# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T15:14:10Z", "synthesisSha256": "79715413a750fd8008739750065acb82956ab6f26e33c943b911fb8f913e7fbe", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-MED-001", "registryId": "vr.wm-med-001", "name": "Creative Work", "version": "0.3.0-draft", "previousVersions": [ { "version": "0.2.0-legacy", "url": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/blob/feat/mega-model-registry/models/knowledge-information/N5-media-and-creative-work.md" } ], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "INF.MED.WRK" ], "tags": [ "creative", "work", "inf.med.wrk" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-med-001-creative-work/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-med-001", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-med-001", "model_id": "WM-MED-001", "name": "Creative Work", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Describe one intellectual or artistic work across its realizations, keeping the work distinct from media assets, editions, copies, rights and publication events.", "scope_statement": "One governed work identity and its descriptive assertions. Work-local expression descriptors and typed links to embodiments retain WEMI distinctions inside the context; referenced media, publication, legal and event records keep their own masters. All operations below are proposed local metadata operations, not implemented services.", "in_scope": [ "Work identity, recognition evidence, names and descriptive classification", "Work-local realization descriptors, representative characteristics and embodiment references", "Contribution and provenance claims with uncertainty and scoped evidence", "Part, aggregation, derivation and related-work links", "References to scoped rights assertions, reuse decisions and external availability events", "Catalogue lifecycle, correction history and documented vocabulary mappings" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Media bytes, transcoding, preservation execution, copy custody and rendition lifecycle", "Publication/edition production, release execution, performance scheduling and distribution transactions", "Copyright adjudication, licensing, rights transfer, royalty calculation and access-control enforcement", "Person and organization master data, language vocabulary governance and full provenance credential verification", "Scholarly peer review, scholarly-publication lifecycle and software execution semantics" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "Registry and legacy N5", "distinction": "standalone-mm is a registry record-plane classification; entity describes this subject. The WEMI flag is reconciled by internal typed context and links, not by taking ownership of every manifestation or item. Legacy conformance claims are not inherited.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MED-002 Media Asset / Rendition; WM-MED-004 Audio / Video Recording", "distinction": "A work can be linked to many assets and recordings. Byte equality and ISRC equality do not establish abstract work identity; technical assets and recordings retain separate masters.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MED-003 Publication / Edition; WM-REC-001 Document / Record", "distinction": "Only embodiment and evidence references live here. Editions may embody multiple expressions; unpublished embodiments are not excluded. Record retention and publication operations belong to the referenced owners.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-KNW-003 Intellectual Property Right", "distinction": "Rights references and uncertain assertions do not grant permission. Authorship, metadata stewardship and rights holding differ; copyright is not restricted to registered rights.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-PER-001 Person; WM-ORG-001 Organization; WM-KNW-002 Language / Terminology", "distinction": "Contributor, collective and language references carry work-specific roles or labels without copying their master lifecycles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-REC-004 Scholarly Publication; WM-MED-008 Content Provenance Credential", "distinction": "Legacy split gives scholarly publication its own model. This root may link to it and to provenance credentials without owning review, credential verification or truth certification.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "neighbor": "IFLA LRM, BIBFRAME and Schema.org", "distinction": "These are contextual alignments, not interchangeable identity schemes. An LRM expression can require a separate BIBFRAME Work; a broad CreativeWork type alone cannot establish the abstraction level.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "IFLA Library Reference Model", "organization": "International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions", "url": "https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712.pdf", "version_or_date": "2017-12 edition; later revisions not verified", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 5.7: distinct work, expression, manifestation and item; identity and aggregation boundaries." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "CreativeWork", "organization": "Schema.org community", "url": "https://schema.org/CreativeWork", "version_or_date": "Development page accessed 2026-10-06; release not pinned", "source_type": "schema", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Discovery properties and links for descriptions, contributors, lifecycle, media, accessibility and related works; not an exact LRM Work class." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "DCMI Metadata Terms", "organization": "Dublin Core Metadata Initiative", "url": "https://www.dublincore.org/specifications/dublin-core/dcmi-terms/", "version_or_date": "2020-01-20 identifier shown on live page", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Identifier, title, subject, language, creator, relation, rights, provenance and temporal description terms." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Entity, activity, agent, attribution, derivation and revision distinctions for proposed evidence links." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "ODRL Information Model 2.2", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 2018-02-15", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Policy targets, parties, permissions, prohibitions, duties and constraints; references here do not implement policy evaluation." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model", "organization": "Library of Congress", "url": "https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html", "version_or_date": "2016-04-21; official indexed text only in this run", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "Work, Instance and Item mapping differs from LRM; translation can be represented by a Work-to-Work link." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "Frequently Asked Questions: Copyright", "organization": "World Intellectual Property Organization", "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/copyright/faq-copyright", "version_or_date": "Undated guidance accessed 2026-10-06; national law not verified", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "General distinctions among protected expression, authorship, economic and moral rights, and registration; no jurisdiction-specific legal determination." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "International Standard Recording Code - Home", "organization": "International Federation of the Phonographic Industry", "url": "https://isrc.ifpi.org/", "version_or_date": "Undated registration-authority guidance accessed 2026-10-06", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:11:29Z", "relevance": "ISRC identifies recordings and music videos, not musical compositions, products or performers; used to reject a legacy identifier collapse." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "b-identity", "name": "Identity and description", "description": "Work-scoped identity and description.