# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-06T21:49:32Z", "synthesisSha256": "4a3e3f38d3b6c0f53ae0fdf3a1bd10b4c4fbff47a662ef760d8ca3a9cdc50213", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-KNW-009", "registryId": "vr.wm-knw-009", "name": "Hypothesis", "version": "0.3.0-research.1", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "INF.KNW.HYP" ], "tags": [ "hypothesis", "inf.knw.hyp" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-knw-009-hypothesis/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-knw-009", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-knw-009", "model_id": "WM-KNW-009", "name": "Hypothesis", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Represent a versioned provisional proposition with explicit scope, operationalization, predictions, evaluation criteria and source-qualified assessment and revision history.", "scope_statement": "Owns hypothesis identity and revision; proposition expressions; hypothesis kind and profile; subject domain, population, unit, variables, relationships, conditions and boundary; proposer, owner, source, motivation, rationale, assumptions and prior-evidence references; operational definitions, measures, estimands, predictions, falsifiers and criteria; preregistration and deviations; study, test, dataset, analysis, result and evidence references; source-qualified assessments, uncertainty, conflicts, review, correction, lifecycle, access, retention and loss-aware projections. Generic claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, protocols, tests, data, observations, results, evidence, citations, publications, people, organizations, decisions and policies remain external masters.", "in_scope": [ "Hypothesis identity, formulation, kind, scope, variables, conditions, revision and successor lineage", "Rationale, assumptions, prior evidence, operationalization, predictions, criteria, preregistration and evaluation bindings", "Assessment, uncertainty, conflict, lifecycle, provenance, governance, access, retention and interoperability" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Owning generic claim, assumption, theory, question, study, protocol, test, dataset, observation, result, evidence, citation, publication, party, decision or policy lifecycles", "Equating hypothesis with question, assumption, prediction, theory, model, objective, requirement, result or truth, or equating non-rejection, statistical significance, practical importance, causality and truth", "Executing research participation, experiments, protected-data access, publication, policy decisions, external system mutation or irreversible deletion" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-KNW-007 Claim / Proposition", "distinction": "Hypothesis specializes a proposition as provisional and evaluable through scope, predictions and criteria. Generic claim identity and assertion lifecycle remain external; the candidate parent signal is held for review.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-022" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-KNW-016 Assumption", "distinction": "An assumption is a premise accepted for a bounded purpose. A hypothesis is proposed for evaluation; assumptions it depends on remain separately identifiable.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-012", "SRC-015" ] }, { "neighbor": "Research question, theory, model and prediction", "distinction": "A question solicits an answer, a theory or model supplies explanatory structure and a prediction states an expected observation. The hypothesis links them without importing their identities.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] }, { "neighbor": "Study, protocol, test and preregistration", "distinction": "These define or execute an evaluation. The hypothesis records typed references, criteria and deviations but not operational study lifecycle.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-012" ] }, { "neighbor": "Result, evidence and assessment", "distinction": "Results and evidence are external records. The hypothesis owns source-qualified assessment links but no context-free truth flag.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-017" ] }, { "neighbor": "Decision and policy", "distinction": "An assessment may inform an external decision, but the accountable choice, policy, clinical action or regulatory consequence is not owned by the hypothesis.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-018" ] }, { "neighbor": "Research object and publication", "distinction": "RO-Crate, DataCite and FAIR projections package or identify research outputs. They do not replace the hypothesis proposition, revision or evaluation semantics.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "NIST/SEMATECH Engineering Statistics Handbook", "organization": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "url": "https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/nistsematech-engineering-statistics-handbook", "version_or_date": "NIST Handbook 151, page accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Explains experimental design, statistical assumptions, hypothesis tests and interpretation." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Product and Process Comparisons: Introduction", "organization": "National Institute of Standards and Technology", "url": "https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section1/prc1.htm", "version_or_date": "NIST e-Handbook section accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Distinguishes hypothesis tests, confidence intervals and comparative questions." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "ISO 3534-1 Statistics vocabulary", "organization": "International Organization for Standardization", "url": "https://www.iso.org/standard/40145.html", "version_or_date": "ISO 3534-1:2006, revision pending", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines general statistical and probability terms and symbols." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "International Vocabulary of Metrology", "organization": "Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology", "url": "https://www.bipm.org/en/doi/10.59161/jcgm200-2012", "version_or_date": "JCGM 200:2012, VIM 3rd edition", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines measurement, quantity, result, uncertainty, calibration and metrological concepts." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement", "organization": "Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology", "url": "https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf", "version_or_date": "JCGM 100:2008", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines evaluation and expression of measurement uncertainty." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Protocol Registration Data Element Definitions", "organization": "United States National Library of Medicine", "url": "https://clinicaltrials.gov/policy/protocol-definitions", "version_or_date": "ClinicalTrials.gov definitions accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines study hypothesis summaries, objectives, interventions, outcomes and protocol metadata." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Results Data Element Definitions", "organization": "United States National Library of Medicine", "url": "https://clinicaltrials.gov/policy/results-definitions", "version_or_date": "ClinicalTrials.gov definitions updated 31 December 2024", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines outcome data, statistical tests, null hypotheses, estimates and result reporting." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "WHO Trial Registration Data Set", "organization": "World Health Organization", "url": "https://www.who.int/tools/clinical-trials-registry-platform/network/who-data-set", "version_or_date": "WHO TRDS version 1.3.1", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines minimum prospective trial identity, design, intervention and outcome registration data." }, { "id": "SRC-009", "title": "Create a Preregistration", "organization": "Center for Open Science", "url": "https://help.osf.io/article/158-create-a-preregistration", "version_or_date": "OSF guidance accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines time-stamped preregistration and frozen registration workflows." }, { "id": "SRC-010", "title": "Frascati Manual 2015", "organization": "Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development", "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/frascati-manual-2015_9789264239012-en.html", "version_or_date": "OECD Frascati Manual 2015", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines research and experimental development concepts and activity boundaries." }, { "id": "SRC-011", "title": "Recommendation on Open Science", "organization": "UNESCO", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-science", "version_or_date": "UNESCO Recommendation, 23 November 2021", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Frames open hypothesis formulation, methods, data, evaluation, scrutiny and reproducibility." }, { "id": "SRC-012", "title": "Ontology for Biomedical Investigations", "organization": "OBI Consortium", "url": "https://obi-ontology.org/", "version_or_date": "OBI production ontology accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines investigations, study designs, objectives, assays, data and analyses." }, { "id": "SRC-013", "title": "STATO: an Ontology of Statistical Methods", "organization": "STATO Consortium", "url": "https://stato-ontology.org/", "version_or_date": "STATO accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines statistical methods, estimates, tests and links to evaluated hypotheses." }, { "id": "SRC-014", "title": "Evidence and Conclusion Ontology", "organization": "ECO Consortium", "url": "https://evidenceontology.org/", "version_or_date": "ECO release 2025-06-23", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines evidence and assertion-method classes supporting scientific conclusions." }, { "id": "SRC-015", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation, 30 April 2013", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines entities, activities, agents, attribution, derivation, revision and invalidation." }, { "id": "SRC-016", "title": "Web Annotation Data Model", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation, 23 February 2017", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines body-target annotations, motivations, provenance and scoped selectors." }, { "id": "SRC-017", "title": "Data Quality Vocabulary", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/", "version_or_date": "W3C Working Group Note, 15 December 2016", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines quality measurements, annotations, policies and provenance." }, { "id": "SRC-018", "title": "ODRL Information Model 2.2", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation, 15 February 2018", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines permissions, prohibitions, duties and constraints for governed knowledge use." }, { "id": "SRC-019", "title": "Shapes Constraint Language", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation, 20 July 2017", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines declarative validation constraints and validation reports for RDF graphs." }, { "id": "SRC-020", "title": "DataCite Metadata Schema", "organization": "DataCite", "url": "https://schema.datacite.org/", "version_or_date": "DataCite Metadata Schema 4.7, 3 March 2026", "source_type": "schema", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines persistent research-resource metadata, versions, relations, funding and rights." }, { "id": "SRC-021", "title": "RO-Crate Specification", "organization": "RO-Crate Community", "url": "https://www.researchobject.org/ro-crate/specification.html", "version_or_date": "RO-Crate 1.3, current long-term release", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines portable research-object aggregation, contextual entities, provenance and profiles." }, { "id": "SRC-022", "title": "Schema.org Claim", "organization": "Schema.org Community Group", "url": "https://schema.org/Claim", "version_or_date": "Schema.org vocabulary accessed 2026-09-06", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines a claim as a fact-oriented assertion that can be reviewed or referenced." }, { "id": "SRC-023", "title": "RFC 3339 Date and Time on the Internet", "organization": "Internet Engineering Task Force", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html", "version_or_date": "RFC 3339, July 2002", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines timestamps with seconds and explicit numeric offsets or Z." }, { "id": "SRC-024", "title": "FAIR Guiding Principles", "organization": "Nature Scientific Data", "url": "https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618", "version_or_date": "Scientific Data 3, article 160018, 2016", "source_type": "scientific", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-09-06T21:46:00Z", "relevance": "Defines findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable research objects and metadata." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "hypothesis-identity-formulation-and-kind", "name": "Hypothesis identity, formulation and kind", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for hypothesis identity, formulation and kind.", "rationale": "Establish one provisional proposition and its semantic kind before evaluating it.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019" ], "layers": [ { "id": "identity-revision-and-related-concept-boundary", "name": "Identity, revision and related-concept boundary", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for identity, revision and related-concept boundary without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ], "findings": [ { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor", "name": "Hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor", "description": "Records hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ], "questions": [ { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor, and under which authority?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-data", "name": "Hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "hypothesis-identifier-namespace-version-revision-and-successor-artifact", "name": "Hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, revision and successor.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction", "name": "Hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction", "description": "Records hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ], "questions": [ { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction, and under which authority?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-data", "name": "Hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "hypothesis-question-assumption-prediction-theory-claim-objective-and-result-distinction-artifact", "name": "Hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, claim, objective and result distinction.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "expression-language-and-formalization", "name": "Expression, language and formalization", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for expression, language and formalization without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ], "findings": [ { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note", "name": "Natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note", "description": "Records natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ], "questions": [ { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note, and under which authority?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-data", "name": "Natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "natural-language-proposition-language-terms-and-scope-note-artifact", "name": "Natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting natural-language proposition, language, terms and scope note.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile", "name": "Formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile", "description": "Records formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ], "questions": [ { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile, and under which authority?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-data", "name": "Formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "formal-expression-variables-quantifiers-negation-relation-and-logic-profile-artifact", "name": "Formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting formal expression, variables, quantifiers, negation, relation and logic profile.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-scope-variables-and-conditions", "name": "Classification, scope, variables and conditions", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for classification, scope, variables and conditions.", "rationale": "Make the proposition type, universe of discourse and dependencies explicit.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-012" ], "layers": [ { "id": "hypothesis-type-and-test-profile", "name": "Hypothesis type and test profile", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for hypothesis type and test profile without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ], "findings": [ { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind", "name": "Scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind", "description": "Records scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind, and under which authority?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-data", "name": "Scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "scientific-statistical-causal-associational-descriptive-explanatory-and-predictive-kind-artifact", "name": "Scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting scientific, statistical, causal, associational, descriptive, explanatory and predictive kind.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile", "name": "Null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile", "description": "Records null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile, and under which authority?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-data", "name": "Null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "null-alternative-directional-equivalence-noninferiority-universal-and-existential-profile-artifact", "name": "Null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting null, alternative, directional, equivalence, noninferiority, universal and existential profile.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "population-variables-relations-and-boundary", "name": "Population, variables, relations and boundary", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for population, variables, relations and boundary without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "findings": [ { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion", "name": "Domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion", "description": "Records domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion, and under which authority?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-data", "name": "Domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "domain-population-unit-phenomenon-context-condition-and-exclusion-artifact", "name": "Domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting domain, population, unit, phenomenon, context, condition and exclusion.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator", "name": "Independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator", "description": "Records independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator, and under which authority?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-data", "name": "Independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "independent-dependent-exposure-outcome-comparator-confounder-covariate-and-mediator-artifact", "name": "Independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting independent, dependent, exposure, outcome, comparator, confounder, covariate and mediator.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-rationale-assumptions-and-prior-evidence", "name": "Provenance, rationale, assumptions and prior evidence", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for provenance, rationale, assumptions and prior evidence.", "rationale": "Preserve who proposed the hypothesis, why and on which qualified premises.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024", "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014" ], "layers": [ { "id": "authorship-motivation-and-rationale", "name": "Authorship, motivation and rationale", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for authorship, motivation and rationale without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ], "findings": [ { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority", "name": "Proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority", "description": "Records proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority, and under which authority?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-data", "name": "Proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "proposer-owner-contributor-source-time-and-authority-artifact", "name": "Proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting proposer, owner, contributor, source, time and authority.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use", "name": "Research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use", "description": "Records research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use, and under which authority?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-data", "name": "Research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "research-question-motivation-gap-mechanism-rationale-and-intended-use-artifact", "name": "Research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting research question, motivation, gap, mechanism, rationale and intended use.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "assumption-theory-prior-and-evidence-context", "name": "Assumption, theory, prior and evidence context", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for assumption, theory, prior and evidence context without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ], "findings": [ { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency", "name": "Background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency", "description": "Records background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency, and under which authority?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-data", "name": "Background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "background-theory-model-assumption-prior-belief-and-dependency-artifact", "name": "Background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting background theory, model, assumption, prior belief and dependency.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict", "name": "Prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict", "description": "Records prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict, and under which authority?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-data", "name": "Prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "prior-evidence-citation-support-challenge-gap-bias-and-conflict-artifact", "name": "Prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting prior evidence, citation, support, challenge, gap, bias and conflict.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalization-prediction-criteria-and-evaluation-design", "name": "Operationalization, prediction, criteria and evaluation design", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for operationalization, prediction, criteria and evaluation design.", "rationale": "Turn an abstract proposition into a predeclared evaluable contract.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ], "layers": [ { "id": "operational-definition-measure-and-prediction", "name": "Operational definition, measure and prediction", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for operational definition, measure and prediction without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "findings": [ { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit", "name": "Construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit", "description": "Records construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit, and under which authority?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-data", "name": "Construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "construct-indicator-operation-instrument-measure-estimand-and-unit-artifact", "name": "Construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting construct, indicator, operation, instrument, measure, estimand and unit.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier", "name": "Predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier", "description": "Records predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier, and under which authority?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-data", "name": "Predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "predicted-observation-effect-direction-range-timing-and-potential-falsifier-artifact", "name": "Predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting predicted observation, effect, direction, range, timing and potential falsifier.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "criterion-protocol-study-and-preregistration", "name": "Criterion, protocol, study and preregistration", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for criterion, protocol, study and preregistration without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "findings": [ { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule", "name": "Decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule", "description": "Records decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule, and under which authority?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-data", "name": "Decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "decision-threshold-error-rate-power-multiplicity-practical-significance-and-stop-rule-artifact", "name": "Decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting decision threshold, error rate, power, multiplicity, practical significance and stop rule.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation", "name": "Protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation", "description": "Records protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ], "questions": [ { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation, and under which authority?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-data", "name": "Protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "protocol-study-experiment-test-dataset-analysis-plan-registration-and-deviation-artifact", "name": "Protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting protocol, study, experiment, test, dataset, analysis plan, registration and deviation.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-evidence-uncertainty-and-lifecycle", "name": "Assessment, evidence, uncertainty and lifecycle", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for assessment, evidence, uncertainty and lifecycle.", "rationale": "Record source-qualified evaluations without replacing the hypothesis with a global truth flag.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-016", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ], "layers": [ { "id": "result-evidence-and-assessment", "name": "Result, evidence and assessment", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for result, evidence and assessment without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ], "findings": [ { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor", "name": "Observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and Bayes factor", "description": "Records observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor, and under which authority?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-data", "name": "Observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and Bayes factor data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "observation-result-estimate-effect-uncertainty-pvalue-confidence-and-bayes-factor-artifact", "name": "Observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and Bayes factor evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting observation, result, estimate, effect, uncertainty, p-value, confidence and bayes factor.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment", "name": "Support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment", "description": "Records support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ], "questions": [ { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment, and under which authority?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-data", "name": "Support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "support-challenge-refutation-corroboration-inconclusive-and-scope-qualified-assessment-artifact", "name": "Support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting support, challenge, refutation, corroboration, inconclusive and scope-qualified assessment.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-017" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "state-review-correction-and-evolution", "name": "State, review, correction and evolution", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for state, review, correction and evolution without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ], "findings": [ { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state", "name": "Proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state", "description": "Records proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state, and under which authority?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-data", "name": "Proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "proposed-preregistered-under-test-evaluated-supported-unsupported-refuted-and-withdrawn-state-artifact", "name": "Proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting proposed, preregistered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted and withdrawn state.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession", "name": "Review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession", "description": "Records review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession, and under which authority?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-data", "name": "Review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "review-dispute-correction-reformulation-split-merge-revision-and-supersession-artifact", "name": "Review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting review, dispute, correction, reformulation, split, merge, revision and supersession.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "governance-access-reuse-and-interoperability", "name": "Governance, access, reuse and interoperability", "description": "Groups the governed Resource Consumption concern for governance, access, reuse and interoperability.", "rationale": "Keep research ethics, disclosure, retention and projections explicit and loss-aware.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024", "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007", "SRC-010", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ], "layers": [ { "id": "roles-ethics-quality-access-and-retention", "name": "Roles, ethics, quality, access and retention", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for roles, ethics, quality, access and retention without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ], "findings": [ { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability", "name": "Owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability", "description": "Records owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability, and under which authority?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-data", "name": "Owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "owner-investigator-reviewer-steward-conflict-ethics-and-accountability-artifact", "name": "Owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting owner, investigator, reviewer, steward, conflict, ethics and accountability.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold", "name": "Consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold", "description": "Records consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold, and under which authority?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-data", "name": "Consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "consent-privacy-confidentiality-openness-license-access-retention-and-legal-hold-artifact", "name": "Consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting consent, privacy, confidentiality, openness, license, access, retention and legal hold.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011", "SRC-015", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-020", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "standards-crosswalk-conformance-and-loss", "name": "Standards crosswalk, conformance and loss", "description": "Groups Resource Consumption context for standards crosswalk, conformance and loss without importing neighboring master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ], "findings": [ { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk", "name": "NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate and FAIR crosswalk", "description": "Records nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk, and under which authority?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-data", "name": "NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate and FAIR crosswalk data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "nist-iso-jcgm-trial-obi-stato-eco-w3c-datacite-rocrate-and-fair-crosswalk-artifact", "name": "NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate and FAIR crosswalk evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting nist, iso, jcgm, trial, obi, stato, eco, w3c, datacite, ro-crate and fair crosswalk.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null }, { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss", "name": "Profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss", "description": "Records profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss as a source-qualified Hypothesis assertion while claims, assumptions, studies, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions retain external mastership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ], "questions": [ { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q01", "text": "Which identity, formulation, hypothesis kind, scope, variables, conditions and revision establish profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "hypothesis identifier, namespace, version, predecessor and lifecycle state", "natural-language and formal proposition, language, terms and logic profile", "kind, population, unit, variables, relationship, conditions, boundary and exclusions" ] }, { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q02", "text": "Who proposed, owns, operationalizes, evaluates, reviews, corrects or discloses profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss, and under which authority?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "proposer, owner, investigator, analyst, reviewer, steward and disclosure roles", "rationale, assumption, preregistration, protocol, deviation, assessment and correction authority", "source system, timestamp, conflict declaration, ethics, consent, access and retention basis" ] }, { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-q03", "text": "Which predictions, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, competing assessments, lineage and interoperability limits qualify profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "operational definition, predicted observation, potential falsifier and evaluation criteria", "study, test, dataset, result, evidence, effect, uncertainty and source-qualified assessment", "conflict, inconclusive state, correction, successor, profile mapping and semantic-loss declaration" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-data", "name": "Profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss data", "description": "Typed hypothesis-scoped values and references required to answer the governed questions for profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "profile-version-license-conformance-transformation-and-semantic-loss-artifact", "name": "Profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss evidence manifest", "description": "Digest-addressed manifest of propositions, operationalizations, sources, protocols, predictions, results, assessments, conflicts and corrections supporting profile, version, license, conformance, transformation and semantic loss.", "media_or_form": [ "application/json", "application/yaml", "text/markdown", "external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative hypothesis, registry or source-system record identifier first, otherwise governed IRI, then Dimension UUID or ULID; include immutable revision and digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "register-hypothesis", "name": "Register hypothesis", "description": "Create one stable provisional-proposition identity and initial revision.", "inputs": [ "proposition", "owner", "source" ], "outputs": [ "hypothesis identifier", "initial revision" ], "preconditions": [ "active Dimension", "create authority" ], "effects": [ "identity and explicit unknowns are appended" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-010", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-022", "SRC-023" ] }, { "id": "formulate-proposition", "name": "Formulate proposition", "description": "Record natural-language and optional formal expressions with terminology and logic profile.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "expressions", "language" ], "outputs": [ "versioned formulation" ], "preconditions": [ "terms and scope resolvable" ], "effects": [ "formulation history remains immutable" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-016", "SRC-019", "SRC-022" ] }, { "id": "classify-and-scope", "name": "Classify and scope hypothesis", "description": "Assign hypothesis kind, domain, population, unit, variables, conditions and exclusions.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "kind", "scope" ], "outputs": [ "typed scope profile" ], "preconditions": [ "classification authority" ], "effects": [ "kind and boundary are appended with source" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-013" ] }, { "id": "record-rationale", "name": "Record rationale and dependencies", "description": "Bind motivation, assumptions, theory, priors, citations and prior evidence as external references.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "rationale", "dependencies" ], "outputs": [ "rationale graph" ], "preconditions": [ "sources resolvable" ], "effects": [ "support and challenge remain independently qualified" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-011", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-024" ] }, { "id": "operationalize", "name": "Operationalize hypothesis", "description": "Define constructs, indicators, measures, estimands, predictions and potential falsifiers.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "operational definitions" ], "outputs": [ "evaluation contract" ], "preconditions": [ "measurement profile known" ], "effects": [ "abstract and operational terms remain linked but distinct" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-013" ] }, { "id": "preregister-evaluation", "name": "Preregister evaluation", "description": "Freeze protocol, outcomes, analysis criteria, timestamps and permitted deviations before results.", "inputs": [ "evaluation contract", "protocol", "registration authority" ], "outputs": [ "preregistration reference", "digest" ], "preconditions": [ "prospective timing verified" ], "effects": [ "registered plan and later deviations remain auditable" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-011" ] }, { "id": "bind-study-and-results", "name": "Bind study and results", "description": "Link external studies, tests, datasets, analyses, observations and results without importing their lifecycles.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "evaluation references" ], "outputs": [ "typed evaluation bindings" ], "preconditions": [ "external identities resolvable" ], "effects": [ "scope and provenance are appended" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-015" ] }, { "id": "record-assessment", "name": "Record assessment", "description": "Append one source-qualified support, challenge, refutation or inconclusive assessment with uncertainty.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "results", "assessment method" ], "outputs": [ "assessment assertion" ], "preconditions": [ "criteria and evidence known" ], "effects": [ "competing assessments remain visible" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-017" ] }, { "id": "revise-supersede", "name": "Revise or supersede", "description": "Create a corrected, reformulated, split, merged or successor hypothesis without overwriting history.", "inputs": [ "current revision", "reason", "replacement" ], "outputs": [ "successor revision", "difference trace" ], "preconditions": [ "revision authority" ], "effects": [ "prior proposition and assessments remain resolvable" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-015", "SRC-020", "SRC-021" ] }, { "id": "project-hypothesis", "name": "Project hypothesis view", "description": "Produce minimum-necessary standards-aligned views with declared semantic loss.", "inputs": [ "hypothesis revision", "target profile", "purpose" ], "outputs": [ "versioned projection", "semantic-loss declaration" ], "preconditions": [ "authorized recipient", "pinned target" ], "effects": [ "projection is logged and source identity preserved" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014", "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019", "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-023", "SRC-024" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-KNW-007 Claim / Proposition", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve the broader truth-apt proposition while the candidate parent relation remains under joint boundary review.", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-022" ] }, { "target": "WM-KNW-016 Assumption and research-question, theory, model and prediction masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve premises and conceptual context without conflating them with the hypothesis.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-010", "SRC-011", "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-015" ] }, { "target": "Study, protocol, experiment, test, dataset, observation, result, evidence and publication masters", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve evaluation design, execution and evidence while preserving external lifecycle authority.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-009", "SRC-012", "SRC-014", "SRC-020", "SRC-021" ] }, { "target": "NIST statistics, ISO 3534-1 and JCGM VIM and GUM", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project statistical-test, measurement and uncertainty semantics as pinned methods.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO trial registration", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project prospective health-study hypothesis, outcome, protocol and result views as domain profiles.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "OSF preregistration, OECD Frascati and UNESCO Open Science", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project registration, research-activity and transparent scientific-process context.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-009", "SRC-010", "SRC-011" ] }, { "target": "OBI, STATO and ECO", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project investigation, statistical-method, evidence and conclusion vocabulary with domain caveats.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-012", "SRC-013", "SRC-014" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O, Web Annotation, DQV, ODRL and SHACL", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project provenance, annotation, quality, access and graph-validation semantics.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-015", "SRC-016", "SRC-017", "SRC-018", "SRC-019" ] }, { "target": "DataCite 4.7, RO-Crate 1.3, Schema.org Claim and FAIR", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project research-resource identity, packaging, claim discovery and reuse metadata.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-020", "SRC-021", "SRC-022", "SRC-024" ] }, { "target": "RFC 3339", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Project unambiguous proposal, registration, evaluation, review and correction clocks.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-023" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Declare the Dimension owner, hypothesis steward, knowledge owners, investigators, measurement authorities, reviewers and accountable decision roles.", "Register authoritative claim, assumption, theory, question, study, protocol, dataset, observation, result, evidence, citation, publication and decision masters.", "Publish hypothesis-kind, lifecycle, relation, evidence, assessment, uncertainty, access, retention, ethics and interoperability registries.", "Pin discipline, statistical, measurement, trial, ethics, jurisdiction, privacy, licensing and exchange profiles." ], "namespace_guidance": "Mint hypothesis, revision, operationalization, assessment and projection identifiers only in the adopting Dimension namespace; preserve claim, assumption, theory, study, protocol, data, result, evidence, publication and decision identities as typed external references.", "registry_links": [ "https://ver.cy/models/", "https://ver.cy/model-agent-protocol.md", "Dimension-local hypothesis, relation, assessment, evidence, access, retention and provenance registries" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Canonicalize by registry ID, model version, authoritative source identity, hypothesis kind, proposition revision, scope, owner and source profile; never use title, text hash, date or publication alone as identity.", "Keep hypothesis, question, assumption, prediction, theory, model, objective, requirement, generic claim, study, test, result, evidence, interpretation and decision distinct." ], "patch_rules": [ "Additive extensions use a Dimension-owned namespace and declare target node, discipline profile, authority, source, rationale, access, time and interoperability impact.", "Breaking changes require a new version, migration and crosswalk maps, compatibility declaration and continued resolution of prior hypothesis revisions and assessments." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Consumers may ignore unknown additive fields only when identity, proposition, kind, scope, operationalization, criteria, state, provenance and access meaning remain intact.", "NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial-registry, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate, Schema.org and FAIR mappings pin source and target versions and declare transformed, omitted or non-round-trippable values." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier for the hypothesis and immutable proposition revision.", "Governed globally resolvable hypothesis or registration IRI.", "Adopting-Dimension UUID or ULID when no authoritative external identifier exists." ], "timestamp_rule": "Record event timestamps in RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit UTC offset or Z; keep proposal, registration, protocol, study, observation, analysis, assessment, review, correction and ingestion times distinct.", "serial_naming_rule": "Name serial artifacts as {hypothesis-id}--{artifact-kind}--{revision-or-assessment-id}; never use a date, title, author, p-value, filename or hash alone as identity.", "integrity_rule": "Store digest, media type, byte length, issuer, source and vocabulary versions, proposition and evaluation scope, clocks, provenance, uncertainty, assurance, license and access marking for each retained serial artifact." }, "policies": [ "The adopting Dimension declares who may propose, formulate, classify, operationalize, preregister, evaluate, review, revise, disclose, retain and tombstone hypotheses.", "Every assertion requires hypothesis identity and revision, kind, proposition, scope, source, authority, state, evidence, uncertainty and lineage as applicable.", "Agents never infer global truth, causality, practical significance, safety, compliance or decision authority from a p-value, interval, Bayes factor, citation count, peer review, result or status alone.", "Claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, tests, data, observations, results, evidence, publications and decisions remain external masters.", "Automated agents may append low-risk formulations, links, validations and projections under delegation, but human-subject decisions, protected disclosure, publication claims and irreversible deletion require accountable authority." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve active Dimension, purpose, role, requested revision, hypothesis kind, scope, evaluation horizon, assurance, freshness, license and access policy; return the minimum permitted projection." ], "create": [ "Create stable identity, kind, proposition, scope, owner, source and explicit unknowns before adding evaluation or truth-related assertions." ], "update": [ "Append an immutable formulation, scope, operationalization, registration, assessment, review or correction revision with actor, authority, reason, RFC 3339 effective time and predecessor." ], "delete": [ "Apply ethics, privacy, dispute, audit, retention and legal-hold policy; tombstone eligible Hypothesis-owned records or withdraw projections while preserving identity, material provenance and non-cascading external references." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Dimension owner", "responsibilities": [ "Own namespace, mastership, delegation, access, retention and federation rules." ] }, { "name": "Hypothesis steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own hypothesis identity, kind, formulation, lifecycle and revision policy." ] }, { "name": "Proposer or investigator", "responsibilities": [ "Own formulation, rationale, assumptions, scope and declared conflicts." ] }, { "name": "Method or measurement steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own operational definitions, measures, instruments, protocols and quality assertions." ] }, { "name": "Analyst or evaluator", "responsibilities": [ "Own analysis method, result interpretation, uncertainty and assessment assertion." ] }, { "name": "Independent reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Review scope, preregistration, deviations, evidence, bias, conflicts and corrections without rewriting originals." ] }, { "name": "Ethics or data steward", "responsibilities": [ "Own consent, privacy, confidentiality, data use and retention constraints." ] }, { "name": "Disclosure authority", "responsibilities": [ "Approve recipient, purpose, redaction, publication claim and timing." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny mutation and sensitive disclosure unless active Dimension, role, purpose, research sensitivity, consent, license and field policy grant the action; expose the minimum necessary projection.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Emergency or legally compelled access must be grounded, time-limited, purpose-bound, attributable, independently reviewed and unable to erase immutable hypothesis, assessment, correction or legal-hold evidence." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Log actor, role, purpose, hypothesis and revision identity, action, decision, policy and vocabulary versions, RFC 3339 timestamp with offset, affected fields, source evidence and outcome for privileged mutation or disclosure." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Read the nearest Dimension-owner AGENTS.md, hypothesis and evidence authorities, active discipline, ethics, jurisdiction, time, access, retention and licensing policies.", "Read this model AGENTS.md, pinned spec.yaml and required claim, assumption, theory, study, protocol, data, result, evidence, publication and decision instructions before mutation." ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "WM-KNW-009 covers a versioned provisional Hypothesis with identity, formulation, kind, scope, variables, rationale, assumptions, operationalization, predictions, criteria, preregistration, evaluation bindings, source-qualified assessments, uncertainty, lifecycle, governance and loss-aware interoperability. Discipline, statistical, causal, ethics, jurisdiction and independent-review questions remain deferred.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Hypothesis, formulation revision, registration, assessment and successor identities remain distinct." }, { "dimension": "classification and definition", "status": "covered", "notes": "Scientific, statistical, causal, descriptive, predictive, null, alternative and other profiles are explicit." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposition, language, logic, scope, variables, conditions, predictions, criteria and state are covered." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Operational definitions, measures, observations, results and assessments remain independently identified." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposed, registered, under-test, evaluated, supported, unsupported, refuted, inconclusive, revised and withdrawn states preserve history." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Questions, assumptions, theories, studies, protocols, data, results, evidence, publications and decisions use typed references." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposal, registration, protocol, study, observation, analysis, assessment, review and correction clocks remain distinct." }, { "dimension": "spatial", "status": "covered", "notes": "Population, setting, jurisdiction, study location and applicability region are explicit when relevant." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Proposers, sources, rationale, methods, registrations, deviations, results, reviews and revisions are linked." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Intellectual contribution, record stewardship, data ownership and decision authority are not conflated." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Identity, formulation, scope, operationalization, criteria, evidence, uncertainty, lineage and crosswalk checks are explicit." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Role, purpose, consent, confidentiality, openness, minimum projection and audit are represented." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Corrections, disputes, retractions, audit or legal hold, withdrawal and tombstones are non-cascading." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "covered", "notes": "Statistical, trial, ontology, research-object, provenance and metadata mappings disclose loss." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and possible actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Registration, formulation, scoping, operationalization, preregistration, evaluation, assessment, revision and projection declare controlled effects." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Discipline, study-design, statistical, Bayesian, causal-inference, machine-learning, ethics, jurisdiction, privacy, licensing and retention profiles require expert review.", "Claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, protocols, tests, datasets, observations, results, evidence, publications and decisions remain neighboring masters.", "Automated experiment design, causal identification, power calculation, model selection, evidence grading, replication scoring and truth adjudication remain future work." ], "conflicts": [ "Scientific disciplines use hypothesis, proposition, conjecture, model and prediction differently; the model requires explicit kind and profile.", "Null-hypothesis significance testing, confidence intervals, Bayesian evidence, likelihood and qualitative corroboration cannot share one universal acceptance rule.", "Supported, not rejected, corroborated, replicated, practically important, causal and true are different governed assessments." ], "regional_assumptions": [ "ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO are health-research profiles rather than universal hypothesis registries.", "OBI, STATO and ECO are strong scientific ontologies with biomedical roots and do not define all disciplinary practice.", "Ethics, consent, ownership, publication, retention and legal consequences depend on discipline, institution and jurisdiction." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Reject a hypothesis without stable identity, revision, proposition, kind, scope, source, owner and lineage.", "Reject a question, assumption, theory, prediction, objective, requirement, study, result, evidence or decision represented as the hypothesis itself.", "Reject a statistical assessment without method, estimand, data scope, criteria, uncertainty and multiplicity context.", "Reject non-rejection of a null as proof of the null or statistical significance as practical importance, causality or truth.", "Reject preregistration inferred after results or deviations erased from history.", "Reject last-write-wins when studies or reviewers disagree; preserve source-qualified assessments and uncertainty.", "Reject protected disclosure, research participation, publication claims or record destruction outside delegated authority." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "The root is a persistent versioned proposition with its own identity and evaluation contract. Studies and assessments occur around it but do not turn the proposition itself into an event." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Hypothesis entity boundary", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The model owns a provisional proposition and evaluation contract rather than study execution or a global truth judgment." }, { "concept": "WM-KNW-007 parent signal", "disposition": "held-as-reference", "rationale": "Hypothesis specializes an evaluable provisional proposition, but the canonical inheritance relation requires joint review." }, { "concept": "Related knowledge objects", "disposition": "kept-distinct", "rationale": "Research question, assumption, prediction, theory, model, objective, requirement and generic claim remain independently identified." }, { "concept": "Statistical hypothesis profiles", "disposition": "accepted-as-non-universal-profiles", "rationale": "Null, alternative, directional, equivalence and noninferiority structures apply only where the evaluation method declares them." }, { "concept": "Operationalization and falsifiability", "disposition": "accepted-with-method-lineage", "rationale": "Constructs, measures, estimands, predictions and potential falsifiers require explicit scope and source." }, { "concept": "Preregistration", "disposition": "accepted-with-temporal-integrity", "rationale": "The frozen prospective plan, amendments and post-registration deviations remain independently time-stamped." }, { "concept": "Evidence and assessment", "disposition": "accepted-as-source-qualified", "rationale": "Studies and evidence support, challenge, refute or leave a hypothesis inconclusive through explicit criteria and uncertainty." }, { "concept": "Truth and decision boundary", "disposition": "kept-external", "rationale": "P-values, intervals, Bayes factors, peer review, citation counts and authority do not create a context-free truth or policy decision." }, { "concept": "Automated operation boundary", "disposition": "accepted-with-delegation", "rationale": "Agents may append low-risk formulations and validations but not perform protected research, publication claims or destructive actions without authority." }, { "concept": "Provider waiver and local no-tools audit", "disposition": "accepted-with-mandatory-hold", "rationale": "One bounded Claude Sonnet attempt timed out and one bounded Grok attempt failed with stderr suppressed and hashed. Codex separately audits the frozen validated result and comparison without acquiring new facts, so assurance remains reviewable-draft." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Absence-of-external-review hold: one Claude Sonnet attempt timed out and one Grok attempt failed before producing an admissible result; no external result was admitted.", "Relation hold: WM-KNW-007 remains a reference rather than an approved parent until joint boundary review.", "Boundary hold: claims, assumptions, theories, questions, studies, protocols, tests, data, observations, results, evidence, publications and decisions remain external masters.", "Profile hold: scientific, statistical, causal, qualitative, engineering, clinical, social-science and machine-learning hypotheses require discipline-specific semantics.", "Inference hold: rejection, non-rejection, support, corroboration, refutation, replication, practical importance, causality and truth remain distinct assessments.", "Method hold: statistical and Bayesian measures require declared estimand, assumptions, analysis, uncertainty, multiplicity and decision criteria.", "Preregistration hold: prospective registration, amendments, deviations and later results require verified clocks and immutable lineage.", "Ethics hold: human-subject, sensitive-data, dual-use, privacy, consent, publication and jurisdictional rules require accountable review.", "Interoperability hold: NIST, ISO, JCGM, trial, OBI, STATO, ECO, W3C, DataCite, RO-Crate, Schema.org and FAIR projections require exact release pins, conformance tests and semantic-loss declarations.", "Completeness hold: the 24-source draft is broad but does not claim universal disciplinary, philosophical, statistical, ethical, legal or operational coverage.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [] }, "statistics": { "sources": 24, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 24, "questions": 72, "artifacts": 24, "functions": 10 } }