World Models · Published

Employment

Represent one governed, jurisdiction-qualified employment relationship between a worker party and an employing party, including identity, classification evidence, terms, assignment realization, continuity, separation, disagreement and provenance without depending on storage or interface format.

AI YAMLAGENTS.mdResearch evidence
Published. Research assurance: reviewable-draft. The Codex-only synthesis is published under an explicit repository-owner provider waiver. It passed structural validation and a separate no-tools adversarial audit, but remains a reviewable draft until independent second-provider review and the holds below are closed.
Catalogue IDWM-ORG-005
Version0.3.0-research.1
Previous version-
Typerelationship
ValidationPassed
Synthesis digestsha256:29400ff51ee64aa2…
12Sources
7Bundles
16Layers
32Findings
96Questions
32Artifacts
Format-independent logical structure

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions + Artifacts

relationship-identity-parties-and-authorityRelationship identity, parties and authority2 layers

Identifies the employment relationship and the parties and authorities around it.

relationship-master-identityRelationship master identity2 findings

Stable identity, aliases, source systems and duplicate or successor handling.

authoritative-relationship-identifier-and-master-system

Authoritative relationship identifier and master system

The stable identifier, issuer, namespace, master system, status and typed aliases for one employment relationship.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for authoritative relationship identifier and master system?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes authoritative relationship identifier and master system, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may authoritative relationship identifier and master system be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Authoritative relationship identifier and master system recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for authoritative relationship identifier and master system with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
duplicate-merge-split-transfer-and-successor-lineage

Duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage

Rules and evidence that reconcile duplicates or create successors without erasing cited relationship identities.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for duplicate, merge, split, transfer and successor lineage with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
party-topology-and-authorityParty topology and authority2 findings

Worker, employer and other party roles, their effective intervals and authority sources.

worker-and-employing-party-bindings

Worker and employing party bindings

Typed references to worker and employing party with asserted and effective role intervals and identity provenance.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for worker and employing party bindings?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes worker and employing party bindings, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may worker and employing party bindings be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Worker and employing party bindings recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for worker and employing party bindings with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
agency-host-client-paymaster-platform-and-authority-roles

Agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles

Allows multi-party work without treating every operational or payment party as the legal employer.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles?authority
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agency, host, client, paymaster, platform and authority roles with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
legal-classification-jurisdiction-and-recognitionLegal classification, jurisdiction and recognition3 layers

Separates evidence, statistical classifications, party assertions and legally effective determinations.

basis-jurisdiction-and-instrumentsBasis, jurisdiction and instruments2 findings

The asserted basis, applicable territory, purpose and governing instruments.

contractual-statutory-factual-and-appointment-basis

Contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis

References the instrument or facts said to create employment and records who asserts that basis.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis?authority
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for contractual, statutory, factual and appointment basis with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
jurisdiction-scope-applicable-law-and-collective-instruments

Jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments

Pins territorial, personal and subject scope plus applicable legal, collective, policy and ratification profiles.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments?constraint
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for jurisdiction, scope, applicable law and collective instruments with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
status-classification-and-indicatorsStatus classification and indicators2 findings

Records purpose-qualified categories and the evidence used for them.

employee-worker-dependent-contractor-and-self-employed-assertions

Employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions

Parallel party, statistical, administrative and legal status assertions with scheme, purpose, time and confidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for employee, worker, dependent-contractor and self-employed assertions with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
control-dependence-remuneration-risk-and-integration-indicators

Control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators

Observable indicators and counter-indicators with method, source and applicability, never a label-only conclusion.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators?evidence
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for control, dependence, remuneration, risk and integration indicators with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
determination-dispute-and-recognitionDetermination, dispute and recognition2 findings

Recognition criteria, competent determinations, competing assertions and correction.

competent-status-determination-scope-and-effect

Competent status determination, scope and effect

Authority, decision reference, legal basis, effective period, appeal state and exact purposes for which a determination controls.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for competent status determination, scope and effect?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes competent status determination, scope and effect, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may competent status determination, scope and effect be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Competent status determination, scope and effect recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for competent status determination, scope and effect with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
misclassification-dispute-appeal-and-retroactive-correction

Misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction

Contested status, claims, decisions, remedies and bitemporal corrections while prior assertions remain visible.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for misclassification dispute, appeal and retroactive correction with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
commencement-terms-and-working-contextCommencement, terms and working context3 layers

Captures when the relationship begins and which external terms and work-context assertions apply.

commencement-probation-and-timeCommencement, probation and time2 findings

Agreed, recorded, effective and recognized beginning and probation facts.

agreement-appointment-start-and-antecedent-service

Agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service

Creation basis, agreed and actual start, credited prior service, seniority anchor and evidence references.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service?temporal
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agreement, appointment, start and antecedent service with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
probation-trial-confirmation-and-rescission

Probation, trial, confirmation and rescission

Probation basis, limits, extensions, outcome and relationship effect without confusing probation with employment identity.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for probation, trial, confirmation and rescission?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes probation, trial, confirmation and rescission, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may probation, trial, confirmation and rescission be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Probation, trial, confirmation and rescission recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for probation, trial, confirmation and rescission with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
term-bindings-and-precedenceTerm bindings and precedence2 findings

Versioned references to individual, collective, statutory and policy terms.

duration-renewal-notice-and-precedence

Duration, renewal, notice and precedence

Open-ended or fixed duration, end condition, renewal, notice method and precedence among applicable term sources.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for duration, renewal, notice and precedence?constraint
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes duration, renewal, notice and precedence, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may duration, renewal, notice and precedence be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Duration, renewal, notice and precedence recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for duration, renewal, notice and precedence with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
remuneration-benefit-training-and-expense-references

Remuneration, benefit, training and expense references

Bindings to compensation, benefit, training and reimbursable-expense masters with effective time and disclosure class.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for remuneration, benefit, training and expense references?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes remuneration, benefit, training and expense references, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may remuneration, benefit, training and expense references be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Remuneration, benefit, training and expense references recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for remuneration, benefit, training and expense references with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
working-time-place-and-patternWorking time, place and pattern2 findings

Capacity and location context that qualifies the relationship without replacing schedules or attendance.

capacity-working-time-pattern-overtime-and-predictability

Capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability

Contracted capacity, standard pattern, predictability, reference hours and applicable overtime or minimum-notice rules.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability?measurement
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for capacity, working-time pattern, overtime and predictability with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
workplace-remote-mobile-and-cross-border-context

Workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context

Primary and permitted places, remote or mobile mode, host territory, travel expectation and jurisdiction implications by reference.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context?spatial
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for workplace, remote, mobile and cross-border context with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
role-assignment-and-occupation-bindingRole, assignment and occupation binding2 layers

Connects employment to positions, assignments, occupations and skills without importing their lifecycles.

position-role-and-assignmentPosition, role and assignment2 findings

Time-qualified realization links to externally mastered organizational work records.

position-unit-role-and-reporting-references

Position, unit, role and reporting references

References formal positions, organizational units, role concepts and reporting structures without copying them into employment.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for position, unit, role and reporting references?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes position, unit, role and reporting references, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may position, unit, role and reporting references be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Position, unit, role and reporting references recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for position, unit, role and reporting references with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
assignment-realization-validity-and-concurrency

Assignment realization, validity and concurrency

Links one employment relationship to concurrent or sequential WM-ORG-016 assignments and records link validity only.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for assignment realization, validity and concurrency?composition
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes assignment realization, validity and concurrency, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may assignment realization, validity and concurrency be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Assignment realization, validity and concurrency recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for assignment realization, validity and concurrency with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
job-occupation-and-skill-contextJob, occupation and skill context2 findings

Separates the concrete job from reusable occupation and skill concepts.

job-task-duty-and-occupation-classification-reference

Job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference

Binds current or historic job and assignment references to versioned ISCO, ESCO or local occupation concepts.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for job, task, duty and occupation-classification reference with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
required-used-and-developed-skill-references

Required, used and developed skill references

Purpose-qualified links to skill concepts and evidence while qualifications and assessments remain external.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for required, used and developed skill references?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes required, used and developed skill references, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may required, used and developed skill references be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Required, used and developed skill references recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for required, used and developed skill references with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
lifecycle-continuity-and-separationLifecycle, continuity and separation3 layers

Represents relationship state and change independently of assignment, payroll or access-system activity.

status-continuity-and-successionStatus, continuity and succession2 findings

Current and historic relationship state, continuity and successor employer bindings.

active-inactive-disputed-and-unknown-relationship-state

Active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state

Time-qualified state assertion, source, confidence and validation that never derives state from one operational system alone.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state?state
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for active, inactive, disputed and unknown relationship state with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
employer-succession-transfer-and-service-continuity

Employer succession, transfer and service continuity

Predecessor and successor parties, authority, continuity decision, credited service and unchanged or changed term bindings.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for employer succession, transfer and service continuity?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes employer succession, transfer and service continuity, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may employer succession, transfer and service continuity be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Employer succession, transfer and service continuity recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for employer succession, transfer and service continuity with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
interruption-change-and-resumptionInterruption, change and resumption2 findings

Relationship-level effects of leave, suspension, secondment and material amendment.