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-recognition", "name": "Work recognition", "description": "Record the rationale that one conceptual work is being described. Keep competing identifications unresolved rather than merging on title, topic, file digest or a recording identifier.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-work-recognition", "name": "Identity decision", "description": "Record the rationale that one conceptual work is being described. Keep competing identifications unresolved rather than merging on title, topic, file digest or a recording identifier.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-work-recognition-q01", "text": "Which master work identifier and identifier scheme identify this work?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "work-identifier" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-q02", "text": "What observed realization or historical evidence supports recognizing this work?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "recognition-evidence" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-q03", "text": "What distinguishes this work from a similarly titled or thematically similar work?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "identity-rationale" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-q04", "text": "How is a disputed duplicate or mistaken work merge represented and reversed?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "identity-dispute" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-work-recognition-d01", "name": "work-identifier", "description": "Master authority, scheme, value and status; one local work identifier is required. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-d02", "name": "recognition-evidence", "description": "Realization references, observations, evidence locators and confidence; missing evidence is explicit. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-d03", "name": "identity-rationale", "description": "Comparison candidates and the adopted boundary rule; title similarity is insufficient. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "text", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-work-recognition-d04", "name": "identity-dispute", "description": "Claimants, competing identifiers, review state and reversible alias or split decision. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-work-recognition-a01", "name": "Identity decision evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for identity decision, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-description", "name": "Descriptive context", "description": "Maintain language-tagged names, work type, subjects and descriptions as attributed assertions. Descriptive places and times are not automatically the place or time of creation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-work-description", "name": "Titles and context", "description": "Maintain language-tagged names, work type, subjects and descriptions as attributed assertions. Descriptive places and times are not automatically the place or time of creation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-work-description-q01", "text": "Which work type and genre vocabulary were applied, with which version?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "classification" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-q02", "text": "Which preferred, alternative and translated titles name the work in each context?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "titles" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-q03", "text": "Which depicted places and periods are distinguished from the place and time of creation?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "subject-context" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-q04", "text": "What description or audience claim is supported, disputed or intentionally absent?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "description-claims" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-work-description-d01", "name": "classification", "description": "Type or genre code, vocabulary version, assigner and confidence. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-d02", "name": "titles", "description": "Title text, language, script, preferred context and source. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-d03", "name": "subject-context", "description": "Subject references and typed spatial or temporal coverage with uncertainty. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-work-description-d04", "name": "description-claims", "description": "Attributed synopsis, intended audience and contested assertions without inferred truth. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-work-description-a01", "name": "Titles and context evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for titles and context, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-realizations", "name": "Realizations and embodiments", "description": "Work-scoped realizations and embodiments.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-expression", "name": "Expression context", "description": "Use work-local expression descriptors with independent expression identifiers. A translation, arrangement or revision is classified by an explicit profile; transformative changes may require a related work. A work record can have unknown realization details without asserting an unrealized idea is an LRM work.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-expression-context", "name": "Realization distinction", "description": "Use work-local expression descriptors with independent expression identifiers. A translation, arrangement or revision is classified by an explicit profile; transformative changes may require a related work. A work record can have unknown realization details without asserting an unrealized idea is an LRM work.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-expression-context-q01", "text": "Which identified expression realizes this work under the selected cataloguing profile?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "expression-bindings" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-q02", "text": "Which language, signs or performance form distinguish each realization?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "realization-characteristics" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-q03", "text": "When does the documented change require a new expression or a separate derived work?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "change-boundary" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-q04", "text": "Which representative expression characteristics may be displayed at work level?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "representative-characteristics" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-expression-context-d01", "name": "expression-bindings", "description": "Expression ID, work reference, external master if present and applicable profile. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-d02", "name": "realization-characteristics", "description": "Language references, form, relevant version and source; no universal original-language assumption. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-d03", "name": "change-boundary", "description": "Profile rule, compared realizations, decision author and rationale. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-expression-context-d04", "name": "representative-characteristics", "description": "Selected expression, selection basis and scope; preserve alternatives and avoid false universality. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-expression-context-a01", "name": "Realization distinction evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for realization distinction, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-embodiment", "name": "Embodiment references", "description": "Describe typed embodiment relationships while retaining external edition, asset, recording and copy identities. A single publication can carry expressions of multiple works; a recording identifier is not a file identifier or a universal work key.