# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-21T17:15:35Z", "synthesisSha256": "0ce941ed99aae900997824671b389259e5e0ca8b988a3e43bc4c394786d85213", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-MEM-005", "registryId": "vr.wm-mem-005", "name": "Procedural Memory", "version": "0.1.0", "previousVersions": [], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "INF.MEM.PRC" ], "tags": [ "procedural", "memory", "inf.mem.prc" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-mem-005-procedural-memory/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-mem-005", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-mem-005", "model_id": "WM-MEM-005", "name": "Procedural Memory", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Represent a way of acting an agent has acquired through learning, with evidence, applicability and revision bindings distinct from instructions supplied to it.", "scope_statement": "One persistent, agent-scoped learned behavior record, whose revisions bind acquired representations to learning provenance and evidence of use. This is an information entity about learned behavior, not the learning event, executable runtime, biological substrate or an assertion of general competence.", "in_scope": [ "Learned behavior identity, acquisition basis and representation bindings, including opaque representations.", "Applicability cues, input and action semantics, termination expectations and subordinate skill references.", "Evidence-linked performance claims, counterexamples, transfer limits and local revision eligibility.", "Subject-specific policy references, safe disclosure and interoperability losses." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Authoring generic instructions or treating copied instructions as demonstrated learning.", "Training execution, rollout execution, runtime action selection, recall ranking, context assembly and policy enforcement.", "Generic memory-store, item, episode, formation, consolidation, conflict, retention, sharing, trust and quarantine master lifecycles.", "Medical or neurological diagnosis, biological memory mechanisms and human competency certification.", "Operational instructions for dangerous behavior; only risk classification, restriction and escalation metadata are admitted." ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-KNW-005 Agent Skill / Instruction", "distinction": "Registry parent is a candidate alignment, not automatic semantic inheritance. Supplied instructions may be acquisition inputs; a learned record needs an evidenced acquisition claim. Being executable does not establish that it was learned.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MEM-002 Memory Item and WM-MEM-001 Memory Store", "distinction": "Reference generic item identity and store scope. This record owns only learned-behavior qualifications, not generic storage or retention machinery. Stable record identity is distinct from behavior revision and payload digest.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MEM-003 Interaction Episode and WM-MEM-006 Memory Formation Event", "distinction": "Carry evidence and acquisition references. Neither an observed episode nor a formation event is itself the reusable learned behavior. No training or episode execution is owned here.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MEM-007 Memory Recall Event and WM-MEM-013 Context Assembly", "distinction": "A retrieval cue is local metadata. Actual recall, ranking and inclusion in context have separate event masters and cannot grant execution permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MEM-008 Memory Consolidation and WM-MEM-009 Memory Conflict and Precedence Rule", "distinction": "Bind resulting revisions and conflict decisions; do not run consolidation or decide global precedence. A newer revision is not automatically better or authorized.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "neighbor": "WM-MEM-010, WM-MEM-011, WM-MEM-017, WM-MEM-018 and WM-MEM-020", "distinction": "Retention, sharing, context policy, trust and quarantine are external authorities. Local eligibility must not override their decisions, including revocation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "Execution and evaluation records", "distinction": "Attach separately mastered outcomes and assessments. A policy representation, structural validation or successful training trace is not a guarantee of future success.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-006" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Option Discovery in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning using Spatio-Temporal Clustering", "organization": "Indian Institute of Technology Madras", "url": "https://arxiv.org/html/1605.05359v3", "version_or_date": "arXiv:1605.05359v3, 2020-09-21", "source_type": "scientific", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Research example of acquired action policies, initiation and termination, with reuse limited by environment assumptions. Not a universal memory specification." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "W3C", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation, 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Entity, activity, derivation, attribution and revision alignment; provenance assertions do not prove learning or success." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "The P-PLAN Ontology", "organization": "Ontology Engineering Group and Information Sciences Institute", "url": "https://www.opmw.org/model/p-plan17052013/", "version_or_date": "Revision 1.1, 2013-05-17", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 2, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Optional plan, step and variable projection with separate execution correspondence. Not every learned policy has a symbolic plan." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "AI Risk Management Framework 1.0: Core", "organization": "NIST", "url": "https://airc.nist.gov/airmf-resources/airmf/5-sec-core/", "version_or_date": "AI RMF 1.0, 2023; page says revision in progress", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Context, measurement uncertainty, oversight and continuing risk review inform proposed evidence and adoption gates. Voluntary framework, not certification." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "ODRL Information Model 2.2", "organization": "W3C", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation, 2018-02-15", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Policy-expression alignment for permissions, prohibitions, duties and constraints; enforcement belongs outside the record." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)", "organization": "W3C", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/", "version_or_date": "Recommendation text at accessed URL; release pin pending", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Optional graph constraints and validation reports. Structural conformance cannot establish competence or behavior safety." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", "organization": "IETF", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339.html", "version_or_date": "RFC 3339, July 2002", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-21T17:14:33Z", "relevance": "Timestamp syntax for observation and validity metadata, not proof of causal ordering or clock accuracy." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-bundle", "name": "Learned identity", "description": "Subject-specific context for learned identity.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "layers": [ { "id": "acquired-way-layer", "name": "Acquired way of acting context", "description": "Identify the agent-scoped learned behavior and its acquisition claim. Keep unverified acquisition explicit; copied instructions alone do not satisfy the admission criterion.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "acquired-way", "name": "Acquired way of acting", "description": "Identify the agent-scoped learned behavior and its acquisition claim. Keep unverified acquisition explicit; copied instructions alone do not satisfy the admission criterion.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "acquired-way-q1", "text": "Which master identity and agent scope distinguish this learned behavior from another agent learning the same task?