# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T22:35:33Z", "synthesisSha256": "8da23b2439d7d66b1e224405a2258880abd0f8efd78f49d4c75c684838dea76e", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-OBJ-016", "registryId": "vr.wm-obj-016", "name": "Cultural Artifact", "version": "0.3.0-reviewable-draft", "previousVersions": [ { "version": "0.2.0-legacy", "url": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/blob/feat/mega-model-registry/models/matter-artifacts/M9-cultural-artifact-and-heritage.md" } ], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Physical world and living systems", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ.HER" ], "tags": [ "cultural", "artifact", "phy.obj.her" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-obj-016-cultural-artifact/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-obj-016", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-obj-016", "model_id": "WM-OBJ-016", "name": "Cultural Artifact", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Describe one physical cultural artifact and its attributed significance, history, care and governed documentary context.", "scope_statement": "One bounded, movable physical object made or materially modified through human activity, with asserted or under-review cultural significance. A functional set can have an explicit aggregate identity, while independently tracked members retain their own identifiers. This is a proposed documentation model, not a museum collection, intangible tradition, legal title or digital image. Accession, formal designation and a known owner are not prerequisites.", "in_scope": [ "Physical identity, component references, recognition observations, materials, measurements and uncertain classifications", "Attributed significance, maker and origin hypotheses, provenance episodes, separate title and custody assertions", "Condition, care records, object lifecycle, protection and claim references, restricted disclosure and digital surrogates" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Immovable sites and monuments, intangible practices, born-digital works and unmodified natural specimens as root subjects; detached objects and culturally significant manufactured objects can be included", "Collection-wide administration, actor and place masters, rights instruments, legal proceedings, conservation procedures and transport operations", "Authentication certification, valuation engines, title adjudication, sale, export, seizure, restitution execution or physical treatment; dangerous or controlled artifacts receive policy-level description only" ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "WM-OBJ-001 Physical Item Instance", "distinction": "Candidate alignment of physical instance identity, not automatic inherited conformance. Cultural interpretation and qualified history extend the research surface; no second physical master is created.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "neighbor": "Physical collection, set and component", "distinction": "A documented set may be one root only under an explicit identity policy. Membership is not physical containment; detachments and separately identified parts remain linked objects. Do not silently merge accession numbers.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "neighbor": "Ownership, custody and rights records", "distinction": "Holding an object or maintaining its catalogue does not establish title, authority to transfer it, or rights to publish its images. Each assertion retains parties, basis, period and uncertainty.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Digital resource and information work", "distinction": "A photograph, scan, catalogue revision or depicted work has an identity and rights separate from the object. The research schema term artifact below denotes a documentary evidence artifact.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] }, { "neighbor": "Legacy M9 and unreviewed card supplement", "distinction": "Legacy custody cardinality, loan semantics, exclusive heritage-rights claims and conformance assertions are not inherited. Movable scope is a local profile choice, not the complete scope of CIDOC CRM or treaty cultural property.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "Classes and Properties Declarations of CIDOC CRM", "organization": "ICOM CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group", "url": "https://cidoc-crm.org/html/cidoc_crm_v7.1.3.html", "version_or_date": "7.1.3; selected class and property declarations", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "E22 physical object boundary; E8 title and E10 custody; E13 assertions, E3 condition, material and part relationships. Conceptual alignment, not equivalence or conformance." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "LIDO - Lightweight Information Describing Objects", "organization": "ICOM CIDOC LIDO Working Group", "url": "https://lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1.html", "version_or_date": "1.1, published 2021-12-20", "source_type": "schema", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Selected object, actor, event, date, relation, resource and rights structures inform exchange references. A metadata record and its images are not the physical object." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Object ID", "organization": "International Council of Museums", "url": "https://icom.museum/en/resources/standards-guidelines/objectid/", "version_or_date": "Official overview accessed 2026-10-07; no revision number displayed", "source_type": "first-party-doc", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Identification categories and secure documentation support descriptive recognition. Neither photographs nor a checklist authenticate an object or establish title." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "Introduction to Spectrum", "organization": "Collections Trust", "url": "https://collectionstrust.org.uk/spectrum/spectrum-5/", "version_or_date": "Spectrum 5.1, September 2022, as identified on the overview", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Collection procedures distinguish entry, accession, movements, loans, use, care and disposal. This overview supports process boundaries, not full implementation of all procedures." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Condition checking and technical assessment - the Spectrum standard", "organization": "Collections Trust", "url": "https://collectionstrust.org.uk/resource/condition-checking-and-technical-assessment-the-spectrum-standard/", "version_or_date": "Official resource dated 2022, within Spectrum 5.1", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Condition records link object numbers, assessor, date and reason; triggers, competence and destructive sampling are policy decisions. No treatment recipe is derived." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property", "organization": "UNESCO", "url": "https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/convention-means-prohibiting-and-preventing-illicit-import-export-and-transfer-ownership-cultural", "version_or_date": "Adopted 1970-11-14; selected Articles 1, 3, 5 and 6", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Treaty-specific cultural property categories, designation and export controls motivate qualified legal references. No universal age threshold, title determination or domestic-law applicability is asserted." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation, 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Entity, activity, agent, derivation and revision relations support evidence lineage. Provenance of an assertion does not establish its truth." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums", "organization": "International Council of Museums", "url": "https://icom.museum/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/ICOM-Code-of-Ethics-for-Museums_2026_EN.pdf", "version_or_date": "Adopted 2026-06-25; selected S.3, S.6 and C.1-C.10", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T22:34:12Z", "relevance": "Professional guidance on community participation, sensitive material, documentation, provenance and returns supports proposed governance questions. Institutional policies and applicable law remain necessary." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "bundle-object", "name": "Object identity and physical description", "description": "Identify the bounded object and record observations.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-identity", "name": "Object identity and recognition", "description": "Separate the object from its labels, catalogue records, replicas and type. Unknown accession and uncertain matches remain explicit.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-identity", "name": "Object identity and recognition", "description": "Separate the object from its labels, catalogue records, replicas and type. Unknown accession and uncertain matches remain explicit.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-identity-q1", "text": "Which master identifier identifies this object and which earlier identifiers remain aliases?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "master namespace", "object identifier", "alias issuer", "match standing" ] }, { "id": "finding-identity-q2", "text": "What supports its inclusion as a cultural artifact rather than a site, natural specimen or digital resource?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "object kind", "scope assessment", "significance status", "exclusion reason" ] }, { "id": "finding-identity-q3", "text": "Which observations distinguish this object from a copy or another similar object?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "marks", "images", "observer", "observation time", "matching uncertainty" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-identity-data1", "name": "Object identifier", "description": "Namespace-qualified stable identifier independent of accession and custody.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "finding-identity-data2", "name": "Identifier aliases", "description": "Prior catalogue numbers with issuer, period and asserted equivalence.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "finding-identity-data3", "name": "Recognition observations", "description": "Distinguishing marks, image references, limitations and reviewed match status.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-identity-evidence", "name": "Identification dossier", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for object identity and recognition. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-physical", "name": "Physical description and component boundary", "description": "Record measured or inferred material properties separately from assembly membership. Measurement context and incomplete observations remain visible.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-physical", "name": "Physical description and component boundary", "description": "Record measured or inferred material properties separately from assembly membership. Measurement context and incomplete observations remain visible.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-physical-q1", "text": "Which dimensions and material observations apply to which parts, with what units and uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "part reference", "value", "unit", "method", "conditions", "uncertainty", "observation time" ] }, { "id": "finding-physical-q2", "text": "Which components belong to this object, and which have independent identities or disputed membership?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "component identifier", "relation type", "period", "membership evidence", "boundary decision" ] }, { "id": "finding-physical-q3", "text": "What descriptions, techniques, inscriptions and depicted subjects are recorded in their original language?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "description", "language", "transcription", "technique claim", "subject reference" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-physical-data1", "name": "Measurements", "description": "Repeated quantity observations including units, extent, method and precision.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "finding-physical-data2", "name": "Materials and techniques", "description": "Qualified material and technique assertions, with evidence and external vocabulary references.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "finding-physical-data3", "name": "Component relations", "description": "Typed part, set membership and separation assertions with effective periods.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-physical-evidence", "name": "Physical description record", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for physical description and component boundary. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-interpretation", "name": "Interpretation and attribution", "description": "Preserve contextual and contested knowledge.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-significance", "name": "Significance and interpretation", "description": "Cultural value is an attributed assessment, potentially plural and contested. A legal designation and an interpretation are different assertions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-significance", "name": "Significance and interpretation", "description": "Cultural value is an attributed assessment, potentially plural and contested. A legal designation and an interpretation are different assertions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-significance-q1", "text": "Who contributed each significance assessment and under what mandate or community relationship?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "assessor reference", "community reference", "mandate", "consent basis" ] }, { "id": "finding-significance-q2", "text": "Which evidence and criteria support each interpretation and which perspectives remain disputed or absent?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "criteria", "support", "contrary view", "uncertainty", "missing perspective" ] }, { "id": "finding-significance-q3", "text": "When was an interpretation recorded, and to which historical period or context does it refer?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "recorded time", "historical interval", "calendar", "precision", "context" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-significance-data1", "name": "Assessments", "description": "Attributable significance statements with method, standing and evidence.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-significance-data2", "name": "Community references", "description": "Governed references to relevant communities without claiming one exclusive voice.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-significance-data3", "name": "Interpretive context", "description": "Historical context, source language and qualified time expressions.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-significance-evidence", "name": "Significance assessment", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for significance and interpretation. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-attribution", "name": "Maker, origin and dating hypotheses", "description": "Keep competing hypotheses and their basis without replacing uncertainty with a single asserted maker or exact date.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-attribution", "name": "Maker, origin and dating hypotheses", "description": "Keep competing hypotheses and their basis without replacing uncertainty with a single asserted maker or exact date.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-attribution-q1", "text": "What evidence supports each maker, production place or dating hypothesis?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "claim subject", "claim value", "source", "researcher", "method" ] }, { "id": "finding-attribution-q2", "text": "Which attribution is preferred for this catalogue view and who approved that presentation?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "selected claim", "reviewer", "decision basis", "view revision", "remaining dissent" ] }, { "id": "finding-attribution-q3", "text": "How are anonymous makers, collective production, uncertain dates and later alterations represented?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "unknown reason", "actor roles", "date interval", "precision", "alteration references" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-attribution-data1", "name": "Attribution claims", "description": "Maker, place or date propositions with confidence, standing and contrary evidence.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "finding-attribution-data2", "name": "Preferred presentation", "description": "Revisable view selection that does not delete competing claims.", "value_kind": "reference", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "finding-attribution-data3", "name": "Production context", "description": "Event and actor references with roles, uncertain chronology and place.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-attribution-evidence", "name": "Attribution research record", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for maker, origin and dating hypotheses. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-history", "name": "History and holding", "description": "Distinguish provenance, title, custody and movement.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-history", "name": "Provenance episodes and title assertions", "description": "Object history and record derivation are distinct. Document gaps, disputed transfers and title claims without certifying lawful acquisition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-history", "name": "Provenance episodes and title assertions", "description": "Object history and record derivation are distinct. Document gaps, disputed transfers and title claims without certifying lawful acquisition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-history-q1", "text": "Which parties claim or held title during each interval, and what evidence qualifies the claim?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "party reference", "title basis", "effective interval", "claim standing", "evidence" ] }, { "id": "finding-history-q2", "text": "Which making, discovery, transfer and loss episodes are documented, inferred or missing?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "episode type", "event reference", "time precision", "source", "gap description" ] }, { "id": "finding-history-q3", "text": "Which provenance inconsistencies require review before a proposed acquisition or transfer is considered?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "inconsistency", "due diligence evidence", "review status", "responsible role" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-history-data1", "name": "History episodes", "description": "Referenced events with type, parties, location sensitivity and uncertain time.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-history-data2", "name": "Title assertions", "description": "Independently evidenced ownership claims; custody is never substituted.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-history-data3", "name": "Provenance gaps", "description": "Explicit unknown or disputed intervals and outstanding research.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-history-evidence", "name": "Provenance and title dossier", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for provenance episodes and title assertions. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-custody", "name": "Custody, location and loan references", "description": "Custody can be unknown, shared or contested. Loan agreements and actual receipt or return events are separate evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-custody", "name": "Custody, location and loan references", "description": "Custody can be unknown, shared or contested. Loan agreements and actual receipt or return events are separate evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-custody-q1", "text": "What location or location class is last evidenced, when was it observed, and who may see it?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "location reference", "observation time", "precision", "disclosure class" ] }, { "id": "finding-custody-q2", "text": "Which custodian assertions and loan agreements apply without implying ownership?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "custodian reference", "basis", "period", "loan reference", "contested standing" ] }, { "id": "finding-custody-q3", "text": "Which receipt, movement or return evidence changes the documented custody state?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "event reference", "from and to role", "effective time", "recorded time", "unresolved discrepancy" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-custody-data1", "name": "Custody assertions", "description": "Zero or more qualified claims, including shared or conflicting custody.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "finding-custody-data2", "name": "Location observations", "description": "Restricted observations with precision, source and freshness.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "finding-custody-data3", "name": "Loan references", "description": "Agreement and event links with planned and actual dates separated.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-custody-evidence", "name": "Custody evidence record", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for custody, location and loan references. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-care", "name": "Condition and care", "description": "Separate observed state, policy and object lifecycle.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-condition", "name": "Condition and observation limits", "description": "Condition is a dated observation with extent and competence, not an enduring guarantee of fitness.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-condition", "name": "Condition and observation limits", "description": "Condition is a dated observation with extent and competence, not an enduring guarantee of fitness.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-condition-q1", "text": "What condition was observed for each assessed portion and what could not be examined?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "condition statement", "part", "limitations", "observer", "time" ] }, { "id": "finding-condition-q2", "text": "What triggered this condition check and which qualified role performed it?