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-embodiment-links", "name": "Manifestations and assets", "description": "Describe typed embodiment relationships while retaining external edition, asset, recording and copy identities. A single publication can carry expressions of multiple works; a recording identifier is not a file identifier or a universal work key.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-embodiment-links-q01", "text": "Which manifestations embody which expressions of this work, including unpublished embodiments?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "embodiment-map" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-q02", "text": "Which identifiers refer to a recording, edition, copy or digital rendition rather than this work?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "typed-identifiers" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-q03", "text": "Which extent or accessibility observation belongs to a specific realization or asset?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "asset-observations" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-q04", "text": "Which authorized catalogue links expose usable embodiments without exposing restricted payloads?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "embodiment-access" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-embodiment-links-d01", "name": "embodiment-map", "description": "Expression and manifestation references with many-to-many bindings and evidence. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-d02", "name": "typed-identifiers", "description": "Identifier scheme, target entity level, resolver and disputed assignment state. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-d03", "name": "asset-observations", "description": "Target reference, measure and unit where applicable, method, observation time and limitation. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "f-embodiment-links-d04", "name": "embodiment-access", "description": "Public locator or restricted resolver, authorized view and stale-link state; payload access is delegated. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-embodiment-links-a01", "name": "Manifestations and assets evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for manifestations and assets, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-contribution", "name": "Contributions and evidence", "description": "Work-scoped contributions and evidence.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-credit", "name": "Attribution", "description": "Record evidence-qualified credit at the correct work or expression level. Anonymous, pseudonymous, collective and contested credit can be represented without inventing an identified natural person or inferring rights shares from roles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-contribution-claims", "name": "Contributor roles", "description": "Record evidence-qualified credit at the correct work or expression level. Anonymous, pseudonymous, collective and contested credit can be represented without inventing an identified natural person or inferring rights shares from roles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-contribution-claims-q01", "text": "Who is credited for which work or expression contribution and under which role vocabulary?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "contributions" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-q02", "text": "What source supports or challenges each attribution and credit wording?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "attribution-evidence" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-q03", "text": "How is contributor credit separated from legal ownership and catalogue stewardship?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "role-separation" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-q04", "text": "Which identity details must be withheld while preserving a legitimate public credit?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "credit-disclosure" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-contribution-claims-d01", "name": "contributions", "description": "Agent reference or unknown/pseudonymous designation, role code, target and vocabulary version. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-d02", "name": "attribution-evidence", "description": "Claim ID, evidence reference, status, supplied credit text and contradictory evidence. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-d03", "name": "role-separation", "description": "Distinct contributor, claimed rights-holder and metadata steward references with authority basis. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-contribution-claims-d04", "name": "credit-disclosure", "description": "Permitted display identity, disclosure basis, restriction and reviewer without exposing private identity. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-contribution-claims-a01", "name": "Contributor roles evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for contributor roles, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-provenance", "name": "Provenance assertions", "description": "Attach sources to descriptive claims and distinguish creation activities from metadata ingestion. Human, assisted, automated or unknown generation assertions remain evidence-qualified; credentials and digests are not proof of truth, authorship or copyright eligibility.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-provenance-claims", "name": "Evidence and generation context", "description": "Attach sources to descriptive claims and distinguish creation activities from metadata ingestion. Human, assisted, automated or unknown generation assertions remain evidence-qualified; credentials and digests are not proof of truth, authorship or copyright eligibility.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-provenance-claims-q01", "text": "Which agent and activity produced the work description or supplied a particular claim?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "claim-lineage" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-q02", "text": "Which creation, modification and ingestion times are known with what precision?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "claim-times" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-q03", "text": "What supports the declared human, assisted, automated or unknown origin of a realization?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "origin-evidence" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-q04", "text": "How are contradictory or withdrawn provenance assertions preserved for review?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "provenance-review" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-provenance-claims-d01", "name": "claim-lineage", "description": "Claim ID, responsible agent, activity reference, source and provenance chain. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-d02", "name": "claim-times", "description": "Typed time or interval, precision, uncertainty and observation time; do not invent midnight timestamps. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-d03", "name": "origin-evidence", "description": "Origin assertion, target realization, evidence or credential reference and verification limitation. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-provenance-claims-d04", "name": "provenance-review", "description": "Competing assertions, review status, supersession and lawful redaction or disposition rule. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-provenance-claims-a01", "name": "Evidence and generation context evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for evidence and generation context, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-relations", "name": "Work relationships", "description": "Work-scoped work relationships.