed, versioned pre-contract commercial proposal so agents can understand who proposes what, to whom, for which price and terms, during which validity, with what evidence and response state, without confusing the proposal with a product master, negotiation, order, contract or legal formation decision.

World Models Society, people and institutions SOC.ECO.OFR

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 12 layers · 24 findings · 72 questions

Identity, classification and legal boundary Groups governed offer and quotation context for identity, classification and legal boundary.

Proposal root identity, version, profile and status

Groups source-qualified proposal context for proposal root identity, version, profile and status.

Proposal ID, version, head, title, type, language, purpose and status

Records proposal id, version, head, title, type, language, purpose and status as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish proposal id, version, head, title, type, language, purpose and status? identity
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on proposal id, version, head, title, type, language, purpose and status, for which purpose and under what authority? authority
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify proposal id, version, head, title, type, language, purpose and status? security

Legal offer, quotation, estimate, proposal, tender, order, contract and invitation boundary

Records legal offer, quotation, estimate, proposal, tender, order, contract and invitation boundary as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish legal offer, quotation, estimate, proposal, tender, order, contract and invitation boundary? classification
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on legal offer, quotation, estimate, proposal, tender, order, contract and invitation boundary, for which purpose and under what authority? requirement
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify legal offer, quotation, estimate, proposal, tender, order, contract and invitation boundary? privacy

Participants, authority, addressing and communication

Groups source-qualified proposal context for participants, authority, addressing and communication.

Issuer, offeror, seller, offeree, buyer, customer, agent and beneficiary roles

Records issuer, offeror, seller, offeree, buyer, customer, agent and beneficiary roles as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish issuer, offeror, seller, offeree, buyer, customer, agent and beneficiary roles? relationship
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on issuer, offeror, seller, offeree, buyer, customer, agent and beneficiary roles, for which purpose and under what authority? constraint
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify issuer, offeror, seller, offeree, buyer, customer, agent and beneficiary roles? retention

Mandate, signing and pricing authority, address, channel, delivery, receipt and acknowledgement

Records mandate, signing and pricing authority, address, channel, delivery, receipt and acknowledgement as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish mandate, signing and pricing authority, address, channel, delivery, receipt and acknowledgement? authority
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on mandate, signing and pricing authority, address, channel, delivery, receipt and acknowledgement, for which purpose and under what authority? process
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify mandate, signing and pricing authority, address, channel, delivery, receipt and acknowledgement? access
Offered subject, composition and eligibility Groups governed offer and quotation context for offered subject, composition and eligibility.

Subject lines, lots, bundles, options and dependencies

Groups source-qualified proposal context for subject lines, lots, bundles, options and dependencies.

Product, service, right, resource, SKU, GTIN, description, classification and master reference

Records product, service, right, resource, sku, gtin, description, classification and master reference as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish product, service, right, resource, sku, gtin, description, classification and master reference? relationship
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on product, service, right, resource, sku, gtin, description, classification and master reference, for which purpose and under what authority? event
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify product, service, right, resource, sku, gtin, description, classification and master reference? exception

Line, lot, package, bundle, option, alternative, substitution, dependency, partial and all-or-none rule

Records line, lot, package, bundle, option, alternative, substitution, dependency, partial and all-or-none rule as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish line, lot, package, bundle, option, alternative, substitution, dependency, partial and all-or-none rule? composition
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on line, lot, package, bundle, option, alternative, substitution, dependency, partial and all-or-none rule, for which purpose and under what authority? measurement
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify line, lot, package, bundle, option, alternative, substitution, dependency, partial and all-or-none rule? interoperability

Quantity, recipient, region, channel and prerequisites

Groups source-qualified proposal context for quantity, recipient, region, channel and prerequisites.

Quantity, unit, minimum, maximum, multiple, breakpoint, capacity and availability

Records quantity, unit, minimum, maximum, multiple, breakpoint, capacity and availability as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish quantity, unit, minimum, maximum, multiple, breakpoint, capacity and availability? measurement
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on quantity, unit, minimum, maximum, multiple, breakpoint, capacity and availability, for which purpose and under what authority? evidence
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify quantity, unit, minimum, maximum, multiple, breakpoint, capacity and availability? decision

Eligible recipient, customer segment, region, channel, transaction volume and precondition

Records eligible recipient, customer segment, region, channel, transaction volume and precondition as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish eligible recipient, customer segment, region, channel, transaction volume and precondition? constraint
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on eligible recipient, customer segment, region, channel, transaction volume and precondition, for which purpose and under what authority? quality
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify eligible recipient, customer segment, region, channel, transaction volume and precondition? identity
Pricing, taxes, totals and commercial terms Groups governed offer and quotation context for pricing, taxes, totals and commercial terms.

Price components, currency, basis and calculation

Groups source-qualified proposal context for price components, currency, basis and calculation.

Unit, list, base, net, fixed, estimated, ranged, tiered, recurring, usage and formula price

Records unit, list, base, net, fixed, estimated, ranged, tiered, recurring, usage and formula price as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish unit, list, base, net, fixed, estimated, ranged, tiered, recurring, usage and formula price? measurement
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on unit, list, base, net, fixed, estimated, ranged, tiered, recurring, usage and formula price, for which purpose and under what authority? validation
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify unit, list, base, net, fixed, estimated, ranged, tiered, recurring, usage and formula price? classification

Currency, minor unit, exchange rate, rounding, precision, quantity basis and price validity

Records currency, minor unit, exchange rate, rounding, precision, quantity basis and price validity as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish currency, minor unit, exchange rate, rounding, precision, quantity basis and price validity? measurement
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on currency, minor unit, exchange rate, rounding, precision, quantity basis and price validity, for which purpose and under what authority? security
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify currency, minor unit, exchange rate, rounding, precision, quantity basis and price validity? composition

Tax, allowance, charge, total and payment terms

Groups source-qualified proposal context for tax, allowance, charge, total and payment terms.

Tax category, rate, jurisdiction, exemption, inclusion, exclusion and evidence

Records tax category, rate, jurisdiction, exemption, inclusion, exclusion and evidence as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish tax category, rate, jurisdiction, exemption, inclusion, exclusion and evidence? requirement
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on tax category, rate, jurisdiction, exemption, inclusion, exclusion and evidence, for which purpose and under what authority? privacy
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify tax category, rate, jurisdiction, exemption, inclusion, exclusion and evidence? relationship

Discount, allowance, surcharge, freight, subtotal, tax total, payable, deposit and payment schedule

Records discount, allowance, surcharge, freight, subtotal, tax total, payable, deposit and payment schedule as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish discount, allowance, surcharge, freight, subtotal, tax total, payable, deposit and payment schedule? composition
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on discount, allowance, surcharge, freight, subtotal, tax total, payable, deposit and payment schedule, for which purpose and under what authority? retention
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify discount, allowance, surcharge, freight, subtotal, tax total, payable, deposit and payment schedule? state
Fulfilment, risk, conditions and evidence Groups governed offer and quotation context for fulfilment, risk, conditions and evidence.

Delivery, performance, quality, warranty and returns

Groups source-qualified proposal context for delivery, performance, quality, warranty and returns.

Delivery place, method, window, lead time, Incoterm, shipment, service location and responsibility

Records delivery place, method, window, lead time, incoterm, shipment, service location and responsibility as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish delivery place, method, window, lead time, incoterm, shipment, service location and responsibility? process
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on delivery place, method, window, lead time, incoterm, shipment, service location and responsibility, for which purpose and under what authority? access
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify delivery place, method, window, lead time, incoterm, shipment, service location and responsibility? lifecycle

Quality, acceptance criterion, service level, warranty, support, return, cancellation and remedy

Records quality, acceptance criterion, service level, warranty, support, return, cancellation and remedy as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish quality, acceptance criterion, service level, warranty, support, return, cancellation and remedy? requirement
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on quality, acceptance criterion, service level, warranty, support, return, cancellation and remedy, for which purpose and under what authority? exception
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify quality, acceptance criterion, service level, warranty, support, return, cancellation and remedy? temporal

Assumptions, exclusions, contingencies, rights and confidentiality

Groups source-qualified proposal context for assumptions, exclusions, contingencies, rights and confidentiality.

Assumption, exclusion, dependency, customer input, contingency, risk, change trigger and limitation

Records assumption, exclusion, dependency, customer input, contingency, risk, change trigger and limitation as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish assumption, exclusion, dependency, customer input, contingency, risk, change trigger and limitation? constraint
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on assumption, exclusion, dependency, customer input, contingency, risk, change trigger and limitation, for which purpose and under what authority? interoperability
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify assumption, exclusion, dependency, customer input, contingency, risk, change trigger and limitation? provenance

Permission, prohibition, duty, license, usage right, confidentiality, publicity and data term

Records permission, prohibition, duty, license, usage right, confidentiality, publicity and data term as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish permission, prohibition, duty, license, usage right, confidentiality, publicity and data term? access
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on permission, prohibition, duty, license, usage right, confidentiality, publicity and data term, for which purpose and under what authority? decision
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify permission, prohibition, duty, license, usage right, confidentiality, publicity and data term? ownership
Lifecycle, response and time Groups governed offer and quotation context for lifecycle, response and time.

Draft, issue, effectiveness, receipt, validity and expiry

Groups source-qualified proposal context for draft, issue, effectiveness, receipt, validity and expiry.

Draft, reviewed, approved, issued, sent, delivered, received, effective, open, expired, lapsed and closed

Records draft, reviewed, approved, issued, sent, delivered, received, effective, open, expired, lapsed and closed as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish draft, reviewed, approved, issued, sent, delivered, received, effective, open, expired, lapsed and closed? lifecycle
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on draft, reviewed, approved, issued, sent, delivered, received, effective, open, expired, lapsed and closed, for which purpose and under what authority? identity
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify draft, reviewed, approved, issued, sent, delivered, received, effective, open, expired, lapsed and closed? authority

Issue, effective-from, valid-until, delivery-window, response deadline, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge time

Records issue, effective-from, valid-until, delivery-window, response deadline, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge time as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish issue, effective-from, valid-until, delivery-window, response deadline, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge time? temporal
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on issue, effective-from, valid-until, delivery-window, response deadline, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge time, for which purpose and under what authority? classification
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify issue, effective-from, valid-until, delivery-window, response deadline, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge time? requirement

Withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance and amendment

Groups source-qualified proposal context for withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance and amendment.

Withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance, conduct, silence and response evidence

Records withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance, conduct, silence and response evidence as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance, conduct, silence and response evidence? event
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance, conduct, silence and response evidence, for which purpose and under what authority? composition
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer, acceptance, conduct, silence and response evidence? constraint

Amendment, revision, renewal, extension, supersession, correction, version lineage and comparison

Records amendment, revision, renewal, extension, supersession, correction, version lineage and comparison as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish amendment, revision, renewal, extension, supersession, correction, version lineage and comparison? lifecycle
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on amendment, revision, renewal, extension, supersession, correction, version lineage and comparison, for which purpose and under what authority? relationship
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify amendment, revision, renewal, extension, supersession, correction, version lineage and comparison? process
Governance, validation and interoperability Groups governed offer and quotation context for governance, validation and interoperability.

Source, approval, provenance, access and retention

Groups source-qualified proposal context for source, approval, provenance, access and retention.

Catalogue, price list, cost input, calculation rule, approver, source system, derivation and confidence

Records catalogue, price list, cost input, calculation rule, approver, source system, derivation and confidence as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish catalogue, price list, cost input, calculation rule, approver, source system, derivation and confidence? provenance
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on catalogue, price list, cost input, calculation rule, approver, source system, derivation and confidence, for which purpose and under what authority? state
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify catalogue, price list, cost input, calculation rule, approver, source system, derivation and confidence? event

Confidentiality, access, purpose, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold, tombstone and audit

Records confidentiality, access, purpose, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold, tombstone and audit as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish confidentiality, access, purpose, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold, tombstone and audit? privacy
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on confidentiality, access, purpose, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold, tombstone and audit, for which purpose and under what authority? lifecycle
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify confidentiality, access, purpose, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold, tombstone and audit? measurement

Validation, projection, mapping and conformance

Groups source-qualified proposal context for validation, projection, mapping and conformance.

Identity, cardinality, arithmetic, total, tax, date, eligibility, authority and jurisdiction validation

Records identity, cardinality, arithmetic, total, tax, date, eligibility, authority and jurisdiction validation as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish identity, cardinality, arithmetic, total, tax, date, eligibility, authority and jurisdiction validation? validation
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on identity, cardinality, arithmetic, total, tax, date, eligibility, authority and jurisdiction validation, for which purpose and under what authority? temporal
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify identity, cardinality, arithmetic, total, tax, date, eligibility, authority and jurisdiction validation? evidence

Human, PDF, HTML, JSON, YAML, API, UBL, schema.org, GS1, ODRL, PROV and loss-declaring projection

Records human, pdf, html, json, yaml, api, ubl, schema.org, gs1, odrl, prov and loss-declaring projection as source-qualified proposal context while parties, product and service masters, negotiation, request, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response events and legal formation determinations remain independently identifiable.

  1. What stable proposal, version, line, party, subject, term and external-master identities plus explicit profile and unknown state establish human, pdf, html, json, yaml, api, ubl, schema.org, gs1, odrl, prov and loss-declaring projection? interoperability
  2. Who creates, owns, prices, asserts, reviews, approves, communicates, receives, responds to or may rely on human, pdf, html, json, yaml, api, ubl, schema.org, gs1, odrl, prov and loss-declaring projection, for which purpose and under what authority? provenance
  3. Which issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, withdrawal, revocation, rejection, acceptance, expiry, observation, ingestion and knowledge times, sources and evidence qualify human, pdf, html, json, yaml, api, ubl, schema.org, gs1, odrl, prov and loss-declaring projection? quality

Classifiers Filled

Family
World Models
Category
Society, people and institutions
Entry kind
aggregate
Navigation path
NAV.SOC.ECO.OFR
Domain
SOC.ECO.OFR
Industry
Cross-industry
Tags
offerquotesoc.eco.ofr

What it is Filled

Owns proposal identity, version, declared offer, quotation, estimate or informational profile; issuer and addressed-recipient roles; external product, service, right and resource references; lines, lots, bundles, options, alternatives and dependencies; quantities, units and eligibility; prices, currencies, formulas, tiers, recurring and usage terms; taxes, allowances, charges and totals; delivery, payment, quality, warranty, return, service-level, assumption, exclusion, rights and confidentiality terms; issue, effective, receipt, validity, response, expiry and knowledge times; attributable withdrawal, revocation, rejection, counter-offer and acceptance references; amendments, source, approval, quality, access, retention and loss-aware projections. Party, subject, catalogue, RFQ, negotiation, tender, contract, order, invoice, payment, fulfilment, response-event and legal-determination masters remain authoritative.

In scope

  • Proposal identity, versions, profiles, parties by reference, offered subjects, lines, lots, bundles, quantities, eligibility, pricing, taxes, totals and commercial terms
  • Fulfilment conditions, validity, lifecycle, response references, amendments, evidence, provenance, validation, access, retention and interoperable projections

Out of scope

  • Owning Party, Product, Service, Right, Catalogue, Price List, RFQ, Negotiation, Tender, Contract, Order, Invoice, Payment, Shipment, Performance, Response Event, Legal Decision or Records masters
  • Treating a quotation, estimate, acknowledgement, click, conduct or technical status as universal proof of legal offer, acceptance, formation or enforceability
  • Autonomous pricing approval, tax or legal determination, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or physical records disposition

Why it exists Filled

Represent one governed, versioned pre-contract commercial proposal so agents can understand who proposes what, to whom, for which price and terms, during which validity, with what evidence and response state, without confusing the proposal with a product master, negotiation, order, contract or legal formation decision.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • A pre-contract commercial proposal with a validity period, not an order or contract.
  • Uses explicit profiles: offer, quotation, estimate or informational.
  • Keeps issue, receipt, validity, response, expiry and formation as separate assertions.
  • Differs from a price list, which is a general catalogue not addressed to a recipient.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Approve pricing or discounts.
  • Issue, accept or sign an offer.
  • Determine tax or legal effect.
  • Change terms of an issued version.
  • Disclose one customer's prices to another.