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "master_record_id", "agent_scope_ref", "memory_item_ref" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-q2", "text": "What acquired way of acting does the record claim, and what supplied instruction remains a separate input?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "behavior_summary", "acquisition_claim", "instruction_ref", "claim_status" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-q3", "text": "Is the acquired representation symbolic, statistical, hybrid or opaque, and what can be inspected?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "representation_kind", "inspectability", "inspection_limit" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-q4", "text": "Which accountable role maintains this learned-behavior assertion?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "maintainer_role_ref", "responsibility_scope", "authority_ref" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "acquired-way-data1", "name": "Acquired way of acting identity answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: master_record_id, agent_scope_ref, memory_item_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-data2", "name": "Acquired way of acting definition answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: behavior_summary, acquisition_claim, instruction_ref, claim_status. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-data3", "name": "Acquired way of acting classification answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: representation_kind, inspectability, inspection_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "acquired-way-data4", "name": "Acquired way of acting ownership answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: maintainer_role_ref, responsibility_scope, authority_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "acquired-way-artifact", "name": "Acquired way of acting record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-layer", "name": "Representation binding context", "description": "Bind the record to an exact behavior revision and its representation dependencies. A changed payload or dependency requires explicit compatibility review.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "revision-binding", "name": "Representation binding", "description": "Bind the record to an exact behavior revision and its representation dependencies. A changed payload or dependency requires explicit compatibility review.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "revision-binding-q1", "text": "Which revision and payload digest identify the represented behavior without replacing its master identity?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "revision_id", "payload_ref", "digest_algorithm", "digest_value" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-q2", "text": "Which required subordinate skills, observation encodings or action bindings are pinned for this revision?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "dependency_refs", "dependency_versions", "required_flags", "unresolved_dependencies" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-q3", "text": "How is a fork or transferred copy related to its source without asserting identical competence?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "source_revision_ref", "derivation_kind", "receiving_scope_ref" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-q4", "text": "What mismatch between representation, dependency and declared revision blocks local acceptance?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "binding_check_ref", "mismatch_details", "acceptance_state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "revision-binding-data1", "name": "Representation binding identity answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: revision_id, payload_ref, digest_algorithm, digest_value. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-data2", "name": "Representation binding composition answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: dependency_refs, dependency_versions, required_flags, unresolved_dependencies. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-data3", "name": "Representation binding relationship answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: source_revision_ref, derivation_kind, receiving_scope_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "revision-binding-data4", "name": "Representation binding validation answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: binding_check_ref, mismatch_details, acceptance_state. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "revision-binding-artifact", "name": "Representation binding record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "acquisition-bundle", "name": "Acquisition evidence", "description": "Subject-specific context for acquisition evidence.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "layers": [ { "id": "learning-basis-layer", "name": "Learning basis context", "description": "Record evidence that the behavior was acquired. Formation and training are external activities; imported acquisition claims may remain unknown or disputed.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "learning-basis", "name": "Learning basis", "description": "Record evidence that the behavior was acquired. Formation and training are external activities; imported acquisition claims may remain unknown or disputed.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "learning-basis-q1", "text": "Which formation or learning activity produced the acquired representation and what evidence supports that link?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "formation_event_ref", "learning_activity_ref", "evidence_refs", "attribution_status" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-q2", "text": "What learning mode and training configuration are declared without reproducing the training engine?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "learning_mode", "configuration_ref", "configuration_version", "unknowns" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-q3", "text": "Which demonstrations, experiences or feedback sources informed acquisition and what use restrictions apply?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "input_evidence_refs", "feedback_origin", "use_policy_refs", "redaction_status" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-q4", "text": "When did acquisition occur and when was its provenance assertion observed?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "acquisition_interval", "observed_at", "clock_basis", "time_uncertainty" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "learning-basis-data1", "name": "Learning basis provenance answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: formation_event_ref, learning_activity_ref, evidence_refs, attribution_status. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-data2", "name": "Learning basis process answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: learning_mode, configuration_ref, configuration_version, unknowns. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-data3", "name": "Learning basis evidence answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: input_evidence_refs, feedback_origin, use_policy_refs, redaction_status. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "learning-basis-data4", "name": "Learning basis temporal answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: acquisition_interval, observed_at, clock_basis, time_uncertainty. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "learning-basis-artifact", "name": "Learning basis record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-layer", "name": "Generalization basis context", "description": "Separate an acquired reusable behavior from a replay of one episode. Generalization is a scoped claim requiring evidence, not a property inferred from a record label.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "generalization-basis", "name": "Generalization basis", "description": "Separate an acquired reusable behavior from a replay of one episode. Generalization is a scoped claim requiring evidence, not a property inferred from a record label.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "generalization-basis-q1", "text": "What reuse criterion distinguishes the learned behavior from literal replay of its source episode?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "reuse_criterion", "episode_refs", "criterion_owner_ref" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-q2", "text": "Which training and assessment partitions or other controls address memorization and leakage?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "partition_refs", "overlap_check_ref", "leakage_limitations" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-q3", "text": "What evidence compares acquired behavior with an untrained or prior baseline under matched conditions?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "comparison_report_ref", "baseline_revision_ref", "condition_match", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-q4", "text": "Which learning provenance is missing or disputed and how does that limit the claim?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "missing_evidence", "disputed_assertions", "eligibility_restriction", "review_ref" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "generalization-basis-data1", "name": "Generalization basis requirement answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: reuse_criterion, episode_refs, criterion_owner_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-data2", "name": "Generalization basis quality answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: partition_refs, overlap_check_ref, leakage_limitations. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-data3", "name": "Generalization basis measurement answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: comparison_report_ref, baseline_revision_ref, condition_match, uncertainty. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "generalization-basis-data4", "name": "Generalization basis exception answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: missing_evidence, disputed_assertions, eligibility_restriction, review_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "generalization-basis-artifact", "name": "Generalization basis record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "applicability-bundle", "name": "Applicability and behavior", "description": "Subject-specific context for applicability and behavior.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004" ], "layers": [ { "id": "initiation-context-layer", "name": "Initiation context context", "description": "Describe conditions in which reuse has evidence. Recognition of a cue is distinct from permission to act; unknown observations cannot be silently treated as matching.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "initiation-context", "name": "Initiation context", "description": "Describe conditions in which reuse has evidence. Recognition of a cue is distinct from permission to act; unknown observations cannot be silently treated as matching.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "initiation-context-q1", "text": "Which initiation conditions and excluded contexts bound the learned behavior?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "initiation_predicate_ref", "excluded_contexts", "predicate_version" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-q2", "text": "What observation, resource and environment assumptions must a caller establish?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "observation_schema_ref", "resource_assumptions", "environment_version", "freshness_limit" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-q3", "text": "What result is recorded when cue matching is unknown, ambiguous or stale?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "match_state", "unknown_inputs", "staleness_reason", "review_route" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-q4", "text": "Does applicability depend on a physical frame or location, or is that dimension inapplicable?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "spatial_applicability", "frame_ref", "location_scope_ref", "not_applicable_reason" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "initiation-context-data1", "name": "Initiation context constraint answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: initiation_predicate_ref, excluded_contexts, predicate_version. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-data2", "name": "Initiation context requirement answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: observation_schema_ref, resource_assumptions, environment_version, freshness_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-data3", "name": "Initiation context state answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: match_state, unknown_inputs, staleness_reason, review_route. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "initiation-context-data4", "name": "Initiation context spatial answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: spatial_applicability, frame_ref, location_scope_ref, not_applicable_reason. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "initiation-context-artifact", "name": "Initiation context record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-layer", "name": "Behavior contract context", "description": "Declare intended action semantics and stopping expectations at a descriptive level. Opaque policies may be referenced without inventing a sequence of explainable steps.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "policy-contract", "name": "Behavior contract", "description": "Declare intended action semantics and stopping expectations at a descriptive level. Opaque policies may be referenced without inventing a sequence of explainable steps.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "policy-contract-q1", "text": "What inputs, outputs and action vocabulary describe the behavior at its declared abstraction level?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "input_contract_ref", "output_contract_ref", "action_vocabulary_ref", "abstraction_level" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-q2", "text": "Which symbolic steps or policy binding express the acquired behavior and which internal structure is unknown?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "symbolic_plan_ref", "policy_binding_ref", "opaque_parts", "representation_limit" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-q3", "text": "Which termination, timeout and interruption conditions are declared for external execution?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "termination_contract_ref", "timeout_policy_ref", "interrupt_contract_ref", "outcome_codes" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-q4", "text": "Which possible effects and failure modes require external containment or refusal?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "effect_categories", "failure_modes", "containment_policy_ref", "refusal_conditions" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "policy-contract-data1", "name": "Behavior contract composition answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: input_contract_ref, output_contract_ref, action_vocabulary_ref, abstraction_level. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-data2", "name": "Behavior contract process answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: symbolic_plan_ref, policy_binding_ref, opaque_parts, representation_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-data3", "name": "Behavior contract event answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: termination_contract_ref, timeout_policy_ref, interrupt_contract_ref, outcome_codes. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "policy-contract-data4", "name": "Behavior contract constraint answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: effect_categories, failure_modes, containment_policy_ref, refusal_conditions. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "policy-contract-artifact", "name": "Behavior contract record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment-bundle", "name": "Behavior evidence", "description": "Subject-specific context for behavior evidence.