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-derivation", "name": "Derivation and reference", "description": "Keep adaptation, translation, sequel, quotation, reference and equivalence claims distinct. Direction, target level and evidence are explicit; an undifferentiated related-work link does not establish identity or permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-work-relations", "name": "Typed related works", "description": "Keep adaptation, translation, sequel, quotation, reference and equivalence claims distinct. Direction, target level and evidence are explicit; an undifferentiated related-work link does not establish identity or permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-work-relations-q01", "text": "Which related work is the source, successor or referenced subject of this relationship?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "work-links" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-q02", "text": "Which profile distinguishes adaptation, expression derivation and mere citation?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "relation-profile" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-q03", "text": "What prevents unsupported equivalence or impossible part-cycle assertions?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "relation-validation" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-q04", "text": "Who approved the relation claim and what remains contested?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "relation-authority" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-work-relations-d01", "name": "work-links", "description": "Source and target identifiers, direction, typed predicate and claim evidence. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-d02", "name": "relation-profile", "description": "Pinned profile plus mapping rationale and unresolved classification. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-d03", "name": "relation-validation", "description": "Predicate-specific constraints, cycle exceptions, unresolved references and review results. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-work-relations-d04", "name": "relation-authority", "description": "Authorized descriptive steward, decision basis, dissent and review time; no legal clearance implied. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-work-relations-a01", "name": "Typed related works evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for typed related works, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-aggregation", "name": "Parts and aggregating works", "description": "Distinguish a work with parts from an aggregating work that provides selection or arrangement. Co-publication does not make all component works parts of one intellectual creation or transfer their ownership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-aggregation-context", "name": "Assembly intent", "description": "Distinguish a work with parts from an aggregating work that provides selection or arrangement. Co-publication does not make all component works parts of one intellectual creation or transfer their ownership.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-aggregation-context-q01", "text": "What selection or ordering plan identifies an aggregating work independently of its contents?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "aggregation-plan" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-q02", "text": "Which component references describe work parts versus expressions gathered in a manifestation?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "component-links" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-q03", "text": "How are changes to an evolving collection or serial distinguished from a new work?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "continuation-rule" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-q04", "text": "How are omitted, repeated or independently governed components represented?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "component-exceptions" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-aggregation-context-d01", "name": "aggregation-plan", "description": "Assembly intent, scope, order rationale and identified aggregating work. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-d02", "name": "component-links", "description": "Target type, relation, position, optionality and source; no containment inferred from packaging. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-d03", "name": "continuation-rule", "description": "Profile and successor relation, observed change, uncertain boundary and curator decision. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "f-aggregation-context-d04", "name": "component-exceptions", "description": "Component reference, occurrence identity, omission reason and external authority; no forced completeness. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-aggregation-context-a01", "name": "Assembly intent evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for assembly intent, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-rights", "name": "Rights context and reuse", "description": "Work-scoped rights context and reuse.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-claims", "name": "Rights assertions", "description": "Carry references to rights assertions at the work, expression or embodiment level. Unknown, disputed and time-limited claims remain distinct; national applicability and underlying legal records are delegated.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-rights-context", "name": "Scoped rights evidence", "description": "Carry references to rights assertions at the work, expression or embodiment level. Unknown, disputed and time-limited claims remain distinct; national applicability and underlying legal records are delegated.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-rights-context-q01", "text": "Which party claims which right over which precisely identified target?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "rights-assertions" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-q02", "text": "For which territory, term and observation date is each rights assertion reported?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "rights-scope" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-q03", "text": "What evidence supports public-domain or licence claims for the proposed target and territory?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "rights-evidence" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-q04", "text": "How are conflicting claims, orphan status or incomplete ownership chains exposed?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "rights-disputes" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-rights-context-d01", "name": "rights-assertions", "description": "Claim ID, rights-record reference, target level, asserted holder and claim status. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-d02", "name": "rights-scope", "description": "Jurisdiction or territory, effective interval, observation time and unknown scope indicators. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-d03", "name": "rights-evidence", "description": "Evidence reference, legal-profile reviewer and qualification; registration absence is not clearance. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-rights-context-d04", "name": "rights-disputes", "description": "Contradictory references, unresolved party, affected scope and escalation state; no automatic denial of all lawful uses. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-rights-context-a01", "name": "Scoped rights evidence evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for scoped rights evidence, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-reuse", "name": "Reuse decision references", "description": "Store the context and result reference of an external reuse decision. Descriptive rights metadata, a licence offer or public availability never substitutes for a qualified permission assessment or another applicable legal basis.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-reuse-context", "name": "Permission context", "description": "Store the context and result reference of an external reuse decision. Descriptive rights metadata, a licence offer or public availability never substitutes for a qualified permission assessment or another applicable legal basis.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-reuse-context-q01", "text": "What intended use, target and audience are submitted for external clearance review?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "reuse-request" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-q02", "text": "Which authoritative decision or policy reference supports the reported reuse status?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "reuse-decision" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-q03", "text": "Which attribution, restriction or duty references apply to that reported decision?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "reuse-conditions" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-q04", "text": "Which rights information can appear in a public catalogue versus a restricted review view?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "rights-view" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-reuse-context-d01", "name": "reuse-request", "description": "Action, target version, territory, audience and purpose; minimum necessary information only. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-d02", "name": "reuse-decision", "description": "External decision ID, deciding authority, version, validity interval and unresolved prerequisites. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-d03", "name": "reuse-conditions", "description": "Policy or contract reference and scoped condition summary; enforcement remains external. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "f-reuse-context-d04", "name": "rights-view", "description": "Field-level disclosure rules, embargoes, reviewer role and redaction rationale. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-reuse-context-a01", "name": "Permission context evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for permission context, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-stewardship", "name": "Catalogue continuity and exchange", "description": "Work-scoped catalogue continuity and exchange.", "rationale": "Group related descriptive decisions while retaining separate authorities and explicit evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "l-continuity", "name": "Lifecycle context", "description": "Separate the state of the catalogue record from reported creative progress and from release or performance events. Withdrawal of availability does not erase the historical work; physical properties belong to embodiments.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity", "name": "Status and event references", "description": "Separate the state of the catalogue record from reported creative progress and from release or performance events. Withdrawal of availability does not erase the historical work; physical properties belong to embodiments.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-q01", "text": "Which status describes this catalogue record and which describes reported creative progress?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "status-claims" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-q02", "text": "Which release, performance or exhibition record evidences a dated public occurrence?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "occurrence-links" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-q03", "text": "Which revision, correction or withdrawal changes the description without changing work identity?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "catalogue-revision" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-q04", "text": "Which policy controls retention, lawful erasure and minimal tombstones for this work record?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "disposition-context" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-d01", "name": "status-claims", "description": "Typed status, vocabulary, target, evidence and uncertain or incomplete states. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-d02", "name": "occurrence-links", "description": "Event master reference, expression or embodiment target, place, time and evidence; no event execution. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-d03", "name": "catalogue-revision", "description": "Expected revision, change reason, superseded assertion, authorizer and availability qualification. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-d04", "name": "disposition-context", "description": "Adopting Dimension policy reference, scope, hold, disposition authorization and minimal continuity evidence. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-catalogue-continuity-a01", "name": "Status and event references evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for status and event references, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "l-exchange", "name": "Interoperability and quality", "description": "Version mappings rather than assuming that every vocabulary describes the same abstraction level. Emit information-loss and unresolved-reference reports; no executable mapping, runtime implementation or conformance certificate is claimed.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "f-mapping-context", "name": "Profile-qualified exchange", "description": "Version mappings rather than assuming that every vocabulary describes the same abstraction level. Emit information-loss and unresolved-reference reports; no executable mapping, runtime implementation or conformance certificate is claimed.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "f-mapping-context-q01", "text": "Which pinned vocabulary profile maps this work and its expression context into the target system?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "mapping-profile" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-q02", "text": "Which distinctions or uncertain claims are lost or reinterpreted by a proposed projection?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "mapping-loss" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-q03", "text": "Which required references and evidence remain unresolved before a catalogue export?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "quality-report" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-q04", "text": "Which export view prevents restricted evidence from leaking through nested references?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "export-scope" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "f-mapping-context-d01", "name": "mapping-profile", "description": "Profile ID, source and target versions, responsible steward and abstraction-level rules. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-d02", "name": "mapping-loss", "description": "Field or relation path, loss type, original assertion and acceptance or refusal rule. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-d03", "name": "quality-report", "description": "Profile checks, unresolved targets, disputed identity, stale observations and reviewer disposition. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "f-mapping-context-d04", "name": "export-scope", "description": "Recipient scope, field selection, linked-artifact authorization and refusal result. Candidate answer group; nested instance constraints require an adoption profile.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "f-mapping-context-a01", "name": "Profile-qualified exchange evidence record", "description": "Versioned descriptive evidence for profile-qualified exchange, including unresolved claims and policy-scoped source references; underlying payloads stay externally mastered.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured catalogue evidence record", "Human-readable authorized view" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID fallback. Independent artifact and revision identifiers; dates and digests do not replace identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "fn-recognize-work", "name": "Propose work identity", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Compare recognition evidence and candidate identities without an automatic merge.", "inputs": [ "Recognition evidence", "Identifier scheme", "Candidate work references" ], "outputs": [ "Identity proposal or unresolved-candidate report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "A profile distinguishes work identity from recording and file identity" ], "effects": [ "Record a local identity proposal; any merge needs a separate steward disposition", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "fn-bind-realization", "name": "Record realization context", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate an expression descriptor and typed embodiment references with this work.", "inputs": [ "Work ID", "Expression ID", "Profile and evidence", "Embodiment references" ], "outputs": [ "Versioned realization binding or level-mismatch report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "Every reference declares an entity level; missing masters remain unresolved" ], "effects": [ "Write only work-local descriptors and links; do not create or modify media or editions", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "fn-record-contribution", "name": "Record contribution assertion", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach attributed credit and provenance with disagreement visible.", "inputs": [ "Target level", "Contributor reference or explicit unknown", "Role vocabulary", "Evidence and disclosure scope" ], "outputs": [ "Scoped credit assertion or refusal report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "Disclosure authority exists; attribution evidence and legal ownership are distinguished" ], "effects": [ "Record the claim and contrary evidence; do not grant rights or reveal private identities", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "fn-relate-work", "name": "Propose work relationship", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an evidence-qualified derivation, part or aggregation link.", "inputs": [ "Source and target IDs", "Typed relation", "Profile", "Rationale" ], "outputs": [ "Relation proposal or ambiguity report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "Target level and direction are resolved; relevant part-cycle constraints checked" ], "effects": [ "Maintain a local relationship assertion; do not mutate the target or equate co-published works", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "fn-attach-rights-context", "name": "Attach external rights decision", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Associate scoped rights evidence and an external reuse decision with a target.", "inputs": [ "Rights or decision reference", "Target version", "Territory and term", "Observation time" ], "outputs": [ "Qualified context record or unresolved-clearance report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "External authority and scope are identified; absent or expired evidence cannot become permission" ], "effects": [ "Store references and uncertainty only; no licence grant, rights transfer or enforcement", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "fn-revise-catalogue", "name": "Revise catalogue description", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Apply an authorized local metadata revision and prepare a scoped projection.", "inputs": [ "Expected revision", "Patch with rationale", "Profile", "Recipient scope" ], "outputs": [ "New revision and loss report, or conflict/refusal report", "No-change refusal with reason" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized metadata steward; target work and expected revision identified", "Applicable retention, access and evidence policies resolved", "Concurrency and recipient authorization pass; identity changes receive explicit review" ], "effects": [ "Preserve supersession evidence under retention policy; do not publish, withdraw or delete external works or assets", "Return refusal without mutation if a precondition fails; record minimal authorized operation evidence" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-PER-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding for contributors and individual claimants; person master and lifecycle remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding for collective contributors, stewards and publishers; organization authority is not inferred from this link. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-KNW-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Language and controlled terminology references; vocabulary governance remains external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-KNW-003", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Rights assertions and qualified legal authority, including unregistered rights; adjudication and transfer remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-MED-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Typed rendition and media master references; no file lifecycle, transcoding or preservation execution. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MED-003", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Publication and edition references, retaining many-to-many embodiment context without release operations. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-MED-004", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Recording identities, including ISRC at recording level; no assumption of equivalence to a work or byte sequence. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "WM-REC-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Governed documents and source evidence retained in their record masters; textual embodiment is optional. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "WM-REC-004", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Scholarly-publication specialization remains separately governed after the legacy split; no peer-review lifecycle here. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-MED-008", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional provenance credential reference; verification and credential lifecycle remain external. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "IFLA LRM", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Conceptual WEMI alignment to the cited 2017-12 text, with profile-specific work boundaries and later-version review required. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001" ] }, { "target": "Schema.org CreativeWork", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Broad discovery projection with explicit target level and loss report; not exact identity equivalence. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "BIBFRAME 2.0", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Explicit Work/Instance/Item crosswalk; expression boundaries can differ and mappings are not implemented. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "DCMI Metadata Terms", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Descriptive property mapping with typed target level, source and profile version. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Claim lineage mapping; neither attribution nor a hash certifies truth. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "ODRL 2.2", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Policy-reference alignment only; external decisions own evaluation, interpretation and enforcement. No registry-ledger edge exists for this model; this is a proposed local binding, not a shared-registry amendment.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Identify the adopting Dimension and metadata steward with a documented authority basis, separately from creators and rights holders", "Pin a work-boundary profile, namespaces, language and role vocabularies and external master bindings", "Specify access, privacy, evidence, retention, dispute and correction procedures before operating instances", "Document candidate nested schemas and acceptance fixtures; research field groups are not executable contracts" ], "namespace_guidance": "Use a Dimension-governed namespace for work, expression-context, assertion and artifact IDs. Preserve foreign identifiers with schemes and entity levels. Do not infer authorship or ownership from namespace control.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-med-001", "Legacy N5 is a reconciliation input, not canonical authority", "Proposed neighboring bindings require version pins before operational use" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve work identity across title and metadata corrections; do not auto-merge on labels, checksums or media codes", "Choose a preferred assertion only with evidence and authority; retain uncertainty and competing claims subject to lawful retention", "Model entity levels explicitly; an expression, a published edition, a recording and a copy cannot silently become a work" ], "patch_rules": [ "Require expected revision, actor, reason, source and effective or observation time; refuse stale writes", "Use explicit alias, split or supersession records for corrected identities; retain reversibility and authorized continuity", "Retain minimal change evidence without indefinitely preserving personal or restricted payloads" ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Version boundary and vocabulary changes; report lossy mappings before export", "Do not inherit legacy universal conformance, mandatory creator identification, registration assumptions or one-to-many-only embodiment rules" ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension" ], "timestamp_rule": "Known instants use RFC 3339 with seconds and explicit offset or Z. Keep event time separate from observation and ingestion time. Preserve uncertain dates or intervals with declared precision rather than inventing exact instants.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use stable artifact ID plus explicit revision or sequence; a display date is not identity. Repeated component occurrences have independent relation identities.", "integrity_rule": "Record digest algorithm and digest for exact bytes, provenance and access scope when available. Digests identify byte integrity, not work equivalence, authorship, rights or truth." }, "policies": [ "Metadata stewardship is distinct from copyright ownership, creative contribution and custody of a copy", "All admitted standards are conceptual alignments. No compliance certification or runtime implementation is claimed", "Public availability, credit, registration status or an ODRL offer must not be promoted to universal reuse permission", "Sensitive, harmful or culturally restricted material is represented only through policy-qualified description and references; do not embed actionable dangerous content", "Independent review and direct source/version verification remain open under the single-provider waiver" ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve authorized view and evidence scope at every linked level; return unknown or redacted explicitly" ], "create": [ "Create a local work record only with identity rationale, evidence or explicit incompleteness, and an accountable metadata steward" ], "update": [ "Apply revision-checked metadata patches; require reviewed identity and relation changes and preserve scoped contradictory evidence" ], "delete": [ "Apply the adopting Dimension retention and disposition policy to this model own records; authorized record/storage owners execute erasure", "Retire or supersede catalogue records with minimal lawful tombstones; erase restricted payloads when authorized and propagate disposition requests to linked masters through their owners", "Local retirement or erasure does not withdraw a work, extinguish rights, erase external copies or override legal holds" ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Metadata steward", "responsibilities": [ "Approve identity and description changes within documented scope" ] }, { "name": "Contributor or authorized representative", "responsibilities": [ "Supply or contest attribution evidence without automatic rights authority" ] }, { "name": "Rights reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Provide qualified external rights and reuse decision references" ] }, { "name": "Catalogue curator", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain expression, relation and mapping assertions" ] }, { "name": "Access and records custodian", "responsibilities": [ "Apply privacy, access, retention and lawful disposition policies" ] }, { "name": "Evidence reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Review conflicts, omissions and source limits without claiming independent provider review" ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny access unless the adopting policy authorizes the recipient and purpose. Public catalogue fields are a curated view; evidence, personal identities and rights documents have independent restrictions.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Embargoed, pseudonymous, disputed or culturally restricted records require a documented scoped exception", "Emergency or legal overrides need explicit authority, expiry and minimum disclosure; they do not grant reuse rights" ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record authorized reads of sensitive evidence and every metadata change with actor, purpose, scope and revision", "Store only necessary local operation evidence; external audit, policy engines and record owners retain their own lifecycles" ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Read AGENTS.md and the reviewable-draft holds", "Read the specification, adopting Dimension policies and pinned work-boundary profile", "Resolve external masters and authorized evidence before filling questions or proposing changes" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed context for one creative work with WEMI-aware identity, typed realization and embodiment links, scoped contribution and rights assertions, and catalogue continuity. A separate frozen local Codex no-tools self-audit found no critical conflicts. Independent review, source/version verification, domain profiles and executable conformance remain holds. This is a noncanonical reviewable draft, not universal coverage or a legal decision service.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Work recognition, identifiers, disputes and abstraction levels" }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Creative progress and catalogue state separated from external publication events" }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Derivation, components, aggregation and externally mastered neighbors" }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Typed event, effective and observation times with uncertainty" }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Claim evidence, activities, agents and conflicting assertions" }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Metadata stewardship, contribution, custody and rights holding separated" }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Repository research validation is available; executable instance schemas and mapping fixtures remain incomplete" }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Public versus restricted views across linked artifacts" }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Policy-owned erasure and minimal continuity evidence; no destruction of abstract works" }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual mappings documented; no verified round-trip transforms" }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Titles, classification and scoped representative characteristics" }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Recognition evidence distinct from file identity and source truth" }, { "dimension": "capabilities and behaviour", "status": "covered", "notes": "Six proposed metadata operations with authority, preconditions, refusal and limited effects" }, { "dimension": "physical measurements", "status": "not-applicable", "notes": "The work root has no physical dimensions; extent and accessibility observations reference an expression, embodiment or asset" }, { "dimension": "cultural and legal profiles", "status": "gap", "notes": "Community authority, national copyright, moral rights, traditional expressions and automated authorship need qualified profile review" } ], "known_omissions": [ "Executable nested instance schemas, vocabulary pins and tested mappings", "Comprehensive music, film, choreography, interactive, live and evolving-work cataloguing profiles", "Qualified national rights, orphan works, collective rights, cultural protocols and machine-generated authorship review", "Independent external research and direct HTTP source checks; later IFLA revisions and stable Schema.org release pin" ], "conflicts": [ "LRM, BIBFRAME and Schema.org abstraction levels differ; explicit profiles resolve local use without asserting universal equivalence", "Legacy manifestation-only ISRC classification, registration-only rights assumptions and inherited conformance claims are rejected" ], "regional_assumptions": [ "Bibliographic standards are modelling inputs, not universal definitions of legal works", "WIPO guidance is general information; no national copyright eligibility, term or clearance ruling is made", "English is the package language; multilingual names, scripts and cultural authority require adoption profiles" ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Same title and same subject can describe distinct works; never deduplicate on these alone", "Same recording can have different files; ISRC and checksums cannot become a work identifier", "One aggregate manifestation may embody multiple works without transferring ownership", "An unknown creator or missing surviving realization is not invented to satisfy mandatory metadata", "Unregistered copyright, public availability and licence offers do not settle reuse permission", "Local retirement is not withdrawal from circulation or cancellation of rights" ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "One persistent conceptual work is the subject. Internal expression descriptors and typed embodiment context do not transfer ownership of media, editions, rights or events. The registry standalone-mm value is a record-plane classification and is not the subject-kind enum. The legacy WEMI flag is reconciled with the current registry purpose through explicit entity levels and external masters." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Persistent work boundary", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Recognition evidence and work identity persist independently of titles, files, recordings and release events. Explicit uncertainty does not assert that an unrealized idea is an established LRM work." }, { "concept": "Internal WEMI and external masters", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Work-local expression context retains independent identifiers and typed links; editions, assets, copies and their operational lifecycles remain externally mastered. This reconciles the legacy flag with the current purpose." }, { "concept": "Universal work and expression equivalence", "disposition": "rejected", "rationale": "The result requires a profile for translation, arrangement, adaptation and evolving-work boundaries. LRM, BIBFRAME and Schema.org are not presented as equivalent class systems." }, { "concept": "Identifier collapse", "disposition": "rejected", "rationale": "The admitted ISRC authority guidance limits the code to recording identity. File digests, titles and generic vocabulary typing cannot prove abstract-work equivalence." }, { "concept": "Embodiments and aggregation", "disposition": "accepted with qualification", "rationale": "Unpublished embodiments and many-to-many expression links are allowed. Work parts, aggregation intent and component occurrences remain distinct; packaging alone does not establish one work or rights ownership." }, { "concept": "Legacy and supplement authority", "disposition": "reconciled", "rationale": "Both inputs were read as leads. Inherited conformance, mandatory identified creators, registration-only rights and operational release/transfer ownership are rejected or qualified. The scholarly-publication split remains external." }, { "concept": "Attribution and ownership", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Contribution, metadata stewardship, copy custody and rights holding have different roles and evidence. Anonymous, collective, disputed and pseudonymous credit can be represented without fabricated private identities." }, { "concept": "Rights and reuse authority", "disposition": "accepted as references only", "rationale": "A rights assertion, public link or licence offer does not become permission. Qualified external decisions retain target, territory, term and observation context; no national legal determination is made here." }, { "concept": "Provenance and origin claims", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Claim lineage, generation assertions and credential references retain uncertainty. Neither a digest nor attribution evidence certifies truth, authorship, copyright eligibility or credential validity." }, { "concept": "Local functions and relation proposals", "disposition": "accepted as proposed only", "rationale": "All six operations have preconditions, refusal outputs and local metadata effects. No registered relation ledger edge is invented; proposed bindings do not grant ownership of target operations or mutate the registry." }, { "concept": "Retention and disclosure", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "Artifact access is independently scoped. Revision evidence is subject to lawful erasure and minimal tombstones rather than perpetual payload retention. Catalogue retirement does not withdraw the work or extinguish rights." }, { "concept": "Source evidence and currentness", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "Seven browser documents and one official indexed overview support selected claims. Direct HTTP was not attempted, later LRM revisions are unreviewed and Schema.org is a development page; no complete source or current-version assurance can be inferred." }, { "concept": "Operational profiles and coverage", "disposition": "deferred", "rationale": "Candidate answer groups and conceptual alignments do not supply nested schemas, executable transforms or tested domain and legal profiles. Cultural authority and unusual creative forms remain explicit gaps." }, { "concept": "Independent provider review", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner override. This distinct no-tools phase is a local Codex self-audit and cannot be represented as external agreement or independent second-provider review." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver; the separate frozen Codex no-tools self-audit is not an independent second-provider review.", "Live source and version verification remains incomplete. Direct HTTP was not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction: no status or body hash was measured. Seven sources had browser document retrieval and BIBFRAME had only official indexed text. Later IFLA revisions and a stable Schema.org release pin remain unreviewed; the coordinator must run check_sources.py and verify claims and versions separately.", "Work/expression boundaries, contemporary and evolving creative forms, cultural authority, national copyright, moral rights, orphan claims and automated authorship require qualified adoption-profile review. The selected bibliographic and general rights sources do not establish universal coverage or legal permission.", "Nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor bindings, executable vocabulary mappings, privacy and disposition implementations, and adversarial instance fixtures remain incomplete. All functions are proposed local metadata operations; no runtime implementation or conformance certification is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Verify current source versions and selected claim support, review later LRM revisions and pin a stable Schema.org version before claiming operational alignment.", "Develop qualified creative-domain and rights profiles plus nested schemas and fixtures for translation/adaptation, anonymous authorship, aggregates, duplicate titles, disputed rights, withdrawal and lossy mappings.", "Restore independent external review before any canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 8, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 48, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }