World Models · Published

Membership

Represent one governed, qualified relationship between a member agent and an organization or group, including admission, roles, validity, standing, terms, lifecycle, evidence and privacy without depending on storage or interface format.

AI YAMLAGENTS.mdResearch evidence
Published. Research assurance: reviewable-draft. The Codex-only synthesis is published under an explicit repository-owner provider waiver. It passed structural validation and a separate no-tools adversarial audit, but remains a reviewable draft until independent second-provider review and the holds below are closed.
Catalogue IDWM-ORG-006
Version0.3.0-research.1
Previous version-
Typerelationship
ValidationPassed
Synthesis digestsha256:6dec828608b32102…
9Sources
7Bundles
16Layers
32Findings
96Questions
32Artifacts
Format-independent logical structure

Bundles → Layers → Findings → Questions + Artifacts

relationship-identity-parties-and-schemeRelationship identity, parties and scheme2 layers

Identifies one membership and the member, organization or group and governing membership scheme.

membership-master-identityMembership master identity2 findings

Stable relationship identity, source systems, aliases and successor lineage.

authoritative-membership-identifier-and-master-system

Authoritative membership identifier and master system

The stable relationship identifier, issuer, namespace, master system, local keys and resolution status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for authoritative membership identifier and master system?identity
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes authoritative membership identifier and master system, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may authoritative membership identifier and master system be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Authoritative membership identifier and master system recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for authoritative membership identifier and master system with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
duplicate-merge-split-reissue-and-successor-lineage

Duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage

Reconciliation and successor rules that preserve cited identities and prior assertions.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for duplicate, merge, split, reissue and successor lineage with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
parties-type-and-governing-schemeParties, type and governing scheme2 findings

Member and organization bindings plus profile-qualified classification.

member-agent-and-organization-or-group-bindings

Member agent and organization or group bindings

Typed references to the member agent and admitting organization or governed group with identity authority and intervals.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for member agent and organization or group bindings?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes member agent and organization or group bindings, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may member agent and organization or group bindings be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Member agent and organization or group bindings recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for member agent and organization or group bindings with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
membership-type-profile-classification-and-scheme-version

Membership type, profile, classification and scheme version

Versioned type and profile concepts, scheme authority, applicability and class-distinguishing criteria.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for membership type, profile, classification and scheme version?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes membership type, profile, classification and scheme version, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may membership type, profile, classification and scheme version be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Membership type, profile, classification and scheme version recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for membership type, profile, classification and scheme version with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
admission-eligibility-and-authorityAdmission, eligibility and authority2 layers

Explains how membership is proposed, evaluated and admitted under a governing basis.

application-nomination-and-eligibilityApplication, nomination and eligibility2 findings

External request, sponsorship and eligibility assertions linked to this relationship.

application-nomination-invitation-and-sponsor-reference

Application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference

References the initiating request or act, nominator, sponsor, requested class, time and provenance.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference?provenance
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for application, nomination, invitation and sponsor reference with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
eligibility-criteria-evidence-exception-and-expiry

Eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry

Versioned criteria, evidence, evaluator, exception authority, decision scope and freshness without importing assessments.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for eligibility criteria, evidence, exception and expiry with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
decision-basis-and-effective-admissionDecision, basis and effective admission2 findings

The accountable admission or rejection and its relationship effect.

governing-charter-bylaw-rule-resolution-or-agreement

Governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement

Typed references to the constitutive or contractual basis, authority, jurisdiction, version and precedence scope.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement?authority
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for governing charter, bylaw, rule, resolution or agreement with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
admission-rejection-decision-conditions-and-effective-time

Admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time

Decision maker, authority, reason, conditions, appeal state and distinct decision, effective and knowledge times.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for admission or rejection decision, conditions and effective time with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
roles-scope-and-participation-contextRoles, scope and participation context2 layers

Qualifies which roles are held through membership and where they apply.

role-and-post-bindingRole and post binding2 findings

Membership roles, scopes and optional post references with their own intervals.

role-concept-scope-unit-and-validity

Role concept, scope, unit and validity

Versioned role reference, organizational or domain scope, effective interval and profile-specific cardinality.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for role concept, scope, unit and validity?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes role concept, scope, unit and validity, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may role concept, scope, unit and validity be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Role concept, scope, unit and validity recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for role concept, scope, unit and validity with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
role-held-through-membership-versus-independent-post

Role held through membership versus independent post

Distinguishes a member's role binding from an independently existing post that can be vacant or held by another route.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for role held through membership versus independent post?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes role held through membership versus independent post, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may role held through membership versus independent post be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Role held through membership versus independent post recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for role held through membership versus independent post with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
participation-affiliation-and-non-equivalenceParticipation, affiliation and non-equivalence2 findings

References activities and adjacent relationships without conflating them with membership.

participation-activity-project-and-contribution-references

Participation, activity, project and contribution references

Time-qualified links to externally mastered activities, projects and contributions associated with membership.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for participation, activity, project and contribution references?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes participation, activity, project and contribution references, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may participation, activity, project and contribution references be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Participation, activity, project and contribution references recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for participation, activity, project and contribution references with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
employment-office-subscription-citizenship-licence-and-access-boundary

Employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary

Typed non-equivalence and optional relationship links that prevent inference of membership from neighboring statuses.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for employment, office, subscription, citizenship, licence and access boundary with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
standing-validity-and-lifecycleStanding, validity and lifecycle3 layers

Represents current and historic membership condition, intervals and governed transitions.

validity-state-and-observationValidity, state and observation2 findings

Relationship validity intervals, asserted standing and observed freshness.

proposed-pending-active-suspended-ended-rejected-and-revoked-state

Proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state

Profile-qualified relationship state, source, authority, valid interval, confidence and explicit unknown status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state?state
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for proposed, pending, active, suspended, ended, rejected and revoked state with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
valid-decision-event-observation-and-knowledge-time

Valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time

Separate time axes and intervals for relationship effect, decisions, events, observations and when assertions became known.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time?temporal
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for valid, decision, event, observation and knowledge time with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
renewal-suspension-and-reinstatementRenewal, suspension and reinstatement2 findings

Non-terminal changes and their effect on role, right and duty bindings.

renewal-extension-revalidation-and-lapse

Renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse

Renewal basis, decision, changed conditions, new validity, grace period and lapse effect with predecessor lineage.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for renewal, extension, revalidation and lapse with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
suspension-restriction-reinstatement-and-restored-standing

Suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing

Authority, reason, due process, affected rights and duties, review date, remedy and reinstatement effect.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing?process
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for suspension, restriction, reinstatement and restored standing with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
resignation-termination-and-revocationResignation, termination and revocation2 findings

Terminal or successor events, reasons, challenge and surviving history.

resignation-expiry-termination-removal-and-revocation-basis

Resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis

Initiating actor, basis, authority, notice, effective time, stated reason and distinction among voluntary, automatic and adverse endings.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis?lifecycle
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for resignation, expiry, termination, removal and revocation basis with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
challenge-appeal-remedy-successor-and-tombstone

Challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone

Contest status, review authority, decision and remedy, reinstatement or successor identity and durable minimum tombstone.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone?decision
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for challenge, appeal, remedy, successor and tombstone with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
terms-duties-fees-and-benefitsTerms, duties, fees and benefits2 layers

Links governed terms and economic or non-economic consequences without importing policy, payment or entitlement execution.

terms-rights-duties-and-constraintsTerms, rights, duties and constraints2 findings

Versioned rule and policy bindings that qualify membership.

term-version-precedence-acceptance-and-amendment

Term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment

Applicable term sources, version, precedence, party notice or acceptance, effective time and immutable amendment lineage.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment?constraint
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for term version, precedence, acceptance and amendment with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
permission-prohibition-duty-and-compliance-reference

Permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference

ODRL or profile-specific policy links with assigner, assignee, target, action, constraint and external evaluation evidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for permission, prohibition, duty and compliance reference with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
fee-benefit-and-entitlement-referencesFee, benefit and entitlement references2 findings

Economic and service consequences and their independent records.

fee-assessment-invoice-payment-waiver-and-arrears-reference

Fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference

Links externally mastered fee and payment records and states why they do or do not affect membership standing.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for fee assessment, invoice, payment, waiver and arrears reference with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
benefit-service-resource-and-access-entitlement-reference

Benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference

Links externally mastered benefits and grants with scope, validity and governing term without treating access as membership proof.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference?relationship
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for benefit, service, resource and access-entitlement reference with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
evidence-privacy-dispute-and-trustEvidence, privacy, dispute and trust3 layers

Maintains assertions, attestations, conflicts and privacy-safe projections.

assertions-evidence-and-qualityAssertions, evidence and quality2 findings

Attributable source statements, observations and reconciliation.

member-organization-sponsor-issuer-and-authority-assertions

Member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions

Parallel statements with actor, role, basis, valid and knowledge time, confidence, acknowledgement and contest status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions?provenance
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for member, organization, sponsor, issuer and authority assertions with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
evidence-attestation-freshness-quality-and-reconciliation

Evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation

Source records, method, issuer, digest, status observation, freshness, conflict and explicit reconciliation result.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation?quality
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for evidence, attestation, freshness, quality and reconciliation with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
credential-directory-and-proof-projectionsCredential, directory and proof projections2 findings

Portable and discoverable representations that remain separate from the source relationship.

verifiable-membership-credential-and-status-reference

Verifiable membership credential and status reference

Issuer, subject, schema, validity, evidence, status and terms-of-use references plus privacy and correlation profile.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for verifiable membership credential and status reference?evidence
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes verifiable membership credential and status reference, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may verifiable membership credential and status reference be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Verifiable membership credential and status reference recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for verifiable membership credential and status reference with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
directory-listing-badge-roster-and-minimal-verification

Directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification

Purpose-specific projections, exposed fields, audience, freshness, revocation behavior and non-authoritative status.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification?access
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for directory listing, badge, roster and minimal verification with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
privacy-access-correction-and-retentionPrivacy, access, correction and retention2 findings

Field-sensitive disclosure and durable lawful history.

existence-role-date-standing-and-evidence-disclosure

Existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure

Separately classifies the sensitivity, purpose, audience and masking rules for each fact and inference surface.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure?privacy
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for existence, role, date, standing and evidence disclosure with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
interoperability-governance-and-agent-operationsInteroperability, governance and agent operations2 layers

Controls classifications, mappings, validation and safe automated action.

classification-and-profile-projectionsClassification and profile projections2 findings

Versioned type, role, state and reason vocabularies and mappings.

membership-role-standing-and-reason-concept-schemes

Membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes

Pinned concept identifiers, labels, scope notes, hierarchy, authority, version and mapping confidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes?classification
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for membership, role, standing and reason concept schemes with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
w3c-org-credential-policy-and-domain-profile-mappings

W3C ORG, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings

Source and target versions, mapping scope, transformed or omitted data, validation and non-round-trip declarations.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for w3c org, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings?interoperability
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes w3c org, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may w3c org, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • W3C ORG, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for w3c org, credential, policy and domain-profile mappings with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
agent-control-and-safe-operationAgent control and safe operation2 findings

Authorized operations, invariants, rollback and audit.

agent-operation-authority-purpose-and-confirmation-class

Agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class

Classifies read, create, admit, suspend, reinstate, terminate, disclose and delete operations as autonomous, propose, confirm or forbidden.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class?security
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for agent operation authority, purpose and confirmation class with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.
prewrite-postwrite-validation-conflict-and-recovery

Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery

Identity, party, authority, time, state-transition, policy, privacy, concurrency and rollback checks with immutable audit evidence.

Questions
  1. What exact values, references, qualifiers and explicit unknowns must be recorded for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery?validation
    Expected answer
    • value or reference
    • scheme and scope
    • valid time
    • explicit unknowns
  2. Which member, organization, authority, source and evidence establishes pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery, at what event, valid and knowledge time, and with what confidence?evidence
    Expected answer
    • asserting actor
    • authority and basis
    • source and evidence
    • times
    • confidence
  3. How may pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery be validated, challenged, corrected, superseded, retained or disclosed without erasing prior assertions or importing a neighboring model's lifecycle?validation
    Expected answer
    • validation rule
    • challenge and correction route
    • successor or tombstone
    • access and retention effect
Artifacts
  • Pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery recordVersioned evidence-bearing record for pre-write and post-write validation, conflict and recovery with authority, event, valid and knowledge time, provenance and access marking.

Publication holds

  • Claude and Grok timed out during their bounded attempts, so independent external review is absent and explicitly waived for this published reviewable draft.
  • The previous O3 card combined Employment and Membership, while the current registry requires separate WM-ORG-005 and WM-ORG-006 boundaries; this publication defines only Membership.
  • The approved relationship ledger contains no WM-ORG-006 rows, so all proposed sibling composition remains draft.
  • Company, cooperative, association, union, professional-body, standards-body, club, community, family, religious, political and machine-agent membership profiles require specialist review.
  • Certified W3C ORG, OWL-Time, ODRL, Verifiable Credentials, LegalRuleML, SKOS, directory and domain-schema crosswalks, conformance fixtures and privacy tests remain unverified.
  • Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft.

Deferred research

  • Develop domain profiles for voluntary, statutory, professional, corporate, cooperative, community, family, standards, political and machine-agent memberships.
  • Approve model identifiers and relation cardinalities for agents, organizations, roles, posts, activities, policies, payments, subscriptions, credentials, access grants, decisions and evidence.
  • Create deterministic fixtures for duplicate memberships, multiple schemes, concurrent roles, non-contiguous validity, suspension, reinstatement, appeal, private existence and stale credential status.
  • Validate certified organization, policy, credential, legal-rule, directory and domain projections with explicit loss, correlation-risk and round-trip tests.