leave-suspension-secondment-and-nonperformance-effect

Leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect

References the external event and records whether employment, service, pay, benefits, assignment and notice clocks continue or pause.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect?event
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for leave, suspension, secondment and nonperformance effect with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
separation-and-post-employmentSeparation and post-employment2 findings

End basis, procedure, contest and surviving bindings.

resignation-expiry-dismissal-mutual-end-and-other-basis

Resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis

Qualified separation basis, initiating party, decision or notice references, stated reason, effective time and uncertainty.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for resignation, expiry, dismissal, mutual end and other basis with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
notice-challenge-remedy-and-surviving-obligation-references

Notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references

Notice compliance, appeal, reinstatement or compensation outcome and surviving confidentiality or other obligation bindings.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for notice, challenge, remedy and surviving-obligation references with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
assertions-evidence-privacy-and-trustAssertions, evidence, privacy and trust2 layers

Keeps both parties' assertions, authoritative determinations and minimum-disclosure access auditable.

party-assertions-evidence-and-qualityParty assertions, evidence and quality2 findings

Attribution, acknowledgement, discrepancies and evidence quality for relationship facts.

worker-employer-third-party-and-authority-assertions

Worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions

Parallel attributable statements with purpose, valid time, knowledge time, confidence, acknowledgement and contest status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions?provenance
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for worker, employer, third-party and authority assertions with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
evidence-attestation-freshness-quality-and-reconciliation

Evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation

Evidence references, issuer, collection method, freshness, reliability, conflicts and explicit reconciliation outcome.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation?quality
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
privacy-access-retention-and-verificationPrivacy, access, retention and verification2 findings

Purpose-bound access, correction, retention and minimum employment verification.

purpose-access-correction-portability-and-restriction

Purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction

Field and artifact access by role and purpose, worker access, correction route, portability profile and lawful restrictions.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction?access
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for purpose, access, correction, portability and restriction with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
interoperability-governance-and-agent-operationsInteroperability, governance and agent operations1 layers

Controls profiles, projections, autonomous checks and safe relationship change.

profiles-projections-and-agent-controlProfiles, projections and agent control2 findings

Versioned mappings and permissioned agent actions.

jurisdiction-statistical-hr-and-linked-data-profiles

Jurisdiction, statistical, HR and linked-data profiles

Pinned source and target versions, mapping scope, transformed or omitted values, validation and non-round-trip declarations.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for jurisdiction, statistical, hr and linked-data profiles?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes jurisdiction, statistical, hr and linked-data profiles, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may jurisdiction, statistical, hr and linked-data profiles be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Jurisdiction, statistical, HR and linked-data profiles recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for jurisdiction, statistical, hr and linked-data profiles with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
agent-operation-authority-validation-and-audit

Agent operation authority, validation and audit

Allowed read, append, reconcile, propose, confirm and forbidden actions with preconditions, effects, rollback and audit evidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agent operation authority, validation and audit?security
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which party, authority, source and evidence establishes agent operation authority, validation and audit, at what asserted, effective and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting party
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may agent operation authority, validation and audit be validated, contested, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge or correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Agent operation authority, validation and audit recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agent operation authority, validation and audit with authority, valid time, knowledge time, provenance and access marking.

Publication holds

  • Claude and Grok timed out during their bounded attempts, so independent external review is absent and explicitly waived for this published reviewable draft.
  • The previous O3 card combined Employment and Membership, while the current registry requires separate WM-ORG-005 and WM-ORG-006 boundaries; this publication replaces that combined boundary only for WM-ORG-005.
  • The relation ledger marks WM-ORG-005 COMPOSE WM-ORG-016 as candidate rather than approved, and other neighboring model relations are not approved, so all proposed composition remains draft.
  • National labour-law, public-service, military, seafarer, domestic-work, child-work, platform-work, apprenticeship and collective-bargaining profiles require specialist review.
  • Certified HR-schema, ICSE-18, ISCO-08, ESCO, W3C ORG and jurisdictional crosswalks, conformance fixtures and rights-impact suites remain unverified.
  • Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft.

Deferred research

  • Develop jurisdiction-specific status, rights, termination, transfer, working-time, agency-work, platform-work and record-retention profiles.
  • Approve model identifiers and relation cardinalities for parties, positions, assignments, occupations, contracts, policies, payroll, attendance, benefits, tax, social insurance, qualifications, recruitment, evidence and access.
  • Create deterministic fixtures for duplicate relationships, concurrent employers, agency and host roles, status disputes, retroactive determinations, employer succession, separation challenges and minimum verification.
  • Validate certified statistical, HR, linked-data and legal-document projections with explicit information-loss and round-trip tests.