# Vercy AI instruction - YAML 1.2 (JSON-compatible) { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "published", "adjudicationStatus": "reviewable-draft", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-10-06T15:11:58Z", "synthesisSha256": "ee2088fd072f1ef0ccfea0b92d3c5a3b80d329fbda54815a954ca5bf6ab12c7f", "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "Claude", "Grok" ] }, "metaModel": { "id": "WM-ORG-007", "registryId": "vr.wm-org-007", "name": "Mandate / Charter", "version": "0.3.0", "previousVersions": [ { "version": "0.2.0", "url": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/blob/feat/mega-model-registry/models/organizations/O4-organizational-mandate-and-charter.md" } ], "entryKind": "entity", "family": "World Models", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "industry": [ "Cross-industry" ], "domain": [ "SOC.ORG.MND" ], "tags": [ "mandate", "charter", "soc.org.mnd" ], "status": "published" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/wm-org-007-mandate-charter/", "sourceUrl": "https://github.com/ver-cy/world-models/tree/feat/mega-model-registry/research/runs/wm-org-007", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.wm-org-007", "model_id": "WM-ORG-007", "name": "Mandate / Charter", "entry_kind": "entity", "purpose": "Represent one identifiable constitutive or mandate instrument and its provision-grounded assertions of purpose, powers, constraints and accountability across revisions.", "scope_statement": "The root is a persistent instrument record, including a charter, statute, articles, constitution or separately issued mandate instrument. Revisions and clause-level mandate assertions belong to that record; independently issued instruments get separate identities and references. It records claimed authority and evidence without adjudicating legal validity or executing grants.", "in_scope": [ "Instrument identity, type, applicable organization or body references, jurisdiction and authoritative text references.", "Version-qualified provisions, purposes, power assertions, reserved matters and delegation evidence references.", "Governance and amendment rules contained in the instrument, effective intervals, supersession, termination and renewal evidence.", "Accountability duty definitions and linked discharge assertions, evidence provenance and reader-specific projections." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Organization, unit, committee, position, employment and membership master lifecycles or legal entity registration.", "General access authorization, policy enforcement, signing, contract execution, filing submission and automated legal-effect decisions.", "Court proceedings, dispute resolution, accounting, full audit-trail infrastructure and unrelated internal policies.", "Operational instructions for weapons, detention or controlled items; any such mandate remains at policy and authority-reference level." ], "boundary_notes": [ { "neighbor": "Organization, unit and governance body", "distinction": "An instrument can govern an existing body without creating a new legal person. Do not require the legacy one-charter-to-one-organization cardinality. Refer to constituted or governed subjects with explicit relationship roles.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Position, employment and membership", "distinction": "Name the capacity in which an authority is held and resolve its holder externally. Being an employee or occupying a post does not by itself prove a power.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Organization policy and commercial contract", "distinction": "Record constitutive scope and clause references here. Routine policy and contract transactions retain their own masters; internal limits are not a universal conclusion about third-party legal effect.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "neighbor": "Legal entity registration and registry mandate", "distinction": "Registration evidence is a reference, not the charter identity. The legacy public-register label must not be mapped to a registry mandate as if it were a register entry.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-006" ] }, { "neighbor": "Instrument collection and legal document representation", "distinction": "One instrument may have many expressions and manifestations. A collection of independent instruments is not silently merged into one root. Clause numbering, organization numbers and file names are not sufficient instrument identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-008" ] }, { "neighbor": "Dispute case, stewardship, access and audit", "distinction": "Keep challenge, ownership, permission and audit event masters external; this record holds only scoped references and assertions. A provenance link is not certification.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] } ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "SRC-001", "title": "How to write your charity's governing document (CC22b)", "organization": "Charity Commission for England and Wales", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/how-to-write-your-charitys-governing-document-cc22b", "version_or_date": "Updated 2014-12-11; England and Wales guidance", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Purposes, powers, governing form, adoption and dissolution clauses; illustrative profile, not universal law." }, { "id": "SRC-002", "title": "Charitable companies: changing your governing document", "organization": "Charity Commission for England and Wales", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-to-make-changes-to-your-charitys-governing-document-cc36/charitable-companies-changing-your-governing-document", "version_or_date": "Updated 2026-06-25; England and Wales guidance", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Amendment evidence, external authority and distinct effective-date triggers; review restricted to sections 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6." }, { "id": "SRC-003", "title": "Federal Advisory Committee Charters", "organization": "United States General Services Administration", "url": "https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/faca-overview/advice-and-guidance/federal-advisory-committee-charters", "version_or_date": "Updated 2024-10-16; US federal advisory committee guidance", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Charter mission, duties, filing, renewal and termination in the FACA setting. No universal two-year term is inferred." }, { "id": "SRC-004", "title": "Companies Act 2006, section 40", "organization": "United Kingdom Parliament", "url": "https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/40", "version_or_date": "2006 c.46 section 40; official indexed excerpt only; consolidation unverified", "source_type": "legislation", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Counterexample to automatically treating internal constitutional limits as defeating third-party reliance. Full exceptions and current text require qualified review." }, { "id": "SRC-005", "title": "Model articles for private companies limited by shares", "organization": "United Kingdom Companies House", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-shares/model-articles-for-private-companies-limited-by-shares", "version_or_date": "Official model articles; articles 3-16 selected; adopted applicability unverified", "source_type": "public-authority", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Example of reserve powers, delegation, subdelegation, revocation, quorum, conflicts