Only with a human decision

  • Approving and issuing an offer.
  • Accepting an offer.
  • Granting exceptional pricing.

May

  • Draft quotation lines from catalogue and price data.
  • Validate totals, taxes and validity dates.
  • Track responses and expiry.
  • Compare alternatives for the buyer or seller.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Offers must be clear and not misleading to consumers.
  • Price discrimination based on personal data can be unfair.
  • Commercially sensitive prices must stay confidential.

Who is affected

  • Customers
  • Sellers and sales staff
  • Competitors in public tenders

Owners Filled

Steward

Dimension owner, namespace authority, accountable commercial owner and delegated pricing and legal authorities

Roles

Proposal owner
Own purpose, scope, profile, lifecycle, compatibility and accountable use.
Commercial and pricing owner
Own subjects, quantities, price inputs, formulas, discounts, charges, totals and approval evidence.
Tax and legal authority
Own jurisdictional tax treatment, legal profile, required disclosures, formation interpretation and limitations.
Sales or procurement operator
Own party, RFQ, communication, delivery, receipt, response and amendment coordination.
Reviewer and approving authority
Own validation, exceptions, segregation of duties and authorization to issue.
Access and records authority
Own confidentiality, privacy, disclosure, retention, legal hold and disposition policy.
Interoperability steward
Own UBL, schema.org, GS1, ODRL, PROV, JSON, API mappings, conformance evidence and declared loss.

Links to other meta-models Filled

references

  • WM-OBJ-003 - Resolve generic object context without granting ownership, mutation or cascade authority.
  • Party, Product, Service, Right, Catalogue, Price List, RFQ, Negotiation, Tender, Contract, Order, Invoice, Payment, Fulfilment, Event and Records models - Resolve authoritative external identities, processes, events and evidence without duplicating their lifecycles.

aligned

  • CISG, UNIDROIT Principles, EU Consumer Rights, UBL 2.3, schema.org, GS1 Web Vocabulary, UN Recommendation 20, ISO 4217, ODRL 2.2, PROV-O, DQV, RFC 3339, JSON Schema 2020-12 and OpenAPI 3.1.1 - Project version-pinned legal, commerce, discovery, policy, provenance, quality, time, validation and API views with declared information loss.

neighbor

  • WM-OBJ-003 parent signal - The unfrozen object parent may supply generic object context but grants no ownership, mutation or cascade authority.
  • RFQ, negotiation, tender, order and contract - A request asks for a proposal, negotiation exchanges positions, a tender follows procurement rules, an order requests performance and a contract records obligations. The proposal references but does not absorb them.
  • Party, product, service, catalogue and price list - These masters supply identities and source terms; the proposal owns only version-specific commercial assertions and references.
  • Acceptance event and contract-formation determination - The proposal records attributable evidence and observed state but does not decide whether acceptance was effective or a contract formed under governing law.
  • UBL, schema.org, GS1, ODRL, PROV, JSON Schema and OpenAPI - Each representation has different semantics and coverage; mappings are version-pinned and loss-declaring.

parent

  • WM-OBJ-003

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Authoritative master-system identifier for proposal, version, line, price component, term, event reference or artifact, qualified by issuer namespace and record kind.
  • Governed globally resolvable proposal or artifact IRI.
  • Dimension UUID or ULID when neither preceding identifier exists.

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Institutional or informational subject: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • An offer names an issuer, a recipient, items, prices, terms and a validity period.
  • Often confused with an order, an invoice, a contract or a price list.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Register an offer or quotation: Governed operation to register an offer or quotation without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Classify profile and jurisdiction: Governed operation to classify profile and jurisdiction without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Compose subject lines and dependencies: Governed operation to compose subject lines and dependencies without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Calculate and bind pricing: Governed operation to calculate and bind pricing without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Bind commercial and fulfilment terms: Governed operation to bind commercial and fulfilment terms without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Review, approve and issue a version: Governed operation to review, approve and issue a version without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Record communication and response events: Governed operation to record communication and response events without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Validate an offer or quotation: Governed operation to validate an offer or quotation without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Amend, correct or supersede: Governed operation to amend, correct or supersede without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.
  • Query, project, retain and audit: Governed operation to query, project, retain and audit without autonomous pricing approval, tax determination, contract formation, acceptance, signature, dispatch, publication, access widening or records disposition.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Accidental binding acceptance.
  • Pricing errors.
  • Expired offers honoured or refused inconsistently.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • OASIS UBL 2.3 Quotation and Request For Quotation documents.
  • Schema.org Offer.
  • GS1 GTIN.
  • ISO 4217 currency codes.
  • UN/CEFACT Recommendation 20 units of measure.

Context of use required Filled

  • Offer formation, revocability, receipt, acceptance, tax, required disclosure, signature and retention depend on governing law, jurisdiction, party type and channel.
  • CISG, UNIDROIT Principles and EU consumer rules are scoped profiles, not universal governing law.

Sources Filled

  1. United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods - United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
  2. UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016 - UNIDROIT
  3. Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights - European Union
  4. Universal Business Language Version 2.3 - OASIS Open
  5. UBL 2.3 Quotation data model - OASIS Open
  6. UBL 2.3 Request For Quotation data model - OASIS Open
  7. Offer - Schema.org Community Group
  8. PriceSpecification - Schema.org Community Group
  9. GS1 Web Vocabulary - GS1
  10. Recommendation No. 20: Codes for Units of Measure Used in International Trade - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
  11. Global Financial Data Standards: ISO 4217 Currency Codes - SIX Financial Information
  12. ODRL Information Model 2.2 - World Wide Web Consortium
  13. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium
  14. Data on the Web Best Practices: Data Quality Vocabulary - World Wide Web Consortium
  15. Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps - Internet Engineering Task Force
  16. JSON Schema Draft 2020-12 - JSON Schema organization
  17. OpenAPI Specification 3.1.1 - OpenAPI Initiative

Open questions

  • Canonically approve the WM-OBJ-003 relation and register Party, Product, Service, Catalogue, Price List, RFQ, Negotiation, Tender, Contract, Order, Invoice, Payment, Fulfilment, Event and Records edges.
  • Create public procurement, securities, insurance, healthcare, utilities, travel, telecom, software subscription, construction and jurisdiction-specific profiles.
  • Conformance-test lines, dependencies, quantities, units, prices, taxes, totals, validity, amendments and projections against concrete UBL and commerce examples.
  • Validate organization-specific pricing, discount, tax, approval, signing, dispatch, publication, access, retention and disposition policies.
  • Obtain authorized legal and tax review before making jurisdiction-specific formation, enforceability, disclosure or tax claims.
  • Obtain independent external research review before promoting beyond reviewable-draft assurance.
  • Claude and Grok each timed out on one bounded attempt; no independent external result was admitted.
  • The WM-OBJ-003 parent signal has no frozen approved relation and grants no cascade authority.
  • Public procurement, securities, insurance, healthcare, utilities, travel, telecom, software subscription, construction and other sector profiles need separate rules.
  • National contract, tax, consumer, electronic-signature, records and privacy rules require jurisdiction profiles and authorized legal review.
  • Schema.org is a discovery vocabulary and does not establish legal effect or full transactional conformance.

Machine files

Provenance

world-models research · reviewable-draft

Built from: models/wm-eco-021-offer-quote/spec.yaml, ver-cy/world-models/card-supplements/wm-eco-021-offer-quote.json