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "layers": [ { "id": "performance-claim-layer", "name": "Performance claim context", "description": "Attach external assessment results to the exact revision and conditions. Preserve metric meaning, uncertainty and denominator; absence of failures is not proof of reliability.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "performance-claim", "name": "Performance claim", "description": "Attach external assessment results to the exact revision and conditions. Preserve metric meaning, uncertainty and denominator; absence of failures is not proof of reliability.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "performance-claim-q1", "text": "Which metric, unit, sample count and uncertainty qualify a reported success claim?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "metric_definition_ref", "metric_value", "unit", "sample_count", "uncertainty" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-q2", "text": "Which evaluator and report support the result for this exact behavior revision?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "evaluation_report_ref", "evaluated_revision_ref", "evaluator_ref", "evaluation_method_ref" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-q3", "text": "At what assessment time and environment version was performance measured?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "assessment_time", "recorded_at", "environment_version", "validity_interval" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-q4", "text": "Which limitations prevent comparing this result with another evaluation?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "comparability_limits", "population_scope", "excluded_trials", "missing_outcomes" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "performance-claim-data1", "name": "Performance claim measurement answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: metric_definition_ref, metric_value, unit, sample_count, uncertainty. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-data2", "name": "Performance claim evidence answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: evaluation_report_ref, evaluated_revision_ref, evaluator_ref, evaluation_method_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-data3", "name": "Performance claim temporal answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: assessment_time, recorded_at, environment_version, validity_interval. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "performance-claim-data4", "name": "Performance claim quality answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: comparability_limits, population_scope, excluded_trials, missing_outcomes. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "performance-claim-artifact", "name": "Performance claim record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-layer", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer context", "description": "Retain adverse evidence and transfer restrictions alongside favorable results. Reuse across agents, tasks or changed environments requires a separate evidence-qualified decision.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ], "findings": [ { "id": "failure-transfer", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer", "description": "Retain adverse evidence and transfer restrictions alongside favorable results. Reuse across agents, tasks or changed environments requires a separate evidence-qualified decision.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ], "questions": [ { "id": "failure-transfer-q1", "text": "Which failed or harmful outcomes contradict the claimed competence and under what conditions?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "counterexample_refs", "conditions", "impact_category", "claim_revision_needed" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-q2", "text": "What changed between the tested context and proposed receiving agent or task?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "source_context_ref", "target_context_ref", "context_delta", "transfer_report_ref" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-q3", "text": "Which external assessment permits, limits or rejects the proposed transfer?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "transfer_decision_ref", "decision_scope", "decision_expiry", "unresolved_conditions" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-q4", "text": "What drift or regression evidence makes earlier performance support stale?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "drift_report_ref", "regression_report_ref", "affected_claims", "review_due" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "failure-transfer-data1", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer exception answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: counterexample_refs, conditions, impact_category, claim_revision_needed. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-data2", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer relationship answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: source_context_ref, target_context_ref, context_delta, transfer_report_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-data3", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer decision answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: transfer_decision_ref, decision_scope, decision_expiry, unresolved_conditions. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ] }, { "id": "failure-transfer-data4", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer quality answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: drift_report_ref, regression_report_ref, affected_claims, review_due. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "failure-transfer-artifact", "name": "Counterexamples and transfer record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-001" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "continuity-bundle", "name": "Revision continuity", "description": "Subject-specific context for revision continuity.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "layers": [ { "id": "eligibility-layer", "name": "Reuse eligibility context", "description": "Local record states summarize evidence and authority without duplicating enforcement. Draft, eligible, restricted and retired are proposed profile states, not standard-mandated terms.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "eligibility", "name": "Reuse eligibility", "description": "Local record states summarize evidence and authority without duplicating enforcement. Draft, eligible, restricted and retired are proposed profile states, not standard-mandated terms.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "eligibility-q1", "text": "Which evidence-backed state and reason describe this revision for reuse?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "eligibility_state", "state_reason", "supporting_decision_refs", "effective_at" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-q2", "text": "Which current external policy and reviewer decision constrain eligibility independently of performance?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "context_policy_ref", "sharing_grant_ref", "reviewer_decision_ref", "policy_version" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-q3", "text": "What trust or quarantine decision prevents admitting poisoned or unreviewed learning evidence?", "kind": "security", "answer_data": [ "trust_assessment_ref", "quarantine_decision_ref", "blocked_evidence_refs", "safe_summary" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-q4", "text": "What happens when eligibility evidence is revoked, inaccessible or contradictory?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "unresolved_authority", "revocation_ref", "restriction_state", "conflict_rule_ref" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "eligibility-data1", "name": "Reuse eligibility lifecycle answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: eligibility_state, state_reason, supporting_decision_refs, effective_at. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-data2", "name": "Reuse eligibility authority answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: context_policy_ref, sharing_grant_ref, reviewer_decision_ref, policy_version. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-data3", "name": "Reuse eligibility security answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: trust_assessment_ref, quarantine_decision_ref, blocked_evidence_refs, safe_summary. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "eligibility-data4", "name": "Reuse eligibility exception answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: unresolved_authority, revocation_ref, restriction_state, conflict_rule_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "eligibility-artifact", "name": "Reuse eligibility record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "revision-change-layer", "name": "Revision and supersession context", "description": "Record revision lineage and review consequences. Consolidation decisions remain external; a record rollback cannot undo actions already performed by an agent.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "revision-change", "name": "Revision and supersession", "description": "Record revision lineage and review consequences. Consolidation decisions remain external; a record rollback cannot undo actions already performed by an agent.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "revision-change-q1", "text": "What revision supersedes this behavior and why was the change proposed?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "successor_revision_ref", "change_reason", "consolidation_event_ref" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-q2", "text": "Which evidence must be rechecked after a policy, representation or dependency change?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "change_impact", "invalidated_assessment_refs", "recheck_requirements" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-q3", "text": "Which effective intervals distinguish historical eligibility from current reuse?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "effective_from", "effective_until", "recorded_at", "interval_conflicts" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-q4", "text": "What limits a rollback to a previous representation without undoing external effects?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "rollback_target_ref", "rollback_authority_ref", "compatibility_check_ref", "external_effect_limit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "revision-change-data1", "name": "Revision and supersession lifecycle answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: successor_revision_ref, change_reason, consolidation_event_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-data2", "name": "Revision and supersession validation answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: change_impact, invalidated_assessment_refs, recheck_requirements. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-data3", "name": "Revision and supersession temporal answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: effective_from, effective_until, recorded_at, interval_conflicts. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "revision-change-data4", "name": "Revision and supersession constraint answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: rollback_target_ref, rollback_authority_ref, compatibility_check_ref, external_effect_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "revision-change-artifact", "name": "Revision and supersession record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "exchange-bundle", "name": "Governed exchange", "description": "Subject-specific context for governed exchange.", "rationale": "Keep this concern separately answerable while preserving evidence and external ownership boundaries. This grouping is a local design proposal.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "disclosure-layer", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings context", "description": "Bind sensitive learned payloads and evidence to external access and retention decisions. Payload deletion, reference tombstones and learned influence removal are different claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ], "findings": [ { "id": "disclosure", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings", "description": "Bind sensitive learned payloads and evidence to external access and retention decisions. Payload deletion, reference tombstones and learned influence removal are different claims.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ], "questions": [ { "id": "disclosure-q1", "text": "Which roles may read the behavior summary, representation and learning evidence separately?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "summary_grant_ref", "payload_grant_ref", "evidence_grant_ref", "access_scope" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-q2", "text": "Which sensitive source information may be retained in the learned representation and what disclosure review is required?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "sensitivity_categories", "exposure_assessment_ref", "redaction_decision_ref", "review_limit" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-q3", "text": "Which retention authority governs this local record and referenced payload disposal?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "retention_policy_ref", "disposal_due", "hold_ref", "payload_custodian_ref" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-q4", "text": "What evidence distinguishes deleting a record from removing learned influence in other copies or models?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "deletion_receipt_ref", "dependent_copy_refs", "influence_removal_claim", "claim_limit" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "disclosure-data1", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings access answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: summary_grant_ref, payload_grant_ref, evidence_grant_ref, access_scope. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-data2", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings privacy answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: sensitivity_categories, exposure_assessment_ref, redaction_decision_ref, review_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-data3", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings retention answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: retention_policy_ref, disposal_due, hold_ref, payload_custodian_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "disclosure-data4", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings requirement answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: deletion_receipt_ref, dependent_copy_refs, influence_removal_claim, claim_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "disclosure-artifact", "name": "Disclosure and disposal bindings record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-002" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "projection-layer", "name": "Projection and validation context", "description": "Declare optional projections and their losses. Shape validity, plan correspondence and timestamp syntax are distinct from behavioral equivalence or execution authorization.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "projection", "name": "Projection and validation", "description": "Declare optional projections and their losses. Shape validity, plan correspondence and timestamp syntax are distinct from behavioral equivalence or execution authorization.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "projection-q1", "text": "What mapping preserves learned origin and separates the behavior definition from executions?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "mapping_profile_ref", "origin_mapping", "execution_link_mapping", "mapping_version" ] }, { "id": "projection-q2", "text": "Which semantics are lost when exporting an opaque policy as a textual procedure or graph?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "loss_manifest", "unmapped_fields", "opaque_payload_ref", "equivalence_limit" ] }, { "id": "projection-q3", "text": "Which structural checks and external behavior tests are required before accepting an imported revision?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "schema_report_ref", "reference_check_ref", "behavior_report_ref", "acceptance_decision_ref" ] }, { "id": "projection-q4", "text": "How are timestamps and uncertain source times represented without inventing precision?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "timestamp_encoding", "offset", "source_precision", "uncertainty", "unknown_time_reason" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "projection-data1", "name": "Projection and validation interoperability answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: mapping_profile_ref, origin_mapping, execution_link_mapping, mapping_version. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "projection-data2", "name": "Projection and validation quality answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: loss_manifest, unmapped_fields, opaque_payload_ref, equivalence_limit. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "projection-data3", "name": "Projection and validation validation answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: schema_report_ref, reference_check_ref, behavior_report_ref, acceptance_decision_ref. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "projection-data4", "name": "Projection and validation temporal answer", "description": "Candidate answer group: timestamp_encoding, offset, source_precision, uncertainty, unknown_time_reason. Distinguish unknown, withheld and not applicable with reasons; nested schema is deferred.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "projection-artifact", "name": "Projection and validation record", "description": "Versioned evidence-linked view of this finding; external masters and payload access restrictions remain authoritative.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable projection" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system identifier first; governed IRI second; assigned UUID or ULID fallback. Qualify with revision and parent record; digest verifies bytes, not identity or truth.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "register-acquired-record", "name": "Register acquisition claim", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Create a local draft record from an evidenced acquisition assertion; never infer learning from an instruction document.", "inputs": [ "agent_scope_ref", "master_record_id", "acquisition_claim", "formation_event_ref" ], "outputs": [ "draft_record_ref", "missing_evidence_report", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Record writer role is authorized for this scope.", "Acquisition claim and its certainty are explicit." ], "effects": [ "Creates only a local draft; no training, execution or eligibility approval.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "id": "bind-behavior-revision", "name": "Bind behavior revision", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Bind an immutable representation revision and declared dependencies to an existing learned record.", "inputs": [ "record_ref", "expected_revision", "payload_ref", "digest", "dependency_refs" ], "outputs": [ "new_revision_ref", "binding_report", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Current revision matches expected revision.", "Payload and dependency metadata are readable under current policy." ], "effects": [ "Adds local revision metadata; incompatible or unresolved bindings remain restricted.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "attach-assessment-reference", "name": "Attach assessment reference", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Link a separately mastered assessment to its evaluated revision and preserve negative as well as positive results.", "inputs": [ "record_ref", "assessment_ref", "evaluated_revision_ref", "conditions" ], "outputs": [ "evidence_link_ref", "revision_mismatch_report", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Evidence-link role is authorized.", "Report attribution and evaluated revision can be resolved or explicitly marked uncertain." ], "effects": [ "Updates evidence links only; does not execute evaluation or certify competence.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "record-eligibility-decision", "name": "Record eligibility decision", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Record an external, scoped decision without issuing permission or running a policy engine.", "inputs": [ "revision_ref", "expected_record_version", "decision_ref", "policy_refs" ], "outputs": [ "eligibility_record_ref", "unresolved_authority_report", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized reviewer decision is present and current.", "Conflicts, quarantine and revocation are resolved by external authorities; unknown authority cannot yield eligible." ], "effects": [ "Writes scoped local eligibility metadata; runtime must recheck current policy before any action.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "record-supersession", "name": "Record supersession", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Connect old and new revisions to an external change or consolidation decision.", "inputs": [ "old_revision_ref", "new_revision_ref", "change_decision_ref" ], "outputs": [ "supersession_link_ref", "reassessment_requirements", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Revision identities and authorized change decision are resolved.", "Expected record version matches; history and adverse evidence remain addressable subject to retention policy." ], "effects": [ "Records lineage and marks affected local evidence stale; does not consolidate memories or reverse external effects.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "prepare-projection", "name": "Prepare restricted projection", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Produce a local review projection with explicit loss and access manifests; external sharing requires its owning authority.", "inputs": [ "revision_ref", "mapping_profile_ref", "access_decision_ref" ], "outputs": [ "local_projection_ref", "loss_manifest", "validation_report_ref", "refusal_or_conflict_report" ], "preconditions": [ "Current field-level access and license conditions are resolved.", "Mapping version and required references are available." ], "effects": [ "Creates a local derivative with source lineage; no transmission, executable equivalence or learned-influence removal is implied.", "On failed preconditions, return refusal details without mutation." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-KNW-005", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate registry-parent alignment with Agent Skill / Instruction; supplied instructions are separate from learned acquisition, with no automatic inheritance. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Store owns tenancy, persistence and storage operations. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Generic memory item owns shared identity and generic record lifecycle; bind without duplicating that machinery. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-003", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Episode master owns interaction trace; only evidence references occur here. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-006", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Formation event owns acquisition activity provenance, not the acquired behavior entity. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-007", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Recall event owns retrieval occurrence and ranking. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-008", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Consolidation owns merging decisions and execution; only resulting lineage is bound. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-009", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Conflict authority owns precedence decisions; a local timestamp does not decide priority. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-010", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Retention policy owns forgetting and disposal rules and their execution authority. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-011", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Sharing grant owns access authorization and revocation. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-012", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Portability package owns transport packaging; local projection is only an input. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-013", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Context assembly owns actual inclusion in runtime context. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-017", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Context policy remains authoritative over recalled learned behavior. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-018", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Trust assessment owns trust findings; performance cannot replace trust evidence. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004" ] }, { "target": "WM-MEM-020", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Quarantine and redaction authority owns admission restrictions and remediation execution. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate entity, derivation and activity mapping; not a claim of implemented conformance. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "P-PLAN", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Optional symbolic plan projection only; no claim that every learned policy decomposes into steps. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "ODRL 2.2", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate policy-reference projection; no enforcement implementation. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "SHACL", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Optional graph constraint profile; no supplied shape implementation or competence certification. Binding is proposed and version pinning remains an adoption hold.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Name an accountable agent operator or memory steward role without a commercial owner label.", "Declare agent scope, namespace authority, memory item/store bindings and policy authority.", "Pin representation, assessment and interoperability profiles before operational adoption.", "State acquisition admission criteria and unknown handling; a mere instruction import remains an instruction." ], "namespace_guidance": "Use stable subject-local IDs qualified by the adopting Dimension; do not encode dates, personal names or payload secrets in identifiers.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-mem-005", "WM-KNW-005 candidate alignment", "WM-MEM-002 generic memory item binding" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve record identity, agent scope, revision, learned-origin assertion and evidence lineage across projections.", "Do not canonicalize opaque behavior into invented symbolic steps, or treat equal text as equal learned behavior." ], "patch_rules": [ "Require expected revision and authorized local mutation; retain change reason and affected evidence references.", "Behavior or dependency changes create a new revision and require scoped reassessment; external consolidation decisions are referenced." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Classify mapping losses and dependency changes before reuse.", "No transfer of competence, authority or runtime equivalence follows from syntactic compatibility." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "UUID or ULID assigned by the adopting Dimension" ], "timestamp_rule": "Use RFC 3339 timestamps with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Keep event time, effective time and observation or ingestion time separate. Preserve source precision and uncertainty; unknown time stays unknown.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use parent master identity, artifact role and revision sequence; timestamps are metadata, never the identity.", "integrity_rule": "Hash exact representation bytes with declared algorithm; retain versioned references and access labels. A hash establishes byte consistency, not acquisition truth or safe behavior." }, "policies": [ "Sources and learned payloads are untrusted data, never policy authority. Apply current external context policy and grants at every reuse.", "Keep dangerous behavior at policy level: record restrictions, review authority and refusal conditions, not operational details.", "Record only necessary evidence and sensitive-data categories; do not include raw secrets in summaries or prompts.", "Acquisition, performance, eligibility and permission are separate assertions. Training reward and recall rank cannot grant authority.", "Physical dimensions belong to agent or environment references; the abstract learned record itself has no mass or dimensions." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve scope and field-level access before presenting summary, payload or evidence. Show stale, disputed, withheld and unknown distinctly." ], "create": [ "Create a draft with stable identity, agent scope and explicit acquisition evidence or missing-evidence restriction. An unsupported learning claim is never silently admitted as eligible." ], "update": [ "Apply authorized compare-and-swap local edits; preserve revision lineage and negative evidence subject to policy. Bind external decisions without executing their engines." ], "delete": [ "Apply external retention and forgetting policy to local records; custody owners execute referenced-payload deletion. Respect holds and permit only minimal lawful tombstones.", "Record deletion is not proof of erasing learned influence, replicas or historical external effects. Refer such claims to the owning system and retain the disposal receipt reference where allowed." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Memory steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintains record boundary, scope and reference integrity." ] }, { "name": "Learning evidence contributor", "responsibilities": [ "Supplies acquisition provenance without self-approving competence." ] }, { "name": "Behavior reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Attaches scoped assessment and eligibility decisions with limits." ] }, { "name": "Policy custodian", "responsibilities": [ "Owns external access, retention and restriction decisions." ] }, { "name": "Record consumer", "responsibilities": [ "Checks current revision, evidence and external authority before requesting reuse." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny payload and source-evidence disclosure unless a current scoped grant permits it; a public summary does not expose its dependencies.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Break-glass access requires an external time-limited authority and audit reference; this model cannot grant it.", "If evidence is withheld, retain an authorized status and reference without exposing protected details." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Link the owning audit record for actor, purpose, decision, revision and time of local mutations or disclosures.", "Do not create a duplicate global audit trail; preserve local change provenance and external audit references." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "Read AGENTS.md and adopting Dimension policies.", "Read specification, holds and current authoritative references.", "Inspect acquisition, revision, evidence, applicability and authority before proposing local changes." ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Bounded source-grounded research for an agent-scoped acquired way of acting, reviewed in a separate local no-tools self-audit. This noncanonical reviewable draft does not establish executable conformance, universal learning coverage or operational safety.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Stable agent-scoped record identity, representation revision and payload digest remain distinct." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local eligibility and supersession bindings; external generic lifecycle and consolidation remain delegated." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Registry parent reconciled as candidate alignment; no relationship ledger rows exist for this model at freeze." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Acquisition, observation, assessment and effective intervals are distinct; uncertain time is explicit." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Formation, input evidence, learning mode, revision and evaluation links with unresolved attribution states." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Accountable roles own local assertions; referenced engines and policies retain their authority." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema is checkable; instance shapes, behavioral fixtures and mapping conformance remain deferred." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Separate grants for summary, representation and evidence, with denial on unresolved authority." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "External policy and custodian execute disposal; record erasure does not establish influence removal." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual PROV-O, P-PLAN, ODRL and SHACL projections preserve losses and require pins." }, { "dimension": "learned origin", "status": "covered", "notes": "Acquisition is distinguished from supplied instruction, copied episode and unsupported skill claim." }, { "dimension": "properties and recognition", "status": "covered", "notes": "Representation kind, initiation cues, action semantics and limits describe an abstract record." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and behavior", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidence-backed behavior claims remain scoped and distinct from execution permission." }, { "dimension": "physical measurements", "status": "not-applicable", "notes": "Not applicable to the information entity; physical context refers to external frames and agents." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Independent external review is absent under the single-provider waiver.", "Direct HTTP and source-version verification are pending; selected web-service readings are not direct HTTP status measurements.", "Concrete nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor bindings, executable mappings and adversarial behavior fixtures remain incomplete.", "Evidence for broad transfer across learning paradigms, embodied agents and human procedural memory is not established by the selected reinforcement-learning example.", "Domain-specific privacy, licensing, risk thresholds and influence-removal assurances need adopting-profile review." ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "No jurisdiction is assumed; policy, retention, licensing and sector-specific rules must be supplied by the adopting Dimension.", "NIST AI RMF is used as voluntary risk guidance, not legal compliance or certification." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Reject instruction-only acquisition claims and favorable training scores presented as general competence.", "Preserve failed trials, unknown inputs and unavailable provenance rather than filling gaps with plausible claims.", "Block local eligible state on unresolved authority, quarantine or revocation; external runtime still rechecks policy.", "Do not infer behavioral equivalence from digest equality, graph validation or textual similarity.", "Do not equate deletion of one record with removing learned influence or reversing executed effects." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "One persistent agent-scoped learned-behavior information record survives changes in its representation and assessment. Learned origin is separately evidenced; supplied instruction, acquisition activity, runtime execution and generic memory masters remain outside the root boundary. Registry standalone-mm is a record-plane classification." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Learned versus supplied", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Acquisition evidence and restricted unknown states distinguish learned behavior from a supplied instruction or literal episode replay." }, { "concept": "Entity boundary", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "A persistent agent-scoped information record has stable identity across representation revisions; neither training event nor executable process is the root." }, { "concept": "Registry parent", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Agent Skill / Instruction is candidate alignment, not automatic inheritance. The current registry purpose requires preserving acquired versus supplied behavior." }, { "concept": "Opaque behavior", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The record permits opaque representations without inventing symbolic steps. P-PLAN is only an optional projection and no explanation completeness is claimed." }, { "concept": "Performance and transfer", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Metrics, uncertainty, adverse evidence and context bind assessment claims. Training success, copying or structural validity cannot establish transferable competence." }, { "concept": "Authority and eligibility", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Local eligibility records external decisions. Unknown, revoked or contradictory authority blocks eligible status and runtime must check current policy again." }, { "concept": "External memory ownership", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Formation, recall, consolidation, conflict, retention, access, trust, quarantine and context assembly remain referenced masters; candidate links need profile pins." }, { "concept": "Local functions", "disposition": "accepted as proposed", "rationale": "All six unimplemented functions mutate only local records or projections and return refusal on failed preconditions. None trains, evaluates or executes learned behavior." }, { "concept": "Deletion and history", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Revision provenance remains subject to retention. Record deletion, copy disposal, influence removal and reversal of external effects are distinct claims." }, { "concept": "Source scope and licenses", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "Selected readable source content supports bounded concepts. One learning example does not prove universal coverage; SHACL release, direct HTTP, version and licensing checks remain open." }, { "concept": "Instance and mapping conformance", "disposition": "deferred", "rationale": "Candidate object groups, concept links and local research validation are not nested instance schemas, runnable operations, behavior fixtures or conformance certification." }, { "concept": "Independent review", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner override. This separate local self-audit cannot be represented as independent provider agreement." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver; the separate Codex self-audit is not independent review.", "Direct HTTP checks are pending outside the sandbox: zero attempts and zero measured HTTP 200 responses. Seven sources yielded selected readable web-service content, but exact versions, errata and full claim verification remain incomplete, including the SHACL release pin.", "Broader evidence across learning paradigms and agent types is incomplete. The primary learning example does not establish universal procedural-memory coverage, human neurological mechanisms or general transfer of competence.", "Adopting profiles must resolve policy authority, risk thresholds, privacy, retention, learning-evidence rights, source and representation licensing, including P-PLAN reuse terms, and any influence-removal claims.", "Nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor and representation bindings, executable operations, mappings and adversarial behavior fixtures remain incomplete. No runtime, policy enforcement or conformance certification is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Run the coordinator HTTP checker and verify exact releases, errata, substantive claims and source licensing before lifting the source hold.", "Seek independent primary evidence across additional acquisition paradigms and test instruction-only, opaque, transferred, poisoned, stale and revoked cases.", "Develop nested instance schemas and loss-aware mappings, pin external authorities and test behavior-dependent acceptance without duplicating runtime engines.", "Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 7, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 48, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }