Emission
Describe an identifiable assertion about a quantified environmental release, with its source, boundary, method, evidence and revision history.
Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled
6 bundles · 12 layers · 12 findings · 36 questions
Release boundary Identify what the assertion describes and what remains outside it.
Assertion identity and state
A logical emission assertion persists across corrected quantifications. Proposed local states are draft, assessed, reviewed, superseded and withdrawn; none changes the physical release.
Assertion identity and state
A logical emission assertion persists across corrected quantifications. Proposed local states are draft, assessed, reviewed, superseded and withdrawn; none changes the physical release.
- Which master identifier and revision identify this emission assertion? identity
- What source, constituent, medium and interval define its release boundary? classification
- What evidence supports its current record state without implying that the release stopped? lifecycle
Source attribution and responsibility
Pin the releasing source or explicitly bounded source group and distinguish operator, data steward and reviewer. Stationary, mobile and diffuse sources need different geometry.
Source attribution and responsibility
Pin the releasing source or explicitly bounded source group and distinguish operator, data steward and reviewer. Stationary, mobile and diffuse sources need different geometry.
- Which source master and causing activity are linked to the release? relationship
- Who is accountable for maintaining the assertion and who operated the source during the interval? ownership
- What point, route or area represents the source and how precise is it? spatial
Release description Describe substance, receiving medium, time and dimensional quantity.
Constituent and receiving pathway
Record released substances or declared groups and the environmental boundary crossed. Transfers, treated effluent and ambient observations require explicit classification, not label-based equivalence.
Constituent and receiving pathway
Record released substances or declared groups and the environmental boundary crossed. Transfers, treated effluent and ambient observations require explicit classification, not label-based equivalence.
- Which substance or pollutant group and mass basis does the value describe? classification
- Which receiving medium and discharge boundary distinguish this release from a transfer? relationship
- How are mixed media or unresolved constituents represented without inventing a single total? exception
Quantity and temporal basis
Separate released mass, emission rate and concentration. A rate requires an integration interval, and conversion from concentration needs supporting flow and reference conditions. Unknown, below detection and zero differ.
Quantity and temporal basis
Separate released mass, emission rate and concentration. A rate requires an integration interval, and conversion from concentration needs supporting flow and reference conditions. Unknown, below detection and zero differ.
- What quantity, unit and reference conditions support the stated release amount? measurement
- When did the release occur and when were its observations and results recorded? temporal
- How are zero, missing, censored and invalid values distinguished? quality
Quantification evidence Bind observations, estimation inputs and method versions to the assertion.
Measurement and sampling evidence
Observation references identify the feature, property, procedure and result; source monitoring and ambient sampling are not interchangeable. Calibration and gap treatment are evidence dependencies.
Measurement and sampling evidence
Observation references identify the feature, property, procedure and result; source monitoring and ambient sampling are not interchangeable. Calibration and gap treatment are evidence dependencies.
- Which observations and procedure produced the reported measurement? evidence
- What instrument checks and sampling coverage support use of those observations? validation
- How were outages, rejected samples and substituted values handled? exception
Method, activity and factor evidence
Pin the selected calculation and inputs. Activity times factor is one method, not a universal requirement. Control adjustment is explicit and must not be applied twice to a factor that already represents controlled emissions.
Method, activity and factor evidence
Pin the selected calculation and inputs. Activity times factor is one method, not a universal requirement. Control adjustment is explicit and must not be applied twice to a factor that already represents controlled emissions.
- Which versioned method and activity inputs can reproduce this estimate? process
- Why is the selected emission factor applicable to this source and interval? provenance
- Where are capture, control efficiency and other adjustments already represented? constraint
Quality and review Expose uncertainty, incomplete evidence and the scope of review.
Uncertainty and completeness
Describe uncertainty in method and inputs, correlations and missing coverage. The draft proposes fields for assessment evidence, not an implemented statistical engine.
Uncertainty and completeness
Describe uncertainty in method and inputs, correlations and missing coverage. The draft proposes fields for assessment evidence, not an implemented statistical engine.
- What uncertainty statement accompanies the release estimate? quality
- Which dependencies between inputs or assertions affect uncertainty combination? composition
- Which missing sources, periods or measurements limit completeness? validation
Review and attestation scope
Keep local QC, expert review and independent assurance distinct. A review can cover only specified revisions, sources and periods, and a changed assertion can fall outside its scope.
Review and attestation scope
Keep local QC, expert review and independent assurance distinct. A review can cover only specified revisions, sources and periods, and a changed assertion can fall outside its scope.
- Which checks or external review statements cover this exact assertion revision? evidence
- What reviewer role and independence basis support the stated review status? authority
- What happens to review applicability when inputs or quantities change? lifecycle
Accounting context Expose how a release is used without treating accounting categories as physical events.
Inventory membership and comparability
Keep physical releases separate from reporting allocations. Corporate scopes and national categories are profile-specific; one release may be referenced by multiple accounts without becoming several physical releases.
Inventory membership and comparability
Keep physical releases separate from reporting allocations. Corporate scopes and national categories are profile-specific; one release may be referenced by multiple accounts without becoming several physical releases.
- Which inventory or reporting profile consumes this assertion? relationship
- What overlap rules prevent summing the same release or incompatible reporting boundaries? constraint
- How are original substance quantities preserved when a consumer reports CO2 equivalent? interoperability
Abatement and comparison context
Reference mitigation operating evidence and comparable periods. A lower reported quantity can result from changed activity or method; it does not itself prove an intervention effect or create an offset.
Abatement and comparison context
Reference mitigation operating evidence and comparable periods. A lower reported quantity can result from changed activity or method; it does not itself prove an intervention effect or create an offset.
- Which external abatement measure and operating evidence relate to this assertion? relationship
- What comparable basis supports a before-and-after release comparison? measurement
- Which claims remain unsupported by the observed difference in emissions? decision
Record continuity and disclosure Preserve revisions, evidence and appropriately authorized views.
Revision lineage and recalculation
Record derivation and changes as new revisions. Factor revisions can identify affected assertions, but cannot silently rewrite previously reported values or retroactively extend assurance.
Revision lineage and recalculation
Record derivation and changes as new revisions. Factor revisions can identify affected assertions, but cannot silently rewrite previously reported values or retroactively extend assurance.
- Which immutable inputs and prior revisions explain the current assertion? provenance
- Which input changes trigger a reassessment or recalculation request? event
- What retention and lawful disposition rules apply to local evidence and superseded records? retention
Disclosure and reporting profile
Prepare audience-specific views under applicable authority. Public facility-level reporting can coexist with protected evidence; operator preference alone does not define legal disclosure obligations.
Disclosure and reporting profile
Prepare audience-specific views under applicable authority. Public facility-level reporting can coexist with protected evidence; operator preference alone does not define legal disclosure obligations.
- Which recipient may read this assertion and which evidence fields must be restricted or generalized? access
- Which reporting obligations and exceptions apply to this source and period? requirement
- How is a released view linked to its authorized source revision without exposing restricted evidence? security
Classifiers Filled
- Family
- World Models
- Category
- Physical world and living systems
- Entry kind
- entity
- Navigation path
- NAV.PHY.FLW.EMS
- Domain
- PHY.FLW.EMS
- Industry
- Cross-industry
- Tags
- emissionphy.flw.ems
- Also called
- F6
What it is Filled
The root is a persistent emission assertion for a declared source boundary, substance or pollutant group, receiving medium and occurrence interval. Its revisions can report measured, calculated, estimated or unknown quantities. The physical release and the record describing it are distinct. This draft covers anthropogenic substance releases, including GHGs, to air, water and land; it is neither an entire inventory nor an environmental-control system.
In scope
- Release assertion identity and revision, source attribution, constituent and medium, occurrence and observation times
- Measurement and estimation evidence, quantity basis, uncertainty, completeness, review and restatement
- Profile-qualified inventory membership and disclosure references, including optional abatement evidence
Out of scope
- Source asset, activity, operator and land-parcel master lifecycles; operating energy, waste, freight or passenger systems
- Dispersion, deposition, ambient quality, exposure and ecological impact simulation; removals and sinks as independent physical fluxes
- Corporate inventory consolidation, product footprints, offset credits and sustainability claims as separately governed objects
- Enforcement, regulatory submission, emergency response, shutdown, instrumentation actuation or issuing assurance opinions
- Heat, noise, radiation and natural-flux profiles until separately researched and dimensionally specified
Why it exists Filled
Describe an identifiable assertion about a quantified environmental release, with its source, boundary, method, evidence and revision history.
Distinguishing features Derived, awaiting review
- Unlike Legacy F6 Emission & Environmental Flux: Reconcile as an input, not authority. Preserve method and evidence concerns; replace mandatory factor and verification links with method-dependent and state-dependent links. Ambient flux and abatement operations remain external. Legacy wildcard imports and conformance labels are not inherited.
- Unlike WM-FLW-001 Energy; WM-FLW-005 Waste / Circular; WM-FLW-004 Goods Movement / Logistics; WM-FLW-007 Passenger Mobility: Reference versioned activity evidence. Waste transfer is not automatically an environmental release. No activity scheduling, waste treatment or transport execution belongs here.
- Unlike WM-PLC-002 Land Parcel and source asset masters: Location or source references do not imply parcel ownership, operator liability or ownership of the physical activity.
- Unlike WM-ECO-014 Sustainability Claim / PCF: An emission assertion can supply evidence to a separately governed footprint or claim; allocation, product lifecycle claims, credit issuance and marketing assertions are not owned here.
- Unlike Ambient observations, removals and mitigation projects: Ambient concentration alone is not emitted mass; an inverse model needs an explicit method boundary. A removal or avoided-release claim must not be silently stored as a negative physical release.
Note: Derived from boundary notes against neighbouring models.
What robots and AI may and may not do Derived, awaiting review
Must not
- Use optimistic revision checks and an explicit patch reason; never overwrite measurements or reported historical values silently.
May
- Register release assertion: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Create a local assertion with explicit unknowns and source boundary; this does not cause or authorize a release.
- Bind observation evidence: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Link observation revisions without changing device or observation masters.
- Prepare reproducible estimate: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Prepare a local result through an adopting implementation with pinned inputs and method.
- Assess assertion consistency: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Evaluate proposed local data checks, not legal compliance or independent assurance.
- Propose restatement: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Prepare an explicitly linked correction after changed evidence.
- Prepare authorized evidence view: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Build a local recipient-specific export for review; transport and formal submission are external.
Note: Derived from functions, policies, CRUD and access rules; prohibitions were not authored for agents as such.
Moral aspects Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Owners Filled
Steward
Declare the adopting Dimension, data steward role and authority for local assertions.
Roles
- Assertion steward
- Maintain identity, profile bindings and authorized local corrections.
- Evidence custodian
- Resolve source evidence and record coverage, access and retention limits.
- Quantification analyst
- Document method applicability, units, calculations and uncertainty without issuing assurance.
- Review assessor
- Record review scope and independence evidence; distinguish own checks from external assurance.
- Disclosure custodian
- Apply recipient policy, legal reporting references and approved redactions.
Links to other meta-models Filled
references
- WM-FLW-001 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Pin energy activity evidence; energy asset and flow operations stay in the target.
- WM-FLW-005 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Pin waste treatment activity or transfer evidence; do not treat every transfer as a release.
- WM-FLW-004 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Pin freight movement activity used by a selected method; transport operations stay external.
- WM-FLW-007 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Pin passenger activity evidence without owning travel scheduling or service operations.
- WM-PLC-002 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Reference a parcel for a stationary source where applicable; parcel ownership and geometry masters stay external.
- WM-ECO-014 - Candidate binding requiring version resolution. Provide emission evidence to separately governed sustainability or product footprint claims; no claim or credit issuance.
aligned
- IPCC 2006 Guidelines - National GHG method and quality concepts only; source-sector profiles and later refinements need separate verification.
- GHG Protocol Corporate Standard - Qualified accounting-context references only, not physical ownership or universal compliance.
- SOSA/SSN - Conceptual observation evidence mapping; no implemented conformance.
- PROV-O - Conceptual lineage and attribution mapping; no certification of truth.
neighbor
- Legacy F6 Emission & Environmental Flux - Reconcile as an input, not authority. Preserve method and evidence concerns; replace mandatory factor and verification links with method-dependent and state-dependent links. Ambient flux and abatement operations remain external. Legacy wildcard imports and conformance labels are not inherited.
- WM-FLW-001 Energy; WM-FLW-005 Waste / Circular; WM-FLW-004 Goods Movement / Logistics; WM-FLW-007 Passenger Mobility - Reference versioned activity evidence. Waste transfer is not automatically an environmental release. No activity scheduling, waste treatment or transport execution belongs here.
- WM-PLC-002 Land Parcel and source asset masters - Location or source references do not imply parcel ownership, operator liability or ownership of the physical activity.
- WM-ECO-014 Sustainability Claim / PCF - An emission assertion can supply evidence to a separately governed footprint or claim; allocation, product lifecycle claims, credit issuance and marketing assertions are not owned here.
- Ambient observations, removals and mitigation projects - Ambient concentration alone is not emitted mass; an inverse model needs an explicit method boundary. A removal or avoided-release claim must not be silently stored as a negative physical release.
What else AI and robots need to interact with it Incomplete
Identity and identifiers required Filled
- Authoritative master-system identifier
- Governed global identifier or IRI
- UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension
Direct properties required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Recognition required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Capabilities and actions required Filled
- Register release assertion: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Create a local assertion with explicit unknowns and source boundary; this does not cause or authorize a release.
- Bind observation evidence: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Link observation revisions without changing device or observation masters.
- Prepare reproducible estimate: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Prepare a local result through an adopting implementation with pinned inputs and method.
- Assess assertion consistency: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Evaluate proposed local data checks, not legal compliance or independent assurance.
- Propose restatement: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Prepare an explicitly linked correction after changed evidence.
- Prepare authorized evidence view: Proposed local operation, not implemented. Build a local recipient-specific export for review; transport and formal submission are external.
Hazards and failure modes required Missing, in the backlog
Not described yet. This gap is in the card backlog.
Standards and interfaces required Derived, awaiting review
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology
Context of use required Filled
- IPCC evidence concerns national GHG inventories; it is not a universal multi-pollutant reporting rule.
- EPA factor guidance is United States air-emission guidance; UNECE overview gives PRTR concepts, not a complete jurisdiction profile.
- The 2004 corporate standard is used for accounting distinctions; later amendments and Scope 2 rules need independent current-version review.
Sources Filled
- Content of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
- 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 1, Chapter 1: Introduction - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- AP-42 Introduction - United States Environmental Protection Agency
- Semantic Sensor Network Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium and Open Geospatial Consortium
- 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 1, Chapter 3: Uncertainties - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- 2006 IPCC Guidelines, Volume 1, Chapter 6: Quality Assurance / Quality Control and Verification - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
- GHG Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition - World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development
- PROV-O: The PROV Ontology - World Wide Web Consortium
Open questions
- Verify source responses, current editions and applicable sector or jurisdiction rules, including UNECE full context and subsequent IPCC and corporate-accounting updates.
- Develop tested instance schemas and mappings with fixtures for overlapping intervals, group totals, censored data, control adjustments, changed factors, incompatible gas metrics and review-scope changes.
- Research separate dimensional profiles for energy releases, natural fluxes and removals before extending the core boundary.
- Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion.
- Heat, noise, radiation, natural flux, inverse dispersion and sink/removal profiles need separate research.
- Sector-specific methods, current legal reporting thresholds, current editions, licenses and jurisdiction applicability are not fully verified.
- Nested instance schemas, unit conversions, calculation implementations, acceptance fixtures and pinned neighbor bindings remain incomplete.
- Independent external provider review absent; live source/version verification remains open.
Machine files
Provenance
world-models research · reviewable-draft
Built from: models/wm-flw-006-emission/spec.yaml