and decision records. An organization must evidence its actual adopted text." }, { "id": "SRC-006", "title": "The Organization Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation; sections 2.1, 2.2 and 5.2 reviewed", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Organization, unit, post, role and membership remain distinct external subjects; vocabulary alignment does not establish legal status." }, { "id": "SRC-007", "title": "PROV-O: The PROV Ontology", "organization": "World Wide Web Consortium", "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "version_or_date": "W3C Recommendation 2013-04-30", "source_type": "ontology", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Attribution, derivation, revision and activity provenance for evidence assertions, not proof of validity or truth." }, { "id": "SRC-008", "title": "Akoma Ntoso Version 1.0. Part 1: XML Vocabulary", "organization": "OASIS", "url": "https://docs.oasis-open.org/legaldocml/akn-core/v1.0/os/part1-vocabulary/akn-core-v1.0-os-part1-vocabulary.html", "version_or_date": "Version 1.0 OASIS Standard; Part 1 sections 4.1.3, 4.3, 5.7-5.10 selected", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Work, expression and manifestation distinction, addressable provisions and editorial metadata; conceptual alignment only." }, { "id": "SRC-009", "title": "RFC 3339: Date and Time on the Internet: Timestamps", "organization": "Internet Engineering Task Force", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3339", "version_or_date": "July 2002; sections 5.6-5.8", "source_type": "standard", "primary_source": true, "authority_tier": 1, "accessed_at": "2026-10-06T15:10:42Z", "relevance": "Timestamp syntax with seconds and offset. Date-only legal effect remains date precision rather than an invented instant." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "bundle-identity", "name": "Instrument identity", "description": "Instrument-specific context for instrument identity.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-identification", "name": "Persistent instrument", "description": "Answerable context for persistent instrument.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-identification", "name": "Persistent instrument", "description": "Separate the instrument from its governed subject, versions and copies. Record issuer-scoped identity and the precise instrument class.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-identification-q1", "text": "Which master identifies this instrument independently of the organization number and its copies?", "kind": "identity", "answer_data": [ "master instrument identifier", "issuer namespace", "organization reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-identification-q2", "text": "Is this record a founding instrument, governing instrument or separately issued mandate?", "kind": "classification", "answer_data": [ "instrument class", "classification basis", "governed subject roles" ] }, { "id": "finding-identification-q3", "text": "Which bodies are constituted, governed or assigned responsibilities by this instrument?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "typed subject references", "relationship scope", "evidence provision" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-instrument-key", "name": "Master instrument identifier", "description": "Master instrument identifier. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "identifier", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "data-subject-links", "name": "Typed governed-subject references", "description": "Typed governed-subject references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-identification", "name": "Instrument identity record", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for persistent instrument. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-recognition", "name": "Recognized text and interpretation", "description": "Answerable context for recognized text and interpretation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-recognition", "name": "Recognized text and interpretation", "description": "Distinguish authoritative text from drafts, templates, translations and editorial consolidations; record unresolved authority or precedence conflicts.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-recognition-q1", "text": "What evidence establishes the status of the text being relied upon?", "kind": "evidence", "answer_data": [ "text reference", "issuer attestation", "recognition status" ] }, { "id": "finding-recognition-q2", "text": "Which language, expression and manifestation were inspected by which reviewer?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "language", "expression reference", "copy digest", "reviewer", "observed at" ] }, { "id": "finding-recognition-q3", "text": "Which competing instruments or interpretations remain unresolved?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "competing citation", "precedence claim", "review disposition" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-text-links", "name": "Version-qualified text references", "description": "Version-qualified text references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "data-interpretation-state", "name": "Attribution and unresolved precedence assertions", "description": "Attribution and unresolved precedence assertions. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-recognition", "name": "Text authority assessment", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for recognized text and interpretation. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-effect", "name": "Adoption and effect", "description": "Instrument-specific context for adoption and effect.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-adoption", "name": "Adoption and recognition evidence", "description": "Answerable context for adoption and recognition evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-adoption", "name": "Adoption and recognition evidence", "description": "Record the adopting act and any signature, approval, filing or registration prerequisites selected by the applicable profile. Uploading a copy does not establish adoption.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-adoption-q1", "text": "Which body had competence to adopt this instrument under the cited basis?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "adopting body", "competence basis", "decision reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-adoption-q2", "text": "Which adoption prerequisites were met and which remain unconfirmed?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "applicable prerequisites", "evidence links", "unresolved steps" ] }, { "id": "finding-adoption-q3", "text": "What adoption, approval and filing events are evidenced separately?", "kind": "event", "answer_data": [ "event references", "event kind", "recorded outcomes" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-adoption-basis", "name": "Competence and adoption evidence", "description": "Competence and adoption evidence. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "data-prerequisites", "name": "Profile-specific prerequisites and status", "description": "Profile-specific prerequisites and status. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-adoption", "name": "Adoption evidence index", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for adoption and recognition evidence. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-002", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-validity", "name": "Effective scope and temporal status", "description": "Answerable context for effective scope and temporal status.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-validity", "name": "Effective scope and temporal status", "description": "Keep recorded status separate from asserted legal effect. Capture provision-level intervals and conditions; a date-only source is not converted to a fabricated midnight instant.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-validity-q1", "text": "When does each relevant provision start and stop applying at the stated precision?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "provision reference", "start", "end", "time precision", "trigger basis" ] }, { "id": "finding-validity-q2", "text": "What territorial, organizational and subject scope bounds its application?", "kind": "spatial", "answer_data": [ "jurisdiction", "territory", "subject scope", "profile basis" ] }, { "id": "finding-validity-q3", "text": "Is the claimed effect draft, pending, effective, suspended, expired or disputed at the requested time?", "kind": "state", "answer_data": [ "asserted state", "as-of time", "review status", "supporting event" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-effect-intervals", "name": "Provision effect intervals and precision", "description": "Provision effect intervals and precision. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ] }, { "id": "data-effect-assessment", "name": "As-of effect assertion with scope and uncertainty", "description": "As-of effect assertion with scope and uncertainty. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-validity", "name": "Effective-scope assessment", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for effective scope and temporal status. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-mandate", "name": "Purposes and powers", "description": "Instrument-specific context for purposes and powers.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-purpose", "name": "Purpose and intended beneficiaries", "description": "Answerable context for purpose and intended beneficiaries.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-purpose", "name": "Purpose and intended beneficiaries", "description": "Record intended ends separately from means and operational targets. Preserve source wording by reference and identify scope qualifiers without inventing a mission.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-purpose-q1", "text": "What purpose or charge does the instrument assign?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "purpose statement reference", "clause locator", "interpretation status" ] }, { "id": "finding-purpose-q2", "text": "Which activities are means to that purpose and which belong to another instrument?", "kind": "composition", "answer_data": [ "activity classes", "purpose links", "other instrument references" ] }, { "id": "finding-purpose-q3", "text": "How is reported progress related to the purpose without treating a target as authority?", "kind": "measurement", "answer_data": [ "external measure reference", "purpose linkage", "assessment limitations" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-purpose-assertions", "name": "Purposes with beneficiary and scope qualifiers", "description": "Purposes with beneficiary and scope qualifiers. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "1..n", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] }, { "id": "data-objective-links", "name": "External objective or measure references", "description": "External objective or measure references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-purpose", "name": "Purpose map", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for purpose and intended beneficiaries. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-powers", "name": "Power assertions and constraints", "description": "Answerable context for power assertions and constraints.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-powers", "name": "Power assertions and constraints", "description": "Record an action class, holder capacity, source and limits. Legal effect toward third parties requires separate review; a missing match means unresolved authority, not a universal prohibition.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-powers-q1", "text": "Which provision supports the holder capacity and action class of this asserted power?", "kind": "authority", "answer_data": [ "holder capacity reference", "action class", "source provision" ] }, { "id": "finding-powers-q2", "text": "Which limits, reserved matters and approvals qualify that power?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "conditions", "scope ceilings", "unit or currency", "reserved matter", "approval reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-powers-q3", "text": "What reliance or legal-effect questions require an external decision before this assertion can be used?", "kind": "decision", "answer_data": [ "reliance context", "unresolved legal question", "qualified decision reference" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-power-assertions", "name": "Source-qualified power assertions", "description": "Source-qualified power assertions. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "id": "data-power-conditions", "name": "Limits and approval dependencies", "description": "Limits and approval dependencies. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-powers", "name": "Powers and limits matrix", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for power assertions and constraints. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-governance", "name": "Governance and delegation", "description": "Instrument-specific context for governance and delegation.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-decision-rules", "name": "Constitutive decision rules", "description": "Answerable context for constitutive decision rules.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-decision-rules", "name": "Constitutive decision rules", "description": "Record the instrument rules governing body composition and decision procedures. Actual membership, eligibility and meeting outcomes are external evidence, not inferred from a roster.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-decision-rules-q1", "text": "Which body composition, appointment and quorum rules apply to this decision type?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "body reference", "appointment rule", "quorum rule", "decision type" ] }, { "id": "finding-decision-rules-q2", "text": "How do interest exclusions, vacancies or exceptional procedures alter eligibility?", "kind": "exception", "answer_data": [ "exclusion rule", "exception basis", "eligibility evidence references" ] }, { "id": "finding-decision-rules-q3", "text": "What evidence supports the claimed satisfaction of notice and voting requirements?", "kind": "validation", "answer_data": [ "notice reference", "vote record reference", "rule version", "review outcome" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-decision-rules", "name": "Constitutive governance rule references", "description": "Constitutive governance rule references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "id": "data-procedure-evidence", "name": "Linked procedure assessment evidence", "description": "Linked procedure assessment evidence. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-decision-rules", "name": "Governance rule map", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for constitutive decision rules. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-delegation", "name": "Delegation scope and continuity", "description": "Answerable context for delegation scope and continuity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-delegation", "name": "Delegation scope and continuity", "description": "Reference each grant to its source power and evidenced recipient capacity. Capture partial withdrawal and subdelegation limits without making employment, record access or a cycle into authority.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-delegation-q1", "text": "Which source power, grant instrument and recipient capacity support this delegation?", "kind": "relationship", "answer_data": [ "source power", "grant instrument", "recipient capacity", "grantor basis" ] }, { "id": "finding-delegation-q2", "text": "Does the evidenced grant permit subdelegation and within which boundaries?", "kind": "constraint", "answer_data": [ "subdelegation permission basis", "inherited constraints", "scope comparison" ] }, { "id": "finding-delegation-q3", "text": "Which revocation, holder change or expiry evidence affects the delegation chain?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "affected grant reference", "partial scope", "effective event", "unresolved downstream links" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-delegation-links", "name": "Delegation evidence links and typed capacities", "description": "Delegation evidence links and typed capacities. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-delegation-review", "name": "Chain completeness and revocation assessment", "description": "Chain completeness and revocation assessment. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-delegation", "name": "Delegation evidence map", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for delegation scope and continuity. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-change", "name": "Change and continuity", "description": "Instrument-specific context for change and continuity.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008", "SRC-001", "SRC-003" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-amendment", "name": "Amendment and consolidation", "description": "Answerable context for amendment and consolidation.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-amendment", "name": "Amendment and consolidation", "description": "Separate substantive amendment from editorial correction. Preserve affected provision mappings, approvals and effective triggers; later file timestamps do not select the legally operative version.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-amendment-q1", "text": "What procedure and external approvals govern this proposed amendment?", "kind": "process", "answer_data": [ "amendment power", "required approvals", "decision reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-amendment-q2", "text": "Which trigger makes each changed provision effective?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "changed provision", "trigger event", "effective date or instant", "pending conditions" ] }, { "id": "finding-amendment-q3", "text": "How does the consolidation map every affected clause to its source versions?", "kind": "interoperability", "answer_data": [ "old and new locators", "derivation map", "omissions", "editor status" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-amendment-links", "name": "Amendment acts and affected provisions", "description": "Amendment acts and affected provisions. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "data-consolidation-lineage", "name": "Version and clause derivation map", "description": "Version and clause derivation map. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "0..1", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-amendment", "name": "Amendment and consolidation map", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for amendment and consolidation. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-termination", "name": "Renewal, cessation and successor", "description": "Answerable context for renewal, cessation and successor.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-termination", "name": "Renewal, cessation and successor", "description": "Distinguish expiry of this instrument, withdrawal of a particular mandate and dissolution of the governed body. Preserve renewal gaps and successor references rather than assuming continuity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-termination-q1", "text": "What termination, renewal or replacement rule applies to this instrument?", "kind": "lifecycle", "answer_data": [ "termination basis", "renewal rule", "replacement reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-termination-q2", "text": "Is there an evidenced gap or overlap between the old and renewed mandate?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "old interval", "new interval", "continuity assessment" ] }, { "id": "finding-termination-q3", "text": "Which residual duties and record-custody arrangements survive cessation?", "kind": "retention", "answer_data": [ "surviving duty references", "custodian reference", "retention authority" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-cessation-events", "name": "Cessation and renewal evidence references", "description": "Cessation and renewal evidence references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-successor-links", "name": "Successor and surviving-duty links", "description": "Successor and surviving-duty links. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-termination", "name": "Continuity assessment", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for renewal, cessation and successor. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] }, { "id": "bundle-accountability", "name": "Accountability and evidence", "description": "Instrument-specific context for accountability and evidence.", "rationale": "Proposed research grouping supported by the cited examples and semantic alignments; not a mandated universal structure.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "layers": [ { "id": "layer-duties", "name": "Oversight duties and discharge assertions", "description": "Answerable context for oversight duties and discharge assertions.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-duties", "name": "Oversight duties and discharge assertions", "description": "Record duties created by the instrument and refer to performance evidence. Receipt, acceptance and satisfaction are distinct assertions; no filing or review is performed by this model.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-duties-q1", "text": "Which duty is owed to which oversight body under which clause?", "kind": "requirement", "answer_data": [ "duty identifier", "addressee reference", "clause", "scope" ] }, { "id": "finding-duties-q2", "text": "What cadence, trigger and reporting period qualify the duty?", "kind": "temporal", "answer_data": [ "cadence or trigger", "period", "deadline basis", "exception reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-duties-q3", "text": "Does the evidence show submission, receipt, acceptance or a disputed discharge?", "kind": "quality", "answer_data": [ "evidence reference", "assertion type", "reviewer", "dispute state" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-duty-definitions", "name": "Clause-grounded accountability duties", "description": "Clause-grounded accountability duties. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "data-discharge-links", "name": "Attributed discharge assertions and external evidence", "description": "Attributed discharge assertions and external evidence. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-duties", "name": "Accountability evidence index", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for oversight duties and discharge assertions. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] }, { "id": "layer-disclosure", "name": "Controlled disclosure and evidence integrity", "description": "Answerable context for controlled disclosure and evidence integrity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "findings": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure", "name": "Controlled disclosure and evidence integrity", "description": "Maintain a traceable instrument projection for its entitled audience. Public text does not automatically expose signatures, contact details, privileged interpretation or restricted evidence.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ], "questions": [ { "id": "finding-disclosure-q1", "text": "Which steward maintains the record and which authority approves its audience-specific projection?", "kind": "ownership", "answer_data": [ "record steward", "publishing authority", "authoritative-copy reference" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-q2", "text": "Which text and supporting evidence may this reader receive under the applicable access policy?", "kind": "access", "answer_data": [ "reader scope", "policy reference", "redaction basis", "projection identifier" ] }, { "id": "finding-disclosure-q3", "text": "How can a reader trace a projected claim to its inspected source and detect a changed copy?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "source locator", "revision reference", "digest", "inspection time", "limitations" ] } ], "data_elements": [ { "id": "data-projection-policy", "name": "Audience, stewardship and disclosure-policy references", "description": "Audience, stewardship and disclosure-policy references. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "object", "cardinality": "1", "required": true, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "data-integrity-evidence", "name": "Digests, provenance and disclosure decisions", "description": "Digests, provenance and disclosure decisions. Candidate field group; nested instance schema and profile constraints remain to be specified.", "value_kind": "collection", "cardinality": "0..n", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "artifacts": [ { "id": "artifact-disclosure", "name": "Disclosure and provenance record", "description": "Versioned evidence projection for controlled disclosure and evidence integrity. Local representation is a design proposal; the cited sources do not mandate this artifact format.", "media_or_form": [ "structured record", "human-readable view", "source reference index" ], "serial": true, "identity_strategy": "Authoritative master-system artifact identifier first; governed IRI second; Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID otherwise. Link instrument and revision separately; date and digest are metadata, not sole identity.", "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "inline_only_rationale": null } ] } ] } ] }, "functions": [ { "id": "function-register-instrument", "name": "Register instrument evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Create a local draft identity record for an evidenced instrument without adopting or registering the governed organization.", "inputs": [ "issuer-scoped identifier", "instrument class", "subject references", "text evidence" ], "outputs": [ "draft record or duplicate/unresolved-identity refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Create a draft revision and provenance link only." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "function-record-effect", "name": "Record effect assertion", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach a qualified assertion about adoption or effective scope after review; do not activate legal powers.", "inputs": [ "adoption evidence", "reviewer authority", "profile", "effective interval and precision" ], "outputs": [ "qualified effect assertion or unresolved-prerequisite report" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Append reviewed state evidence; legal effect remains an external determination." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-003", "SRC-009" ] }, { "id": "function-inspect-power", "name": "Inspect power evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Prepare a local evidence view for a requested capacity, action and time, including gaps and contradictory claims.", "inputs": [ "capacity reference", "action scope", "as-of time", "power and delegation evidence" ], "outputs": [ "evidence trace with supported, disputed or unknown assertions" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Read-only assessment; no signing authorization, access grant or legal-effect conclusion." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "function-record-amendment", "name": "Record amendment evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Link an evidenced amendment and changed clauses to their prior revision without executing amendment or filing.", "inputs": [ "decision reference", "approval evidence", "affected clauses", "effective triggers", "expected revision" ], "outputs": [ "new proposed revision or stale-input/missing-evidence refusal" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Append a version and derivation map; never overwrite adopted source text." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-002", "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] }, { "id": "function-record-duty-evidence", "name": "Link duty evidence", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Attach an attributed submission, receipt or acceptance assertion to a defined duty without declaring satisfaction from an upload.", "inputs": [ "duty reference", "period", "evidence reference", "assertion kind", "reviewer" ], "outputs": [ "qualified duty assertion or insufficient-evidence report" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Create an evidence link only; no report transmission or oversight decision." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-003", "SRC-007" ] }, { "id": "function-prepare-view", "name": "Prepare instrument view", "description": "Proposed, unimplemented local operation. Render a version-specific view for an entitled reader using the selected access policy.", "inputs": [ "instrument revision", "reader scope", "policy reference", "redaction decisions" ], "outputs": [ "traceable permitted view or access-denied result" ], "preconditions": [ "Resolve actor role and purpose-scoped permission under the adopting Dimension.", "Pin instrument, evidence and policy versions; reject unresolved identity or stale expected revision before any mutation.", "Retain unknowns and contrary evidence; do not infer competence from record access." ], "effects": [ "Produce a local projection and audit reference; no external publication." ], "source_refs": [ "SRC-007", "SRC-008" ] } ], "composition": [ { "target": "WM-ORG-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Governed organizations and oversight bodies remain independently mastered.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Organizational units are recipient references; this model does not create or restructure units.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-004", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Position capacity references replace the ambiguous legacy role-assignment shorthand.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-005", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Employment assignments supply holder evidence only; employment alone confers no charter power.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-006", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Membership evidence supports the capacity of a member; admission and termination remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-018", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Governance bodies supply decision-maker identity; meeting execution and body membership remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-005", "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-019", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Routine policies remain separate from constitutive rules and reference their enabling basis.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-ORG-010", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Legal entity registration is supporting evidence; never use its identifier as sole instrument identity.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-001", "SRC-008" ] }, { "target": "WM-ECO-006", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Contract transactions may cite powers; execution and third-party effects remain external.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-005" ] }, { "target": "WM-POL-009", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Challenges link to separately mastered court or arbitration cases.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-004", "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-XCT-001", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Record stewardship policy is referenced, not reconstructed as a constitutive power.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-XCT-002", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Reader permissions and consent are external access-policy inputs, not organizational powers.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "WM-XCT-004", "relation": "REFERENCE", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Link local access-audit evidence without importing a general audit-trail engine.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Conceptual alignment for organization and capacity references; no RDF implementation is supplied.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-006" ] }, { "target": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Conceptual provenance alignment, not legal certification or implemented conformance.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-007" ] }, { "target": "https://docs.oasis-open.org/legaldocml/akn-core/v1.0/os/part1-vocabulary/akn-core-v1.0-os-part1-vocabulary.html", "relation": "ALIGN", "purpose": "Candidate binding; adoption must pin the target version. Work, expression, manifestation and clause-reference alignment; no wildcard imports or conformance claim.", "required": false, "source_refs": [ "SRC-008" ] } ], "serviceLayers": { "dimension": { "owner_package_requirements": [ "Identify the accountable record steward by governed role and identifier, not a brand or product.", "Declare the authoritative instrument master, jurisdiction profile and permitted purposes.", "Pin access, evidence, retention and reviewer-authority policies before population.", "Separate record ownership from the issuer, governed subject and legal competence." ], "namespace_guidance": "Use a controlled instrument namespace with stable opaque IDs for local nodes. Preserve issuer namespaces and typed external references. An organization number, adoption date or clause label alone is insufficient identity.", "registry_links": [ "vr.wm-org-007", "Legacy O4 is migration input only; no inherited conformance claim.", "No incoming or outgoing relation-ledger rows were found for this model; proposed links require adoption review." ] }, "canon_and_patch": { "canonicalization_rules": [ "Preserve authoritative text by reference and keep editorial interpretation separately attributed.", "Resolve instrument identity before deduplicating versions or copies. A content digest establishes byte equality only.", "Select an as-of view using reviewed effect assertions, never ingestion order." ], "patch_rules": [ "Require expected revision, actor, reason, affected clauses and supporting evidence for changes.", "Use new revisions for corrections; do not overwrite a disputed adoption or amendment assertion.", "Treat substantive changes as proposals pending competent external action." ], "compatibility_rules": [ "Renumbered clauses retain explicit old-to-new mappings; ambiguous mappings remain unresolved.", "Changing instrument boundary, effect semantics or required references is a breaking profile change.", "A new projection format must preserve uncertainty, evidence attribution and access restrictions." ] }, "artifact_rules": { "identity_priority": [ "Authoritative master-system identifier", "Governed global identifier or IRI", "Dimension-assigned UUID or ULID" ], "timestamp_rule": "Instants use RFC 3339 with seconds and an explicit offset or Z. Keep event time separate from observation and ingestion time. Date-only source values retain date precision and jurisdiction context; never invent an instant.", "serial_naming_rule": "Use stable artifact identity plus explicit revision and instrument links; dates and filenames are labels only.", "integrity_rule": "Record hash algorithm, digest, source locator, inspected revision and reviewer. A signature or digest requires separate trust evaluation and does not prove legal validity." }, "policies": [ "These are proposed model governance rules, not legal requirements attributed to every cited jurisdiction.", "Require qualified profile review for competence, amendment, third-party reliance, termination and conflicts between instruments.", "No automated action may confer, revoke, exercise or certify a legal power from this research structure.", "Restricted subjects remain at policy level; retain authority references without operational methods.", "Do not equate provenance, public availability or lexical similarity with authenticity, authority or conformance." ], "crud": { "read": [ "Resolve entitled reader, as-of time and instrument version; expose unresolved authority and redaction status." ], "create": [ "Create draft instrument evidence only after identity and provenance checks; adoption must be separately evidenced." ], "update": [ "Append reviewed assertions with expected revision and reason; preserve contrary claims and derived-view lineage." ], "delete": [ "Retire or supersede the local record without asserting repeal, dissolution or revocation.", "Apply the adopted retention schedule, preservation holds and lawful deletion rules to payloads and personal data. Keep only permitted minimal tombstones and provenance; do not mandate indefinite retention.", "Deleting an index entry does not erase an authoritative external instrument or an audit master." ] }, "roles": [ { "name": "Record steward", "responsibilities": [ "Maintain identity, evidence links and version continuity." ] }, { "name": "Competence reviewer", "responsibilities": [ "Assess instrument status and authority assertions under the applicable profile." ] }, { "name": "Evidence curator", "responsibilities": [ "Record source provenance, uncertainty and contradiction without adjudicating legal effect." ] }, { "name": "Access custodian", "responsibilities": [ "Approve audience scope, redaction and retention decisions under external policy." ] }, { "name": "Entitled reader", "responsibilities": [ "Use only the permitted version-specific view and respect visible limitations." ] } ], "access": { "default_rule": "Deny nonpublic evidence unless the actor has purpose-scoped permission. Public instrument text does not imply public supporting personal or privileged material.", "scopes": [ "bundle", "layer", "finding", "artifact" ], "exceptions": [ "Publish only the portions authorized for a public register or audience; protect related evidence separately.", "Emergency or oversight exceptions require recorded policy basis, accountable approver, scope and expiry; none is implied." ], "audit_requirements": [ "Record actor, purpose, policy version, instrument revision and access or mutation outcome in the external audit master.", "Record redaction decisions and prevent derived views, indexes and caches from exposing restricted fields." ] }, "agents_bootstrap": { "filename": "AGENTS.md", "required_fields": [ "Name", "Type", "Specification URL", "Storage type URL", "Interface URL", "Processes URL", "Owner role", "Profile version", "Research holds" ], "read_order": [ "Read AGENTS.md and the adopting Dimension policies.", "Read spec.yaml, research holds, model boundary and candidate reference bindings.", "Inspect instrument identity, authoritative source, as-of scope and permission before proposing a mutation.", "Validate evidence, expected revision and profile prerequisites; report uncertainty and stop legally effective actions for competent external decision." ] } }, "coverage": { "claim": "Source-grounded proposed structure for one identifiable constitutive or mandate instrument, using selected official governance examples and semantic standards. A separate frozen local no-tools self-audit found no critical conflicts. Independent review, source/version verification, qualified legal profiles and executable conformance remain holds. This noncanonical reviewable draft records evidence-qualified authority assertions and does not execute or certify legal powers.", "confidence": "medium", "checklist": [ { "dimension": "identity", "status": "covered", "notes": "Instrument, expression and manifestation are distinguished from organization registration." }, { "dimension": "lifecycle", "status": "covered", "notes": "Draft, adoption, amendment, renewal, partial withdrawal and cessation are evidence-qualified." }, { "dimension": "relationships", "status": "covered", "notes": "Governed subjects, holder capacities and external masters have typed candidate references." }, { "dimension": "temporal", "status": "covered", "notes": "Effective intervals, conditional effect, as-of queries and date precision remain separate from observation time." }, { "dimension": "provenance", "status": "covered", "notes": "Attribution, conflicting evidence, derivation and integrity are tracked without truth certification." }, { "dimension": "ownership", "status": "covered", "notes": "Role-based stewardship is separated from issuer authority and legal powers." }, { "dimension": "validation", "status": "gap", "notes": "Research schema is testable; nested instance schemas, legal profiles and executable mappings are not supplied." }, { "dimension": "access", "status": "covered", "notes": "Reader-specific views and evidence restrictions are explicit proposed policies." }, { "dimension": "retention and deletion", "status": "covered", "notes": "Record retirement is distinct from repeal; adopted lawful retention controls payload disposal." }, { "dimension": "interoperability", "status": "gap", "notes": "ORG, PROV-O and Akoma Ntoso are conceptual alignments awaiting version-pinned mappings." }, { "dimension": "direct properties", "status": "covered", "notes": "Class, jurisdiction, language, purpose, scope and effect status are direct nonphysical properties." }, { "dimension": "physical measurements", "status": "not-applicable", "notes": "The root is an abstract instrument; scans and physical copies are manifestations, not physical properties of the root." }, { "dimension": "recognition and observation", "status": "covered", "notes": "Authority of inspected text and evidence of adoption require explicit review." }, { "dimension": "capabilities and actions", "status": "covered", "notes": "Local recording operations are separated from adopting, granting, enforcing and legally binding acts." }, { "dimension": "regional scope", "status": "gap", "notes": "Selected England and Wales, UK corporate and US federal committee examples do not establish global legal completeness." } ], "known_omissions": [ "Independent external review is absent; Claude and Grok are skipped under the owner-authorized waiver.", "Direct HTTP checks are not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox block; current versions, redirects and source hashes remain unverified.", "Full section 40 text and exceptions were not retrieved; only official indexed evidence supports the limited counterexample.", "Indigenous, religious, international, emergency and other national legal forms require separate research profiles.", "Nested data schemas, adversarial instance fixtures, signed-text verification, precise external bindings and executable conformance remain incomplete." ], "conflicts": [ "Legacy 1:1 constitution cardinality is rejected; the root may govern an existing body and must identify its actual subject relation.", "Legacy conformance labels and wildcard imports are not inherited.", "The supplement identifies a charter through organization number plus date; this is rejected as sole identity.", "The supplement suggests agents can answer signing authority categorically; this model returns evidence-qualified assertions and unresolved questions.", "Broad claims that constitutive rules change only through their own clauses are qualified by external legal authority and applicable profile." ], "regional_assumptions": [ "Charity guidance is scoped to England and Wales; company model articles apply only when evidenced as adopted.", "US federal committee renewal and filing guidance is illustrative and does not impose a universal lifespan or public-register duty.", "External standards support representation only; no legal-system equivalence or schema conformance is claimed." ], "adversarial_checks": [ "Attempt to use an organization number plus adoption date as the sole instrument identity: reject conflation.", "Attempt to treat a more recently uploaded draft as effective: require adoption and effect evidence.", "Attempt to infer legal invalidity solely from an internal limit: return a qualified-review dependency.", "Attempt to transfer a former holder's delegation automatically to a new employee: require capacity and grant evidence.", "Attempt to mark a duty satisfied on upload: preserve distinct submission, receipt and acceptance assertions.", "Attempt to expose private annexes through a public charter view: apply evidence-level access policy.", "Attempt to treat instrument expiry as dissolution of its governed organization: preserve separate lifecycle masters." ] }, "researchAdjudication": { "providerMode": "single-provider-waiver", "activeProviders": [ "codex" ], "waivedProviders": [ "claude", "grok" ], "providerPolicy": { "contract_version": "1.0.0", "mode": "single-provider-waiver", "effective_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "scope": "Canonical single-stream subject-model research after the six-workstream consolidation", "active_providers": [ "codex" ], "waived_providers": [ { "provider": "claude", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "Claude produced no result on prior 1800-second and 900-second attempts and again timed out on bounded 600-second Sonnet and 300-second Haiku passes. The owner prioritized completion over provider availability." }, { "provider": "grok", "authorized_by": "repository owner", "authorized_at": "2026-09-06T00:00:00Z", "reason": "The repository owner authorized completion without Grok when Grok is unavailable, slow or schema-invalid. Grok may still be attempted as a bounded supplemental reviewer, but its failure never blocks a valid Claude plus no-tools result." } ], "review_rule": "Codex may complete source-grounded fallback research after bounded Claude and Grok attempts fail. It requires a separate no-tools adversarial audit and remains reviewable-draft with a visible absence-of-external-review hold.", "supplemental_provider_attempts": [ { "provider": "claude", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." }, { "provider": "grok", "required": false, "maximum_attempts": 1, "failure_policy": "record-and-continue", "admission_rule": "Use only a locally schema-valid result whose sources and boundaries survive adjudication." } ] }, "boundaryDecision": { "entry_kind": "entity", "status": "accepted", "rationale": "One instrument has stable identity across its revisions and manifestations. Clause-level assertions belong to that instrument; independently issued instruments retain separate identities. The registry standalone-mm label is not a subject-kind enum. Governed organizations and operational authority masters remain external." }, "decisions": [ { "concept": "Instrument versus aggregate boundary", "disposition": "accepted", "rationale": "The declared root is consistently one instrument, not all constitutive rules for an organization. Legacy collections need explicit record separation during migration." }, { "concept": "Instrument and organization identity", "disposition": "legacy shortcut rejected", "rationale": "Organization number, adoption date and copy filename do not uniquely define the persistent instrument. Version and manifestation references remain separate." }, { "concept": "Mandatory constitution relationship", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "An instrument may govern an existing body; the legacy one-to-one constitution cardinality is not imposed. Typed subject roles preserve the actual relationship." }, { "concept": "Adoption and effect", "disposition": "accepted with profile dependency", "rationale": "The questions preserve competence, prerequisites, distinct events and precision. Record creation, upload and an asserted status do not create legal effect." }, { "concept": "Power limits and third-party reliance", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "The indexed section 40 evidence supports a narrow counterexample to universal invalidity, not an operational legal rule. Full exceptions and applicability remain a hold." }, { "concept": "Governance and delegation", "disposition": "accepted as evidence references", "rationale": "Membership and role occupancy remain external and cannot prove competence alone. Model articles require adopted applicability; grant scope and revocation are evidence-qualified." }, { "concept": "Amendment and external authority", "disposition": "legacy overclaim rejected", "rationale": "The result allows external law, approval and filing prerequisites rather than claiming instruments change only through their own clauses. Editorial corrections stay separate." }, { "concept": "Renewal and cessation", "disposition": "separated", "rationale": "Instrument expiry, partial mandate withdrawal and organization dissolution have distinct identities and effects. No universal renewal period is imposed." }, { "concept": "Accountability discharge", "disposition": "qualified", "rationale": "Submission, receipt and acceptance remain attributed assertions. No proposed local operation transmits a filing or legally discharges an obligation." }, { "concept": "Composition and legacy migration", "disposition": "candidate bindings only", "rationale": "No relation-ledger rows were found. Optional links require version pinning; the legacy public-register and general audit labels are not mapped to mismatched successor subjects." }, { "concept": "Local functions and service rules", "disposition": "accepted as proposed only", "rationale": "All six operations are explicitly unimplemented with local effects, authority and revision preconditions. They do not grant powers, sign, enforce or publish externally." }, { "concept": "Evidence privacy and retention", "disposition": "accepted with adopting-policy dependency", "rationale": "Public text and restricted evidence have separate audience controls. Record retirement is distinct from repeal, and retention rules qualify history preservation and payload deletion." }, { "concept": "Source coverage and conformance", "disposition": "held", "rationale": "The nine sources support scoped examples and representation distinctions. Source status is unmeasured locally; profiles, nested schemas, mappings and instance fixtures remain incomplete." }, { "concept": "Independent review", "disposition": "waived and held", "rationale": "Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the explicit owner override. This frozen local Codex self-audit is a separate phase, not independent external review." } ], "publicationHolds": [ "Independent external review is absent. Claude and Grok were skipped with zero attempts under the owner-authorized single-provider waiver; the separate Codex no-tools self-audit does not replace independent review.", "Source and version verification is incomplete. Direct HTTP checks were not attempted under the owner-reported sandbox block, giving zero measured HTTP 200 responses. Eight sources had browser content available for selected-section review; Companies Act section 40 had only official indexed excerpts and failed full retrieval. Coordinator HTTP checks, version pins and substantive review remain open.", "Qualified legal and adoption-profile review is required for jurisdiction, instrument type, actual adopted text, external amendment authority, third-party effects, retention, disclosure and current legal exceptions. Selected England and Wales, UK corporate and US federal committee examples do not establish universal rules.", "Nested instance schemas, version-pinned neighbor bindings, executable temporal and delegation checks, ORG/PROV-O/Akoma Ntoso mappings and adversarial fixtures are incomplete. No runtime, legal-compliance or standards-conformance certification is claimed.", "Independent external review was explicitly waived by the repository owner; this codex-only result remains a reviewable draft." ], "deferredResearch": [ "Verify exact source versions, current consolidated law and exceptions, final URLs and hashes outside the sandbox; HTTP success alone is insufficient.", "Develop adopting profiles and test multiple instruments, conditional effect, partial revocation, renewal gaps, conflicting copies, restricted annexes and lawful disposal.", "Implement nested instance schemas and loss-aware mappings, and pin all external model bindings before operational use.", "Restore independent external review before canonical or publishable-draft promotion." ] }, "statistics": { "sources": 9, "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 36, "artifacts": 12, "functions": 6 } }