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "trigger", "role", "competence reference", "method", "linked procedure" ] }, { "id": "finding-condition-q3", "text": "How does the observation compare with prior records and which differences require review?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "baseline revision", "difference", "evidence", "uncertainty", "review referral" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-condition-data1", "name": "Condition observations", "description": "Scoped condition assertions with date, observer and examination limits.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "finding-condition-data2", "name": "Check trigger", "description": "Reason for assessment and reference to a policy or event.", "value_kind": "text", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "finding-condition-data3", "name": "Comparison evidence", "description": "Prior observations, differences and pending specialist review.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-condition-evidence", "name": "Condition report", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for condition and observation limits. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-care", "name": "Care constraints and lifecycle continuity", "description": "Record authorized care and lifecycle evidence without performing treatment. Deaccession, loss, destruction and record retirement are different events.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-care", "name": "Care constraints and lifecycle continuity", "description": "Record authorized care and lifecycle evidence without performing treatment. Deaccession, loss, destruction and record retirement are different events.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-care-q1", "text": "Which approved care, access or sampling constraints apply and where is the specialist policy held?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "policy reference", "approver", "scope", "effective interval", "exception" ] }, { "id": "finding-care-q2", "text": "Which events indicate alteration, loss, recovery, destruction or removal from a collection?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "event type", "event evidence", "object continuity decision", "collection relation" ] }, { "id": "finding-care-q3", "text": "What evidence records approval and outcome of a proposed or completed intervention?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "proposal reference", "authorization", "specialist record", "actual outcome", "follow-up need" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-care-data1", "name": "Care policy references", "description": "Approved constraints and competence requirements, without treatment instructions.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-care-data2", "name": "Intervention records", "description": "Links distinguishing proposed, authorized and performed care with uncertainties.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-care-data3", "name": "Lifecycle assertions", "description": "Evidence of object continuity or loss and separately governed collection membership.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-care-evidence", "name": "Care and lifecycle record", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for care constraints and lifecycle continuity. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-governance", "name": "Protection and disclosure", "description": "Qualify legal claims and audience-specific access.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-protection", "name": "Designation, restrictions and return claims", "description": "Record jurisdiction-qualified protection and claim references. Absence of a listing or a local flag never grants permission to trade, export or dispose.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-protection", "name": "Designation, restrictions and return claims", "description": "Record jurisdiction-qualified protection and claim references. Absence of a listing or a local flag never grants permission to trade, export or dispose.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-protection-q1", "text": "Which authority, instrument and jurisdiction support each designation or restriction?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "authority reference", "instrument version", "jurisdiction", "effective dates", "applicability review" ] }, { "id": "finding-protection-q2", "text": "What permit or decision evidence must a qualified reviewer assess for a proposed action?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "action category", "applicable profile", "permit reference", "review outcome", "unknown requirements" ] }, { "id": "finding-protection-q3", "text": "What is the recorded status of a restitution or return request and which external decision supports it?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "claim reference", "requesting role", "status", "decision reference", "disputed basis" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-protection-data1", "name": "Protection assertions", "description": "Dated designations and restrictions with legal basis and review standing.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-protection-data2", "name": "Permit references", "description": "References only; this model cannot issue or verify legal permission.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-protection-data3", "name": "Return claim references", "description": "Separately mastered claims and decisions, with unresolved status preserved.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-protection-evidence", "name": "Protection and claim register", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for designation, restrictions and return claims. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-disclosure", "name": "Community protocols and controlled disclosure", "description": "The adopting profile defines consent, confidentiality and access decisions per audience. Record control does not imply unrestricted authority over community knowledge.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure", "name": "Community protocols and controlled disclosure", "description": "The adopting profile defines consent, confidentiality and access decisions per audience. Record control does not imply unrestricted authority over community knowledge.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure-q1", "text": "Which audiences may access each description, image and location detail under the applicable policy?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "audience", "data scope", "purpose", "policy reference", "decision expiry" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-q2", "text": "What community consent, cultural protocols or personal-data restrictions constrain recording and disclosure?", "kind": "privacy", "answer_data": [ "community protocol", "consent scope", "personal data category", "legal basis", "review role" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-q3", "text": "How is a disputed disclosure request escalated while a restricted projection remains available?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "request reference", "conflict", "responsible reviewer", "redaction decision", "appeal route" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure-data1", "name": "Disclosure policy bindings", "description": "Scope-specific audience, purpose, basis and validity.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-data2", "name": "Consent and protocol references", "description": "Restricted evidence of applicable community agreements and review.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-data3", "name": "Access decisions", "description": "Reasoned, time-bounded decisions with denied fields and review route.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure-evidence", "name": "Disclosure decision record", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for community protocols and controlled disclosure. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-documentation", "name": "Representations and record continuity", "description": "Govern surrogates, revisions and proposed exchange.", "rationale": "A local documentation concern with primary-source alignment; instance rules require an adopting profile.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-resources", "name": "Digital surrogates and distinct rights", "description": "The depicted object, resource file and catalogue record remain separately identified. Rights statements are qualified references, not automatic reuse permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-resources", "name": "Digital surrogates and distinct rights", "description": "The depicted object, resource file and catalogue record remain separately identified. Rights statements are qualified references, not automatic reuse permission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-resources-q1", "text": "Which object, view and capture event does each digital surrogate represent?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "object reference", "resource identifier", "capture event", "representation type", "replica indicator" ] }, { "id": "finding-resources-q2", "text": "Which rights statements apply separately to the object, image and metadata record?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "rights target", "rights holder reference", "licence or basis", "period", "review status" ] }, { "id": "finding-resources-q3", "text": "What distinguishes an original capture from an edited image or generated reconstruction?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "derivation chain", "creator", "method", "source revision", "integrity digest", "disclosure label" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-resources-data1", "name": "Resource references", "description": "Persistent resource identities, relation to object and representation extent.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-resources-data2", "name": "Rights bindings", "description": "Target-specific rights references with unresolved or disputed standing.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "finding-resources-data3", "name": "Derivation records", "description": "Capture and transformation references with integrity information.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-resources-evidence", "name": "Resource and rights manifest", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for digital surrogates and distinct rights. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-continuity", "name": "Record revision and exchange continuity", "description": "Keep object identity stable through catalogue corrections and exchange. Mappings are proposed and must report loss of uncertainty, restrictions or history.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-continuity", "name": "Record revision and exchange continuity", "description": "Keep object identity stable through catalogue corrections and exchange. Mappings are proposed and must report loss of uncertainty, restrictions or history.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-continuity-q1", "text": "Which pinned exchange profile maps these fields and what information is omitted or transformed?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "profile version", "field mapping", "loss report", "validation evidence" ] }, { "id": "finding-continuity-q2", "text": "Which revision supplied the displayed assertion and how are event, observation and recording times distinguished?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "assertion revision", "event interval", "observation time", "recorded time", "supersession" ] }, { "id": "finding-continuity-q3", "text": "Which retention rule governs obsolete evidence and what minimal reference survives lawful erasure?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "record category", "retention basis", "hold", "authorized disposition", "minimal tombstone" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "finding-continuity-data1", "name": "Record revision", "description": "Immutable revision identifier linked to stable object identity and prior revision.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "finding-continuity-data2", "name": "Exchange profile", "description": "Pinned proposed binding and machine-validation result when available.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "finding-continuity-data3", "name": "Disposition controls", "description": "Schedule, active holds and authorized redaction or erasure decisions.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "finding-continuity-evidence", "name": "Revision and exchange manifest", "description": "Versioned documentary evidence for record revision and exchange continuity. Carries object reference, author, recorded time, evidence references, uncertainty and disclosure classification; it is not the physical cultural artifact.", "media_or_form": [ "Structured record", "Document or governed external reference" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative record master identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension UUID or ULID third. Bind the subject object and immutable revision separately. A date, filename or content hash alone is not identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "function-identify", "name": "Record identity proposal", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Associate evidence with a candidate object without automatic deduplication.", "inputs": [ "Namespace-qualified identifier", "Recognition evidence", "Candidate alias" ], "outputs": [ "Identity proposal and match standing", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Independent objects and copies must not be merged on a shared title or photograph" ], "effects": [ "Preserve unresolved matches and alias issuer history", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "function-assert", "name": "Add qualified research assertion", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Append attributed significance, attribution or history assertions.", "inputs": [ "Claim and scope", "Source and actor references", "Uncertainty and contrary evidence" ], "outputs": [ "Versioned assertion", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Evidence accessible to authorized reviewer; unknown is allowed but fabricated certainty is not" ], "effects": [ "Preserve competing claims and distinguish source support from authenticity", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "function-holding", "name": "Record holding evidence", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Link a custody or loan event without making a physical transfer.", "inputs": [ "Custody claim", "Agreement or event reference", "Effective and recorded time" ], "outputs": [ "Updated holding projection", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Classify title and custody separately; conflicting holders require review" ], "effects": [ "Retain disputed or unknown custody and last-observed location freshness", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004" ] }, { "id": "function-condition", "name": "Record condition assessment", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Attach a specialist observation and refer concerns for review.", "inputs": [ "Condition evidence", "Assessor and scope", "Trigger and prior revision" ], "outputs": [ "Condition comparison and care referral", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Relevant competence documented; sampling and treatment authorizations stay external" ], "effects": [ "Record examination limits and requested follow-up; no physical treatment performed", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "function-review", "name": "Register protection or claim review", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Record a qualified reviewer decision with its external instrument.", "inputs": [ "Restriction or claim reference", "Jurisdiction profile", "Reviewer evidence" ], "outputs": [ "Review record and unresolved requirements", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Reviewer mandate and instrument version stated; missing legal facts block an affirmative operational conclusion" ], "effects": [ "Record status only; no title adjudication, permit issuance or restitution execution", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "function-project", "name": "Prepare governed catalogue projection", "description": "Proposed local operation; not implemented. Create a local audience-specific projection and exchange loss report.", "inputs": [ "Audience and purpose", "Record revision", "Rights and disclosure bindings", "Pinned mapping" ], "outputs": [ "Filtered projection", "Mapping and redaction report", "Refusal or unresolved-review report" ], "preconditions": [ "Authorized role, stated purpose, resolved object identifier and expected record revision", "Unresolved access or reuse authority suppresses affected payload; sensitive source cannot be exposed through metadata" ], "effects": [ "Keep object, resource and record identities distinct; no external publication or rights grant", "Write a scoped local revision or return refusal without external action" ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-OBJ-001", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate physical instance alignment from legacy M2; same object master, no untested inheritance.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "target": "WM-MAT-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Chemical substance references where applicable; legacy M1 is not a universal materials classifier.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-MAT-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Optional engineered-material grade reference where the artifact description requires it.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-PER-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Person identity for makers, researchers or claimants remains externally mastered.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Custodian or authority organization references do not imply ownership or competence.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "Adopting profile place authority", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Resolve production, find and observation locations to a pinned place authority. Legacy P1 now denotes Terrain / Landform and cannot be silently reused as generic place.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "CIDOC CRM 7.1.3", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Conceptual physical-object, assertion, title and custody alignment; mappings and instance conformance unimplemented.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001" ] }, { "target": "LIDO 1.1", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate metadata exchange binding; preserve restrictions and report lossy projection.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002" ] }, { "target": "Spectrum 5.1", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Collection procedure references without embedding a collections-management runtime.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "PROV-O 2013 Recommendation", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Evidence derivation and attribution links distinct from object ownership history.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Adopting Dimension identifies the accountable record steward by role and authority, separately from object title and custody.", "Bind namespace, storage, interface and process endpoints to governed identities before instance use.", "Declare collection policy, community protocol, legal profile, access rules and retention authority; no company or brand is assigned as owner." ], "namespace_guidance": "Use a governed cultural-artifact namespace; keep object, assertion, evidence artifact and revision identifiers distinct. Namespace control is not cultural or legal ownership.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-obj-016", "WM-OBJ-001 candidate alignment", "WM-PER-001 and WM-ORG-001 external identities" ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "This is a noncanonical reviewable draft under a single-provider waiver. Canonical promotion requires independent review and closure of all holds.", "Retain original language, attributed labels, units and uncertain historical dates; normalized labels are searchable projections, not overwrites." ], "patch_rules": [ "Patch with expected revision, authority, purpose and evidence; append superseding assertions while preserving dissent under lawful retention.", "A change of object boundary, split or merge requires explicit reviewed identity links; a catalogue edit cannot change physical custody or title." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Pin neighboring model and vocabulary versions in an adoption profile.", "Report semantic loss in migrations, especially uncertainty, rights, aliases, time precision and restricted fields." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier with namespace", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID" ], "timestamp_rule": "Operational timestamps use RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Separate event time, observation time and ingestion time. Historical dates retain calendar, interval, precision and uncertainty without fabricated midnight instants.", "serial_naming_rule": "Evidence artifacts use stable master IDs and revision IDs; descriptive filenames and dates are display metadata only.", "integrity_rule": "Hash immutable evidence bytes where available and retain algorithm, source and revision; a digest does not establish authenticity, lawful title or consent. Redacted derivatives have their own identities and lineage." }, "policies": [ "No automatic acquisition, export, sale, physical intervention or restitution; record the competent external authority and decision. Dangerous or controlled objects remain at policy level.", "Community-sensitive content and exact locations require purpose-specific review. Rights to the object, resource and record are distinct.", "Do not erase adverse provenance to improve title appearance. Preserve evidence lawfully, reconcile privacy and community restrictions with retention duties, and document permitted redaction." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve object and revision, purpose and audience; return permitted fields with uncertainty and freshness; restrict existence metadata if it leaks protected knowledge." ], "create": [ "Check namespace and potential duplicates; allow unaccessioned objects, unknown maker and unknown custody; record the evidence basis for scope inclusion." ], "update": [ "Use optimistic concurrency and attributed patches; keep actual events separate from intended actions and permit contrary claims." ], "delete": [ "Record deaccession or object destruction as events, not catalogue deletion. The adopting Dimension retention authority executes record erasure only after schedule, legal hold and community/privacy review. Retain only lawful minimal tombstones and reference continuity; redact or erase protected payload and replicas according to that policy." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Record steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain object identity, revision control and profile bindings; no implied title." ] }, { "name": "Researcher", "responsibilities": [ "Record qualified assertions and contrary evidence within access scope." ] }, { "name": "Collections registrar", "responsibilities": [ "Link custody, loans and collection events with evidence; refer unresolved discrepancies." ] }, { "name": "Conservation specialist", "responsibilities": [ "Assess condition and approve domain care records within competence." ] }, { "name": "Community liaison", "responsibilities": [ "Document representation, consent and cultural protocols without assuming one voice." ] }, { "name": "Legal and protection reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Assess jurisdiction-specific instruments and return claims; maintain external decision references." ] }, { "name": "Access and retention officer", "responsibilities": [ "Approve scoped projections and lawful disposition; audit sensitive access." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Authenticated least-privilege access for working evidence. Public catalogue access requires an approved, filtered projection; uncertainty and review holds remain visible.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Community agreements, privacy rules, sensitive materials and security may restrict even catalogue metadata; explicit legal disclosure requires qualified review and minimization.", "Research purpose or custodian role alone does not authorize unrestricted imagery, location or claimant disclosure." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record role, purpose, policy revision, object/revision and fields disclosed or withheld; protect audit payload and apply its retention schedule.", "Log denied access and reviewed exceptions without copying restricted knowledge into public logs." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL" ], "read_order": [ "AGENTS.md and adopting Dimension policies", "spec.yaml and publication holds", "Pinned neighbor profiles and source/evidence records before scoped operations" ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed documentation structure for one movable physical cultural artifact, including qualified interpretation, history, care and controlled representations. Separate frozen no-tools local self-audit completed. Independent review, direct source verification, adopting profiles and executable conformance remain holds. This is a noncanonical reviewable draft, not authentication, title certification or authority to perform physical or legal actions.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Master identity, aliases, copies and functional sets have explicit boundaries." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Object events, collection membership, treatment and record retirement are distinct." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Parts, actors, custody, claims and surrogates retain separate identities." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Uncertain historical intervals differ from observed and recorded timestamps." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Object history and assertion lineage retain gaps and contradictory evidence." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Title, holding, rights, record stewardship and community interests are separate." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema gate only; nested instance constraints, mappings and adversarial fixtures remain unimplemented." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Audience-specific projections, community protocols and denial rules." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Lawful disposition with holds and minimal tombstones; no perpetual personal-data assumption." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "Conceptual CRM, LIDO, Spectrum and PROV alignment; executable conformance and pinned neighbors pending." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Material, dimensions, techniques, markings and component observations are qualified." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Evidence-based match proposals do not authenticate objects or establish ownership." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and hazards", "status": "covered", "notes": "Six local documentary operations with refusal outcomes; physical and legal actions remain external." }, { "dimension": "context and evidence", "status": "covered", "notes": "Attribution, community, legal and collection context carry basis and uncertainty." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Independent external review is absent; the separate local Codex audit cannot replace it.", "Direct HTTP source checks are not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction; browser text retrieval is not measured endpoint status or a completeness claim.", "Detailed nested instance schemas, validation fixtures, retention schedules and language/vocabulary profiles remain adoption work.", "Jurisdiction-specific designation, export, privacy, copyright, claims and special material rules need qualified review; no legal-compliance claim is made.", "Immovable heritage, born-digital works, intangible traditions and unmodified specimens require sibling profiles. Detached objects and human-containing artifacts require specialized cultural and legal review.", "Detailed treatment, emergency response, valuation, insurance and transport execution are delegated; no procedural safety recipes are provided.", "Local material and place bindings need reconciliation; legacy M1 and P1 labels cannot be mechanically mapped to current registry meanings." ], "conflicts": [], "regional_assumptions": [ "Movable human-made scope is a declared local boundary, narrower than treaty cultural property or all CRM physical things.", "Spectrum is a UK collections standard with wider use; treaty membership, domestic implementation and museum ethics applicability must be reviewed for each adopter." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "An accession number, photograph, hash or catalogue entry does not establish authenticity or title.", "A loan can change physical custody without transferring title; missing custody is not invalid merely because the legacy card expected one holder.", "Restitution request, decision and actual return are separate; local record mutation performs none of them.", "An approximate historical date must not acquire invented RFC 3339 precision.", "A redacted projection must not leak restricted location or community knowledge through identifiers, logs or derived images.", "Do not infer generic place or universal material semantics from legacy aliases." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "The persistent physical object remains the root across catalogue revisions, interpretations, custody and condition changes. A functional set needs an explicit identity policy and separately identified members; it does not make the entire collections or rights domain the root. Movable human-made scope is a declared local profile narrower than treaty cultural property and broader heritage. Registry standalone-mm is a record-plane classification rather than this subject-kind enum." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Physical root and cultural scope", "disposition": "accepted with declared profile", "rationale": "The scope permits under-review significance without requiring formal designation or accession. Sites, intangible practices, born-digital roots and unmodified natural specimens are excluded explicitly. The profile is not presented as a universal definition of cultural property." }, { "concept": "Accession, recognition and authenticity", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Master identity and issuer-qualified aliases are distinct from titles, photographs and copies. Recognition proposals and hashes cannot authenticate an object, resolve duplicates automatically or prove lawful title." }, { "concept": "Functional sets and component identity", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Component and membership relations have periods and evidence rather than a universal one-parent limit. A reviewed identity policy must govern whether a set is one root and how separation affects separately identified members." }, { "concept": "Title, custody and loan semantics", "disposition": "legacy restrictions rejected", "rationale": "The proposed result permits zero known, shared and disputed custody assertions. Title, loan agreement, movement, receipt and return evidence are distinct. The legacy single-custodian constraint and claim that loans never transfer custody are not admitted." }, { "concept": "Attribution, significance and contrary evidence", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "Attributed claims preserve support, dissent and missing perspectives. Selecting a catalogue presentation changes a view, not the underlying historical truth. Record lineage and object ownership history remain separate." }, { "concept": "Historical time and operational timestamps", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "RFC 3339 applies to operational timestamps; historical dates retain calendar, interval and precision. Event, observation and recorded times are not collapsed, and planned loan dates cannot replace actual receipt evidence." }, { "concept": "Condition, care and lifecycle", "disposition": "accepted as documentary scope", "rationale": "Condition is a scoped observation with limitations. Intervention proposals, authority and actual outcomes remain distinct. Loss, destruction, recovery, deaccession and record retirement do not share one deletion transition. No technical treatment or dangerous-item procedure is supplied." }, { "concept": "Legal protection and return claims", "disposition": "qualified by external authority", "rationale": "The model records jurisdiction, instrument, reviewer and unresolved applicability. A missing designation is not permission, and a request or local status update cannot adjudicate title, issue a permit or execute a return. No exclusivity claim for heritage rights is retained." }, { "concept": "Community protocols and disclosure", "disposition": "accepted with adoption hold", "rationale": "Community interests, consent, privacy and security qualify recipient-specific disclosure. A researcher or custodian role alone does not grant unrestricted access. Local protocols and representation must be established before operational use, including restrictions on existence metadata." }, { "concept": "Physical object, evidence artifact and surrogate rights", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "The schema's artifact nodes are documentary evidence with their own master and revision IDs. They are not the physical cultural object. Object rights, image reuse, record access and derivative lineage remain target-specific." }, { "concept": "Retention and adverse provenance", "disposition": "accepted with policy dependency", "rationale": "The draft rejects erasing unfavorable history to strengthen title appearance while also requiring lawful payload erasure or redaction under the adopting retention authority. Minimal tombstones do not authorize indefinite retention of sensitive personal or community knowledge." }, { "concept": "Legacy composition and current neighbor meanings", "disposition": "candidate alignments only", "rationale": "The registry relationship CSV supplies no matching edges. M2 inheritance is reduced to alignment, M1 is not a universal material classifier, and P1 cannot be treated as generic place after its current terrain mapping. Actor and external place references require pinned adoption bindings." }, { "concept": "Proposed operations and runtime assurance", "disposition": "limited to local documentary effects", "rationale": "All six functions are explicitly unimplemented and include authority, expected revision and refusal conditions. They can prepare records and projections but do not publish, transfer, treat, sell, export or decide legal rights. Candidate nested fields and acceptance scenarios are not runtime tests." }, { "concept": "Source verification and version evidence", "disposition": "limited", "rationale": "Selected browser text supports the admitted concepts, including the pinned 2026 ethics text. Direct HTTP was not attempted under the reported sandbox restriction, so endpoint status and binary hashes are unmeasured. The checker is prepared for the coordinator, and browser retrieval is not substituted for a completed source gate." }, { "concept": "Independent review and inherited provider labels", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts for this run. Historic registry provenance and the supplement's author label are not admitted provider results. This separate local Codex assessment introduces no new facts and cannot count as independent external agreement." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts; the separate frozen local Codex no-tools self-audit is not a second-provider review.", "Live source and version verification remains incomplete. Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox restriction; zero responses and zero HTTP 200 statuses were measured. Selected browser text access is documented in source-review.md. The coordinator must run check_sources.py outside the sandbox and assess source content, versions and licences separately.", "Jurisdiction, institutional collection rules, community representation and consent, sensitive-material protocols, privacy, rights, export restrictions and return claims require qualified adoption-profile review. No authenticity, lawful-title or legal-compliance certification is claimed.", "Nested instance schemas, pinned neighbor and place bindings, executable CRM/LIDO/PROV mappings, policy enforcement and adversarial instance fixtures remain incomplete. Proposed functions and acceptance scenarios are not an implemented runtime or conformance suite.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Complete direct source checks and review pinned text, licensing, jurisdictional applicability and institution-specific implementation, including the 2026 ethics code.", "Develop nested instance profiles and adversarial fixtures for disputed custody, functional sets, uncertain historical dates, community-restricted projections, lawful erasure and lossy exchange; pin current material and place bindings.", "Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 8, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 36, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }